Scribd
Upload
37 views2 pages

Suraz India Trust V Uoi SC Order08 Sep 2021watermark 400212

The document discusses a court hearing regarding a contempt of court case. The court heard from the petitioner, respondent, and state counsel. The petitioner stated a desire to apologize and withdraw previous statements. The court reserved judgment and allowed the petitioner to file additional documents within three days for consideration.

Uploaded by

Joshi NM
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views2 pages

Suraz India Trust V Uoi SC Order08 Sep 2021watermark 400212

The document discusses a court hearing regarding a contempt of court case. The court heard from the petitioner, respondent, and state counsel. The petitioner stated a desire to apologize and withdraw previous statements. The court reserved judgment and allowed the petitioner to file additional documents within three days for consideration.

Uploaded by

Joshi NM
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

WWW.LIVELAW.

IN
1

ITEM NO.14 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION PIL-W

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Miscellaneous Application No. 1630/2020 in W.P.(C) No. 880/2016

SURAZ INDIA TRUST Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA Respondent(s)


(PETITIONER-IN-PERSON MATTER.
IA No. 62346/2021 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)

Date : 08-09-2021 This application was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH

By Courts Motion
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajiv Daiya, Petitioner in person

For Respondent(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG


Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv.
Mhd. Akhil, Adv.
Mr. Sughosh Subramanyan, Adv.
Mr. B.V. Balram Das, AOR

Rajasthan Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv.


Mr. Sandeep Kumar Jha, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R

The respondent-judgment debtor and the contemnor in the

contempt proceedings has appeared in pursuance to bailable

warrants and we have heard him at some length.

We have also heard the learned Additional Solicitor

General and learned counsel for the State.

In the end, as per usual practice in prior proceedings,

the petitioner stated that he wants to tender an unconditional

apology seeking to withdraw all what he has said. We have put


WWW.LIVELAW.IN
2

to him that he has liberty to file what he pleases within three

days and we will take that into consideration while passing our

orders.

Judgment reserved.

(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID)


ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

You might also like