0% found this document useful (0 votes)
223 views4 pages

Mining and Earthmoving: Estimating Production Off-the-Job Example Problem (English) Example Problem (Metric)

This document provides an example problem for estimating production from a mining earthmoving project using metric units. It details the equipment, materials, job layout, and calculations to determine: payload, machine weight, usable pull, travel times between sections, and a comparison of tractive effort to total resistance on haul and return. The estimated production is not as accurate as from a computer program as it does not account for all acceleration/deceleration times.

Uploaded by

ali alilou
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
223 views4 pages

Mining and Earthmoving: Estimating Production Off-the-Job Example Problem (English) Example Problem (Metric)

This document provides an example problem for estimating production from a mining earthmoving project using metric units. It details the equipment, materials, job layout, and calculations to determine: payload, machine weight, usable pull, travel times between sections, and a comparison of tractive effort to total resistance on haul and return. The estimated production is not as accurate as from a computer program as it does not account for all acceleration/deceleration times.

Uploaded by

ali alilou
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Mining and Estimating Production Off-the-Job

Earthmoving ● Example Problem (English)


● Example Problem (Metric)

8. Check pusher-scraper combinations: 10. Estimate Compaction:


Pusher cycle time consists of load, boost, return and Compaction = S.F. × hourly fleet production
maneuver time. Where actual job data is not available, requirement = 0.85 × 1947 BCY/hr
the following may be used. = 1655 CCY/hr
Boost time = 0.10 minute Compaction capability (given the following):
Return time = 40% of load time Compacting width, 7.4 ft (W)
Maneuver time = 0.15 minute Average compacting speed, 6 mph (S)
Pusher cycle time = 140% of load time + 0.25 minute Compacted lift thickness, 7 in (L)
Pusher cycle time = 140% of 0.7 min + 0.25 minute No. of passes required, 3 (P)
= 0.98 + 0.25 = 1.23 minute 825G production =
Scraper cycle time divided by pusher cycle time indi- W × S × L × 16.3
cates the number of scrapers which can be handled by CCY/hr = (conversion constant)
each pusher. P
6.95 min 7.4 × 6 × 7 × 16.3
= 5.65 CCY/hr =
1.23 min 3
Each push tractor is capable of handling five plus CCY/hr = 1688 CCY/hr
scrapers. Therefore the two pushers can adequately Given the compaction requirement of 1655 CCY/hr,
serve the eleven scrapers. the 825G is an adequate compactor match-up for the
9. Estimate Production: rest of the fleet. However, any change to job layout
Cycles/hour = 60 min ÷ Total cycle time that would increase fleet production would upset this
= 60 min/hr ÷ 6.95 min/cycle balance.
= 8.6 cycles/hr
● ● ●
Estimated load = Heaped capacity × L.F.
= 31 LCY × 0.80
= 24.8 BCY Example problem (Metric)
Hourly unit = Est. load × cycles/hr
A contractor is planning to put the following spread on
production = 24.8 BCY × 8.6 cycles/hr
a dam job. What is the estimated production?
= 213 BCY/hr
Adjusted = Efficiency factor × hourly Equipment:
production production 11 — 631G Wheel Tractor-Scrapers
= 0.83 (50 min hour) × 213 BCY 2 — D9T Tractors with C-dozers
= 177 BCY/hr 2 — 12H Motor Graders
Hourly fleet = Unit production × No. of units 1 — 825G Tamping Foot Compactor
production = 177 BCY/hr × 11 Material:
= 1947 BCY/hr Description — Sandy clay; damp, natural bed
Bank Density — 1770 kg/BCM
Load Factor — 0.80
Shrinkage Factor — 0.85
Traction Factor — 0.50
Altitude — 2300 meters

28-10

PHB-Sec28-18.indd 10 6/21/18 4:14 PM


Estimating Production Off-the-Job Mining and
● Example Problem (Metric) Earthmoving

Job Layout — Haul and Return: 0% Grade


rade
4% G
0% Grade 0% Grade Sec. D — Fill 150 m
30 0 m
— Haul RR = 100 kg/t
. C
Sec /t Eff. Grade = 10%
Sec. A — Cut 150 m Sec. B — Haul 450 m 40 kg
RR = 100 kg/t RR = 40 kg/t RR = rade = 8%
Eff. G
Eff. Grade = 10% Eff. Grade = 4%

Total Effective Grade = RR (%) ± GR (%) Rolling Resistance —


Sec. A: Total Effective Grade = 10% + 0% = 10% RR = RR Factor (kg/mton) × GMW (metric tons)
Sec. B: Total Effective Grade = 4% + 0% = 4% Sec. A: = 100 kg/metric ton × 80.48 metric tons
Sec. C: Total Effective Grade = 4% + 4% = 8% = 8048 kg
Sec. D: Total Effective Grade = 10% + 0% = 10% Sec. B: = 40 kg/metric ton × 80.48 metric tons
= 3219 kg
1. Estimate Payload: Sec. C: = 40 kg/metric ton × 80.48 metric tons
Est. load (LCM) × L.F. × Bank Density = payload = 3219 kg
24 LCM × 0.80 × 1770 kg/BCM = 34 000 kg payload Sec. D: = 100 kg/metric ton × 80.48 metric tons
2. Machine Weight: = 8048 kg
Empty Wt. — 46 475 kg or 46.48 metric tons Total Resistance —
Wt. of Load — 34 000 kg or 34 metric tons TR = RR + GR
Total (GMW) — 80 475 kg or 80.48 metric tons Sec. A: = 8048 kg + 0 = 8048 kg
3. Calculate Usable Pull (traction limitation): Sec. B: = 3219 kg + 0 = 3219 kg
Loaded: (weight on driving wheels = 54%) (GMW) Sec. C: = 3219 kg + 3219 kg = 6438 kg
Traction Factor × Wt. on driving wheels = Sec. D: = 8048 kg + 0 = 8048 kg
28
0.50 × 80 475 kg × 54% = 21 728 kg Check usable kilogram force against maximum
Empty: (weight on driving wheels = 69%) (GMW) kilogram force required to move the 631G.
Traction Factor × Wt. on driving wheels = Force usable … 21 728 kg loaded
0.50 × 46 475 kg × 69% = 16 034 kg Force required … 8048 kg maximum total resistance
4. Derate for Altitude: Estimate travel time for haul from 631G (loaded)
Check power available at 2300 m from altitude dera- travel time curve; read travel time from distance and
tion table in the Tables Section. effective grade.
631G — 100% 12H — 83% Travel time (from curves):
D9T — 100% 825G — 100% Sec. A: 0.60 min
Sec. B: 1.00
Then adjust if necessary:
Sec. C: 1.20
Load Time — controlled by D9T, at 100% power, no
Sec. D: 0.60
change.
Travel, Maneuver and Spread time — 631G, no change. 3.40 min
5. Compare Total Resistance to Tractive Effort on haul: NOTE: This is an estimate only; it does not account for all
Grade Resistance — the acceleration and deceleration time, therefore
GR = 10 kg/metric ton × tons × adverse grade it is not as accurate as the information obtained
in percent from a computer program.
Sec. C: = 10 kg/metric ton × 80.48 metric tons × 4% 6. Compare Total Resistance to Tractive Effort on return:
grade = 3219 kg Grade Assistance —
GA = 10 kg/mton × metric tons × negative grade
in percent
Sec. C: = 10 kg/metric ton × 46.48 metric tons
× 4% grade = 1859 kg

28-11

PHB-Sec28-18.indd 11 6/21/18 4:14 PM


Mining and Estimating Production Off-the-Job
Earthmoving ● Example Problem (Metric)

Rolling Resistance — Each push tractor is capable of handling five plus


RR = RR Factor × Empty Wt. scrapers. Therefore the two pushers can adequately
Sec. D: = 100 kg/metric ton × 46.48 metric tons serve the eleven scrapers.
= 4648 kg 9. Estimate Production:
Sec. C: = 40 kg/metric ton × 46.48 metric tons Cycles/hour = 60 min ÷ Total cycle time
= 1859 kg = 60 min/hr ÷ 6.95 min/cycle
Sec. B: = 40 kg/metric ton × 46.48 metric tons
= 8.6 cycles/hr
= 1859 kg
Sec. A: = 100 kg/metric ton × 46.48 metric tons Estimated load = Heaped capacity × L.F.
= 4648 kg = 24 LCM × 0.80
= 19.2 BCM
Total Resistance — Hourly unit = Est. load × cycles/hr
TR = RR – GA production = 19.2 BCM × 8.6 cycles/hr
Sec. D: = 4648 kg – 0 = 4648 kg = 165 BCM
Sec. C: = 1859 kg – 1859 kg = 0 Adjusted = Efficiency factor × hourly
Sec. B: = 1859 kg – 0 = 1859 kg production production
Sec. A: = 4648 kg – 0 = 4648 kg = 0.83 (50 min hour) × 165 BCM
Check usable kilogram force against maximum force = 137 BCM/hour
required to move the 631G. Hourly fleet = Unit production × No. of units
Kilogram force usable … 16 034 kg empty production = 137 BCM/hr × 11 units
Kilogram force required … 4645 kg = 1507 BCM/hr
Estimate travel time for return from 631G empty 10. Estimate Compaction:
travel time curve. Compaction = S.F. × hourly fleet production
Travel time (from curves): requirement = 0.85 × 1507 BCM/hr
Sec. A: 0.40 min = 1280 CCM/hr
Sec. B: 0.55 Compaction capability (given the following):
Sec. C: 0.80 Compacting width, 2.26 m (W)
Sec. D: 0.40 Average compacting speed, 9.6 km/h (S)
2.15 min Compacted lift thickness, 18 cm (L)
7. Estimate Cycle Time: No. of passes required, 3 (P)
Total Travel Time (Haul plus Return) = 5.55 min 825G production =
Adjusted for altitude: 100% × 5.55 min = 5.55 min W × S × L × 10
Load Time 0.7 min CCY/hr = (conversion factor)
P
Maneuver and Spread Time 0.7 min
2.26 × 9.6 × 18 × 10
Total Cycle Time 6.95 min CCY/hr =
3
8. Check pusher-scraper combinations:
Pusher cycle time consists of load, boost, return and CCY/hr = 1302
maneuver time. Where actual job data is not available, Given the compaction requirement of 1280 CCM/h,
the following may be used. the 825G is an adequate compactor match-up for the
Boost time = 0.10 minute rest of the fleet. However, any change to job layout
Return time = 40% of load time that would increase fleet production would upset this
Maneuver time = 0.15 minute balance.
Pusher cycle time= 140% of load time + 0.25 minute ● ● ●
Pusher cycle time= 140% of 0.7 min + 0.25 minute
= 0.98 + 0.25 = 1.23 minute
Scraper cycle time divided by pusher cycle time
indicates the number of scrapers which can be handled
by each pusher.
6.95 min
= 5.65
1.23 min

28-12

PHB-Sec28-18.indd 12 6/21/18 4:14 PM


Estimating Production Off-the-Job Mining and
Systems Earthmoving
● Economic Haul Distances

SYSTEMS Haul System Selection: In selecting a hauling system


for a project, there may seem to be more than one
Caterpillar offers a variety of machines for different
“right” choice. Many systems may meet the distance,
applications and jobs. Many of these separate machines
ground conditions, grade, material type, and produc-
function together in mining and earthmoving systems.
tion rate requirements. After considering all of the
● Bulldozing with track-type tractors different factors, one hauling system usually provides
● Load-and-Carry with wheel loaders better performance. This makes it critical for the dealer
● Scrapers self-loading, elevator, auger, or push-pull and customer to work together to get accurate infor-
configurations, or push-loaded by track-type tractors mation for their operation or project. Caterpillar is com-
● Articulated trucks loaded by excavators, track load- mitted to providing the correct earthmoving system to
ers or wheel loaders match the customer’s specific needs.
● Off-highway trucks loaded by shovels, excavators or
● ● ●
wheel loaders

GENERAL LOADED HAUL DISTANCES FOR MOBILE SYSTEMS

Track-Type Tractor

Wheel Loader

Wheel Tractor-Scraper
28
Articulated Truck

Rear Dump Truck


10 m 100 m 1000 m 10 000 m
33 ft 328 ft 3280 ft 32,800 ft

LOADED HAUL DISTANCE

28-13

PHB-Sec28-18.indd 13 6/21/18 4:14 PM

You might also like