2018 JC2 H1 Economics SA2 Pioneer Junior College
2018 JC2 H1 Economics SA2 Pioneer Junior College
FREETESTPAPER.com
for more papers
Website: freetestpaper.com
Facebook.com/freetestpaper
Twitter.com/freetestpaper
Name: Centre No. / Index No.: / Class:
______________________________________________________________________________
ECONOMICS 8823/01
Paper 1 13 September 2018
3 hours
Additional Materials: Answer Paper
____________________________________________________________________________
Write your Centre number, index number and name on all the work you hand in.
Write in dark blue or black pen on both sides of the paper.
You may use a soft pencil for any diagrams, graphs or rough working.
Do not use staples, paper clips, highlighters, glue or correction fluid.
The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question.
If there are part questions you did not attempt, please write the question number and part in
The margins before you submit your answers. (i.e. if did not complete 2b, indicate 2b in the
margin of the answer script that you submit for question 2.)
You are advised to spend several minutes reading the question and planning your answers
before you begin writing.
You are reminded of the need for good English and clear presentation in your answers.
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
2
BLANK PAGE
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
3
Answer all questions.
In his 1776 book An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, economist Adam
Smith made the most famous observation in all of economics: Households and firms interacting in
markets act as it they are guided by an “invisible hand” that leads them to desirable market
outcomes. Prices reflect both the value of a good to a society and the cost to society of making the
good. Because households and firms look at prices when deciding what to buy and sell, they
unknowingly take into account the social benefits and costs of their actions. As a result, prices
guide these individual decision-makers to reach outcomes that, in many cases, maximise the
welfare of society as a whole.
Although the invisible hand usually leads markets to allocate resources efficiently, that is not
always the case. Economists use the term market failure to refer to a situation in which the market
on its own fails to produce an efficient allocation of resources. One possible cause of market failure
is an externality, which is the impact of one person’s actions on the well-being of a bystander. The
invisible hand may also fail to ensure that economic prosperity is distributed equitably. In the
presence of externalities and inequitable distribution of income, government intervention such as
taxes, subsidies and price controls are used to enhance economic efficiency and achieve a more
equitable distribution of income.
As cash-strapped Western countries try to balance their books without raising unpopular taxes,
they are charging higher fees for everyday services. Half the countries in the EU have increased
health-care charges since the financial crisis. In Britain, where a severe fiscal squeeze is under
way, new fees are popping up in unexpected places, from the criminal courts to municipal pest-
control agencies.
Pay-as-you-go government has advantages. Charging for services helps allocate resources
efficiently, deterring overconsumption, just as parking meters stop people hogging spaces. And far
from being uniformly regressive, fees can be fairer than general taxation. Selling water by the litre,
as Ireland controversially began to do in January, means frugal users pay less than those whose
taps gush. Tuition fees reduce the subsidies paid to students by those who never enjoyed the
benefit of university. Some of the biggest consumers of free or subsidised services are the middle
classes, who ought to pay.
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
4
Extract 3: The pill that costs $9,000 in US sells for $70 in India
Last month, generic manufacturer Natco announced that it would be supplying daclatasvir,
a Hepatitis C drug, to 112 developing countries. In 2013, a medicine to treat Hepatitis C,
sofosbuvir, hit international headlines for its price — $1,000 per pill. The sofosbuivir and
daclatasvir combination used for the disease costs almost $150,000 per patient for the 12-week
regimen in the US. But in India, it is priced at just $700 or a little over Rupees 46,500 per patient
for the same regimen. And prices are expected to fall further.
Typically, the price of many expensive patented drugs in European countries like France, Spain or
the UK is half of what these cost in the US. In countries like Brazil or South Africa, these are a third
or a fifth of the US price. The Indian price is often 1/100th. This could be due to India’s patent law
which enhance competition by generic drug manufacturer.
Extract 4: India To Review Drug Price Control To Make It More Lucrative For Pharma
Companies
In a move that could potentially result in higher prices of many essential drugs, the Indian
government is considering a review of its current drug price control policy to encourage private
investments in the sector, Economic Times reported.
According to the ET report that cited a senior government official, Niti Aayog Chief Executive
Officer Amitabh Kant has asked India's health ministry to scrap all regulatory hurdles for pharma
companies. Niti Aayog sees the drug control regime as hindering investments in the sector, it
added.
The policy changing move, which is seeking to dilute the authority of the current drug price setting
authorities, has backing from the Prime Minister's Office, according to the report.
India has had a long history of making its essential drugs affordable for its large population and
has often sidestepped patents on certain major drugs. The country's regulators have been under
increasing pressure from pharmaceutical companies to recognise patents that allow them to
maximise profits.
Electric cars will be cheaper to own than conventional cars by 2022, according to a new report.
The plummeting cost of batteries is key in leading to the tipping point, which would kickstart a
mass market for electric vehicles, Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) analysts predict.
The large-scale roll-out of electric vehicles (EVs) is seen as vital in both cutting the carbon
emissions that drive climate change and in dealing with urban air pollution, which leads to many
premature deaths every year. But, despite subsidies in many countries, EVs remain more
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
5
expensive than conventional cars and the limited range of battery-only cars is still a concern.
Currently, just 1% of new cars sold are electric.
However, the analysis published by BNEF on Thursday predicts that the total cost of ownership –
combining purchase price and running costs – of battery-only cars will dip below those with internal
combustion engines in 2022, even if the conventional cars improve their fuel efficiency by 3.5% a
year. The analysis uses the US government’s projected oil price of $50-$70 (£36-£50) a barrel in
the 2020s. If the price is $20, the tipping point is pushed back by between three and nine years.
China
The emerging middle class in China represents a significant market for electric vehicles. Sales are
on the up, boosted by a generous incentive programme such as subsidies. Infrastructure
investment also aims to boost electric car ownership. Beijing plans to install more than 400,000
charging points by 2020.
Norway
Norway is often credited with leading the world in the charge towards electric vehicles. Although
not a major auto market, the sales of all electric vehicles are reportedly growing faster than
anywhere else. Very generous incentives, such as exemptions from value-added tax and free
travel on toll roads, have been so successful that last year the Norwegian government was forced
to review them.
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
6
Questions
(a) What is the main characteristic of a normative economic statement? Identify one example of
such a statement from Extract 2. [2]
(b) (i) Suggest a possible value of price elasticity of demand (PED) for drugs in USA and
explain two factors which bring about this value of PED. [6]
(ii) With reference to Extract 3 and using a demand and supply diagram, explain why the
price of drug in Figure 1 is much higher in USA than India given this value of PED.
[4]
(i) Using a demand and supply diagram, explain the effect of price control on the market
for essential drugs in India. [4]
(ii) Discuss the factors that the Indian government should consider when removing the
price control on essential drugs. [8]
(d) (i) With reference to Figure 2, compare the change in sales of electric cars from 2010 to
2015 between China and Norway. [2]
(ii) With reference to Table 3, give a reason for the difference in market share of electric
cars in Norway and China in 2015 despite the differences in the change in sales of car
in d(i). [1]
(iii) Comment on whether the change in sales in electric cars from 2011 and 2015 in
China and Norway is due to price factor. [6]
(e) Using evidence from the case study and/or your own knowledge, assess whether the price
mechanism will always allocate scarce resources in the most efficient manner for all goods
and services in a market economy. [12]
[Total: 45]
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
7
Question 2: The tale of BRICS
The story of the BRICS begins with Goldman Sachs chief economist Jim O’Neill, who wrote a
paper in 2001 arguing that these were the emerging superstars most likely to dominate the 21st
century globalized economy. Taken together, these five countries cover 40 percent of the world’s
population and more than 25 percent of the world’s land.
Roughly speaking, the BRICS can be broken into two groups—those that took advantage of
globalization’s march to integrate themselves into global supply chains (primarily China and India)
and those that took advantage of globalization to sell their abundant natural resources (primarily
Brazil, Russia and South Africa).
For India, instead of focusing on manufacturing, it went the services route instead. Today, services
account for roughly 61 percent of its GDP, with a particular emphasis on IT—at $108 billion, India
is one of the world’s leading IT services exporters. And the rise of India’s middle class resembles
that of China’s; Indians went from 1 percent of the global middle class in 1990 to 8 percent in 2015,
with another 380 million Indians expected to join by 2030.
The picture is decidedly mixed, meanwhile, with the other BRICS countries, who rose mainly on
the back of their vast natural wealth. Brazil sells commodities like soybeans, iron ore, and crude oil
on global markets. South Africa also used its natural wealth—in this case rare gems and metals
like gold, diamonds and platinum—to help get its economy on track following apartheid. In 1990,
the country exported $27 billion worth of goods; by 2011, that number had increased nearly five-
fold. And then there’s Russia, which spent the 1990s rebuilding itself from the rubble of the Soviet
Union. Thankfully, the country is blessed with abundant energy sources—crude oil, natural gas,
metals and minerals—that helped it find its footing. But the fall in commodity prices in 2015 to 2016
has done significant damage in all three countries.
It would be easy to label India and China as the clear winners among the BRICS, but it’s not that
simple. Yes, India and China have the fastest growth rates of any major economies in the world,
and citizens of these countries remain optimistic about the future. But nearly 50 percent of Indians
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
8
remain vulnerable to a slide back into poverty, and China’s economy has slowed as higher wages
make manufacturing more expensive. Both countries are especially vulnerable to technological
changes that bring automation into the workplace on a larger scale.
Research has predicted that the proportion of jobs threatened by automation in India is 69%, while
it is 77% in China, World Bank President Jim Yong Kim has said, citing data from the multilateral
agency.
While the Narendra Modi government has promised to create millions of jobs to absorb thousands
of youth coming to the workforce, critics say not enough jobs are being created in the economy.
Quick expansion of automation could contribute to a rise in structural unemployment in the labour
market and rising inequality, according to the World Development report.
From a technological standpoint, two-thirds of all jobs are susceptible to automation in the
developing world but effects are moderated by lower wages and slower technology adoption. Kim
called on creating resources for infrastructure to get developing countries to invest in people.
“Countries need to increase their investments in people necessary to build a workforce that can be
competitive in the economy of the future,” said the World Bank president.
The economy contracted by 3.6% in 2016, meaning it is now 8% smaller than it was in December
2014. The country has been hard hit by the fall in commodity prices and an internal political crisis
that has undermined investor confidence. The situation has been made worse by the high debt
levels. The two-year slump has seen the number of unemployed rise by 76% to 12.9 million, a rate
of 12.6%.
Brazil was once one of the fastest-growing economies in the world, the 'B' in the BRICS group of
nations regarded by many investors as having the world's best growth potential. Its key exports -
including oil, soy and metals, were in hot demand. But as growth in the biggest element of that
grouping, China, began to slow, so did demand for commodities and their prices.
But there are some signs that this recession may be soon over. Brazil's monthly inflation rates
suggest prices in the economy are stabilizing, and interest rates are falling at a faster pace than
expected. This could fuel consumption and investment and speed up the country's recovery. Also
there could be tailwinds from the global economy, with prices of commodities on the rise again and
possible growth coming from the US. But much of Brazil's recovery still depend on whether
government reforms in public spending are successful.
With a population rapidly approaching that of China crammed into just one third of the area, India
suffers from resource scarcity on a level unlike any other nation. So while it nominally faces many
of the same challenges as other BRIC nations – water scarcity, dirty energy supplies, human rights
issues – India’s population density makes its situation exponentially more difficult.
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
9
A World Bank study in 2014 found that environmental degradation like air pollution, water pollution,
deforestation and natural disasters cost India $80bn per year, or nearly 6% of its economic activity.
Of that total, 52% is attributable to air pollution. If you thought China’s smog was bad, Delhi’s air
pollution levels can be twice as high, with even less government action to show for it. India’s air
pollution is not only far worse than any of the other BRICs, it is so intense that it is reducing plants’
ability to photosynthesize sunlight, cutting crop yields in half.
While pollution is a broad problem across India, poverty and general lack of access to basic human
needs is more of a first order problem, and one that draws the lion’s share of attention from
government, businesses and people. In 2012, just 36% of India’s population had access to
improved sanitation, leading the nation’s minister of rural development to call India “the world’s
capital for open defecations”.
As a result, much of the sustainable development discussion in India has focused on inclusion and
bringing the population into the 21st century. In 2014, Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the
Clean India Mission, a five-year effort to eliminate open defecation, provide access to improved
sanitation, and clean up the River Ganges, among other targets. Corporations have joined up with
the Clean India Mission, committing to invest in education for girls and adopting communities for
cleanup, among others. During the UN climate talks in Lima, Peru, last fall, Modi announced a
massive solar commitment: 100 gigawatts of solar capacity by 2022, creating as many as 1m jobs
and giving rural Indians access to cheap, clean energy and greater economic opportunity as a
result.
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
10
Questions
(a) Using Table 4, compare the growth performance of China and India with that of Brazil and
Russia. [2]
(i) Extract 7 states that “the fall in commodity prices of recent years has done significant
damage in all three countries.”
Explain how this has impacted the macroeconomic objectives of Brazil, Russia and
South Africa. [4]
(ii) To what extent does the data in Table 4 support the suggestion that the fall in
commodity prices in 2015 to 2016 has done significant damage in Brazil, Russia and
South Africa? Justify your answer. [3]
(iii) Using a diagram, explain how ‘China’s economy has slowed as higher wages make
manufacturing more expensive.’ [4]
(c) (i) Using Extract 8 explain how automation could contribute to a rise in structural
unemployment in the labour market and rising inequality. [5]
(ii) In light of the negative effects brought about by automation, World Bank President Jim
Yong Kim expresses the importance to increase investments in people necessary to
build a workforce that can be competitive in the economy of the future.
Comment on whether such a policy would be effective in reducing the negative effects
brought about by automation. [6]
Evaluate the policy options available to the Brazilian government to revive its economy. [9]
(e) “Data on GDP growth rates are no longer relevant in measuring the well-being of its citizens.”
Discuss this view. [12]
[Total: 45]
Pioneer Junior College 2018 8823 / 01 / PJC Preliminary Examination / 2018 [Turn over
Suggested Answers
2018 PJC H1 Economics Preliminary Examination Paper 1
Question 1: Controlling the Price Mechanism
(a) What is the main characteristic of a normative economic statement? Identify [2]
one example of such a statement from Extract 2.
Suggested answer:
(b) (i) Suggest a possible value of price elasticity of demand (PED) for drugs in [6]
USA and explain two factors which bring about this value of PED.
Suggested answer:
The demand for drugs tend to be price inelastic. Possible value of price elasticity of
demand for drugs in USA is < 1.
Nature of the good is one factor that affects the price elasticity of demand for drugs.
As drugs is a necessity to cure diseases, the consumers have no choice but need to
consume drugs even when the price rises, hence quantity demanded falls less than
proportionately, making the demand for drugs price inelastic.
Number and closeness of substitutes is another factor that determines the price
elasticity of demand. As there are no or little substitutes for drugs to cure diseases due
to patents by the US government, this makes the demand for drug to be price inelastic.
When the price of the drug rises, consumers cannot switch to the relatively cheaper
substitutes, hence quantity demanded of the drug falls less than proportionately.
(b) (ii) With reference to Extract 3 and using a demand and supply diagram, [4]
explain why the price of drug in Figure 1 is much higher in USA than India
given this value of PED.
Suggested answer:
1
Correctly labelled diagram (accept answers that show 2 diagrams)
(i) Using a demand and supply diagram, explain the effect of price control on [4]
the market for essential drugs in India.
Suggested answer:
Definition
2
Price control is part of the governments’ price and incomes policy to control prices and
incomes in the country. Government can control the price of good either by setting a
price ceiling (maximum price) or a price floor (minimum price) [1]
Explanation of how price control works and effect of price controls on the
market
The government can control price through a price ceiling, that is, by setting a price
below the market equilibrium price at P1. At this price, quantity supplied is at Q1,
producers do not have the incentive to produce more. The quantity demanded is at
Q2 which is greater than the quantity supplied creating a shortage.
Additional points
The final exchange of the good will be at P1 and Q1.
In the long run, the shortage may create a black market where the consumers resell
the good at a higher price at P2 which is higher than the original equilibrium price and
at quantity Q1.
(ii) Discuss the factors that the Indian government should consider when [8]
removing the price control on essential drugs.
Suggested answer:
Introduction
To remove the price control on essential drugs, the Indian government needs to
consider the issue of equity and the ability to attract investments.
If price control is removed on essential drugs, the price and quantity will revert back to
the original equilibrium level where the prices will be higher.
This will affect the lower income group of consumers where they may not be able to
afford and access to basic essential drugs. As a result, it will affect their health and
non-material SOL may fall. Poorer health may also lower their productivity. This will
have a macro impact on the economy and AS may fall in the long run.
On the other hand, removing price control will attract pharmaceutical firms to increase
their investment in India. As higher prices will give the firms incentives to invest in their
production. Higher profits will also encourage these firms to engage in research and
development of the products making the product to be better and cheaper. This will
benefit the consumers if the firms pass down the cost savings to the consumers as
lower prices (E). Government can also collect higher tax revenues from these profit-
making firms and use the revenue to benefit the citizens through providing more public
and merit goods.
(Evaluation) Hence, the Indian government needs to consider the benefit and cost of
price control. In the event that the cost of lower investment outweighs the benefit of
lower price of drugs, it might be better for the Indian government to remove the price
3
control. Instead, the Indian government can provide more targeted help or subsidies
to the lower income consumers using the tax revenue collected from the
pharmaceutical firms so that they can continue to afford the expensive drugs even
without the price control.
(d) (i) With reference to Figure 2, compare the change in sales of electric cars [2]
from 2010 to 2015 between China and Norway.
Suggested answer:
Both China and Norway are experiencing an increase in the sales of electric cars from
2010 to 2015.
However, the sales of electric cars for China increase at a faster rate compared to
Norway.
(ii) With reference to Figure 3, give a reason for the difference in market share [1]
of electric cars in Norway and China in 2015.
Suggested answer:
Even though the sales of electric cars for China increase at a faster rate compared to
Norway, the sales of non-electric cars for China probably rise even faster resulting in
an overall small market share.
or
Even though the sales of electric cars for China increase at a faster rate compared to
Norway, the number of non-electric cars for China is much higher than Norway which
explains the small market share in China.
(iii) To what extent is the change in sales in electric cars from 2011 and 2015 [6]
in China and Norway due to price factor.
Suggested answer:
From 2011 to 2015, the sales in electric cars are rising. This may be due to price and
non-price factors.
Price factor
Given the high subsidies to the producers of electric cars, the firms are able to produce
more at a given price and hence supply increases and shifts to the right. This will result
in a fall in price. Hence a fall in price will lead to rise in quantity demanded for electric
cars and that explains the rise in the sales of electric cars in China and Norway. [3] or
Non-price factors
However, the rise in the sales of electric cars may be due to non-price factors like
income. With a higher economic growth in China, there will be a rise in income and
hence citizens will have a higher purchasing power to buy luxury goods like electric
car. In addition, “infrastructure investment also aims to boost electric car ownership.
Beijing plans to install more than 400,000 charging points by 2020” shows that the
consumers are changing their taste and preferences and are more willing to buy
electric cars if they find it convenient to recharge their electric cars.
4
In Norway, as citizens are more educated and are more concerned with environmental
issues, the change in taste and preferences causes them to buy electric cars instead
of non-electric cars and hence a rise in the sales of electric cars.
Given the evidence in the extract, the rise in the sales of electric cars is likely due to a
combination of both price and non-price factors.
(e) Using evidence from the case study and/or your own knowledge, assess [12]
whether the price mechanism will always allocate scarce resources in the most
efficient manner for all goods and services in a market economy.
All societies face the problem of scarcity where there are limited resources (land,
capital, labour and entrepreneurship) available to satisfy unlimited wants.
Price mechanism uses the changes in demand and supply to determine price.
Demand is the amount of good or service that consumers are willing and able to pay
over a given period of time, ceteris paribus. Supply is the amount of good or service
that producers are willing and able to produce over a given period of time, ceteris
paribus.
Price mechanism will allocate resources in the most efficient manner for most goods
and services
Using demand and supply, the price mechanism serves as a signal to society to decide
what to produce, how much to produce and for whom to produce in order to allocate
scarce resources.
Since consumers and producers are rational decision makers, they are driven by their
self-interest. Consumers aims to maximize their own welfare by ensuring that the
marginal cost of paying for the good is equal to the marginal benefit they get from
consuming the good. Producers aim to maximize their profit by ensuring that the
marginal revenue is equal to the marginal cost of producing the last unit of good.
Based on the self-interest of consumers and producers, the price mechanism will
ensure that the quantity demanded of a good will always be equal to the quantity
supplied, hence maximising society welfare which is made up of consumer and
producer surplus leading to efficient allocation of resources.
Referring to the figure above, when there is an increase in the demand for a good such
as smartphones from D0 to D1 , this will cause a shortage of smartphones of Q0Q0’ at
the original price P0. As a result, there will be an upward pressure in price. As
consumers bid up the prices, quantity demanded will fall. As price increases,
5
producers will be willing to increase quantity supplied as they will be able to earn a
higher profit if they increase output for the production of smartphones. This process
will continue on until a new equilibrium price P1 is achieved where quantity demanded
for the smartphones is equal to quantity supplied of smartphones at Q1.
Therefore, price mechanism will allocate scarce resources in the most efficient manner
for most of the goods and services in a market economy.
Price mechanism will not always allocate resources in the most efficient manner in the
presence of market failures
However, this is only true when the goods do not exhibit externalities or the goods are
not public goods which exhibit non-rivalry and non-excludability. For such goods, the
price mechanism will fail to allocate resources efficiently and hence government
intervention may be needed.
In the case material, where pharmaceutical drugs are considered as a merit good that
yields positive externalities, the market may fail to be allocative efficient and
underprovide such goods.
With reference to the figure above, pharmaceutical drugs not only benefit the person
consuming it but also third parties such as their employers who now enjoyed the
external benefits of having a more productive worker. Hence the social marginal
benefits (SMB) is higher than the private marginal benefits (PMB). However, price
mechanism only considers PMB and PMC and hence only Qe of pharmaceutical drugs
will be provided in the market whereas the socially optimal level occurs at Qs where
SMB is equal to SMC (social marginal cost). Hence, there is an under-provision of
pharmaceutical drugs in the market of QeQs leading to welfare loss as shown by the
shaded area and an inefficient allocation of resources in the market.
Thus, government intervention is needed when the market fails to be efficient due to
the presence of positive externalities. This can take the form of subsidies and
regulation. For example, in the market for electric cars, subsidies is used to lower the
cost of producing electric cars hence increasing the supply of electric cars and
lowering the price. This will encourage more consumers to buy electric cars instead of
non-electric cars hence reducing pollution caused by the use of non-electric cars.
Evaluation
In conclusion, price mechanism may not always allocate scarce resources in the most
efficient manner for all goods and services in a market economy due to market failures
caused by presence of externalities. Hence, government intervention is needed to
ensure an efficient allocation of resources.
6
However, government intervention will also lead to inefficient allocation of resources.
Government does not have perfect information and may not know how much to
subsidy. Over-subsidy can lead to over-production of a good resulting in an inefficient
allocation of resources. Government may also have to incur an opportunity cost by
cutting down on spending on other markets (e.g. education) leading to inefficient
allocation in other markets.
7
Question 2: The tale of BRICS
(a) Using Table 4, compare the growth performance of China and India with [2]
that of Brazil and Russia.
Suggested Answer:
China and India have a positive growth in GDP throughout the entire
period, while Brazil and Russia experienced negative growth from 2015-
2016.China and India also have higher growth rates throughout the entire
period.
(i) Extract 7 states that “the fall in commodity prices of recent years has done [4]
significant damage in all three countries.”
Brazil, Russia and South Africa are commodity exporters. As such, when
the prices of commodities fell, the total export revenue will be affected.
Since the demand for commodities is likely to be price inelastic due to the
lack of close substitutes, the fall in price leads to a less than proportionate
increase in quantity demanded. Hence, total export revenue falls. This
leads to a fall in net exports and aggregate demand, ceteris paribus. Real
GDP falls and economic growth suffers.
Furthermore, the fall in output also means that firms’ demand for labour
falls, leading to higher unemployment.
(ii) To what extent does the data in Table 4 support the suggestion that the [3]
fall in commodity prices in 2015 to 2016 has done significant damage in
Brazil, Russia and South Africa? Justify your answer.
Suggested Answer:
The data in Table 4 supports the suggestion that a fall in commodity prices
would have a significant damage on the 3 countries’ economic growth. This
is seen in the data for Brazil and Russia that they are suffering from
negative growth rates in 2015 and 2016 when commodity prices fell. South
Africa also suffered a fall in GDP growth rates from 2015 to 2016 when
commodity prices fell in the same period.
However, the data might not fully support the suggestion as South Africa
was still able to maintain a positive growth rate throughout the entire period
despite the fall in commodity prices, indicating that it might not have
experienced significant damage unlike that of Brazil and Russia.
(iii) Using a diagram, explain how ‘China’s economy has slowed as higher [4]
wages make manufacturing more expensive.’
Suggested Answer:
Higher wages will lead to a rise in cost of production (COP). This leads to
an upwards shift in Aggregate Supply (AS) from AS1 to AS2, leading to a
rise in General Price Level (GPL) from P1 to P2.
8
However, Table 4 shows that China’s economy is still growing, as such,
this indicates that the Aggregate Demand (AD) must be rising at a faster
rate. Thus, real GDP still increases, but the fall in AS slows down the rate
of growth.
(c) (i) Using Extract 8 explain how automation could contribute to a rise in [5]
structural unemployment in the labour market and rising inequality.
Suggested Answer:
(ii) In light of the negative effects brought about by automation, World Bank
President Jim Yong Kim expresses the importance to increase
investments in people necessary to build a workforce that can be
competitive in the economy of the future.
[6]
Comment on whether such a policy would be effective in reducing the
negative effects brought about by automation.
Suggested Answer:
9
Investment in people through education and retraining could allow low-
skilled workers to acquire new skills which would enable them to take up
jobs in the sunrise industries, thereby reducing structural unemployment.
As these workers would gain higher skills through education and retraining,
they are also able to bargain for higher wages at their new workplaces.
This reduces the income inequality between the high skilled workers and
low skilled workers in the economy.
However, this policy might not be effective as it takes time to educate and
train workers. Moreover, the success of the policy also depends on the
receptiveness of workers. Less educated or older workers might be less
receptive to education and re-training, which would render such a policy
ineffective in reducing structural unemployment or income inequality.
Brazil is suffering from recession due to falling export revenue and fall in
Investments. The large government debt is also causing firms to lose
confidence in the government which thereby causes firms to withdraw their
investments in Brazil. In order to revive the economy, the Brazilian
government can adopt expansionary monetary policy together with
austerity measures. This is so that while austerity measures may induce
contractionary effects on the economy to cure the problem of public debt,
the expansionary monetary policy can stimulate growth and revive the
Brazil economy. However, there are several factors that might limit the
effectiveness of these policies.
10
often have to go through parliamentary debates and discussion which may
take a long time to come to a decision. Thus by the time decisions were
made, firms may have lost their confidence with the economy and any
austerity measures would have been useless in restoring confidence back
to the economy.
Note:
1. Analysis on LT policies such as SS side policies or trade policies
could also gain credit but are poor application to the context as the
context hints the use of ST policies to achieve recovery.
(e) “Data on GDP growth rates are no longer relevant in measuring the well- [12]
being of its citizens.” Discuss this view.
Suggested answers:
GDP growth rates measure the percentage change in value of final output
produced within the geographical boundary of the country, regardless of
factor ownership before depreciation in a year and after excluding the
effects of inflation. While it is a useful data in assessing the change in
11
material aspect of standard of living, it is limited in assessing the changes
in the non-material aspect. Thus, it is important for countries to
complement the use of GDP growth rate data with other data such as HDI
so as to have a holistic view in assessing the overall well-being of its
citizens.
When GDP growth rates are positive, it implies that a country’s real GDP
has increased. The increase in real GDP means higher production of
goods and services, which means more goods and services are available
for consumption in the country. Furthermore, if the population growth is
slower than real GDP growth, it would mean that real GDP per capita has
increased. With higher real income per person, purchasing power
increases. Each person can purchase more goods and services. Hence,
material SOL will increase, indicating an improvement in the well-being of
citizens.
Due to the limitations of data on GDP growth rates, countries might want
to consider using Human Development Index (HDI) as a better indicator in
measuring the well-being of its citizens. The HDI is a composite statistic of
life expectancy, education and real GNI per capita, which are used to rank
countries into four tiers of human development. Together, it accounts for
both the material and non-material aspects of welfare as thus is a better
representation of the well-being of the citizens in the country. However,
there are limitations of HDI data as it only looks at one indicator for each
aspect of economic, social and demographic aspects which does not
provide a complete representation of well-being of the citizens in a country.
12
Furthermore, as the calculation of HDI requires the use of multiple data
sources to formulate, accuracy of data sources is often questionable and
it often take a very long time for HDI data to be made available.
13