History Notes Liveson 2
History Notes Liveson 2
Describe the political, social and economic organisation of the Rozvi state.
Origins
Rozvi is a Shona word taken from the word kurozva meaning deprive.
This means taking something by force without intending to return it to the owner.
They are many stories on how the Rozvi State was established with the evidence based on oral
traditions.
The founder of the Rozvi state was a man called Dombo who was a cattle herder in the Mutapa State.
It is believed that Dombo was given cattle by the Mutapa King as a reward for his loyal services.
He broke away from the Mutapa State around 1680 and established his kingdom in the south west.
Some other sources state that Dombo defeated the Torwa people in their kingdom and built his own
kingdom.
Some Torwa people were driven away to other communities while others were absorbed to the new
kingdom of Rozvi.
The Rozvi state was firstly built at Danangombe and later the rulers moved to settle in Khami and
Naletale.
Some historians argue that Rozvi and the Torwa people are the same people.
Other historians suggest that Dombo was a local person who gained the power to become a leader of
the Rozvi State.
The Rozvi kings were given the title Changamire or Mambo.
The totem was a powerful spiritual bond between the rich and the poor.
It was usually the eldest son who took over the throne.
The king was believed to be a God and he could talk to the ancestors.
The king ruled with the help of a council which was known as the Dare.
The council gave the king advice and it was comprised of the priests, military leaders, and provincial
governors.
CHIEFDOM
SUB-CHIEF
REGION
VILLAGE
HEADMAN
FAMILY
HUTRozvi political structure
Kept property for the state such as cattle, prisoners and land.
He installed chiefs.
The army made use of assegai’s, wooden clubs, spears and shields.
They made use of guns that had been obtained from the Portuguese.
Young men would join the army and the army was used to collect tribute for the king.
The Rozvi army had a standing army.This army was used to extend the state by conquering and raiding.
Failure to pay tribute resulted in heavy punishment from the king.
This arrangement made sure there would be no disputes over the throne.
Social Structure
The Mambo lived in the huts specifically made for Rozvi rulers.
Mambos were the ruling class and they shared the same Moyo totem.
The non-Moyo were the people who accompanied the Changamire from the North-East.
The group consisted of the Kalanga speaking people who came from South west and the defeated Torwa
people.
The King’s role was to satisfy wishes of the group and to bring peace and unity.
A Tumbare was an army commander who organized the army and made sure that all sub chiefs paid
tribute to the King yearly.
He maintained law and order when the King died and when a new king had not been appointed.
Historians argue that Rozvi people used magic in order to win in battles.
The outstanding army was rewarded with cattle and the young men were encouraged to join the army
so that they will have cattle to pay lobola.
They also had faith in ancestors and spirit mediums who communicated with God and the dead.
At the King’s shrine, there were priests of Mwari or spirit mediums and were served by the King.
A ceremony was organized to appease the ancestors who were thought to have caused misfortune.
When natural disasters occurred it will be believed that people have committed the sin.
Wrong doers in the society were sentenced to death before the appeasement ritual was done.
The Kalanga and Torwa people who were absorbed by the Rozvi followed the religion of Mambo.
They were allowed to perform their own religious rites under the supervision of the King’s wives and the
Vanyai.
AGRICULTURE
HUNTING
TRIBUTE
TRADE
MINING
Agriculture
They used simple tools for farming such as the hoes and axes.
Axes were used to cut trees when clearing the land for farming and hoes were used for planting and
weeding.
They practiced shifting cultivation where the land was left for some years in order for it to gain its
fertility.
Royal family benefited from Zunde ramambo, this was a practice where subjects cleared the chief’s land,
cultivated it and harvested crops.
This food was used to feed visitors in the kingdom and to feed the army as well.
The chief was the custodian of the land and could allocate land.
Cattle were a sign of wealth, the more cattle one has, the wealthier he was considered to be.
They got more cattle from raiding other weaker ethnic groups.
Trade
They exchanged goods for services or other goods that were useful.
The Portuguese were not allowed to advance too far into the Interior of the Rozvi Empire.
African traders who acted as middlemen between the Rozvi and the Portuguese were called
Vashambadzi.
Rulers at Danangombe received many pieces of Chinese porcelain and bottles of Dutch alcohol in trade.
the Rozvi state was different from the Mutapa state in that trade did not create and support the ruling
class power.
Trade items
Tribute
The Rozvi people and many small states outside the Rozvi paid tribute to Changamire.
The king received tribute from the Chiefs in the form of cloth, beads, hoes, axes, gold, cattle, grain and
tobacco.
It was through tribute not trade that the Rozvi state got much of its gold.
Hunting teams went out for weeks and dried the meat as a form of preservation and later brought it
home.
The king was the custodian of animals and elephant tusks were surrendered to him.
A Pangolin was considered to be meat for the royal family and was surrendered to the king.
The fall of the Rozvi state was a result of conditions within the state and conditions outside the state.
The decline can also be attributed to the political system which only served to enrich the royal family at
the expense of ordinary people.
The Rozvi king had lost much power to other Rozvi chiefs especially the Tumbare.
People now moved away from the state in search of the better areas in the surrounding communities.
Summary
The Rozvi state is a Southern African society founded by the Changamire Dombo.
The fall of the Rozvi state was a result of the conditions within the state and conditions outside the
state.
THE NDEBELE STATE
Explain the political, economic and social organisation of the Ndebele state.
Origins
The Ndebele are the descendants of the Khumalo clan who lived under the leadership of Tshaka.
They got their name “NDEBELE” from the Sotho meaning “strangers from the coast”.
Mzilikazi managed to escape with a group of people who included warriors, men, women and children.
Mzilikazi’s group crossed the Drakensburg Mountains running away from Tshaka’s warriors.
Ekuphumuleni was close to Zululand, they faced regular attacks from the Zulu warriors and ethics groups
like the Pedi and Griqua.
On their way, Mzilikazi absorbed various groups such as the Sotho, Pondo, Swazi and Dhlodos who were
running away from Zulu attacks.
As they migrated they raided other people and forced them to join their group.
At Mhlahlandlela they faced attacks from Griqua and Rolong warriors.
The Griqua and Rolong almost destroyed the Ndebele people and captured much of their cattle.
The Boers became a threat to Mzilikazi since they allied with the Griqua, Tlokwa and Rolong warriors.
Dingane sent his warriors to attack the Ndebele but they were defeated, even though they had heavy
losses.
The reason why Dingane sent warriors was that he wanted to punish Mzilikazi.
Due to Dingane’s attacks, the Ndebele were forced to migrate further north into Botswana.
On their way, they separated into two groups Mzilikazi and Gundwane the Indunankulu.
Mzilikazi’s group moved further north while Gundwane’s group went directly to Zimbabwe and settled
at Gibixhegu.
Political Organisation
Chief judge
Army commander
Religious leader
Allocated land
Nation builder
The king did not rule in isolation, he ruled with the help from his Indunas, Umphakathi and Izikhulu.
The Ndebele State was recognized as highly unified due to its organization.
UMPHAKATHI
IZIKHULU
IZINDUNA
Role Of Umphakathi
Role Of Izikhulu
Izikhulu discussed all matters affecting the state and referred issues to the Umphakathi.
Role Of Izinduna
The Indunas also played an important role in the Ndebele state as the administrators.
They would also settle disputes, collect tribute and distribute it to the king.
Economic Activities
Raiding
Hunting
Trade
Pastoralism
Crop Cultivation
The Ndebele grew crops such as sorghum, maize, water melons, sweet potatoes, millet, groundnuts and
a variety of beans and peas.
Ndebele practiced shifting cultivation to make the land productive throughout the year.
The King owned fields at each major settlements and it was cultivated by people.
Pastoral Farming
The Ndebele people kept animals like cattle, sheep and goats.
Cattle played an important role in the state as there were regarded as the backbone of the Ndebele clan.
Cattle were highly valued as a bride wealth and were also kept for food consumption.
They used cattle in exchange for grains during drought times or foreign goods such as guns and gun
powder.
Hunting
From the animals they hunted, they got meat, skins and hides.
They hunted animals such elephants for ivory which was used in trade.
Trade
They exchanged items like hoes, spears, knives and grain and this form of trade was also called barter
trade.
The long distance trade was conducted with the Dutch, Portuguese and English traders along the East
African coast.
Trade started when Robert Moffat visited Mzilikazi and asked them to exchange ivory and beads from
the East coast.
Raiding
Raiding was an important activity in the Ndebele state.
They raided other communities for grain, cattle, women and men.
Social Organisation
The Ndebele people were classified according to where their ancestors came from.
The Ndebele society was characterised by different classes with different positions in the state.
ABEZANSI 15%
ABENHLA 25%
1. Abezansi
They were the original Khumalo people who came from the Nguniland.
This group divided itself according to clans in line with their totems.
The ruling class married only ruling class members and in this way, the group remained small.
2. Enhla/Abenhla
These people were captured by the Ndebele on their way from Zululand.
3. Amahole/Hole
The Hole were the Shona people who had lived in Mashonaland before the Ndebele had arrived.
This class comprised of the Shona people who had been absorbed into the Ndebele state.
They were the largest group in the Ndebele state making up to 60% of the population.
The men in this class were not allowed to marry women from the Zansi and Enhla clan.
The Kalanga, Rozvi and Shona that had been absorbed by the Ndebele worshiped the Supreme God
Mwari.
The Rozvi and the Ndebele believed the King was a rainmaker and also could make the soil fertile.
The political power was shown through the religious roles given to the king.
The Ndebele added their own customs to the people within their state.
The Ndebele practiced polygamy and they used cattle to pay lobola.
Cattle were a status symbol in the Ndebele state.
Loaned cattle were only used for milk, manure and also for farming.
The Ndebele practiced the inxwala ceremony which was presided by the king.
During the inxwala ceremony the king prayed for the prosperity of the state and for success in military
campaigns.
Tobacco
Leopard skin
Firewood
Grain
Animals
The decline of the Ndebele state may heve been caused by the disappearance of King Lobengula as well
as the European interference through the colonial system.
Summary
The political, social and economic systems of the Ndebele state were well organised.
Its decline may have been as a result of the European interference and the colonisation of Zimbabwe.
The Zulus were a small tribe that was under the Mthethwa people.
The state came about because of the struggles that were in Nguniland among the Nguni chiefdoms.
This system ensured that soldiers of a similar age were placed in one group.
Furthermore, the regiments were given their own name, colour and weapons.
The soldiers were to remain celibate until they had proved themselves to be ‘warriors.’
These tactics made sure that the Mthethwa conquered other tribes in Northern Nguniland.
Groups captured included the Qwabe, Msali, Mngadi and the Zulus.
These groups wanted to have control of grazing land as they survived on farming.
GROUP LEADER
MTHETHWA DINGISWAYO
NDWANDWE ZWIDE
NGWANE SOBHUZA
Tshaka joined the Mthethwa’s army at the age of sixteen and was a good soldier.
He was put in charge of a regiment by Dingiswayo when he was twenty- two years old.
In 1816, he became chief of the Zulu people when his father died with the help of Dingiswayo.
After Dingiswayo’s death Tshaka, destroyed the Ndwandwe and two of Zwide’s generals, Soshangane
and Zwangendaba fled north.
Introduction of the cow-horn formation, this was a method of warfare were enemies surrounded in
three different positions like that of cow-horns.
Tshaka’s enemies were completely destroyed with the use of this method.
The short stabbing spear known as the assegai was used in in warfare.
Soldiers were given long shields which protected the whole body.
In Tshaka’s army soldiers were not allowed to receive wounds in the back, they were to face the enemy.
The men were not to marry until they reached forty years of age.
Consolidation of power
Political reorganization.
Placing young females and males who were eighteen to thirty-five years old into regiments.
The regiments were housed in regimental towns and were placed around the state.
Each town was provided with its own cattle that had been looted from war.
Tshaka ensured that women and children became part of the Zulu state whilst the men were killed.
The inxwala ceremony or First Fruits Ceremony built a strong Zulu nation.
Economic Organization
The cattle were used for hides, meat and for carrying goods.
Cattle were also used in the payment of lobola and during traditional ceremonies.
The Zulu economy was based on payment of tribute from the people who had been conquered.
Crops such as millet, beans, pumpkins, melons, gourds, and other grains were cultivated.
Trade took place between the Zulu and the Boers as well as the Portuguese.
Minerals such as copper and iron were used to make tools and weapons.
Social Organization
The family homesteads formed compounds that were within a larger settlement.
The cattle kraal was constructed in the centre of the semi- circle huts.
The Zulu people would hold national festivals such as the Inkhatha and Inxwala ceremonies.
Political Organisation
There were councilors whom he consulted, but the final decision was his.
He was the only one who conducted the first fruits ceremony.
He nominated all the provincial chiefs as well as the territorial chiefs.
He was the one who passed the final decisions given that he was the head of the judiciary system.
Tshaka made use of female relatives as spies; they were the eyes and ears of the king.
This relative would keep Tshaka well informed about the activities of the indunas and his regiments.
Judiciary leader
Military commander
Spiritual leader
Performing Rituals
There was the use of national symbols such as inkhatha (woven grass coil in the hair).
SUMMARY
The Zulus were the small tribe of the Mthethwa people.
The Zulu state was formed by Tshaka after the death of Dingiswayo.
Tshaka improved Dingiswayo’s military reforms such as the cow horn formation.
Definition
Slave trade-this was a system of buying and selling people from Africa to Europe and America.
West African Trade was also known as the Triangular Slave Trade or Trans-Atlantic trade.
1. Sources of slave trade in West Africa.jpg (145 KB)Sources of slaves in West Africa
2. Investors in the Slave Trade.jpg (169 KB)Sources of slaves in West Africa
Europeans established plantations for raw materials such as sugarcane, coffee and palm oil.
Discovery of new land such as the West Indies which needed human power.
This was different from the Indian, Chinese and Europeans that had been used before.
Europeans had the means of transport and advanced technology such as ships and guns.
Senegambia region
Upper-guinea coast
Sierra Leone
Slave-Coast
1) Europe
At this point, raw materials such as sugar, cotton, coffee and tobacco were sold.
In turn, the merchants got money which they used to buy the following goods:
Guns
Clothing
Alcohol
Mirrors
Beads
Ammunition
At times Europeans themselves went into the interior and raided the Africans.
The Europeans used neck chains or wooden shackles tied together to lead the slaves.
The Europeans used middlemen or slave traders to bring the slaves to the coast.
The Slave Trade was carried out by kings who were in coastal areas.
Those held positions of power in West African states were able to sell slaves.
6. Groups of Africans that were sold into slavery.jpg (145 KB)Groups of Africans that were sold into
slavery (arrows)
The slave trade increased the number of criminals who were sold into slavery.
Most often they were beaten so that that they would walk faster.
The slave traders kept the captured people in warehouses or slave pens.
Captured Africans were inspected and branded with hot irons and instruments.
Physical defects
Mental defects
No obvious illness
Teeth
The captured people would then be branded with the initials of their buyer.
Women and children were not chained but were allowed to move freely.
The journey could take three to five weeks and even longer if the weather was bad.
Diseases, such as malaria, scurvy (lack of vitamin C) dysentery and smallpox were common on the slave
ships.
The conditions were therefore not healthy as the slaves were crowded.
These revolts were put down violently and it resulted in deaths of many people.
At times slaves would commit suicide by throwing themselves into the ocean.
9. Picture showing how slaves were packed.jpg (191 KB)Picture showing how slaves were packed
Slaves were packed in such a way that they would not move.
They were especially- made ships that allowed for slaves to be packed like sardines.
These ships had shelves that were constructed one on top of the other.
The compartments were on the lower deck and usually were in darkness all the time.
The slaves were expected to lie in this position for the whole journey.
For example, 20% and 30% of slaves died on their way to America.
Despite the deaths, the slave traders made huge profits from the sales of those who had survived.
Slaves in America
11. Aposter showing the sale of slaves.jpg (248 KB)A poster showing the sale of slaves
Ill-Treatment Of Slaves
They would also be branded by their owner so they would not run away.
Branding involved marking slaves with a hot iron as if they were livestock.
Slaves were often beaten and whipped in cases that did not require such punishment.
Europeans began to view Africans as lower people, uncivilized and naturally born to be slaves.
13Slaves being led into the lower deck of a slave -ship.jpg (195 KB)Instruments used to chain slaves
14. Instruments used to chain slaves.jpg (323 KB)Instruments used to chain slaves
This is when a few individuals made a profit at the expense of the rest of the people.
The plantation owners viewed slaves as their property they had bought.
Reasons For The Abolition Of The Slave Trade And Steps Taken
Many people were against the slave trade right from the start they saw how wrong it was.
By 1830 Britain was getting wealth from industries instead of the slave trade.
Europeans were getting a new type of goods such as palm oil from Africa.
At the same time, there was a need for raw materials such as groundnuts, cocoa, coffee, cotton rubber,
gold, ivory and food crops.
The slave trade caused wars and much disruption of production of African economies.
Most European countries had begun to industrialize therefore they did not need the slave trade.
Europeans who were opposed to slavery formed anti-slavery groups in America and Europe.
These groups would assist slaves and they also campaigned against slavery.
They were known as abolitionist movements.
There was depopulation in Africa as the strong and able people were taken away.
The goods brought to Africa were for the ruling class and the slave traders.
Families and at times communities were destroyed because of the slave trade.
The Slave Trade resulted in the loss of African culture, as slaves were given new names and not allowed
to speak their own language.
There was disunity among Africans and made it easier for colonization.
SUMMARY
Slave trade was the selling and buying of human beings in Africa and other continents.
The slaves were ill-treated in various ways and the ruling class always engaged in wars so as to provide
slaves.
Name the countries that took part in the scramble and partition of Africa.
Describe the effects of the Scramble and Partition of Africa on Europeans and Africans.
Debate on the contribution of the Scramble and Partition of Africa on the development of African
societies.
Introduction
The Scramble and Partition was the occupation, division and colonisation of African countries by the
European powers.
Between 1870 and 1914 European countries took control of approximately 90% of African territories.
These European powers aimed at gaining access to natural resources, maintaining trade routes as well
as preventing other European rivals from taking over those territories.
The declaration ownership of many colonies in Africa fuelled the idea of scrambling and fighting for
resources.
Fig. 1.1.1Fig. 1.1.1 Some European representatives scrambling for colonials..png (186 KB)Some European
representatives scrambling for colonials.
Key terms
Colonisation is a process whereby a stronger country or an imperialist establishes political control over a
weaker country and send representatives to live there in order to obtain resources from it.
Imperialism is a policy whereby a powerful country extends its power by colonising a weaker country
through signing of treaties or use of military force.
Scramble means a rush for something in a disorderly manner.
Therefore, Scramble for Africa is a term used to refer to a sudden rush by European powers to Africa for
the intension of acquiring colonies.
Therefore, Partition of Africa refers to the process of dividing the African continent amongst the
imperialist powers and it was a response towards the sudden rush.
Scramble and Partition of Africa was the process of invading, dividing and sharing of African territories
amongst the European countries.
Fig. 1.1.2Fig 1.1.2 African countries that were colonised by European powers..png (70 KB)African
countries that were colonised by European powers.
Britain
Britain obtained the highest number of territories in Africa with the help of missionaries, explores and
hunters through concessions and military confrontation.
Belgium
Belgium took a part of Congo to which Leopold II enslaved Africans to exploit rubber and ivory.
France
France aimed at occupying from West Africa to the Red Sea but then her plans were disturbed by
Britain’s occupation of Egypt and Sudan.
France’s bigger part was the Sahara Desert but then it was not much of use to her.
She also seized territories like Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Mali, Guinea, Mauritania, Dahomey, Ivory
Coast, Senegal, Gabon, Chad, a part of Congo, a part of Somalia and Eritrea.
Portugal
Portugal had already established a relationship with Africa from long back through trading with the pre-
colonial societies.
She could have claimed more territories but she lacked power to do so and so she obtained Angola,
Mozambique and a part of Guinea.
Italy
Italy, due to her unification, she joined colonialism later and only obtained Libya and a part of Somalia.
Germany
Germany had also become a new unified state but then it appeared to be the precipitator of the
Scramble as it called for the Berlin Conference.
She therefore obtained Togo, Tanganyika, Namibia, Rwanda, Burundi and Cameroon.
Spain
Spain only reflected her status in Europe through obtaining a part of Guinea and Morocco.
Holland
Holland which comprised of the Dutch had long history in the Southern Africa and they were known as
the Boers of the Transvaal Region, however their area was then absorbed by Britain.
Only two African countries remained independent by 1914 that is Liberia and Ethiopia.
The Scramble and Partition for Africa was fuelled by political, social and economic factors that affected
most European countries.
Political factors
European countries were in a competition for supremacy and the acquisition of colonies were a prestige
and sign of power.
This desire for popularity and glory was fuelled by Britain who was strong because of her colonies in
Asia.
Each country wanted to be valued as superior through colonising many African territories.
Strategic Reasons
Africa was scrambled and portioned for strategic purposes so that the Europeans could control trade in
times of peace and war. African coast countries like Egypt, Mozambique, Angola and the Cape were
obtained so as to control trade routes.
A good example is that of Egypt in which Britain was interested for the Suez Canal which was a swift
route to India.
Balance Of Power
European countries also colonised Africa for the balance of power which referred to a state whereby
some European countries were regarded to be roughly equally military, politically and politically.
These countries realised that in their own continent it was impossible to expand without war hence they
opted for Africa where there was little or no resistance.
Militarism
Africa became the base and source of troops for European countries.
African countries like Senegal obtained by France, South Africa and Zimbabwe obtained by Britain
became bases and source of troops as their people were used to fight in the First World War.
Social factors
Europeans viewed Africa as a dark continent characterised by cannibalism and barbarism therefore they
wanted to bring light and civilisation.
This was due to the fact that European countries were already technologically advanced and they felt
superior to Africans.
They felt the need to spread the 3Cs that is Christianity, Civilisation and Commerce therefore Africans
were dragged from their own beliefs, culture and way of life.
Some European countries scrambled for Africa to end slavery and slave trade.
Slavery and slave trade was popular in Africa, therefore Europeans wanted to civilise and end all ill-
treatment through the introduction of Christianity.
As a result of overpopulation Europeans also needed extra living space and to search for employment
opportunities.
The introduction of machines and wars in Europe resulted to people losing their jobs and some thought
of starting a new life in Africa.
Food and space was not enough for populations which would have caused revolts against those in
power, therefore to avoid this, they had to find space in Africa to cater for the people.
Economic factors
The Scramble for Africa was also due to the need for raw materials for production in the European
industries.
The period of industrial revolution in Europe which lasted up to the first half of the 19th century
demanded much of raw materials like gold, oil, cotton and rubber which only could be found in Africa.
Therefore it led to competition for territories in Africa for example the gold which was found in South
Africa and the suspicion of the second rand gold in Zimbabwe.
Africa was seen as land without people and therefore the Europeans found themselves land for
agricultural purposes.
European economic land was not available for further investment thus these countries focused on the
areas that could bring huge profit due to the availability of land as well as cheap labour.
Europeans were also seeking markets in Africa. This was due to British’s high tariffs on imported goods
making it difficult to sell goods to other industrialised countries and its poorly waged people.
When European industries downturned from 1875 to 1900, investment of capital became unprofitable.
This pushed European capitalists to invest in Africa which brought lots of profits, for example gold and
diamond mines in South Africa doubled even more than those of Europe.
The rise or emergence of working class resistance caused a problem of cheap labour as many working
class movements and trade unions demanded better wages and good working conditions.
Their demands could not be easily met by the capitalist who only focused on [profit making.
The only alternative to solve the problem for cheap labour was to seek colonies in Africa.
Local factors
Some African chiefs invited Europeans who brought materials like clothes, jewellery, food and other
things for them. These chiefs thought of themselves other than their own people’s interests.
European Agents
Some African men had become European agents and worked for their companies making it easy for
European penetration into Africa.
Most of these agents were the Mulattoes (those of mixed white and black ancestry).
Slave Trade
Africa was also weakened by slave trade which left them under populated and lacking men power.
Soil Fertility
Furthermore, Africa’s soil was fertile and rich in minerals. Some places were good for recreation for
example the Victoria Falls and Great Zimbabwe ruins in Zimbabwe.
Traders, missionaries, hunters, and explorers invited their countries over to Africa and encouraged
colonialism so they could accomplish their missions.
Missionaries like John Smith Moffat and hunters like Frederick Courtney Selous played a great role in the
occupation of Zimbabwe.
Moreover, European imperialist Cecil John Rhodes who had already established a business in South
Africa influenced the involvement of Britain in taking control of more territories in Africa.
Cecil John Rhodes’s dream was to paint ‘Africa red’ from Cape to Cairo.
The main aim of the conference was to create rules on how to peacefully divide Africa among the
Europeans.
The conference was spearheaded by the German Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck.
COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVE
Germany Ottoman Von Bismarck, Paul Von Hatzfeldt, Clemens Busch, Heinrich Von Kusserow
Belgium King Leopold II, Gabriel August Van Der Straten-Ponthoz, Auguste Lambermont
Spain Francisco Merry Y Colom
Note that: The United States of America and Denmark attended as spectators of the conference.
Every leader of these European countries had maps of Africa in front of them as they divided and shared
Africa among themselves.
Africans were not invited to this conference as Europeans powers were to discuss on how to establish
effective control over African territories peacefully.
Fig. 1.1.3Fig. 1.1.3 Imperialists at the Berlin Conference discussing on how they were to share Africa..png
(306 KB)Imperialists at the Berlin Conference discussing on how they were to share Africa.
They agreed that any European power interested in any sphere of influence must effectively establish
control over the colony so that others will be aware of it.
If one had occupied their colony, there was need for notification.
They also agreed to plan effectively when they had a target that is if they failed to colonise, it meant that
any other country had the right to go after the targeted territory.
The intending power had to produce evidence of occupation that is in form of treaties or concessions
that they would have signed with African rulers.
They agreed to end slave trade in which ever territory that they occupied.
Congo region was also recognised to be under the control of Leopold II the king of Belgium.
There was to be freedom of navigation in the major water ways that is Congo, Niger and Zambezi. All
European countries were to use them for trade.
Under the leadership of Otto Von Bismarck the conference managed to divide African territories among
the European powers peacefully.
These imperialists power established their full control over their territories of interest leading to
effective occupation of Africa.
Fig. 1.1.4Fig. 1.1.4 A portrait of Bismarck spearheading the sharing of Africa amongst the Europeans..png
(201 KB)A portrait of Bismarck spearheading the sharing of Africa amongst the Europeans.
It authorised the occupation of African territories by Europeans and by 1914 only 2 countries in Africa
had remained independent.
The colonial powers abolished slave trade in their colonies and legitimate trade was introduced which
also led to the exploitation of African resources.
The colonial powers also agreed to protect the missionaries who actually helped in the colonisation
process.
Fig. 1.1.5Fig. 1.1.4 Colonial Africa in 1914..png (188 KB)Colonial Africa in 1914
To the Africans
Africans lost their political, economic and social freedom; power and independence to Europeans.
As it paved way of colonial rule in the continent, Africa became a source of raw materials needed by
European capitalists.
Therefore Africa was left under developed as resources were sent back to Europe profiting them not
Africans.
Africans lost their mainstay that is land and were forced to produce labour in farms.
They were also driven to infertile and arid areas which led to starvation of people and their livestock.
Africans also lost most of their livestock especially cattle to the European imperialists.
African dignity and status was also lost through creation of boundaries by imperialists which divided
most of the ethnic groups in Africa.
The introduction of Western culture that is Christianity downgraded and destroyed Africans’ culture and
tradition in most areas.
However, European colonisation brought some technological changes for example bigger ships were
made for trade and industries were opened with machinery.
African population shifted as most of them migrated from rural to urban areas due to construction of
industries and markets. Some were actually forced to move to reserves.
Schools and social services like hospitals and clinics were established.
Africans got educated and gained skills in carpentry, metal work, building, sewing and other handwork
that was introduced.
To Europeans
There was a major economic growth in Europe as they fished African resources and raw materials for
their own use.
Their industries and agriculture rose because of the supply of cheap labour and market.
Europeans also gained extra space for living and establishment of their businesses at the expense of
Africans livelihoods.
They also gained status and prestige through possession of colonies in Africa.
Europeans gained unity, confidence and diplomacy which made them superior over Africans hence they
treated Africans as sub humans.
Summary
The Scramble and partition was a process of invasion, occupation, colonisation and annexation of
African territories by European powers.
The Scramble for African territories was mainly caused by political, social and economic interests of the
European countries.
In 1818 the Berlin Conference meeting was held in Germany to solve conflicts and avoid fighting over
African territories.
Activities
Assume you were Bismarck, write a convincing speech on how Europeans countries should mark
territories.