Registration No.

0107537000939
ITALIAN-THAI DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
North-South Commuter Railway Extension (NSCR-EX) Project

Ref. No.: NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-RPT-ST-000088 August 19, 2021

Attention: Mr. Katsuyuki Saito

Project Director
GCR Consortium
21st Floor, Greenfield Tower
Mayflower Street, Greenfield District
1500 Mandaluyong City

Subject: Soil Investigation Report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

Dear Sir,

Pursuant to Technical Specification TS 204.7.4 “Geotechnical Investigation”, we hereby

submit to you the Soil Investigation Report for BH-Pile Test (P-877) for your review and
issuance the ‘Notice of No Objection’ for the Contractor to proceed further as planned.

Your attention and earliest response would be highly appreciated.

Yours faithfully,
For and on behalf of
Italian-Thai Development Public Company Limited

Vethin Wasuntarasook
The Contractor’s Representative/Project Manager

Encl.: Soil Investigation Report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

(Ref No.: NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-RPT-ST-000088) (76 Pages)

2034/132-161 ITALTHAI TOWER, NEW PETCHBURI ROAD, BANGKAPI, HUAYKWANG, BANGKOK 10320, THAILAND
P.O. BOX 1011 NEW PETCHBURI, TEL: (66 2) 716-1600, FAX: (66 2) 716-1488, www.itd.co.th
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works

ITALIAN-THAI DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

North-South Commuter Railway Extension (NSCR-EX) Project

PACKAGES No. CP N-03
CIVIL WORKS

ITD DOCUMENT NO.: NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-RPT-ST-000088

REVISION: 0
TITLE: SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT – BH-PILE TEST (P-877)

AUTHORISATION
Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

…………………………………. ………………………………….
(Mr. Chakkrapong Intoh) (Mr. Roberto Caballero)
Civil Construction Manager QC Manager

19-August-2021
Date: …………………………… 19-August-2021
Date: …………………………… ………………………………….
(Mr. Vethin Wasuntarasook)
Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Project Manager

19-August-2021
Date: ……………………………

…………………………………. ………………………………….
(Mr. Sedthasit Udomphant) (Mr. Jira Pornpermpoon)
Technical Manager QA Manager

19-August-2021
Date: …………………………… 19-August-2021
Date: ……………………………
This is a controlled document which shall not be copied without the permission of the Document Controller.
Note: A CONTROLLED copy is valid only if stamped “C” in blue,
Uncontrolled copies shall NOT be updated or amended.
Please refer to a controlled copy or check for amendments before use.
AMENDMENT/RELEASE RECORD
Revision Issue Description of Amendment/Release Effective Date
No. Type

0 C First For Client Consent & Approval 19 August 2021

Type of
"A" For Acknowledgement & Information & Reference "R" For Internal Review & Comment
Issuing:
"C" For Employer's Representative's approval "U" For Internal Using and/or replacing the existing one.

Document No. Revision Page No.

NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-RPT-ST-000088 No. 0 Date: August 19, 2021 1
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works
Soil investigation report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE ............................................................................................ 3

2.0 SPECIFICATIONS AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ................... 3

3.0 CONTRACTOR’S QA/QC EVALUATION ....................................... 3

4.0 APPENDIXES ..................................................................................... 4

Document No. Revision Page No.

NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-ZWD-ST-000088 No. 0 Date: August 19, 2021 2
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works
Soil investigation report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

1.0 Purpose
TS 204.2.7.1 state that Geotechnical Investigation be performed to determine the
suitability or otherwise of the soil or rock to support the foundations of the bridge or
other structure and also to determine soil parameters and rock characteristics required
for the design of foundations by in situ testing or testing of samples/cores taken from
bores/drill holes.
In TS 204.2.7.4 the Geotechnical Investigation Report shall be prepared by the
Contractor and submitted to the Engineer for approval.
The purpose is for the Engineer to be able to decide if the design bored pile length is
adequate or needs re-evalauation.

2.0 Specifications and Reference Documents

TS 204.2.7.1 : Geotechnical Investigation
MST Doc Reference no NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-MST-ST-000033 rev 05
WIR no. NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-WIR-QA-001178, 001195 and 001200

3.0 Contractor’s QA/QC Evaluation

Soil investigation for Borehole BH-Pile Test (P-877) was started 31 July 2021 and
was completed 04 August 2021. A site inspection report was attached to the close out
of the WIR’s.
The table below shows the requirements of the work secifications and related
activities performed by the Contractor.
Spec Section Requirements Inspection / Test Results
TS 204.2.7.4  Geotechnical investigation to be  This report and Appendix 1.
Data Required submitted to the Engineer (GCR) for
approval.
 Data required
 Soil Classification  1st to 3rd bullet point are tested and
 Particle size distribution shown on the report.
 Moisture content
 Density and void ratio  3rd to 5th bullet points are tests than can
 Compressibility be performed on undisturbed samples,
 Permeability which is not collected as all N-values
are more than 5.
 Chemical analysis of soil  Chemical analysis of water is attached
and water for aggressive in Appendix 2.
elements  Chemical analysis of soil is attached in
Appendix 3
 Shear strength  See theoretical calculation of the shear
strength shown on Section 5.3 “Shear
Strength, Horizontal Subgrade Modulus
Recommendation and other
Parameters”

Document No. Revision Page No.

NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-ZWD-ST-000088 No. 0 Date: August 19, 2021 3
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works
Soil investigation report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

 Samples of soil to be collected every  SP samples are collected every 1.5m

1.0m to 1.5m depth and change of and change of strata as shown on the
strata borelog.
TS 204.2.7.3  Depth of boreholes shall be the  BH-Pile Test (P-877) design length is
Depth of design length plus 3 times diameter 18.0m and the BP diameter is 1500mm.
Bores of bored pile. Theoretical termination depth is
25.139m. The borehole was terminated
at 25.5m.
 For more info on borehole termination
informations, see sketch in Appendix
4.

 Should have at least 3 consecutive N-  The last 3 SPT N- value for BH-Pile
value of ≥ 50. Test (P-877) are 102, 92 and 93.
Siesmic  Contractor to provide liquefaction  The liquefaction analysis is shown as
Evaluation analysis based on the results of the part of the attached soil investigation
soil investigation factual report in Item 6.1.

A complete borelog is already available and the Contractor believes that there is enough data
for the Engineer Designer’s to evaluate the final length of bored piles for BH-Pile Test (P-
877).

4.0 Appendixes

Appendix 1 Factual Geotechnical Investigation Report BH-Pile Test (P-877)

Appendix 2 Test Report on Water

Appendix 3 Test Report on Soil Chemical Test

Appendix 4 Borehole Sketch

Appendix 5 Survey Report

Document No. Revision Page No.

NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-ZWD-ST-000088 No. 0 Date: August 19, 2021 4
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works
Soil investigation report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

APPENDIX 1

Factual Geotechnical Investigation Report BH-Pile

Test (P-877)

Document No. Revision Page No.

NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-ZWD-ST-000088 No. 0 Date: August 19, 2021 5
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

BH-PILE TEST (Pier-877)

North South Commuter Railway

Extension Project CP N-03
San Fernando City, Pampanga

SUBMITTED TO:

ITALIAN-THAI DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC COMPANY LTD.
Vista Verde Resort, Angeles, Pampanga

PREPARED BY:

6
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1

2.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY & GEOMORPHOLOGY ...................................................... 1
3.0 FIELD TEST ................................................................................................... 2
4.0 LABORATORY TEST ....................................................................................... 4
5.0 SURFACE CONDITION.................................................................................... 6
5.1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS.................................................... 6
5.2 GROUND WATER TABLE................................................................................. 7
5.3 SHEAR STRENGTH, HORIZONTAL SUBGRADE MODULUS RECOMMENDATION
AND OTHER PARAMETERS ............................................................................. 7
6.0 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................... 11
6.1 LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS............................................................................ 12
7.0 LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................. 15
APPENDIX A – VICINITY MAP
APPENDIX B – SOIL PROFILE
APPENDIX C – FINAL BORING LOGS
APPENDIX D – LABORATORY RESULTS
APPENDIX E – SITE PHOTOS
APPENDIX F – LIQUEFACTION CALCULATION
REPORT

Page | 0

7
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

1.0 INTRODUCTION
As part of the preliminary engineering requirement of the project, DBAdsuara
Engineering Consultancy (DBAEC) was hired to conduct geotechnical
investigation in order to ensure a rational, safe and economical design and
construction of the North-South Commuter Railway-Expressway. The data
obtained will define the stratigraphy and engineering properties of the soils
underlying the site, particularly the strength and deformation characteristics of
the soil, strata, the soil bearing capacity, groundwater and surface drainage
conditions among others which shall then be used to determine the appropriate
foundation scheme for the proposed structure.

2.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY & GEOMORPHOLOGY

City of San Fernando is a landlocked
component city and a provincial capital
of Pampanga. It is bounded on the
northeast by the municipality of Mexico
around 4.10 km (2.55 miles); southwest
by Bacolor around 5.75 km(3.57 miles) &
by Guagua around 9.51 km (5.91 miles);
west-southwest by Santa Rita around
8.71 km (5.41 miles); south-southeast
by Santo Tomas around 4.10 km (2.55
miles); South by Minalin around 6.85 km
(4.25 miles).
The project site is a seismically active region belonging to the Ilocos-Central
Luzon Basin. According to the Lexicon of Philippines Stratigraphy, Damortis
Formation, Bamban Formation, Cataguintingan Formation and Tarlac Formation
REPORT

may be expected.
And we quote, “Damortis Formation consists of westward dipping sandstones,
calcarenites, siltstones and marl. It rests unconformably over the
Cataguintingan Formation near the type locality. This gently dipping sequence
of clastic rocks commonly contains molluscan fossils. In some places the
sandstones are dark colored due to the presence of heavy minerals. Tamesis
and others (1981) estimate the thickness of the formation to range from 50m
to 200m on the basis of seismic data.
Bamban Formation designates the tuffaceous clastic and tuff section in
Bamban, Tarlac by Corby and others (1951). The basal conglomerate is
massive, fairly well-consolidated, and consists of poorly sorted subangular to
subrounded pebbles, cobbles and small boulders of diorite, andesite and basalt
with minor amounts of scoria cemented by tuffaceous sand and volcanic ash.
It is locally cross-bedded and grades laterally and vertically to the sandstone.

Page | 1

8
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

The sandstone is bedded, fine to coarse grained, fairly sorted, soft, porous,
tuffaceous and consists mainly of angular to subrounded grains of feldspar,
quartz and ferro-magnesian minerals in a fine silt and volcanic ash cement.
Interbedded with the sandstone are thin beds of hard, well cemented and brittle
tuffaceous shale. The tuff is medium to thick bedded, hard, brittle and consists
of well cemented, fine volcanic ash, dust and lapilli. Mafic minerals and small
fragments of scoriaceous materials are dispersed in the tuff.
Cataguintingan Formation consists mainly of tuffaceous sandstones
interbedded with siltstones, shales and conglomerates including minor
limestone lenses. It rests unconformably over the Amlang Formation. This
formation has yielded abundant molluscan shell fragments as well as echinoid
spines, ostracods and red algae. The upper portion of this formation has
proportionately less conglomerate beds than the lower portions. The upper
beds are also more tuffaceous and sometimes exhibit high proportions of
magnetite. It was dated Pliocene by Lorentz (1984) but Maleterre (1989) gives
an age dating of Late Pliocene for this formation.
Tarlac Formation rests conformably over the Malinta Formation and is
unconformably overlain by the Bamban Formation. The shale is sandy and
fossiliferous. The sandstone exhibits spheroidal weathering and has less fossils.
The conglomerate is massive to thin bedded with subangular to subrounded to
flat pebbles, cobbles and boulders of igneous rocks, sandstone and limestone
in a coarse, tuffaceous sandstone matrix.”

3.0 FIELD TEST

The field test conducted at the site consist of Rotary Drilling Technique and
Standard Penetration Test (SPT). The details of drilled borehole are
summarized below.
REPORT

Coordinates
Depth, m
Structure
Borehole

Samples
Existing
Ground

No. of

Date of
Level
No.

Station
Drilling Northing Easting

BH- Pier @ KM July 31

EL. 1671015 459778
PILE No. 69+520 25.5 –Aug. 17
52.720 .893 .951
TEST 877 .000 4,2021

In rotary drilling technique, boring is effected by the cutting action of a rotating

bit that is kept in firm contact with the bottom of the hole. The bit is attached
to the lower end of a hollow drill rod that is rotated by a suitable chuck.

Page | 2

9
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) was conducted at every 1.5 meter depth
interval, observing procedures stipulated in the American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) D-1586. Split spoon samples were obtained and a visual
classification was conducted on all soil samples.
Each borehole was advanced by the wash boring method. This is started by
driving a 4-inch diameter casing first to a depth of 1.05 meter bgs to allow the
conduct of SPT within the next 0.45 meter (18 in.) for a total of 1.5 meter drill
advance. The casing is then cleaned out by means of a chopping bit fastened
to the lower end of a wash pipe that is inserted inside the casing. Water is
forced down through the wash pipe and emerges at a high velocity through
small openings in the chopping bit. It then rises, carrying fragments of soil,
through the annular space between casing and the wash pipe. Upon reaching
the designated depth (1.05 m), the chopping bit is replaced with a standard
spoon sampler (made up of 2-inch outside diameter (O.D.) and 1 & 3/8-inch
inside diameter barrel). The sampler is then used to obtain a soil sample while
penetrating it into the soil through SPT in accordance with ASTM procedures
(ASTM D-1586). On top of a series of rods is the driving head, upon which a
140.0 lb. hammer falls freely from a height of 30”. Seating blows for the first
6-inch penetration of the sampler is done. N-values derived from the borings
are reflected in appropriate columns in the Final Borehole Log in Appendix C. A
number of pictures were taken during the investigation (Appendix E). The
number of blows (N) for the next 12 inches or one foot of penetration of a split-
spoon sampler were then recorded as a measure of the soil relative density or
consistency as given in Table 1 & 2.
TABLE 1
CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION FOR FINE-GRAINED SOILS

Undrained Shear
Classification SPT, N
REPORT

Strength, Su (kPa)

Very Soft <2 <12

Soft 2-4 12-25

Medium 4-8 25-50

Stiff 8-15 50-100

Hard 15-30 100-200

Very Hard >30 >200

From Terzaghi, Peck & Mesri, 1996. & U.S. Navy, 1982

Page | 3

10
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

TABLE 2
CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION FOR COARSE-GRAINED SOILS

Relative Density, Dr
Classification SPT, N
(%)

Very Loose <4 0-15

Loose 4-10 15-35

Medium Dense 10-30 36-65

Dense 30-50 65-85

Very Dense >50 85-100

From Terzaghi, Peck & Mesri, 1996. & Lambe and Whitman, 1969

4.0 LABORATORY TEST

All recovered soil samples were visually identified and logged at the site. They
were placed inside the airtight plastic bags before transporting them to the
office of ITALIAN-THAI DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC COMPANY LTD. in coordination
with Greater Capital Railway Consortium (GCR) representative for inspection
and selection of sample that will be delivered in laboratory testing. All
Geotechnical laboratory testing was conducted in accordance with the American
Standard for Testing and Material (ASTM) procedures by UNIVERSAL TESTING
LABORATORY AND INSPECTION, INC, DBAEC and REYNALDO GUEVARRA
ENTERPRISES.
 Grain Size Analysis - ASTM D422
REPORT

This method covers the quantitative determination of the distribution of

particle sizes of soils.
Soil was passed through a series of sieves, the weight of soil retained in
each sieve determined and recorded. For each sample analyzed, a gradation
curve was drawn based on the percent finer weight.
 Determination of Moisture Content - ASTM D2216
This method covers the laboratory determination of the water (moisture)
content of soil by weight.
The moisture content of a material is defined as the ratio, expressed as a
percentage, of the mass of pore water in a given mass of material to the
mass of the solid material particles.

Page | 4

11
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

 Atterberg Limit Test per ASTM D4318

This test method covers the determination of the liquid limit, plastic limit,
and the plasticity index of soils.
Liquid Limit of Soils
The liquid limit of a soil is the water content expressed as a percentage of
the weight of the oven-dried soil after attaining the condition between the
liquid and plastic states.
Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils
The plastic limit of a soil is the water content, expressed as a percentage of
the mass of the oven-dried soil after attaining the condition between the
plastic and semi-solid states.
Plasticity Index is defined as the difference between the liquid and plastic
limits of the soil.
 Soil Classification Tests per ASTM D2487
This standard describes a system for classifying mineral and organic-mineral
soils for engineering purposes based on laboratory determination of particle
size characteristics, liquid limit and plasticity index.
 pH of Soils per ASTM D4972
This test method covers the measurement of the pH of soils for uses other
than for corrosion testing. Such measurements are used in the agricultural,
environmental, and natural resources fields. This measurement determines
the degree of acidity or alkalinity in soil materials suspended in water and a
0.01 M calcium chloride solution.
 Sulfate Ion in Water per ASTM D516
REPORT

This test method covers the determination of sulphate in water in the range
from 1 to 40 mg/L of sulphate ion. A solution containing glycerine and
sodium chloride is added to stabilize the suspension and minimixe
interferences. The result of turbidity is determined by a nephelometer,
spectrophotometer, or photoelectric colorimeter and compared to a curve
prepared from standard sulphate solutions.
 Chloride Ion in Water per ASTM D512
This test method covers the determination of chloride ion in water,
wastewater and brines. Dilute mercuric nitrate solution is added to an
acidified sample in the presence of mixed diphenylcarbazonebromophenol
blue indicator. The end point of the titration is the formation of the blue-
violet mercury diphenylcarbazone complex.

Page | 5

12
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

5.0 SURFACE CONDITION

Overburden soil deposit was encountered up to 25.5 m below the ground

surface. Based on the findings from the exploratory borehole drilled, sand and
silt may be considered representative of the deposits in the area. The
descriptions of these deposits are follows:
Sand: (USCS Classification – SM, SP, SP-SM): This deposit was encountered
in BH-PILE TEST (0.0 m to 16.5 m, 19.95 m to 25.5 m) below the ground
surface. It has a SPT N-value of 7 to 155 indicating loose to very dense
consistency.
Silt: (USCS Classification –MH): This deposit was encountered in BH-PILE
TEST (16.5 m to 19.95 m) below the ground surface. It has a SPT N-value
of 59 to 101 indicating hard to very hard consistency.
Appendix B shows the interpreted soil profile. The properties of the soil deposits
between borings are not expected to deviate significantly but the thickness and
depth may vary more.

5.1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

TABLE 3
Classification
Soil Sample

Atterberg Sieve Analysis

Depth, m

BH
NMC

Limits % Passing
Soil
No.

No.

LL PI 4 10 40 200
REPORT

3.0 2 SP 14.76 NP NP 57 44 27 5
4.5 3 SP 9.99 NP NP 62 33 17 3
7.5 5 SP-SM 11.21 NP NP 87 44 16 6
9.0 6 SM 43.16 NP NP 95 81 60 26
10.5 7 SP 20.36 NP NP 100 97 35 3
PILE
TEST 13.5 9 SM 21.19 NP NP 99 90 65 17
15.0 10 SM 31.07 55 20 99 94 67 42
16.5 11 SP-SM 11.84 NP NP 91 55 33 9
19.95 13A MH 25.15 60 22 98 89 80 51
21.0 14 SP 17.73 NP NP 95 78 33 5
24.0 16 SM 26.79 NP NP 99 99 64 19

Page | 6

13
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

5.2 GROUND WATER TABLE

After the removal of the casings, the water inside the boreholes were bailed
out and measured. The ground water level was encountered at around 4.85
meters below the existing ground level.

5.3 SHEAR STRENGTH, HORIZONTAL SUBGRADE MODULUS

RECOMMENDATION AND OTHER PARAMETERS

The SPT N-value observed during testing is not utilized directly in assessing soil
properties. These values are corrected to account for the overburden pressure.
Corrected N values are between 5-37 blows with relative density of loose to
dense for sand.
Correlations with SPT N values from Peck et al. (1974), David F. McCarthy,
Wilun and Starzewski were used to determine the angle of shearing resistance
or angle of friction (ϕ) and unit weight (ɣ). Modulus of subgrade reaction for
vertical and horizontal has been determine using NAVFAC (1986), Simons &
Menzies in Table 4. It should be noted that B is the pile width / diameter.
For Cohesionless Soils – (Sand); Cohesion (c) = 0 (Peck et al. [1974])
Ø’=27.1+0.3N60-0.00054[N60]
For Sandy Silts (Polish Code – PN 59/B 03020, 1959, Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering by Wilun & Starzewski, v.1)

Relative Soil Approximate

Approximate Angle of
N Condition Cohesion
Internal Friction (ø)
(Relative Density) (kg/m2)
REPORT

<4 Soft 200 – 1,500 2 – 10

4–8 Firm 1,500 – 2,050 10 – 16
8 – 15 Stiff 2,050 – 3,000 16 – 20
15 – 30 Very Stiff 3,000 – 4,000 20 - 25
>30 Hard >4,000

Page | 7

14
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

For Sandy Clay and Silty Clay (Polish Code – PN 59/B 03020, 1959, Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering by Wilun & Starzewski, v.1)

Relative Soil Approximate

Approximate Angle of
N Condition Cohesion
Internal Friction (ø)
(Relative Density) (kg/m2)
<4 Soft 1,000 – 4,100 0–2
4–8 Firm 4,100 – 5,100 2–5
8 – 15 Stiff 5,100 – 6,100 5–8
15 – 30 Very Stiff 6,100 – 8,200 8 – 10
>30 Hard >8,200

For Clayey Sand, Clayey Silts, Clayey Sandy Silts (Polish Code – PN 59/B 03020,
1959, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering by Wilun & Starzewski, v.1)

Relative Soil Approximate

Approximate Angle of
N Condition Cohesion
Internal Friction (ø)
(Relative Density) (kg/m2)
<4 Soft 300 – 2,050 5–7
4–8 Firm 2,050 – 3,00 7 – 12
8 – 15 Stiff 3,000 – 4,000 12 – 16
15 – 30 Very Stiff 4,000 – 5,000 16 – 20
>30 Hard >5,000

Empirical determination of Unit Weight (ɣ)

Above Water Table Below Water Table

N
(kg/m3) (kg/m3)
REPORT

2–4 1,437 798

5 – 10 1,597 898
11 – 20 1,756 958
21 – 30 1,916 1,038
31 – 40 1,996 1,118
41 – 50 2,076 1,198
>50 2,156 1,278

Page | 8

15
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (NAVFAC, 1986)

Values of k for cohesive soils (Simons & Menzies, 2001)

Undrained strength
50 to 100 100 to 200 200 to 400
of clay, Su (kPa)

k (kN/m3) 8,000 16,000 32,000

For long piles, β L > 2.25 For short piles, β L < 2.25

݇ 1‫ ܮ‬+ 3‫݇ ܤ‬
݇௛ = 0.4 ݇௛ = ൬ ൰
‫ܤ‬ 5‫ܮ‬ ‫ܤ‬

The deflections depend primarily on the dimensionless length β L,

REPORT

ଵൗ
݇௛ ‫ܤ‬ ସ
ߚ=ቆ ቇ
‫ܧ‬௣ ‫ܫ‬௣

Values of k for cohesionless soils (Simons & Menzies, 2001)

‫ݖ‬
݇௛ = ݊௛
‫ܤ‬

Values of nh for granular soils

Relative density of sand Loose Medium Dense

nh (dry or moist) (kN/m3) 750 2250 6000
nh (submerged) (kN/m3) 400 1500 3600

Page | 9

16
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

REPORT

Page | 10

17
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

6.0 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS

A peak ground acceleration of 0.3g may be expected on site during intense

earthquakes. This is based on the assumption of 500 –year return period on
rock site (Figure 1).

Figure 1 (Source: https://hazardhunter.georisk.gov.ph/)

Based on the initial findings of the exploration, the following parameters may
be used for seismic design as required by the National Structural Code of the
Philippines 2015.
REPORT

• Importance Factor, I - 1.00

• Soil Type Profile, S - SD
• Seismic Zone Factor, Z - 0.4
• Seismic Zone Type -A
• Near source factor, Na - 1.0
• Near source factor, Nv - 1.0
• Seismic Coefficient, Ca - 0.44Na
• Seismic Coefficient, Cv - 0.64Nv
• Estimated Distance to seismic source - 39.5 Km (Figure 2)

Page | 11

18
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

Figure 2 (Source: http://faultfinder.phivolcs.dost.gov.ph/)

6.1 LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Soil liquefaction describes a phenomenon where a saturated or partially

saturated soil substantially loses strength and stiffness in response to an
applied stress, usually earthquakes shaking or other sudden change in stress
condition, causing it to behave like a liquid. The phenomenon is most often
observed in saturated, loose (low density or uncompacted), sandy soils. This is
REPORT

because loose sand has a tendency to compress when a load is applied; dense
sands by contrast tend to expand in volume or dilate. If the soil is saturated by
water, a condition that often exists when the soil is below the ground water
table or sea level, then water fills the gaps between soil grains ('pore spaces').
In response to the soil compressing, this water increases in pressure and
attempts to flow out from the soil to zones of low pressure (usually upward
towards the ground surface). However, if the loading is rapidly applied and
large enough, or is repeated many times (e.g. earthquake shaking, storm wave
loading) such that it does not flow out in time before the next cycle of load is
applied, the water pressures may build to an extent where they exceed the
contact stresses between the grains of soil that keep them in contact with each
other. These contacts between grains are the means by which the weight from
buildings and overlying soil layers are transferred from the ground surface to
layers of soil or rock at greater depths. This loss of soil structure causes it to

Page | 12

19
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

lose all of its strength (the ability to transfer shear stress) and it may be
observed to flow like a liquid (hence 'liquefaction').
For a cohesive material to become susceptible to liquefaction, it must meet all
the following criteria:
• The soil must have less than 15% of the particles that are finer than
0.005 mm
• The soil must have a liquid limit that is less than 35, and
• The water content of the soil must be greater than 0.9 of the liquid
limit
Present cohesive materials indicates a low relative densities that are prone to
liquefaction. Moreover, PHIVOLCS identified the area to be moderately
susceptible (Figure 3) liquefiable.
REPORT

Figure 3 (Source: https://hazardhunter.georisk.gov.ph/)

To further investigate the liquefaction potential of the sand deposits a

quantitative analysis was also conducted using the N values obtained from
standard penetration tests. Using a soil liquefaction analysis software for the
assessment of liquefaction potential based on SPT using the most recent and
well-known deterministic and probabilistic methods. In this method the Critical
Resistance Ratio (CRR) and the Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR) are calculated. The
factor of safety (FS) against liquefaction is estimated by dividing CRR and CSR.
The values of the factors of safety are then plotted and presented in Appendix
F. The peak ground acceleration value of 0.3g was used to analyze the
liquefaction.

Page | 13

20
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

REPORT

Page | 14

21
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

7.0 LIMITATIONS
The samples taken and used for testing and the observations are believed to
be representative of the entire area. However, the writer should be contacted
during design modification of the structure to determine the load distribution.
Any changes in the conditions will be evaluated and the foundation designs
may be adjusted or alternate designs may be recommended.

Evaluated by:

DON B. ADSUARA, MSCE (Geotechnical), M.ASEP, DMPR

Consultant
PRC # 98546
REPORT

Page | 15

22
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

APPENDIX
APPENDIX

23
PROJECT: LOCATION: TITLE: APPENDIX

North South Commuter Railway

Extension Project CP N-03
(Pier - 877) San Fernando City,
Pampanga VICINITY MAP A
SOURCE: GOOGLE MAP

Northing: 1671015.893
Easting: 459778.951

SITE

24
PROJECT: LOCATION: TITLE: APPENDIX:
North South Commuter (Pier - 877) San
SOIL PROFILE B
Railway Extension Project Fernando City, SCALE:
CP N-03 Pampanga N.T.S.

LEGEND:
SPT BLOW COUNT
N=x (x=N-value)

GROUND WATER LEVEL

RECOVERY (%)
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION
(RQD in %)

BH-PILE TEST
N-BLOWS
10 20 30 40 50
REC & RQD
20 40 60 80100
0

1
N=7

N=32
3

4
N=27

N=30
6

7
N=32

8 SAND
N=27
9

10
N=24

11

N=29
12

13
N=37

14

N=23
15

16
N=58

17

N=59
18

19
SILT
N=65
N=101
20

N=155
21

22

23
N=102
SAND
N=92
24

25
N=93
25.5

25
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

APPENDIX C
FINAL BORING LOGS
APPENDIX

26
 In partnership of:
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Works and Highways

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG

Proposed Project : North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03 Date Started : 31-July-21
Location : (Pier - 877) San Fernando City, Pampanga Date Completed : 4-August-21
Borehole No. : PILE TEST Final Depth : 25.5 m
Weather : Fair Groundwater Level : 4.85 m
Existing Ground Level : 52.720 Type of Sampler Diameter Length
Coordinates (GPS) : Northing -1671015.893 , Easting - 459778.951 Split Barrel 5.08 cm 0.45 m
Shelby Tube 5.08 cm 0.45 m
Core Barrel 5.08 cm 1.5 m
Wt. of Drive Hammer 63.5 kg.
Sheet 1 of 2
Depth Sampling Type of Rec. SPT Blows N- Sample N-Value Soil / Rock Description Soil
Consistency R.Q.D. Remarks
(m) Depth (m) Sampling (%) Per 15 cm Value No. (Graphical) (Visual Classification) Symbol
0 20 40 60
0.0
0.0

Standard
Penetration gray, poorly graded SAND with gravel SP
Test (SPT)
1.0

1.05
1.50 67 3 2 5 7 SS-01 loose - 1.5

2.0
Standard
gray, poorly graded SAND with gravel SP
Penetration
Test (SPT)

2.55
3.0
3.0 3.00 76 9 15 17 32 SS-02 dense -

Standard
gray, poorly graded SAND with gravel SP
Penetration
4.0 Test (SPT)

4.05
4.50 82 8 12 15 27 SS-03 dense - 4.5

5.0
Standard
gray, poorly graded SAND with silt SP-SM
Penetration
Test (SPT)

5.55 6.0
6.0 6.00 67 10 14 16 30 SS-04 dense -

Standard
gray, poorly graded SAND with silt SP-SM
Penetration
7.0 Test (SPT)

7.05
7.5
7.50 67 10 15 17 32 SS-05 dense -

8.0 Standard
gray, silty SAND SM
Penetration
Test (SPT)

8.55
9.0 9.00 100 8 12 15 27 SS-06 dense - 9.0

Standard
gray, poorly graded SAND SP
Penetration
Test (SPT)
10.0

10.05
10.5
10.50 67 12 10 14 24 SS-07 med. dense -

11.0 Standard
gray, silty SAND SM
Penetration
Test (SPT)

11.55
12.0 12.00 67 14 12 17 29 SS-08 dense - 12.0

Standard
Penetration gray, silty SAND SM
13.0 Test (SPT)

13.05
13.50 96 12 14 23 37 SS-09 dense - 13.5

TYPE OF SAMPLING SOIL TYPES Cohesive Soils Granular Soils Rock Quality Designation, RQD
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Clay N-Value Consistency N-Value Consistency RQD, % Description
Undisturbed Sampling (US) Silt 0-1 Very Soft 0-4 Very Loose <25 Very Poor
Coring ( C ) Sand 2-4 Soft 5 - 10 Loose 25 - 50 Poor
Gravel 5-8 Med. Stiff 11 - 24 Med. Dense 51 - 75 Fair
Shell 9 - 15 Stiff 25 - 50 Dense 76 - 90 Good
Tuff 16 - 30 Very Stiff >50 Very Dense >90 Excellent
31 - 60 Hard
>60 Very Hard

Prepared By:
27
Renante Dela Cruz, MSCE
Geotechnical Engineer
 In partnership of:
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Works and Highways

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG

Proposed Project : North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03 Date Started : 31-July-21
Location : (Pier - 877) San Fernando City, Pampanga Date Completed : 4-August-21
Borehole No. : PILE TEST Final Depth : 25.5 m
Weather : Fair Groundwater Level : 4.85 m
Existing Ground Level : 52.72 Type of Sampler Diameter Length
Coordinates (GPS) : Northing -1671015.893 , Easting - 459778.951 Split Barrel 5.08 cm 0.45 m
Shelby Tube 5.08 cm 0.45 m
Core Barrel 5.08 cm 1.5 m
Wt. of Drive Hammer 63.5 kg.
Sheet 2 of 2
Depth Sampling Type of Rec. SPT Blows N- Sample N-Value Soil / Rock Description Soil
Consistency R.Q.D. Remarks
(m) Depth (m) Sampling (%) Per 15 cm Value No. (Graphical) (Visual Classification) Symbol
0 20 40 60
13.5
13.5

14.0 Standard
Penetration gray, silty SAND SM
Test (SPT)

14.55
15.0 15.00 56 5 9 14 23 SS-10 med. dense - 15.0

Standard
gray, poorly graded SAND with silt SP-SM
Penetration
16.0 Test (SPT)

16.05
16.5
16.50 67 14 24 34 58 SS-11 very dense -

17.0
Standard
gray, sandy elastic SILT MH
Penetration
Test (SPT)

17.55
18.0 18.00 78 18 29 30 59 SS-12 hard - 18.0

Standard
NO RECOVERY -
Penetration
Test (SPT)
19.0

19.05
19.5
19.50 0 14 27 38 65 SS-13 - -
Standard gray, sandy elastic SILT MH
19.50 Penetration
19.95 100 19 49 52 101 SS-13A very hard -
20.0
Standard
gray, poorly graded SAND SP
Penetration
Test (SPT)
20.55
21.0 21.00 53 32 72 83 155 SS-14 very dense - 21.0

Standard
gray, silty SAND SM
Penetration
Test (SPT)
22.0

22.05
22.5
22.50 73 29 46 56 102 SS-15 very dense -

23.0
Standard
gray, silty SAND SM
Penetration
Test (SPT)

23.55
24.0 24.00 62 37 43 49 92 SS-16 very dense - 24.0

Standard
Penetration gray, silty SAND SM
Test (SPT)
25.0

25.05
25.50 89 43 40 53 93 SS-17 very dense -
25.5

TYPE OF SAMPLING SOIL TYPES Cohesive Soils Granular Soils Rock Quality Designation, RQD
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Clay N-Value Consistency N-Value Consistency RQD, % Description
Undisturbed Sampling (US) Silt 0-1 Very Soft 0-4 Very Loose <25 Very Poor
Coring ( C ) Sand 2-4 Soft 5 - 10 Loose 25 - 50 Poor
Gravel 5-8 Med. Stiff 11 - 24 Med. Dense 51 - 75 Fair
Shell 9 - 15 Stiff 25 - 50 Dense 76 - 90 Good
Tuff 16 - 30 Very Stiff >50 Very Dense >90 Excellent
31 - 60 Hard
>60 Very Hard

Prepared By:
28
Renante Dela Cruz, MSCE
Geotechnical Engineer
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

APPENDIX D
LABORATORY RESULTS
APPENDIX

29
 1 /0 + ) ! .   (%! * 0   ) #" % !  " * #&'$ %)
&  )

HJGB=;L7 * DGI= /DJI=  DB B JI:G. 6>AL 6N! MI:CH>DC ,GD?

: 8I , *  

DG;8LAGF7 /6C " : GC6C9D  >IN ,6B E6C<6

/ ) ,(! %  ,>A: 0 : HI
,   
KGMJ;=7 KZeV
/ ) ,(!  /1  ) %0 0 !  4  1 0 (%%. : EG: H: CI6I>K:
0 ! /0 . ! - 1 %. !  ) D>HIJG:  DCI:CI

* # %  &    ' # " ! # & ' ( %   # " '  " '   '  % ! "  ' # "

D`TReZ`_ //  //  //  //  // 
 6C * JB 7 : G . / 0 1 2
3 : ><=ID;86C L : IHD>A < .6/+23 /10+52 /-.+-3 /-/+15 .65+61
3 : ><=ID;86C 9GNHD>A < .4-+21 //0+4- .5/+41 .14+05 .36+11
3 : ><=ID;L 6I:G < //+-/ /-+.2 .5+0/ 22+.- /6+2-
3 : ><=ID;86C < /.+01 /.+6. .6+/4 .6+4/ /1+23
3 : ><=ID;9GNHD>A < .16+/- /-.+46 .30+14 ./4+33 .11+55
) D>HIJG:  DCI:CI  .1+43 6+66 ..+/. 10+.3 /-+03

D`TReZ`_ //  //   //   //   6 //  
 6C * JB 7 : G 3 4 5 6 .-
3 : ><=ID;86C L : IHD>A < /.5+4/ /.6+5/ .42+03 02.+22 .33+-4
3 : ><=ID;86C 9GNHD>A < .50+5- .40+22 .25+53 /52+.. .10+60
3 : ><=ID;L 6I:G < 01+6/ 13+/4 .3+2- 33+11 //+.1
3 : ><=ID;86C < .6+-. /1+3. .6+21 /-+64 .6+-6
3 : ><=ID;9GNHD>A < .31+46 .15+61 .06+0/ /31+.1 ./1+51
) D>HIJG:  DCI:CI  /.+.6 0.+-4 ..+51 /2+.2 .4+40

J=E8JCK7 0 =>HG: EDGI>HI=: G: HJAID;I:HIE: G;DGB : 9 DC I=: H6B EA: HJ7 B >II:9

0 : HI:9 7 N  =: 8@: 9 7 N  : GI>;>: 9 7 N

             
    
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG6IDGN/JE: GK>HDG (67 DG6IDGN) 6C6<: G

30
 1 /0 + ) ! .   (%! * 0   ) #" % !  " * #&'$ %)
&  )

HJGB=;L7 * DGI= /DJI=  DB B JI:G. 6>AL 6N! MI:CH>DC ,GD?

: 8I , *  

DG;8LAGF7 /6C " : GC6C9D  >IN ,6B E6C<6

/ ) ,(! %  ,>A: 0 : HI
,   
KGMJ;=7 KZeV
/ ) ,(!  /1  ) %0 0 !  4  1 0 (%%. : EG: H: CI6I>K:
0 ! /0 . ! - 1 %. !  ) D>HIJG:  DCI:CI

* # %  &    ' # " ! # & ' ( %   # " '  " '   '  % ! "  ' # "

D`TReZ`_ //   // // // //
 6C * JB 7 : G .. ./ .0 .1 .2
3 : ><=ID;86C L : IHD>A < /1/+5/ -+-- -+-- -+-- -+--
3 : ><=ID;86C 9GNHD>A < .62+65 -+-- -+-- -+-- -+--
3 : ><=ID;L 6I:G < 13+51 -+-- -+-- -+-- -+--
3 : ><=ID;86C < /.+.0 -+-- -+-- -+-- -+--
3 : ><=ID;9GNHD>A < .41+52 -+-- -+-- -+-- -+--
) D>HIJG:  DCI:CI  /3+46 #<AN,-! #<AN,-! #<AN,-! #<AN,-!

D`TReZ`_
 6C * JB 7 : G
3 : ><=ID;86C L : IHD>A <
3 : ><=ID;86C 9GNHD>A <
3 : ><=ID;L 6I:G <
3 : ><=ID;86C <
3 : ><=ID;9GNHD>A <
) D>HIJG:  DCI:CI 

J=E8JCK7 0 =>HG: EDGI>HI=: G: HJAID;I:HIE: G;DGB : 9 DC I=: H6B EA: HJ7 B >II:9

0 : HI:9 7 N  =: 8@: 9 7 N  : GI>;>: 9 7 N

                  
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG6IDGN) 6C6<: G

31
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "   '  & '   ' 
&&
*
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B ),1'*( 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B ),*'0(
                        /%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
 & ' !     AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C< ,6H H >C< . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
 A>: CI  7,10,3 ' / ,0 .8.1452 .37 4 7- 0" 42 - .16+/- .--
,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *      30 -+-- .16+/- .--
 $ * D ,>A: 0 : H I
,    //   //  /" 2- -+-- .16+/- .--
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :    04+2 -+-- .16+/- .--
." /2 -+-- .16+/- .--

'%("

)%."

#'&
)%*"

#*&
)"

("

'"

#*
0,1" .6 5+-6 .1.+.. 62
2705431615
( '%("

.,/" ./+2 /.+4/ ..6+06 5-

#(&&
 

0,5" 6+2 ./+2. .-3+55 4/

'&& F` +1 1+42 /.+46 52+-6 24
F` +.- /+66 /-+-6 32+-- 11
/& F` +1- -+1/2 /1+05 1-+3/ /4
F` +/-- -+-42 00+26 4+-0 2
.& H 8F -+30
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   3+1-
-& L G L 8D .16+/-
           


,&
&&
+
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B *()'/1 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B )1.'(-
+&
/%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
*& AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C< ,6H H >C< . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
)& 0" 42 - /-.+46 .--
   30 -+-- /-.+46 .--
(& /" 2- -+-- /-.+46 .--
   04+2 -+-- /-.+46 .--
'& ." /2 /3+2- .42+/6 54
0,1" .6 -+-- .42+/6 54
& .,/" ./+2 /+52 .4/+11 52
'&& '& ' &$' &$&' 0,5" 6+2 2+45 .33+33 50
     "   F` +1 1+42 1.+42 ./1+6. 3/
F` +.- /+66 24+10 34+15 00
F` +1- -+1/2 01+-1 00+11 .4
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9 F` +/-- -+-42 /4+14 2+64 0
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N  H 8F -+/0
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   2+41
  
     L G L 8D /-.+46
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N /J E: G K >H DG (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

32
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "   '  & '   ' 
&&
-
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B ).+',/ 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B )-+'1.
                            /%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
 & ' !     AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C<  ,6H H >C<  . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
 A>: CI  7,10,3 ' / ,0 .8.1452 .37 4 7- 0" 42 - .30+14 .--
,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *      30 -+-- .30+14 .--
 $ * D ,>A: 0 : H I
,    //   //  /" 2- -+-- .30+14 .--
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :    04+2 -+-- .30+14 .--
." /2 -+-- .30+14 .--

'%("

)%."

#'&
)%*"

#*&
)"

("

'"

#*
0,1" .6 -+-- .30+14 .--
2705431615
( '%("

.,/" ./+2 .-+4. .2/+43 60

#(&&
0,5" 6+2 0+6. .15+52 6.
'&& F` +1 1+42 4+0/ .1.+20 54
F` +.- /+66 4-+01 4.+.6 11
/& F` +1- -+1/2 12+5- /2+06 .3
F` +/-- -+-42 .2+31 6+42 3
.& H 8F -+/1
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   6+2.
-& L G L 8D .30+14
           


,&
&&
.
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B )*/'.. 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B 1,'))
+&
/%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
*& AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C<  ,6H H >C<  . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
)& 0" 42 - ./4+33 .--
   30 -+-- ./4+33 .--
(& /" 2- -+-- ./4+33 .--
   04+2 -+-- ./4+33 .--
'& ." /2 -+-- ./4+33 .--
0,1" .6 -+-- ./4+33 .--
& .,/" ./+2 -+-- ./4+33 .--
'&& '& ' &$' &$&' 0,5" 6+2 -+1. ./4+/2 .--
     "   F` +1 1+42 2+1- ./.+52 62
F` +.- /+66 .5+// .-0+30 5.
F` +1- -+1/2 /3+2/ 44+.. 3-
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9 F` +/-- -+-42 10+1- 00+4. /3
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N  H 8F -+.3
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   00+22
  
     L G L 8D ./4+33
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N /J E: G K >H DG (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

33
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "   '  & '   ' 
&&
/
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B ),,'00 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B ),)'-1
                            /%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
 & ' !     AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C<  ,6H H >C<  . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
 A>: CI  7,10,3 ' / ,0 .8.1452 .37 4 7- 0" 42 - .11+55 .--
,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *      30 -+-- .11+55 .--
 $ * D ,>A: 0 : H I
,    //   //  /" 2- -+-- .11+55 .--
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :    04+2 -+-- .11+55 .--
." /2 -+-- .11+55 .--

'%("

)%."

#'&
)%*"

#*&
)"

("

'"

#*
0,1" .6 -+-- .11+55 .--
2705431615
( '%("

.,/" ./+2 -+-- .11+55 .--

#(&&
0,5" 6+2 -+-- .11+55 .--
'&& F` +1 1+42 -+-- .11+55 .--
F` +.- /+66 1+-6 .1-+46 64
/& F` +1- -+1/2 6-+/4 2-+2/ 02
F` +/-- -+-42 13+05 1+.1 0
.& H 8F -+52
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   0+/6
-& L G L 8D .11+55
           


,&
&&
1
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B ).,'/1 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B )+/'..
+&
/%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
*& AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C<  ,6H H >C<  . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
)& 0" 42 - .31+46 .--
   30 -+-- .31+46 .--
(& /" 2- -+-- .31+46 .--
   04+2 -+-- .31+46 .--
'& ." /2 -+-- .31+46 .--
0,1" .6 -+-- .31+46 .--
& .,/" ./+2 -+-- .31+46 .--
'&& '& ' &$' &$&' 0,5" 6+2 -+-- .31+46 .--
     "   F` +1 1+42 .+3- .30+.6 66
F` +.- /+66 .1+65 .15+/. 6-
F` +1- -+1/2 1-+54 .-4+01 32
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9 F` +/-- -+-42 46+63 /4+05 .4
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N  H 8F -+/2
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   /4+.0
  
     L G L 8D .31+46
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N /J E: G K >H DG (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

34
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "   '  & '   ' 
& &
)(
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B ),0'1, 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B 0.'.-
                        /%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
 & ' !     AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C< ,6H H >C< . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
 A>: CI  7,10,3 ' / ,0 .8.1452 .37 4 7- 0" 42 - .15+61 .--
,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *      30 -+-- .15+61 .--
 $ * D ,>A: 0 : H I
,    //    //   /" 2- -+-- .15+61 .--
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :    04+2 -+-- .15+61 .--
." /2 -+-- .15+61 .--

'%("

)%."

#'&
)%*"

#*&
)"

("

'"

#*
0,1" .6 -+-- .15+61 .--
2705431615
( '%("

.,/" ./+2 -+-- .15+61 .--

#(&&
 

0,5" 6+2 -+-- .15+61 .--

'&& F` +1 1+42 .+0/ .14+3/ 66
F` +.- /+66 5+02 .06+/4 61
/& F` +1- -+1/2 06+-0 .--+/1 34
F` +/-- -+-42 04+43 3/+15 1/
.& H 8F -+.6
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   3/+/6
-& L G L 8D .15+61
           


,&
& &
))
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B )+1'+* 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B )*/'++
+&
/%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
*& AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C< ,6H H >C< . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
)& 0" 42 - .06+0/ .--
   30 -+-- .06+0/ .--
(& /" 2- -+-- .06+0/ .--
   04+2 -+-- .06+0/ .--
'& ." /2 -+-- .06+0/ .--
0,1" .6 -+-- .06+0/ .--
& .,/" ./+2 0+44 .02+22 64
'&& '& ' &$' &$&' 0,5" 6+2 -+34 .01+55 64
     "   F` +1 1+42 5+13 ./3+1/ 6.
F` +.- /+66 2-+1. 43+-. 22
F` +1- -+1/2 0-+0- 12+4. 00
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9 F` +/-- -+-42 00+11 ./+/4 6
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N  H 8F -+/5
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   ..+66
  
     L G L 8D .06+0/
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N /J E: G K >H DG (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

35
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "   '  & '   ' 
& &
)+H
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B *.,'), 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B )+('(0
                        /%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
 & ' !     AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C< ,6H H >C< . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
 A>: CI  7,10,3 ' / ,0 .8.1452 .37 4 7- 0" 42 - /31+.1 .--
,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *      30 -+-- /31+.1 .--
 $ * D ,>A: 0 : H I
,    //   6 /" 2- -+-- /31+.1 .--
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :    04+2 -+-- /31+.1 .--
." /2 -+-- /31+.1 .--

'%("

)%."

#'&
)%*"

#*&
)"

("

'"

#*
0,1" .6 -+-- /31+.1 .--
2705431615
( '%("

.,/" ./+2 -+-- /31+.1 .--

#(&&
 

0,5" 6+2 /+// /3.+6/ 66

'&& F` +1 1+42 /+06 /26+20 65
F` +.- /+66 /1+33 /01+54 56
/& F` +1- -+1/2 //+10 /./+11 5-
F` +/-- -+-42 45+/0 .01+/. 2.
.& H 8F -+.2
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   .01+-3
-& L G L 8D /31+.1
           


,&
& &
),
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B )*,'0, 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B ))1',-
+&
/%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
*& AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C< ,6H H >C< . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
)& 0" 42 - ./1+51 .--
   30 -+-- ./1+51 .--
(& /" 2- -+-- ./1+51 .--
   04+2 -+-- ./1+51 .--
'& ." /2 -+-- ./1+51 .--
0,1" .6 -+-- ./1+51 .--
& .,/" ./+2 -+-- ./1+51 .--
'&& '& ' &$' &$&' 0,5" 6+2 .+-4 ./0+44 66
     "   F` +1 1+42 2+-. ..5+43 62
F` +.- /+66 /.+14 64+/6 45
F` +1- -+1/2 23+-1 1.+/2 00
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9 F` +/-- -+-42 02+05 2+54 2
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N  H 8F -+15
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   2+06
  
     L G L 8D ./1+51
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N /J E: G K >H DG (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

36
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "   '  & '   ' 
& &
).
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B )/,'0- 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B ),)'*.
                        /%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
 & ' !     AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C< ,6H H >C< . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
 A>: CI  7,10,3 ' / ,0 .8.1452 .37 4 7- 0" 42 - .41+52 .--
,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *      30 -+-- .41+52 .--
 $ * D ,>A: 0 : H I
,    //    // /" 2- -+-- .41+52 .--
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :    04+2 -+-- .41+52 .--
." /2 -+-- .41+52 .--

'%("

)%."

#'&
)%*"

#*&
)"

("

'"

#*
0,1" .6 -+-- .41+52 .--
2705431615
( '%("

.,/" ./+2 -+-- .41+52 .--

#(&&
 

0,5" 6+2 -+-- .41+52 .--

'&& F` +1 1+42 .+/2 .40+3- 66
F` +.- /+66 -+01 .40+/3 66
/& F` +1- -+1/2 3-+3/ ../+31 31
F` +/-- -+-42 45+51 00+5- .6
.& H 8F -+/.
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   00+26
-& L G L 8D .41+52
           


,&
&&
(
+ 2 ! *  . 4 3 I <B ('(( 3 6H = + 2 ! *  G N 3 I <B ('((
+&
/%! 2 ! /%5 ! O e+ ;M EEM D8L AN =
*& AF;@ ^ ^ J V eR Z_ V U 3 I ,6H H >C< ,6H H >C< . : I6>C: 9
X^ d X^ d
)& 0" 42 - -+-- #<AN ,-!
   30 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
(& /" 2- -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
   04+2 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
'& ." /2 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
0,1" .6 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
& .,/" ./+2 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
'&& '& ' &$' &$&' 0,5" 6+2 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
     "   F` +1 1+42 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
F` +.- /+66 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
F` +1- -+1/2 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9 F` +/-- -+-42 -+-- -+-- #<AN ,-!
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N  H 8F -+--
3 6H = (DH H ,6H H >C<* D   -+--
  
     L G L 8D -+--
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N /J E: G K >H DG (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

37
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "  

                     
         
        
 & ' !     
'$(&
 A>: CI 7
,10,3 ' / ,0  .8.1452 .37 4 7-

,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *   
'$&&
 $ * D ,>A: 0: H I
,    //  // 
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :
&$.&

         
'  & '   ' 

&$,&
(%- 1 % (%) %0
&&
* >@ &&
+ >@
0 G >6A * D . / 0 . / 0
* D D; ADL H . : FJ >G : 9 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 &$*&
* D D; ADL H
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A
&$(&
  3 : ><=I D; >H =
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A
   ) D>H IJ G : &$&&
FH FH '& '&&
,( /0 % (%) %0       ! 
&&
* >@ &&
+ >@
>H = * D . / . /
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A   
    
  
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A
  3 : ><=I D; >H = &&
* KH # G 6N : CH : ,DDG AN <G 69: 9 /6C9 L >I= # G 6K : A D;* D ,A6H I>8>IN
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A &&
+ KH # G 6N B : 9>J B 9: CH : ,DDG AN <G 69: 9 /6C9 L >I= # G 6K : A D;* D ,A6H I>8>IN
   ) D>H IJ G :
   K : G 6<: ,A6H I>8(>B >I FH FH
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N 

  
    
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

38
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "  

                     
         
        
 & ' !     
'$(&
 A>: CI 7
,10,3 ' / ,0  .8.1452 .37 4 7-

,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *   
'$&&
 $ * D ,>A: 0: H I
,    //  // 
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :
&$.&

         
'  & '   ' 

&$,&
(%- 1 % (%) %0
&&
- >@ &&
. >@
0 G >6A * D . / 0 . / 0
* D D; ADL H . : FJ >G : 9 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 &$*&
* D D; ADL H
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A
&$(&
  3 : ><=I D; >H =
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A
   ) D>H IJ G : &$&&
FH FH '& '&&
,( /0 % (%) %0       ! 
&&
- >@ &&
. >@
>H = * D . / . /
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A   
    
  
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A
  3 : ><=I D; >H = &&
- K H *K E # G 6N : CH : ,DDG AN <G 69: 9 /6C9 L >I= />AI D;* D ,A6H I>8>IN
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A &&
. KE # G 6N B : 9>J B 9: CH : />AIN /6C9 D;* D ,A6H I>8>IN
   ) D>H IJ G :
   K : G 6<: ,A6H I>8(>B >I FH FH
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N 

  
    
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

39
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "  

                        
         
         
 & ' !     
'$(&
 A>: CI 7
,10,3 ' / ,0  .8.1452 .37 4 7-

,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *   
'$&&
 $ * D ,>A: 0: H I
,    //  // 
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :
&$.&

         
'  & '   ' 

&$,&
(%- 1 % (%) %0
&&
/ >@ &&
1 >@
0 G >6A * D . / 0 . / 0
* D D; ADL H . : FJ >G : 9 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 &$*&
* D D; ADL H
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A
&$(&
  3 : ><=I D; >H =
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A
   ) D>H IJ G : &$&&
FH FH '& '&&
,( /0 % (%) %0       ! 
&&
/ >@ &&
1 >@
>H = * D . / . /
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A   
    
  
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A
  3 : ><=I D; >H = &&
/ KH # G 6N B : 9>J B 9: CH : ,DDG AN <G 69: 9 /6C9 D;* D ,A6H I>8>IN
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A &&
1 KE # G 6N : CH : />AIN /6C9 D;* D ,A6H I>8>IN
   ) D>H IJ G :
   K : G 6<: ,A6H I>8(>B >I FH FH
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9
0 : H I: 9 7 N   =: 8@: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N 

  
    
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

40
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "  

                        
         
         
 & ' !     
+-$&&
 A>: CI 7
,10,3 ' / ,0  .8.1452 .37 4 7-

,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *    +,$+&

 $ * D ,>A: 0: H I
,    //   //  
+,$&&
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :

++$+&

         
'  & '   ' 

++$&&
(%- 1 % (%) %0
& &
)( -- & &
)) >@
0 G >6A * D . / 0 . / 0 +*$+&
* D D; ADL H . : FJ >G : 9 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2
* D D; ADL H 0/ /4 .5
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A 03+./ 02+-5 04+30 +*$&&
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A /6+.- /5+// /6+4/
  3 : ><=I D; >H = .2+61 .2+3/ .2+40 +)$+&
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G 4+-/ 3+53 4+6.
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A .0+.3 ./+3- .0+66
   ) D>H IJ G : 20+01 21+11 23+21 +)$&&
22 FH '& '&&
,( /0 % (%) %0       ! 
& &
)( +- & &
)) >@
>H = * D . / . /
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A 01+02 01+23   
    
  
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A /6+03 0-+-/
  3 : ><=I D; >H = .2+.2 .4+-. & &
)( KE # G 6N B : 9>J B 9: CH : />AIN /6C9 D;2 : G N $><= ,A6H I>8>IN
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G 1+66 1+21
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A .1+/. .0+-. & &
)) K H *K E # G 6N 2 : G N : CH : ,DDG AN <G 69: 9 /6C9 L >I= />AI D;* D ,A6H I>8>IN
   ) D>H IJ G : 02+./ 01+6-
   K : G 6<: ,A6H I>8(>B >I 02 FH
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N 

  
    
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

41
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "  

                        
         
         
 & ' !     
,)$&&
 A>: CI 7
,10,3 ' / ,0  .8.1452 .37 4 7-

,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *   
,($&&
 $ * D ,>A: 0: H I
,    //   6 //  
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :
,'$&&

         
'  & '   ' 

,&$&&
(%- 1 % (%) %0
& &
)+H .( & &
), >@
0 G >6A * D . / 0 . / 0
* D D; ADL H . : FJ >G : 9 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 +/$&&
* D D; ADL H 00 /5 .3
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A 04+3/ 03+66 03+23
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A /6+5- /6+.3 /5+66
+.$&&
  3 : ><=I D; >H = .3+// .2+6. .3+6/
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G 4+5/ 4+50 4+24
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A .0+25 .0+/2 ./+-4
   ) D>H IJ G : 24+25 26+-6 3/+4/ +-$&&
3- FH '& '&&
,( /0 % (%) %0       ! 
& &
)+H +0 & &
), >@
>H = * D . / . /
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A 00+30 01+0.   
    
  
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A /5+33 /6+20
  3 : ><=I D; >H = .2+41 .3+5. & &
)+H E@ # G 6N $6G 9 /6C9N ! A6H I>8/>AI D;2 : G N $><= ,A6H I>8>IN
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G 1+64 1+45
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A ./+6/ ./+4/ & &
), KH # G 6N 2 : G N : CH : ,DDG AN <G 69: 9 /6C9 D;* D ,A6H I>8>IN
   ) D>H IJ G : 05+14 04+25
   K : G 6<: ,A6H I>8(>B >I 05 FH
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N 

  
    
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

42
 ( " )  % &  '  & ' "    # %  ' # % +  "  " & $   ' # " "  

                        
         
         
 & ' !     
,&$&&
 A>: CI 7
,10,3 ' / ,0  .8.1452 .37 4 7-
++$&&
,G D?
: 8I * DG I= /DJ I=  DB B J I: G . 6>AL 6N ! M I: CH >DC ,G D?
: 8I  , *   
+&$&&
 $ * D ,>A: 0: H I
,    //  
*+$&&
/6B EA: 9 7 N  1 0 (%%. : EG : H : CI6I>K :
*&$&&

         
'  & '   '  )+$&&

)&$&&
(%- 1 % (%) %0
& &
). >@ &&
( ( (+$&&
0 G >6A * D . / 0 . / 0
* D D; ADL H . : FJ >G : 9 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 /2*02 /-*0- .2*/2 (&$&&
* D D; ADL H
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A
'+$&&
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A
'&$&&
  3 : ><=I D; >H =
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G +$&&
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A
   ) D>H IJ G : &$&&
'&       !  '&&
FH
,( /0 % (%) %0
& &
). >@ &&
( (
>H = * D . / . /
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  3 : I /D>A   
    
  
  3 : ><=I D; >H =  G N /D>A
  3 : ><=I D; >H = & &
). KE # G 6N 2 : G N : CH : />AIN /6C9 D;* D ,A6H I>8>IN
  3 : ><=I D;L 6I: G
  3 : ><=I D; GN /D>A &&
( #<AN ,-! #<AN ,-!
   ) D>H IJ G :
   K : G 6<: ,A6H I>8(>B >I FH
. ! )  . ' / 0 =>H G : EDG I >H I=: G : H J AI D;I: H I E: G ;DG B : 9 DC I=: H 6B EA: H H J 7 B >II: 9
0 : H I: 9 7 N   : G I>;>: 9 7 N 

  
    
(67  0 : 8=C>8>6C (67 DG 6IDG N ) 6C6<: G

43
            
                     
       
   
                       

6?<8AF 2 <,53,7 (2,3 /> /58 9 6 /7 <  8 ! <.

CDB=86F 2 # 8 :<2 '8 = <2  8 6 6 = </: & ,35? ,A  @ </7 ; 38 7 % :8 4/-<  % #  

) $ ' #  2   % :
' 571 *1=>'   
EBGD68 2 C OXK
) $ ' #   , 2      &  % &  ' # ( (*

'( #   &  ( '( "  ( $   $ & ' %      &  *(+ $  ' $ !

 )*$    

'8 35% ,; ; 37 1 # 8  '3/> / '' '' 

) ' '  5,; ; 303-,<38 7 CA CA
4K U XN 0     6     6
% A -7 8 6 /</: # 8 ( )
Z3 *18 ;1<->?<1 > *.&+ *.&+
$ ;A  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< -90 A->1< ->>1=>>18 ;1<->?<1 3 .-1&-+ ./,&(-
> *18 ;1<->?<1 >  13<11  17/5?= *,&+ *,&+
$ = $ -== : 2 >41 : @190<B)-8 ;71= 3 /1&-. ./&.1
$ ;A=  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< A->1< -90 =: 57=-8 ;71= ->>18 ;1<->?<1 > 3 /(1&), /).&)+
"  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 > (&111(* (&110-(
 > );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 > *&.-/ *&.,,
9  / 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?= *&.-, *&.,(
9  -@1   @1<-31 );1/525/  <-@5>B

'8 35& /<,37 /. # 8  '3/> / '' '' 

> *18 ;1<->?<1 >
$ - $ -== & @19 0<510 =-8 ;71 3
$ A $ -== 59A->1< 3
$ ==0  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
"  );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
9> 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?=
9  /3

B 5> 1B < C  *45= <1;: <>5= >41 <1=?7>: 2 >1=>;1<2: <8 10 : 9>41 =-8 ;71 =?.8 5>>10

FMY ZML J^ 2  41/610 J^ 2  1<>52510

&   /5,  := B
#-.: <->: <B)?;1<@5=: < #-.: <->: <B$ -9-31<

44
            
                     
       
   
                       

6?<8AF 2 <,53,7 (2,3 /> /58 9 6 /7 <  8 ! <.

CDB=86F 2 # 8 :<2 '8 = <2  8 6 6 = </: & ,35? ,A  @ </7 ; 38 7 % :8 4/-<  % #  

) $ ' #  2   % :
' 571 *1=>'   
EBGD68 2 C OXK
) $ ' #   , 2      &  % &  ' # ( (*

'( #   &  ( '( "  ( $   $ & ' %      &  *(+ $  ' $ !

 )*$    

'8 35% ,; ; 37 1 # 8  '3/> / ''  '' 

) ' '  5,; ; 303-,<38 7 C A $C > C>
4K U XN 0     6     6
% A -7 8 6 /</: # 8 ( )
Z3 *18 ;1<->?<1 > *.&+ *.&+
$ ;A  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< -90 A->1< ->>1=>>18 ;1<->?<1 3 .-1&-+ ./,&(-
> *18 ;1<->?<1 >  13<11  17/5?= *-&* *,&+
$ = $ -== : 2 >41 : @190<B)-8 ;71= 3 /-&)* .+&1/
$ ;A=  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< A->1< -90 =: 57=-8 ;71= ->>18 ;1<->?<1 > 3 /(.&+. /)+&1.
"  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 > (&110/1 (&110-(
 > );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 > *&.-- *&..(
9  / 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?= *&.-* *&.-.
9  -@1   @1<-31 );1/525/  <-@5>B

'8 35& /<,37 /. # 8  '3/> / ''  '' 

> *18 ;1<->?<1 >
$ - $ -== & @19 0<510 =-8 ;71 3
$ A $ -== 59A->1< 3
$ ==0  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
"  );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
9> 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?=
9  /3

B 5> 1B < C  *45= <1;: <>5= >41 <1=?7>: 2 >1=>;1<2: <8 10 : 9>41 =-8 ;71 =?.8 5>>10

FMY ZML J^ 2  41/610 J^ 2  1<>52510

&   /5,  := B
#-.: <->: <B)?;1<@5=: < #-.: <->: <B$ -9-31<

45
            
                     
       
   
                       

6?<8AF 2 <,53,7 (2,3 /> /58 9 6 /7 <  8 ! <.

CDB=86F 2 # 8 :<2 '8 = <2  8 6 6 = </: & ,35? ,A  @ </7 ; 38 7 % :8 4/-<  % #  

) $ ' #  2   % :
' 571 *1=>'   
EBGD68 2 C OXK
) $ ' #   , 2      &  % &  ' # ( (*

'( #   &  ( '( "  ( $   $ & ' %      &  *(+ $  ' $ !

 )*$    

'8 35% ,; ; 37 1 # 8  '3/> / ''  '' 

) ' '  5,; ; 303-,<38 7 CA C>
4K U XN 0      6      6
% A -7 8 6 /</: # 8 ) *
Z3 *18 ;1<->?<1 > *.&+ *.&+
$ ;A  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< -90 A->1< ->>1=>>18 ;1<->?<1 3 ./,&(- .-/&/.
> *18 ;1<->?<1 >  13<11  17/5?= *-&+ *-&*
$ = $ -== : 2 >41 : @190<B)-8 ;71= 3 .*&(1 /(&),
$ ;A=  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< A->1< -90 =: 57=-8 ;71= ->>18 ;1<->?<1 > 3 /)+&(* /()&/1
"  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 > (&110/. (&110-(
 > );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 > *&.0. *&.0.
9  / 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?= *&.0+ *&.0*
9  -@1   @1<-31 );1/525/  <-@5>B

'8 35& /<,37 /. # 8  '3/> / ''  '' 

> *18 ;1<->?<1 >
$ - $ -== & @19 0<510 =-8 ;71 3
$ A $ -== 59A->1< 3
$ ==0  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
"  );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
9> 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?=
9  /3

B 5> 1B < C  *45= <1;: <>5= >41 <1=?7>: 2 >1=>;1<2: <8 10 : 9>41 =-8 ;71 =?.8 5>>10

FMY ZML J^ 2  41/610 J^ 2  1<>52510

&   /5,  := B
#-.: <->: <B)?;1<@5=: < #-.: <->: <B$ -9-31<

46
            
                     
       
   
                       

6?<8AF 2 <,53,7 (2,3 /> /58 9 6 /7 <  8 ! <.

CDB=86F 2 # 8 :<2 '8 = <2  8 6 6 = </: & ,35? ,A  @ </7 ; 38 7 % :8 4/-<  % #  

) $ ' #  2   % :
' 571 *1=>'   
EBGD68 2 C OXK
) $ ' #   , 2      &  % &  ' # ( (*

'( #   &  ( '( "  ( $   $ & ' %      &  *(+ $  ' $ !

 )*$    

'8 35% ,; ; 37 1 # 8  '3/> / ''   ''  

) ' '  5,; ; 303-,<38 7 C> C A $C >
4K U XN 0       6       6
% A -7 8 6 /</: # 8 * (
Z3 *18 ;1<->?<1 > *.&+ *.&+
$ ;A  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< -90 A->1< ->>1=>>18 ;1<->?<1 3 .-/&/. .-1&-+
> *18 ;1<->?<1 >  13<11  17/5?= *,&* *-&+
$ = $ -== : 2 >41 : @190<B)-8 ;71= 3 /+&+, /1&/1
$ ;A=  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< A->1< -90 =: 57=-8 ;71= ->>18 ;1<->?<1 > 3 /(,&-( /(1&.(
"  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 > (&111(, (&110-(
 > );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 > *&/-0 *&.0-
9  / 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?= *&/-- *&.0)
9  -@1   @1<-31 );1/525/  <-@5>B

'8 35& /<,37 /. # 8  '3/> / ''   ''  

> *18 ;1<->?<1 >
$ - $ -== & @19 0<510 =-8 ;71 3
$ A $ -== 59A->1< 3
$ ==0  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
"  );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
9> 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?=
9  /3

B 5> 1B < C  *45= <1;: <>5= >41 <1=?7>: 2 >1=>;1<2: <8 10 : 9>41 =-8 ;71 =?.8 5>>10

FMY ZML J^ 2  41/610 J^ 2

&   /5,  := B
#-.: <->: <B)?;1<@5=: < #-.: <->: <B$ -9-31<

47
            
                     
       
   
                       

6?<8AF 2 <,53,7 (2,3 /> /58 9 6 /7 <  8 ! <.

CDB=86F 2 # 8 :<2 '8 = <2  8 6 6 = </: & ,35? ,A  @ </7 ; 38 7 % :8 4/-<  % #  

) $ ' #  2   % :
' 571 *1=>'   
EBGD68 2 C OXK
) $ ' #   , 2      &  % &  ' # ( (*

'( #   &  ( '( "  ( $   $ & ' %      &  *(+ $  ' $ !

 )*$    

'8 35% ,; ; 37 1 # 8  '3/> / ''   , ''  

) ' '  5,; ; 303-,<38 7 >8 CA
4K U XN 0       6      6
% A -7 8 6 /</: # 8 ) *
Z3 *18 ;1<->?<1 > *.&+ *.&+
$ ;A  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< -90 A->1< ->>1=>>18 ;1<->?<1 3 ./,&(- .-/&/.
> *18 ;1<->?<1 >  13<11  17/5?= *-&+ *,&*
$ = $ -== : 2 >41 : @190<B)-8 ;71= 3 .)&-) .)&+(
$ ;A=  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< A->1< -90 =: 57=-8 ;71= ->>18 ;1<->?<1 > 3 /)+&-+ .1.&-*
"  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 > (&110/. (&110-(
 > );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 > *&/1* *&/*(
9  / 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?= *&/01 *&/).
9  -@1   @1<-31 );1/525/  <-@5>B

'8 35& /<,37 /. # 8  '3/> / ''   , ''  

> *18 ;1<->?<1 >
$ - $ -== & @19 0<510 =-8 ;71 3
$ A $ -== 59A->1< 3
$ ==0  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
"  );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
9> 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?=
9  /3

B 5> 1B < C  *45= <1;: <>5= >41 <1=?7>: 2 >1=>;1<2: <8 10 : 9>41 =-8 ;71 =?.8 5>>10

FMY ZML J^ 2  41/610 J^ 2

&   /5,  := B
#-.: <->: <B)?;1<@5=: < #-.: <->: <B$ -9-31<

48
            
                     
       
   
                       

6?<8AF 2 <,53,7 (2,3 /> /58 9 6 /7 <  8 ! <.

CDB=86F 2 # 8 :<2 '8 = <2  8 6 6 = </: & ,35? ,A  @ </7 ; 38 7 % :8 4/-<  % #  

) $ ' #  2   % :
' 571 *1=>'   
EBGD68 2 C OXK
) $ ' #   , 2      &  % &  ' # ( (*

'( #   &  ( '( "  ( $   $ & ' %      &  *(+ $  ' $ !

 )*$    

'8 35% ,; ; 37 1 # 8  '3/> / ''   ''

) ' '  5,; ; 303-,<38 7 C> '
4K U XN 0    6 #? &1
% A -7 8 6 /</: # 8 * '
Z3 *18 ;1<->?<1 > *.&+ *.&+
$ ;A  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< -90 A->1< ->>1=>>18 ;1<->?<1 3 .-/&/. .-/&/.
> *18 ;1<->?<1 >  13<11  17/5?= *,&) *,&+
$ = $ -== : 2 >41 : @190<B)-8 ;71= 3 /(&+- /+&*.
$ ;A=  $ -== : 2 ' B/9: 8 1>1< A->1< -90 =: 57=-8 ;71= ->>18 ;1<->?<1 > 3 /(*&)* #A'4
"  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 > (&111(/ (&110-(
 > );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 > *&/(0 #A'4
9  / 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?= *&/(- #A'4
9  -@1   @1<-31 );1/525/  <-@5>B

'8 35& /<,37 /. # 8  '3/> / ''   ''

> *18 ;1<->?<1 >
$ - $ -== & @19 0<510 =-8 ;71 3
$ A $ -== 59A->1< 3
$ ==0  *18 ;1<->?<1  : 1225/519>->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
"  );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1 >
9> 3 );1/525/ 3<-@5>B: 2 =: 57->>18 ;1<->?<1   013
 17/5?=
9  /3

B 5> 1B < C  *45= <1;: <>5= >41 <1=?7>: 2 >1=>;1<2: <8 10 : 9>41 =-8 ;71 =?.8 5>>10

FMY ZML J^ 2  41/610 J^ 2

&   /5,  := B
#-.: <->: <B)?;1<@5=: < #-.: <->: <B$ -9-31<

49
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

APPENDIX E
SITE PHOTOS
APPENDIX

50
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : Toolbox meeting before start Description : Boring on progress at P877
work

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : SPT sample S1 Description : SPT sample S2
at depth 1.50 m. at depth 3.00 m.

51
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : SPT sample S3 Description : SPT sample S4
at depth 4.50 m. at depth 6.00 m.

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : SPT sample S5 Description : SPT sample S6
at depth 7.50 m. at depth 9.00 m.

52
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : SPT sample S7 Description : SPT sample S8
at depth 10.50 m. at depth 12.00 m.

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : SPT sample S9 Description : SPT sample S10
at depth 13.50 m. at depth 15.0 m.

53
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : SPT sample S11 Description : SPT sample S12
at depth 16.50 m. at depth 18.0 m.

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : SPT sample S13 Description : SPT sample S13A
at depth 19.50 m. at depth 19.95 m.

54
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : SPT sample S14 Description : SPT sample S15
at depth 21.0 m. at depth 22.5 m.

Location : San Fernando Station Location : San Fernando Station

Description : SPT sample S16 Description : SPT sample S17
at depth 24.0 m. at depth 25.5 m.

55
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works

Location : San Fernando Station

Description : Water collection for chemical
test

56
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works
Location : San Fernando Station
Description : Field Boring Log
57
 North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03

APPENDIX F
LIQUEFACTION CALCULATION
APPENDIX

58
 SPT BASED LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT
Project title : North South Commuter Railway Extension Project CP N-03 SPT Name: BH-PILE TEST
Location : (Pier - 877) San Fernando City, Pampanga
:: Input parameters and analysis properties ::
Analysis method: Boulanger & Idriss, 2014 G.W.T. (in-situ): 4.85 m
Fines correction method: Boulanger & Idriss, 2014 G.W.T. (earthq.): 4.85 m
Sampling method: Standard Sampler Earthquake magnitude Mw: 7.50
Borehole diameter: 65mm to 115mm Peak ground acceleration: 0.30 g
Rod length: 1.00 m Eq. external load: 0.00 kPa
Hammer energy ratio: 1.00

Raw
Raw
SPTSPT
Data
Data CSR
CSR
- CRR
- CRR
Plot
Plot FS FS
Plot
Plot LPILPI
2 2 2
2
3 3 3 3

4 4 4 4

5 5 During earthq. 5 During earthq. 5 During earthq.

Insitu
6 6 6 6

7 7 7 7
8 8 8 8
9 9 9 9
10 10 10 10
11 11 11 11
Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)
12 12 12 12
13 13 13 13
14 14 14 14
15 15 15 15
16 16 16 16
17 17 17 17
18 18 18 18
19 19 19 19
20 20 20 20
21 21 21 21
22 22 22 22
23 23 23 23
24 24 24 24
25
25 25 25

0 10 20 30 40 50 0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 1 0 0 .5 1 1 .5 2 0 5 10
SPT C ount (blows/30cm) C SR - C RR Factor of Safety Liquefaction potential

CRRCRR
7.507.50
clean
clean
sand
sand
curve
curve
1 .0 F.S. color scheme
Liquefaction Almost certain it will liquefy
0 .9 Very likely to liquefy
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Unlike to liquefy
0 .8
Almost certain it will not liquefy

0 .7
Cyclic Stress Ratio*

LPI color scheme

0 .6 Very high risk
High risk
Low risk
0 .5

0 .4

0 .3

0 .2

0 .1
No Liquefaction
0 .0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C orrected Blow C ount N1(60),cs

LiqSVs 2.2.1.8 - SPT & Vs Liquefaction Assessment Software Page: 1

Project File: 59
This software is registered to: dbadsuara engineering consultancy

:: Overall Liquefaction Assessment Analysis Plots ::

Raw
Raw
SPTSPT
Data
Data CSR
CSR
- CRR
- CRR
Plot
Plot FS FS
Plot
Plot Vertical
Vertical
Liq.Liq.
Settlements
Settlements Lateral
Lateral
Liq.Liq.
Displacements
Displacements

2 2 2 2
2
3 3 3 3
3
4 4 4 4
4
5 During earthq. 5 During earthq. 5 During earthq. 5 During earthq.
5 Insitu

6 6 6 6 6

7 7 7 7 7

8 8 8 8 8

9 9 9 9 9

10 10 10 10 10

11 11 11 11 11

12 12 12 12 12
Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)
13 13 13 13 13

14 14 14 14 14

15 15 15 15 15

16 16 16 16 16

17 17 17 17 17

18 18 18 18 18

19 19 19 19 19
20 20 20 20 20

21 21 21 21 21
22
22 22 22 22
23
23 23 23 23
24
24 24 24 24
25
25 25 25 25

0 10 20 30 40 50 0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 1 0 0 .5 1 1 .5 2 0 2 4 6 0
SPT C ount (blows/30cm) C SR - C RR Factor of Safety C uml. Settlement (cm) C uml. Displacement (m)

LiqSVs 2.2.1.8 - SPT & Vs Liquefaction Assessment Software Page: 2

Project File:
60
This software is registered to: dbadsuara engineering consultancy

:: Field input data ::

Test SPT Field Fines Unit Infl. Can

Depth Value Content Weight Thickness Liquefy
(m) (blows) (%) (kN/m³) (m)

1.50 7 5.00 16.00 1.50 Yes

3.00 32 5.00 20.00 1.50 Yes
4.50 27 3.00 19.00 1.50 Yes
6.00 30 6.00 20.00 1.50 Yes
7.50 32 6.00 21.00 1.50 Yes
9.00 27 26.00 20.00 1.50 Yes
10.50 24 3.00 20.00 1.50 Yes
12.00 29 17.00 20.00 1.50 Yes
13.50 37 17.00 21.00 1.50 Yes
15.00 23 42.00 20.00 1.50 Yes
16.50 58 9.00 22.00 1.50 Yes
18.00 59 51.00 22.00 1.50 Yes
19.50 65 51.00 22.00 1.50 Yes
19.95 101 51.00 22.00 0.45 Yes
21.00 155 5.00 22.00 1.05 Yes
22.50 102 19.00 22.00 1.50 Yes
24.00 92 19.00 22.00 1.50 Yes
25.50 93 19.00 22.00 1.50 Yes

Abbreviations
Depth: Depth at which test was performed (m)
SPT Field Value: Number of blows per 30 cm
Fines Content: Fines content at test depth (%)
Unit Weight: Unit weight at test depth (kN/m³)
Infl. Thickness: Thickness of the soil layer to be considered in settlements analysis (m)
Can Liquefy: User defined switch for excluding/including test depth from the analysis procedure

:: Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) calculation data ::

Depth SPT Unit σv uo σ'vo m CN CE CB CR CS (N1 )60 FC Δ(Ν1 )60 (N1 )60cs CRR7.5
(m) Field Weight (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (%)
Value (kN/m³)

1.50 7 16.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 0.55 1.70 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 9 5.00 0.00 9 4.000
3.00 32 20.00 54.00 0.00 54.00 0.35 1.25 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 32 5.00 0.00 32 4.000
4.50 27 19.00 82.50 0.00 82.50 0.40 1.08 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 25 3.00 0.00 25 4.000
6.00 30 20.00 112.50 11.28 101.22 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 28 6.00 0.03 28 0.384
7.50 32 21.00 144.00 26.00 118.00 0.37 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 29 6.00 0.03 29 0.429
9.00 27 20.00 174.00 40.71 133.29 0.38 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 23 26.00 5.15 28 0.384
10.50 24 20.00 204.00 55.43 148.57 0.44 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 3.00 0.00 20 0.206
12.00 29 20.00 234.00 70.14 163.86 0.38 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 17.00 3.85 28 0.384
13.50 37 21.00 265.50 84.86 180.64 0.34 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 17.00 3.85 34 4.000
15.00 23 20.00 295.50 99.57 195.93 0.43 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 42.00 5.59 23 0.249
16.50 58 22.00 328.50 114.29 214.21 0.26 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 48 9.00 0.72 49 4.000
18.00 59 22.00 361.50 129.00 232.50 0.26 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 47 51.00 5.61 53 4.000
19.50 65 22.00 394.50 143.72 250.78 0.26 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 51 51.00 5.61 57 4.000
19.95 101 22.00 404.40 148.13 256.27 0.26 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 79 51.00 5.61 85 4.000
21.00 155 22.00 427.50 158.43 269.07 0.26 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 120 5.00 0.00 120 4.000
22.50 102 22.00 460.50 173.15 287.35 0.26 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 77 19.00 4.30 81 4.000
24.00 92 22.00 493.50 187.86 305.64 0.26 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 69 19.00 4.30 73 4.000
25.50 93 22.00 526.50 202.58 323.92 0.26 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 68 19.00 4.30 72 4.000

LiqSVs 2.2.1.8 - SPT & Vs Liquefaction Assessment Software Page: 3

Project File: 61
This software is registered to: dbadsuara engineering consultancy

:: Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) calculation data ::

Depth SPT Unit σv uo σ'vo m CN CE CB CR CS (N1 )60 FC Δ(Ν1 )60 (N1 )60cs CRR7.5
(m) Field Weight (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (%)
Value (kN/m³)

Abbreviations
σv : Total stress during SPT test (kPa)
uo: Water pore pressure during SPT test (kPa)
σ'vo: Effective overburden pressure during SPT test (kPa)
m: Stress exponent normalization factor
CN : Overburden corretion factor
CE: Energy correction factor
CB: Borehole diameter correction factor
CR: Rod length correction factor
CS: Liner correction factor
N1(60): Corrected NSPT to a 60% energy ratio
Δ(Ν1 )60 Equivalent clean sand adjustment
N1(60) cs : Corected N1(60) value for fines content
CRR7.5 : Cyclic resistance ratio for M=7.5

:: Cyclic Stress Ratio calculation (CSR fully adjusted and normalized) ::

Depth Unit σv,eq uo,eq σ'vo,eq rd α CSR MSFmax (N1 )60cs MSF CSReq,M=7.5 Ksigma CSR* FS
(m) Weight (kPa) (kPa) (kPa)
(kN/m³)

1.50 16.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 1.00 1.00 0.194 1.17 9 1.00 0.194 1.10 0.706 2.000
3.00 20.00 54.00 0.00 54.00 0.98 1.00 0.191 2.12 32 1.00 0.191 1.10 0.696 2.000
4.50 19.00 82.50 0.00 82.50 0.97 1.00 0.188 1.72 25 1.00 0.188 1.03 0.729 2.000
6.00 20.00 112.50 11.28 101.22 0.95 1.00 0.206 1.88 28 1.00 0.206 1.00 0.823 0.933
7.50 21.00 144.00 26.00 118.00 0.93 1.00 0.221 1.94 29 1.00 0.221 0.97 0.912 0.940
9.00 20.00 174.00 40.71 133.29 0.91 1.00 0.232 1.88 28 1.00 0.232 0.95 0.976 0.786
10.50 20.00 204.00 55.43 148.57 0.89 1.00 0.238 1.49 20 1.00 0.238 0.95 1.003 0.410
12.00 20.00 234.00 70.14 163.86 0.87 1.00 0.241 1.88 28 1.00 0.241 0.91 1.060 0.724
13.50 21.00 265.50 84.86 180.64 0.84 1.00 0.242 2.20 34 1.00 0.242 0.86 1.131 2.000
15.00 20.00 295.50 99.57 195.93 0.82 1.00 0.242 1.62 23 1.00 0.242 0.90 1.074 0.465
16.50 22.00 328.50 114.29 214.21 0.80 1.00 0.239 2.20 49 1.00 0.239 0.78 1.229 2.000
18.00 22.00 361.50 129.00 232.50 0.78 1.00 0.236 2.20 53 1.00 0.236 0.75 1.250 2.000
19.50 22.00 394.50 143.72 250.78 0.76 1.00 0.232 2.20 57 1.00 0.232 0.73 1.268 2.000
19.95 22.00 404.40 148.13 256.27 0.75 1.00 0.231 2.20 85 1.00 0.231 0.73 1.273 2.000
21.00 22.00 427.50 158.43 269.07 0.74 1.00 0.228 2.20 120 1.00 0.228 0.71 1.283 2.000
22.50 22.00 460.50 173.15 287.35 0.72 1.00 0.224 2.20 81 1.00 0.224 0.69 1.295 2.000
24.00 22.00 493.50 187.86 305.64 0.70 1.00 0.220 2.20 73 1.00 0.220 0.67 1.306 2.000
25.50 22.00 526.50 202.58 323.92 0.68 1.00 0.216 2.20 72 1.00 0.216 0.66 1.317 2.000

Abbreviations
σv,eq: Total overburden pressure at test point, during earthquake (kPa)
uo,eq: Water pressure at test point, during earthquake (kPa)
σ'vo,eq: Effective overburden pressure, during earthquake (kPa)
rd: Nonlinear shear mass factor
α: Improvement factor due to stone columns
CSR : Cyclic Stress Ratio
MSF : Magnitude Scaling Factor
CSReq,M=7.5 : CSR adjusted for M=7.5
Ksigma: Effective overburden stress factor
CSR* : CSR fully adjusted (user FS applied)***
FS: Calculated factor of safety against soil liquefaction
***
User FS: 2.00

LiqSVs 2.2.1.8 - SPT & Vs Liquefaction Assessment Software Page: 4

Project File: 62
This software is registered to: dbadsuara engineering consultancy

:: Liquefaction potential according to Iwasaki ::

Depth FS F wz Thickness IL
(m) (m)

1.50 2.000 0.00 9.25 1.50 0.00

3.00 2.000 0.00 8.50 1.50 0.00
4.50 2.000 0.00 7.75 1.50 0.00
6.00 0.933 0.07 7.00 1.50 0.71
7.50 0.940 0.06 6.25 1.50 0.56
9.00 0.786 0.21 5.50 1.50 1.77
10.50 0.410 0.59 4.75 1.50 4.20
12.00 0.724 0.28 4.00 1.50 1.66
13.50 2.000 0.00 3.25 1.50 0.00
15.00 0.465 0.54 2.50 1.50 2.01
16.50 2.000 0.00 1.75 1.50 0.00
18.00 2.000 0.00 1.00 1.50 0.00
19.50 2.000 0.00 0.25 1.50 0.00
19.95 2.000 0.00 0.03 0.45 0.00
21.00 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
22.50 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
24.00 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
25.50 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Overall potential IL : 10.90

IL = 0.00 - No liquefaction
IL between 0.00 and 5 - Liquefaction not probable
IL between 5 and 15 - Liquefaction probable
IL > 15 - Liquefaction certain

:: Vertical settlements estimation for dry sands ::

Depth (N1 )60 τav p Gmax α b γ ε15 Nc εNc εNc Δh ΔS

(m) (MPa) wei ght (%) (m) (cm)
factor

1.50 9 4.66 16.08 36.45 0.13 18668.90 0.00 0.00 15.16 0.94 0.07 1.50 0.215
3.00 32 10.34 36.18 83.45 0.14 11476.50 0.00 0.00 15.16 0.88 0.01 1.50 0.029
4.50 25 15.55 55.28 95.00 0.15 8899.66 0.00 0.00 15.16 0.82 0.02 1.50 0.054

Cumulative settlemetns: 0.298

Abbreviations
τav: Average cyclic shear stress
p: Average stress
Gmax: Maximum shear modulus (MPa)
α, b: Shear strain formula variables
γ: Average shear strain
ε15 : Volumetric strain after 15 cycles
Nc : Number of cycles
εNc: Volumetric strain for number of cycles Nc (%)
Δh: Thickness of soil layer (cm)
ΔS: Settlement of soil layer (cm)

:: Vertical & Lateral displ.acements estimation for saturated sands ::

Depth (N1 )60cs γlim Fα FSliq γmax ev ev dz Sv-1D LDI

(m) (%) (%) wei ght (%) (m) (cm) (m)
factor

6.00 28 6.08 0.04 0.933 4.02 0.76 0.65 1.50 0.981 0.00
7.50 29 5.33 -0.02 0.940 3.94 0.71 0.57 1.50 0.858 0.00

LiqSVs 2.2.1.8 - SPT & Vs Liquefaction Assessment Software Page: 5

Project File: 63
This software is registered to: dbadsuara engineering consultancy

:: Vertical & Lateral displ.acements estimation for saturated sands ::

Depth (N1 )60cs γlim Fα FSliq γmax ev ev dz Sv-1D LDI

(m) (%) (%) wei ght (%) (m) (cm) (m)
factor

9.00 28 6.08 0.04 0.786 5.47 0.65 0.75 1.50 1.131 0.00
10.50 20 15.90 0.52 0.410 15.90 0.59 1.36 1.50 2.033 0.00
12.00 28 6.08 0.04 0.724 6.08 0.53 0.69 1.50 1.028 0.00
13.50 34 2.58 -0.36 2.000 0.00 0.47 0.00 1.50 0.000 0.00
15.00 23 11.27 0.35 0.465 11.27 0.41 0.84 1.50 1.263 0.00
16.50 49 0.06 -1.51 2.000 0.00 0.35 0.00 1.50 0.000 0.00
18.00 53 0.00 -1.83 2.000 0.00 0.29 0.00 1.50 0.000 0.00
19.50 57 0.00 -2.17 2.000 0.00 0.24 0.00 1.50 0.000 0.00
19.95 85 0.00 -4.66 2.000 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.45 0.000 0.00
21.00 120 0.00 -8.01 2.000 0.00 0.18 0.00 1.05 0.000 0.00
22.50 81 0.00 -4.29 2.000 0.00 0.12 0.00 1.50 0.000 0.00
24.00 73 0.00 -3.56 2.000 0.00 0.06 0.00 1.50 0.000 0.00
25.50 72 0.00 -3.47 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.000 0.00

Cumulative settlements: 7.294 0.00

Abbreviations
γlim: Limiting shear strain (%)
Fα/N: Maximun shear strain factor
γmax: Maximum shear strain (%)
ev:: Post liquefaction volumetric strain (%)
Sv-1D: Estimated vertical settlement (cm)
LDI: Estimated lateral displacement (m)

LiqSVs 2.2.1.8 - SPT & Vs Liquefaction Assessment Software Page: 6

Project File: 64
 References

⦁ Ronald D. Andrus, Hossein Hayati, Nisha P. Mohanan, 2009. Correcting Liquefaction Resistance for Aged Sands Using Measured
to Estimated Velocity Ratio, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 135, No. 6, June 1

⦁ Boulanger, R.W. and Idriss, I. M., 2014. CPT AND SPT BASED LIQUEFACTION TRIGGERING PROCEDURES. DEPARTMENT OF
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS

⦁ Dipl.-Ing. Heinz J. Priebe, Vibro Replacement to Prevent Earthquake Induced Liquefaction, Proceedings of the Geotechnique-
Colloquium at Darmstadt, Germany, on March 19th, 1998 (also published in Ground Engineering, September 1998), Technical
paper 12-57E

⦁ Robertson, P.K. and Cabal, K.L., 2007, Guide to Cone Penetration Testing for Geotechnical Engineering. Available at no cost at
http://www.geologismiki.gr/

⦁ Youd, T.L., Idriss, I.M., Andrus, R.D., Arango, I., Castro, G., Christian, J.T., Dobry, R., Finn, W.D.L., Harder, L.F., Hynes, M.E.,
Ishihara, K., Koester, J., Liao, S., Marcuson III, W.F., Martin, G.R., Mitchell, J.K., Moriwaki, Y., Power, M.S., Robertson, P.K.,
Seed, R., and Stokoe, K.H., Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF
Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering,
Vol. 127, October, pp 817-833

⦁ Zhang, G., Robertson. P.K., Brachman, R., 2002, Estimating Liquefaction Induced Ground Settlements from the CPT, Canadian
Geotechnical Journal, 39: pp 1168-1180

⦁ Zhang, G., Robertson. P.K., Brachman, R., 2004, Estimating Liquefaction Induced Lateral Displacements using the SPT and CPT,
ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 8, 861-871

⦁ Pradel, D., 1998, Procedure to Evaluate Earthquake-Induced Settlements in Dry Sandy Soils, ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical &
Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 4, 364-368

⦁ R. Kayen, R. E. S. Moss, E. M. Thompson, R. B. Seed, K. O. Cetin, A. Der Kiureghian, Y. Tanaka, K. Tokimatsu, 2013. Shear-
Wave Velocity–Based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential, Journal of Geotechnical
and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 3, March 1

LiqSVs 2.2.1.8 - SPT & Vs Liquefaction Assessment Software 65

Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works
Soil investigation report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

APPENDIX 2

Test Report on Water

Document No. Revision Page No.

NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-ZWD-ST-000088 No. 0 Date: August 19, 2021 66
67
68
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works
Soil investigation report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

APPENDIX 3

Test Report on Soil Chemical Test

Document No. Revision Page No.

NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-ZWD-ST-000088 No. 0 Date: August 19, 2021 69
70
71
72
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works
Soil investigation report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

APPENDIX 4

Borehole Sketch

Document No. Revision Page No.

NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-ZWD-ST-000088 No. 0 Date: August 19, 2021 73
74
Italian - Thai Development Public Company Limited North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
Packages No. CP N-03
Civil Works
Soil investigation report – BH-Pile Test (P-877)

APPENDIX 5

Survey Report

Document No. Revision Page No.

NSCR-ITD-N03-ZWD-ZWD-ST-000088 No. 0 Date: August 19, 2021 75
76