0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views5 pages

Cisco Spine Leaf

The document discusses Cisco's ACI spine-leaf architecture for data centers. A spine-leaf topology uses a two-tier design with leaf switches connecting to end devices like servers, and spine switches providing a backbone interconnect between the leaf layers. This provides high bandwidth and low latency connectivity between devices. Layer 3 routing is used between the leaf and spine layers, removing the need for spanning tree protocol and allowing for predictable performance and scalability. However, this isolation of VLANs between leaf switches can cause issues for workloads requiring server mobility.

Uploaded by

Masih Fava
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views5 pages

Cisco Spine Leaf

The document discusses Cisco's ACI spine-leaf architecture for data centers. A spine-leaf topology uses a two-tier design with leaf switches connecting to end devices like servers, and spine switches providing a backbone interconnect between the leaf layers. This provides high bandwidth and low latency connectivity between devices. Layer 3 routing is used between the leaf and spine layers, removing the need for spanning tree protocol and allowing for predictable performance and scalability. However, this isolation of VLANs between leaf switches can cause issues for workloads requiring server mobility.

Uploaded by

Masih Fava
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

• Cisco ACI- Spine-Leaf Architecture

Today I am going to talk about the Cisco ACI architecture which is new Technology Architecture
from Cisco side in Data Center space.

New Technology in data-center comes into picture in the form of spine-leaf topology where we can
have the east west traffic to be propagate in the equidistance.

Spine-Leaf Architecture:
Spine-Leaf topologies are based at the near community structure. The time period originates from
Charles Clos at Bell Laboratories, who posted a paper in 1953 describing a mathematical theory of a
multi pathing, non-blockading, more than one-level community topology wherein to replace
smartphone calls.

Spine-leaf is typically deployed as two layers: spines (like an aggregation layer), and leaves (like an
get right of entry to layer). spine-leaf topologies provide excessive-bandwidth, low-latency, non-
blocking server-to-server connectivity.

Fig 1.1- Cisco Spine-Leaf Architecture


Differentiation:
Leaf (aggregation) switches are what offer devices get entry to the material (the network of spine
and Leaf switches) and are generally deployed on the top of the rack. typically, gadgets connect with
the Leaf switches. gadgets may include servers, Layer four - 7 services (firewalls and cargo
balancers), and WAN or net routers.

Leaf switches do not connect with different leaf switches (until jogging vPC in standalone NX-OS
mode). however, each leaf should hook up with each spine in a full mesh. some ports on the leaf can
be used for cease devices (commonly 10 Gigabits), and some ports might be used for the spine
connections (commonly forty Gigabits).


Fig 1.2 Stages of the Leaf-Spine Network( Networks-baseline)

Spine Topology:-
Spine (aggregation) switches are used to hook up with all Leaf switches, and are typically deployed
at the stop or middle of the row. spine switches do not connect with different backbone switches.
Spines function backbone interconnects for Leaf switches. typically, spines best connect with leaves,
but when integrating a Cisco Nexus 9000 transfer into an current surroundings it's miles perfectly
applicable to connect other switches, services, or devices to the spines.

All devices connected to the cloth are an same range of hops away from one another. This gives you
predictable latency and high bandwidth among servers. The diagram in determine 6 indicates a easy
two-tier design.


Fig 1.3 Design in Data-center ( Networks-Baseline )

How we achieve this:-


With Leaf-spine configurations, all gadgets are exactly the equal quantity of segments away and
comprise a predictable and consistent quantity of put off or latency for touring statistics. this is
possible because of the brand new topology design that has best two layers, the Leaf layer and
backbone layer.

The Leaf layer includes access switches that connect with devices like servers, firewalls, load
balancers, and side routers. The backbone layer which is called as spine (made of switches that
perform routing) is the spine of the network, where each Leaf switch is interconnected with each and
each backbone transfer.
Fig 1.4 Layer 3 Spine-Leaf Fabric

To allow for the predictable distance between devices on this -layered design, dynamic Layer three
routing is used to interconnect the layers. Dynamic routing allows the exceptional direction to be
determined and altered primarily based on responses to community trade.
This type of network is for records center architectures with a focal point on “East-West” network site
visitors. “East-West” visitors carries information designed to travel within the statistics middle itself
and now not outdoor to a one-of-a-kind site or network.
This new method is a method to the intrinsic barriers of Spanning Tree with the capacity to utilize
different networking protocols and methodologies to obtain a dynamic community.

Fig 1.5 Core Fabric ( Networks-Baseline)

Rest of the Story:-


With Leaf-spine, the network makes use of Layer three routing. All routes are configured in an active
country via using identical-value Multipath (ECMP). This lets in all connections to be applied on the
equal time while still last solid and averting loops within the network.

With traditional Layer 2 switching protocols like Spanning Tree on three-tiered networks, it ought to
be configured on all devices efficaciously and all the assumptions that Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)
is predicated on need to be taken into account (one of the smooth errors to make when configuring
STP is with mislabeling device priorities that could lead to an inefficient route setup).
The removal of STP between the get entry to and Aggregation layers in lieu of Layer three routing
consequences in a miles greater strong surroundings.

Every other gain is the convenience of adding additional hardware and capability. when
oversubscription of links occurs (which means that more visitors is generated than may be
aggregated onto the lively link at one time), the capacity to make bigger potential is simple. an
additional spine switch may be added and uplinks can be prolonged to each Leaf transfer, ensuing
inside the addition of interlayer bandwidth and reduction of the oversubscription.

Whilst device port potential turns into an issue, a new Leaf switch may be added by way of
connecting it to each spine and adding the community configuration to the switch. the convenience
of growth optimizes the IT department’s procedure of scaling the community with out dealing with or
disrupting the Layer 2 switching protocols.

Leaf-Spine Worries:
The alternative principal drawback comes from the use of Layer three routing. This eliminates the
spanning of VLANs (digital LAN) throughout a network.
VLANs in a Leaf-spine network are localized to each person Leaf switch; any VLAN segments which
are left on a Leaf switch are not reachable through the alternative Leaf's. this could create troubles
with a scenario inclusive of guest virtual system mobility inside a statistics middle.

Leaf-Spine Cases:
web scale packages where server area within the network is static could benefit from the
implementation of Leaf-backbone. the use of Layer 3 routing among layers of the structure does no
longer avoid net scale programs because they do not require server mobility.
The removal of Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) results in a greater stable and dependable community
overall performance of East-West traffic flows. Scalability of the structure is likewise improved.

Organization packages leveraging cellular digital machines (e.g. vMotion) create an trouble while a
server wishes to be supportable anywhere inside the records middle. the use of Layer three routing
and shortage of VLANs extending among Leaf's breaks this requirement.

To paintings round this trouble, an answer such as software program defined Networking (SDN) may
be employed, which creates a virtual Layer 2 above/on pinnacle of the Leaf-backbone network. This
lets in servers to transport around in the environment with impunity at no detriment to “East-West”
overall performance, scalability, and stability attributes of a Leaf-backbone community topology.

You might also like