100% found this document useful (5 votes)
3K views8 pages

Ipcrf Head Teacher 2020 2021 Template

This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for Maria Cristina A. Canlas for the school year 2020-2021. It outlines her key result areas, objectives, targets, and performance indicators in her role as Head Teacher III at Exequiel R. Lina High School. Her mid-year and final evaluations for the 2020-2021 school year are included, showing she met or exceeded expectations for all targets. She received high ratings and scores for implementing the School-Based Management program and curriculum at her school.

Uploaded by

Annie Sta Maria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (5 votes)
3K views8 pages

Ipcrf Head Teacher 2020 2021 Template

This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for Maria Cristina A. Canlas for the school year 2020-2021. It outlines her key result areas, objectives, targets, and performance indicators in her role as Head Teacher III at Exequiel R. Lina High School. Her mid-year and final evaluations for the 2020-2021 school year are included, showing she met or exceeded expectations for all targets. She received high ratings and scores for implementing the School-Based Management program and curriculum at her school.

Uploaded by

Annie Sta Maria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) - RPMS FOR SY 2020-2021

Name of Employee: MARIA CRISTINA A. CANLAS Name of Rater: MARY FINELA M. BAYAN, PhD
Position: HEAD TEACHER III Position: SCHOOL PRINCIPAL IV
School: EXEQUIEL R. LINA HIGH SCHOOL Date of Mid-Year Review: 05/07/2021 Date of Final Evaluation: 07/30/2021
Division: NUEVA ECIJA

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING ACTUAL RESULTS


Weight Performance Indicators
KRAs/ Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating Score
Objectives Evaluation Evaluation
KRA 4 4.5 5
I. SBM
Basic
IMPLEMENTATION 20% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education
PLAN
Services 1.A . School 1. Access At least 3% increase. Or At least 5% increase. Or At least 7% increase. Or
Performance To improve enrolment rate, completion and 3.0-4.99% 5.0-6.99% 7.0% and above
Improvement 3.0% cohort survival rate, to lessen the no. of drop- 5 5 5 0.15
out students

2. Efficiency At most 2% decrease Or At most 4% decrease Or Has 0 RP or more than


To improve enrolment rate, completion and 0.01-2.0 2.01 - 4.0 4%. Or 4.01 and above
3.0% cohort survival rate, to lessen the no. of drop- 5 5 5 0.15
out students

3. SBM Level of Practice Level I Level II Level III


3.0% 5 5 5 0.15
Maintain level III Pracice
4.Educational Planning Involved and reported Implemented and outdid Institutionalized strategic
Help in the formulation of ESIP,AIP and APP school plans and targets the specified plans in planning and
and fully implemented within the school year to school and eSIP for the current accomplishing plans with
3.0% stakeholders school year focused on DepEd VMO 5 5 5 0.15
based on school priority
needs

5. Records Management/Use of Technology Updated School Forms , Utilized IT System and Unified personnel on
in SMO eBEIS, LIS and pertinent updated reports on organized and
records. Conducted accuarately with systematic reporting on
3.0% To keep and organized the updated reports 5 5 5 0.15
Physical Inventory reproduction materials time and accurately with
and datas systematically
and supplies reproduction materials
and supplies
records. Conducted accuarately with systematic reporting on
3.0% To keep and organized the updated reports 5 5 5 0.15
Physical Inventory reproduction materials time and accurately with
and datas systematically
and supplies reproduction materials
and supplies

Weight Performance Indicators


KRAs/ Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating Score
Objectives 4 4.5 5 Evaluation Evaluation
KRA
Basic 1.A . School 6. Management of Other School Funds Updated other financial Posted or published Reported other funds to
Education Performance records. Transparency financial work and other school and stakeholders
Services Improvement 2.0% Board school funds in SRC or who are entrusted with #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Transparency Board authority, responsibility
and accountability
7. Abeyance to DepED Orders and Following DepED policy Adhered to no DepED Strictly adhered to no
Memorandum with activities (selective: policy with resolution DepED policy such as
enrolment, graduation, (selective: enrolment, absolute no collection
3.0% classroom or school graduation, classroom or (enrolment, graduation, #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
level) school level) but w/ less classroom and school
improved outputs level) but still with impact

Basic II. SCHOOL


20% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education CURRICULUM
Services MONITORING AND 8. Instructioanal Supervision Implemented the Achieved all the targets Accomplished more than
EVALUATION PLAN *To formulate ISP and fully implemented activities stated in the and plans indicated in expected targets in the
* Instructional 4.0% within the school year ISP the ISP ISP with improved #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Supervision learner's performance
9. Checking of DLL's/ Lesson Plans Noted and visited Inspected and corrected Addressed DLP
DLLs/DLP's of all inconsistencies in concerns and provided
4.0% teacher's DLLs/DLP's regularly enrichment on the DLL #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
To check and visit DLLs/DLP and provided
enrichment of the DLL reflections of teachers reflections of teachers.
10. Class Observation
To observe 100% of teachers with COT Completed required Utilized COT religiously Improved teaching and
number of COT. and exceede the number learning processs
4.0% of required observations through provision of
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Technical
Assistance,demo etc

11. Holistic Assessment Provided teachers with Conducted Holistic Raised the status of
2.0% different Holistic Assessment religiously assessment through #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Assessment activities targetting various skills development
12. Intervention Program/Best Practices Supervised Remedial learners
Conducted intervention
Initiated intervention or
To initiate intervention, innovation or research class program for or skill development
innovation which
3.0% which resulted to greater impact or best specific learners. programs. Practice best
resulted to greater #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
practices addressing deficiencies with at least Adapted best practices for practices for learners
impact. Institutionalized
50% success from benchmarking needs and skills Best practice addresses
learning difficiencies
13. Learning Resources Development/ Adopted and improved Initiated development of Developed and utilized
Curriculum
To Enrichment
monitor the maximum use of materials and curriculum materials or curriculum materials and localized or
provide curriculum materials based on activities. Enriched activities. Utilized contextualized
learners needs classroom level activities enriched curriculum curriculum materials and
3.00% materials. Applying for activities based on #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
special curriculum. learners needs.
Supported special
curriculum(SP-ICT etc.)
3.00% materials. Applying for activities based on #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
special curriculum. learners needs.
Supported special
curriculum(SP-ICT etc.)

Weight Performance Indicators


KRAs/ Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating Score
Objectives Evaluation Evaluation
KRA 4 4.5 5
Basic III. SCHOOL
Education RESOURCE 20% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services MANAGEMENT: *
14. School / Classroom Improvement Improve or with proposal Ensured eradication of Established WOW
To maintain and improve the schools WOW to improve eye sore. Eye Sore and wow structure, facilities and
structure and facilities. Maintained/ Painted/ feature or structure. modernization project
5.0% Repaired classrooms Improved and with high social and #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
restructured classrooms academic expectations
to everybody.

15. DRRM Installed DRRM Practiced safety, Institutionalized DRRM


provisions resilienced and best practices and
5.0% precautionary acquired emergency kits #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Support DRRM Plans and Projects
measuires. and facilities.
16. School Beautification Projected school Promoted learning Practiced positive
aesthetic factor or value environment, -thermal learning climate, clean
5.0% To improved learning facilities and centers for comfort and appealing and green, child friendly #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
and park within the year for a better learning ambiance and health environment.-
outcomes and sanitation.
17. Donations and Projects not from LGU, PAPs amounting to P25- PAPs amounting to P51- PAPs amounting to 76K
SEF or MOOE) 50K 75K and above
5.0% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
To establish support and cooperation with
stakeholders
IV. HUMAN
RESOURCE
20% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
MANAGEMENT AND 18. Technical Assisstance Provided Technical Surpassed the targeted Applied the learnings on
DEVELOPMENT To give the needed technical assisstance and Assisstance and TAPs and completed TAPs and Aps focused
foprmulate action plan based on the result of conducted action plan APs created pool of on the improvement of
observation for holistic development of teachers as coach, teaching and learning #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4.0% teachers mentors or trainers. and holistic development
of teachers

19. In-Service Activities (INSETs) and SLAC Eccouraged 20% of Employed 40% of Engaged 60% of
teachers to be involved teachers in district or teachers to be involved
in district or higher higher INSET and in Division or higher LAC
3.0% To provide and conduct LAC / INSET within INSET and SLAC surpassed targeted or INSET activities with #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
the school year with at least 80% attendance activities. SLAC plans/activities. possible
results/outcomes.

20. Managing Performance Management Completed the Conveyed results of Commit tteachers to
evaluation of teachers performance and have and improved
To monitor and evaluate teachers IPCRF and portfolio evaluated teachers performance to get an
performance by following 4 phases of RPMS IPCRF regularly Outstanding rating.
following 4 phases.
4% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Completed the Conveyed results of Commit tteachers to
evaluation of teachers performance and have and improved
To monitor and evaluate teachers IPCRF and portfolio evaluated teachers performance to get an
performance by following 4 phases of RPMS IPCRF regularly Outstanding rating.
following 4 phases.
4% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Weight Performance Indicators


KRAs/ Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating Score
Objectives 4 4.5 5 Evaluation Evaluation
KRA
21. Creating Professional Learning and Encouraged teachers to Established professional Enjoined stakeholders
Development (L&D) Community To join professsional learning support to and partnership to
monitor the needs of teachers and provide learning group.Analyzed address teachers support PAPs for
programs for development PPST needs fo teachers request and concerns. teachers
learning & development Conducted professional professionalism,
3.0% L7D scholarship and personal #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
l growth and
development based on
PPST needs analysis
and action plans

22. Incentives, Welfares and Checked the pertinent Assissted teachers get Helped teachers receive
Benefits/Rewards and Recognition papers of tecahers i.e incentives,welfare and incentives and arranged
Recognized the effort and efficiency of salary, plantilla item, etc. benefits from teachers welfare and
teachers for personal development Recognized teachers stakeholders Guided benefits in any form.
through awards or teachers to receive Honed teachers to get
3.0% development program awards for personal awards or recognition #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
development which is institutionalized
for their personal growth
and development

23. Education and Promotion Motivated 25% of Assissted 50% of Facilitated 25% of
To teachers to pursue teachers in pursuing teachers to have finished
guide teachers and acquire units for graduate studies and graduate studies in graduate studies and
3.0% professional and personal growth apply promotion applying for promotion helped get promotion or #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
reclassification

Basic V. SPECIAL ASSIGN


Education TASK
20% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services 10% 25. Parents Involvement or stakeholders PAPs amounting to PAPs amounting to PAPs amounting to
Partnership from parents: from parents: from parents:
To coordinate with stakeholders in the P15-25K 26-55K P56K and above
acquisition of learning materials, resources
and equipment within the school year From Community: From Community: From
P51K-100K P101K-150K Community:
Brigada Brigada P151K and above
Eskwela: 26K to Eskwela: 51K to Brigada
50K 75K Eskwela: 76K to
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
100K
Eskwela: 26K to Eskwela: 51K to Brigada
50K 75K Eskwela: 76K to
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
100K

Weight Performance Indicators


KRAs/ Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating Score
Objectives Evaluation Evaluation
KRA 4 4.5 5
PLUS FACTOR 10% Other performed functions and services Acted as Chair, judge or Served as chair, Performed more than as
facilitator in INSET or evaluator, trainer or writer, validator,
PAPs or Professional member of TWG in evaluator or coordinator
clubs or 1 more INSETs, PAPs or clubs or chair of SDO or other
coordinatorship within in SDO or 3 or more agency PAPs or regional
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
the district or municipality coordinatorship in the professional club or
or hosted 1 CD event district or higher office or hosted 2 or more SDO
hosted 1 or more SDO events or 1
events regional/national events

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


Very Satisfactory #DIV/0!
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING CONFORME:
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory Date: October 2020 Phase I - Performance Planning and Commitment:
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory Ratee: Rater:
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor MARIA CRISTINA A. CANLAS MARY FINELA M. BAYAN, PhD
Head Teacher III Principal IV

Date: Phase II - Performance Monitoring and Coaching


Ratee: Rater:

MARIA CRISTINA A. CANLAS MARY FINELA M. BAYAN, PhD


Head Teacher III Principal IV

Date: May 2021 Phase III - Performance Review and Evaluation (Mid-Year Review with SMEPA)
Ratee: Rater:

MARIA CRISTINA A. CANLAS MARY FINELA M. BAYAN, PhD


Head Teacher III Principal IV

REYNALDO S. REYES
EPS1, Monitoring Supervisor
FINAL AND YEAR-END EVALUATION:
Recommending Approval:

RONILO E. HILARIO
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Approving Authority

JESSIE D. FERRER, CESO V


Schools Division Superintendent
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (I
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teach

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight Numeri
Weight per
KRA Objectives per
KRA Q
Objective
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 5
Objective 3 7.5% Err:509
Objective 4 7.5% 5
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER


Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
Err:509 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Err:509 Err:509 5.000 0.150
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Err:509 5.000 0.150
Err:509 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Err:509 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Err:509 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Err:509 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Err:509 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Err:509 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Err:509 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating Err:509
Adjectival Rating Err:509

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY


Rater Approving Authority

You might also like