Smart Water Management - 2-1
Smart Water Management - 2-1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Access to improved drinking water has long been recognized as one of the main challenges
of development. One of the targets of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) is to reduce by
half the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water by 2015. Achieving
this objective is likely to represent an even greater challenge than in other regions of the world. A
crucial challenge in improving the coverage of water services in poor countries is the financing of
investment in water production and distribution capacity. This issue has received considerable
attention among the development community (see e.g. World Water Council, 2006). The issue of
water tariffs and subsidies has perhaps received less attention, although it is also crucial to the
matter. This paper focuses on water tariffs and subsidies, both from a normative and a positive side.
The aim of the paper is to present a basic conceptual framework for understanding the main
practical issues and challenges relating to tariffs and subsidies in the water sector in developing
countries. It introduces the basic economic notions relevant to the water sector; presents an
analytical framework for assessing the need for and evaluating subsidies; and discusses the recent
evidence on the features and performance of water tariffs and subsidies in various regions, with a
special focus. The discussion is limited to the provision of drinking water to urban households in
developing countries. Among the issues examined. What are the main questions that arise when
governments want to subsidize access to and consumption of water. What are the key features of
water tariffs and subsidies that have been implemented around the world . How can we assess the
performance of various subsidy programs. How well have subsidies performed in practice. Rather
than in producing new messages, the value added of the paper lies in its bringing together concepts
and evidence from distinct fields of literature. On the one hand, theoretical publications on utility
tariffs and subsidies have focused heavily on optimal incentive schemes for utility management as
well as broader regulatory issues (see Joskow, 2005, for a synthesis). On the other hand, empirical
publications, mostly from development institutions, tend to focus on specific projects or countries
and do not necessarily make explicit links or references to the theory. In the middle, the public
finance-oriented literature, which has been used to provide analytical frameworks for the evaluation
of subsidies in various sectors such as education and housing, has rarely been used in the context of
water provision. This paper, by bringing together those three strands of literature, aims at offering
practitioners a compact and unified framework to think about tariffs and subsidies in the water
sector. Among various sources, the paper relies on two recent studies. The first one, published in
2005 by Paul Joskow, reviews the theoretical underpinnings of water cost structure and tariffs
(Joskow, 2005) and their implications for regulation. The second one, published in 2005 by the
World Bank, carefully reviews most of the existing studies of water tariffs and subsidies in
developing countries, with a view to assess their performance in targeting the poor (Komives et al,
2005). The reader is referred to these two comprehensive papers for a more complete treatment of
some the issues examined. 1 Broader problems of water allocation across sectors, in which tariffs
play an important role, are not elaborated upon. However, it should be kept in mind that allocation
of water between sectors has been and remains a pervasive policy issue, in developing and
developed countries alike. Inefficient allocations sustained by distorted prices or subsidies to, e.g.
agricultural water use, may generate waste of water and/or unsustainable water consumption. The
problem is exacerbated in countries or regions where water is scarce. In those circumstances, re-
allocation of the available water supply between customers may already go a long way to
alleviating water scarcity problems; and getting incentives right for an efficient use of water by
different users may prove to be the most urgent question to tackle. The paper is constructed as
follows. I Introduces the framework of drinking water provision in developing countries. It
introduces the various ways by which water is supplied, the variety of water providers, as well as
the institutional setting in which water distribution takes place. It then briefly recapitulates the
economics behind costs and tariffs in the water sector, with an emphasis on utilities. In water
subsidies are introduced. This section also presents public economics criteria by which subsidy
programs may be evaluated. Examines the performance of tariffs and subsidies, as analyzed from
real cases. The final section of the paper briefly attempts to draw some lessons from the review of
evidence undertaken in the previous sections.
The resultant economic and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the
sustainability of vital ecosystems.‖ The total availability of water resources is currently under stress
due to climatic changes, and continuous increase in water demand linked to the global population
increase. A Smart Water Grid (SWG) is a two-way real time network with sensors and devices that
continuously and remotely monitor the water distribution system. Smart water meters can monitor
many different parameters such as pressure, quality, flow rates, temperature, and others. A review
of the benefits of Smart Water Grids is presented in the context of water conservation and efficient
management of scarce water resources. The pros and cons of a Smart Water Grid are discussed in
the context of aging infrastructure. Current distribution systems have large leakage rates. Locating
leaks, missing, and/or illegal connections can lead to increase in revenue. Updating or replacing
parts of the current infrastructure can be very expensive. SWG cannot substitute for basic water
infrastructure. However, these costs could eventually be offset by savings obtained from their
implementation. Setbacks include higher costs and a lack of economic incentives. In some cases, a
lack of public awareness resulted in negative public opinion. Some citizens might be concerned
with health problems and ailments associated with wireless transmission of data. The reliability of
quantity and quality of water at the source is also discussed in relation to the network
vulnerabilities.
The interface of Smart Water Grids with natural systems such as rivers, lakes, and reservoirs
is also a key component of a ―smart‖ approach to the use of water resources. These natural
components are subjected to climate variability and single events can disrupt daily operations.
Floods, droughts, and disasters such as typhoons and forest fires can affect the water quality
at the source. Robust systems should have alternative supply sources when facing scarcity of
resources or changes in water quality/contamination. Deep understanding of the network
vulnerability and preparedness for disaster prevention may also contribute to the ―smart‖ reputation
of water distribution systems. Several projects worldwide have implemented Smart Water Grids
into their water distribution systems and have seen promising results.
These meters helped to monitor many variables, decrease water losses as well as promote
water conservation. Current water infrastructure is aging and deteriorating. Water networks are vast
and consist of various components (pipe segments, pumps, valves, etc). These components vary in
age, and material type. As they age their performance and efficiency decrease, making them prone
to failures and leaks. Ecological and economic sustainable Cities is a new initiative launched by the
World Bank, as an integral part of the World Bank Urban and Local Government Strategy, to help
cities in developing countries achieve greater ecological and economic sustainability. Urbanization
in developing countries may be the single greatest change in this century. What is Smart city? This
is an increasingly urban world. There is an urgent need to ensure that local governments have the
infrastructure in place to tackle the inevitable demographic challenges.
There remains a great desire for change, and city management must act now to improve
service delivery and streamline internal operations. To compete effectively at international level,
cities will need to become more intelligent, innovative, and integrated. A Smart City will increase
efficiency, productivity, ecological awareness; it will reduce pollution and improve quality of life in
a world of increasing urban complexity. Smart cities concept is pragmatic and balanced
combination of ecological, economical and other effective field for perfect sustainable
development. Ecological cities enhance the well-being of citizens and society through integrated
urban planning and management that fully harnesses the benefits of ecological systems, and
protects and nurtures these assets for future generations. Economic cities create value and
opportunities for citizens, businesses, and society by efficiently using all tangible and intangible
assets, and enabling productive, inclusive, and sustainable economic activity. Need of sustainability
in citiesThe developing countries will triple their built-up urban area between 2000 from 2030
400,000 square kilometers, constructed in just 30 years, equal the world‘s built-up urban area in
2000. One could say humans are building a whole new world at about 10 times the speed, in
countries with severe resource constraints—natural, fiscal, administrative, and technical. And they
are doing so in an increasingly globalized context with many new, constantly fluctuating,
interlinked, and uncontrollable variables.
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE SURVEY
According to a survey, it‘s observed that almost 32 billion m3 of treated water is being
wasted when it‘s being transported from one place to other through the distribution systems. Old
and poorly constructed pipelines, inadequate corrosion protection, unauthorized connection, poorly
maintained valves and mechanical damage are some of the factors contributing to leakage. If it is
possible to save this water, 200 million people can be provided with this water without further
treating. In order to collect more information on pipeline assets, WSN intends to collaborate with
laboratories to conduct destructive testing of exposed corroded pipes, so as to understand the
condition of similar pipelines in the vicinity. A database of soil data will also be built to develop a
corrosion model that takes soil corrosiveness into account when determining pipeline conditions.
Furthermore, WSN plans to install fibre-optic sensors along critical stretches of proposed pipelines
so as to develop the capability for real time monitoring of pipeline conditions by 2020. With the
incorporation of risk based, failure forecasting models into the asset management system, WSN
targets to annually identify the top 2 % high risk pipes for replacement by 2020 Mumbai, India
Mumbai is India‘s largest city with a population of 20 million people. Itron meters were installed in
the system that supplied tap water to half of the city‘s residents. By implementing these smart
meters, there was a 50 percent decrease in water losses (Itron Inc, 2013). The city was able to
identify leak locations as well as promote water conservation. This project exceeded the target‘s
goals and provided a higher quality water network. Other case studies done by this company can be
found on the Itron, Inc website. Water comes in three states: gaseous, liquid, and frozen. In its
liquid state, water meets our basic demands for plants, animals, and humans. The runoff from
precipitation feeds our ecosystems and recharges our water availability. A total of 980 billion
(US$14 billion) has been approved by the Indian Cabinet for development of 100 smart cities and
rejuvenation of 500 others. For the smart cities mission, 480 billion (US$7.1 billion) and for the
Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT), a total funding of 500 billion
(US$7.4 billion) has been approved by the Cabinet. In the 2014 Union budget of India, Finance
Minister Arun Jaitley allocated 70.16 billion (US$1.0 billion) for the 100 smart cities.
However, only 9.24 billion (US$140 million) could be spent out of the allocated amount till
February 2015. Hence, the 2015 Union budget of India allocated only 1.43 billion (US$21 million)
for the project. First batch of 20 cities selected in the second stage of competition will be provided
with central assistance of 2 billion (US$29 million) each during this financial year followed by 1
billion (US$15 million) per year during the next three years. The remaining money has to come
from the states, urban bodies and the consortium that they form with corporate entities. Also, 10 per
cent of budget allocation will be given to states / union territories as incentive based on
achievement of reforms during the previous year. Urban Development Ministry had earlier released
2 core (US$290,000) each to mission cities for preparation of Smart City Plan.
Most of pipelines are approximately 20–30 years of age, with an expected asset lifespan of
70 years. As WSN continues to lay more pipelines, the asset base grows, which translates to more
potential points of failure. WSN is adopting a proactive and systematic approach to manage the
asset base in order to optimize the lifespan of existing pipelines and pre-empt failures of critical
pipelines. To facilitate the implementation of the new asset management system, WSN will
leverage widely on condition assessment technologies to retrieve more dynamic and real time data.
The challenge is that pipelines are buried, lined & have undulating profiles. In addition, the network
is interconnected & ―live‖ 24/7 reliable supply is required. This makes it difficult to implement
condition assessment technologies on a large scale. However, once these challenges are
surmounted, these data can be uploaded into asset management software to improve the
identification of high-risk pipelines so that pipeline renewal works can be prioritized.
With a better understanding of the circumstances leading to pipe failures, WSN can also improve
pipeline designs to prevent future failures. Leveraging on a Smart Water Grid system for asset
management thus allows us to plan, design, operate and manage assets cost-effectively for safe and
reliable supply to customers. In India, the estimated sewage generation from Class I cities and Class
II towns (representing 72% of urban population) is 38,524 million litres/day (MLD), of which there
exists treatment capacity of only 11,787 MLD (about 30%).The 35 major metropolitan areas (with
population over 1 million) have a collective sewage treatment capacity of just over 50%, but high
variability exists among them. Only five metro cities have treatment capacity close to 100% of their
sewage generation, these are Hyderabad, Vadodara, Chennai, Ludhiana and Ahmedabad. Delhi has
the largest sewage treatment capacity in absolute terms, but it is only about 60% its needs, while
Mumbai has the second largest treatment capacity in absolute terms but meets only 80% of its
needs. Almost all other major metropolitan cities have treatment capacities below 50% of their
sewage generation. The 498 Class I cities (with population over 100,000) which account for 93% of
the urban sewage generated in the country, have a combined treatment capacity of about 32% of
generation, while the 410 Class II towns (population between 50,000 and 100,000) have a
combined treatment capacity of only 8% of their generation. The CPCB estimates that sewage
generation will increase from the present 38,000 MLD to more than 120,000 MLD by 2050.Water
and wastewater treatment market in India is currently worth ~€ 954M and is expected to grow at
~13% in the next 3-4 years. Out of the total wastewater generated ~65% of the wastewater
generated goes untreated, requiring imminent need for effective wastewater management. Only
~35% of the wastewater treatment needs are currently satisfied in India, while the balance 65% is
not satisfied at all. Yearly wastewater generated in India, ~36K MLD can submerge a state like
Andhra Pradesh. A 2010 report by the New Delhi based Centre for Science and Environment (CSE)
put the effective treatment capacity at only 19% of total sewage generation compared to an installed
capacity of 30%. A 2005 study by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) found that only
86% of the studied plants were operational, nearly 40% of the plants did not meet general discharge
standards, and the average capacity utilization was 72%4. A 2007 sample survey by the CPCB
classified the performance of only 10% as ―good‖, with 54% falling into the ―poor‖ and ―very
poor‖ categories.
3.1 On site challenges:
Analysis exhibits that macro factors such as FTA (Free Trade Agreement), cost sensitivity,
and varied climatic and usage considerations directly impact operations in India. There exists
immense opportunities for foreign companies owing to: Commercially viable advanced technology
Environmentally conforming solutions However, foreign companies need to overcome concern
such as:- Lack of Indian experience to meet tender requirements Different waste treatment
procedure In Europe treatment is done at source where as in India it is done at the end.The report
evaluates key challenges faced by foreign companies such as: Red Tapism, Lack of transparency,
fierce competition, Weak Implementation of IPR regulations, diverse technical standards, Complex
capital raising criteria, bureaucratic bottlenecks, Partner with a local company, Start the regulatory
process early.
CHAPTER 4
METHODOLOGIES
An attempt to analyze the components of the full cost of drinking water is being done
herein. The DC is separated into the processes which constitute the water cycle in urban water. Also
the MCC, its integration conditions in DC along with its contribution towards effective water
demand reduction are analyzed. Actual DC components are separated and reallocated. The
components of the urban water supply cycle are studied and how much their costs are related to
qualitative or quantitative degradation of the water. Until today many of these costs were hidden
inside the DC. This paper attempts to emphasize in these costs in accordance with the Polluter Pays
Principal to propose the proper assumption of responsibility. This new approach changes the value
of water in scarcity conditions because of the Economic Annual Real Losses appearance. The
importance of the damage avoidance cost that overrides damage repair cost is analyzed. The link
between the demand decreasing and quantitative damage avoidance occurs. The historic expansion
of the WDS's supplying capacity provides data about wrong decisions from utilities that had
qualitative and quantitative results in water resources, which increased the nowadays considered
operation costs. An analysis of the mechanism that finds the socially just value of water, formed and
balanced between the full water cost recovery (FWCR) and reducing water losses practices is
highlighted. Also the basic methodological framework for an integrated action plan (in terms of
successive steps) that will guarantee the reliable calculation of the FWC, as defined by the WFD
2000/60/EC is presented.DC includes the costs a water utility pays to provide water of sufficient
quantity and appropriate quality to its customers. These costs are the Operation and Maintenance
Costs, Administrative Costs, Other Costs (management related) and the Annual Equivalent Capital
Costs. Crucial parameters affecting the level of the DC and its components concern the necessary
waterworks and the way the water utility operates. The first category includes parameters related to
the characteristics of: a) the water resources being used; b) the water intake works; c) the water
aqueducts; d) the water treatment plants; e) the water storage tanks; and f) the water distribution
network. The second category includes parameters related to the way the water utility operates (e.g.
speed and quality of repair works). The latter are components of DC, but an analysis of each
component will prove that large portions of these should be considered part of the EC and the RC.
In a Water Distribution System (WDS), its capacity growth and expansion are critical aspects of its
planning, since the choice of the type, timing and size of new facilities affects the level of the
related FSC. What happens then is to build extra capacity to meet the increased demand. Usually
this extra capacity is consumed earlier due to the generated illusion of abundance. This forces the
next project for even bigger capacity to start earlier than expected (Kanakoudis, 2004). The control
efficiency of the timing stages of major new projects reveals that there are periods where the
capacity of e.g. a water delivery network is less than the actual water demand. During such periods,
there is an opportunity cost, the marginal capacity cost (MCC), to be considered (Griffin, 2001).
The costly decision to increase capacity may be delayed due to the integration of the MCC in the
water price leading to a fall in demand. Recognition of the problem leads to regular adjustments of
the water price levels due to a change in the MCC (Mann et al, 1980). Much of the water demand
literature is rooted in engineering rather than economics, and there is widespread belief among
water managers that consumers do not respond to price signals. This, in conjunction with low price
elasticity estimates in the literature, may have contributed to the predominant use of command-and-
control instruments in water demand management (Olmstead et al, 2007). A review of the literature
suggests that water demand is sensitive to price, but that the magnitude of that sensitivity is small at
current prices. If the MCC is not known, it is sufficient to know the elasticity of demand to estimate
the price increase that is needed to ‗freeze‘ the seasonal increase in demand. Increased peak
demand-related price levels can dramatically delay the investments for system capacity expansion,
compared to other more inefficient methods of billing. The definition of ED, will lead us to the
definition of EC. ED during a human activity or set of activities is caused when activities
themselves and their results reduce the level of environmental quality. It should be noted that is
required a strict determination of procedures causing the degradation of environmental quality and
their separation from the processes that cause degradation of the quantity of water resources. The
latter helps us to identify the RC which has to do with the nature of the procedures which reduce the
amount of water and generally overconsumption. Several consequences of ED have been
incorporated by water utilities and are counted under their DCs. According to the WFD, these costs
should be clarified, the already admeasured to DCs should be incorporated to EC and the EDs,
which are not counted until now, should be recorded and calculated. Thereafter, all the phases of
urban water supply and all the factors affecting the quality of drinking water are analyzed. The
suggesting methodology calculates the DC at a utility level. Under the new approach, the total
urban water supply cost is deconstructed into sub-costs such as water abstraction, supply, raw water
treatment, storage, distribution/use, sewage water treatment and deposition. The three types of FWC
at utility level are also deconstructed. DC includes eleven Operation and Maintenance Costs, and
three Capital Charges. Each one of those sub-costs has potential DC, RC and EC as to whether
incur due to quantitative or qualitative burden.
CHAPTER 5
SYESTEM DESCRIPTION
Statistical analysis of pressure and flow Statistical analysis of flows and pressures can be
carried out to reveal deviations that may indicate a new leak. However, water flow fluctuations can
be attributed to a variety of reasons such as seasonal variations and public holidays amongst other
causes. Thus, statistical analysis also needs to take other datasets into account to improve its
accuracy. As technology is advancing, new tools and techniques can be implemented to help
electric, gas, and water grids run more efficiently. There are several existing water infrastructure
monitoring methods: Automated Meter Reading (AMR), Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI),
and Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA).
Smart water grid consists of a two-way real time network with field sensors, measurement
and control devices that remotely and continuously monitor and diagnose problems in the water
system. Smart water meters can monitor some key parameters such as flow, pressure, temperature,
quality, consumption, and energy usage. The information gathered by these meters is wirelessly
transmitted to a tower, which then transmits this information to a utility company, or other central
location. Sensus developed FlexNetTM technology, which is designed specifically for smart grid
applications. Smart water meters communicate information several times a day. With smart water
meter technology, utilities are able to see real time consumption and performance of the distribution
system. Based on the information obtained from smart meters, utilities can further help analyze data
and identify unusual patterns or changes in the network. As a result, this would help prevent
impending failures, and decrease response time to occurred failures.
5.1 Block diagram
Fig-5.1 Block diagram for smart water management and leakage detection
A water rotor along with a hall effect sensor is present the sense and measure the water
flow. When water flows through the valve it rotates the rotor. By this, the change can be observed
in the speed of the motor. This change is calculated as output as a pulse signal by the h all effect
sensor. Thus, the rate of flow of water can be measured. The main working principle behind the
working of this sensor is the Hall effect. According to this principle, in this sensor, a voltage
difference is induced in the conductor due to the rotation of the rotor. This induced voltage
difference is transverse to the electric current. Water flow sensors can measure the rate of flow of
water either by measuring velocity or displacement. These sensors can also measure the flow of
water like fluids such as measuring milk in a dairy industry etc. There are various types of water
flow sensors available based on their diameter and method of measuring. A cost-effective and most
commonly used water flow sensor is Paddlewheel sensor. It can be used with water-like fluids. For
the type of applications where a straight pipe is not available for inlet, Positive displacement flow
meter is used. This type of water flow sensor can be used for viscous liquids also. For working with
dirty water and wastewater which may be conductive, Magnetic flow meter is used. For
applications such as sewage water, slurries, and other dirty liquids Ultrasonic flow meters are used.
The LCD display is used to display the measurements. The magnetic hall effect water flow sensor
outputs a pulse of every revolution of the rotor. The Hall Effect sensor present in the device is
sealed from water to keep it safe and dry.
B) Solenoid valves
Fig5.6Transformer
A transformer is an electrical device that transfers electrical energy between two or more
circuits through electromagnetic induction. Electromagnetic induction produces an electromotive
force within a conductor which is exposed to time varying magnetic fields. Transformers are used to
increase or decrease the alternating voltages in electric power applications. It is a step down
transformer in which the secondary winding is more than primary winding. Due to this windings it
can able to step down the voltage. A Transformer changes electricity from high to low voltage or
low to high voltage using two Properties Of Electricity
FEATURES
Output Vurren
Supply Voltage: 220-230VAC.
Output Voltage: 12VAC.
Soft Iron Core.
1 Amp Current Drain.
APPLICATIONS
DIY Projects Requiring In-Application High Current Drain.
On Chassis AC/AC Converter.
Designing a Battery Charger.
Electronic Applications.
Step Down Applications (Power transmission).
Specification
Input Voltage -230Volt.
Input Frequency -50Hz.
Output Voltage -12volt AC
Output Current Capacity-1 Amp RMS
Class of insulation-E Class.
Fittings –Screw Fitting.
5.4 HC05
Specification
Hardware features
Typical -80dBm sensitivity
Up to +4dBm RF transmit power
Low Power 1.8V Operation ,1.8 to 3.6V I/O
PIO control
UART interface with programmable baud rate With integrated antenna With edge connector
Fig5.7HC05
High quality made, CE passed, mini DC submersible water pump. It is built by brushless motor
which is quieter and last longer. Easy to maintain with fish tank, SOLAR WATER PUMP,
accelerating water circulation, miniature garden, indoor fountain, toys, and other water circulation.
Fig5.9 Pincord
Specifications
Size-1.5 sq mm
Lenght-1.5meter
Insulation classEclasPVC insulation
Pins -2pins
Current capacity-3.6Amp
5.7.4 Applications
1) Power supplies.
2) Voltage regulation.
3) Battery chargers.
Mounting Board
Diamensions- 40cm*40cm
Thickness -3mm
Material-PVC Coated wooden
5.10 PCB
Due to PVC Coating this board has very high electrical insulating properties.
Mechanical strength is also very high .
Zero PCB
• Value: 470uF • Rated Voltage: 25V • Type: Radial • Tolerance: 20% • Size: 12mm x 7mm •
Temperature: -40°C to +105°C • Weight: 1g
5.12 Softwares
Arduino lab IDE VERSION 1.8.8
Virtuino android interface
Proteus 8.1
5.13 Project Working Model
Increasing block tariffs (IBTs), widely used in the developing world, are claimed to produce
desirable income transfers, discourage wasteful use, promote economic efficiency, and assure
access to sufficient water for basic sanitation.
Tariffs raise the price of imports. This impacts consumers in the country applying the tariff
in the form of costlier imports. When trading partners retaliate with their own tariffs, it raises the
cost of doing business for exporting industries.
Some analyst believe that tariffs cause a decrease in product quality. Businesses look for
ways to cut production costs to account for tariffs.
Tariffs are more transparent and easier to administer than quotas. This makes it easier for
trading partners to negotiate them down or eliminate them.
[2] An, S.D. (2012) Interflow Dynamics and Three-dimensional Modeling of the Turbid Density Currents in
Imha Reservoir, South Korea, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
Colorado State University, 166p. ASCE (2013). 2013 Report card for America‘s infrastructure. Drinking
Water.
http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/a/documents/Drinking-Water.pdf.
[3] ASCE (2013). 2013 Report card for America‘s infrastructure. Drinking Water.
http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/a/documents/Drinking-Water.pdf. Last accessed August, 2014
[4] Automated Revenue Management Service (ARMS) Ltd. (2010). Frequently Asked Questions.
[5] Allen M, Preis A, Iobal M, Srirangarajan S, Lim HB, Girod L, Whittle AJ (2011) Real-time in- network
distribution system monitoring to improve operational efficiency. Am Water Works Assoc J 103(7):63
[6] Eng HL, Lee BH, Lim E, Anggrelly SY, Chew BF, Tai YC, Quek J, Haja N, Teo CP and Wong YT (2008) A
Fish Activity Monitoring System for Early Detection of Water Contamination. ASTAR Open Access
Repository. http://oar.a-star.edu.sg:80/jspui/handle/123456789/1283. Accessed 16 Feb 2016.
[7] Michael D. Dukes, Mary Shedd, and Bernard Cardenas-Lailhacar2‖SmartIrrigation Controllers: How Do Soil
Moisture Sensor(SMS) Irrigation Controllers Work‖
[8] A.N.Prasad, K. A. Mamun, F. R. Islam, H. Haqva ‖Smart Water Quality Monitoring System‖
[9] Prashant Salunke, Jui Kate ―Advanced Smart Sensor Interface in Internet of Things for Water Quality
Monitoring‖ Feb 24-26, 2017
[10] K.Lokesh Krishna, Omayo Silver, Wasswa Fahad Malende ―Internet of things application for
implementation of smart agriculture system‖ 2017