Project 4 - Design Proposal For Facade Refurbishment
Project 4 - Design Proposal For Facade Refurbishment
03
2.2.4 Advantages
Comparison
3.1 softwares
3.2 digital building surveying technology
Project concept
Use and apply the recent digital surveying technology, in order to take accurate
measurement for existing façade ,to redesign the façade of College of Engineering C07
In Qatar University, according to the challenges that could restrict us to change it.
Goal
To know and understand what may happen in the near future and imagine the
problems that may occur in the exterior and interior of College of engineering building,
with being considerate about the design and aesthetic.
Objectives
To learn about the latest tools used as the levels, theodolites, total station, EDM, 3D
Laser Scanners etc.
Evaluate the Data and measurements of surveying works.
basic needs for surveying in construction projects
Materials Used
1.3
Functionality Reasons of Life safety
The Exterior Façade should be refurbishment Enhance the Life safety and
more Functional with the interior accessibility of the building
space of College of Engineering
building.
Style Materials
Redesign old Buildings to change their Using more modern materials
styles, and aesthetic features that can resist the weather and
the circumstances.
1. Introduction
• Types of photogrometry:
- Aerial photogrammetry
- Close range photogrammetry
2.1.2 Methodology
Figure 3: Photogrammetry
Microsoft
IMAGINE Photogrammetry Proprietary Semi-automatic Yes, multiple images Aerial, satellite, UAS Images
Windows
Linux, macOS,
Metashape (Former Yes, multiple images, cluster Aerial, close-range, UAS,
Proprietary Microsoft Yes Images Yes, Agisoft Cloud
PhotoScan) distributed processing satellite
Windows
Linux, macOS,
Free & open WebODM
OpenDroneMap Microsoft Yes Yes, multiple images Aerial, close-range, UAS Images
source Lightning Network
Windows
• Less automated process allows for more user error – results depend • Automated process after targets are placed and scanner is started; less
Operational
greatly on experience of operator. chance for user error.
Complexity
• Weather Dependent. • Penetrates through high canopy areas.
Outputs
Accuracy
Time Efficiency
Errors
Ease of Use
Figure 4: LiDAR more effective in high-vegetation areas, low-light, or even at night, without needing an external light source.
On the other hand, photogrammetry drone’s results flight can be heavily affected by low light, dust, or cloud cover.
3. Comparison
3.2 digital building surveying technology
Photogrammetry Point Cloud Surveying (Ex: LIDAR)
• Less automated process allows for more user error – results depend • Automated process after targets are placed and scanner is started; less
Operational
greatly on experience of operator. chance for user error.
Complexity
• Weather Dependent. • Penetrates through high canopy areas.
Errors
Ease of Use
Visual
Representation
Figure 5 : LIDAR
Figure 6: Photogrammetry
3. Comparison
3.2 digital building surveying technology
Photogrammetry Point Cloud Surveying (Ex: LIDAR)
• Less automated process allows for more user error – results depend • Automated process after targets are placed and scanner is started; less
Operational
greatly on experience of operator. chance for user error.
Complexity
• Weather Dependent. • Penetrates through high canopy areas.
• Errors when dealing with reflective/transparent surfaces. • Error rate is fixed based on the capabilities of the equipment.
Errors • Less automated process allows for more user error – results depend • Automated process after targets are placed and scanner is started; less
greatly on experience of operator. chance for user error.
Ease of Use • Straightforward and Simplified workflows. • Complex, requires high level of understanding.
LIDAR
Best for
Terrain models below dense vegetation, forestry,
3D modeling of power lines or cables, 3D modeling
of complex structures.
Figure 7: Photogrammerty
Figure 6: Lidar
Photogrammetry
Best for
Mapping, surveys, mining, broad-coverage
combined with high horizontal accuracy.
4. Discussion and conclusion
1. If we need a high degree of precision over a wide area, LIDAR is generally your best choice. If we're documenting smaller
spaces and want less precision but more visual photo realism, photogrammetry is a better choice.
2. LIDAR is extremely powerful in specific conditions, such as challenging projects where elevation accuracy, complex
3. On the other hand, photogrammetry will be more than adequate for broader surveying requirements: it is generally more
affordable, more accessible, and, if done correctly, it is accurate enough to suit most needs. Moreover, if better Visual
representation of textures and colors is required then it’s the most suitable option.
4. Discussion and conclusion Conclusion
Low vegetaion
Adequete Accuracy
Best Option:
Photogrammetry
Project Timeline
Work distribution
Site analyses
On site review
Phase 2 submission
References:
Basics of photogrammetry. (2020, September 20). Retrieved March 16,
2021, from https://www.gisresources.com/basic-of-photogrammetry_2/
What is a point cloud survey? (2021, March 17). Retrieved March14, 2021,
from https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/what-is-a-point-cloud-
survey