Scribd
Upload
112 views2 pages

Evaluation Tool For Language

The document provides an evaluation checklist for language used in self-learning modules developed by DepEd. The checklist contains 4 categories (Coherence and Clarity of Thought, Grammar and Syntax, Spelling and Punctuation, and Consistency in Style) with specific criteria for each. Evaluators are instructed to review modules page by page, check criteria that are met, and note any criteria not met along with specific errors and recommendations for improvement. The checklist is used to ensure language in modules meets standards for clear organization, proper grammar, correct spelling and punctuation, and consistent presentation of content.

Uploaded by

Janine Bernadette Macaso
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
112 views2 pages

Evaluation Tool For Language

The document provides an evaluation checklist for language used in self-learning modules developed by DepEd. The checklist contains 4 categories (Coherence and Clarity of Thought, Grammar and Syntax, Spelling and Punctuation, and Consistency in Style) with specific criteria for each. Evaluators are instructed to review modules page by page, check criteria that are met, and note any criteria not met along with specific errors and recommendations for improvement. The checklist is used to ensure language in modules meets standards for clear organization, proper grammar, correct spelling and punctuation, and consistent presentation of content.

Uploaded by

Janine Bernadette Macaso
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ANNEX 1B

EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR LANGUAGE


For DepEd-Developed Self-Learning Modules

Learning Area: ____________________________ Grade Level: ___ Quarter: ___


Title/s: _____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

⬋⬌

Instructions:
1. Carefully read the modules page by page to evaluate its compliance to standards indicated
in the criterion items under the six (4) factors below.
2. Put a check mark () in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is
NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the error/deficiency found, and give your
recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings form.
3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that do not apply in the modules evaluated.

Standard/Criterion Items YES NO


Category A. Coherence and Clarity of Thought
1. Do the statements / phrases make sense?

2. Do the sentences in the paragraph contribute to one idea?

3. Are the thoughts / ideas logically sequenced?


4. Are conjunctions and transitional phrases used to link sentences or
paragraphs?
5. Is the choice of words / expressions appropriate?

6. Is the length of sentences appropriate to the target learners?

7. Is the language appropriate for the target learners?

8. Are the headings or titles appropriate to the content?

9. Is there proportional or equal treatment of topics of the same importance?

Category B. Grammar and Syntax


1. Does the set of SLMs have the correct subject - verb agreement?

2. Does the set of SLMs have correct placement of modifiers?


3. Does the set of SLMs have clear antecedents?

4. Does the set of SLMs have correct parallel construction?

5. Does the set of SLMs have no split infinitives?

6. Does the set of SLMs have no overused words?

7. Does the set of SLMs have no redundancies?

Category C. Spelling and Punctuation


1. Are words, whether local or foreign, correctly spelled?

2. Are the right punctuations in the right places?

3. Is the use of the serial comma (comma before and and or) observed?
Category D. Consistency in Style
1. Where alternative spellings are permitted, was a choice made and used
consistently throughout the materials?
2. Are main heads, subheads, sections, and subsections consistently
classified?
3. Is the need for the same tense or person observed?
4. Are the rules on capitalization, hyphenation, setting off in italics or
boldface followed?
5. Is there consistence in phraseology of titles, presentation or introduction of
new chapters or units?

Prepared by:

Evaluator 1: Printed Name Signature:

Evaluator 2: Printed Name Signature:

Date Accomplished:

You might also like