1
To, 2021010256 MOIAB-E-2021-01761 July 21, 2021
1. Nodal Officer of the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi.
2. SHO concerned.
Subject: FIR against all the offenders, for the violation of 188 IPC read with the
Information Technology Act, 2000 and Information Technology (Procedure and
Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009.
Reference:
1. REPORT BY HSPCB IN OA NO. 169 of 2020 (Kuldeep Singh Vs State of
Haryana & Ors.), scanned by CamScanner, which is banned in India, vide letter
No. HSPCB/BHI/2021/538 Dated 16-7-2021.
2. District and Session Judge (HQ), Delhi circular dated 10-9-2020
Greetings,
Being a part of Community Policing as Man of many achievements and distinctions:
Voice for voiceless: Fighter by spirit: Jat by birth: Cobbler by profession: Activist by
mission: Humanitarian by choice, Gandhian by vision and action, being habitual khadi
and truth worrier, it is humbly submitted, that:
1. I am retired as Commissioner (HQ), Bharat Scouts and Guides, Haryana.
2. P-1 to P-202 are scanned by CamScanner, violating 188 IPC read with the
Information Technology Act, 2000 and Information Technology (Procedure and
Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009.
1. Government Bans 59 mobile apps which are prejudicial to
sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security
of state and public order.
2. Government of India blocks 43 mobile apps from accessing
by users in India MEITY issues order for blocking apps
under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act.
3. Government Blocks 118 Mobile Apps Which are
Prejudicial to Sovereignty and Integrity of India, Defence of
India, Security of State and Public Order.
The Information Technology Act, 2000, section 69A, described as under:
Power to issue directions for blocking for public access of any information
through any computer resource:
(1) Where the Central Government or any of its officers specially authorised
by it in this behalf is satisfied that it is necessary or expedient so to do, in the
interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security of the
2
State, friendly relations with foreign States or public order or for preventing
incitement to the commission of any cognizable offence relating to above, it
may subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), for reasons to be recorded in
writing, by order, direct any agency of the Government or intermediary to
block for access by the public or cause to be blocked for access by the public
any information generated, transmitted, received, stored or hosted in any
computer resource.
(2) The procedure and safeguards subject to which such blocking for access
by the public may be carried out, shall be such as may be prescribed.
(3) The intermediary who fails to comply with the direction issued under sub-
section (1) shall be punished with an imprisonment for a term which may
extend to seven years and also be liable to fine.
Hence, it is humbly prayed, that:
1. Lodge FIR against the offenders, for the violation of 188 IPC read with the
Information Technology Act, 2000 and Information Technology (Procedure and
Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009.
2. Issue orders to circulate ban orders, related to Chinese App.
3. Identification of all tools and equipment’s, related to ban Chinese app, to destroy
4. Any orders deem fit, including accountability and responsibility.
Yours in Scouting’s,
Naresh Kadyan,
C-38, Rose Apartment, sector- 14, Rohini, Delhi – 110085.
Distribution:
1. Chairman / Secretary, Haryana State Pollution Control Board, Panchkula.
2. Regional Officer, Haryana State Pollution Control Board, Bhiwani.
3. Director General of Police, Haryana
4. SP, Bhiwani.
3
4
5
6
7
8