TFL LUL Bulletin, October 2021
TFL LUL Bulletin, October 2021
SPECIAL BULLETIN
OCTOBER 2021
Girl walking across the tracks at Latimer Road after it was left
unstaffed by Fit for the Future job cuts
AND DRIVERS WITHOUT RIGHTS! more “flexibility” and “efficiency”, and “the present
agreements are a barrier to this”. Translated, this means:
the Framework Agreement has to go. The Framework,
whilst far from perfect, at least gives partial structure to
long-term ill-health. Add to that an increase in assaults
on staff and all management want to do is make more
job cuts and introduce a less “generous” Attendance at
Work policy. If we allow this to happen our stations will
shift patterns and allows some semblance of work/life become much worse places to work.
RMT is “London Underground’s best organised and Night Tube grade and forcing TO21 drivers to work
most militant trade union.” These are the words of through the night in passenger service. This has created
Oliver Gill, the Chief Business Correspondent at The
Telegraph, in an article about Prime Minister Johnson’s
plans for the Tube.
huge benefits for the company and equally huge
disbenefits for the drivers.
Management has a shopping list of “flexibility”
LU FLEET MAINTENANCE
The Telegraph has long been regarded as the – an innocent sounding word with very sinister Unfilled vacancies and use of agencies is preparation for job cuts
“house journal” of the Tory Party, and when they are connotations.
briefed that Johnson wants a “driverless” underground Being flexible could mean extending The recent announcement regarding TfL’s need to announced that they will not be filling vacancies. This
we must take the threat seriously. parameters, working out of more than one depot, save £900 million this year, as part of the funding deal all adds at up to more work and pressure on the staff
The article went on to say that Johnson has a changing shifts at short notice, overtime and rest day with the government means Fleet management have to deliver well maintained trains safely for the traveling
dream of “neutering the powerful RMT union” because working, changing rest days at short notice – the list already started to look at introducing a more casualised public to use.
it is recognised that the RMT is the only union with goes on. But they also want to save money by changing workforce by means of 350+ contractors or staff on But it won’t stop there, as a union we haven’t
the political will and industrial muscle to stop the the sick pay provisions, changing the Attendance at short term contracts. Management has also imposed been given the details but are sure LU are looking at:
wholescale destruction of our terms and conditions. Work and Discipline policies, reducing the size of pools Automatic Train Movements in areas of the network · Further extending maintenance across all fleets
Whether Johnson achieves driverless trains and the number of rostered spare turns. where various staff are walking about the track to carry · Wholesale changes to long established rosters and
is a matter of conjecture, but what is clear is that the Johnson and LUL believe they are on the front out their work. This is all part of the cuts agenda. agreements over leave and working practices
financial restraints he is placing on TfL are aimed at foot – it is up to us to prove them wrong. They can be Talk of an increase in e-learning will lead to an · Outsourcing of vital support activities such as Stores,
destroying the job as we know it. stopped, but it will be the battle of our lives and only by unsafe work-place and reducing the number of trainers. DMU and Admin
They have already started by abolishing the standing together will we win. This can only lead to one thing, a tragic accident. Fleet members will fight to maintain our core
On top of all this, Fleet management has work agreement and to safeguard jobs and conditions.
RMT will strike unless TfL withdraws demands for cuts
• TfL wants you to fund over £3bn of cuts to London’s transport system
• Hard won framework agreements and protection from casualised working are at risk
• Unfilled vacancies suggest massive job cuts in the pipeline
www.rmt.org.uk
RMT will not stand by and let it
defending our pension. happen.
TfL MEMBERS French Rail Unions
Successfully LU ENGINEERING GRADES
From Transformation to Financial Defend Privatisation and non-filling of vacancies
Sustainability: it’s all just an Retirement at 57 prepares job cuts in Engineering
excuse to attack jobs, pay, (or 52 for Drivers)
pensions and conditions RMT spoke with CGT branch
secretary (Paris) Matthieu, he
told us:
The pension system
in France was born in the
beginning of 20th Century,
after strikes of railway, bus and
underground workers, miners,
power-workers, and dockers.
After WW2, the
government from the resistance
against fascism created a public
and unified Social Security to
give pensions to all French
workers.
The present retirement
age in France is 62 for all but
it is 57 for the railway-workers
(SNCF) and the bus/metro
workers (RATP), power-workers
and dockers. For train drivers
the retirement age is 52.
President Macron tried to
change that to a retirement age
of 64 for all. Unions responded
with a huge general strike,
Following three years of Transformation from 2016 to 2019, which hit demonstrations and strong
thousands of staff who sit under LU & TfLs MATS Functional Councils, actions against the attacks and
the Covid pandemic has obviously given senior management the idea to defend our pension system!
that they now have carte blanche to carry out further culls to staffing Transport workers were
levels and pile even more of a work load onto those of us who will be at the head of the movement Management has run down engineering staffing killed? Signal maintenance such as boxes and points are
left behind to pick up the pieces....well it’s time to say a resounding and received strong support levels by failing to fill vacancies. This has undermined constantly under review. Less maintenance means fewer
NO. from our brothers and sisters promotion opportunities for years and LU have now staff and in case you do not get it, that means YOUR
We won’t accept this and we will fight! all over the world, including come clean saying they want to remove those jobs JOB GONE.
It’s time to stand up to the scores of directors and senior the British RMT and the World completely and use fixed term contracts to fill future When London Underground privatised us into
management who just keeping making the working lives of us integral Federation of Trade-Unions positions. Some 540 non-permanent workers already Metronet and Tubelines under the failed PPP model,
core workers more difficult. (WFTU). maintain the lines. This is a huge number of staff, yet we organised and we got stronger. We upped our
It is us who actually keep the underground operating everyday After two months of there is no money to recruit for our direct staff! At the game and forced the fat cats into numerous hard-won
as we all did throughout this dreadful pandemic. We have to tell strikes and class actions, in the same time, the private companies are laughing all the agreements. LUL want to review and combine these
management, in no uncertain terms, enough is enough! beginning of the Covid situation way to the bank. now as part of their drive for ‘cost savings’.
Management wants to get rid of real face to face training and in France, the government We are constantly fighting against unsafe The Martini model of employment, meaning
replace it with more e-training or virtual training. This would be the 3rd decided to take off its bill: The changes to standards that affect our safety inspections anytime, any place, anywhere means being flexible, as
cull of trainers in the last six years. French working class officially and maintenance regimes. We used to patrol the LUL put it. But for us it will mean misery, despair and
Our hard-working admin staff all around the business won!!! track daily, then up to every three days, then a week cuts. We will not be shaken but we will be stirred into
have already been treated appallingly over the past five years with Of course, we know that in depots. The relentless push to do more with fewer action. We will give not one inch or leave any stone
enforced location moves, new ways of working (which don’t work), and the bosses and the government people. What next, patrol once every four weeks on a unturned to defend what is ours and what we have won
relocation into hubs with increased workloads. still want to destroy our pension risk assessment and probability that people will not be previously.
These members will once again be in the firing line to cop even system and our Social Security,
more work kindly handed down from above. but this victory shows us that RMT members working for subcontractors of TfL are also in the firing line
The new round of cuts will be impacting on TfL, LUL, it's possible to fight and win to
contractors and all grades. RMT’s message to the MATS members is defend our class interests. Cleaners, protection staff, catering members, security guards and engineering contractors will
clear... if we all stick together and all say NO to the attacks on all of our Long live CGT, long live all be expected to do more for less as TfL squeezes the contracts. The only people you can be sure
hard earned & fought for terms & conditions, they will have to listen to RMT: solidarity forever! won’t lose out are the senior managers in both TfL and the contracting companies.
us.
FIGHT TO SAVE YOUR PENSION
Why is the TfL pension so important?
Pensions are deferred wages that form part of your mercy of financial markets at the time you retire.
contractual wages and conditions. The current State RMT has recently carried out some research
Pension Age (SPA) for most workers is between age into DB versus DC and what we have found is that if a
66 or 67 and is set to increase to age 68 for anyone member was to contribute the level of contributions
born after 1978. The current single persons Basic into a DC arrangement (5%) for 20 years they would
State Pension is £179.60 a week (£9,339 a year). So receive less than one-third of the pension they would
if you are thinking that you won’t be able to work have received had they been a member of the TfL
into your late 60s and there is no way you can afford Pension Fund.
to live on £179.60 a week, you are going to need TfL has commissioned a laughingly misnamed
to make sure that we maintain our TfL occupational independent report into our pension. Rather than be
scheme. independent though, it starts from the completely
The TfL pension fund currently has unjustified position that our final salary pension is,
approximately 26,000 contributing members, 32,500 “expensive, outdated and must be reformed”. This is
pensioners, 16,800 deferred members and assets to the nonsense of course. The Independent view is nothing
value of £10.5bn. The importance of the fund should more than politically motivated and is timed to take
not be understated when considering not only the level advantage of the financial situation TfL finds itself in.
of benefits you will receive at retirement but also the It is unacceptable that workers are being asked to
protection members of the fund receive in respect of ill balance the books by potentially losing some of their
health and death in service benefits. At present the fund future pension rights.
is 98% funded. There is no justification for changing its RMT will fight against any attempt to make
terms. us pay more contributions, cut the pension payout or
The TfL Pension Fund is what is known as a restrict who can be in the fund.
Defined Benefit (DB) arrangement and members of The closure of the TfL Pension Fund to new
the fund are given a “promise” that they will receive a members in our experience will result in more financial
certain level of pension at retirement which is based pressure being placed on TfL as the TfL Pension Fund
on their contributary service and their final salary becomes underfunded. The maths is simple as more
before retirement. This is simply known as a final salary members retire or leave LUL, and fewer members join,
promise. Having this promise allows members to this results in lower contributions coming into the fund
accurately plan for their retirement. which then places more strain on the employer to meet
Our pension scheme gives members a better benefit any shortfall. This often results in further benefit changes
outcome at retirement than career average schemes as employers try to balance the books.
and a much better outcome than Defined Contribution This scenario has been played out across many
(DC) schemes. DB pension schemes leaving members in poverty in
The level of pension at retirement in a DC their retirement. But RMT will not go along with the lies
pension scheme is dependent on the amount of that say Britain in the 21st century can no longer afford
contributions paid into an individual’s ‘pension pot’ and to pay decent pensions.
the investment returns during the run up to retirement. Britain remains a wealthy country and we will
The level of pension at retirement depends on the size of never accept the impoverishment of our members just
the pension pot built up before retirement so you at the to cut costs for the bosses.