Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
Question: Show that the set {5, 15, 25, 35} is a group under multiplication modulo
40. What is the identity element of this group? Can you see any relationship between
this group and U(8)?
Solution : Let G = {5, 15, 25, 35}
The Cayley Table for G is
40 5 15 25 35
5 25 35 5 15
15 35 25 15 5
25 5 15 25 35
35 15 5 35 25
Clearly G is closed under ⨂40. Also, associativity holds.
Identity element is 25.
Inverse of 5, 15, 25, 35 is 5, 15, 25, 35 respectively. Therefore, G is a group under
⨂40.
Now U(8) = {1, 3, 5, 7}
Each element of U(8) when multiplied by 5 gives the set {5, 15, 25, 35}.
1
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
Problem: The set 𝐺 = {1,2,3,4,5} is not a group w.r.t.
multiplication modulo 6, since 23 = 0 ∉ 𝐺.
Problem: The set 𝐺 = {1,2,3,4} is an abelian group w.r.t.
multiplication modulo 5.
Problem: The set 𝐺 = {1,5,7,11} is a group w.r.t. multiplication
modulo 12.
Problem: The set 𝐺 = {2,4,8} is a group w.r.t. multiplication
modulo 14.
Problem: The set 𝐺 = {1,2,3,4,5,6} is a group w.r.t.
multiplication modulo 7.
Problem: U (15) {xZ |1 x 15, gcd ( x, 15) 1} is an abelian group
under multiplication modulo 15.
2
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
Question. For all integers n 1, the set of complex roots of unity, 𝐺 =
k 2 k 2
cos i sin k 0, 1, 2,..., n 1
n n
is a group under multiplication.
2k 2k
We have cos i sin ei 2 k / n [ 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑥 + 𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑥 = 𝑒 𝑖𝑥 ]
n n
G {1, e 2 i / n , e 4 i / n , e6 i / n ,..., e 2( n1) i / n } {1, w, w2 , w3 ,..., wn 1 ), where
2𝜋𝑖⁄ 𝑛
we 2 i / n
and w = n
(𝑒 𝑛 ) = 𝑒 2𝜋𝑖 = 1.
∴ 𝐺 {1, w, w2 , w3 ,..., wn1 ), where 𝜔𝑛 = 1.
(i) Closure Property :
Let a, b G, then an = 1 and bn = 1.
Now (ab)n = an bn = 1.1 = 1 abG
Therefore, G is closed w.r.t. multiplication.
3
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
(ii) Associativity: :
The elements of G are all complex numbers and the
multiplication of complex numbers is associative.
(iii) Existence of Identity :
We have 1 G and 1.a = a = a.1 aG. Therefore, 1 is the
identity of G.
(iv) Existence of Inverse :
If wk be any element of G, then wnk is also an element of G.
We have, wn k wk wn 1 wk wn k wn-k is the inverse of wk.
Further, the multiplication of complex numbers is commutative.
Therefore, G is a finite abelian group w.r.t.multiplication.
4
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
Question: Prove that
a b
SL(2, F ) A a, b, c, d Q or R or C and | A | 1 is a non-abelian group
c d
under matrix multiplication.
Let A, BSL (2, F), then |A| = 1and |B| = 1. Since |AB| = |A|.|B| = 1.1 = 1, therefore
AB SL(2, F).
SL (2,F) is closed under matrix multiplication
Matrix multiplication is associative.
1 0
SL(2, F ) is the identity element.
0 1
a b d b
Inverse of SL(2, F ) is SL(2, F ) .
c d c a
Also, matrix multiplication is not commutative in general.
Therefore, SL(2, F) is a non-abelian group under matrix multiplication.
This group is called the special linear group of 2 2 matrices over 𝑄, R or C
respectively.
5
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
Question: For a fixed point (a, b) in R2, define
Ta, b: R2 R2 by Ta, b (x, y) = (x + a, y + b).
Prove that, 𝐺 = T ( R 2 ) {Ta , b | a, b R} is a group under function
composition.
Let Ta , b , Tc, d T ( R 2 ) = 𝐺
Then, Ta, b Tc, d ( x, y) Ta, b ( x c, y d ) ( x c a, y d b)
Ta c , b d ( x, y ) T ( R 2 )
G is closed.
Function composition is always associative.
T0, 0 T ( R 2 ) is the identity as
𝑇𝑎,𝑏 𝑇0,0 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑇𝑎,𝑏 (𝑥 + 0, 𝑦 + 0) = 𝑇𝑎,𝑏 (𝑥, 𝑦)
Ta , b T0, 0 Ta , b T0, 0 Ta , b .
6
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
The inverse of Ta , b T ( R 2 ) is T a, b T ( R 2 ). as
𝑇𝑎,𝑏 𝑇−𝑎,−𝑏 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑇𝑎,𝑏 (𝑥 − 𝑎, 𝑦 − 𝑏)
= (𝑥 − 𝑎 + 𝑎, 𝑦 − 𝑏 + 𝑏) = (𝑥 + 0, 𝑦 + 0)
= 𝑇0,0 (𝑥, 𝑦)
Also, G is abelian. Therefore, G is an abelian group under
function composition.
Question: Prove that the set G {0,1, 2,3, 4,5} is a finite abelian
group of order 6 w.r.t. addition modulo 6.
Question: Prove that the set U(7) = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} is a finite
abelian group w.r.t multiplication modulo 7.
7
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
Elementary Properties of Groups
Theorem : In a group G, prove that
(1) Identity element is unique.
Proof: Suppose e and e are two elements of G which act as
identity.
Then, since eG and e is identity, therefore
ee ee e …(1)
and as e G and e is identity, therefore
ee ee e …(2)
(1) and (2) e e
which establishes the uniqueness of identity in a group.
8
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
(2) Inverse of each aG is unique.
Proof: Let aG be any element and let a and a be two inverse
elements of 𝑎, then
aa aa e and aa aa e
To show: a a,
Now, a ae a(aa) (aa) a ea a, showing thereby that inverse of
an element is unique.
Note : We shall denote inverse of 𝑎 by a1.
Remember 𝑏 is inverse of 𝑎 iff 𝑎𝑏 = 𝑏𝑎 = 𝑒, 𝑖. 𝑒. in other words,
𝑎𝑎−1 = 𝑒 = 𝑎−1 𝑎.
(3) (a1)1 = a, aG, where a1 stands for inverse of a.
Proof: Since a1 is inverse of 𝑎, ∴ aa 1 a 1a e
which also implies 𝑎 is inverse of a1. Thus, (a1)1 = a.
9
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
(4) (ab)1 = b1a1, a, bG
Proof: We have to prove that b1a1 is inverse of 𝑎𝑏 for which
we need to show:
(ab) (b 1a 1 ) (b 1a 1 )(ab) e.
Now, ( ab)(b 1a 1 ) [( ab)b 1 ]a 1 [ a(bb 1 )]a 1 (ae)a 1 aa 1 e.
Similarly (b1a1) (ab) = e and thus the result follows.
10
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
(5) (𝑎1 𝑎2 … 𝑎𝑛 )−1 = 𝑎𝑛 −1 𝑎𝑛−1 −1 … 𝑎1 −1 for 𝑎1 , 𝑎2 , … , 𝑎𝑛 in
𝐺
Proof: We prove the result by induction on 𝑛.
Clearly the result holds for 𝑛 = 1.
Suppose that the result holds for 𝑛 = 𝑘, 𝑖. 𝑒.,
(𝑎1 𝑎2 … 𝑎𝑘 )−1 = 𝑎𝑘 −1 𝑎𝑘−1 −1 … 𝑎1 −1 …(i)
Now, (𝑎1 𝑎2 … 𝑎𝑘+1 )−1 = ((𝑎1 𝑎2 … 𝑎𝑘 )𝑎𝑘+1 )−1
= (𝑎𝑘+1 )−1 (𝑎1 𝑎2 … 𝑎𝑘 )−1 [ Using (4) ]
= (𝑎𝑘+1 )−1 (𝑎𝑘 −1 𝑎𝑘−1 −1 … 𝑎1 −1 ) [ Using (i) ]
= 𝑎𝑘+1 −1 𝑎𝑘 −1 … 𝑎1 −1
Hence, the result holds for 𝑛 = 𝑘 + 1. Thus, by induction, the
result holds for all natural numbers 𝑛.
11
Group Theory Dinesh Khattar
(6) ab = ac b = c and ba = ca b = c a, b, cG.
(called the cancellation laws)
Proof: Let ab = ac, then
b eb (a 1a )b a 1 (ab) a 1 (ac) (a 1a )c ec c.
Thus, ab ac b c,
which is called the left cancellation law.
Now, let ba = ca, then
b be b(aa 1 ) (ba )a 1 (ca )a 1 c(aa 1 ) ce c.
Thus, ba ca b c,
which is called the right cancellation law.
12