From PASPA to IPL: Appraising the changing paradigm of sports’ gambling
Summary/abstract of the context
Professional and amateur sports protection act of 1992 (PASPA) put into motion by the
State of New Jersey is the subject of analysis of this paper. The acts objectives is to
criminalize and prohibit sports gambling; source of revenue that the state is contending
it’s right to in times of distress. Games wagering is basically the setting of the setting of
a budgetary wager on the result of a gaming match. The rise of the gambling market
can be appropriated to a number of developments. The most essential of these is the
availability and access of the internet as a mechanism for the dissemination of
information at an instantaneous manner. The advertisements in exploiting the sports
television also led to its expansion. Many countries lockdown on activities such as sports
wagering, a primary reason for such laws in common law countries being that it become
a leakage in the financial system where money is exchanged even though no productive
activity is taking place. Concerns for sports wagering include the emergence of crime
syndicates, corruption scandals in sports and wasteful spending by its participants. On
the contrary, proponents of legalizing sports gambling believe that it would lead to a
decrease in the criminal element of these activities by bringing it out into the
mainstream where it can flourish adequately, reduce the possibilities of match-fixing in
sports because of the regulation of unusual money flows in these channels and provide
a novel source of tax and advertising revenue from its participants that are largely from
the young, high-income earning demographic. Internet websites provide a flourishing
medium for unregulated content. It has been observed that the gambling population
includes young, educated males belonging to a high economic bracket and with easy
access to internet and electronic devices.
The debate on legalization of sports wagering is based on the combating of falling
integrity in sports and organized crime. Secondly, by putting a complete restriction the
government would have to spend on enforcement bodies which would require
additional expenditure. Thirdly, the most evident consequence of legalizing sports'
betting would be the creation of collateral employment opportunities.
The debate around legalizing sports betting in India originates in the context of cricket's
match-fixing scandals. Match/spot fixing and unregulated betting have plagued the
sports' popularity post the Indian Premier League's inception in 2008, with various
stakeholders waking to the realization that sports betting is a ubiquitous phenomenon
that requires regulation to bring it out of the USD 150 billion black market of underhand
transactions. Legality of betting with stakes vis-à-vis gaming laws in India depends, as
in most foreign jurisdictions, upon whether the game is one of skill or of chance. Games
based on skill are deemed lawful trading activities and are guaranteed protection under
Article 19[1(g)] and Article 301 of the Constitution. Section 12 of the Public Gambling
Act, 1867 envisages an exception of betting on games of skill played anywhere in the
country. Currently, gambling is legal in Goa and Sikkim and licensed online gambling is
legal only within the territorial limits of Sikkim for non-residents. Nagaland recently
brought out legislation to regulate online games of skill; however, this Act may be open
to constitutional challenges as per the Chamarbaugwala judgement and Entry 42, List I
of the Seventh Schedule regulating inter-state trade and commerce for extra-territorial
effect. Sports betting are excluded from the Act's designated list of games of skill at the
present stage.