New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

ISSN: 0114-0671 (Print) 1175-8783 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzc20

Effectiveness of Aloe vera gel coating for

maintaining tomato fruit quality

A Chrysargyris, A Nikou & N Tzortzakis

To cite this article: A Chrysargyris, A Nikou & N Tzortzakis (2016) Effectiveness of Aloe�vera gel
coating for maintaining tomato fruit quality, New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science,
44:3, 203-217, DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2016.1181661

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2016.1181661

Published online: 27 Jun 2016.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 3420

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Citing articles: 21 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at

https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnzc20
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2016
VOL. 44, NO. 3, 203–217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2016.1181661

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Aloe vera gel coating for maintaining tomato

fruit quality
A Chrysargyris, A Nikou and N Tzortzakis
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology,
Limassol, Cyprus

ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY

Application of an edible coating is a technique that can be used to Received 10 November 2015
increase fruit storability. Tomato fruit were coated with 0%, 5%, 10%, Accepted 5 April 2016
15% and 20% Aloe vera gel and fruit quality maintenance was
KEYWORDS
examined up to 14 days at 11 °C and 90% relative humidity. Fruit storage; natural
Results showed that 10% and 15% A. vera coating reduced fruit products; preservation;
ethylene production. The ripening index (total soluble solids/ quality-related attributes;
titratable acidity) decreased after 7 days of storage in 10% Aloe- tomato; vegetables
coated fruits, maintaining the overall quality of the tomato fruit.
Lycopene and β-carotene content were reduced with 20% A. vera
in both examined storage periods. Ascorbic acid content was
increased in 10% Aloe-coated fruits. Total phenolics and
antioxidative status were increased in 20% coated fruits after 14
days of storage. Fruit firmness, titratable acidity, weight loss,
respiration rate and fruit colour (L*, a*, b*) did not differ among
treatments. Thus, an edible coating of 10% A. vera could be
considered as a promising treatment to maintain tomato quality
during postharvest storage.

Introduction
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) postharvest life as a climacteric fruit is relatively
short since many processes cause loss of quality and storability, including high respiration
rates, transpiration, postharvest diseases and acceleration in ripening process and senes-
cence (Zapata et al. 2008). Tomato quality changes continuously after harvesting. Fruit
quality aspects include firmness, flavour, colour and nutritional value, as well as shelf
life, processing attributes and resistance to pathogens (Ju et al. 2000). Tomatoes deterio-
rate rapidly after harvest and in some cases during or after transport and marketing.
Due to the economic impacts of spoiled foods and consumers’ concerns over the safety
of foods containing synthetic chemicals, a lot of attention has been paid to naturally derived
compounds or natural products (Stavropoulou et al. 2014). Edible coatings using natural
biomaterials are being explored as a safer alternative to extend the shelf life of perishable
food crops and improve food appearance (Mahfoudhi et al. 2015). Different compounds
have been used as edible coatings to prevent commodity weight loss, including wax,
milk proteins, celluloses, lipids, starch, zein and alginate (Cha & Chinnan 2004). Aloe

CONTACT N Tzortzakis [email protected]

© 2016 The Royal Society of New Zealand
204 A CHRYSARGYRIS ET AL.

vera gel has been identified as a novel coating agent with good antimicrobial properties
(Castillo et al. 2010; Navarro et al. 2011; Nejatzadeh-Barandozi 2013).
In recent years, the use of A. vera gel has gained much attention for use as a safe and
environment-friendly postharvest treatment. Aloe vera gel has been applied as edible
coating material for raw produce including nectarines (Ahmed et al. 2009; Navarro et al.
2011; Palanides et al. 2014), mangoes (Dang et al. 2008), apples (Ergun & Satici 2012),
strawberries (Singh et al. 2011), cherries (Martinez-Romero et al. 2006; Palanides et al.
2014), papayas (Marpudi et al. 2011), peaches and plums (Guillen et al. 2013; Palanides
et al. 2014), tomatoes (Athmaselvi et al. 2013; Chauhan et al. 2015) and table grapes
(Serrano et al. 2006). Typically, the A. vera concentration used in these studies ranged
between 50% and 100%, although it was much lower for apples (0%–10%). The results
of these studies have indicated that A. vera reduces the respiration rate, ethylene pro-
duction, weight loss, softening, total acidity and prevents colour development. Interest-
ingly, the antifungal activity of Aloe gel from several species has been correlated with the
content of aloin, one of the major phenolic compounds of Aloe leaves (Zapata et al. 2013).
For centuries, A. vera has been used for its medicinal and therapeutic qualities (Eshun
& He 2004). The two major liquid sources of A. vera are a yellow latex (exudate) and clear
gel (mucilage), both of which are produced from the large leaf parenchymatic cells (Ni
et al. 2004). Currently, there is increasing interest in the use of A. vera gel as a source
of functional ingredients in drinks, ice creams and beverages as well as being applied as
an edible coating (Martinez-Romero et al. 2006). Aloe vera contains malic acid-acetylated
carbohydrates (including β-1,4-glucomannans) which exhibit anti-inflammatory activity
and antibiotic actions (Eshun & He 2004).
The aim of this work was to study the effect of A. vera coatings on the change in phys-
icochemical parameters related to tomato fruit quality during storage.

Materials and methods

Plant material and experimental design
Tomato fruit (cv. Dafni) were obtained from local fields (crops cultivated for 6 months
under commercial conditions and standard cultural practices in a clay loam soil, fre-
quently irrigated according to crop needs during spring with a temperature range of
19–29 °C) in Limassol, Cyprus. Fruits were harvested at the third inflorescences of the
plants. In the laboratory, fruits were selected to obtain homogeneous batches based on
colour, size, ripeness (red-ripe stage) and absence of defect or injury.
Fresh A. vera gel was prepared according to previous reports (Navaro et al. 2011).
Briefly, for each leaf the spikes along the margins were removed before longitudinally
slicing to separate the rind from the inner leaf gel. The gel fillets were crushed to yield
a mucilaginous gel which was filtered to discard the fibrous fraction. The gel was
diluted with distilled water for the A. vera 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% (v/v) treatments.
Before the coating application, fruit were washed with a solution of sodium hypochlorite
(0.05%) for 5 min, rewashed with distilled water and air-dried at ambient temperature.
Twenty-four fruit were immersed in each concentration of A. vera gel coating solution
(5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) for 10 min. The coating solution was applied uniformly on the
whole fruit surface, while control fruit were dipped in purified water. After treatment, all
 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE 205

fruits were air-dried for 30 min at room temperature. After coating, pairs of fruit were
placed into 1 L polystyrene containers with snap-on lids, resulting in six containers (bio-
logical replications) per treatment for each of the two storage periods (7 and 14 days) at 11
°C and 90% relative humidity (RH) in darkness.
In summary, the experimental set-up consisted of five treatments × six replications
(two fruits per replication) × two storage periods (plus day 0) using a total of 132
fruits. Filter paper moistened with water was put in a small beaker, placed into each con-
tainer and remoistened every second day to maintain high RH during the storage period,
as described by Tzortzakis et al. (2007). Twelve samples of treated and control fruits were
taken after 7 and 14 days for immediate analysis. For day 0 measurements, fruits were used
after chlorine washing (six containers).

Decay evaluation
The severity of fruit decay (in individual fruits in each container; total 12 fruits per treat-
ment per storage period) was evaluated visually after 7 and 14 days of storage at 11 °C.
Tomato fruit showing surface mycelia development was considered to be decayed. The
degree of infection on fruit was rated using a scale of 1 to 5, where: 1 – clean, no infection;
2 – trace infection; 3 – slight infection; 4 – moderate infection; and 5 – severe infection.
Rots were distinguished by tomato tissue subculture on to potato dextrose agar media
as described previously (Tzortzakis et al. 2008).

Respiration rate and ethylene emission

The CO2 and ethylene production were measured by placing each tomato in a 1 L glass jar
hermetically sealed with a rubber stopper for 1 h at ambient room temperature. For res-
piration rate determination, the holder atmosphere was sucked out by a dual gas analyser
(International Control Analyser Ltd) for 30 s. Results were the means of two determi-
nations for each jar (six jars per treatment and storage period; n = 6) expressed as milli-
litres of CO2 per kilogram per hour. Ethylene was quantified by using an ethylene
analyser (ICA 56 Analyser, International Control Analyser Ltd); the container air
sample was sucked out for 30 s. Results were the means of two determinations for each
jar and expressed as microlitres of ethylene per kilogram per hour (six jars per treatment
and storage period; n = 6).

Weight loss, colour and fruit firmness

Weights of individual tomatoes were recorded on the day of harvesting (day 0) and after
the different sampling dates. Weight loss was calculated for each fruit (n = 6) per treatment
and storage time as follows: weight loss % = 100 (Wo – Wf) / Wo, where Wo is the initial
weight and Wf is the final weight of the fruit.
Colour was determined using the Hunter Lab System and a Minolta colorimeter model
CR400 (Konica Minolta). Following the recording of individual L*, a* and b* parameters,
results were the means of determinations made on four points for each fruit along the
equatorial axis. Twenty-four measurements for each treatment and storage time were
made.
206 A CHRYSARGYRIS ET AL.

Fruit firmness was measured at two points on the shoulder of each tomato fruit (1 cm2
of skin removed) for each treatment by applying a plunger 8 mm in diameter, using a tex-
turometer FT 011 (TR Scientific Instruments). The amount of force (measured in Newtons
[N]) required to break the radial pericarp (i.e. surface) of each tomato was recorded at
ambient (22–24 °C) temperature. Twelve measurements for each treatment and storage
time were made.

Soluble solids, titratable acidity, ascorbic acid and carotenoids

Total soluble solids concentration (TSS) was determined in triplicate from the juice
obtained from two pooled tomatoes for each replication (n = 6) with a temperature-
compensated digital refractometer (model Atago PR-101, Atago Co Ltd) at 20 °C,
and the results were expressed in Brix. The titratable acidity (TA) was measured by
potentiometric titration (Mettler Toledo DL22) of 5 mL supernatant diluted to 50 mL
with distilled water using 0.1 N NaOH up to pH 8.1. Results were expressed as a per-
centage of citric acid. Eighteen measurements for each treatment and storage time were
made.
Ascorbic acid (comprising the major part of vitamin C) in six independent pools of
tomato juice was determined by the 2,6-dichloroindophenol titrimetric method (AOAC
1995). An aliquot of 5 mL of pooled tomato juice was diluted with 5 mL of water and
titrated by the dye solution until the colour changed. Data were expressed as mg of
ascorbic acid per gram of fresh weight.
Carotenoids (lycopene and β-carotene) were determined according to the Nagata &
Yamashita (1992) method after modification. Six individual samples (two fruits pooled
in each sample) were examined per treatment and storage period. Thus, for each
sample, 1 g of blended tomatoes was placed in a 50 mL falcon and stored at −20 °C
until analysis (within 48 h). A volume of 16 mL of acetone:hexane 4:6 (v:v) was added
to each sample, the samples shaken vigorously and the two phases separated automatically.
An aliquot was taken from the upper solution for measurement of optical density at 663,
645, 505 and 453 nm in a spectrophotometer, using a reference acetone:hexane (4:6) ratio.
Lycopene and β-carotene contents were calculated according to the Nagata & Yamashita
(1992) equations:
Lycopene (mg 100 mL−1 of extract) = −0.0458∗A663 + 0.204∗A645 + 0.372∗A505
− 0.0806∗A453.

b − Carotene (mg 100 mL−1 of extract) = 0.216∗A663 − 1.22∗A645 − 0.304∗A505

+ 0.452∗A453.

Results were expressed as nmol per gram of fresh weight.

Polyphenol extraction and analysis

Preparation of extracts
Six individual samples (two fruits pooled in each sample) were examined per treatment
and storage period. Samples of 5 g were milled in a T25 digital ultra-turrax (IKA) with
 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE 207

10 mL methanol (50% v/v) for 30 s, and polyphenol extraction was assisted with ultra-
sound (Ultrasonic cleaning baths-150, Raypa) for 5 min. The slurry was centrifuged for
30 min at 5000 rpm at 4 °C (Sigma 3-18 K, Sigma Labs). The supernatant was transferred
to a 15 mL falcon tube and stored at 4 °C until analysis (within 48 h) for evaluation of total
phenolic content and total antioxidant activity.

Total phenolic content

The total phenolic content of the methanol extracts was determined by using Folin-Cio-
calteu reagent (Merck), according to the procedure described by Tzortzakis et al. (2007).
Briefly, 125 μL of plant extract was mixed with 125 μL of Folin reagent. The mixture was
shaken, before the addition of 1.25 mL of 7% Na2CO3, adjusted with distilled water to a
final volume of 3 mL and mixed thoroughly. After incubation in the dark for 90 min,
the absorbance at 755 nm was measured and compared with the prepared blank. Total
phenolic content was expressed as μmol of gallic acid equivalents per gram of fresh
weight (μmol GAE g−1 FW), through a calibration curve with gallic acid. All samples
were analysed in triplicate.

Determination of antioxidant capacity by ferric-reducing antioxidant power

(FRAP) assay
A 3 mL sample of freshly prepared FRAP solution (0.3 mol L−1 acetate buffer, pH 3.6)
containing 10 mmol L−1 TPTZ (tripyridil-s-triazine) and 40 mmol L−1 FeCl3·10H2O
and 20 μL extract (50 mg mL−1) was incubated at 37 °C for 4 min and the absorbance
was measured at 593 nm. The absorbance change was converted into a FRAP value, by
relating the change of absorbance at 593 nm of the test sample to that of the standard sol-
ution of trolox ([±]-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid). A stan-
dard curve was prepared using different concentrations of trolox, and the results were
expressed as mg trolox per gram of fresh weight (Pantelidis et al. 2007). All samples
were analysed in triplicate.

Determination of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging

activity
Radical scavenging activity was determined according to Wojdylo et al. (2007) with
some modifications. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of the plant extracts was
measured from the bleaching of the purple-coloured 0.3 mM solution of DPPH. One
millilitre of the DPPH solution in ethanol, 1.98 mL (50% v/v) methanol and 0.02 mL
plant extract were mixed. After shaking, the mixture was incubated at room temperature
in the dark for 30 min, and then the absorbance was measured at 517 nm. The results
were expressed in mg trolox per gram of fresh weight. All samples were analysed in
triplicate.

Statistical analysis
Data were first tested for normality and then subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Sources of variation were time of storage and treatments. Significant differences between
mean values were determined using Tukey’s HSD test (P = 0.05) following one-way
ANOVA. Significant differences on percentage values (weight loss) were logarithmic
208 A CHRYSARGYRIS ET AL.

transformed prior to using ANOVA. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (SPSS
Inc) and graphs were produced using Prism v.2.0 (Graph Pad Inc). All the assumption of
analyses were checked to ensure validity of statistical analysis.

Results and discussion

At the market interface, only produce that corresponds to the expectations of the consu-
mer is acceptable. Thus, it is vital to assess the effects of potentially innovative practices on
sensory and organoleptic properties of fruit and vegetables. Postharvest fruit quality attri-
butes are influenced by several traits such as weight loss, colour, firmness, total soluble
solids and total acidity and their changes during storage.

Decay percentage
There was no visible sign of decay in coated or control fruit until day 7 of the storage
period. Indeed, at the end of the experiment (day 14), only the control and the 5%
Aloe-treated fruit had signs (evaluated as 2.25 and 2.16, respectively, according to the
1–5 scale) of decay (mainly symptoms of anthracnose rot [caused by Colletotrichum coc-
codes] and secondary symptoms of black spot [caused by Alternaria alternata]) as pre-
sented in Table 1.

Respiration and ethylene production rates

The CO2 production rate in control and Aloe-treated tomatoes was significantly increased
during storage (Figure 1), while the A. vera coating did not affect the respiration rate
throughout storage period; it averaged at 1.817 mL CO2 kg−1 h−1 and 4.041 mL CO2
kg−1 h−1 at 7 and 14 days, respectively. Martinez-Romero et al. (2006) reported that
when cherries were coated with 33% A. vera gel, the CO2 production rate was increased
during cold storage and this increase was higher in the control than in the Aloe-treated
fruit. This contradictory observation might be the result of the higher percentage
A. vera gel used for the cherry coating compared with the present study. Paladines
et al. (2014) reported that the respiration rate decreased in Aloe-treated stone fruits (cher-
ries, nectarines and plums) but no significant differences were obtained between control
and Aloe-treated peaches, highlighting the variable observations related to species and/
or climatic and growth conditions.

Table 1. Effect of A. vera coating on tomato fruit decay during storage (11 oC, 90% RH).
Fruit decay
0d 7d 14 d
Control 1.00 ± 0.00* 1.16 ± 0.11a 2.25 ± 0.21A
5% A. vera 1.08 ± 0.08a 2.16 ± 0.20A
10% A. vera 1.00 ± 0.00a 1.08 ± 0.08B
15% A. vera 1.00 ± 0.00a 1.00 ± 0.00B
20% A. vera 1.00 ± 0.00a 1.00 ± 0.00B
The degree of infection on fruit was rated using a scale of 1 to 5 (1 – clean, no infection; 2 – trace infection; 3 – slight
infection; 4 – moderate infection; 5 – severe infection).
Values represent the mean of evaluation made on 12 independent fruit per treatment per storage period. Values followed
by the same letter in each column do not differ significantly (P < 0.05).
 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE 209

Figure 1. Respiration rate (A) and ethylene emission (B) during storage (11 °C, 90% RH) of control and
A. vera-coated tomatoes. Values are the means of six samples (n = 6) per treatment and storage period.
Values followed by the same letter in each column do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). * or ns indicate
significance or not, respectively, among controls through storage period.

The ethylene production rate was reduced in 10%, 15% and 20% Aloe-treated tomatoes
after 7 days of storage compared with the 5% Aloe-treated tomatoes, and was evident for
10% and 15% coated tomatoes only after day 14 (Figure 1). A steady increase in ethylene
emission was found in 20% Aloe-treated tomatoes after 14 days of storage; it is possible
that increased stress in the fruit speeded up the fruit ripening process. The increase in
ethylene production was delayed in Aloe-treated stone fruits (Navarro et al. 2011; Pala-
dines et al. 2014). Despite the unchanged respiration rates in Aloe-treated fruits, the
decrease in ethylene production has been attributed to the fact that A. vera gel acts as
an edible coating and initiates a decrease in gas permeability through the fruit surface.
This leads to modification of the internal atmosphere with enhanced CO2 and diminution
of O2 concentration, in accordance with results found with other coatings (Valero et al.
2013). However, a detailed study at molecular level is required to examine the impact
of A. vera gel on gene and/or protein expression involved in metabolic pathways, i.e.
the ethylene biosynthetic pathway, which is related to fruit ripening, especially for climac-
teric fruit such as the tomato.

Tomato quality parameters and bioactive compounds

In the present study, the Aloe-coating on tomatoes was ineffective, with no significant
effect on weight loss during 7 or 14 days’ storage compared with the control samples
210 A CHRYSARGYRIS ET AL.

(Figure 2). Opposite findings were reported in nectarines treated with 2.5% gel (Ahmed
et al. 2009), in cherries treated with 33% gel (Martinez-Romero et al. 2006), in table
grapes treated with 33% gel (Castillo et al. 2010) and in ‘Granny Smith’ (but not in
‘Red Smith’) apples treated up to 10% gel (Ergun & Satici 2012) as A. vera coating sup-
pressed the increase in weight loss.
With respect to firmness, tomatoes softened during cold storage for both treated and
control fruit (Figure 2). At the end of the cold storage, control fruit showed flesh firmness
levels of 15.44 ± 0.63 N, whereas in 15% Aloe-treated fruits, flesh firmness was 18.88 ± 0.94
N. Martinez-Romero et al. (2006) reported that a higher A. vera concentration (33% v/v)
significantly reduced the firmness losses (more than 50%) during cold storage in cherries.
Moreover, Aloe gel treatment (100%) suppressed the firmness loss in mangoes ripened at
21 °C for 19 days (Dang et al. 2008). This marked effect could be due to the higher Aloe gel
ratio and/or higher storage temperature employed for the mangoes compared with our
experiment. Interestingly, the double application of A. vera on table grapes was more effec-
tive in fruit firmness retention than a sole application (Castillo et al. 2010).
In general, Aloe coating had no profound effect on fruit colour. The lightness (L* value)
was decreased, while the redness (a* value) was increased during storage in both coated
and uncoated fruit (data not presented). The highest decrease in lightness was observed

Figure 2. Effect of A. vera coating on fruit weight loss (A) and firmness (B) of tomatoes during storage
(11 °C, 90% RH). Values are the means of six samples (n = 6) per treatment and storage period. Values
followed by the same letter in each column do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). * or ns indicate sig-
nificance or not, respectively, among controls through storage period.
 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE 211

in 20% coated fruit after 14 days of storage. No significant changes were found for the b*
values among treatments.
The TSS was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in 10% and 15% Aloe-coated fruits after 7
days of storage, but this effect was not evident after 14 days of storage (Table 2). The titra-
table acidity values of coated and uncoated fruits did not differ after 7 or 14 days of storage.
In fact, the ripening index (TSS/TA ratio) was decreased in 10% coated fruits (average
6.25) compared with control treatments and/or 5%, 15% and 20% coated fruits. This indi-
cates that the control fruit exhibited a more pronounced ripening development than the
10% Aloe-coated tomatoes. The titratable acidity of raspberries treated with A. vera gel
showed no significant difference compared with untreated fruits after 8 days of storage
(Hassanpour 2015), which is in agreement with the present findings for 7 and 14 days
of storage.
During fruit development the pigment content is changing, whereas during ripening
the chlorophyll content decreases and there is a prompt synthesis of carotenoids and
thus the red pigment lycopene as well as β-carotene are synthesised. Both lycopene and
β-carotene content decreased in Aloe-coated fruits greater than 10% of coating at 7
days and in 20% coated fruits at 14 days of storage, compared with the untreated fruit
(Figure 3). The decrease in carotenoids is possibly related to the reduced ethylene emission
rates and slows down the ripening process for the 10% and 15% Aloe-coated fruits.
Ascorbic acid content usually decreases as the ripening stage advances. Thus, an Aloe
coating significantly (P < 0.05) delayed the decline of ascorbic acid content in coated toma-
toes in comparison with control fruits, which can be considered a positive effect of edible
coatings. In detail, the ascorbic acid content of 10% Aloe-coated fruit was higher after 14
days of storage compared with the untreated fruits and the 20% Aloe-coated tomatoes,
while no significant differences were observed among 5% and 15% Aloe coatings
(Figure 3). Similarly, formulated Aloe coatings on tomato, including antioxidants and plas-
ticisers, have shown that ascorbic acid content increased during the breaker fruit stage, fol-
lowed by a slight fall during the light red stage, and then a slight increase during the red
stage (Athmaselvi et al. 2013). Hassanpour (2015) reported that A. vera coating was more
effective in the retention of TSS, TA and ascorbic acid levels because of the resultant lower
gas permeability which inhibited the respiratory rate and retarded the overall metabolic
activity of raspberry fruits during storage. However, respiration rates in the present
study were not affected, indicating a small effect of Aloe coating on fruit metabolism.
Vitamin C (ascorbic and L-dehydroascorbic acid) has high antioxidant activity, providing
protection against the presence of free radicals and consequently participating in the pre-
vention of many degenerative diseases, as well as being an essential nutrient for humans.
The content of total phenolics as well as the antioxidant activity, indicated by FRAP and
DPPH assays, are presented in Figure 4. On the day of harvesting, the total phenolic
content was 0.364 ± 0.024 μmol equiv. gallic acid per g fresh weight. Total phenolics
remained stable during storage for both coated and uncoated fruits with exception of
20% Aloe-coated fruits in which the content of phenolics increased two-fold, compared
with the control fruits and ≤15% Aloe-coated fruits. Similar observations were made of
the antioxidant status by FRAP assay at 14 days of storage. The increased content of phe-
nolics and antioxidant status in 20% Aloe-coated fruits may be attributed to the increased
ethylene emission rates after 14 days of storage. The evolution of total phenolics of fruits
 212
A CHRYSARGYRIS ET AL.
Table 2. Effect of A. vera coating on fruit total soluble solids (TSS, in oBrix), titratable acidity (TA, in % citric acid) and ripening index (TSS/TA ratio) during storage (11
o
C, 90% RH).
TSS TA TSS/TA
0d 7d 14 d 0d 7d 14 d 0d 7d 14 d
Control 3.91 ± 0.27 ns 3.60 ± 0.17a 3.51 ± 0.20A 0.55 ± 0.05ns 0.46 ± 0.05a 0.58 ± 0.05A 8.44 ± 1.35ns 8.35 ± 0.90a 6.94 ± 1.05A
5% A. vera 3.23 ± 0.21ab 3.30 ± 0.09A 0.44 ± 0.04a 0.37 ± 0.02A 7.75 ± 1.14a 8.97 ± 0.45A
10% A. vera 2.76 ± 0.15b 3.55 ± 0.22A 0.51 ± 0.07a 0.41 ± 0.03A 6.25 ± 0.63b 8.91 ± 0.85A
15% A. vera 2.87 ± 0.21b 3.38 ± 0.36A 0.37 ± 0.03a 0.49 ± 0.13A 7.99 ± 0.63a 9.63 ± 1.05A
20% A. vera 3.05 ± 0.15ab 3.12 ± 0.35A 0.41 ± 0.03a 0.38 ± 0.06A 7.67 ± 0.62a 8.65 ± 1.12A
Values represent the mean of measurements made on six independent samples (pooled of two fruits) per treatment and storage period. Values followed by the same letter in each column do not
differ significantly (P < 0.05). * or ns indicate significance or not, respectively, among controls through storage period.
 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE 213

Figure 3. Effect of A. vera coating on β-carotene (nmol g−1 f Fwt) (A), lycopene (nmol g−1 Fwt) (B) and
ascorbic acid (mg g-1 Fwt) (CSBOLDSTARTCCSBOLDEND) content in tomato fruit during storage (11 oC,
90% RH). Values are the means of six pooled samples (n = 6) per treatment and storage period. Values
followed by the same letter in each column do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). * Or ns indicate sig-
nificance or not, respectively, among controls through storage period.

during storage could be different; depending on the species, cultivar, temperature and cli-
mactic and environmental conditions during the growth period (Kalt 2005).
The effects of applying A. vera edible coatings on delaying the postharvest ripening
process and parameters related to fruit quality of tomatoes were similar to those previously
observed for sweet and sour cherry, table grape, strawberry, peach, plum, papaya and nec-
tarine coated with A. vera (Martinez-Romero et al. 2006; Serrano et al. 2006; Ahmed et al.
2009; Castillo et al. 2010; Marpudi et al. 2011; Navarro et al. 2011; Singh et al. 2011;
214 A CHRYSARGYRIS ET AL.

Figure 4. Effect of A. vera coating on total phenols content (GAE μmol g−1 Fwt) (CSBOLDSTARTACS-
BOLDEND) and antioxidant activity (mg trolox g-1 Fwt) (B, C) in tomato fruit during storage (11 °C,
90% RH). Values are the means of six pooled samples (n = 6) per treatment and storage period.
Values followed by the same letter in each column do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). *Or ns indicate
significance or not, respectively, among controls through storage period.

Guillen et al. 2013; Ravanfar et al. 2014). This effect in climacteric fruit was attributed to
the inhibition of ethylene production, as found in the present study.
Aloe vera gel has been used as an edible coating for many fruits and vegetables. Edible
coatings have various favourable effects on fruit such as imparting a glossy appearance and
better colour, retarding weight loss or prolonging storage/shelf life by preventing microbial
spoilage (Dang et al. 2008). Aloe leaves are rich in bioactive compounds some of which are
 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE 215

antioxidants and are used in food engineering as preservatives, such as mannans, antrachi-
non, c-glycoside, antron, antrakuinon and lectine (Eshun & He 2004). The gel of A. vera
and other Aloe spp. is mainly composed of polysaccharides and soluble sugars followed by
proteins, vitamins and minerals (Eshun & He 2004), but are very low in lipid content,
ranging from 0.07%–0.42% depending on the Aloe spp. and climatic conditions during
the growth cycle (Zapata et al. 2013). Thus, the gas barrier and hydrophobic properties
of Aloe-based edible coatings could be improved with the addition of lipids, since the
increase of lipid content in the composition of edible coatings leads to higher hydrophobic
properties and barrier efficacy (Morillon et al. 2002).

Conclusion
The results of this study indicate that tomato fruit coated with 10% or 15% A. vera gel
showed a significant delay in the change of ethylene emission during storage at 11 °C,
compared with uncoated control fruit. In addition, the ripening index was decreased
after 7 days of storage and the ascorbic acid content was increased in 10% coated fruits.
As a consequence, the overall quality of the tomato fruit was maintained during
storage. Further studies should be conducted on the coating properties. These studies
may be related to the improvement of hydrophobic properties of the A. vera coatings
and the gaseous exchange towards fruits. Thus new formulation and application develop-
ments to different climacteric and non-climacteric fruit and vegetables may be explored.
Additional investigation is needed to elucidate the underlying relationship between A. vera
gel treatment and antioxidant capacity in tomato fruits.

Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References
Ahmed MJ, Singh Z, Khan AS. 2009. Postharvest Aloe vera gel-coating modulates fruit ripening and
quality of ‘Arctic Snow’ nectarine kept in ambient and cold storage. Int J Food Sci Tech.
44:1024–1033.
AOAC. 1995. Official method 967.21 Ascorbic acid in vitamin preparations and juices. 16th ed.
Volume II. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Athmaselvi KA, Sumitha P, Revathy B. 2013. Development of Aloe vera based edible coating for
tomato. Int Agrophys. 27:369–375.
Castillo S, Navarro D, Zapata PJ, Guillen F, Valero D, Serrano M, Martinez-Romero D. 2010.
Antifungal efficacy of Aloe vera in vitro and its use as a preharvest treatment to maintain post-
harvest table grape quality. Postharvest Biol Tec. 57:183–188.
Cha DS, Chinnan M. 2004. Biopolymer-based antimicrobial packaging: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci.
44:223–237.
Chauhan OP, Nanjappa C, Ashok N, Ravi N, Roopa N, Raju PS. 2015. Shellac and Aloe vera gel
based surface coating for shelf life extension of tomatoes. J Food Sci Tech. 52:1200–1205.
Dang KTH, Singh Z, Swinny EE. 2008. Edible coatings influence fruit ripening, quality, and aroma
biosynthesis in mango fruit. J Agr Food Chem. 56:1361–1370.
Ergun M, Satici F. 2012. Use of Aloe vera gel as biopreservative for ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Red Chief’
apples. J Anim Plant Sci. 22:363–368.
216 A CHRYSARGYRIS ET AL.

Eshun K, He Q. 2004. Aloe vera: a valuable ingredient for the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic
industries: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci. 44:91–96.
Guillen F, Diaz-Mula HM, Zapata PJ, Valero D, Serrano M, Castillo S, Martinez-Romero D. 2013.
Aloe arborescens and Aloe vera gels as coatings in delaying postharvest ripening in peach and
plum fruit. Postharvest Biol Tec. 83:54–57.
Hassanpour H. 2015. Effect of Aloe vera gel coating on antioxidant capacity, antioxidant enzyme
activities and decay in raspberry fruit. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 60:495–501.
Ju Z, Duan Y, Ju Z. 2000. Plant oil emulsion modifies internal atmosphere, delays fruit ripening, and
inhibits internal browning in Chinese pears. Postharvest Biol Tec. 20:243–250.
Kalt W. 2005. Effects of production and processing factors on major fruit and vegetables antioxi-
dants. J Food Sci. 47:4639–4644.
Mahfoudhi N, Chouaibi M, Hamdi S. 2015. Effectiveness of almond gum trees exudate as a novel
edible coating for improving postharvest quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruits.
Food Sci Technol Int. 20:33–43.
Marpudi SL, Abirami LS, Pushkala R, Srividya N. 2011. Enhancement of storage life and quality
maintenance of papaya fruits using Aloe vera based antimicrobial coating. Indian J Biotechnol
10:83–89.
Martínez-Romero D, Alburquerque N, Valverde JM, Guillén F, Castillo S, Valero D, Serrano M.
2006. Postharvest sweet cherry quality and safety maintenance by Aloe vera treatment: a new
edible coating. Postharvest Biol Tec. 39:93–100.
Morillon V, Debeaufort F, Blond G, Capelle M, Voilley A. 2002. Factors affecting the moisture per-
meability of lipid-based edible films: a review. Criti Rev Food Sci. 42:67–89.
Nagata M, Yamashita I. 1992. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and
carotenoids in tomato fruit. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaish. 39:925–928.
Navarro D, Diaz-Mula HM, Guillen F, Zapata PJ, Castillo S, Serrano M, Valero D, Martinez-
Romero D. 2011. Reduction of nectarine decay caused by Rhizopus stolonifer, Botrytis cinerea
and Penicillium digitatum with Aloe vera gel alone or with the addition of thymol. Int J Food
Microbiol. 151:241–246.
Nejatzadeh-Barandozi F. 2013. Antibacterial activities and antioxidant capacity of Aloe vera. Org
Med Chem Lett. 3:1–8.
Ni Y, Turner D, Yates KM, Tizard I. 2004. Isolation and characterization of structural components
of Aloe vera L. leaf pulp. Int Immunopharmacol. 4:1745–1755.
Paladines D, Valero D, Valverde JM, Diaz-Mula H, Serrano M, Martinez-Romero D. 2014. The
addition of rosehip oil improves the beneficial effect of Aloe vera gel on delaying ripening and
maintaining postharvest quality of several stone fruit. Postharvest Biol Tec. 92:23–28.
Pantelidis GE, Vasilakakis M, Manganaris GA, Diamantidis G. 2007. Antioxidant capacity, phenol,
anthocyanin and ascorbic acid contents in raspberries, blackberries, red currants, gouseberries
and Cornelian cherries. Food Chem. 102:777–783.
Ravanfar R, Niakousari M, Maftoonazad N. 2014. Postharvest sour cherry quality and safety main-
tenance by exposure to Hot- water or treatment with fresh Aloe vera gel. J Food Sci Tech.
51:2872–2876.
Serrano M, Valverde JM, Guillen F, Castillo S, Martinez-Romero D, Valero D. 2006. Use of Aloe
vera gel coating preserves the functional properties of table grapes. J Agr Food Chem.
54:3882–3886.
Singh DB, Singh R, Kingsly ARP, Sharma RR. 2011. Effect of Aloe vera coatings on fruit quality and
storability of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Indian J Agr Sci. 81:407–412.
Stavropoulou A, Loulakakis K, Magan N, Tzortzakis N. 2014. Origanum dictamnus oil vapour sup-
press the development of grey mould in eggplant fruit and in vitro. Biomed Res Int. Article
562679. doi:10.1155/2014/562679.
Tzortzakis NG, Borland A, Singleton I, Barnes JD. 2007. Impact of atmospheric ozone-enrichment
on quality-related attributes of tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol Tec. 45:317–325.
Tzortzakis NG, Singleton I, Barnes JD. 2008. Impacts of low-level atmospheric ozone-enrichment
on black spot and anthracnose rot of tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol Tec. 47:1–9.
 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE 217

Valero D, Diaz-Mula M, Zapata PJ, Guillen F, Martinez-Romero D, Castillo S, Serrano M. 2013.

Effects of alginate edible coating on preserving fruit quality in four plum cultivars during post-
harvest storage. Postharvest Biol Tec. 77:1–6.
Wojdylo A, Oszmiański J, Czemerys R. 2007. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in 32
selected herbs. Food Chem. 105:940–949.
Zapata PJ, Guillen F, Martinez-Romero D, Castillo S, Valero D, Serrano M. 2008. Use of alginate or
zein as edible coatings to delay postharvest ripening process and to maintain tomato (Solanum
lycopersicon Mill) quality. J Sci Food Agr. 88:1287–1293.
Zapata PJ, Navarro D, Guillen F, Castillo S, Martinez-Romero D, Valero D, Serrano M. 2013.
Characterization of gels from different Aloe spp. as antifungal treatment: potential crops for
industrial application. Ind Crop Prod. 42:223–230.