Constructivism as a theory for teaching and

learning
By Saul McLeod, published 2019

What is constructivism?

Constructivism is ‘an approach to learning that holds that people actively construct or make their
own knowledge and that reality is determined by the experiences of the learner’ (Elliott et al.,
2000, p. 256).

In elaborating constructivists’ ideas Arends (1998) states that constructivism believes in personal
construction of meaning by the learner through experience, and that meaning is influenced by the
interaction of prior knowledge and new events.

What are the principles of constructivism?

Knowledge is constructed, rather than innate, or passively absorbed

Constructivism's central idea is that human learning is constructed, that learners build new
knowledge upon the foundation of previous learning.

This prior knowledge influences what new or modified knowledge an individual will construct
from new learning experiences (Phillips, 1995).
Learning is an active process

The second notion is that learning is an active rather than a passive process.

The passive view of teaching views the learner as ‘an empty vessel’ to be filled with knowledge,
whereas constructivism states that learners construct meaning only through active engagement
with the world (such as experiments or real-world problem solving).

Information may be passively received, but understanding cannot be, for it must come from
making meaningful connections between prior knowledge, new knowledge, and the processes
involved in learning.
All knowledge is socially constructed

Learning is a social activity - it is something we do together, in interaction with each other,

rather than an abstract concept (Dewey, 1938).
For example, Vygotsky (1978), believed that community plays a central role in the process of
"making meaning." For Vygotsky, the environment in which children grow up will influence
how they think and what they think about.

Thus, all teaching and learning is a matter of sharing and negotiating socially constituted
knowledge.

For example, Vygotsky (1978) states cognitive development stems from social interactions from
guided learning within the zone of proximal development as children and their partner's co-
construct knowledge.
All knowledge is personal

Each individual learner has a distinctive point of view, based on existing knowledge and values.

This means that same lesson, teaching or activity may result in different learning by each pupil,
as their subjective interpretations differ.

This principle appears to contradict the view the knowledge is socially constructed.

Fox (2001, p. 30) argues (a) that although individuals have their own personal history of
learning, nevertheless they can share in common knowledge, and (b) that although education is a
social process, powerfully influenced by cultural factors, nevertheless cultures are made up of
sub- cultures, even to the point of being composed of sub-cultures of one. Cultures and their
knowledge-base are constantly in a process of change and the knowledge stored by individuals is
not a rigid copy of some socially constructed template. In learning a culture, each child changes
that culture.
Learning exists in the mind

The constructivist theory posits that knowledge can only exist within the human mind, and that it
does not have to match any real world reality (Driscoll, 2000).

Learners will be constantly trying to develop their own individual mental model of the real world
from their perceptions of that world.

As they perceive each new experience, learners will continually update their own mental models
to reflect the new information, and will, therefore, construct their own interpretation of reality.

What are the three main types of constructivism?

Typically, this continuum is divided into three broad categories: Cognitive constructivism based
on the work of Jean Piaget, social constructivism based on the work of Lev Vygotsky, and
radical constructivism.
According to the GSI Teaching and Resource Center (2015, p.5):

Cognitive constructivism states knowledge is something that is actively constructed by learners

based on their existing cognitive structures. Therefore, learning is relative to their stage of
cognitive development.

Cognitivist teaching methods aim to assist students in assimilating new information to existing
knowledge, and enabling them to make the appropriate modifications to their existing intellectual
framework to accommodate that information.

According to social constructivism learning is a collaborative process, and knowledge develops

from individuals' interactions with their culture and society. Social constructivism was developed
by Lev Vygotsky (1978, p. 57) who suggested that,

Every function in the child's cultural development appears twice: first, on the social level and,
later on, on the individual level; first, between people (interpsychological) and then inside the
child (intrapsychological).

The notion of radical constructivism was developed by Ernst von Glasersfeld (1974) and states
that all knowledge is constructed rather than perceived through senses.

Learners construct new knowledge on the foundations of their existing knowledge. However,
radical constructivism states that the knowledge individuals create tells us nothing about reality,
and only helps us to function in your environment. Thus, knowledge is invented not discovered.

The humanly constructed reality is all the time being modified and interacting to fit ontological
reality, although it can never give a ‘true picture’ of it. (Ernest, 1994, p. 8)

Constructivist approaches to teaching

Constructivist learning theory underpins a variety of student-centered teaching methods and
techniques which contrast with traditional education, whereby knowledge is simply passively
transmitted by teachers to students.
What is the role of the teacher in a constructivist classroom?

The primary responsibility of the teacher is to create a collaborative problem-solving

environment where students become active participants in their own learning.

From this perspective, a teacher acts as a facilitator of learning rather than an instructor.

The teacher makes sure he/she understands the students' preexisting conceptions, and guides the
activity to address them and then build on them (Oliver, 2000).
Scaffolding is a key feature of effective teaching, where the adult continually adjusts the level of
his or her help in response to the learner's level of performance.

In the classroom, scaffolding can include modeling a skill, providing hints or cues, and adapting
material or activity (Copple & Bredekamp, 2009).
What are the features of a constructivist classroom?

Tam (2000) lists the following four basic characteristics of constructivist learning environments,
which must be considered when implementing constructivist teaching strategies:

1) Knowledge will be shared between teachers and students.

2) Teachers and students will share authority.

3) The teacher's role is one of a facilitator or guide.

4) Learning groups will consist of small numbers of heterogeneous students.

Traditional Classroom Constructivist Classroom

Strict adherence to a fixed curriculum is highly Pursuit of student questions and interests is
valued. valued.
Learning is interactive, building on what the
Learning is based on repetition.
student already knows.
Teacher-centered. Student-centered.
Teachers disseminate information to students; Teachers have a dialogue with students, helping
students are recipients of knowledge (passive students construct their own knowledge (active
learning). learning).
Teacher's role is interactive, rooted in
Teacher's role is directive, rooted in authority.
negotiation.
Students work primarily alone (competitive). Students work primarily in groups (cooperative).

What are the pedagogical (i.e. teaching) goals of constructivist classrooms?

Honebein (1996) summarizes the seven pedagogical goals of constructivist learning

environments:

1) To provide experience with the knowledge construction process (students determine how they
will learn).

2) To provide experience in and appreciation for multiple perspectives (evaluation of alternative

solutions).

3) To embed learning in realistic contexts (authentic tasks).

4) To encourage ownership and a voice in the learning process (student centered learning).
5) To embed learning in social experience (collaboration).

6) To encourage the use of multiple modes of representation, (video, audio text, etc.)

7) To encourage awareness of the knowledge construction process (reflection, metacognition).

Brooks and Brooks (1993) list twelve descriptors of constructivist teaching behaviors:

 1. Encourage and accept student autonomy and initiative. (p. 103)

 2. Use raw data and primary sources, along with manipulative, interactive, and physical
materials. (p. 104)
 3. When framing tasks, use cognitive terminology such as “classify,” analyze,” “predict,”
and “create.” (p. 104)
 4. Allow student responses to drive lessons, shift instructional strategies, and alter
content. (p. 105)
 5. Inquire about students’ understandings of the concepts before sharing [your] own
understandings of those concepts. (p. 107)
 6. Encourage students to engage in dialogue, both with the teacher and with one another.
(p. 108)
 7. Encourage student inquiry by asking thoughtful, open-ended questions and
encouraging students to ask questions of each other. (p. 110)
 8. Seek elaboration of students’ initial responses. (p. 111)
 9. Engage students in experiences that might engender contradictions to their initial
hypotheses and then encourage discussion. (p. 112)
 10. Allow wait time after posing questions. (p. 114)
 11. Provide time for students to construct relationships and create metaphors. (p. 115)
 12. Nurture students’ natural curiosity through frequent use of the learning cycle model.
(p. 116)

Critical evaluation
Strengths

Constructivism promotes a sense of personal agency as students have ownership of their learning
and assessment.
Limitations

x
Remaining Time -0:00
Constructivism as a theory for teaching and learning video

The biggest disadvantage is its lack of structure. Some students require highly structured learning
environments to be able to reach their potential.
It also removes grading in the traditional way and instead places more value on students
evaluating their own progress, which may lead to students falling behind, as without
standardized grading teachers may not know which students are struggling.