0% found this document useful (0 votes)
337 views3 pages

Phạm Thị Yến Ngọc IELSIU19215 Homework 4a

As with any business, the goal is profitable growth. What makes retail management unique are the blurred lines between customers, suppliers, products, and the business itself. Let’s take a closer look at how a strategic approach to retail management can benefit both your company and your customers.

Uploaded by

Nguyễn Quỳnh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
337 views3 pages

Phạm Thị Yến Ngọc IELSIU19215 Homework 4a

As with any business, the goal is profitable growth. What makes retail management unique are the blurred lines between customers, suppliers, products, and the business itself. Let’s take a closer look at how a strategic approach to retail management can benefit both your company and your customers.

Uploaded by

Nguyễn Quỳnh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

School of Industrial Engineering & Management (IEM) Inventory Management

International University, VNU-HCM Instructor: Dr. Nguyen Van Hop

Homework 4_ Chapter 4
Deadline: Class Day next week
Name: Phạm Thị Yến Ngọc
Student ID: IELSIU19215

I. Problem statement: Single item – Probabilistic demand


1. Continuous review: Base stock model
¿
- Method: Approximate base stock R¿ satisfying a specific service level G( R ) . Order Q=1 when
inventory position drops to r =R−1
- Assumption: Demand is probabilistic (randomly varying and unknown), inventory is refilled one unit at
a time, consider service level and backorder level.
- Given: demand distribution with mean E( X) and standard deviation σ , economic costs (holding,
setup/ordering cost, unit variable cost) and consider service level and understock/backorder cost.
- Decision variable: Base stock R¿ (always keep the inventory position at that level)
2. Continuous review: Order quantity – Reorder point (Q , s) model given service level (service
constraint)
- Assumption: Demand is probabilistic, consider service aspect (given either probabilistic of not stockout
α or proportion of demand met from stock β which are type1 and type2 service constraint), lead time can
be deterministic or probabilistic. Shortage cost is hard to compute.
- Given: Demand rate, demand distribution, lead time (constant or varying), economic data (fixed cost,
annual holding cost, unit cost), either probabilistic of not stockout α or proportion of demand met from
stock β .
- Method: Approximate reorder point s that satisfies a specific service level and order quantity Q=EOQ
(note that for type2, we can use a specific equation to solve for more accurate Q ¿. Policy: Order quantity
Q when inventory position drops to s
- Decision variable: Optimal order quantity Q ¿ and reorder point s.
3. Continuous review: Order quantity – Reorder point (Q , s) model given shortage cost (cost
minimization)
- Assumption: Demand is probabilistic, consider backorder or stockout (lost sales) case, lead time can be
deterministic or probabilistic
- Given: Demand rate, demand distribution, lead time (constant or varying), economic data (fixed cost,
annual holding cost, unit cost) , cost per stockout for the case of lost sales, unit backorder cost for
backorder case)
- Method: Approximate reorder point s and order quantity Q by iterative procedure based on cost
minimization. Order quantity Q when inventory position drops to s
- Decision variable: Optimal order quantity Q and reorder point s
¿

4. Continuous review: Order – up – to level – Reorder point( S , s) model: The same as (Q , s) but
order – up – to level S will be decision variable (instead of Q ¿
5. Periodic review: Periodic review interval – Order – up – to level ( R , S ) model
- Method: Place an order to make the inventory position up to level S every R periods. Decision is made
by cost minimization method.
- Assumption: Demand is probabilistic, consider shortage case
- Given: Demand rate, demand distribution, lead time (constant or varying), economic data (fixed cost,
holding cost, unit cost and shortage cost), reorder/review interval R
- Decision variable: Order – up – to level S

Homework

Problem 1: Monthly demand for Toy model at a Best Buy Store is normally distributed, with a
mean of 35 units and a standard deviation of 10 units. If backorder occurs, the store must pay
$65 for each toy model instead of $40. Assume that the carrying rate r = 35% per month.
Calculate the base stock level? Safety stock level?
= 35 units
 = 10 units
b= $ 25
r = 35% => h= $14
R =?
s=?
¿ b 25
G ( R )= = 0.64
h+ b 25+14
since Φ ( 0.36 )=0.64, z =0.36 and hence
R* =  + z= 35 +0.36*10= 38.6 = 39, therefore base stock level is 39
Safety stock = s = r - = 38 -35 =3 units

Problem 2: An ophthalmologist’s office operates 52 weeks per year, 6 days a week. It purchases
disposable contact lenses for $11.70 per pair and sells for $50. Demand is 90 pairs per week.
Order cost is $54 per order. Annual interest rate is 27%. Lead-time is 3 weeks. Standard
deviation of weekly demand is 15 pairs. Given that 98% service-level. Assume demand is
normally distributed.
a. Find a reorder point – Order quantity (Q, s) policy for this situation
b. Find average order frequency of the policy (a)
c. Clearly identify different types of stocks: cycle, safety and pipeline
d. Assume that lead time is probabilistic, normally distributed with mean 3 weeks and
variance 0.2 weeks, determine the reorder point – Order quantity (Q,s) policy.
(Supplement definition: Cycle stock: average inventory on hand, at any point. Safety stock:
inventory kept on hand to allow demand uncertainty. Pipeline stock: goods in transit between
levels of multi-echelon distribution system or between adjacent workstations in factory (mean
demand during lead time)
D = 90 pairs/ week= 4680 pairs/ year
c=50$
h= 11,7*0.27=3.159$/units/ year
A= $54
L= 3weeks=3/52 year
t = 15 pairs => L=t *sqrt(L) =15√ 3
S(Q,r) = 98%
a. r=?
2∗4680∗54
Q*=
b
√ 3 .159
= 400 unit

=G( r)=0.98
b+h
since Φ ( 2.05 ) =0.98 , so z=2.05
=(4680*3)/52=270
r*=+ z= 270+2.05*15√ 3 =323.26
D 4680
b. The number of order per year is : F(Q)= = =11.7 ≈12 orders
Q 400
c. Safety stock : SS= r-= 323—270= 53 pairs
Cycle stock= Q/2= 200 pairs
Pipeline stock = 3* 90=270 pairs
d. Assume that lead time is probabilistic, normally distributed with mean 3 weeks and variance 0.2
weeks, determine the reorder point – Order quantity (Q,s) policy.
r* =E(D).E(L)+z* E ( L )∗Var ( D )+ E ( D )2∗Var ( L ) =2 . 05 √ 3∗152 +902∗0 .2 +90*3=368.2

Problem 3: Assume weekly demand follows normal distribution N(100,32). Given fixed cost A =
$200/order, unit cost c = $40/unit, carrying rate r = 0.1 $/$/yr, backorder cost b = 30 $/unit, lead
time L = 2 weeks.
a. Using iteratively method to find a reorder point – Order quantity (Q, s) policy for this
case?

You might also like