100% found this document useful (1 vote)
112 views12 pages

Illinois Identity Theft Laws

Illinois ranks 11th in identity theft complaints, with 10,304 reported in 2007. The state has specific laws defining identity theft and its penalties, which vary based on the value of the theft, and includes aggravated identity theft with enhanced penalties for crimes against vulnerable individuals. Additionally, Illinois law regulates the collection and storage of biometric information, requiring consent and protective measures for individuals' data.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
112 views12 pages

Illinois Identity Theft Laws

Illinois ranks 11th in identity theft complaints, with 10,304 reported in 2007. The state has specific laws defining identity theft and its penalties, which vary based on the value of the theft, and includes aggravated identity theft with enhanced penalties for crimes against vulnerable individuals. Additionally, Illinois law regulates the collection and storage of biometric information, requiring consent and protective measures for individuals' data.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

ILLINOIS

IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 11, 80.2 Complaints Per 100,000
Population, 10304 Complaints (2007)
Updated November 30, 2008

Current Laws: A person commits the offense of identity theft when he or she knowingly uses
any personal identifying information or personal identification document of another person to
fraudulently obtain credit, money, goods, services, or other property. Penalties for identity theft
depend on the value of the theft.

If the value of the credit, money, goods, services, or other property is less than $300, the crime is
a Class 4 felony, punishable by one to three years in prison and a fine up to $25,000. Subsequent
offenses are upgraded to a Class 3 felony, punishable by two to five years in prison, as is the
penalty for people who have previously been convicted of certain crimes, including burglary,
theft, or fraud. If the amount is between $300 and $2000, it is a Class 3 felony; between $2000
and $10,000 is a Class 2 felony (punishable by two to seven years in prison); between $10,000
and $100,000 is a Class 1 felony (punishable by four to fifteen years in prison); and over
$100,000 is a Class X felony (punishable by six to thirty years in prison).

Penalties are increased one step (with the exception of a Class X felony) if the victim of the
offense is an active duty member of the Armed Services or Reserve Forces of the United States
or of the Illinois National Guard serving in a foreign country.

It is also identity theft if a person:


 Uses any personal identification information or document of another with intent to commit
any felony theft or other felony violation of state law;
 Obtains, records, possesses, sells, transfers, purchases, or manufactures any personal
identification information or document of another with intent to commit or to aid or abet
another in committing any felony theft or other felony violation of state law;
 Uses, obtains, records, possesses, sells, transfers, purchases, or manufactures any personal
identification information or document of another knowing that it was stolen or produced
without lawful authority;
 Uses, transfers, or possesses document-making implements to produce false identification or
false documents with knowledge that they will be used by the person or another to commit
any felony theft or other felony violation of state law;
 Uses any personal identification information or document to portray himself as that person to
gain access to information or documents of that person, without consent; or
 Uses personal identifying information or document of another in order to gain access to the
record of the actions taken, communications made or received, or other activities or
transactions of that person, without consent.

Illinois - 1
“Personal identifying information” means any of the following information: a person’s name;
address; date of birth; telephone number; driver’s license or state identification card number;
Social Security number; employer or employment number; maiden name of a person’s mother;
number assigned to a person’s depository account, savings account, or brokerage account;
number assigned to a person’s credit or debit card; personal identification numbers (PIN);
electronic identification numbers; digital signals; user names, passwords, or other words or
characters used to access information relating to an individual, or to actions taken,
communications received or made, or other activities; any other numbers or information that
could be used to access a person’s financial resources, to identify a specific individual.

“Personal identifying document” means a birth certificate, driver’s license, state identification
card, employment identification card, Social Security card, firearm owner’s identification card,
credit or debit card, or a passport. It also includes any document made or issued, or falsely
purported to have been made or issued, by the federal, state, or any local government body that is
intended for the purpose of identification of an individual.

Violations are a Class 3 felony, with a repeat or subsequent offense upgraded to a Class 2 felony.
It is also a Class 2 felony if the offense includes the identifiers of or other information relating to
three or more separate individuals.

In addition, if the person used any personal identification information or document of another
person to purchase methamphetamine manufacturing material, it will be a Class 2 felony, and a
Class 1 felony for a second or subsequent offense.
Statute: §720 ILCS 5/16G-15:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K16G-15

Aggravated identity theft occurs when a person commits the offense of identity theft against a
person 60 years or older; against a disabled person; or in furtherance of the activities of an
organized gang. Violations are a Class 3 felony if the identity theft of credit, money, goods,
services or other property is under $300; a Class 2 felony if between $300 and $10,000; a Class 1
felony if between $10,000 and $100,000; and a Class X felony if it exceeds $100,000.
Subsequent convictions for aggravated identity theft regardless of the value of the property
involved is a Class X felony.
Statute: §720 ILCS 5/16G-20:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K16G-20

A person commits the offense of facilitating identity theft when he or she, in the course of his or
her employment or official duties, has access to the personal information of another person in the
possession of the State of Illinois, whether written, recorded, or on computer disk and
knowingly, with the intent of committing identity theft, aggravated identity theft, or any violation
of the Illinois Financial Crime Law, disposes of that written, recorded, or computerized
information in any receptacle, trash can, or other container that the public could gain access to,
without shredding that information, destroying the recording, or wiping the computer disk so that
the information is either unintelligible or destroyed. Violations are a Class A misdemeanor,
punishable by up to one year in prison, for a first offense and a Class 4 felony for a second or
subsequent offense.

Illinois - 2
Statute: § 720 ILCS 5/16G-13:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K16G-13

Jurisdiction: State law allows for an identity theft prosecution to occur in either the county
where the theft occurred, the county where the information was illegally used, or where the
victim resides.
Statute: 720 ILCS 5/16G-35:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K16G-35

Identification Cards: It is a Class 4 felony for any person to knowingly possess, display, or
cause to be displayed any fraudulent or unlawfully altered identification card. The penalty
increases to a Class 3 felony and a Class 2 felony for subsequent offense if the person does so to:
 Obtain any account, credit, credit or debit card from a bank, financial institution, or retailer;
 With the intent to commit a theft, deception, or credit or debit card fraud; or
 With the intent to commit any other violation of any law for which a sentence of one year
imprisonment is imposed;
 Do so with the unauthorized possession of any document, instrument or device capable of
defrauding another; or
 Do so with the intent to use the identification card to acquire any other identification
document.

State law also prohibits knowingly possessing without authority any identification card making
implement; the duplication, manufacture, sale, or transfer of any fraudulent identification card;
or the advertisement or distribution of any information or materials that promote the selling,
giving, or furnishing of a fraudulent identification card.
Statute: §15 ILCS 335/14B:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/001503350K14B.htm

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/001503350K14D.htmPayment Cards: It is a
Class 4 felony to make or cause to be made, either directly or indirectly, any false statement in
writing, knowing it to be false and with intent that it be relied on, respecting his identity, address,
or employment for the purpose of procuring the issuance of a credit or debit card.
Statute: §720 ILCS 250/3: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072002500K3.htm

A person who receives a credit card or debit card from the person, possession, custody or control
of another without the cardholder’s consent; or who with knowledge that it has been so acquired,
receives the credit or debit card with intent to use, sell, or transfer it to another person other than
the issuer or cardholder is guilty of a Class 4 felony. A person with two or more such credit or
debit cards each issued to different cardholders other than himself is presumed to have
committed this offense. If a person, in any 12-month period, commits this offense with respect
to three or more credit or debit cards issued to different cardholders is guilty of a Class 3 felony.
Statute: §720 ILCS 250/4: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072002500K4.htm

It is a Class 4 felony for a person to receive a credit or debit card that he knows to have been lost
or mislaid and who retains possession with intent to use, sell, or transfer it to a person other than
the issuer or cardholder. The penalty increases to a Class 3 felony if, in a single transaction, a

Illinois - 3
person violates this law with three or more credit or debit cars issued to cardholders other than
himself.
Statute: §720 ILCS 250/5: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072002500K5.htm

It is a Class 4 felony for a person other the issuer to sell a credit or debit card, without the
consent of the issuer; or for a person to purchase a credit or debit card from a person other than
the issuer, without consent. It is a Class 3 felony if, in a single transaction, a person violates this
law with three or more credit or debit cars issued to cardholders other than himself.
Statute: §720 ILCS 250/6: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072002500K6.htm

It is unlawful for a person, who with intent to defraud either the issuer, a person providing
money, goods, property, services, or anything else of value, or any person, uses for the purpose
of obtaining money, goods, property, services, or anything else of value, a credit or debit card
obtained or retained fraudulently or without the cardholder’s consent, or a card that he knows is
counterfeited, forged, expired, or revoked. It is a Class 4 felony if the value of all money, goods,
property, services, or other things of value obtained or sought does not exceed $300 in a six-
month period, and a Class 3 felony if it exceeds that amount.
Statute: §720 ILCS 250/8: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072002500K8.htm

A person who receives money, goods, property, services or anything else of value obtained
fraudulently, knowing that it was so obtained, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor if the value
does not exceed $150 in any six-month period, and a Class 4 felony if it exceeds that amount.
Statute: §720 ILCS 250/13: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072002500K13.htm

It is a Class A misdemeanor for any person, other than the cardholder or a person authorized by
him, who with intent to defraud, signs a credit or debit card.
Statute: §720 ILCS 250/14: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072002500K14.htm

A person who is not party to a transaction that involves the use of a financial transaction device,
such as a credit or debit card, may not secretly or surreptitiously photograph or otherwise capture
or record, either electronically or by any other means, or distribute, disseminate, or transmit
personal identifying information from the transaction without the consent of the person whose
information is photographed or otherwise captured, recorded, distributed, disseminated, or
transmitted. Violations are a Class A misdemeanor.
Statute: §720 ILCS 5/16G-14:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K16G-14

Phishing: State law prohibits phishing, the act of posing as a legitimate company or government
agency in an email, Web page, or other Internet communication in order to trick a recipient into
revealing his or her personal information. It will be unlawful for any person, by means of a Web
page, electronic mail message, or otherwise through use of the Internet, to solicit, request, or take
any action to induce another person to provide identifying information by representing himself,
herself, or itself to be a business without the authority or approval of the business. A person who
is engaged in the business or providing Internet access service to the public, owns a Web page,
or owns a trademark and is adversely affect by a phishing violation will be allowed to bring an
action against a the violator to recover the greater of actual damages or $500,000. Individual

Illinois - 4
victims may bring an action to seek greater of three times the amount of actual damages or
$5,000 per violation.
Statute: §740 ILCS / 7:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2921&ChapAct=740%26nbsp%3BILCS%
26nbsp%3B7%2F&ChapterID=57&ChapterName=CIVIL+LIABILITIES&ActName=Anti%2D
Phishing+Act%2E

Biometric Information: State law provides for guidelines for the collection and storage of
biometric data and the rights of those whose data is collected. Under state law, public agencies
and private entities must inform a person in writing and to receive that person’s consent before
collecting biometric information.

“Biometric identifier” means a retina or iris scan, fingerprint, voiceprint, or scan of hand or face
geometry. Biometric identifiers do not include writing samples, written signatures, photographs,
human biological samples used for valid scientific testing or screening, demographic data, tattoo
descriptions, or physical descriptions such as height, weight, hair color, or eye color. “Biometric
information” means any information, regardless of how it is captured, converted, stored, or
shared, based on an individual's biometric identifier used to identify an individual. Biometric
information does not include information derived from items or procedures excluded under the
definition of biometric identifiers.

State law requires private entities in the possession of biometric identifiers or information to:
 Develop a written policy, made available to the public, establishing a retention schedule and
guidelines for permanently destroying biometric identifiers and biometric information when
the initial purpose for the collecting or obtaining such identifiers or information has been
satisfied or within three years of the individual’s last interaction with the private entity,
whichever occurs first.
 Before collecting or otherwise obtain a person’s biometric identifier or information, the
entity must first inform the subject in writing that the information is being collected or
stored; the length of term for which the information will be stored and used; and obtain
written release from the subject.
 Store, transmit, and protect from disclosure all biometric identifiers using the reasonable
standard of care within the entity’s industry, and in a manner that is the same as or more
protective than the manner in which the private entity stores and protects other confidential
and sensitive information.

The law also:


 Prohibits the selling, leasing, trading, or otherwise profiting from a person’s biometric
information.
 Prohibits the disclosure of biometric information unless the customer consents; the disclosure
completes a financial transaction requested or authorized by the customer; the disclosure is
required by state or federal law; or is required pursuant to a valid warrant or subpoena.

In addition, the new law requires all public agencies and private entities collecting biometric
identifiers or information to establish a retention and destruction schedule. Under this schedule
biometric identifiers or information must be destroyed after the initial purpose of collecting or

Illinois - 5
obtaining the information has been fulfilled or within 3 years of the individual’s last interaction
with the agency or entity. It provides certain exemptions for public agencies, especially law
enforcement and prosecuting agencies and entities issuing driver’s licenses and permits.
Text of Legislation: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/95/095-0994.htm

Victim Assistance:

Mandatory Police Reports: Law enforcement agencies are required to accept and provide
police reports to identity theft victims. After being contacted by a victim of identity theft, law
enforcement agencies must take a police report of the matter, provide the victim with a copy of
the report, and begin an investigation of the facts. If the suspected crime was committed in a
different jurisdiction, the agency may refer the matter to the agency where the suspected crime
was committed for an investigation of the facts.
Statute: §720 ILCS 5/16G-30:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K16G-30

Civil Suits: A person who is convicted of facilitating identity theft, identity theft, or aggravated
identity theft is liable in a civil action to the person who suffered damages as a result of the
violation. The person suffering damages may recover court costs, attorney’s fees, lost wages and
actual damages.
Statute: §720 ILCS 5/16G-20:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K16G-21

Criminal Identity Theft: State law allows a person who reasonably believes he is the victim of
identity theft to petition a court for a factual declaration of innocence. It seeks to assist victims
of criminal identity theft, in which the perpetrator of the theft was arrested for, cited for, or
convicted of a crime under the victim’s identity; where a criminal complaint has been filed
against the perpetrator in the victim’s name; or where the victim’s identity has been mistakenly
associated with a record of criminal conviction. After a court has issued a declaration of factual
innocence, the court may order the name and associated personal identifying information
contained in court records, files and indexes accessible by the public be deleted, sealed, or
labeled to show that the data is impersonated and does not reflect the defendant’s identity
Statute: §720 ILCS 5/16G-30:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K16G-30

Prohibition Against Debt Collectors: State law requires debt collectors to cease collection
activities of a debt when an alleged debtor provides a police report of identity theft and other
proof of his status as an identity theft victim. The debt collector must review and consider the
information provided by the alleged victim and may only recommence debt collection activities
only after making a good faith determination that the information does not establish that the
information does not establish that the debtor is not responsible for the specific debt in question.
The debtor must be notified of this determination. Debt collectors who cease collection activities
are required to notify the creditors and consumer credit reporting agencies to which the collector
previously provided adverse information.
Statute: § 225 ILCS 425/1:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1355&ChapAct=225%26nbsp%3BILCS%

Illinois - 6
26nbsp%3B425%2F&ChapterID=24&ChapterName=PROFESSIONS+AND+OCCUPATIONS
&ActName=Collection+Agency+Act%2E

Security Freeze: State law allows all consumers to place security freezes on their consumer
credit reports to prevent identity thieves from opening new accounts in their names. Such a
freeze enables the consumer to prevent anyone from looking at his/her credit file for the purpose
of granting credit unless the consumer chooses to allow a particular business look at the
information. To request a freeze, a consumer must request one in writing to the credit reporting
agencies. The credit reporting agency may charge up to $10 to place, remove, or temporarily lift
a security freeze. Senior citizens 65 years or older will not be charged to place or permanently
lift the security freeze, but may be charged up to $10 for each temporary lifting of a security
freeze. Victims of identity theft will not be charged any fees in connection with the placing,
removing, or temporary lifting of a security freeze.

The reporting agency must place the freeze within five business days after receiving the request,
and within ten days of placing the freeze must send a written confirmation of the freeze and
provide the consumer with a unique personal identification number or password to be used by
the consumer when providing authorization for the release of his credit for a specific party or
period of time. Requests for a temporary unlocking of the freeze must be completed within three
business days.
Statute: §815 ILCS 505/2MM:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=081505050K2MM

“Placing a Security Freeze on Your Credit Report (includes sample letters)”:


http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/security_freeze.pdf

Security Breaches: State law requires all data collectors operating in the state that own or
license personal information concerning an Illinois resident to notify the resident when there has
been a breach of the security of the system, putting them at risk of identity theft. A “data
collector” may include, but is not limited to, government agencies, public and private
universities, privately and publicly held corporations, financial institutions, retail operators, and
any other entity that for any purpose handles, collects, disseminates, or otherwise deals with
nonpublic personal information. A security breach occurs upon “unauthorized acquisition of
computerized data that compromises the security, confidentiality or integrity” of personal
information.

Personal information means an individual’s first name or first initial and last name, in
combination with any one or more of the following data elements, when either the name or the
data elements are not encrypted or redacted: Social Security number; driver’s license or state
identification card number; account number, or credit or debit card number, in combination with
any required security code, access code, or password that would permit access to the individual’s
financial account; or medical information. Publicly available information is not included.

The disclosure notification must be made in the most expedient time possible and without
unreasonable delay, consistent with the needs of law enforcement and any measures necessary to
determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable integrity, security, and

Illinois - 7
confidentiality of the data system. Notification can be provided to the affected persons by mail
or e-mail. If the cost of providing regular notice would exceed $250,000, the amount of people
to be notified exceeds 500,000, or the data collector does not have sufficient contact information,
substitute notice may be provided. When substitute notice is used, it must consist of all of the
following, as applicable: e-mail notice, conspicuous posting on the data collector’s web site, and
notification to major statewide media.
Statute: §815 ILCS 530:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2702&ChapAct=815%26nbsp%3BILCS%
26nbsp%3B530%2F&ChapterID=67&ChapterName=BUSINESS+TRANSACTIONS&ActNam
e=Personal+Information+Protection+Act%2E

“Security Breach Notification Fact Sheet”:


http://www.ag.state.il.us/consumers/breach_notification.pdf

State Resources:

Office of the Attorney General: “Identity Theft”


(http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/hotline.html)

“Identity Theft Resource Guide”


(http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/Identity_Theft_Resource_Guide.pdf)
This comprehensive 32-page document includes a checklist for victims, prevention tips, the ID
theft affidavit, and sample letters to credit agencies. It also explains how victims of identity theft
can clear their names of crimes they did not commit. It directs victims to: “FILE A REPORT
WITH YOUR LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENT. You should initiate a law enforcement
investigation by contacting the local law enforcement agency, which will take a police report of
the matter, provide you with a copy of that report, and begin an investigation of the facts or, if
the suspected crime was committed in a different jurisdiction, refer the matter to the law
enforcement agency where the suspected crime was committed. Illinois law requires police
departments to accept and provide reports. Get a copy of the police report or, at the very least,
the number of the report. It can help you deal with creditors who need proof of the crime.”

“Identity Theft Victim Kit” (http://www.ag.state.il.us/publications/pdf/victim.pdf)


This publication directs victims to: “Report the fraud to law enforcement – local and ational.
Identity theft is a felony under Illinois law. Report the fraud to your local police department as
soon as possible and get a copy of the police report. This will alert the police to the crime as well
as establish that you acted quickly. Make sure to get the police report, complaint number or
other similar record; you may need this information when contacting your creditors. Keep a
record of the police investigator’s phone number.”

“Identity Theft Brochure”


(http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/brochure_idtheft.pdf)
This brochure directs victims of identity theft to: “File a police report. Illinois law requires
police departments to accept and provide reports. Get a copy of the police report or, at the very
least, the number of the report. It can help you deal with creditors who need proof of the crime.”

Illinois - 8
“Identity Theft Hotline”: (http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/Id-Theft-
Poster.gif).
“The hotline provides Illinoisans who have been victimized by identity theft with one-on-one
assistance to take the steps necessary to report the crime to local law enforcement and financial
institutions, repair their credit, and prevent future problems.
If you have been the victim of identity theft or believe your personal or financial information may
have been compromised, please call the toll-free Identity Theft Hotline at: 1-866-999-5630 and
1-877-844-5461 (TTY).”

“Identity Theft Complaint Form”:


http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/consum_id_0106.pdf

Fact Sheets:
 “Consumer’s Checklist: Protecting Your Identity”
(http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/savvy_consumer_IDtheft.pdf)
 “Reporting Identity Theft as a Victim”
(http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/reportidtheft0404.pdf)
 “Protecting Your Social Security Number”
(http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/Social_Securit_%20Fact_Sheet.pdf
 “Credit Inquiries (http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/credit_inquiries.pdf)
 “Phishing” (http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/facts_on_phishing.pdf)
 “Defending Yourself Against Identity Thieves”
(http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/defendidtheft0404.pdf)

Legislation:

2008:
SB 2400 creates the Biometric Information Privacy Act that establishes guidelines for the
collection and storage of biometric data and the rights of those whose data is collected. The
legislation requires public agencies and private entities to inform a person in writing and to
receive that person’s consent before collecting biometric information. Biometrics images and
identifiers of the human body include fingerprints, hand geometry, an iris scan, a voice print, or
unique facial features.

In addition, the new law requires all public agencies and private entities collecting biometric
identifiers or information to establish a retention and destruction schedule. Under this schedule
biometric identifiers or information must be destroyed after the initial purpose of collecting or
obtaining the information has been fulfilled or within 3 years of the individual’s last interaction
with the agency or entity. It provides certain exemptions for public agencies, especially law
enforcement and prosecuting agencies and entities issuing driver’s licenses and permits.

HB 5586 requires county recorders to, on request, redact or remove personal information from
documents posted on the Internet. It also calls for any person or agency filing deeds with county
recorders to leave Social Security numbers off those documents. Those recorders offices without

Illinois - 9
an online database cannot display public documents on the Web until they have a policy in place
that addresses what steps they will take to protect residents' personal information. Within
twelve months, all county recorders will have to have a policy in place that details how they
address the question of protecting personal information.

2007:
HB 449 adds identity theft offenses committed in furtherance of the activities of an organized
gang to the definition of aggravated identity theft, which provides for enhanced penalties.

HB 1236 increases the penalties for identity theft by one class if the victim of the offense is an
active duty member of the Armed Services or Reserve Forces of the United States or of the
Illinois National Guard serving in a foreign country.

SB 137 prohibits phishing the act of posing as a legitimate company or government agency in an
email, Web page, or other Internet communication in order to trick a recipient into revealing his
or her personal information. It is unlawful for any person, by means of a Web page, electronic
mail message, or otherwise through use of the Internet, to solicit, request, or take any action to
induce another person to provide identifying information by representing himself, herself, or
itself to be a business without the authority or approval of the business. A person who is
engaged in the business or providing Internet access service to the public, owns a Web page, or
owns a trademark and is adversely affect by a phishing violation may bring an action against a
the violator to recover the greater of actual damages or $500,000. Individual victims may bring
an action to seek greater of three times the amount of actual damages or $5,000 per violation.

SB 1398 requires debt collectors to cease collection activities of a debt when an alleged debtor
provides a police report of identity theft and other proof of his status as an identity theft victim.
The debt collector must review and consider the information provided by the alleged victim and
may only recommence debt collection activities only after making a good faith determination
that the information does not establish that the information does not establish that the debtor is
not responsible for the specific debt in question. The debtor must be notified of this
determination. The bill also helps identity theft victims clear up their records by requiring debt
collectors who cease collection activities to notify the creditors and consumer credit reporting
agencies to which the collector previously provided adverse information.

2006:
HB 2310 allows all Illinois consumers to place a security freeze on their credit reports.
Previously, only victims of identity theft had the right to place such a freeze. To obtain a freeze,
a person must request one in writing by certified mail to the credit reporting agency. A security
freeze prohibits, with certain specific exceptions, the credit reporting agency from releasing the
consumer s credit report or any information from it without the express authorization of the
consumer. The credit reporting agency may charge up to $10 for each placing, removing or
temporary lifting of a security freeze. Senior citizens 65 years or older will not be charged to
place or permanently lift the security freeze, but may be charged up to $10 for each temporary
lifting of a security freeze. Victims of identity theft will not be charged any fees in connection
with the placing, removing, or temporary lifting of a security freeze.

Illinois - 10
HB 4297 increases the penalty for people convicted of identity theft who use the person
identification information or document of another to purchase methamphetamine material with
the intent to manufacture the drug. It will be a Class 2 felony for a first offense, and a Class 1
felony for a second or subsequent offense.

HB 4438 creates the offense of facilitating identity theft for state employees who do not properly
destroy documents that contain personal identifying information. A person commits the offense
when he or she has access to personal identifying information of another person and knowingly,
with the intent of committing identity theft, disposes of the information in any receptacle that the
public could gain access to without shredding or otherwise destroying the information. A first
violation is a class A misdemeanor (up to one year in county jail) and a second or subsequent
offense is a Class 4 felony (one to three years in prison).

SB 2554 targets the practice of “pretexting,” which occurs when someone pretends to be an
account holder, or to have authorization to access an account, to obtain private account
information. It makes it illegal for an identity thief to use somebody else's personal
identification information or personal identification document to portray himself or herself as
that person without permission, for the purpose of gaining access to any personal identification
information or personal identification document of that person. It also makes it illegal to use
personal identifying information to gain access to a person's transactions, actions or
communications such as cell phone call records.

The legislation also adds user names, passwords, and any other information used to access
information about an individual or their actions, transactions, or communications to the list of
information protected as personal identifying information. The first violation is a Class 3 felony,
punishable by two to five years in jail. If someone pretexts to get information about three or
more separate people within a 12-month period, it is a Class 2 felony, carrying a sentence of
three to seven years in jail. If a person is convicted of this crime, in the absence of proof of
actual damages, the identity theft victim may recover $2,000 in damages.

2005:
Under HB 1058, victims of identity theft will have the right to put a security freeze on their
credit file to prevent others from opening new accounts in their names. A security freeze enables
the consumer to prevent anyone from looking at his or her own credit reporting file for purposes
of granting credit unless the consumer chooses to let that particular business look at the
information. This gives the consumer control over who has access to the information needed to
process a credit application and prevents crooks from opening new accounts in the consumer’s
name. When the consumer is applying for credit, the freeze can be lifted temporarily so the
application can be processed.

The passage of HB 1663 made Illinois the second state (after California) to require companies to
quickly notify consumers in the state if their personal information is compromised due to a
breach in company security. The law requires any data collector that owns or licenses personal
information concerning an Illinois resident to notify the resident that there has been a breach of
the security of the system data following discovery or notification of the breach. The disclosure

Illinois - 11
notification would have to made in "the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable
delay." consistent with any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach.

HB 2699 increases the penalties by one felony class for identity theft and aggravated identity
theft crimes. This legislation also increases the penalties against those persons who steal the
identities of more than three victims.

HB 2696 prohibits businesses from denying a person credit or utility services, or from increasing
a person's credit limits based solely on their status as an identity theft victim.

HB 2697 makes unauthorized copying and transmitting of any financial transaction devices
including credit and debit cards, or other devices used to make a payment, get cash, or make a
deposit, a Class A misdemeanor.

HB 457 extends the statue of limitations and allows for the commencement of prosecution for
identity theft or aggravated identity theft within five years after the discovery of the offense by
the victim. Previously, the statute of limitations was one year and six months for a misdemeanor
identity theft offense and within three years for a felony identity theft crime or aggravated
identity theft offense.

HB 2700 allows for an identity theft prosecution to occur in either the county where the theft
occurred, the county where the information was illegally used, or where the victim resides.

2003:
SB 242 aims to give authorities more tools to fight the growing problem of identity theft. The bill
expands the legal definition of identity theft, which previously dealt only with the crime’s
financial aspects. Under one part of the new law, a person is guilty of committing identity theft if
he or she obtains, possesses, sells or manufactures someone else's personal identification
information or an identification document. Previously, the definition of identity theft only
addressed using someone else's identification information to fraudulently get credit, money or
other property. The new law also sets a broader definition for a “personal identifying document.”
The revised definition includes any government-issued document meant to identify a person. It
also includes documents issued by a quasi-governmental organization. First-time offenders of the
identity theft law could be found guilty of a Class 4 felony, generally punishable by one to three
years in prison. Subsequent offenses could draw stiffer punishment, a Class 3 felony and two to
five years in prison.

HB 2188 requires law enforcement agencies to take a police report from people in their
jurisdiction who have learned or reasonably suspect that his or her personal identifying
information has been unlawfully used by another. The agency must give the complainant a copy
of the report and begin an investigation. If the crime was committed in another jurisdiction, the
agency can refer the matter to the law enforcement agency where the crime was committed. The
bill also gives victims of identity theft a clear-cut legal procedure for clearing their names. The
bill also provides that a credit card company must verify any address on an application that does
not match the address previously attributed to that person’s name.

Illinois - 12

You might also like