Absalom and Achitophel-Zimri
Absalom and Achitophel-Zimri
Lines 529-568
Absalom and Achitophel published anonymously (without the name of the author) in 1681, is one of the
finest English political satires. It was intended by Dryden to rouse popular feeling against Shaftesbury and
to secure his accusation. Dryden’s political satire Absalom and Achitophel reflects upon politics in
England during the era of the Popish Plot (conspiracy against the king), when the Whig Party, under the
leadership of Shaftesbury, sought to prevent the legitimate succession of James II, because he is a
Catholic. The Whigs supported a parliamentary bill (The Exclusion Bill sought to exclude the King's
brother and heir James from the throne because he was Catholic,) that would have placed the
illegitimate son of Charles II, Duke of Monmouth, on the throne.
Dryden employs the biblical revolt against David by his son Absalom as a parallel story to satirize the
Whigs and their leaders. The power of the poem essentially lies in the mechanism of Biblical allegory.
Each character is given a Biblical name.
Duke of Monmouth, the illegitimate son of Charles II is given the biblical name of (Absalom); Absalom is
the illegitimate son of David, king of Israel, and a poetic representation of the duke of Monmouth, the
illegitimate son of Charles II, king of England. The dissident Jews (Whigs) seek to make him heir to his
father’s throne.
Duke of Shaftesbury, the false tempter is given the biblical name (Achitophel); Achitophel is the chief of
the rebellious Jews (Whigs) and a poetic representation of the Duke of Shaftesbury, who attempts to
persuade Absalom (the duke of Monmouth) to seize his father’s throne.
Duke of Buckingham, is given the biblical name of (Zimri); Zimri is the unfaithful servant and a poetic
representation of Duke Buckingham.
Charles II is given the biblical name of (David). David, the king of Israel, a poetic representation of Charles
II, king of England. Many dissatisfied Jews (Whigs) wish to rebel against him and secure the succession of
his illegitimate son, Absalom (the duke of Monmouth), to the throne.
Analysis:
A numerous host of dreaming saints succeed,
Of the true old enthusiastic breed; [530]
1
Poetry
Third Year- Second lecture
By: Hayder Gebreen
Dryden satirizes the members of Whig party who are dreaming saints and succeed in in a forming a
political party and they are from the upper class of the society (lords).
The Whigs employ their political and financial power against the king and his heir. They don't want to
build their country and they want to destroy it by civil war.
There are many politicians of such type who are like the herd of animals "who think too little and talk too
much."
These politicians who are like animals, they follow their instincts, and they don't know why they love
their fathers' religious sect (protestant)and their wealth.
The poet uses the biblical allusions of the stories of Satan who disobeyed God and of the Jubuite (who
were a Canaanite tribe who built and inhabited Jerusalem prior to its conquest by King David), who did
not accept the rule of king David, to exemplify the Whigs who disobeyed King Charles II.
2
Poetry
Third Year- Second lecture
By: Hayder Gebreen
The way that they were thinking in was not right because they were blind by hatred towards the catholic
heir.
Dryden describes the leaders of the Whigs (Duke of Shaftesbury, Duke of Monmouth, Duke of
Buckingham), as the heads of a snake (Hydra). These heads are not only the leaders but they are the
whole Whig party.
Some of these conspirators (traitors) were Lords of England. In the first rank (place) of these
conspirators, is Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) who betrayed his the king although he was a close friend of
him but because the king chose his catholic brother as an heir, Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) stands against
his king.
Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) is described as a man who has various talents and seemed to be as the best
of mankind.
3
Poetry
Third Year- Second lecture
By: Hayder Gebreen
Dryden states that Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) is "stiff in opinions, always in the wrong," as he always
chooses the wrong side and in the beginning of conspiracy, he was one of the leaders but he didn't
continue as such.
Dryden gives a satirical portrayal of the Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) as in a course of one month, he was a
chemist, fiddler (either flirt or violinist), a political person and clown.
Dryden hints at Buckingham's womanizing and carousing ways of life in which he spends his time and
money on women, arts, parties and freaks to entertain him.
Dryden paints a portrait of a man who is unstable, untrustworthy and aimless. Zimri (Duke of
Buckingham) was well known for these traits; he was also immoral, foolish and reckless.
Criticizing and praising were Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) his usual subjects and in both cases, he is to
show his judgments in an extreme way.
4
Poetry
Third Year- Second lecture
By: Hayder Gebreen
As he was an extremist, Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) has either so violent or so civil judgements and to
him, people were either God or devil and nothing in-betweens.
Dryden satirizes Zimri (Duke of Buckingham)who has abnormal talent which is wasting money on rewards
for those fools who eventually desert him.
Those fools who are beggars that Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) had found late in his life. He had his fun
time and they had his money.
Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) left the court of king David (Charles II) to seek relief by establishing the Whig
party but could not be the leader.
5
Poetry
Third Year- Second lecture
By: Hayder Gebreen
In spite of Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) was one of the political personages who founded the Whig party,
the leadership went to Absalom (Duke of Monmouth) and Achitophel (Duke of Shaftesbury).
As a result, Zimri (Duke of Buckingham) who was wicked in his intentions, but he was bereft of means to
achieve his goals, left not only his political party "faction" but he also retired from in general life finally.
Allegory is a metaphor whose means may be a character, place or event, representing real-world issues
and occurrences. Allegory has been used widely because it can freely illustrate complex ideas and
concepts in ways that are comprehensible to its readers.Writers typically use allegories as literary devices
or as stylistic devices that convey hidden meanings through symbolic figures, actions, imagery, and/or
events, which together create the moral, spiritual, or political meaning the author wishes to convey.
Discuss Absalom and Achitophel by John Dryden as a political satire. Or discuss as biblical allegory.
John Dryden wrote Absalom and Achitophel as a political satire. Dryden devotes the poem to depict a
mocking portraits of Whig leaders, whose real names he hides using Biblical names like Absalom,
Achitophel and Zimri. The era was that during which a political party in England was trying to seat the
illegitimate son of Charles II (after the Restoration) on the throne through a rebellion against Charles II.
Dryden used a Biblical tale, that of the rebellion of Absalom against King David, in the humor of satire
stated to point out the wrongfulness of a rebellion and the disastrous outcome of such a rebellion.
Through allegorical allusions to the Bible incident of King David and his illegitimate son, Absalom,
Absalom and Achitophel is a satire of Charles II's political enemies. The poem, which shows the plots
devised by Absalom and Achitophel to overthrow King David, celebrates the loyalty to the King by his
allies and shames its enemies. Appearing in 1681, the work was thus a staunch defense of the English
monarchy at a time when the institution was under heavy criticism from Parliament for the King's
Catholic heir. In the same year of publication of Absalom and Achitophel, the monarch dissolved
Parliament and ruled alone until his death four years later.
6
Poetry
Third Year- Second lecture
By: Hayder Gebreen