Eco - 104 Final Assignment
Eco - 104 Final Assignment
Please follow the guidelines at the end very carefully. Total Marks: 55
Name: _ Sec:_15__________
Answer all following questions: Identify (by highlighting with yellow color) the correct
answer for following questions. (2 times 10 = 20 Marks)
Q1. In the Keynesian model of national income, In case of G multiplier if △G = 3.55 Million
BDT,
MPC = 0.75
a) 12 Million BDT
b) 10 Million BDT
d) 2 Million BDT
Q2. In the Keynesian model of national income, The smaller the value of MPC
a) The smaller the value of G multiplier c) The larger the value of G multiplier
decrease
Q3. In the Keynesian model of national income, the sign of ‘tax’ multiplier is negative because
Q4. In self-regulating economy if the current output is greater than natural level of output
Q5. In Keynesian model of national income If MPC value falls the planned expenditure line
Becomes
Answer: a) Flatter
a) Flatter
b) Steeper
Q7. In the model of money supply, if the money multiplier is constant, there is
Answer: Directly proportional relationship between money supply and monetary base
Answer: Research and development promote economic growth within economic system
Q10. If the base money is constant, greater the value of money multiplier
A) Derive the expression for government purchase multiplier in Keynesian model. If the
Answer:
In this graph, we have actual & planned expenditure on the vertical axis, and on the horizontal
axis, we have income. The original Keynesian cross was A. Here, OY1 is the initial equilibrium
level of income. When the government increased △G purchases, this will affect the original PE.
The economy gets a new Keynesian cross at point B. The economy will experience a new
equilibrium level of income or output at OY2. In the graph, △Y indicated the difference between
new equilibrium output and old equilibrium output, increasing income. Moreover, in this graph
△G also indicate the increase in government purchase.
Derivation of the expression for government purchase multiplier in Keynesian model
Suppose,
In here, △Y = Total change in income. Because △Y is the differences between new equilibrium
income and old equilibrium income. From the graph we can say that, OY2 – OY1 = △Y
We also know that MPC, lies between 0 and 1. so MPC is a positive function. If we substitute
any value of MPC that lies between 0 and 1; we will be able to calculate (△𝑌)/(△𝐺) is greater
than 1.
To verify the formula, we took 0.6 as the MPC value and found that, = (1/ 1- 0.6) = 2.5
(Which is ˃1).
Interpretation:
If the value of G multiplier = 2.55, that means If Government increases its purchase by 1 $,
equilibrium income rises by 2.55 dollars (MORE than 1 dollar). We can also say that, G=2.55
means when government expenditure increased by 1 unit, the equilibrium level of income
increased by2.55 units.
So we can conclude that, greater the value of MPC the larger the value of G multiplier.
B) Develop the following model of money supply: Money supply = Money multiplier ×
Monetary Base. If Base money = 5 million BDT and reserve requirement ratio = 10% and
We know that,
Developing the money supply model is essential to understand the differences between the
money supply and the monetary base. The money supply is defined as,
M = C + D……. I
Where,
M = Money Supply
C = Currency
The monetary base is produced or issued by the government and the capital bank, and it is held
in the hands of the public and the bank. Monetary Base is defined as,
B = C + R……………II
Where,
B = Monetary Base
After dividing I by II, we found that Currency (C) is common in both the equation; the difference
is due to the presence of D in the equation I and R in equation II. In here D is created by banks
but to create it, bank have to maintain on R. in here, we have
M C+ D
B
= C+ R
Then divide both the top and bottom of the expression on the right by D. We have
M = (𝑐𝑟+1) / (𝑐𝑟+𝑟𝑟) × B
= (1.15 / 0.25) × 5
recessionary gap. Discuss the Govt policy implication for each case.
Answer:
Inflationary Gap: In inflationary gap the unemployment rate is less than the natural
unemployment rate. In here we observe the shortage of labor market. That means the labor
demand will be high. Due to which the labor cost increase in this situation and in turn the final of
the product cost also higher.
In this graph, we have P (price) in the vertical line and Y in the horizontal line. Initial
equilibrium is pointed out at 1. which intercepts SRAS1 and AD. The current level of output is
OY1, and the current level of price was OP1. As a result of this, the current level of output
exceeds the natural level of output. Here the labor demand is high. The laborers try to increase
their nominal wages so that the final product also cost high—the SRAS2 shift toward left until it
touches the vertical LARS curve. So in the economy comes back at the natural level of output,
but the price increased at P2. That means. The final equilibrium is achieving at point 2. It is the
intersection of three lines: LRAS, SRAS2, and AD curve. In the inflationary gap, the
unemployment rate is less than the natural unemployment rate; we found that OY1 is greater
than OYN.
Recessionary gap: In here the unemployment rate is greater than the natural unemployment rate.
There will be surplus in the labor market so that many labors will look for job. So the labor cost
low is low in here so that SRAS curve shift towards the right side. The economy moves in to
long run equilibrium.
In this graph, we have P (price) in the vertical line and Y in the horizontal line. Here, 1 is
the initial short-run equilibrium that is the intersection of AD and SRAS1. Here, the current level
of output is OY2, and the price was P1. When the current output level is smaller, the
unemployment rate is higher than the natural level. That indicates that the labor demand is lower
here. That means there is a surplus in the labor market. So the labor will be less costly here due
to that SRAS1 curve shift toward the right side SRAS2. So the economy will be settled finally at
point 2, which is the intersection of AD, LRAS, and SRAS2 curves. The price level will go down
from P1 to P2. So in a Recessionary gap, the economy will be coming back towards the whole
employment level of output or the natural level of output.
At the right side graph, initially, the economy was at point 1. Here the government will
have to take contractionary monetary policy. The government will reduce the money supply. So
the economy ultimately comes back appoint 2 to from point 1. The price level goes down from
P1 to P2, and the output level comes back at the natural level. Here, the current level of out will
be greater than the natural level of output.
Government Policy implication for Recessionary gap:
When the government implements exponential monetary policy, the AD curve shift toward
the right side; when the government increases the money supply through the central bank, the
AD curve shift from AD1 to AD2, so the final equilibrium is achieving at point 3. Moreover,
some inflation also recognizes we can see the price level goes up from P1 to P2. So the point 3 is
the intersection of LRAS, SRAS & AD2. So economy very quickly comes back to the natural
level of output.
D) What are basic differences between neoclassical growth theory and New growth theory?
In order to distinguish between Neoclassical Growth Theory and New Growth Theory, we first
understand what these two indicate to us.
Neoclassical Growth Theory: Neoclassical growth theory emphasized two resources: labor and
capital. Here, technology was said to be exogenous; that means technological advancement
comes outside the economic system. This growth theory developed by “Robert Solow”
dominated the literature in the ’60s and ’70s. The basic equation of Neoclassical Growth theory:
𝑌/𝐿 = f (𝐾/𝐿) = f (k). The neoclassical growth approach failed to explain the cross–country
income differences. Because these Economies increased capital intensity in the same way, but
their growth outcomes were different.
New Growth Theory: During the early ’80s, a group of Economists (guided by Paul Romer)
proposed an alternative growth theory which was called New growth /Endogenous growth
theory. According to Roger A. Arnold Book, the New growth theory also proposed that
technological progress is determined within the economic system, and it is driven by Research
and development (R&D) activities. The more resources that go to develop technology, the more
and better technology is developed. For example, in the 1950s, Japan had few natural resources
and capital goods (and still does not have an abundance of natural resources), but it grew
economically. Some economists believe that Japan grew because it had access to ideas or
knowledge to improve.
Answer:
Suppose we consider two property rights structures. At the first structure, people are
allowed to keep the total monetary rewards of their labor. Whereas in the Second, people are
allowed to keep only half the monetary rewards of their labor. Maximum economists would
predict that the first property rights structure would stimulate more economic activity. Most of
the time, certain property rights permit landowners to go from their territory for business and
allow their property to work for them. Property rights formalization is, suitably, frequently
connected with monetary thriving. For example, the eighteenth-century German pioneers were
depicted above by the security of their individual and property. That security thus made it
workable for them to contribute and face challenges. All the more, by and large, the more
grounded the arrangement of property rights, the more grounded the motivation to work, save,
and contribute, and the more exciting the activity of the economy. That means the more viably
an economy works, the more development it will create for any arrangement of assets.
A country needs to have good governance to maintain its Economic growth because
today’s world believes that a sound governance system is a significant resource of economic
growth. Suppose a country has a good property right structure, then the entrepreneur will be
interested in investing and taking more risk to enjoy their full power of autonomy. On the other
hand, if a country has high taxation rules, it demotivated investors to invest. So it is suggested
that to maintain an organized legal system and flexible taxation rate with a minimal infatuation
rate to maintain a healthy economy.
From the above discussion, we can see how property rights structure promotes Economic
growth.