Global Wealth Databook 2015
Global Wealth Databook 2015
Research Institute
Thought leadership from Credit Suisse Research
and the world’s foremost experts
Global Wealth
Databook 2015
October 2015
Preface
Since 2010, the Credit Suisse Wealth Report has been the leading reference on global wealth.
It contains the most comprehensive and up-to-date findings on global wealth across the entire
wealth spectrum – from the very base of the “wealth pyramid,” capturing 3.4 billion adults with
wealth below USD 10,000, to the millionaires, who account for 0.7% of adult population, but
yet own 45.2% of global wealth.
Research for the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Databook has been undertaken on behalf of the
Credit Suisse Research Institute by Professors Anthony Shorrocks and Jim Davies, recognized
authorities on this topic and the architects and principal authors of "Personal Wealth from a
Global Perspective," Oxford University Press, 2008. Rodrigo Lluberas has also been a very
significant contributor to the project.
The aim of the Credit Suisse Global Wealth project is to provide the best available estimates of
the wealth holdings of households around the world for the period since the year 2000. While
the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report highlights the main findings of our study, this 158-page
Databook underlines the extent of our analysis. More importantly, it sets out in detail the data
employed in our Global Wealth project, the methodology used to calculate estimates of wealth
and how this may differ from other reports in this field.
The Credit Suisse Global Wealth Databook provides detailed information on the evolution of
household wealth levels through the period 2000 to mid-2015 at both the regional and country
level. It presents our estimates on the distribution of wealth for over 200 countries. Based on
this rich data, the Databook presents findings on the global middle class, its size and how it
fared over time.
Markus Stierli
Head of Fundamental Micro Research, Credit Suisse Private Banking & Wealth Management
Contents
3 Preface
5 Section 1 Estimating the pattern of global household wealth
10 Table 1-1 Coverage of wealth levels data
11 Table 1-2 Household balance sheet and financial balance sheet sources
13 Table 1-3 Survey sources
14 Table 1-4 Changes in asset prices and exchange rates 2013–2015, selected countries
15 Table 1-5 Wealth shares for countries with wealth distribution data
17 Section 2 Household wealth levels, 2000–2015
19 Table 2-1 Country details
23 Table 2-2 Population by country (thousands)
27 Table 2-3 Number of adults by country (thousands)
31 Table 2-4 (by year) Wealth estimates by country 2000–2015
95 Table 2-5 Components of wealth per adult in USD, by region and year
96 Table 2-6 Components of wealth as percentage of gross wealth, by region and year
97 Table 2-7 Changes in household wealth 2014–2015, selected countries
98 Section 3 Estimating the distribution of global wealth
101 Table 3-1 Wealth pattern within countries, 2015
105 Table 3-2 Wealth pattern by region, 2015
106 Table 3-3 Membership of top wealth groups for selected countries, 2015
107 Table 3-4 Percentage membership of global wealth deciles and top percentiles by country of residence, 2015
111 Table 3-5 Main gains and losses in global wealth distribution, 2014–2015
112 Table 3-6 High net worth individuals by country and region, 2015
114 Section 4 The global middle class
121 Table 4-1 Minimum wealth of middle class, 2015, selected countries
122 Table 4-2 Share of middle-class adults and wealth, 2015 by region
123 Table 4-3 Number of middle-class adults (million), 2015 by region and country
124 Table 4-4 Middle-class share of all adults (%), 2015, by country and region
125 Table 4-5 Wealth holdings of middle class, 2015, by country and region
126 Table 4-6 Ratio of share of middle-class wealth to share of middle-class adults, 2015
127 Table 4-7 Change in number of middle-class adults, 2000–2015, for regions and selected countries
128 Table 4-8 Change in total wealth of middle class, 2000–2015, for regions and selected countries
129 Table 4-9 Percentage of wealth owned by middle-class adults, 2000–2015, by region
129 Table 4-10 Number of middle-class adults (million) in China and USA, 2000–2015
130 Section 5 Composition of wealth portfolios
133 Table 5-1 Assets and debts as percentage of gross household wealth for selected countries by year
134 Table 5-2 Percentage composition of gross household financial wealth, by country and year
137 Section 6 Region and country focus
143 Table 6-1 Summary details for regions and selected countries, 2015
144 Table 6-2 Wealth per adult (in USD) at current and constant exchange rates, for regions and selected countries, 2000–2015
146 Table 6-3 Total wealth (in USD bn) at current and constant exchange rates, for regions and selected countries, 2000–2015
148 Table 6-4 Composition of wealth per adult for regions and selected countries, 2015
149 Table 6-5 Wealth shares and minimum wealth of deciles and top percentiles for regions and selected countries, 2015
150 Table 6-6 Distribution of wealth for regions and selected countries, 2015
153 Bibliography and data references
156 About the authors
157 Imprint
158 General disclaimer / Important information
1.1 Introduction
We aim to provide the best available estimates of the wealth holdings of households around the
world for each year since 2000. More specifically, we are interested in the distribution within
and across nations of individual net worth, defined as the marketable value of financial assets
plus non-financial assets (principally housing and land) less debts. No country in the world has a
single comprehensive source of information on personal wealth, and many low and middle
income countries have little direct evidence of any kind. However a growing number of countries
– including China and India as well many high income countries – have relevant data from a
variety of different sources which we are able to exploit in order to achieve our objective.
The procedure involves three main steps, the first two of which mimic the structure followed by
Davies et al (2008, 2011). The first step establishes the average level of wealth for each country.
The best source of data for this purpose is household balance sheet (HBS) data, which are now
provided by 48 countries, although 31 of these countries cover only financial assets and debts. An
additional four countries have household survey data from which wealth levels can be calculated.
Together these countries cover 66% of the global population and 96% of total global wealth. The
results are supplemented by econometric techniques, which generate estimates of the level of
wealth in 160 countries that lack direct information for one or more years.
The second step involves constructing the pattern of wealth holdings within nations. Direct data
on the distribution of wealth are available for 31 countries. Inspection of data for these countries
suggests a relationship between wealth distribution and income distribution, which can be
exploited in order to provide a rough estimate of wealth distribution for 135 other countries,
which have data on income distribution but not on wealth ownership.
It is well known that the traditional sources of wealth distribution data are unlikely to provide an
accurate picture of wealth ownership in the top tail of the distribution for most countries. To
overcome this deficiency, the third step makes use of the information in the rich lists published
by Forbes Magazine and others to adjust the wealth distribution pattern in the highest wealth
ranges.
Implementing these procedures leaves 50 countries for which it is difficult to estimate either the
level of household wealth or the distribution of wealth, or both. Usually the countries concerned
are small (e.g. Andorra, Bermuda, Guatemala, Monaco) or semi-detached from the global
economy (e.g. Afghanistan, Cuba, North Korea). For our estimates of the pattern of global
wealth, we assign these countries the average level and distribution of the region and income
class to which they belong. This is done in preference to omitting the countries altogether,
which would implicitly assume that their pattern of wealth holdings matches the world average.
However, checks indicate that excluding these nations from the global picture makes little
difference to the results.
Table 2-1 lists the 215 countries in the world along with some summary details. Note that China
and India are treated as separate regions due to the size of their populations.
The following sections describe the estimation procedures in more detail. Two other general
points should be mentioned at the outset. First, we use official exchange rates throughout to
convert currencies to our standard measure of value, which is US dollars at the time in question.
In international comparisons of consumption or income it is common to convert currencies using
purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rates, which take account of local prices, especially for
non-traded services. However, in all countries a large share of personal wealth is owned by
households in the top few percentiles of the distribution, who tend to be internationally mobile
and to move their assets across borders with significant frequency. For such people, the
prevailing foreign currency rate is most relevant for international comparisons. So there is a
stronger case for using official exchange rates in studies of global wealth.
The second issue concerns the appropriate unit of analysis. A case can be made for basing the
analysis on households or families. However, personal assets and debts are typically owned (or
owed) by named individuals, and may be retained by those individuals if they leave the family.
Furthermore, even though some household assets, such as housing, provide communal
benefits, it is unusual for household members to have an equal say in the management of
assets, or to share equally in the proceeds if the asset is sold. Membership of households can
be quite fluid (for example, with respect to older children living away from home) and the pattern
of household structure varies markedly across countries. For all these reasons – plus the
practical consideration that the number of households is unknown in most countries – we prefer
to base our analysis on individuals rather than household or family units. More specifically, since
children have little formal or actual wealth ownership, we focus on wealth ownership by adults,
defined to be individuals aged 20 or above.
The most reliable source of information on household wealth is household balance sheet (HBS)
data. As shown in Table 1-1, “complete” financial and non-financial “real” balance sheet data
are available for 17 countries for at least one year. These are predominantly high income
countries, the exceptions being the Czech Republic and South Africa, which fall within the upper
middle income category according to the World Bank. The data are described as complete if
financial assets, liabilities and non-financial assets are all adequately covered. Another 31
countries have financial balance sheets, but no details of real assets. This group contains eleven
upper middle income countries and six lower middle income countries, and hence is less biased
towards the rich world. The sources of these data are recorded in Table 1-2.
Europe and North America, and OECD countries in particular, are well represented among
countries with HBS data, but coverage is sparse in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Fortunately
survey evidence on wealth is available for the largest developing countries – China, India and
Indonesia – which compensates to some extent for this deficiency. Although only financial HBS
data are available for Russia, complete HBS data are available for the Czech Republic and
financial data are recorded for nine other former socialist countries in Europe.
housing, which is the main component of non-financial assets (see Davies and Shorrocks,
2000, p. 630). Our methodology recognizes the general under-reporting of financial assets in
surveys and attempts to correct this deficiency.
Other features of the survey evidence from developing countries capture important real
differences. Very high shares of non-financial wealth are found for the two low-income
countries in our sample, India and Indonesia, reflecting both the importance of land and
agricultural assets and the lack of financial development. On the other hand, the share of non-
financial assets in China is relatively modest, in part because urban land is not privately owned.
In addition, there has been rapid accumulation of financial assets by Chinese households in
recent years. Debts are very low in India and Indonesia, again reflecting poorly developed
financial markets.
For countries which have both HBS and survey data, we give priority to the HBS figures. The
HBS estimates typically use a country’s wealth survey results as one input, but also take
account of other sources of information and should therefore dominate wealth survey estimates
in quality. However, this does not ensure that HBS data are error-free.
For countries lacking direct data on wealth, we use standard econometric techniques to
estimate per capita wealth levels from the 51 countries with HBS or survey data in at least one
year. Data availability limits the number of countries that can be included in this procedure.
However, we are able to employ a theoretically attractive model that yields observed or
estimated wealth values for 174 countries, which collectively cover 97% of the world’s
population in 2015. There is a trade-off here between coverage and reliability. Alternative sets
of explanatory variables could achieve greater country coverage, but not without compromising
the quality of the regression estimates.
Separate regressions are run for financial assets, non-financial assets and liabilities. As errors in
the three equations are likely to be correlated, the seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR)
technique due to Zellner (1962) is applied, but only to financial assets and liabilities, since there
are fewer observations for non-financial assets. The independent variables selected are broadly
those used in Davies et al (2011). In particular, we include a dummy for cases where the data
source is a survey rather than HBS data. This turns out to be negative and highly significant in
the financial assets regression, indicating that the average level of financial assets tends to be
much lower when the data derive from sample surveys. We use this result to adjust upwards the
value of financial assets in the wealth level estimates for China, India and Indonesia. We also
include region-income dummies to capture any common fixed effects at the region-income
level, and year dummies to control for shocks – like the recent financial crisis – or time trends
that affect the world as a whole.
The resulting estimates of net worth per adult and the three components are reported in Table
2-4 for the years 2000 to 2015. HBS data are used where available (see Table 1-1); corrected
survey data are used for China, India and Indonesia in specific years. Financial assets and
liabilities are estimated for 147 countries, and non-financial assets for 164 countries in at least
one year using the regressions described in the previous section.
There remain 38 countries containing 3% of the global adult population without an estimate of
wealth per adult. In order to generate wealth figures for regions and for the world as a whole,
we assigned to each of these countries the mean wealth per adult of the corresponding region
(six categories) and income class (four categories). This imputation is admittedly crude, but
better than simply disregarding the excluded countries, which would implicitly assume
(incorrectly) that the countries concerned are representative of their region or the world.
For a few countries, including the United States, wealth levels are available for the most recent
years, including the first quarter of 2015. However, the majority of countries are missing wealth
levels for at least part of the period 2012–2015. In order to obtain estimates of net worth per
adult and its components we update the most recent available figures using, where available,
house price growth for non-financial assets, market capitalization for financial assets and GDP
per capita growth for debts (see Table 1-4). Our projections are based on estimated
relationships between these variables and the corresponding asset/debt totals in preceding
years, rather than on proportionality. For countries without information on house prices and
market capitalization, recent growth of GDP per capita is used to project net worth per adult
forwards to mid-2015.
An analysis of the global pattern of wealth holdings by individuals requires information on the
distribution of wealth within countries. Direct observations on wealth distribution across
households or individuals are available for 31 countries. One set of figures was selected for
each of these nations, with a preference for the most recent year, and for the most reliable
source of information. Summary details are reported in Table 1-5 using a common template,
which gives the shares of the top 10%, 5%, 1%, together with other distributional information
in the form of cumulated shares of wealth (i.e. Lorenz curve ordinates.)
The distributional data now available have certain fairly standard features. The unit of analysis is
usually a household or family, but is in a few cases the (adult) individual. Household sample
surveys are employed in almost all countries. The exceptions are the Nordic countries
(Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) and Switzerland which use data from tax and other
registers covering the entire population. For all other countries, the wealth shares of the top
groups are expected to be understated because wealthy households are less likely to respond,
and because the financial assets that are of greater importance to the wealthy – for example,
equities and bonds – are especially likely to be under-reported. Even in the U.S. Survey of
Consumer Finance, where sophisticated measures are taken to counteract these problems, the
sampling frame excludes the “Forbes 400” richest families, so that the extreme upper tail is not
captured by design. And in those countries using register data there can be problems due to
valuation problems, for example in connection with pension assets and life insurance.
The summary details reported in Table 1-5 show relatively sparse distributional information.
Estimates for the empty cells were generated by an ungrouping computer program, which
constructs a synthetic sample conforming exactly to any set of Lorenz values derived from a
positive variable (Shorrocks and Wan, 2009).
For most countries lacking direct wealth distribution data, the pattern of wealth distribution was
constructed from information on income distribution, based on the view that wealth inequality is
likely to be highly correlated with income inequality across countries. Income distribution data for
166 countries was compiled from the World Development Indicators of the World Bank and the
World Income Inequality Database, with priority given to the most recently available year. The
ungrouping program was then used to generate all the Lorenz curve values required for the
template employed for wealth distribution.
For the 31 countries which have data on both wealth and income distribution, the Lorenz curves
for wealth are lower everywhere than for income, indicating that wealth is more unequally
distributed than income. We grouped these 31 reference countries into two categories (North
America and Europe vs. the rest of the world) and computed for each category the average
wealth to income ratio at various Lorenz points. Estimates of wealth distribution for the 135
countries lacking wealth data were then generated by scaling up the Lorenz figures for income
by the relevant average wealth-income ratios.
For the purpose of generating regional and global wealth patterns, we assigned a wealth
distribution pattern to each country lacking income distribution data equal to the (adult
population weighted) average of the corresponding region and income class. This again was
done in preference to simply disregarding the countries concerned.
To construct the global distribution of wealth, the level of wealth derived for each country was
combined with details of its wealth pattern. Specifically, the ungrouping program was applied to
each country to generate a set of synthetic sample values and sample weights consistent with
the (estimated or imputed) wealth distribution. Each synthetic sample observation represents
10,000 adults in the bottom 90% of the distribution, 1,000 adults in the top decile, and 100
adults in the top percentile. The wealth sample values were then scaled up to match the mean
wealth of the respective country, and merged into a single world dataset comprising 1.3 million
observations. The complete global sample may be processed in a variety of ways, for example
to obtain the minimum wealth and the wealth share of each percentile in the global distribution
of wealth. The distribution within regions may also be calculated, along with the number of
representatives of each country in any given global wealth percentile.
The survey data from which most of our wealth distribution estimates are derived tend to under-
represent the wealthiest groups and to omit ultra-high net worth individuals. This deficiency does
not affect our estimates of average wealth levels around the world, since these are determined
by other methods. It does imply that the shares of the top percentile and top decile are likely to
err on the low side unless adjustments are made to the upper tail. We would also not expect to
generate accurate predictions of the number and value of holdings of high net worth individuals.
We tackle this problem by exploiting well-known statistical regularities in the top wealth tail and
by making use of information on the wealth holdings of named individuals revealed in the rich list
data reported by Forbes magazine and other publications. As described in more detail in
Section 3, we use the number of billionaires reported by Forbes to fit a Pareto distribution to the
upper tail of 56 countries. The revised top tail values in the synthetic sample were then replaced
by the new estimates, and the resulting sample for each country was re-scaled to match the
mean wealth value. This sequence was repeated until the process converged, typically after a
few rounds. The overall global weighted sample still contains 1.3 million observations, each
representing between 100 and 10,000 adults. The adjusted sample can be used to produce
improved estimates of the true wealth pattern within countries, regions and the world. The
minimum sample size of 100 allows reliable estimates of the number and value of wealth
holdings up to USD 100 million at the regional and global level. Estimates above USD 100
million are obtained from projecting the Pareto distribution forward.
A further recent refinement allows us to pool the Forbes data for every year this century
(currently 16 years). This produces more reliable wealth distribution estimates and enables us to
produces a wealth sample for each year since 2000. The resulting data allow the trend in
wealth inequality within countries and regions to be identified.
While the study of global household wealth is still in its infancy, enormous progress has been
achieved in recent years. Data on the level of wealth are improving in quality and are available
for more countries. Household wealth surveys have begun in a number of countries, including a
major initiative within the Eurozone. In this work, efforts have been made to improve
comparability by standardizing the definitions of the components of personal wealth and by
seeking agreement on the appropriate methods of valuation. More needs to be done to improve
the quality and frequency of wealth data, and to make the data available for a greater number of
countries. In the meantime, we will continue to try to fill the gaps in the estimates of wealth level
by country and to improve the estimates of wealth distribution within countries. In future, some
revisions to our estimates are inevitable. Nevertheless, we are confident that the broad trends
revealed in the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report for 2015 will remain substantially intact.
Number of countries
with wealth imputed by 19 5 9 6 100.0 100.0
mean value of group
Source: Columns 8-9 computed from Table 2-4 data for 2015
Table 1-2: Household balance sheet and financial balance sheet sources
Financial and non-
Country Financial data Non-financial data Link to open-access data
financial data compiled by
Australia Australian Bureau of Statistics Australian Bureau of Statistics Australian Bureau of Statistics [Link]
Austria OECD and Oesterreichische Nationalbank n.a. n.a. [Link]; [Link]
Belgium OECD n.a. n.a. [Link]
Brazil OECD n.a. n.a. [Link]
Bulgaria OECD n.a. n.a. [Link]
Canada Statistics Canada Statistics Canada Statistics Canada [Link]
Chile Chile Central Bank n.a. n.a. [Link]
Colombia Colombia Central Bank n.a. n.a. [Link]
Croatia Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets n.a. n.a. [Link]/eurostat
Cyprus Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets n.a. n.a. [Link]/eurostat
Czech Republic OECD and Czech National Bank (CNB) OECD and CNB Authors [Link]; [Link]
Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets and [Link]/eurostat;
Denmark Statistics Denmark Authors
Statistics Denmark [Link]
[Link];
Estonia OECD and Bank of Estonia n.a. n.a.
[Link]
Finland OECD and Statistics Finland n.a. n.a. [Link]; [Link]
[Link]; [Link]-
France OECD and Banque de France OECD Authors
[Link]
OECD and Eurostat Financial Balance [Link];
Germany OECD Authors
Sheets [Link]/eurostat
Greece Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets n.a. n.a. [Link]/eurostat
Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets and [Link]/eurostat;
Hungary n.a. n.a.
Hungarian Central Bank [Link]/
[Link];
OECD and Eurostat Financial Balance
Ireland n.a. n.a. [Link]/eurostat;
Sheets and Central Bank of Ireland
[Link]
Israel OECD OECD Authors [Link]
Bank of Italy and Eurostat Financial Balance
Italy Bank of Italy and OECD Authors [Link]
Sheets
Japan OECD and Bank of Japan OECD Authors [Link]; [Link]
Unicredit: CEE Households’ Wealth and
Kazakhstan n.a. n.a. n.a.
Debt Monitor
Korea OECD and Bank of Korea n.a. n.a. [Link]; [Link]
Latvia Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets n.a. n.a. [Link]/eurostat
Lithuania Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets n.a. n.a. [Link]/eurostat
Luxembourg OECD and Banque Central du Luxembourg n.a. n.a. [Link]; [Link]
Malta OECD n.a. n.a. [Link]
Mexico OECD n.a. n.a. [Link]
Netherlands OECD OECD Authors [Link]
New Zealand New Zealand Reserve Board OECD Authors [Link]
Norway OECD and Statistics Norway n.a. n.a. [Link]; [Link]
Poland OECD and National Bank of Poland n.a. n.a. [Link]; [Link]
Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets and [Link]/eurostat;
Portugal n.a. n.a.
Banco de Portugal [Link]
Table 1-2: Household balance sheet and financial balance sheet sources, continued
Financial and non-
Country Financial data Non-financial data Link to open-access data
financial data compiled by
Romania Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets n.a. n.a. [Link]/eurostat
Unicredit: CEE Households’ Wealth and
Russia n.a. n.a. n.a.
Debt Monitor
Singapore Department of Singapore Department of
Singapore Singapore Department of Statistics [Link]
Statistics Statistics
Slovakia OECD and Národná banka Slovenska n.a. n.a. [Link]; [Link]
OECD and Eurostat Financial Balance [Link];
Slovenia n.a. n.a.
Sheets [Link]/eurostat
Aron, Muellbauer and Prinsloo (2007) and Aron, Muellbauer and Prinsloo
South Africa Same as for financial data [Link]
South African Reserve Bank (2007)
Spain Bank of Spain n.a. n.a. [Link]
Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets and [Link]/eurostat;
Sweden n.a. n.a.
Sveriges Riskbank [Link]
Switzerland OECD OECD Authors [Link]
Flow of Funds, Republic of China (Taiwan),
Taiwan Central Bank of China Central Bank of China [Link]
Central Bank of China
IMF Global Financial Stability Report 2006,
Thailand n.a. n.a. n.a.
Chapter 2
Unicredit: CEE Households’ Wealth and
Turkey n.a. n.a. n.a.
Debt Monitor
[Link];
OECD, Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets
United Kingdom OECD Authors [Link];
and Office for National Statistics
[Link]/eurostat
OECD and Federal Reserve Board (FRB)
United States Same as for financial data Authors [Link]
Flow of Fund Accounts, Table B.100
n.a. = not available
Canada 2012 Survey of Financial Security; computations made by Statistics Canada (special request)
Encuesta Financiera de Hogares (own calculations); [Link]
Chile 2011
economicas/financiera-hogares
China 2002 China Academy of Social Science Survey; see Li and Zhao (2008).
New Zealand 2001 Household Saving Survey; see Statistics New Zealand (2002).
Norway 2013 Norwegian Income and Wealth Statistics for Households, see Statistics Norway.
Sweden 2007 Wealth statistics based on registers of total population; see Statistics Sweden (2007).
Switzerland 1997 Survey based on county wealth tax statistics; see Dell et al. (2005).
Table 1-4: Changes in asset prices and exchange rates 2014–2015, selected countries
Change in market capitalization (%) Change in house price index (%) Change in USD exchange rate (%)
Source: (1) Exchange rates: International Monetary Fund, (2) Market capitalization: Bloomberg and Datastream and (3) House prices:
Datastream
Table 1-5: Wealth shares for countries with wealth distribution data
Share of lowest
Country Year Unit
10% 20% 25% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Australia 2010 household 0.9 6.3 18.2
Austria 2010 household -0.7 -0.6 -0.2 0.7 2.7 6.7 13.3
Belgium 2010 household -0.1 0.2 1.5 4.8 10.1 17.1 26.5
Canada 2012 family -0.2 -0.1 0.5 2.2 5.6 11.3 20.0
Chile 2011 household -1.2 -1.2 -1.0 2.3 9.4 18.0 28.9
China 2002 person 0.7 2.8 5.8 9.6 14.4 20.6 29.0
Cyprus 2010 household -0.2 0.3 1.6 4.0 7.3 12.0 18.3
Denmark 2009 family -15.3 -18.9 -20.2 -20.2 -19.0 -15.0 -6.8
Finland 2010 household -1.2 -1.1 -0.7 1.1 5.2 11.9 21.5
France 2010 household -0.2 -0.1 0.4 1.8 5.4 11.6 20.5
Germany 2010 household -0.6 -0.5 -0.1 0.8 2.8 6.5 12.9
Greece 2009 household -0.2 0.3 2.3 6.4 12.4 20.2 30.2
India 2012 household -1.3 -0.9 0.1 1.7 4.2 8.0 13.6
Indonesia 1997 household 0.0 0.4 1.3 2.8 5.1 8.5 13.5
Italy 2010 household -0.1 0.1 0.4 1.0 4.1 9.4 16.5 25.6
Japan 2009 household 0.4 1.3 2.1 3.3 6.9 12.5 20.2 30.7
Korea 2011 household -0.1 4.5 15.2
Luxembourg 2010 household -0.2 0.1 1.0 3.8 8.5 14.9 22.8
Malta 2010 household 0.1 1.1 3.5 7.3 12.5 19.1 27.3
Netherlands 2009 household -3.5 -3.3 -2.4 0.0 4.9 12.4 23.5
New Zealand 2001 tax unit 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 7.0 13.0 21.0
Norway 2013 household -5.0 -5.4 -5.1 -3.2 1.1 8.1 17.9
Portugal 2010 household -0.2 0.1 1.3 4.1 8.3 13.9 21.5
Slovakia 2010 household 0.4 3.2 7.8 13.6 20.6 28.9 38.9
Slovenia 2010 household -0.1 0.9 3.6 7.8 13.5 21.5 31.7
Spain 2008 household -0.4 0.3 1.3 2.8 6.7 12.0 18.9 27.5
Sweden 2007 adult
Switzerland 1997 family
Thailand 2006 household 0.5 3.5 12.5
United Kingdom 2008 adult 0.0 0.5 1.8 4.6 9.2 15.7 24.8
United States 2013 family -0.7 -0.5 0.0 1.1 3.2 6.9
Table 1-5: Wealth shares for countries with wealth distribution data, continued
Share of top
Country Year Unit
25% 20% 10% 5% 2% 1% 0.5% 0.1%
Australia 2010 household 61.8
Austria 2010 household 77.1 61.7
Belgium 2010 household 61.2 44.1
Canada 2012 family 67.2 47.7
Chile 2011 household 56.4 37.6
China 2002 person 59.3 41.4
Cyprus 2010 household 72.4 56.8
Denmark 2009 family 92.8 69.3
Finland 2010 household 64.9 45.0
France 2010 household 67.5 50.0
Germany 2010 household 76.3 59.2
Greece 2009 household 56.7 38.8
India 2012 household 77.6 62.1 25.7
Indonesia 1997 household 78.9 65.4 56.0 28.7
Italy 2010 household 68.9 62.6 45.7 32.9 21.0 14.8
Japan 2009 household 62.8 55.3 34.3 19.3 4.3
Korea 2011 household 63.9
Luxembourg 2010 household 66.7 51.3
Malta 2010 household 62.0 46.9
Netherlands 2009 household 61.3 40.2
New Zealand 2001 tax unit 67.0 48.0
Norway 2013 household 68.6 49.5 35.8 18.3 8.3
Portugal 2010 household 67.9 52.7
Slovakia 2010 household 48.9 32.8
Slovenia 2010 household 54.3 36.2
Spain 2008 household 67.3 61.3 45.0 32.6 21.7 16.5
Sweden 2007 adult 67.0 49.0 24.0
Switzerland 1997 family 71.3 58.0 34.8 27.6 16.0
Thailand 2006 household 69.5
United Kingdom 2008 adult 62.8 44.3 30.5 12.5
United States 2013 family 90.5 87.0 75.0 35.5
Source: See Table 1-3
2.1 Introduction
As explained in Section 1, our ambition is to generate the global pattern of household wealth.
The first stage in this process is to estimate the average level of household wealth and its core
components for every country and every year since 2000.
Table 2-1 identifies 215 countries in 2015 and reports some core variables, including the
classification by region, by income class according to the World Bank, and our assessment of
the quality of wealth data.
Population figures are available for all countries and years and are reported in Table 2-2.
Figures for the number of adults, i.e. individuals aged 20 or above, are also available for most
countries and years. Where the data are not reported elsewhere, we estimate the number of
adults by assuming that the adult ratio is the (population weighted) average for the
corresponding region and income class. The results are summarized in Table 2-3.
The procedure outlined in Section 1 describes the three ways in which wealth levels data are
assembled: direct estimates via national household balance sheets (HBS) or household surveys;
regression estimates using likely correlated variables; and imputations based on the region-
income class average. In practice, the situation is slightly more complicated because some
countries have direct observations for, say, financial wealth, but require non-financial wealth to
be estimated. The timeliness of direct data is greatly improved nowadays. For financial wealth at
least, direct estimates for the first quarter of 2015 were available for 27 countries: Australia,
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany,
Greece, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal,
Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. These
countries account for 76% of global wealth in 2015. In contrast, regression-based estimates
are impossible for many countries in recent years because data is missing on core regressors. In
these situations, wealth estimates are obtained by taking the figure for the most recent year and
updating using subsequent movements in stock market indices, house price indices, or – if
nothing better is available – growth of GDP.
In Table 2-1, we do our best to summarize the quality of wealth data for each country on a five-
point scale. A country gets five points, and a good rating if it has complete HBS data, and either
wealth distribution data or a good basis for estimating the shape of the wealth distribution. A
satisfactory rating and four points go to countries that would get a good rating except that their
HBS data does not cover non-financial assets. These countries must have a full set of
independent variables allowing regression-based estimates of non-financial assets. Countries
without any HBS data but with a household wealth survey or other wealth distribution data (from
estate tax or wealth tax sources) get a fair rating and three points. A poor rating (two points)
goes to countries without HBS or wealth distribution data, but having a full set of independent
variables allowing estimation of their wealth levels. If some independent variables are missing
but the regressions can still be performed, the rating is very poor (one point).
In Table 2-1, there are 42 countries for which wealth data quality is not assessed. These are
the countries for which we have no sensible basis for estimating wealth. In calculating the
regional and global wealth figures, we assign these countries the region-income class average;
but the separate country data are not reported in the later tables.
Most of the column content is self-explanatory. The last column indicates the estimation method
used for the wealth levels, grouped into five categories. Most figures up to 2008 are labeled as
either (1) “HBS”, indicating data from official household balance sheets, (2) “survey data,” or (3)
“regression,” referring to estimated values based on wealth regressions. When multiple methods
are employed (e.g. for financial assets and non-financial assets), we report either “HBS” or
“survey data” as appropriate. Two labels are typically reported for recent years. “Updated HBS”
and “Updated regression” mean HBS data (respectively, regression estimates) updated using
market capitalization growth for financial assets, house prices for non-financial assets and GDP
per capita growth for debts. For countries lacking information on house prices or market
capitalization, GDP per capita growth was used to project net worth per adult forward to the
years 2010–2015.
Wealth estimates for recent years are subject to future revision as statistical agencies release
more data. Wealth estimates for earlier periods should be less prone to change. As a rough
guide, we expect that our wealth estimates prior to 2010 are not likely to change much in the
future. However, statistical agencies occasionally make significant revisions to their historical
data series – reflecting altered definitions of categories, or improved valuations, for example.
When this happens, we are obliged to respect the new figures, and this can have repercussions
for the wealth estimates of other countries, given the methods we employ. In addition, our
methods are constantly being refined in response to new developments at the frontier of
research. This too can affect the historical data, although mainly for countries with little hard
evidence on wealth, and hence more reliant on the techniques used to derive our estimates.
Table 2-5 provides similar details regarding the relative importance over time of the three main
subcomponents of household wealth: financial assets, non-financial assets (principally housing
and land) and debts. At the start of the millennium, financial assets accounted for 55% of gross
household assets. This share fell until 2008, when it briefly dipped below 50%. Since that time
non-financial assets have shown little growth worldwide, in contrast to financial wealth, which
has grown robustly. As a consequence, the share of financial wealth has recovered to 55%
compared to 45% for non-financial assets, the same division of the portfolio as in 2000.
Expressed as a proportion of household net worth, debt has moved in the opposite direction,
and within a relatively narrow range. Globally, household debt rose from 14% of gross wealth in
2000 to 17% in 2008, and has since returned to the 14% level observed at the start of the
century.
Finally, Table 2-7 extracts information on changes in household wealth in the 12 months to mid-
2015. The United States again leads in terms of absolute wealth gains, but is overtaken by
Hong Kong and China when gains are expressed as percentages. Japan, France, Italy,
Germany lost the most wealth measured in USD at current exchange rates. But Ukraine,
Russia, Brazil and Colombia were the main losers in percentage terms.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Table 2-5: Components of wealth per adult in USD, by region and year
Year
Region 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Africa Financial wealth 1,446 2,319 2,863 3,758 2,539 2,747 2,900 2,766 2,882 2,770 2,733 2,441
Non-financial wealth 1,671 2,271 2,677 3,231 2,882 2,828 3,005 2,834 2,927 2,868 2,855 2,605
Debts 202 356 425 534 445 504 536 542 568 520 531 511
Gross wealth 3,117 4,590 5,540 6,989 5,421 5,575 5,905 5,600 5,809 5,638 5,588 5,046
Net wealth 2,916 4,235 5,115 6,456 4,976 5,071 5,369 5,057 5,241 5,118 5,058 4,536
Net wealth at constant
2,465 3,965 4,796 5,761 5,018 4,897 5,357 5,362 5,754 6,064 6,090 6,363
exchange rates
Asia-Pacific Financial wealth 19,688 21,969 22,941 24,465 24,215 25,481 26,103 30,058 29,598 27,569 28,561 25,270
Non-financial wealth 19,370 19,389 21,108 23,652 23,352 23,432 25,845 28,126 26,924 24,535 25,885 22,927
Debts 5,963 6,379 6,672 7,223 7,351 7,457 7,605 8,883 8,659 7,978 8,417 7,691
Gross wealth 39,058 41,358 44,049 48,117 47,567 48,913 51,948 58,184 56,522 52,104 54,446 48,197
Net wealth 33,096 34,980 37,377 40,894 40,216 41,455 44,344 49,301 47,863 44,127 46,029 40,505
Net wealth at constant
35,936 37,419 39,240 40,865 38,354 38,323 41,166 41,943 42,852 44,797 45,314 46,131
exchange rates
China Financial wealth 2,620 4,543 6,132 8,512 5,692 8,388 9,479 10,281 10,573 11,325 11,125 12,752
Non-financial wealth 3,244 5,594 6,919 8,720 8,520 9,008 9,493 10,542 10,766 11,947 11,788 11,704
Debts 191 366 469 589 522 601 772 1,121 1,303 1,577 1,662 1,943
Gross wealth 5,864 10,137 13,051 17,232 14,212 17,396 18,972 20,823 21,339 23,272 22,913 24,456
Net wealth 5,672 9,770 12,582 16,643 13,690 16,795 18,200 19,703 20,037 21,695 21,250 22,513
Net wealth at constant
6,625 11,126 13,865 17,156 13,204 16,182 17,531 17,519 17,785 18,522 18,607 19,700
exchange rates
Europe Financial wealth 34,930 51,993 62,664 71,468 58,568 66,213 64,762 63,048 67,779 74,291 77,307 69,211
Non-financial wealth 36,087 67,080 81,038 95,699 85,091 88,925 86,667 84,689 89,063 93,634 95,237 81,510
Debts 9,730 17,542 21,470 25,213 23,195 24,628 23,333 23,588 24,573 25,576 25,670 22,216
Gross wealth 71,017 119,073 143,702 167,167 143,659 155,138 151,429 147,737 156,842 167,925 172,544 150,721
Net wealth 61,287 101,532 122,232 141,955 120,464 130,510 128,097 124,149 132,269 142,349 146,873 128,506
Net wealth at constant
79,204 105,657 113,612 120,289 113,464 117,752 123,589 121,873 126,836 132,103 136,209 143,101
exchange rates
India Financial wealth 260 435 558 733 484 714 918 728 731 639 685 651
Non-financial wealth 1,833 3,030 3,522 4,604 3,489 3,843 4,612 4,102 4,258 3,919 4,118 4,047
Debts 58 132 170 230 171 188 263 257 277 284 315 346
Gross wealth 2,093 3,465 4,080 5,337 3,973 4,557 5,530 4,830 4,989 4,558 4,803 4,698
Net wealth 2,036 3,332 3,910 5,106 3,803 4,368 5,267 4,573 4,712 4,274 4,489 4,352
Net wealth at constant
1,925 3,038 3,500 4,072 3,728 4,125 4,736 4,928 5,222 5,349 5,462 5,607
exchange rates
Latin America Financial wealth 4,691 5,724 6,795 8,558 6,419 8,609 9,715 9,759 9,929 9,202 9,637 7,682
Non-financial wealth 7,661 9,492 11,444 13,922 12,610 15,301 16,480 16,931 17,009 15,959 17,010 14,093
Debts 1,131 1,339 1,601 2,194 1,911 2,656 3,359 3,686 3,786 3,628 3,945 3,267
Gross wealth 12,352 15,216 18,239 22,480 19,029 23,910 26,195 26,690 26,938 25,161 26,647 21,775
Net wealth 11,221 13,877 16,638 20,286 17,117 21,253 22,836 23,003 23,152 21,532 22,703 18,508
Net wealth at constant
8,564 13,687 16,064 18,402 18,479 20,236 21,464 23,097 23,569 24,021 24,815 25,220
exchange rates
North America Financial wealth 154,372 191,006 209,568 220,608 177,806 190,438 202,202 209,368 229,110 267,768 268,690 271,267
Non-financial wealth 79,049 126,644 130,365 126,069 109,169 103,033 104,197 103,134 111,158 118,744 120,983 129,303
Debts 34,429 53,898 58,738 62,924 61,177 60,753 60,113 57,897 57,566 58,008 58,031 58,269
Gross wealth 233,421 317,650 339,933 346,677 286,975 293,471 306,399 312,502 340,268 386,512 389,673 400,570
Net wealth 198,991 263,752 281,195 283,753 225,798 232,718 246,287 254,605 282,703 328,505 331,642 342,302
Net wealth at constant
202,064 263,695 281,145 280,087 226,659 230,410 243,048 251,596 278,712 325,981 329,134 344,041
exchange rates
World Financial wealth 20,363 25,574 28,734 31,547 26,081 28,797 29,647 30,741 32,307 34,761 35,330 33,659
Non-financial wealth 16,458 24,179 27,141 30,125 27,065 27,438 27,949 28,164 28,827 29,198 29,840 27,442
Debts 5,094 7,405 8,311 9,235 8,768 8,987 8,867 9,122 9,178 9,156 9,298 8,668
Gross wealth 36,821 49,753 55,875 61,672 53,146 56,235 57,596 58,905 61,134 63,959 65,170 61,101
Net wealth 31,727 42,348 47,564 52,437 44,378 47,249 48,729 49,783 51,956 54,803 55,873 52,432
Net wealth at constant
35,160 43,690 46,938 48,980 43,055 44,415 46,858 47,212 49,547 53,355 54,133 56,053
exchange rates
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories
Table 2-6: Components of wealth as percentage of gross wealth, by region and year
Year
Region 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Africa Financial wealth 46.4 50.5 51.7 53.8 46.8 49.3 49.1 49.4 49.6 49.1 48.9 48.4
Non-financial wealth 53.6 49.5 48.3 46.2 53.2 50.7 50.9 50.6 50.4 50.9 51.1 51.6
Debts 6.5 7.8 7.7 7.6 8.2 9.0 9.1 9.7 9.8 9.2 9.5 10.1
Asia-Pacific Financial wealth 50.4 53.1 52.1 50.8 50.9 52.1 50.2 51.7 52.4 52.9 52.5 52.4
Non-financial wealth 49.6 46.9 47.9 49.2 49.1 47.9 49.8 48.3 47.6 47.1 47.5 47.6
Debts 15.3 15.4 15.1 15.0 15.5 15.2 14.6 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.5 16.0
China Financial wealth 44.7 44.8 47.0 49.4 40.1 48.2 50.0 49.4 49.5 48.7 48.6 52.1
Non-financial wealth 55.3 55.2 53.0 50.6 59.9 51.8 50.0 50.6 50.5 51.3 51.4 47.9
Debts 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.7 3.5 4.1 5.4 6.1 6.8 7.3 7.9
Europe Financial wealth 49.2 43.7 43.6 42.8 40.8 42.7 42.8 42.7 43.2 44.2 44.8 45.9
Non-financial wealth 50.8 56.3 56.4 57.2 59.2 57.3 57.2 57.3 56.8 55.8 55.2 54.1
Debts 13.7 14.7 14.9 15.1 16.1 15.9 15.4 16.0 15.7 15.2 14.9 14.7
India Financial wealth 12.4 12.6 13.7 13.7 12.2 15.7 16.6 15.1 14.7 14.0 14.3 13.9
Non-financial wealth 87.6 87.4 86.3 86.3 87.8 84.3 83.4 84.9 85.3 86.0 85.7 86.1
Debts 2.8 3.8 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.1 4.8 5.3 5.6 6.2 6.6 7.4
Latin America Financial wealth 38.0 37.6 37.3 38.1 33.7 36.0 37.1 36.6 36.9 36.6 36.2 35.3
Non-financial wealth 62.0 62.4 62.7 61.9 66.3 64.0 62.9 63.4 63.1 63.4 63.8 64.7
Debts 9.2 8.8 8.8 9.8 10.0 11.1 12.8 13.8 14.1 14.4 14.8 15.0
North America Financial wealth 66.1 60.1 61.6 63.6 62.0 64.9 66.0 67.0 67.3 69.3 69.0 67.7
Non-financial wealth 33.9 39.9 38.4 36.4 38.0 35.1 34.0 33.0 32.7 30.7 31.0 32.3
Debts 14.7 17.0 17.3 18.2 21.3 20.7 19.6 18.5 16.9 15.0 14.9 14.5
World Financial wealth 55.3 51.4 51.4 51.2 49.1 51.2 51.5 52.2 52.8 54.3 54.2 55.1
Non-financial wealth 44.7 48.6 48.6 48.8 50.9 48.8 48.5 47.8 47.2 45.7 45.8 44.9
Debts 13.8 14.9 14.9 15.0 16.5 16.0 15.4 15.5 15.0 14.3 14.3 14.2
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories
In order to proceed, we exploit the fact that the top tail of wealth distribution is usually well
approximated by the Pareto distribution, which produces a straight line graph when the
logarithm of the number of persons above wealth level w is plotted against the logarithm of w.
Our data yield a close fit to the Pareto distribution in the wealth range from USD 250,000 to
USD 5 million. Above USD 5 million the relationship begins to break down, and the
correspondence weakens further above USD 50 million, as expected given the limitations of the
data sources and the lumpiness caused when each sample observation represents at least 100
adults. However, it seems reasonable to use a fitted Pareto line to estimate the number of
individuals in the highest echelons of the wealth distribution.
To determine the precise shape of the top wealth tail, we rely heavily on the rich list data
provided by Forbes and other sources. We make particular use of the number of billionaires
reported by Forbes, since the data are available for many years and are broadly comparable
across countries. We recognise that rich list data have limitations. The valuations of individual
wealth holdings are dominated by financial assets, especially equity holdings in public
companies traded in international markets. For practical reasons, less attention is given to non-
financial assets apart from major real estate holdings and trophy assets, such as expensive
yachts. Even less is known – and hence recorded – about personal debts. Some people
cooperate enthusiastically with those compiling the lists; others jealously guard their privacy.
There are also different country listings for nationals and residents, which is especially evident
for India, for instance. The true beneficial ownership within families adds a further level of
complexity. Assigning the wealth recorded for Bill Gates, for example, to all family members
might well result in several (unequal) billionaire holdings, so the number of billionaires would
increase in this instance. In other cases, reassigning the family wealth would reduce all the
individual holdings below the billionaire threshold. For all these reasons, rich list data should be
treated with caution. At the same time, the broad patterns and trends are informative, and they
provide the best available source of information at the apex of global wealth distribution.
top tail with the fitted Pareto values. To add a further level of refinement, the number of Forbes
billionaires – which we assume refers to billionaire families – was converted into the equivalent
number of high wealth adults. When the top wealth values have been revised, all the sample
observations for a country are scaled (usually down) in order to restore consistency with the
average level of wealth for the country, which is estimated independently. This was repeated
until the process converges, typically in a few rounds.
For the Global Wealth Report 2014 we devised a new way of pooling billionaire data for the
entire period since 2000. This leads to a considerable improvement in the reliability of the
wealth estimates, and also allows trends in top tail patterns to be identified. A second
refinement applies the Pareto top tail adjustment to each region and year. For countries lacking
enough billionaires, the regional evidence is then used to revise wealth holdings at the upper
end. This ensures a more consistent treatment between countries with rich list information and
those without.
For countries with satisfactory wealth distribution data, the adjustment has little impact on
wealth holdings below USD 1 million. However, the adjustment is more significant for countries
for which wealth distribution data is limited or non-existent. The impact on China is especially
noticeable, not surprisingly given that the wealth distribution data for China are based on a
sample survey a decade ago and given the pace of change since that time.
Table 3-1 reports figures for individual countries, and Table 3-2 provides more detail at the
regional level. The results allow us to visualize the global wealth distribution in the form of a
wealth pyramid which places adults in one of four wealth bands: under USD 10,000; between
USD 10,000 and USD 100,000; between USD 100,000 and USD 1 million; and over USD 1
million. The base level of the pyramid contains 3.4 million adults, or 71% of the global
population, but accounts for only 3% of global wealth. In contrast, dollar millionaires comprise
0.7% of all adults, but collectively own 45% of all assets. For adults with wealth exceeding
USD 100,000 and USD 1 million, Table 3-3 provides further summary information for individual
countries.
Combining the samples for all countries allows the features of the global distribution of wealth to
be identified, including, for instance, the minimum wealth of each percentile (i.e. 1% group)
worldwide and the share of total wealth owned by this group. To be among the wealthiest half of
the world in mid-2015, Table 3-4 shows that an adult needs only USD 3,210 in assets, once
debts have been subtracted. However, a person needs at least USD 68,800 to belong to the
top 10% of global wealth holders and USD 760,000 to be a member of the top 1%. Taken
together, the bottom half of the global population own less than 1% of total wealth. In sharp
contrast, the richest decile hold 88% of the world’s wealth, and the top percentile alone account
for 50.0% of global assets.
The decile breakdown by regions has a number of interesting features. China has few
representatives at the bottom of the global wealth distribution, and relatively few at the top also,
but dominates the upper middle section, accounting for 40% of the worldwide membership of
deciles 6–8. In contrast, residents of India are heavily concentrated in the lower wealth strata,
accounting for over a quarter of people in the bottom half of the distribution.
Table 3-4 shows that residents of Latin America are spread quite evenly across the global
wealth spectrum. The Asia-Pacific region (excluding China and India) mimics the global pattern
more closely still, although the apparent uniformity of the Asia-Pacific region masks a
substantial degree of polarization between high-income countries, such as Hong Kong, Japan
and Singapore, and lower income countries, such as Bangladesh, Indonesia, Pakistan and
Vietnam. In fact, when high-income countries are excluded from the Asia-Pacific group, the
wealth pattern within the remaining countries resembles that of India. Residents of Africa are
also heavily concentrated at the bottom end of the wealth spectrum: half of all African adults
occupy the bottom two global wealth deciles. In sharp contrast, North America and Europe are
heavily skewed toward the top tail, together accounting for 63% of adults in the top 10%, and
an even higher percentage of the top percentile.
Table 3-5 lists the countries that have gained or lost the most number of members of the global
top decile and percentile during the year to mid-2015. It also reports changes in the number of
millionaires during the past twelve months.
Table 3-6 reports the numbers for mid-2015. While the base of the wealth pyramid is occupied
by people from all countries at various stages of their lifecycles, HNW and UHNW individuals
are heavily concentrated in particular regions and countries, and tend to share more similar
lifestyles, participating in the same global markets for luxury goods, even when they reside in
different continents. The wealth portfolios of these individuals are also likely to be more similar,
with more of a focus on financial assets and, in particular, equity holdings in public companies
traded in international markets.
For mid-2015, we estimate that 33.6 million HNW adults have wealth between USD 1 million
and USD 50 million, of whom the vast majority (29.8 million) fall within the USD 1–5 million
range. North America accounts for the greatest number, significantly above Europe, which turn
hosts roughly double the number in Asia-Pacific countries, excluding China and India. China,
Latin America, India and Africa together account for less than 7% of all HNW individuals.
UHNW individuals with net assets above USD 50 million now number 123,800 worldwide by
our calculations. Among individual countries, the United States leads with 48%of UHNW adults.
China has recently moved into second place, but with only 8% of the total is a distant second.
Table 3-3: Membership of top wealth groups for selected countries, 2015
Over USD 100,000 Over USD 1 million
Country/region Number of adults Number of adults
% %
(thousands) (thousands)
United States 95,049 24.84 15,656 46.43
Japan 50,799 13.28 2,126 6.30
United Kingdom 27,334 7.14 2,364 7.01
Italy 24,622 6.43 1,126 3.34
Germany 24,459 6.39 1,525 4.52
China 24,378 6.37 1,333 3.95
France 24,225 6.33 1,791 5.31
Canada 13,739 3.59 984 2.92
Australia 11,289 2.95 961 2.85
Spain 9,434 2.47 360 1.07
Taiwan 7,409 1.94 414 1.23
Korea 6,508 1.70 313 0.93
Netherlands 6,027 1.58 282 0.84
Belgium 4,812 1.26 278 0.83
Switzerland 3,150 0.82 667 1.98
Sweden 2,712 0.71 520 1.54
Austria 2,693 0.70 194 0.58
Brazil 2,655 0.69 168 0.50
India 2,598 0.68 185 0.55
Mexico 2,562 0.67 122 0.36
Norway 2,083 0.54 205 0.61
Singapore 2,026 0.53 142 0.42
New Zealand 1,945 0.51 282 0.84
Denmark 1,838 0.48 194 0.57
Ireland 1,627 0.43 83 0.25
Finland 1,559 0.41 71 0.21
Greece 1,492 0.39 58 0.17
Indonesia 1,487 0.39 98 0.29
Israel 1,430 0.37 88 0.26
United Arab Emirates 1,306 0.34 59 0.18
Hong Kong 1,278 0.33 107 0.32
Portugal 1,216 0.32 51 0.15
Turkey 1,025 0.27 74 0.22
Saudi Arabia 979 0.26 50 0.15
South Africa 962 0.25 50 0.15
Poland 939 0.25 43 0.13
Russia 931 0.24 92 0.27
Colombia 874 0.23 37 0.11
Chile 681 0.18 44 0.13
Kuwait 506 0.13 28 0.08
Philippines 489 0.13 35 0.10
Czech Republic 488 0.13 28 0.08
Malaysia 477 0.12 31 0.09
Qatar 441 0.12 32 0.10
Peru 418 0.11 28 0.08
Africa 2,509 0.66 126 0.37
Asia-Pacific 91,737 23.97 4,931 14.63
China 24,378 6.37 1,333 3.95
Europe 143,830 37.59 10,011 29.69
India 2,598 0.68 185 0.55
Latin America 8,757 2.29 485 1.44
North America 108,835 28.44 16,646 49.37
World 382,645 100.00 33,717 100.00
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods.
Table 3-4: Percentage membership of global wealth deciles and top percentiles by country of residence, 2015
Global wealth decile Top
Country
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10% 5% 1%
Albania 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.08 0.09 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Algeria 0.40 0.21 0.46 0.66 0.72 0.70 0.86 0.73 0.39 0.05 0.02 0.01
Angola 0.15 0.06 0.14 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.31 0.36 0.27 0.06 0.03 0.02
Antigua and Barbuda 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Argentina 0.60 0.57 0.79 0.91 0.77 0.85 0.68 0.49 0.28 0.09 0.06 0.05
Armenia 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Australia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.50 2.69 3.52 3.10
Austria 0.28 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.23 0.70 0.65 0.60
Azerbaijan 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.11 0.16 0.25 0.33 0.30 0.05 0.01 0.00
Bahamas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bahrain 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.00
Bangladesh 2.26 4.11 4.70 4.06 3.60 1.87 1.17 0.61 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Barbados 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Belarus 0.34 0.34 0.17 0.34 0.22 0.11 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Belgium 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.34 1.17 1.50 0.94
Belize 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Benin 0.10 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bolivia 0.13 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.13 0.10 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00
Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.10 0.13 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.00
Botswana 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Brazil 2.86 1.44 2.83 3.56 3.60 3.46 3.90 3.82 2.68 0.87 0.53 0.49
Brunei 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00
Bulgaria 0.12 0.05 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.08 0.30 0.25 0.04 0.01 0.00
Burkina Faso 0.33 0.50 0.33 0.28 0.13 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Burundi 0.45 0.38 0.12 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cambodia 0.20 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.25 0.15 0.10 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cameroon 0.28 0.45 0.42 0.38 0.33 0.20 0.13 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
Canada 0.53 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.08 0.14 0.23 0.55 1.21 3.00 3.89 3.14
Cape Verde 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Central African Republic 0.18 0.15 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Chad 0.30 0.33 0.25 0.17 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Chile 0.27 0.05 0.07 0.12 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.47 0.74 0.22 0.14 0.13
China 0.06 2.70 9.25 9.24 22.83 36.12 46.96 45.98 31.12 8.19 4.69 3.95
Colombia 0.46 0.20 0.42 0.63 0.74 0.83 0.87 1.18 0.94 0.31 0.16 0.11
Comoros 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Congo, Dem. Rep. 3.31 2.34 0.78 0.36 0.14 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Congo, Rep. 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Costa Rica 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.02
Cote d'Ivoire 0.32 0.48 0.46 0.40 0.35 0.23 0.14 0.10 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Croatia 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.11 0.21 0.04 0.01 0.00
Cyprus 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.02
Czech Republic 0.16 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.53 0.16 0.10 0.08
Denmark 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.12 0.44 0.56 0.62
Djibouti 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dominica 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ecuador 0.14 0.06 0.16 0.22 0.25 0.24 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.04 0.02 0.01
Table 3-4: Percentage membership of global wealth deciles and top percentiles by country of residence, 2015, continued
Global wealth decile Top
Country
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10% 5% 1%
Egypt 1.14 0.90 1.79 2.03 2.05 1.58 0.89 0.58 0.33 0.10 0.07 0.07
El Salvador 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.14 0.09 0.02 0.01 0.00
Equatorial Guinea 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Eritrea 0.08 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Estonia 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.00
Ethiopia 3.41 3.57 1.50 0.61 0.21 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Fiji 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Finland 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.17 0.42 0.34 0.22
France 0.87 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.09 0.22 0.38 0.89 2.06 5.54 7.87 5.79
Gabon 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00
Gambia 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Georgia 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.14 0.13 0.03 0.01 0.00
Germany 2.49 0.07 0.10 0.17 0.25 0.39 0.62 1.17 2.47 6.33 6.06 4.78
Ghana 0.79 0.97 0.57 0.33 0.17 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Greece 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.06 0.11 0.28 0.74 0.53 0.26 0.18
Grenada 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Guinea 0.27 0.33 0.26 0.16 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Guinea-Bissau 0.09 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Guyana 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Haiti 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hong Kong 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.42 0.40 0.28 0.30
Hungary 0.15 0.02 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.61 0.15 0.05 0.02
Iceland 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.05
India 20.65 35.48 30.72 29.94 21.09 12.77 7.18 4.69 2.64 0.84 0.54 0.53
Indonesia 3.39 4.39 5.55 4.98 4.60 4.09 3.87 1.33 1.21 0.48 0.30 0.28
Iran 1.14 1.40 1.76 1.73 1.84 1.61 0.98 0.69 0.26 0.02 0.00 0.00
Ireland 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.16 0.37 0.38 0.26
Israel 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.14 0.30 0.42 0.29 0.26
Italy 0.72 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.11 0.26 0.72 2.51 5.86 6.13 3.59
Jamaica 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00
Japan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.33 0.78 0.71 1.07 6.61 12.31 12.39 7.16
Jordan 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.13 0.03 0.01 0.00
Kazakhstan 0.28 0.52 0.45 0.46 0.26 0.15 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01
Kenya 0.74 1.11 0.80 0.81 0.49 0.25 0.18 0.11 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Korea 0.77 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.19 0.31 0.52 1.19 2.85 2.23 1.21 0.94
Kuwait 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.08
Kyrgyzstan 0.08 0.04 0.10 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
Laos 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Latvia 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.02 0.01 0.00
Lebanon 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.02
Lesotho 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Liberia 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Libya 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.03
Lithuania 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.15 0.03 0.01 0.00
Luxembourg 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.05
Macedonia 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
Table 3-4: Percentage membership of global wealth deciles and top percentiles by country of residence, 2015, continued
Global wealth decile Top
Country
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10% 5% 1%
Madagascar 1.12 0.76 0.25 0.08 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Malawi 1.11 0.40 0.09 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Malaysia 0.22 0.18 0.14 0.36 0.46 0.57 0.58 0.80 0.52 0.16 0.10 0.09
Maldives 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mali 0.32 0.41 0.31 0.20 0.09 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Malta 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01
Mauritania 0.05 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mauritius 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01
Mexico 0.86 0.72 0.20 1.20 1.53 2.04 2.14 3.32 2.91 0.88 0.48 0.37
Moldova 0.09 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mongolia 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00
Montenegro 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Morocco 0.42 0.26 0.53 0.69 0.60 0.72 0.65 0.43 0.25 0.07 0.04 0.04
Mozambique 0.76 0.78 0.50 0.21 0.12 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Myanmar 0.82 1.51 1.34 1.44 1.03 0.59 0.34 0.19 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
Namibia 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00
Nepal 0.49 0.87 0.75 0.66 0.44 0.26 0.18 0.10 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Netherlands 0.49 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.13 0.57 1.42 1.41 0.91
New Zealand 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.46 0.68 0.95
Nicaragua 0.07 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Niger 0.35 0.47 0.36 0.21 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Nigeria 3.24 4.50 3.14 3.06 1.67 0.89 0.50 0.32 0.18 0.05 0.03 0.03
Norway 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.52 0.73 0.65
Oman 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.08 0.14 0.07 0.03 0.02
Pakistan 2.08 1.27 3.07 4.27 3.54 4.04 2.59 1.64 0.71 0.06 0.01 0.00
Panama 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.01
Papua New Guinea 0.08 0.05 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00
Paraguay 0.07 0.03 0.08 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.00
Peru 0.27 0.13 0.29 0.43 0.50 0.49 0.64 0.74 0.44 0.14 0.09 0.08
Philippines 1.23 1.30 1.73 1.91 1.65 1.71 1.28 0.88 0.50 0.16 0.10 0.10
Poland 0.60 0.22 0.34 0.52 0.56 0.62 0.38 1.46 1.33 0.32 0.17 0.13
Portugal 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.14 0.31 0.65 0.43 0.24 0.16
Qatar 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.08 0.12 0.09 0.07
Romania 0.35 0.22 0.30 0.36 0.36 0.20 0.56 0.70 0.34 0.08 0.04 0.03
Russia 4.00 4.07 3.11 2.17 3.44 2.54 1.54 1.10 0.71 0.28 0.21 0.25
Rwanda 0.39 0.37 0.21 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Samoa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sao Tome and Principe 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Saudi Arabia 0.08 0.18 0.10 0.08 0.25 0.36 0.51 0.73 1.03 0.33 0.18 0.15
Senegal 0.17 0.27 0.26 0.23 0.21 0.13 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Serbia 0.18 0.14 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.20 0.28 0.21 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00
Seychelles 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sierra Leone 0.17 0.20 0.13 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Singapore 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.21 0.52 0.56 0.43
Slovakia 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.31 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00
Slovenia 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.14 0.10 0.03 0.00
Solomon Islands 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Table 3-4: Percentage membership of global wealth deciles and top percentiles by country of residence, 2015, continued
Global wealth decile Top
Country
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10% 5% 1%
South Africa 0.60 0.47 0.68 0.77 0.74 0.73 0.73 0.77 0.77 0.32 0.18 0.15
Spain 0.70 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.85 3.02 3.10 1.65 1.11
Sri Lanka 0.30 0.20 0.40 0.51 0.43 0.48 0.34 0.23 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00
St. Kitts and Nevis 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
St. Lucia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sudan 1.10 1.50 1.08 0.82 0.40 0.19 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Suriname 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Swaziland 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sweden 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.21 0.40 0.70 0.78 1.53
Switzerland 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.14 0.37 0.77 0.97 1.74
Syria 0.34 0.64 0.56 0.58 0.37 0.20 0.11 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Taiwan 0.00 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.37 1.08 1.93 1.62 1.25
Tajikistan 0.09 0.13 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Tanzania 1.11 1.46 1.06 0.65 0.31 0.15 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Thailand 1.10 1.83 1.70 1.38 1.71 1.24 0.72 0.48 0.29 0.10 0.07 0.07
Togo 0.12 0.17 0.13 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Tonga 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Trinidad and Tobago 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00
Tunisia 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.13 0.17 0.21 0.22 0.35 0.26 0.06 0.03 0.02
Turkey 0.89 0.38 0.89 1.28 1.41 1.36 1.78 1.78 1.03 0.33 0.21 0.21
Turkmenistan 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.13 0.25 0.11 0.05 0.02
Uganda 1.09 1.10 0.63 0.28 0.14 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ukraine 3.73 2.20 0.78 0.35 0.16 0.10 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01
United Arab Emirates 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.24 0.37 0.27 0.18
United Kingdom 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.34 0.12 0.21 0.19 0.35 2.21 6.63 8.74 7.59
United States 10.20 0.17 0.25 0.42 0.61 0.95 1.54 3.55 9.59 23.75 27.33 43.35
Uruguay 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.11 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.02
Vanuatu 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Venezuela 0.41 0.54 0.66 0.65 0.66 0.53 0.30 0.20 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.02
Vietnam 1.32 0.83 1.68 2.16 1.88 2.10 1.62 1.18 0.51 0.05 0.01 0.00
West Bank and Gaza 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Yemen 0.25 0.14 0.33 0.45 0.38 0.46 0.35 0.22 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00
Zambia 0.37 0.35 0.24 0.17 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Zimbabwe 0.15 0.22 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.19 0.11 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Africa 25.73 26.73 18.92 15.49 10.95 7.84 5.82 4.68 2.95 0.85 0.47 0.38
Asia-Pacific 19.06 22.45 28.29 30.10 28.04 25.84 21.20 17.39 21.51 23.95 22.25 15.81
China 0.06 2.70 9.25 9.24 22.83 36.12 46.96 45.98 31.12 8.19 4.69 3.95
Europe 16.74 7.78 5.79 5.34 6.37 5.83 6.06 10.70 21.34 36.47 39.13 31.39
India 20.65 35.48 30.72 29.94 21.09 12.77 7.18 4.69 2.64 0.84 0.54 0.53
Latin America 7.03 4.67 6.76 9.44 10.04 10.50 11.01 12.46 9.64 2.94 1.69 1.43
North America 10.73 0.18 0.26 0.45 0.69 1.09 1.77 4.09 10.81 26.76 31.24 46.51
World 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Minimum wealth 132 474 987 1,870 3,210 5,443 9,435 19,861 68,845 185,336 759,927
Wealth share (%) -0.33 0.06 0.13 0.26 0.47 0.81 1.38 2.59 6.97 87.65 76.6 50.01
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods.
Table 3-5: Main gains and losses in global wealth distribution, adults (thousand), 2014–2015
Wealth above USD 1 m Global top 10% Global top 1%
Country 2014 2015 Change Country 2014 2015 Change Country 2014 2015 Change
World 36,123 33,718 -2,405 World 469,934 477,082 7,148 World 46,993 47,709 716
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Table 3-6: High net worth individuals by country and region, 2015
Wealth range (USD)
Country/region
1–5 m 5–10 m 10–50 m 50–100 m 100–500 m 500–1 bn over 1 bn
Number of adults
United States 13,390,718 1,423,974 782,061 39,210 18,108 1,024 513
United Kingdom 2,170,170 127,651 60,451 3,544 1,683 99 51
Japan 1,994,004 91,969 37,163 1,719 702 33 14
France 1,649,314 94,098 43,706 2,486 1,157 66 34
Germany 1,380,521 92,008 47,313 3,149 1,627 109 62
China 1,158,156 102,014 63,255 5,571 3,461 305 218
Italy 1,029,925 62,856 30,398 1,851 897 55 29
Canada 900,511 54,552 26,248 1,589 771 47 25
Australia 884,608 50,655 23,458 1,341 625 36 18
Switzerland 577,651 56,123 29,304 2,313 1,345 108 71
Sweden 474,368 29,680 14,420 922 473 31 18
Taiwan 366,164 28,976 16,766 1,322 763 60 39
Spain 322,987 22,905 12,273 870 467 33 20
Korea 275,792 22,464 13,241 1,079 636 52 35
Netherlands 259,219 15,319 7,162 426 203 12 6
New Zealand 266,357 11,111 4,166 182 71 3 1
Belgium 261,027 12,057 4,897 228 93 4 2
Norway 187,417 11,681 5,568 348 171 11 6
Austria 175,728 12,016 5,901 388 199 13 7
Denmark 176,841 11,046 5,388 346 174 11 6
India 156,005 16,000 11,118 1,142 792 81 67
Brazil 143,640 13,804 9,056 873 577 55 43
Singapore 125,365 9,924 5,729 455 263 21 14
Mexico 107,631 8,703 5,105 418 246 20 13
Hong Kong 88,157 10,105 7,370 841 625 71 64
Indonesia 83,537 8,204 5,416 549 371 37 29
Russia 73,878 9,210 7,295 910 725 90 90
Israel 76,162 6,998 4,366 405 259 24 17
Ireland 75,110 5,320 2,722 191 101 7 4
Turkey 61,996 6,410 4,465 461 321 33 27
Finland 64,479 4,426 2,263 159 84 6 3
United Arab Emirates 53,052 3,877 2,002 151 82 6 4
Greece 52,048 3,653 2,004 143 77 6 3
Portugal 45,910 3,315 1,616 121 65 5 3
South Africa 43,417 3,719 2,181 195 119 10 7
Saudi Arabia 43,423 3,602 2,190 185 111 9 6
Chile 37,453 3,644 2,418 234 156 15 12
Poland 38,259 3,113 1,676 140 81 6 4
Colombia 32,689 2,414 1,338 105 59 4 3
Philippines 29,531 3,003 2,105 218 151 16 13
Qatar 29,574 1,828 758 64 34 2 1
Malaysia 26,600 2,600 1,697 169 113 11 9
Peru 24,129 2,403 1,608 164 111 11 9
Czech Republic 24,470 2,215 1,388 128 82 7 5
Kuwait 24,455 2,047 1,314 114 70 6 4
Thailand 20,947 2,305 1,655 186 136 15 13
Egypt 19,347 2,005 1,345 142 99 10 8
Luxembourg 16,414 1,293 615 50 28 2 1
Argentina 15,517 1,602 1,009 106 72 7 6
Morocco 11,474 1,006 687 67 44 4 3
Table 3-6: High net worth individuals by country and region, 2015, continued
Wealth range (USD)
Country/region
1–5 m 5–10 m 10–50 m 50–100 m 100–500 m 500–1 bn over 1 bn
Number of adults
North America 14,296,827 1,478,888 808,497 40,811 18,885 1,072 538
Europe 9,108,864 583,728 288,576 18,918 9,868 696 439
Asia-Pacific 4,509,560 270,031 136,244 9,664 5,485 450 324
China 1,158,156 102,014 63,255 5,571 3,461 305 218
Latin America 418,767 38,290 23,998 2,276 1,477 139 107
India 156,005 16,000 11,118 1,142 792 81 67
Africa 109,525 10,149 6,035 596 389 37 29
World 29,757,703 2,499,100 1,337,722 78,978 40,357 2,781 1,722
Percentage of adults (in %)
North America 48.0 59.2 60.4 51.7 46.8 38.5 31.2
Europe 30.6 23.4 21.6 24.0 24.5 25.0 25.5
Asia-Pacific 15.2 10.8 10.2 12.2 13.6 16.2 18.8
China 3.9 4.1 4.7 7.1 8.6 11.0 12.7
Latin America 1.4 1.5 1.8 2.9 3.7 5.0 6.2
India 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.4 2.0 2.9 3.9
Africa 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7
World 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
4.1 Introduction
Throughout the world, the size, health and resources of the middle class are seen as key factors
in determining the speed and sustainability of economic development. The middle class is often
at the heart of political movements and new consumption trends. It is also a major source of the
business people and entrepreneurs who aim to satisfy the new demands, and of the funding
needed to support their businesses, particularly in the early stages. This chapter looks at the
changing circumstances of the middle class since the turn of the century, within countries and
regions as well as globally.
The “middle class” category is not easy to define. At one time, the label was usually attached to
households whose head was a professional or a manager, or who worked in a skilled white
collar or blue collar job. More recently, it has become common to define the middle class in
terms of a range of household income, which offers a comfortable lifestyle, but not an overly
generous one; in other words a range which excludes the poor and those vulnerable to poverty
at the bottom end, but also those at the top with the highest incomes.
We proceed here in a similar vein, but break new ground by defining the middle class in terms
of a wealth band rather than an income range. This has many attractions. The values and
aspirations of the middle class have always been linked to ownership of property, which gives
the middle class a stake in the future of the country, and the freedom to view issues from a
longer term perspective. Furthermore, access to modest amounts of assets allows households
to tide themselves over when misfortune strikes; in other words, it ensures less vulnerability to
spells of poverty. An income-based definition of the middle class misses these elements of
freedom and security. It suggests, for example, that a spell of unemployment can cause middle
class status to evaporate. A wealth-based definition on the other hand conforms better with the
widespread view that middle class membership is resilient to temporary setbacks.
For a variety of reasons – including the iconic status of the middle class in North America – the
United States is chosen as the benchmark country. Specifically, a middle class adult in the
United States is defined to be one with wealth between USD 50,000 and USD 500,000 valued
at mid-2015 prices. The lower bound could perhaps be justified by noting that USD 50,000
equates to roughly two years median earnings, and hence provides substantial protection
against work interruptions, income shortfalls, or emergency expenditures. Similarly, the upper
threshold of USD 500,000 roughly equates to the amount of capital a person close to
retirement age needs to purchase an annuity paying the median wage for the remainder of their
life. However, we do not aim to provide a detailed justification of our chosen cut-offs, which are
intended to be indicative rather than precise. Other reasonable values for the lower and upper
bounds do not appear to change the broad patterns and conclusions documented below.
For the years before 2015, the middle class wealth bounds for the United States were adjusted
downwards using the US CPI. For other countries, the IMF series of purchasing power parity
(PPP) values was used to derive middle class wealth bounds equivalent in local purchasing
power terms. Nowadays prices in the United States are often lower than in other advanced
economies, so applying the PPP adjustment sometimes produces lower bounds for middle class
wealth above USD 50,000 (see Table 1). Among Nordic countries, for example, the cut-offs in
2015 range from USD 51,400 for Finland and USD 52,600 for Sweden to USD 57,300 for
Denmark and USD 58,200 for Norway. Applying our methodology suggests that an adult in
Switzerland must own at least USD 72,900 in assets to belong to the middle class.
Countries with lower wealth per capita tend to have lower prices, so for them the middle class
threshold is correspondingly reduced, as Table 1 shows. To be a member of the middle class in
2015 according to our methodology, an adult needs at least USD 28,000 in Brazil, Chile and
China; USD 22,000 in South Africa and Turkey; USD 18,000 in Malaysia, Russia and Thailand;
and just USD 13,700 in India.
For each country the upper limit of middle class wealth is ten times the lower bound. This allows
the members of the middle class to be identified, and their number and wealth to be estimated.
Our results indicate that 664 million adults belong to the global middle class in 2015, equivalent
to 14% of the total adult population. A further 96 million (2% of world adults) have wealth
above the upper bound of our middle class wealth range.
Across regions, the middle class is most prevalent in North America, where 39% of adults
qualify, followed by Europe, where the proportion is one third. As Table 2 shows, the share then
drops sharply, to 15% for the Asia-Pacific region (excluding China and India), around 11% in
China and Latin America, and just 3% in Africa and India. Including those with wealth above the
middle class cut-off raises the North America incidence rate to 51%, but makes little difference
to the numbers for China, Latin America, Africa or India.
Despite high incidence in North America, the region contains only 105 million middle class
adults (16% of the global total), significantly less than the 171 million members (26%) in the
Asia-Pacific region (excluding China and India) or the 194 million residents of Europe (29% of
the world). In fact, the number of middle class adults in North America has fallen below the
number in China (see Table 3). Adding those with wealth beyond our middle class range raises
the North American share from 16% to 18% and overtakes the number in China, but otherwise
makes little difference to the regional ranking.
The middle class is so closely associated with North America – and with the United States in
particular – that some of our results for individual countries may come as a surprise. The pattern
displayed in Table 3 shows that China now has the largest number of middle class adults by a
wide margin – 109 million compared to 92 million in the United States (although this ranking is
reversed when those above the middle class upper threshold are added). Eleven other countries
have more than ten million middle class citizens, ranging from Japan with 62 million, through
France, Italy, Germany, India, Spain and the United Kingdom, with 20-30 million, and Australia,
Brazil, Canada and Korea, with 10-17 million members each.
Although North America is the region with the largest share of middle class adults, among
countries the highest middle class incidence rates are found elsewhere. Half of all adults in the
United States own more than USD 50,000, but only 38% fall within our middle class range.
This is a relatively low percentage among advanced economies (see Table 4). Over 50% of
adults qualify as middle class in Ireland, the Netherlands and New Zealand, while over 55%
qualify in Italy, Japan, Spain, Taiwan, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom. The
middle class incidence rate exceeds 60% in Belgium and Singapore, and is highest of all in
Australia, where 66% of adults are in the middle class and 80% belong to the middle class or
beyond.
The net worth of the middle class in 2015 amounted to USD 80.7 trillion worldwide, or 32% of
global wealth. Adults with wealth beyond the middle class threshold accounted for a further
USD 150 trillion, bringing the total wealth of the middle class and beyond to USD 231 trillion, or
92% of global wealth. Thus the 1 in 6 adults who belong to the middle class and beyond own
the vast bulk of global assets. The same picture emerges within regions and countries, with few
instances of countries where the middle class and beyond own less than two thirds of total
wealth, regardless of the size of the middle class. India is a borderline case: only 3% of adults
have wealth above the middle class minimum, but the group accounts for 64% of total
household wealth (see Table 5). The situation in Africa as a whole is almost identical.
Other interesting conclusions emerge from the breakdown by region and country. While North
America is the region with the highest incidence of middle class adults, its share of middle class
wealth is not only lower than for the world as a whole, but the lowest of all regions, including
India. More surprising is the finding that in North America – alone among regions – the
population share of the middle class exceeds their share of wealth: in other words, the middle
class as a group have less than average wealth (see Table 2). In fact the average wealth of
middle class adults in North America is barely half the average for all adults. In contrast, middle
class wealth per adult in Europe is 130% of the regional average; the middle class in China are
three times better off in wealth terms than the country as a whole; and the average wealth of
the middle class in both India and Africa is ten times the level of those in the rest of the
population. The reason for this unexpected result is evident from Table 2: in North America the
size and wealth of the group beyond the middle class is large enough to depress the relative
position of the middle class.
A shortfall of the wealth share of the middle class below its population share is also evident in
many individual countries outside North America, including every one of the G7 nations. Table 6
shows that the shortfall is most acute in Switzerland, Singapore and the United States; but in
Australia, Hong Kong and Sweden too, the mean wealth of the middle class is more than one
third lower than the average for the whole population. Again, the reason why the middle class in
these countries has less than its “fair share” of wealth is because those beyond the middle class
are sufficiently numerous and wealthy to depress the middle class share. In contrast, for middle
and low-income countries – such as Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and Mexico – the share of
the middle class wealth exceeds its population share (see Table 6). This difference signals that
in such countries members of the middle class are not “in the middle”. Rather, they are toward
the top of the distribution and there are relatively few people above them. The same is true for
the world as a whole.
Our results show an expansion this century in the number of middle class adults from 524
million in 2000 to 664 million in 2015, a rise of 140 million or 27%. This is a substantial
increase by any standard, even allowing for the rise in population over this period. However, it
underestimates the increase in middle class membership because it disregards the net increase
in the number of those who advance beyond our middle class range. To accommodate the latter
it is best to look first at the change in the total number in or beyond the middle class, and then
split the total into those who remain in the middle class and those who progress further.
Table 7 indicates that the number of adults with wealth above the middle class lower bound has
increased by 178 million this century, a rise of 31%. Most of the new entrants have remained
within the middle class band, but 38 million extra adults are now found beyond this range. Each
of the regions contributed to the rise in both categories, led by the Asia-Pacific region, which
added 42 million adults to the middle class ranks and a further 10 million to the number beyond
the middle class. China added 43 million new members, of which a smaller proportion (5 million)
progressed higher. In contrast, about one third of the 34 million new middle class members in
Europe advanced beyond the middle class range, and almost 40% of the 27 million new
members in North America moved on.
The financial crisis had a significant impact on the size of the middle class and beyond. Every
region contributed to the massive expansion during 2000-2007 when the global stock absorbed
267 million new members; and every region also contributed to the decline during 2007-2008
when the number in the middle class and beyond shrank by 115 million. However, the overall
picture is dominated by China where the middle class and beyond added 102 million members
during 2000–2007 and then shed 67 million members in the following year. Our figures
suggest that the middle class and beyond grew by nine million in China between 2008 and
2014, and that middle class numbers are still well below the pre-crisis peak. In fact, middle
class numbers have not recovered since 2008 in any region except North America, where the
core middle class shrank by 2.6 million in 2007–2008, but has subsequently expanded by 9.5
million. In Africa, Europe and Latin America, middle class numbers have continued to fall in the
period since 2008 although the number of adults beyond the middle class wealth range has
risen recently in Latin America and Africa.
A similar pattern over time emerges for individual countries, although a few escaped the
downturn in middle class numbers during the financial crisis. These include Poland and Taiwan,
both of which had substantial gains in middle class membership since 2000, alongside
Australia, Canada, France, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, the United Kingdom and, most notably,
China and the United States whose gains far outstrip all other countries. At the other end of the
scale, the middle class contracted in size this century in five countries: Argentina, Egypt,
Greece, Russia and Turkey. In each case, the middle class expanded between 2000 and 2007,
then shrank as a result of the financial crisis and continued to shed members from 2008
onwards. After trebling in size by 2007, Russia has lost more middle class members since 2008
than any other country. Like Greece and Turkey, the middle class in Russia is only a little
smaller now than in 2000. But our estimates suggest that the middle class in Egypt is half the
size it was at the turn of the century, while the middle class in Argentina has shed two thirds of
its membership.
In all regions and in almost all countries, the wealth of the middle class and beyond has grown
strongly this century. Globally, the wealth of those above the lower middle class threshold has
more than doubled, from USD 108.3 trillion in 2000 to USD 230.9 trillion in 2015. In Africa it
has grown by 140% and in India by 280%, while China has experienced a six-fold increase
(see Table 8). Part of the increase reflects population growth and erosion of purchasing power
by inflation. But after controlling for these factors there remains significant growth in the wealth
of those above the middle class cut-off.
Further inspection of the data yields two important observations. First, the increase in middle
class wealth occurred principally before the financial crisis. Total global wealth for the middle
class and beyond rose by USD 95.7 trillion between 2000 and 2007, then dropped by USD
30.3 trillion in 2007-8, before rising by USD 57.2 trillion from 2008 onwards. Thus about 80%
of the rise this century in the wealth of the middle class and beyond occurred before 2007. The
pattern within each region is broadly similar, although the Asia-Pacific region (excluding China
and India) saw no decline in wealth during 2007–2008; and in Africa and Europe, the wealth of
the middle class and beyond has not recovered to pre-crisis levels. The same pattern is also
evident across countries, although most of the rise in the wealth of the middle class and beyond
in the United States occurred after the financial crisis, and the same is true of Singapore,
Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and Thailand.
The second noteworthy observation is that the rise in wealth of the middle class and beyond has
gone largely to those with wealth above our upper middle class threshold despite the much
smaller population size. For the world as a whole, the split is more than 2:1 in favour of those
beyond the middle class, and in North America the split is more than 4:1. In fact, in every region
during 2000–2015, the rise in the aggregate wealth of the middle class was less than that at
higher wealth levels, and this was true of most countries, the exceptions being Colombia,
Greece, Mexico and Poland where the split was roughly 60:40 in favour of the core middle
class.
These two factors help explain the trends evident in Table 9, which plots the share of total
wealth owned by the middle class in each region. An increase in the size of the middle class,
combined with a relatively even distribution of wealth gains, kept the share of middle class
wealth fairly stable during the early years of the century. During the financial crisis of 2007–
2008, the size of the middle class declined, but its average wealth fell by a smaller factor than
that experienced at higher wealth levels. As a consequence, the wealth share of the middle
class fell in Africa, China and India, where the decline in middle class numbers was most
severe, and rose in Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America, where the middle class
contraction was more modest.
From 2008 onwards, wealth growth has not allowed middle class numbers to keep pace with
population growth in the developing world. Furthermore, the distribution of wealth gains has
shifted in favor of those at higher wealth levels. These two factors have combined to produce a
decline in the share of middle class wealth in every region since 2007, and for the entire 2000–
2015 period. The percentage decline since 2008 lies in a narrow range (9-13%) for most
regions, but is higher in Latin America (16%) and highest of all in North America (17%). This
pattern is repeated in most countries and provides support for the claim that the middle classes
have been squeezed in recent years. Some of the squeezing in certain countries has been due
to higher levels of personal debt. However, it is worth noting that some of the squeezing has
also been done by former members of the middle class. Many people rose out of the middle
class during 2000-2015. In the United States, for example, the number of adults beyond the
middle class rose by almost 50% between 2000 and 2015, with most of the newcomers no
doubt coming from the middle class. Thus, to an extent, the middle class has been the victim of
its own success.
Comparisons of the middle class across many countries will almost certainly need to be based
on data like income or wealth that are widely available. The wealth perspective has many
attractions in our view, but there are also limitations. One of the most important is that data
constraints prevent us from applying different wealth bounds to different age groups. Our
bounds are likely to be less appropriate for the young than the middle aged, and they may also
be questionable for the very old. This lays us open to the suggestion that the exclusion of young
people with wealth less than USD 50,000 is the reason why just 38% of adults qualify as
middle class in the United States. However, we believe this criticism carries little weight.
Australia and the United States have similar demography, for example. Yet 66% of adults in
Australia qualify as middle class on our methodology. This suggests that high wealth inequality is
the principal reason for the low middle class numbers found here for the United States rather
than the exclusion of too many young or old people.
Some commentators recommend including the value of state pensions in the definition of
wealth, which would lead to a rise in the size of the middle class, especially in high income
countries. However, we do not favor this option. People have legal ownership of their private
pensions. In contrast, social security wealth can be changed by government policy. Large
private pensions give people a source of security and independence that makes them solidly
middle class. Those who depend on the state for their retirement income are not in the same
category
A case could be made for expanding the middle class wealth band, reducing the lower bound in
mid-2015 below USD 50,000, and/or raising the upper limit above USD 500,000. We have
experimented with the broader middle class band from USD 30,000 to USD 1 million and found
no substantive qualitative differences with the findings documented above using the narrower
USD 50,000 – USD 500,000 band. By way of illustration, Table 10 compares the trends in the
size of the middle class in the United States and China during 2000-2015. Use of the broad
wealth band suggests that the Chinese middle class has been much bigger than the US middle
class over the entire period, and peaked at more than double the size; but otherwise the
patterns revealed by the narrow and broad bands are similar.
Further options are available for studying middle class trends at a global level. Our approach
chooses wealth to be the measure of resources and employs an absolute criterion. Other
authors have employed a relative concept based on income. Thurow (1987), for example,
specified the bounds as 75% and 125% of median income in the United States. Birdsall,
Graham and Pettinato (2000) applied a similar approach to developing countries. Parker (2009)
offers an alternative proposal where the lower bound of the middle class is the income level at
which a given percentage of income is available for discretionary spending rather than food and
shelter. More recently still, it has become popular to set the lower bound according to the
probability (e.g. 10% or more) of falling into poverty (López-Calva and Ortiz-Juarez, 2014;
Corral, Molini and Oseni, 2015).
The decision to adopt an absolute or relative definition may not affect the fraction of the
population considered to be middle class in a single country or at a single point in time; but it will
affect perceived changes over time and differences across countries. Over time, most countries
experience growth in per capita income or wealth. With an absolute approach, growth will push
some people up into the middle class and remove others from it at the top end. Growth is
therefore likely to raise the percentage of population in the middle class in low-income
countries, since there are so many low-income people who can rise into the middle class, but to
reduce the middle class fraction in high income countries through exit at the top. Under the
relative approach, if inequality is not greatly affected by growth, then the percentage of middle
class individuals may change very little. By the same token, the percentage of the population
classified as middle class might not vary much across countries under a relative definition, but
could differ considerably with an absolute definition if, say, median incomes differed a lot.
An example of the absolute approach to defining the income middle class was provided by
Milanovic and Yitzhaki (2002), who appear to have been the first to estimate the size of the
global middle class. Milanovic and Yitzhaki pointed out that, in world terms, the G7 countries
could be considered “rich” and took the mean income in Italy – the lowest income country
among the G7 nations – as the upper bound on middle class income. At the other end, they felt
that Brazil had the lowest average income that should be considered middle class. On this basis,
they found that 8% of the world’s population lived in middle-class countries in 1993, 76% were
in poor countries and 16% were in rich countries. Applying the same cut-offs to people rather
than countries indicated that 11% were middle class, 78% were poor and 11% were rich.
Either way, the world’s middle class was quite small. 1 It is almost as though the world was split
between rich and poor groups and lacked a middle class.
The Milanovic and Yitzhaki approach has been used to analyze changes in the middle class over
time. The Economist (2009) reports, for example, that using their absolute cut-offs, 2% of
India’s population was middle class in 1995 but the fraction increased to 5% by 2005. The
Milanovic and Yitzhaki middle class income band equated to about USD 12–50 per person per
day. Some have argued that a more reasonable lower bound for the middle class in India would
be USD 6 per person per day. Making that apparently small change would have large
consequences: between 1995 and 2005 the fraction of the population with income between
USD 6 and USD 12 per day in India rose from 18% to 41% (The Economist, 2009). Ravallion
(2009) went further by arguing for a middle class income band of USD 2 - 13 per person per
day, similar to the USD 2–10 band employed by Banerjee and Duflo (2008). Given that USD 2
per person per day is widely used as the poverty line in low income countries, while USD 13 per
person per day is the U.S. poverty line, this approach clearly views the middle class in
developing countries as being different from the middle class in high income countries. As a
consequence, a large fraction of the population in developing countries is classified as middle
class and its growth is impressive: Ravallion’s criterion suggests that there were 1.5 billion
middle class people in developing countries in 1995, but 2.6 billion, or “half the world”, by
2005. This contrasts sharply with the Milanovic and Yitzhaki result that the middle class scarcely
exists on the world stage. Thus, the choice between absolute and relative concepts can lead to
very different conclusions about the size and growth of the middle class.
The approach adopted Milanovic and Yitzhaki (2002) is perhaps closest in spirit to our own,
although it is based on income rather than wealth. Their discovery that 11% of the world’s
population were middle class in 1993 based on their income seems strikingly consistent – given
economic growth in the intervening years – with our conclusion that 14% of the world’s adults
are middle class in 2015 based on their wealth. The alternative approaches of Ravallion (2009)
and others generate much larger numbers of middle class members, but they focus entirely on
the middle class in developing countries, and use a developing country perspective to establish
upper and lower bounds on middle class income. We are interested in the global middle class,
which accounts for the difference in methods and results.
1
The conclusion could be different in the future. Using a dynamic distributional simulation model, Bussolo, De
Hoyos and Medvedev (2008) predict that by the year 2030 the fraction of the world’s population that would be
middle class under the Milanovic and Yitzhaki definition would grow to 17%.
This chapter has used our unique set of wealth data to investigate the changing fortunes of the
middle class this century in all regions and countries of the world. We defined the middle class
as adults in the United States with wealth between USD 50,000 and USD 500,000 in 2015
dollars, and in other countries as those having wealth in the same range in terms of local
purchasing power. Wealth is a good basis for identifying the middle class because it is
necessary for the financial freedom and security that are its hallmarks. We find that the middle
class in 2015 accounts for 14% of world adults and 32% of world wealth. When those beyond
the middle class are added, the larger group makes up 16% of the adult population and holds
92% of total wealth.
The size and wealth of the middle class varies greatly across countries, ranging from 3% of the
adult population in India to 66% of adults in Australia. Surprisingly, only 38% of adults in the
United States qualify as middle class according to our criterion, a much lower percentage than
the 50% to 60% figure found in most high income countries. The reason lies in high wealth
inequality in the United States, which spreads most of the population out beyond the middle
class boundaries.
The middle class in the United States is also unusual in having a particularly low share of the
country’s wealth, which at 19.6% is considerably less than its share of the adult population.
This is because the middle class wealth share is squeezed by the exceptionally high wealth of
the 12% of adults who are beyond the middle class. While the wealth share of the middle class
is less than its population share in many other high income countries, the imbalance is seldom
as great as in the United States. Among regions, North America is the only one where the
wealth share of the middle class does not exceed its adult population share. In other words,
North America is the only region where the middle class has less than average wealth.
Since the turn of the century, the number of adults in the middle class and beyond has
increased considerably, up from 524 million to 664 million. Their wealth has also risen
impressively, by USD 122.6 trillion. However, the upward trend has not been smooth. There
was a sharp drop in 2007-2008 in both middle class numbers and wealth. Numbers have not
yet returned to the 2007 level in any region except North America. In Argentina and Egypt, they
remain significantly below the level at the turn of the century. The wealth of the middle class and
beyond now exceeds its 2007 value in the Asia-Pacific region, China, India, Latin America and
North America, but has not fully recovered in Africa or Europe. Meanwhile, the wealth of those
beyond the middle class has risen more rapidly; as a consequence, the share of middle class
wealth has fallen in all regions since 2008, and in all regions except China over the period from
2000 to 2015.
There are notable differences in trends across countries and regions, which generate interesting
comparisons, such as that between China and India. In China the number of middle class adults
grew by 38 million between 2000 and 2015, and their wealth rose by USD 5.6 trillion. As a
consequence, there are now more global middle class members in China (109 million) than
there are in the United States (92 million). In contrast, India added only 6.7 million adults to the
middle class, and middle class wealth rose by just USD 1.2 trillion. This divergence in
experiences is partly due to faster overall wealth growth in China, and partly because the
populous mid-portion of the Chinese wealth distribution is moving into the global middle class,
whereas it is still far from doing so in India.
Table 4-2: Share of middle class adults and wealth 2015 by region
middle class beyond middle class
share of adults (%) share of wealth (%) share of adults (%) share of wealth (%)
North America 38.8 21.0 12.1 77.6
Europe 33.1 40.6 5.2 56.1
Asia-Pacific 15.1 41.6 1.9 49.9
China 10.7 32.2 0.6 35.4
Latin America 10.6 35.1 0.7 38.5
Africa 3.3 32.1 0.2 30.6
India 3.0 22.6 0.2 41.4
World 13.9 32.3 2.0 60.1
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Table 4-3: Number of middle class adults (million) 2015 by region and country
number of adults percentage of number of adults percentage of
(thousand) world (thousand) world
Table 4-4: Middle class share of all adults (%) 2015, by country and region
middle class middle class
middle class middle class
and above and above
Australia 66.1 80.3 Germany 42.4 50.0
Singapore 62.3 78.3 Denmark 39.5 50.0
Belgium 62.1 74.4 Sweden 39.4 50.9
Italy 59.7 68.3 United States 37.7 50.0
Japan 59.5 68.6 Saudi Arabia 33.1 35.2
Taiwan 59.4 74.6 Czech Republic 26.5 28.1
United Kingdom 57.4 69.6 Chile 22.3 23.8
Norway 56.4 68.6 Poland 19.3 20.3
United Arab Emirates 56.4 64.2 Mexico 17.1 18.1
Spain 55.8 59.6 Malaysia 16.7 17.9
Netherlands 54.1 61.5 Colombia 15.3 16.2
Ireland 50.3 57.7 South Africa 13.7 14.8
New Zealand 50.3 72.2 China 10.7 11.3
France 49.2 61.7 Peru 10.3 11.1
Canada 47.8 58.3 Turkey 9.9 10.7
Greece 47.2 50.0 Brazil 8.1 8.7
Finland 45.6 50.0 Egypt 5.0 5.4
Portugal 44.6 47.3 Philippines 4.8 5.2
Korea 44.6 47.5 Indonesia 4.4 5.0
Switzerland 44.5 58.5 Russia 4.1 4.6
Hong Kong 44.4 49.5 Argentina 4.0 4.3
Austria 44.0 51.9 Thailand 3.7 4.0
Israel 42.5 46.2 India 3.0 3.2
North America 38.8 50.9 Latin America 10.6 11.3
Europe 33.1 38.3 Africa 3.3 3.5
Asia-Pacific 15.1 17.0 India 3.0 3.2
China 10.7 11.3
World 13.9 15.9
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Table 4-5: Wealth holdings of middle class 2015, by country and region
middle class middle class and beyond
total wealth share of wealth of share of world total wealth share of wealth of share of world
(USD bn) country/region (%) wealth (%) (USD bn) country/region (%) wealth (%)
United States 16,845 19.6 6.7 84,824 98.7 33.9
Japan 9,724 49.0 3.9 19,138 96.5 7.7
China 7,342 32.2 2.9 15,412 67.6 6.2
United Kingdom 6,188 39.7 2.5 15,255 97.8 6.1
France 4,901 38.6 2.0 12,437 98.0 5.0
Germany 4,758 39.9 1.9 11,630 97.5 4.6
Italy 4,746 47.3 1.9 9,781 97.5 3.9
Canada 2,680 39.0 1.1 6,702 97.5 2.7
Australia 2,490 40.3 1.0 6,094 98.7 2.4
Spain 2,200 52.4 0.9 3,945 94.0 1.6
Korea 1,682 47.4 0.7 3,289 92.7 1.3
Netherlands 1,182 49.7 0.5 2,373 99.8 0.9
Taiwan 1,063 29.6 0.4 3,547 98.8 1.4
Belgium 1,023 46.7 0.4 2,154 98.4 0.9
Mexico 791 40.4 0.3 1,492 76.2 0.6
India 780 22.6 0.3 2,206 64.0 0.9
Brazil 754 31.0 0.3 1,789 73.5 0.7
Switzerland 696 19.9 0.3 3,405 97.5 1.4
Austria 515 38.5 0.2 1,308 97.9 0.5
Norway 513 42.1 0.2 1,268 104.1 0.5
Sweden 504 22.0 0.2 2,223 96.9 0.9
Europe 30,468 40.6 12.2 72,554 96.7 29.0
North America 19,534 21.0 7.8 91,559 98.6 36.6
Asia-Pacific 19,127 41.6 7.6 42,079 91.5 16.8
China 7,342 32.2 2.9 15,412 67.6 6.2
Latin America 2,621 35.1 1.0 5,495 73.6 2.2
Africa 834 32.1 0.3 1,627 62.7 0.7
India 780 22.6 0.3 2,206 64.0 0.9
World 80,706 32.3 32.3 230,933 92.4 92.4
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Table 4-6: Ratio of share of middle class wealth to share of middle class adults 2015
share of share of ratio share wealth/ share of share of ratio share wealth/
adults (%) wealth (%) share adults adults (%) wealth (%) share adults
Switzerland 44.5 19.9 0.45 Czech Republic 26.5 41.0 1.6
Singapore 62.3 30.6 0.49 Chile 22.3 35.8 1.6
Taiwan 59.4 29.6 0.50 Hungary 39.8 69.6 1.8
United States 37.7 19.6 0.52 Malaysia 16.7 33.3 2.0
New Zealand 50.3 27.4 0.54 Slovakia 28.5 58.6 2.1
Sweden 39.4 22.0 0.56 Uruguay 13.1 28.6 2.2
Hong Kong 44.4 26.3 0.59 Tunisia 22.4 49.7 2.2
Australia 66.1 40.3 0.61 Poland 19.3 43.4 2.3
Luxembourg 61.3 39.5 0.64 Mexico 17.1 40.4 2.4
United Kingdom 57.4 39.7 0.69 Colombia 15.3 42.6 2.8
Qatar 57.2 39.9 0.70 Turkey 9.9 27.8 2.8
Kuwait 53.6 38.5 0.72 South Africa 13.7 38.6 2.8
Belgium 62.1 46.7 0.75 Peru 10.3 30.1 2.9
Norway 56.4 42.1 0.75 China 10.7 32.2 3.0
United Arab Emirates 56.4 42.9 0.76 Iraq 14.1 49.9 3.5
France 49.2 38.6 0.78 Romania 10.5 37.9 3.6
Italy 59.7 47.3 0.79 Brazil 8.1 31.0 3.8
Canada 47.8 39.0 0.82 Algeria 11.9 46.0 3.9
Japan 59.5 49.0 0.82 Russia 4.1 16.8 4.1
Cyprus 36.1 30.5 0.84 Morocco 6.9 30.1 4.4
Austria 44.0 38.5 0.88 Egypt 5.0 25.2 5.0
Ireland 50.3 44.7 0.89 Philippines 4.8 25.6 5.3
Netherlands 54.1 49.7 0.92 Indonesia 4.4 24.0 5.5
Denmark 39.5 37.1 0.94 Serbia 6.6 36.5 5.5
Spain 55.8 52.4 0.94 Thailand 3.7 22.6 6.1
Germany 42.4 39.9 0.94 Pakistan 5.7 35.2 6.2
Israel 42.5 40.2 0.95 Argentina 4.0 26.5 6.6
Korea 44.6 47.4 1.06 Vietnam 4.9 33.6 6.9
Finland 45.6 50.9 1.12 India 3.0 22.6 7.5
Greece 47.2 53.6 1.14 Iran 4.0 31.1 7.8
Portugal 44.6 52.9 1.19 Bangladesh 1.1 15.1 13.7
Saudi Arabia 33.1 44.2 1.34 Nigeria 1.1 21.2 19.3
Slovenia 52.2 80.1 1.53 Ukraine 0.8 16.9 21.1
North America 38.8 21.0 0.54 Latin America 10.6 35.1 7.5
Europe 33.1 40.6 1.23 India 3.0 22.6 9.7
Asia-Pacific 15.1 41.6 2.75 Africa 3.3 32.1
China 10.7 32.2 3.01
World 13.9 32.3 2.32
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Table 4-7: Change in number of middle class adults 2000-2015, for regions and selected countries
middle class and beyond middle class beyond middle class
period 2000 2015 2000-15 2000-15 2000-7 2007-8 2008-15 2000-15 2000-15
number number change change change change change change change
million million million % million million million million million
China 71.8 115.1 43.3 60.3 102.0 -67.3 8.5 38.5 4.8
United States 99.7 121.7 22.0 22.1 11.9 -6.8 17.0 12.9 9.1
India 17.8 25.5 7.7 43.6 12.5 -5.5 0.7 6.8 1.0
France 22.7 29.9 7.2 31.8 6.2 -0.2 1.2 3.6 3.7
Japan 64.4 71.5 7.1 11.1 2.4 0.0 4.8 4.2 2.9
Korea 12.4 18.5 6.1 49.7 5.7 -1.1 1.6 5.4 0.7
Mexico 7.6 13.7 6.1 80.4 7.5 -0.3 -1.1 5.8 0.3
United Kingdom 28.6 33.9 5.3 18.4 3.2 -1.2 3.3 3.0 2.2
Canada 11.4 16.1 4.7 41.6 2.4 -0.3 2.6 3.2 1.5
Australia 9.7 13.6 3.9 40.2 2.3 0.0 1.6 2.4 1.5
Poland 2.3 6.2 3.8 163.4 2.4 0.6 0.8 3.7 0.2
Taiwan 10.1 13.8 3.7 36.4 1.6 0.6 1.5 1.8 1.9
Spain 18.9 22.4 3.5 18.2 5.2 -2.1 0.3 3.2 0.3
Colombia 1.8 5.1 3.3 182.7 1.6 0.0 1.7 3.1 0.2
Greece 4.7 4.6 -0.1 -1.9 1.1 -0.4 -0.8 -0.1 0.0
Turkey 6.0 5.7 -0.3 -5.3 3.1 -2.0 -1.4 -0.4 0.1
Russia 5.6 5.0 -0.6 -10.3 11.1 -2.5 -9.2 -0.7 0.1
Argentina 3.9 1.2 -2.7 -68.8 1.5 -1.1 -3.1 -2.6 -0.1
Egypt 5.7 2.9 -2.7 -48.2 3.0 -2.6 -3.1 -2.7 -0.1
Asia-Pacific 140.7 191.8 51.2 36.4 59.4 -15.5 7.3 41.6 9.6
China 71.8 115.1 43.3 60.3 102.0 -67.3 8.5 38.5 4.8
Europe 189.5 223.9 34.5 18.2 46.2 -9.3 -2.4 23.5 11.0
North America 111.1 137.8 26.7 24.1 14.3 -7.1 19.5 16.1 10.7
Latin America 31.7 45.4 13.8 43.5 21.2 -2.9 -4.5 12.8 0.9
India 17.8 25.5 7.7 43.6 12.5 -5.5 0.7 6.8 1.0
Africa 19.1 19.9 0.7 3.8 11.5 -7.5 -3.2 0.4 0.3
World 581.6 759.5 177.9 30.6 267.0 -115.1 26.0 139.7 38.2
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Table 4-8: Change in total wealth of middle class 2000-2015, for regions and selected countries
middle class and beyond middle class beyond middle class
period 2000 2015 2000-15 2000-15 2000-7 2007-8 2008-15 2000-15 2000-15
change change change change change change change
wealth wealth
in wealth in wealth in wealth in wealth in wealth in wealth in wealth
USD bn USD bn USD bn % USD bn USD bn USD bn USD bn USD bn
United States 42,298 84,824 42,526 100.5 21,433 -12,494 33,587 7,098 35,428
China 2,145 15,412 13,267 618.4 8,284 -2,775 7,757 5,634 7,633
United Kingdom 6,947 15,255 8,308 119.6 7,651 -5,268 5,925 2,692 5,616
France 4,370 12,437 8,067 184.6 9,381 -1,234 -81 2,622 5,444
Germany 5,612 11,630 6,018 107.2 6,706 -530 -158 2,108 3,910
Australia 1,383 6,094 4,711 340.5 3,203 -960 2,467 1,735 2,975
Canada 2,368 6,702 4,334 183.0 3,347 -1,388 2,375 1,604 2,730
Korea 928 3,289 2,361 254.3 1,849 -891 1,404 1,026 1,335
Switzerland 1,243 3,405 2,162 173.9 948 -7 1220 410 1752
Spain 1,918 3,945 2,027 105.7 3,513 -1,069 -417 1,068 958
Taiwan 1,721 3,547 1,826 106.1 503 256 1,067 146 1,681
India 575 2,206 1,631 283.7 1,544 -538 625 468 1,163
Sweden 801 2,223 1,422 177.5 877 -375 921 284 1137
Russia 220 1,044 824 374.2 1,877 -387 -667 137 687
Mexico 724 1,492 768 106.1 959 -336 145 442 326
Singapore 317 1,080 763 240.7 334 3 426 214 549
Japan 18,444 19,138 694 3.8 -896 3,758 -2,168 -420 1,114
Turkey 356 775 419 117.7 989 -439 -131 103 316
Poland 165 567 401 242.8 356 -44 89 243 158
Colombia 100 484 384 383.8 208 -21 197 222 162
Philippines 72 364 293 407.7 94 -22 221 113 179
Greece 457 678 221 48.3 709 -216 -272 127 94
Thailand 64 255 191 300.5 82 -31 140 58 133
Egypt 179 251 72 40.1 168 -72 -24 -7 79
Argentina 432 178 -254 -58.7 4 -79 -179 -181 -73
Asia-Pacific 25,586 42,079 16,493 64.5 10,981 113 5,400 5,145 11,348
China 2,145 15,412 13,267 618.4 8,284 -2,775 7,757 5,634 7,633
Europe 32,256 72,554 40,299 124.9 45,891 -11,854 6,262 14,565 25,734
North America 44,683 91,559 46,877 104.9 24,788 -13,887 35,976 8,705 38,172
Latin America 2,413 5,495 3,082 127.7 2,916 -853 1,019 1,369 1,713
India 575 2,206 1,631 283.7 1,544 -538 625 468 1,163
Africa 686 1,627 941 137.1 1,281 -523 182 421 520
World 108,344 230,933 122,589 113.2 95,685 -30,316 57,221 36,307 86,282
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Table 4-9: Percentage of wealth owned by middle class adults 2000-2015, by region
North
Year Asia-Pacific Europe Latin America World China Africa India
America
2000 50.4 47.2 36.9 37.9 36.6 37.1 26.8 23.8
2001 50.5 47.7 37.4 37.9 37.3 38.3 26.7 24.1
2002 50.8 48.4 38.4 39.5 41.2 37.5 27.0 25.0
2003 50.2 47.7 38.7 39.4 44.5 38.9 27.7 24.1
2004 49.9 47.1 39.2 38.8 43.4 38.5 27.0 23.2
2005 49.1 45.9 39.8 37.0 41.0 37.7 26.7 22.3
2006 48.0 44.6 41.1 36.7 43.3 38.1 26.7 21.6
2007 47.6 44.5 42.0 37.6 44.3 38.5 26.4 22.7
2008 48.8 46.1 41.6 39.3 37.1 36.0 24.9 25.4
2009 48.2 45.6 40.6 39.3 38.9 35.6 24.7 25.7
2010 46.3 44.3 39.4 38.0 38.2 34.7 24.5 25.3
2011 46.5 44.6 38.1 37.9 36.0 34.5 24.1 25.2
2012 45.2 43.7 37.5 36.6 34.7 33.9 23.6 24.3
2013 43.1 42.8 36.6 34.4 33.6 33.0 23.2 21.9
2014 42.9 42.0 36.2 34.1 33.0 32.6 23.0 21.9
2015 41.6 40.6 35.1 32.3 32.2 32.1 22.6 21.0
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
Table 4-10: Number of middle class adults (million) in China and USA 2000-2015
China narrow China broad USA narrow USA broad
2000 70.3 158.3 79.0 102.7
2001 75.0 166.1 78.9 103.1
2002 99.1 195.7 78.2 102.5
2003 126.8 234.2 81.8 106.4
2004 124.3 231.7 84.6 109.5
2005 111.7 215.4 84.2 112.3
2006 140.7 257.2 84.3 114.6
2007 167.5 294.6 86.4 114.8
2008 102.4 201.6 83.8 109.9
2009 129.8 245.5 84.7 111.1
2010 132.5 250.2 86.7 113.5
2011 115.8 223.3 88.1 115.1
2012 109.3 211.3 91.7 119.0
2013 107.8 207.4 91.4 124.5
2014 106.0 203.4 91.9 125.2
2015 108.8 206.9 91.9 127.6
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories.
We look first at the relative importance of financial versus non-financial assets in the average
household portfolio. Expressed as a percentage of gross household assets, the pattern clearly
differs markedly between poorer and richer countries and regions, as can be seen in Table 5-1,
which shows the breakdown for the countries where we have the best data. In developing
countries, for example India and Indonesia, it is not unusual for 80% or more of total assets to
be held in the form of non-financial assets, including housing, farms and small business assets.
This pattern is also associated with the relative under-development of financial institutions in
many lower income countries.
As countries develop – and make the transition to a market economy – the importance of non-
financial assets tends to decline. An interesting example is provided by China, where the share
of financial assets touched 50% in 2010 and rose to 52% in 2015. Another example is
provided by Singapore, a country much further along the development path, but still
nevertheless seeing the share of financial assets in household portfolios continuing to rise –
from 44% in 2000 to 54% in 2015. In the richest countries, financial assets typically account
for more than half of household wealth. An important example is the United States, where 60%
to 70% of household assets have been held in financial form since 2000 (although the share is
somewhat inflated by the US practice of classifying all business equity as a financial asset).
There are interesting exceptions to this general pattern. Robust house price rises drove the
share of non-financial assets above 60% in France and Italy by 2008 where it has remained
since in France, and below which it has fallen only slightly in Italy, to 59%. The share of non-
financial assets also rose in the United Kingdom, from 44% in 2000 to 55% in 2007, although
it has since fallen back to 47%. In the developing world, South Africa is a strong outlier, having
an exceptionally high share of financial assets: the share of 71% in 2015 exceeds that found in
both the United States and Japan. This high share reflects, on the one hand, the advanced
development of South Africa’s financial institutions including its private pensions, and on the
other hand, relatively low house prices.
Table 5-2 provides more detail on the composition of financial assets for a greater number of
countries, showing the breakdown into three categories: currency and deposits (liquid assets);
equities (all shares and other equities held directly by households); and other financial assets. In
most countries the reserves of life insurance companies and pension funds form the largest
component of “other financial assets” – these reserves comprise equities and other financial
assets that are in effect being held on behalf of the household sector.
The composition of financial assets differs considerably across countries. One interesting aspect
is that equities held directly are not always a large component of household financial wealth,
even in countries with very active financial markets. In the United Kingdom and Japan, for
example, equities account for less than 15% of total financial assets. In contrast, they make up
44% of financial assets in both Sweden and the United States. To calculate the overall
percentage of the household portfolio held in equities, equities held indirectly via insurance
policies and pension plans would need to be added to the total of equities held directly.
However, this is not possible since available household balance sheet data do not show the
composition of assets held in insurance and pension reserves. If the purpose were to find out
the total exposure of the household sector to stock market risk, it is also not clear that this
exercise would provide the answer. Households have explicit or implicit guarantees on their
rights to most insurance and pension benefits, so that the risk characteristics of the latter
generally differ from those of the assets held in the reserves.
Where equities account for more of the portfolio, there is less room for liquid assets or other
financial assets. The strongest negative association is between equities and other financial
assets, perhaps because other financial assets are larger where private pension systems are
more highly developed and may tend to crowd out privately held equities. A good example of
this phenomenon is found in Australia, where only 17% of the average portfolio is in equities vs.
an average of 26% for the countries in Table 5-2, but other financial assets have a share of
61%, well above the average figure of 37%. A similar pairing of below-average equities and
above-average other financial assets is seen, in most years, in ten countries in Table 5-2,
including France, Germany, Switzerland, Norway, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The
opposite case, of above average equities and below average other financial assets is found in
11 countries, which include most of the transition economies as well as Belgium, Finland,
Portugal and Spain. The negative association between equities and liquid assets is weaker, but
shows up in countries like Japan where liquid assets are 53% of the portfolio versus 14% for
equities, and at the opposite end of the scale the United States, with only 15% in liquid form
versus 44% in equities.
There are also interesting differences across country types. The typical portfolio in the well-
established high-income market economies has less liquid assets than average, equities at
about the average level, and other financial assets somewhat above average. Emerging market
countries have less in both equities and other financial assets than the established high income
countries, and therefore a higher share in liquid assets than seen in the typical rich country. The
transition countries have more in liquid assets than either the high income countries or emerging
market economies, perhaps reflecting the fact that their financial systems have had less time to
develop.
While the financial crisis of 2007-2008 is receding into the past, it was a landmark event for
household wealth, bringing an abrupt decline in most personal fortunes and a change in
household behavior and wealth performance in most countries. In light of these aspects, it is
interesting to examine how the overall composition of personal wealth and, in particular, the
proportion of financial assets to total household assets has changed over the past decade. A
decline in the relative importance of financial assets was seen in a number of countries in 2008,
for example in Denmark, Italy, Switzerland and notably China. In other countries, the credit crisis
depressed both property prices and share values, so the share of financial assets was more
stable; little change was seen in 2008 in the share of financial assets in the United Kingdom
and the United States. Only in the Czech Republic and New Zealand did the relative size of
financial assets actually increase in 2008.
Longer term, the share of financial assets does not often appear to change dramatically. In
France, strong property price increases in the period since 2000 have reduced the share from
45% to 37%, and a somewhat similar effect is seen in Italy, where the share fell from 47% to
42%. Elsewhere, however, effects generally seem to be mostly short term. The United States
showed a relative decline in financial assets from 2000 to 2005, for example, but then with a
booming stock market the share rebounded. Its rise was only halted temporarily by the financial
crisis. Now the share is 69%, significantly above its 2000 level of 66%. Japan shows a rise in
the proportion of financial assets during 2000−2006, a decline during the financial crisis, and a
small subsequent increase; the share is now slightly above the level of 2005. Among developing
nations, the financial asset share in India has been relatively stable, but took an upward jump in
2010 in Indonesia and has since remained higher than formerly although gradually declining.
The importance of debt has also changed over the last decade. For many countries, including
the United Kingdom and the United States, there was a significant rise in the period leading up
to the financial crisis and a decline thereafter. However, this experience is not universal. In
Japan, for example, the debt ratio was steady from 2000 to 2008, and in Germany it fell over
that period. What is common to most OECD countries, however, is that the debt ratio fell after
the financial crisis. So where debt had not risen before the crisis, it nonetheless tended to fall
afterwards – from 16% to 14% in Japan, for example, and from 15% to 13% in Germany.
Contrasting post-crisis results are seen in a few high income countries where the debt ratio held
steady, as in France, or even rose a little, as in Australia. Trends also differed in rapidly
developing countries like China, India and Indonesia, which saw their debt ratios rise throughout
the decade, seemingly unaffected by the global financial crisis.
5.4 Conclusion
Table 5-1: Assets and debts as percentage of gross household wealth for selected countries by year
Year
2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Australia Financial wealth 37.2 33.8 34.7 36.7 34.8 34.6 32.9 34.5 40.2 40.2 39.8 40.1
Australia Non-financial wealth 62.8 66.2 65.3 63.3 65.2 65.4 67.1 65.5 59.8 59.8 60.2 59.9
Australia Debts 15.6 18.2 18.2 18.3 19.5 21.2 20.3 20.8 20.4 19.7 21.2 21.0
Canada Financial wealth 62.1 58.0 57.8 56.9 53.4 55.4 55.8 54.5 53.7 54.2 54.8 55.4
Canada Non-financial wealth 37.9 42.0 42.2 43.1 46.6 44.6 44.2 45.5 46.3 45.8 45.2 44.6
Canada Debts 16.3 17.1 17.0 17.5 19.7 19.6 19.5 20.3 19.5 18.9 18.1 18.0
China Financial wealth 44.7 44.8 47.0 49.4 40.1 48.2 50.0 49.4 49.5 48.7 48.6 52.1
China Non-financial wealth 55.3 55.2 53.0 50.6 59.9 51.8 50.0 50.6 50.5 51.3 51.4 47.9
China Debts 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.7 3.5 4.1 5.4 6.1 6.8 7.3 7.9
Czech Republic Financial wealth 41.1 43.9 43.6 43.5 43.6 45.7 42.3 44.2 45.9 44.7 45.7 46.3
Czech Republic Non-financial wealth 58.9 56.1 56.4 56.5 56.4 54.3 57.7 55.8 54.1 55.3 54.3 53.7
Czech Republic Debts 11.2 19.1 12.3 14.8 16.7 17.6 16.1 15.6 15.6 15.1 14.9 14.9
Denmark Financial wealth 49.8 55.4 57.0 56.0 51.9 53.7 55.6 57.0 58.3 59.2 58.8 60.2
Denmark Non-financial wealth 50.2 44.6 43.0 44.0 48.1 46.3 44.4 43.0 41.7 40.8 41.2 39.8
Denmark Debts 28.1 30.1 31.2 32.6 36.1 35.8 34.0 34.1 32.3 29.2 29.2 27.7
France Financial wealth 45.0 34.8 34.6 34.6 33.7 36.3 34.6 34.3 35.3 36.1 36.8 37.3
France Non-financial wealth 55.0 65.2 65.4 65.4 66.3 63.7 65.4 65.7 64.7 63.9 63.2 62.7
France Debts 12.2 10.9 10.9 11.1 11.8 12.5 10.9 11.2 11.7 12.0 11.1 11.1
Germany Financial wealth 45.4 45.8 45.4 45.0 43.3 45.1 45.8 43.4 43.5 43.6 42.3 43.2
Germany Non-financial wealth 54.6 54.2 54.6 55.0 56.7 54.9 54.2 56.6 56.5 56.4 57.7 56.8
Germany Debts 19.5 17.1 16.2 15.2 15.0 14.8 14.3 14.3 13.8 13.4 13.4 13.2
Hungary Financial wealth 35.3 42.6 43.8 44.8 44.2 44.5 45.4 43.8 44.4 45.7 49.0 50.5
Hungary Non-financial wealth 64.7 57.4 56.2 55.2 55.8 55.5 54.6 56.2 55.6 54.3 51.0 49.5
Hungary Debts 4.1 12.6 13.6 14.9 17.8 17.3 17.9 17.9 15.1 13.8 12.5 11.2
India Financial wealth 12.4 12.6 13.7 13.7 12.2 15.7 16.6 15.1 14.7 14.0 14.3 13.9
India Non-financial wealth 87.6 87.4 86.3 86.3 87.8 84.3 83.4 84.9 85.3 86.0 85.7 86.1
India Debts 2.8 3.8 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.1 4.8 5.3 5.6 6.2 6.6 7.4
Indonesia Financial wealth 7.7 8.5 7.3 9.2 7.0 11.2 16.8 16.4 15.8 14.6 14.5 13.9
Indonesia Non-financial wealth 92.3 91.5 92.7 90.8 93.0 88.8 83.2 83.6 84.2 85.4 85.5 86.1
Indonesia Debts 1.9 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.2 3.9 4.3 4.9 5.2 6.2
Italy Financial wealth 47.3 42.2 41.3 40.1 37.5 37.9 38.2 37.4 37.6 40.3 40.8 41.5
Italy Non-financial wealth 52.7 57.8 58.7 59.9 62.5 62.1 61.8 62.6 62.4 59.7 59.2 58.5
Italy Debts 6.6 8.3 8.4 8.7 9.2 8.4 8.6 9.8 9.7 9.5 9.3 9.3
Japan Financial wealth 53.3 60.6 60.6 59.1 58.4 60.5 57.9 59.0 60.0 61.5 60.6 61.1
Japan Non-financial wealth 46.7 39.4 39.4 40.9 41.6 39.5 42.1 41.0 40.0 38.5 39.4 38.9
Japan Debts 15.6 15.4 15.2 15.3 15.7 15.2 14.0 14.1 13.7 13.4 13.1 13.6
Netherlands Financial wealth 72.6 68.9 68.7 68.7 64.5 67.3 68.8 69.5 71.6 70.3 71.0 72.0
Netherlands Non-financial wealth 27.4 31.1 31.3 31.3 35.5 32.7 31.2 30.5 28.4 29.7 29.0 28.0
Netherlands Debts 20.8 27.3 28.0 28.4 32.0 30.9 30.6 30.8 30.1 30.8 29.4 28.4
New Zealand Financial wealth 51.6 43.3 44.7 42.9 44.4 44.0 45.2 46.4 45.9 45.0 44.9 43.3
New Zealand Non-financial wealth 48.4 56.7 55.3 57.1 55.6 56.0 54.8 53.6 54.1 55.0 55.1 56.7
New Zealand Debts 13.7 13.6 13.6 14.4 15.8 15.4 15.5 15.0 14.7 14.4 14.4 14.1
Singapore Financial wealth 43.7 52.6 53.4 51.1 48.8 52.5 48.7 49.7 50.5 51.7 52.8 54.1
Singapore Non-financial wealth 56.3 47.4 46.6 48.9 51.2 47.5 51.3 50.3 49.5 48.3 47.2 45.9
Singapore Debts 19.8 18.8 17.1 15.3 15.8 14.9 14.9 15.7 16.0 16.3 16.5 16.9
South Africa Financial wealth 73.8 69.1 72.7 72.2 69.5 70.6 70.1 70.3 72.3 73.5 73.0 70.9
South Africa Non-financial wealth 26.2 30.9 27.3 27.8 30.5 29.4 29.9 29.7 27.7 26.5 27.0 29.1
South Africa Debts 16.9 16.6 16.1 17.4 19.8 18.5 19.1 19.6 19.3 17.9 18.4 18.7
Switzerland Financial wealth 62.2 61.8 62.1 60.7 56.6 58.0 58.1 56.2 55.8 56.0 56.0 55.4
Switzerland Non-financial wealth 37.8 38.2 37.9 39.3 43.4 42.0 41.9 43.8 44.2 44.0 44.0 44.6
Switzerland Debts 18.6 20.4 19.9 19.4 20.7 20.1 20.2 20.0 19.7 19.4 19.7 20.4
United Kingdom Financial wealth 56.2 47.2 46.7 45.3 45.2 47.3 47.3 49.9 49.6 50.0 51.7 52.6
United Kingdom Non-financial wealth 43.8 52.8 53.3 54.7 54.8 52.7 52.7 50.1 50.4 50.0 48.3 47.4
United Kingdom Debts 13.2 16.4 16.9 16.9 19.0 17.3 16.7 18.0 16.9 15.9 15.6 14.8
United States Financial wealth 66.4 60.3 61.9 64.2 62.7 65.9 67.1 68.3 68.8 70.7 70.3 68.8
United States Non-financial wealth 33.6 39.7 38.1 35.8 37.3 34.1 32.9 31.7 31.2 29.3 29.7 31.2
United States Debts 14.7 17.0 17.3 18.2 21.5 20.8 19.6 18.3 16.6 14.6 14.6 14.3
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods and categories
Table 5-2: Percentage composition of gross financial wealth by country and year
Year
2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Australia Liquid assets 19.2 20.7 19.6 17.9 21.3 25.7 26.0 26.4 22.9 22.1 22.4
Australia Equities 19.9 18.0 17.8 17.9 14.9 12.5 11.4 8.1 16.2 17.3 16.5
Australia Other financial assets 60.9 61.3 62.6 64.2 63.8 61.8 62.6 65.5 60.9 60.6 61.1
Austria Liquid assets 51.2 47.9 46.8 47.5 51.1 50.0 48.3 46.2 45.1 44.7 41.3
Austria Equities 23.6 23.0 23.4 22.0 16.9 18.0 10.7 15.1 24.4 25.7 27.5
Austria Other financial assets 25.1 29.1 29.8 30.5 32.0 31.9 41.0 38.8 30.5 29.6 31.2
Belgium Liquid assets 21.4 29.1 28.5 29.4 32.8 31.1 31.7 32.8 31.9 31.6 29.8
Belgium Equities 43.9 37.9 40.6 39.4 31.1 34.5 33.9 19.8 32.2 34.3 38.5
Belgium Other financial assets 34.7 33.0 30.9 31.2 36.1 34.3 34.4 47.5 35.9 34.0 31.7
Brazil Liquid assets 16.2 16.9 17.6 19.9 19.9
Brazil Equities 33.2 37.0 38.8 31.2 33.6
Brazil Other financial assets 50.5 46.1 43.7 48.9 46.5
Bulgaria Liquid assets 55.3 57.8 48.0 32.0 39.1 35.8 41.8 40.7 42.5
Bulgaria Equities 37.0 30.7 41.2 59.3 43.5 47.2 37.8 40.8 38.3
Bulgaria Other financial assets 7.8 11.5 10.9 8.8 17.4 17.0 20.3 18.5 19.1
Canada Liquid assets 19.4 19.5 19.0 19.4 23.6 22.8 22.8 24.1 24.9 24.2 23.3
Canada Equities 34.2 35.6 36.5 37.6 33.0 34.5 35.5 33.7 36.3 37.7 38.4
Canada Other financial assets 46.4 44.9 44.5 43.0 43.4 42.7 41.7 42.2 38.7 38.2 38.3
Chile Liquid assets 12.6 12.6 12.2 14.6 12.3 11.4 13.3 14.2 14.5 13.5
Chile Equities 31.1 28.9 28.2 29.4 27.2 26.4 26.0 25.5 24.6 23.9
Chile Other financial assets 56.3 58.4 59.6 56.0 60.4 62.2 60.7 60.3 60.9 62.6
Colombia Liquid assets 30.7 40.0 36.4 37.2 39.9 20.1 24.3 23.2 24.2 24.0
Colombia Equities 4.1 5.1 5.7 7.9 5.7 8.4 3.2 8.8 6.5 6.7
Colombia Other financial assets 65.2 54.9 57.9 54.9 54.4 71.5 72.5 68.0 69.3 69.3
Croatia Liquid assets 57.6 56.2 49.9 54.2 58.4 54.5 58.4 58.7 57.4 57.1
Croatia Equities 25.4 26.6 33.4 28.2 23.3 25.9 19.7 17.6 17.6 17.6
Croatia Other financial assets 17.0 17.2 16.6 17.6 18.3 19.6 21.9 23.7 24.9 25.3
Cyprus Liquid assets 48.9 59.5 53.6 53.5 66.1 64.4 64.7 66.6 60.6 58.1 63.9
Cyprus Equities 34.4 24.7 31.4 33.1 18.8 20.9 19.4 16.3 14.3 14.3 14.3
Cyprus Other financial assets 16.7 15.8 15.0 13.4 15.1 14.6 15.9 17.1 25.1 27.6 21.8
Czech Republic Liquid assets 60.0 55.3 56.9 58.5 60.9 60.7 60.4 56.6 54.5 54.4 53.3
Czech Republic Equities 23.4 21.6 25.7 23.0 20.3 21.7 21.6 24.7 24.5 23.5 24.1
Czech Republic Other financial assets 16.7 23.1 17.3 18.5 18.8 17.6 18.1 18.7 20.9 22.1 22.6
Denmark Liquid assets 20.9 20.1 19.6 20.4 22.7 21.4 20.1 19.5 18.8 17.6 17.6
Denmark Equities 22.6 28.1 31.4 30.7 20.4 23.1 25.7 24.2 25.4 31.2 27.8
Denmark Other financial assets 56.5 51.8 49.0 48.9 56.9 55.4 54.2 56.3 55.8 51.2 54.6
Estonia Liquid assets 33.8 20.0 19.0 17.2 20.6 21.2 21.4 33.9 31.6 28.4 28.6
Estonia Equities 55.0 69.5 70.3 71.5 68.8 66.6 68.9 51.4 53.2 57.1 55.8
Estonia Other financial assets 11.2 10.5 10.7 11.3 10.5 12.3 9.7 14.8 15.2 14.5 15.6
Finland Liquid assets 33.1 32.1 30.2 32.4 39.4 37.5 36.7 39.3 38.8 34.4 33.3
Finland Equities 44.0 42.5 44.1 42.8 34.8 37.2 39.5 35.7 41.2 47.4 36.6
Finland Other financial assets 22.8 25.5 25.6 24.8 25.9 25.3 23.8 25.0 20.0 18.2 30.1
France Liquid assets 33.4 31.2 29.0 28.3 31.3 29.1 28.6 30.4 30.1 29.5 27.3
France Equities 29.6 26.6 28.4 28.3 22.6 23.9 24.6 16.1 23.7 24.4 27.3
France Other financial assets 37.1 42.2 42.6 43.5 46.1 47.0 46.8 53.5 46.1 46.1 45.4
Germany Liquid assets 35.1 35.5 34.9 35.5 39.2 38.3 37.9 40.9 40.8 40.4 39.1
Germany Equities 28.3 24.8 24.5 24.2 19.2 19.7 20.1 17.0 17.7 18.4 19.8
Germany Other financial assets 36.6 39.7 40.6 40.2 41.6 42.0 42.0 42.1 41.5 41.2 41.0
Greece Liquid assets 43.4 49.3 48.7 51.1 71.6 72.1 76.4 80.3 73.5 64.1 60.8
Greece Equities 42.6 32.5 33.2 33.1 9.8 10.6 9.1 5.1 8.1 22.0 29.2
Greece Other financial assets 14.0 18.2 18.1 15.8 18.6 17.3 14.5 14.5 18.5 13.9 10.0
Table 5-2: Percentage composition of gross financial wealth by country and year, continued
Year
2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Hungary Liquid assets 42.2 37.5 35.5 34.4 37.3 37.1 34.8 39.2 37.8 34.2 28.5
Hungary Equities 33.7 34.6 35.6 37.5 36.1 33.6 34.7 38.7 39.1 41.3 39.3
Hungary Other financial assets 24.1 27.8 28.9 28.1 26.7 29.3 30.5 22.1 23.1 24.4 32.2
Iceland Liquid assets 17.2 16.5 18.3 25.8 24.6 20.9 18.7 16.8 15.2
Iceland Equities 9.4 10.4 12.3 3.7 2.3 2.8 3.6 3.9 3.9 3.9
Iceland Other financial assets 73.4 73.1 69.5 70.5 73.2 76.3 77.7 79.3 80.9
Ireland Liquid assets 36.4 35.6 37.9 42.8 41.3 42.3 40.8 39.2 37.6 36.1
Ireland Equities 22.0 21.4 20.8 18.2 18.2 15.6 16.2 14.5 13.8 13.1
Ireland Other financial assets 41.6 43.0 41.3 39.0 40.5 42.1 43.0 46.2 48.6 50.8
Israel Liquid assets 20.4 21.0 18.2 21.8 16.3 19.9 22.1 22.3 21.0
Israel Equities 38.4 36.3 40.8 30.4 43.6 25.5 21.2 18.0 18.0
Israel Other financial assets 41.2 42.7 41.0 47.8 40.1 54.7 56.8 59.6 61.0
Italy Liquid assets 22.9 24.8 25.7 26.5 30.8 30.3 29.4 31.3 32.7 17.6 29.9
Italy Equities 45.8 37.2 36.4 34.4 25.9 23.8 28.2 26.6 25.8 23.5 32.5
Italy Other financial assets 31.3 38.0 38.0 39.1 43.3 45.9 42.3 42.1 41.5 58.9 37.6
Japan Liquid assets 53.6 50.2 49.5 53.0 56.0 54.9 55.2 55.9 55.3 53.1 53.1
Japan Equities 10.9 18.1 18.5 13.0 9.2 11.3 6.3 5.7 6.8 9.5 14.1
Japan Other financial assets 35.5 31.6 32.0 34.0 34.8 33.8 38.6 38.4 37.9 37.4 32.8
Kazakhstan Liquid assets 46.0
Kazakhstan Equities 6.9
Kazakhstan Other financial assets 47.1
Korea, Rep. Liquid assets 47.6 46.9 42.6 46.9 45.5 45.0 46.4 45.4 43.3 42.8
Korea, Rep. Equities 20.5 19.0 21.3 16.3 18.5 20.1 18.2 17.2 19.7 19.7
Korea, Rep. Other financial assets 31.9 34.1 36.0 36.9 36.0 34.9 35.4 37.4 37.0 37.5
Latvia Liquid assets 45.1 43.7 44.5 49.6 47.0 41.9 27.7 19.5 32.4 29.6 35.7
Latvia Equities 43.8 34.1 33.5 33.8 27.0 28.6 23.9 40.9 35.8 16.2 23.1
Latvia Other financial assets 11.2 22.2 22.1 16.6 26.0 29.4 48.4 39.6 31.8 54.1 41.1
Lithuania Liquid assets 32.8 41.9 45.2 46.4 37.8 39.5 41.1 37.1 39.1 38.6 36.1
Lithuania Equities 39.9 41.4 38.1 35.0 45.4 40.8 37.7 39.4 38.1 39.3 12.4
Lithuania Other financial assets 27.2 16.7 16.7 18.6 16.9 19.8 21.2 23.4 22.7 22.1 51.5
Luxembourg Liquid assets 49.6 51.0 55.0 55.4 49.4 50.1 53.2 52.7 52.7 51.8
Luxembourg Equities 32.2 25.3 23.0 16.6 19.0 23.8 22.0 21.1 23.9 26.1
Luxembourg Other financial assets 18.2 23.7 22.0 28.0 31.6 26.1 24.8 26.2 23.4 22.2
Malta Liquid assets 53.1 52.8 54.5 54.9 51.7 51.6 51.7 52.5 49.7 47.9
Malta Equities 23.8 23.5 21.1 20.0 22.2 20.7 18.9 16.8 16.8 16.8
Malta Other financial assets 23.1 23.7 24.4 25.1 26.2 27.6 29.4 30.7 33.5 35.3
Mexico Liquid assets 20.8 16.2 14.5 14.3 16.9 14.5
Mexico Equities 34.5 39.7 47.6 50.2 40.6 44.5
Mexico Other financial assets 44.7 44.1 38.0 35.5 42.6 41.0
Netherlands Liquid assets 17.3 20.7 20.6 21.2 25.4 24.0 23.1 23.4 22.4 21.8 21.3
Netherlands Equities 25.7 15.2 15.1 14.7 11.8 12.5 12.9 11.0 10.7 10.7 10.7
Netherlands Other financial assets 57.0 64.1 64.3 64.2 62.8 63.5 64.0 65.6 66.9 67.5 68.0
New Zealand Liquid assets 10.2 8.8 8.7 9.0 10.0 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9
New Zealand Equities 31.4 29.1 30.9 29.0 29.3 29.3 30.1 31.1 30.3 29.4 29.2
New Zealand Other financial assets 58.4 62.1 60.4 62.0 60.7 61.2 60.3 59.2 59.9 60.7 60.9
Norway Liquid assets 33.0 30.1 29.6 30.4 33.2 31.9 31.5 33.5 32.5 31.1 28.7
Norway Equities 17.6 16.4 17.0 16.4 12.1 13.1 13.1 13.9 14.1 12.3 21.3
Norway Other financial assets 49.4 53.5 53.5 53.2 54.6 55.0 55.3 52.7 53.4 56.6 50.0
Poland Liquid assets 59.6 44.0 40.3 38.6 47.1 47.0 46.9 46.0 45.1 44.6 44.0
Poland Equities 22.3 24.3 27.7 30.2 21.0 22.8 20.5 25.4 24.5 26.7 27.1
Poland Other financial assets 18.1 31.7 32.0 31.2 31.9 30.2 32.6 28.7 30.3 28.7 28.9
Table 5-2: Percentage composition of gross financial wealth by country and year, continued
Year
2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Portugal Liquid assets 36.5 34.8 34.2 34.7 38.3 37.4 37.6 38.8 39.5 39.2 42.3
Portugal Equities 32.3 33.8 34.3 33.7 27.8 28.3 27.6 27.1 26.5 26.9 25.5
Portugal Other financial assets 31.2 31.4 31.5 31.6 33.9 34.3 34.7 34.0 34.0 33.9 32.2
Romania Liquid assets 35.7 26.9 28.8 25.0 38.1 30.0 20.3 35.0 33.4 27.7 33.6
Romania Equities 42.6 65.5 64.2 67.8 49.6 57.9 74.5 51.8 51.7 51.7 51.7
Romania Other financial assets 21.8 7.6 7.1 7.1 12.3 12.0 5.2 13.2 14.9 20.6 14.7
Singapore Liquid assets 37.3 32.5 33.8 33.7 38.4 34.0 35.6 36.4 35.9 36.4
Singapore Equities 24.6 28.0 26.5 25.1 17.6 20.6 22.2 19.7 20.2 19.5
Singapore Other financial assets 38.1 39.6 39.7 41.2 44.0 45.4 42.2 43.9 43.9 44.2
Slovakia Liquid assets 83.4 66.7 58.5 58.0 58.2 62.7 60.7 64.8 64.0 63.4
Slovakia Equities 1.6 10.8 11.5 12.1 12.3 6.4 5.5 5.9 6.0 6.7
Slovakia Other financial assets 15.0 22.5 30.0 29.9 29.5 30.9 33.8 29.4 30.0 29.8
Slovenia Liquid assets 50.4 48.3 45.7 52.8 52.3 53.4 56.8 52.1 52.4 52.7
Slovenia Equities 31.1 33.3 37.0 28.5 28.8 27.6 25.2 27.5 27.5 27.5
Slovenia Other financial assets 18.6 18.4 17.2 18.7 18.9 19.1 18.0 20.5 20.1 19.8
Spain Liquid assets 39.8 36.9 36.1 38.3 47.7 47.4 48.5 49.9 48.2 46.9 43.2
Spain Equities 40.4 43.5 44.5 42.2 31.2 31.6 29.4 26.9 30.1 33.3 36.9
Spain Other financial assets 19.9 19.7 19.4 19.6 21.1 21.0 22.1 23.2 21.6 19.8 19.9
Sweden Liquid assets 14.8 15.1 15.6 18.2 21.7 19.6 18.2 19.9 18.9 15.9 14.3
Sweden Equities 40.9 38.8 40.3 38.7 33.4 36.7 36.6 35.1 26.9 36.3 43.5
Sweden Other financial assets 44.3 46.2 44.1 43.1 44.9 43.7 45.2 45.0 54.3 47.8 42.3
Switzerland Liquid assets 21.7 25.0 24.3 23.8 28.0 27.8 29.9 31.8 31.9 31.9
Switzerland Equities 27.2 24.0 25.1 24.9 19.2 20.9 20.3 20.4 19.4 20.8
Switzerland Other financial assets 51.0 51.0 50.5 51.3 52.8 51.4 49.8 47.7 48.7 47.3
Taiwan Liquid assets 47.6 44.9 44.2 42.2 46.4 41.4 40.5 42.3 42.3 40.0
Taiwan Equities 25.0 29.7 30.8 31.7 18.6 24.4 24.6 21.8 21.3 22.9
Taiwan Other financial assets 27.4 25.4 25.1 26.1 35.0 34.2 34.9 35.8 36.4 37.1
Turkey Other financial assets 17.8 16.8 7.5 7.7 9.1 9.4
United Kingdom Liquid assets 20.4 25.9 25.9 27.1 31.9 28.6 27.8 29.2 28.8 27.8 25.3
United Kingdom Equities 22.8 16.3 15.9 14.7 11.1 13.2 14.2 14.1 13.5 11.8 12.4
United Kingdom Other financial assets 56.7 57.8 58.2 58.2 57.0 58.2 58.0 56.7 57.7 60.4 62.4
United States Liquid assets 10.5 12.2 12.0 12.2 15.4 14.5 14.2 15.0 14.4 14.4 14.5
United States Equities 50.1 48.6 49.4 48.1 43.6 43.7 43.5 42.2 42.6 43.6 43.6
United States Other financial assets 39.4 39.1 38.6 39.8 41.1 41.8 42.3 42.8 42.9 42.1 41.9
Note: Other financial assets include insurance, pension reserves and other accounts receivable. Source: See Tables 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3
6.1 Introduction
Countries differ greatly in terms of their level and pattern of wealth holdings. There are also
distinct differences at the regional level. It is therefore interesting to compare regional variations
and trends during the past decade, and to document the variety of country circumstances and
experiences.
While data quality is generally good in the rich countries that hold most of the world’s wealth, it
is usually questionable elsewhere. The countries discussed in this section are all interesting in
their own right. But another reason for their selection is that they all have data on the mean level
of household wealth and a reasonable way to estimate the distribution of wealth across the
population.
The accompanying tables collate information on wealth holdings for each of the regions and
countries. Some of the core data is summarized in Table 6-1. Table 6-2 reports wealth per adult
measured in current US dollars and converted using the average USD exchange rate over the
15-year period, while Table 6-3 provides similar information for aggregate household wealth
measured in trillion US dollars. Table 6-4 shows the composition of wealth for the most recent
year for which figures are available. For each region and country, the wealth share of each
decile and the top percentiles is recorded in Table 6-5, along with the minimum wealth needed
to belong to a given regional wealth quantile. Finally, Table 6-6 shows the distribution of the
adult population by wealth range.
Three charts are provided for each of the regions. Figure 1 plots two series for mean wealth
over 2000–2015, one measured in current US dollars and the second calculated using the
average USD exchange rate. The global level of wealth per adult – which amounted to
USD 52,400 in 2015 – masks considerable regional variation. The average for North America
in 2015 was USD 342,300 compared to USD 128,500 in Europe, USD 40,500 in the Asia-
Pacific region (excluding China and India), USD 18,500 in Latin America, USD 22,500 in
China, USD 4,500 in Africa and USD 4,400 in India.
All regions have recorded an increase in wealth per adult since the start of the century. If wealth
is measured in local currencies, growth has been sustained and generally continuous apart from
the financial crisis period when all regions except Latin America suffered a setback. If wealth is
valued in current USD, the picture is somewhat different. Between 2000 and 2007, dollar
depreciation raises the regional growth rates; but dollar appreciation in more recent years has
had the opposite effect. As a consequence, wealth per adult in 2015 is at or below its 2007
level in every region except North America and China.
This in turn has implications for global wealth inequality. Although wealth levels in Europe and
Northern America have always been far above those in other regions, particularly Africa and
India, the regional imbalance appeared to be eroding during the early years of the century.
Africa, India, Latin America, and most notably China, all increased their share of world wealth
between 2000 and 2007, hinting at the possibility that global wealth inequality was on a long-
term downward trend. The subsequent reversal of growth rates accompanied by evidence of
growing wealth inequality both within and between countries suggests that falling wealth
inequality may be a more distant prospect.
Figure 2 displays the breakdown of wealth for each region per adult into financial and real (non-
financial) forms, as well as the average level of debt. On average internationally, financial assets
now comprise 55% of gross assets, while non-financial assets account for 45% and debts
amount to 14%. Financial assets are relatively more important in Japan where they represent
61% of gross assets and the United States, where they account for 69%. In developing
regions, non-financial assets typically account for the bulk of household wealth: they form 65%
of gross assets in Latin America and 86% of assets in India, for example. The proportion of real
assets is also high in Indonesia, and in several rich countries including France and Norway.
A systematic link with the stage of development is also evident in the level of household debts
expressed as a percentage of gross assets. The share is 7% in India, 8% in China and 10% in
Africa, but averages 15% in the Asia-Pacific region, Europe and North America.
Figure 3 shows wealth distribution for each region. Some interesting contrasts between regions
are evident. More than 93% of adults in Africa own less than USD 10,000, and 95% of adults
in India fall in this range. Meanwhile the fraction is 62% in China, 45% in Europe and 27% in
North America. On the other hand, 25% of adults in Europe and 40% in North America have
wealth above USD 100,000. The wealth distribution in both Latin America and the Asia-Pacific
region closely resembles the pattern in the world as a whole, and both regions show more than
70% of all adults owning less than USD 10,000.
Among developed countries, there is substantial variation in the percentage of adults recorded in
the lowest wealth ranges. Some countries report significant numbers of people in this category,
while others show very few. This reflects such factors as availability of credit including student
loans, as well as how many young adults live separately from their parents, making their low
wealth more apparent in the survey returns.
Africa Asia-Pacific
Figure 1 Figure 1
Wealth per adult over time Wealth per adult over time
Figure 2 Figure 2
Composition of wealth per adult Composition of wealth per adult
Figure 3 Figure 3
Wealth distribution relative to world (in %) Wealth distribution relative to world (in %)
China Europe
Figure 1 Figure 1
Wealth per adult over time Wealth per adult over time
Figure 2 Figure 2
Composition of wealth per adult Composition of wealth per adult
Figure 3 Figure 3
Wealth distribution relative to world (in %) Wealth distribution relative to world (in %)
Figure 2 Figure 2
Composition of wealth per adult Composition of wealth per adult
Figure 3 Figure 3
Wealth distribution relative to world (in %) Wealth distribution relative to world (in %)
North America
Figure 1
Wealth per adult over time
Figure 2
Composition of wealth per adult
Figure 3
Wealth distribution relative to world (in %)
Table 6-1: Summary details for regions and selected countries, 2015
Total Mean wealth Median wealth GDP per Number of Members of global wealth
Population Adults
Country wealth per adult per adult adult millionaires Top 10% Top 1% Data quality
thousand thousand USD bn USD USD USD thousand thousand thousand
Australia 22,498 16,919 6,174 364,896 168,291 97,420 961 12,850 1,480 Good
Austria 8,460 6,809 1,335 196,092 66,617 65,474 194 3,344 285 Satisfactory
Belgium 10,861 8,440 2,189 259,406 150,348 61,215 278 5,596 447 Satisfactory
Brazil 202,177 138,439 2,436 17,597 3,311 20,187 168 4,154 233 Fair
Canada 35,332 27,677 6,872 248,276 74,750 69,507 984 14,330 1,500 Good
Chile 17,849 12,754 535 41,982 13,503 24,715 44 1,062 61 Fair
China 1,368,920 1,013,536 22,817 22,513 7,357 9,925 1,333 39,050 1,885 Fair
Colombia 49,084 31,382 643 20,477 5,765 13,788 37 1,462 54 Satisfactory
Czech Republic 10,503 8,459 353 41,710 14,256 26,371 28 774 40 Good
Denmark 5,519 4,218 1,061 251,634 51,854 78,298 194 2,109 294 Good
Finland 5,424 4,225 633 149,917 62,729 66,625 71 2,002 106 Good
France 63,785 48,450 12,697 262,070 86,156 60,234 1,791 26,437 2,762 Good
Germany 81,426 67,079 11,939 177,984 43,898 55,294 1,525 30,205 2,281 Good
Greece 11,256 9,131 743 81,342 38,552 30,826 58 2,536 85 Satisfactory
India 1,286,444 792,023 3,447 4,352 868 2,907 185 3,988 254 Fair
Indonesia 243,095 161,671 1,460 9,031 1,615 7,700 98 2,310 136 Fair
Ireland 4,858 3,547 690 194,650 64,444 70,018 83 1,773 125 Satisfactory
Israel 7,772 5,071 791 155,982 41,926 51,812 88 1,988 124 Good
Italy 60,588 49,244 10,025 203,577 88,603 42,763 1,126 27,935 1,714 Good
Japan 125,947 104,279 19,837 190,230 96,071 60,261 2,126 58,734 3,417 Good
Korea 49,101 38,912 3,545 91,108 31,259 35,101 313 10,651 449 Satisfactory
Mexico 115,067 75,422 1,957 25,949 7,978 17,821 122 4,196 176 Satisfactory
Netherlands 16,891 13,016 2,379 182,782 74,659 65,332 282 6,778 433 Good
New Zealand 4,473 3,292 1,320 400,811 182,618 58,113 282 2,181 453 Good
Norway 5,019 3,788 1,217 321,352 119,634 134,113 205 2,462 311 Satisfactory
Poland 37,814 30,326 739 24,370 9,112 19,710 43 1,546 62 Satisfactory
Portugal 10,786 8,640 638 73,843 27,297 27,329 51 2,029 76 Satisfactory
Russia 138,221 109,516 1,284 11,726 1,388 23,027 92 1,354 122 Fair
Singapore 5,043 4,051 1,091 269,408 98,922 66,599 142 2,461 205 Good
South Africa 51,588 31,357 671 21,402 3,379 14,679 50 1,550 71 Fair
Spain 47,032 37,573 4,195 111,643 52,223 39,586 360 14,768 530 Good
Sweden 9,477 7,369 2,294 311,353 57,433 83,249 520 3,357 731 Satisfactory
Switzerland 7,722 6,156 3,491 567,122 107,583 100,281 667 3,683 831 Good
Taiwan 23,042 18,449 3,592 194,701 66,423 30,471 414 9,224 599 Satisfactory
Thailand 69,770 50,314 369 7,330 1,264 9,614 25 472 34 Fair
United Kingdom 63,368 48,696 15,601 320,368 126,472 56,333 2,364 31,612 3,623 Good
United States 330,890 243,349 85,901 352,996 49,787 73,152 15,656 113,300 20,680 Good
Africa 1,140,223 572,266 2,596 4,536 639 126 4,073 180
Asia-Pacific 1,750,261 1,134,624 45,958 40,505 2,711 4,931 114,274 7,543
China 1,368,920 1,013,536 22,817 22,513 7,357 1,333 39,050 1,885
Europe 736,663 584,088 75,059 128,506 16,142 10,011 174,007 14,974
India 1,286,444 792,023 3,447 4,352 868 185 3,988 254
Latin America 615,527 403,142 7,461 18,508 4,034 485 14,007 683
North America 366,352 271,123 92,806 342,302 59,737 16,646 127,683 22,189
World 7,264,391 4,770,803 250,145 52,432 3,210 33,717 477,082 47,709
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods.
Table 6.2: Wealth per adult (in USD) at current and constant exchange rates, for regions and selected countries, 2000–2015
Year
Country/region Exchange rate 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Australia current 103,151 204,778 243,776 303,337 237,192 289,592 336,808 384,365 416,036 403,614 422,373 364,896
Australia constant 148,595 222,743 245,861 274,596 273,234 257,681 289,028 302,038 319,103 360,765 357,136 378,887
Austria current 91,321 148,511 170,687 198,939 175,800 189,261 183,713 193,374 208,829 225,813 235,390 196,092
Austria constant 122,906 157,653 162,305 169,238 158,195 164,525 172,788 187,162 198,213 206,438 215,305 220,400
Belgium current 147,824 211,622 244,611 281,250 240,038 268,327 256,556 252,690 272,965 295,786 306,821 259,406
Belgium constant 198,950 224,649 232,598 239,261 216,000 233,257 241,299 244,572 259,088 270,407 280,648 291,562
Brazil current 8,028 10,422 13,101 17,106 14,543 22,434 24,630 27,100 24,035 21,243 23,415 17,597
Brazil constant 7,008 10,891 12,505 13,526 15,174 17,438 19,028 22,498 21,929 22,390 23,050 24,414
Canada current 108,464 174,910 190,392 234,888 176,375 218,454 237,795 234,652 264,559 267,053 278,498 248,276
Canada constant 139,279 174,343 189,905 198,661 184,877 195,700 205,903 205,069 225,363 242,300 253,912 265,312
Chile current 17,290 28,657 33,189 40,603 30,342 40,423 42,629 42,597 49,566 47,313 46,385 41,982
Chile constant 17,690 26,327 31,690 35,968 34,104 36,574 39,679 39,686 42,383 44,417 45,884 47,968
China current 5,672 9,770 12,582 16,643 13,690 16,795 18,200 19,703 20,037 21,695 21,250 22,513
China constant 6,625 11,126 13,865 17,156 13,204 16,182 17,531 17,519 17,785 18,522 18,607 19,700
Colombia current 6,610 10,470 11,976 16,033 14,794 17,327 18,295 19,721 23,105 22,057 27,275 20,477
Colombia constant 6,625 10,961 12,215 14,606 14,903 16,234 16,516 17,559 18,760 19,531 23,498 24,397
Czech Republic current 11,775 21,654 29,588 35,396 34,348 38,062 41,731 42,913 46,652 47,311 48,731 41,710
Czech Republic constant 19,912 23,816 27,631 28,623 29,727 31,273 35,855 38,272 39,770 42,025 43,697 45,641
Denmark current 104,865 174,019 204,216 234,356 203,063 218,794 223,369 220,851 243,064 281,256 284,739 251,634
Denmark constant 141,425 185,051 194,407 200,002 180,454 190,945 210,863 213,370 231,295 255,856 260,710 283,294
Finland current 78,532 136,994 157,670 183,417 156,105 161,067 156,221 150,594 158,102 177,029 180,444 149,917
Finland constant 105,693 145,427 149,927 156,034 140,472 140,016 146,931 145,755 150,065 161,840 165,047 168,501
France current 103,619 207,955 255,408 302,027 273,597 282,486 283,589 280,988 291,215 307,048 315,841 262,070
France constant 139,457 220,756 242,865 256,936 246,198 245,565 266,726 271,961 276,410 280,703 288,891 294,560
Germany current 89,770 136,388 162,170 191,034 182,219 190,495 184,060 179,683 192,529 208,969 207,752 177,984
Germany constant 120,818 144,784 154,206 162,514 163,971 165,598 173,115 173,910 182,741 191,039 190,025 200,048
Greece current 57,716 101,917 118,334 136,751 112,996 118,223 104,400 96,769 96,274 104,693 98,097 81,342
Greece constant 77,678 108,191 112,523 116,335 101,681 102,771 98,192 93,660 91,380 95,710 89,727 91,426
India current 2,036 3,332 3,910 5,106 3,803 4,368 5,267 4,573 4,712 4,274 4,489 4,352
India constant 1,925 3,038 3,500 4,072 3,728 4,125 4,736 4,928 5,222 5,349 5,462 5,607
Indonesia current 2,502 5,250 6,946 8,970 7,790 9,793 11,207 11,462 11,279 9,412 9,867 9,031
Indonesia constant 2,402 5,165 6,270 8,455 8,537 9,213 10,108 10,402 10,916 11,464 11,707 12,050
Ireland current 91,525 172,934 200,654 222,823 188,249 191,800 178,879 177,757 190,694 213,168 225,869 194,650
Ireland constant 123,180 183,580 190,800 189,557 169,398 166,733 168,243 172,047 181,000 194,878 206,593 218,780
Israel current 92,589 104,916 115,019 143,173 127,131 161,722 141,587 137,997 147,916 165,400 171,617 155,982
Israel constant 94,376 121,813 122,576 138,894 121,920 153,992 132,712 133,002 139,279 144,769 148,426 148,424
Italy current 119,773 190,807 224,825 260,171 239,436 258,004 238,683 228,332 232,986 243,838 246,069 203,577
Italy constant 161,199 202,554 213,785 221,330 215,460 224,285 224,491 220,997 221,142 222,917 224,957 228,941
Japan current 191,877 175,634 176,585 177,062 214,771 212,586 225,274 269,485 246,081 211,190 223,367 190,230
Japan constant 210,169 197,517 200,236 192,422 185,801 186,565 201,995 199,660 203,035 211,613 215,712 221,902
Korea current 33,257 60,782 73,040 83,110 56,924 67,471 75,054 75,247 84,688 88,863 95,741 91,108
Korea constant 38,159 55,793 61,623 70,594 65,056 71,293 75,970 78,643 82,270 85,097 87,900 92,215
Mexico current 17,484 25,422 29,366 32,462 25,860 30,129 32,239 27,811 31,249 31,265 31,743 25,949
Mexico constant 14,077 23,047 26,877 29,670 29,448 33,094 33,544 32,727 34,196 34,450 34,638 34,247
Netherlands current 106,872 150,197 175,232 202,622 169,219 190,069 186,994 184,868 199,206 194,731 206,977 182,782
Netherlands constant 143,834 159,443 166,627 172,372 152,273 165,228 175,874 178,928 189,079 178,023 189,316 205,442
New Zealand current 106,330 285,258 330,129 376,686 259,858 340,785 342,465 377,871 420,872 453,104 484,789 400,811
New Zealand constant 166,068 287,817 321,529 334,595 308,826 324,642 324,980 336,821 352,764 376,932 380,673 407,454
Norway current 110,805 213,142 242,719 284,634 234,642 309,185 321,874 338,898 387,607 362,642 394,568 321,352
Norway constant 149,686 220,297 231,969 235,091 250,758 272,834 289,436 309,918 329,608 336,061 369,641 385,984
Table 6.2: Wealth per adult (in USD) at current and constant exchange rates, for regions and selected countries, 2000–2015, continued
Years
Country/region Exchange rate 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Poland current 8,871 16,470 20,028 24,992 22,271 25,591 25,549 22,783 26,503 29,654 29,565 24,370
Poland constant 11,405 16,668 18,088 18,884 20,469 22,635 22,770 24,160 25,491 27,790 27,860 28,440
Portugal current 48,008 74,787 86,941 101,671 89,852 94,726 88,553 84,848 86,488 93,602 89,554 73,843
Portugal constant 64,612 79,390 82,671 86,492 80,854 82,345 83,287 82,122 82,091 85,571 81,914 82,996
Russia current 2,935 11,164 16,193 23,575 19,735 19,658 23,207 18,922 21,573 19,727 18,991 11,726
Russia constant 2,641 10,268 13,625 18,492 18,529 18,999 21,721 19,468 20,938 20,715 20,665 20,876
Singapore current 112,757 132,774 156,541 196,692 190,389 215,737 239,153 257,582 290,370 288,098 290,280 269,408
Singapore constant 133,857 151,493 164,593 194,350 187,861 207,577 224,336 229,703 243,573 248,877 248,105 248,708
South Africa current 8,434 18,803 22,960 25,842 17,202 23,735 24,017 22,332 23,901 22,217 22,078 21,402
South Africa constant 7,829 14,587 19,628 21,585 19,633 21,485 21,593 22,305 24,922 28,531 28,810 31,862
Spain current 64,521 116,106 138,981 159,467 129,675 135,140 124,524 117,528 119,518 128,942 133,250 111,643
Spain constant 86,837 123,253 132,156 135,660 116,689 117,477 117,119 113,752 113,442 117,879 121,884 125,482
Sweden current 126,304 194,547 222,876 251,601 194,935 235,406 252,971 259,769 296,512 344,439 356,406 311,353
Sweden constant 162,150 208,463 205,989 217,266 205,000 225,560 246,126 240,902 259,678 297,732 320,809 347,839
Switzerland current 232,548 295,524 339,475 384,037 381,661 423,036 417,170 497,933 540,735 586,784 591,948 567,122
Switzerland constant 345,041 352,151 375,591 391,886 368,077 395,246 407,542 424,772 449,372 473,489 475,938 480,530
Taiwan current 106,858 112,470 120,860 128,024 140,887 165,376 171,706 156,706 160,231 194,560 199,701 194,701
Taiwan constant 100,954 106,175 114,356 121,043 133,052 156,180 169,621 174,477 186,258 208,271 214,192 215,799
Thailand current 2,570 5,303 4,471 5,389 4,446 5,879 7,329 7,645 8,014 7,288 7,601 7,330
Thailand constant 3,118 6,101 4,518 5,095 4,350 5,492 6,628 6,793 6,882 6,715 6,917 6,942
United Kingdom current 162,999 242,523 298,906 324,276 206,982 250,758 250,633 229,113 250,812 284,503 315,037 320,368
United Kingdom constant 181,230 233,678 252,631 268,547 235,563 256,889 271,285 245,858 263,703 283,211 305,689 337,969
United States current 209,022 273,719 291,403 289,255 231,372 234,329 247,247 256,864 284,760 335,483 337,680 352,996
United States constant 209,022 273,719 291,403 289,255 231,372 234,329 247,247 256,864 284,760 335,483 337,680 352,996
Africa current 2,916 4,235 5,115 6,456 4,976 5,071 5,369 5,057 5,241 5,118 5,058 4,536
Africa constant 2,465 3,965 4,796 5,761 5,018 4,897 5,357 5,362 5,754 6,064 6,090 6,363
Asia-Pacific current 33,096 34,980 37,377 40,894 40,216 41,455 44,344 49,301 47,863 44,127 46,029 40,505
Asia-Pacific constant 35,936 37,419 39,240 40,865 38,354 38,323 41,166 41,943 42,852 44,797 45,314 46,131
China current 5,672 9,770 12,582 16,643 13,690 16,795 18,200 19,703 20,037 21,695 21,250 22,513
China constant 6,625 11,126 13,865 17,156 13,204 16,182 17,531 17,519 17,785 18,522 18,607 19,700
Europe current 61,287 101,532 122,232 141,955 120,464 130,510 128,097 124,149 132,269 142,349 146,873 128,506
Europe constant 79,204 105,657 113,612 120,289 113,464 117,752 123,589 121,873 126,836 132,103 136,209 143,101
India current 2,036 3,332 3,910 5,106 3,803 4,368 5,267 4,573 4,712 4,274 4,489 4,352
India constant 1,925 3,038 3,500 4,072 3,728 4,125 4,736 4,928 5,222 5,349 5,462 5,607
Latin America current 11,221 13,877 16,638 20,286 17,117 21,253 22,836 23,003 23,152 21,532 22,703 18,508
Latin America constant 8,564 13,687 16,064 18,402 18,479 20,236 21,464 23,097 23,569 24,021 24,815 25,220
North America current 198,991 263,752 281,195 283,753 225,798 232,718 246,287 254,605 282,703 328,505 331,642 342,302
North America constant 202,064 263,695 281,145 280,087 226,659 230,410 243,048 251,596 278,712 325,981 329,134 344,041
World current 31,727 42,348 47,564 52,437 44,378 47,249 48,729 49,783 51,956 54,803 55,873 52,432
World constant 35,160 43,690 46,938 48,980 43,055 44,415 46,858 47,212 49,547 53,355 54,133 56,053
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods
Table 6.3: Total wealth (in USD trn) at current and constant exchange rates, for regions and selected countries, 2000–2015
Country/region Exchange rate 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Australia current 1,432 3,066 3,702 4,669 3,699 4,575 5,389 6,229 6,828 6,707 7,061 6,174
Australia constant 2,062 3,335 3,733 4,226 4,261 4,071 4,625 4,895 5,237 5,995 5,971 6,410
Austria current 563 954 1,105 1,297 1,154 1,250 1,221 1,293 1,404 1,527 1,595 1,335
Austria constant 757 1,013 1,051 1,104 1,038 1,087 1,149 1,252 1,333 1,396 1,459 1,501
Belgium current 1,153 1,696 1,973 2,283 1,961 2,205 2,121 2,100 2,279 2,481 2,579 2,189
Belgium constant 1,552 1,801 1,876 1,942 1,764 1,917 1,994 2,032 2,163 2,268 2,359 2,461
Brazil current 839 1,224 1,571 2,092 1,813 2,848 3,181 3,558 3,205 2,876 3,194 2,436
Brazil constant 732 1,279 1,499 1,654 1,892 2,213 2,457 2,954 2,924 3,031 3,144 3,380
Canada current 2,469 4,277 4,720 5,901 4,489 5,633 6,212 6,211 7,096 7,257 7,615 6,872
Canada constant 3,170 4,264 4,708 4,991 4,705 5,046 5,379 5,428 6,045 6,584 6,943 7,343
Chile current 170 309 365 455 346 470 504 513 607 590 583 535
Chile constant 174 284 348 403 389 425 469 478 519 553 576 612
China current 4,664 8,632 11,306 15,222 12,746 15,905 17,505 19,215 19,777 21,656 21,323 22,817
China constant 5,447 9,830 12,459 15,691 12,293 15,325 16,862 17,085 17,554 18,488 18,670 19,966
Colombia current 150 268 314 430 405 485 524 576 690 672 839 643
Colombia constant 151 281 320 392 408 455 473 513 560 595 723 766
Czech Republic current 92 174 239 288 282 315 348 360 392 399 412 353
Czech Republic constant 156 191 223 233 244 259 299 321 335 355 369 386
Denmark current 427 712 837 962 835 903 924 917 1,014 1,178 1,196 1,061
Denmark constant 576 757 797 821 742 788 873 886 965 1,072 1,095 1,195
Finland current 306 550 636 744 637 661 645 625 660 743 759 633
Finland constant 412 584 605 633 573 575 606 605 626 679 694 712
France current 4,566 9,537 11,801 14,053 12,813 13,311 13,441 13,390 13,948 14,776 15,234 12,697
France constant 6,145 10,124 11,221 11,955 11,530 11,572 12,642 12,960 13,239 13,509 13,934 14,272
Germany current 5,800 8,970 10,706 12,658 12,115 12,703 12,303 12,031 12,905 14,015 13,935 11,939
Germany constant 7,807 9,522 10,180 10,768 10,902 11,043 11,571 11,645 12,249 12,813 12,746 13,419
Greece current 493 904 1,055 1,224 1,015 1,065 944 877 875 953 894 743
Greece constant 663 959 1,003 1,041 913 926 888 849 830 871 818 835
India current 1,163 2,141 2,571 3,434 2,615 3,072 3,788 3,362 3,540 3,281 3,482 3,447
India constant 1,100 1,952 2,301 2,738 2,564 2,901 3,405 3,622 3,923 4,106 4,237 4,441
Indonesia current 305 715 966 1,272 1,127 1,443 1,681 1,750 1,752 1,486 1,570 1,460
Indonesia constant 293 704 872 1,200 1,235 1,358 1,517 1,588 1,695 1,810 1,863 1,948
Ireland current 243 524 623 707 610 633 600 605 657 744 792 690
Ireland constant 327 557 592 601 548 550 564 585 624 680 725 776
Israel current 355 449 502 637 576 747 666 660 720 818 856 791
Israel constant 362 521 535 618 553 711 624 636 678 716 740 753
Italy current 5,497 9,054 10,734 12,491 11,555 12,508 11,619 11,154 11,416 11,977 12,098 10,025
Italy constant 7,398 9,611 10,207 10,626 10,398 10,873 10,928 10,796 10,835 10,949 11,060 11,274
Japan current 19,316 18,143 18,294 18,384 22,335 22,133 23,474 28,098 25,667 22,030 23,299 19,837
Japan constant 21,158 20,403 20,745 19,979 19,322 19,424 21,048 20,818 21,177 22,074 22,500 23,140
Korea current 1,097 2,149 2,612 3,002 2,076 2,484 2,791 2,826 3,214 3,408 3,690 3,545
Korea constant 1,259 1,973 2,204 2,550 2,373 2,625 2,825 2,954 3,123 3,263 3,388 3,588
Mexico current 987 1,600 1,885 2,124 1,725 2,048 2,234 1,964 2,250 2,294 2,351 1,957
Mexico constant 794 1,450 1,725 1,941 1,964 2,250 2,324 2,312 2,462 2,528 2,565 2,583
Netherlands current 1,286 1,852 2,173 2,527 2,123 2,399 2,374 2,361 2,559 2,515 2,680 2,379
Netherlands constant 1,731 1,966 2,066 2,150 1,911 2,086 2,233 2,285 2,428 2,299 2,451 2,674
New Zealand current 289 833 977 1,130 789 1,048 1,067 1,192 1,344 1,466 1,577 1,320
New Zealand constant 451 840 952 1,003 938 998 1,012 1,062 1,127 1,219 1,239 1,341
Norway current 368 731 840 995 830 1,106 1,164 1,239 1,432 1,354 1,480 1,217
Norway constant 497 755 803 822 887 976 1,047 1,133 1,218 1,254 1,387 1,462
Poland current 246 478 586 737 661 763 766 685 800 897 895 739
Poland constant 316 484 530 557 607 675 682 727 769 841 844 862
Table 6.3: Total wealth (in USD trn) at current and constant exchange rates, for regions and selected countries, 2000–2015, continued
Country/region Exchange rate 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Portugal current 379 621 728 856 761 806 756 727 743 806 772 638
Portugal constant 509 659 692 728 685 700 711 704 705 737 706 717
Russia current 317 1,221 1,778 2,601 2,186 2,183 2,581 2,102 2,391 2,177 2,091 1,284
Russia constant 285 1,123 1,496 2,040 2,052 2,110 2,415 2,163 2,320 2,286 2,275 2,286
Singapore current 326 418 508 660 663 777 888 980 1,128 1,140 1,158 1,091
Singapore constant 387 477 534 653 654 748 833 874 946 984 989 1,007
South Africa current 211 523 651 746 505 707 725 682 736 689 688 671
South Africa constant 196 406 556 623 576 640 652 681 768 885 897 999
Spain current 2,045 4,003 4,856 5,636 4,629 4,869 4,526 4,307 4,414 4,797 4,974 4,195
Spain constant 2,752 4,250 4,617 4,794 4,165 4,232 4,257 4,169 4,190 4,386 4,550 4,715
Sweden current 849 1,342 1,547 1,758 1,371 1,668 1,805 1,868 2,148 2,514 2,610 2,294
Sweden constant 1,090 1,438 1,430 1,518 1,442 1,598 1,756 1,732 1,881 2,173 2,349 2,563
Switzerland current 1,284 1,715 1,985 2,261 2,259 2,518 2,498 3,000 3,278 3,580 3,623 3,491
Switzerland constant 1,906 2,044 2,197 2,307 2,179 2,353 2,440 2,559 2,724 2,889 2,913 2,958
Taiwan current 1,804 1,989 2,155 2,299 2,546 2,997 3,122 2,858 2,932 3,572 3,672 3,592
Taiwan constant 1,704 1,877 2,039 2,173 2,404 2,831 3,084 3,182 3,408 3,824 3,939 3,981
Thailand current 106 241 206 252 210 280 353 372 394 362 379 369
Thailand constant 129 277 208 238 205 262 319 331 338 333 345 349
United Kingdom current 7,184 11,026 13,688 14,961 9,621 11,745 11,827 10,892 12,010 13,719 15,242 15,601
United Kingdom constant 7,987 10,624 11,569 12,390 10,950 12,032 12,802 11,688 12,627 13,656 14,790 16,458
United States current 42,941 59,664 64,261 64,530 52,217 53,502 57,114 60,037 67,346 80,274 81,262 85,901
United States constant 42,941 59,664 64,261 64,530 52,217 53,502 57,114 60,037 67,346 80,274 81,262 85,901
Africa current 1,114 1,865 2,317 3,009 2,386 2,501 2,722 2,635 2,806 2,815 2,819 2,596
Africa constant 942 1,746 2,173 2,685 2,406 2,415 2,716 2,794 3,081 3,335 3,394 3,641
Asia-Pacific current 27,741 32,865 35,895 40,126 40,301 42,405 46,277 52,465 51,912 48,753 51,313 45,958
Asia-Pacific constant 30,121 35,156 37,684 40,098 38,435 39,201 42,960 44,635 46,477 49,493 50,517 52,341
China current 4,664 8,632 11,306 15,222 12,746 15,905 17,505 19,215 19,777 21,656 21,323 22,817
China constant 5,447 9,830 12,459 15,691 12,293 15,325 16,862 17,085 17,554 18,488 18,670 19,966
Europe current 33,719 57,425 69,519 81,176 69,240 75,352 74,237 72,161 77,047 83,043 85,723 75,059
Europe constant 43,577 59,758 64,616 68,787 65,216 67,986 71,624 70,838 73,883 77,065 79,499 83,584
India current 1,163 2,141 2,571 3,434 2,615 3,072 3,788 3,362 3,540 3,281 3,482 3,447
India constant 1,100 1,952 2,301 2,738 2,564 2,901 3,405 3,622 3,923 4,106 4,237 4,441
Latin America current 3,398 4,685 5,732 7,129 6,134 7,762 8,498 8,719 8,935 8,459 8,996 7,461
Latin America constant 2,593 4,621 5,534 6,467 6,622 7,391 7,987 8,754 9,096 9,436 9,833 10,167
North America current 45,427 63,964 69,005 70,455 56,726 59,155 63,348 66,271 74,468 87,561 88,909 92,806
North America constant 46,129 63,950 68,993 69,545 56,942 58,569 62,515 65,488 73,417 86,889 88,236 93,277
World current 117,225 171,577 196,345 220,552 190,148 206,152 216,374 224,828 238,486 255,567 262,565 250,145
World constant 129,908 177,014 193,760 206,012 184,479 193,787 208,069 213,217 227,431 248,813 254,387 267,418
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods
Table 6-4: Composition of wealth per adult for regions and selected countries, 2015
Wealth per adult (USD) Share of gross wealth (%)
Country Non- Non-
Financial Gross Financial
financial Debts financial Debts
assets wealth assets
assets assets
Australia 185,193 276,862 97,159 462,055 40.1 59.9 21.0
Austria 95,422 128,869 28,199 224,291 42.5 57.5 12.6
Belgium 161,478 131,338 33,410 292,816 55.1 44.9 11.4
Brazil 8,204 13,470 4,077 21,674 37.9 62.1 18.8
Canada 167,584 135,156 54,464 302,740 55.4 44.6 18.0
Chile 25,962 23,593 7,573 49,555 52.4 47.6 15.3
China 12,752 11,704 1,943 24,456 52.1 47.9 7.9
Colombia 5,859 18,020 3,402 23,879 24.5 75.5 14.2
Czech Republic 22,666 26,326 7,283 48,992 46.3 53.7 14.9
Denmark 209,272 138,587 96,224 347,859 60.2 39.8 27.7
Finland 70,014 117,955 38,052 187,969 37.2 62.8 20.2
France 109,859 184,880 32,668 294,739 37.3 62.7 11.1
Germany 88,541 116,464 27,021 205,005 43.2 56.8 13.2
Greece 32,167 63,918 14,742 96,085 33.5 66.5 15.3
India 651 4,047 346 4,698 13.9 86.1 7.4
Indonesia 1,333 8,290 592 9,623 13.9 86.1 6.2
Ireland 116,952 132,434 54,736 249,386 46.9 53.1 21.9
Israel 128,460 58,644 31,122 187,104 68.7 31.3 16.6
Italy 93,190 131,186 20,799 224,376 41.5 58.5 9.3
Japan 134,484 85,707 29,962 220,191 61.1 38.9 13.6
Korea 67,986 53,647 30,525 121,633 55.9 44.1 25.1
Mexico 12,071 18,565 4,688 30,636 39.4 60.6 15.3
Netherlands 183,809 71,476 72,502 255,285 72.0 28.0 28.4
New Zealand 202,040 264,446 65,675 466,486 43.3 56.7 14.1
Norway 130,565 290,838 100,050 421,403 31.0 69.0 23.7
Poland 14,585 15,582 5,798 30,167 48.3 51.7 19.2
Portugal 47,464 47,486 21,107 94,950 50.0 50.0 22.2
Russia 2,490 11,277 2,041 13,767 18.1 81.9 14.8
Singapore 175,158 148,893 54,642 324,051 54.1 45.9 16.9
South Africa 18,653 7,672 4,923 26,325 70.9 29.1 18.7
Spain 59,119 76,421 23,897 135,540 43.6 56.4 17.6
Sweden 184,437 183,678 56,762 368,115 50.1 49.9 15.4
Switzerland 394,628 317,521 145,027 712,149 55.4 44.6 20.4
Taiwan 136,044 84,737 26,080 220,781 61.6 38.4 11.8
Thailand 4,498 5,391 2,559 9,889 45.5 54.5 25.9
United Kingdom 197,805 178,128 55,566 375,933 52.6 47.4 14.8
United States 283,059 128,638 58,701 411,697 68.8 31.2 14.3
Africa 2,441 2,605 511 5,046 48.4 51.6 10.1
Asia-Pacific 25,270 22,927 7,691 48,197 52.4 47.6 16.0
China 12,752 11,704 1,943 24,456 52.1 47.9 7.9
Europe 69,211 81,510 22,216 150,721 45.9 54.1 14.7
India 651 4,047 346 4,698 13.9 86.1 7.4
Latin America 7,682 14,093 3,267 21,775 35.3 64.7 15.0
North America 271,267 129,303 58,269 400,570 67.7 32.3 14.5
World 33,659 27,442 8,668 61,101 55.1 44.9 14.2
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods.
Table 6-5: Wealth shares and minimum wealth of deciles and top percentiles for regions and selected countries, 2015
Wealth decile Top
Country
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10% 5% 1%
I Wealth shares (%)
Australia 0.2 1.1 2.0 2.9 4.0 5.8 7.7 10.2 14.9 51.3 39.5 21.4
Austria -0.7 -0.2 0.3 1.0 2.0 4.1 6.2 8.8 14.5 63.8 51.2 29.3
Belgium -0.1 0.8 1.7 2.8 4.2 6.7 8.9 11.4 15.9 47.6 35.2 17.6
Brazil 0.0 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.4 3.6 5.5 9.6 75.4 66.1 48.0
Canada -0.2 0.3 0.7 1.3 2.4 4.8 7.1 10.0 16.0 57.7 45.0 25.1
Chile -0.3 0.3 0.8 1.4 2.1 3.7 4.9 6.6 10.3 70.3 61.1 43.2
China 0.4 1.1 1.7 2.3 2.9 3.7 4.8 6.7 10.7 65.7 56.4 39.4
Colombia 0.0 0.4 0.9 1.4 2.2 3.4 5.0 7.4 12.5 66.8 54.8 34.0
Czech Republic -0.1 0.3 0.7 1.3 2.1 4.0 5.5 7.4 11.4 67.6 57.6 39.0
Denmark -4.7 -1.8 -0.7 0.6 1.5 3.7 6.4 9.9 18.3 66.9 52.3 29.1
Finland -0.7 0.0 0.6 1.5 2.6 5.0 7.1 9.7 15.0 59.3 47.1 27.2
France -0.1 0.3 0.8 1.4 2.6 5.7 8.1 10.7 15.9 54.7 42.2 23.1
Germany -0.5 -0.1 0.3 0.9 1.9 3.9 6.0 9.1 15.6 62.8 50.1 29.5
Greece -0.1 0.8 1.7 2.6 3.7 5.4 7.1 9.2 13.4 56.2 45.3 27.1
India 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.7 2.5 3.6 5.2 8.5 76.3 68.6 53.0
Indonesia 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.2 3.2 4.9 8.6 77.9 71.8 53.5
Ireland -0.2 0.3 0.8 1.5 2.6 5.2 7.3 9.7 14.3 58.3 46.0 26.8
Israel 0.0 0.4 0.9 1.4 2.2 3.6 5.1 7.2 11.3 67.8 57.4 38.7
Italy -0.1 0.7 1.5 2.4 3.6 5.9 8.0 10.3 14.6 53.1 41.5 23.4
Japan 0.3 1.1 1.8 2.6 3.8 5.9 8.0 10.9 16.2 49.4 36.8 18.5
Korea -0.3 0.5 1.2 2.0 2.9 4.5 6.1 8.2 12.2 62.8 52.4 34.1
Mexico 0.1 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.4 3.7 5.2 7.4 12.0 66.0 55.2 36.0
Netherlands -2.0 -0.3 0.8 2.1 3.3 5.7 7.9 10.4 16.0 56.0 43.3 23.8
New Zealand 0.1 0.6 1.1 1.9 3.0 5.5 7.9 11.3 18.2 50.4 36.8 17.5
Norway -4.2 -0.8 0.6 2.1 3.1 5.9 8.3 10.8 15.9 58.3 45.0 25.0
Poland -0.1 0.3 0.7 1.3 2.2 4.5 6.3 8.5 12.9 63.5 52.6 33.7
Portugal -0.2 0.7 1.4 2.2 3.1 5.0 6.8 8.9 13.2 58.9 47.2 27.9
Russia 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.4 2.1 3.0 5.1 87.1 82.0 70.3
Singapore 0.1 0.7 1.4 2.2 3.1 4.7 6.4 8.5 12.6 60.4 49.2 30.7
South Africa 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.2 2.0 3.2 5.4 10.9 75.9 64.4 42.8
Spain -0.3 1.1 2.1 3.0 3.8 5.3 7.0 9.1 13.2 55.9 45.1 27.2
Sweden 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.3 3.5 6.1 12.7 72.1 56.4 31.6
Switzerland 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.4 3.7 6.3 12.5 71.3 58.0 34.8
Taiwan 0.1 0.6 1.2 1.9 2.9 4.4 6.1 8.3 12.7 61.8 51.0 32.4
Thailand 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.4 3.4 4.7 7.7 78.6 71.3 56.0
United Kingdom 0.1 0.7 1.3 2.2 3.3 5.4 7.5 10.2 15.3 54.1 42.0 23.2
United States -0.5 -0.1 0.2 0.6 1.1 2.1 3.5 5.9 11.7 75.6 63.0 37.3
Africa 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.8 2.9 4.8 9.6 78.6 68.4 47.2
Asia-Pacific 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.4 2.8 9.1 84.7 70.8 41.2
China 0.4 1.1 1.7 2.3 2.9 3.7 4.8 6.7 10.7 65.7 56.4 39.4
Europe -0.4 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.9 3.8 7.7 15.9 70.0 55.8 32.2
India 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.7 2.5 3.6 5.2 8.5 76.3 68.6 53.0
Latin America 0.0 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.8 2.7 4.1 6.4 11.0 72.0 61.8 42.7
North America -0.5 -0.1 0.2 0.6 1.2 2.3 3.8 6.2 11.9 74.3 61.8 36.7
World -0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.4 2.6 7.0 87.7 76.6 50.0
II Minimum wealth (USD)
Africa 39 119 234 395 639 1,011 1,629 2,904 6,607 13,146 52,618
Asia-Pacific 219 568 1,021 1,711 2,711 4,273 7,613 17,806 69,638 172,665 583,228
China 1,533 3,116 4,438 5,757 7,357 9,471 12,612 18,017 32,334 56,001 200,429
Europe 23 472 2,052 5,993 16,142 33,300 67,925 142,004 285,924 478,737 1,439,990
India 52 237 403 603 868 1,289 1,846 2,760 5,084 9,305 37,851
Latin America 246 869 1,603 2,596 4,034 6,086 9,289 14,876 28,635 51,578 185,148
North America -6,723 1,372 14,230 29,335 59,737 100,700 164,093 276,690 611,800 1,207,751 4,493,066
World 132 474 987 1,870 3,210 5,443 9,435 19,861 68,845 185,336 759,927
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods.
Table 6-6: Distribution of wealth for regions and selected countries, 2015
I Number of adults (thousands)
Wealth range (USD)
Country Under 10,000- 100,000-
Over 1 million All ranges
10,000 100,000 1 million
Australia 1,219 4,411 10,328 961 16,919
Austria 1,902 2,213 2,499 194 6,808
Belgium 834 2,793 4,534 278 8,439
Brazil 105,080 30,705 2,487 168 138,440
Canada 5,114 8,825 12,755 984 27,678
Chile 6,124 5,949 637 44 12,754
China 629,075 360,083 23,045 1,333 1,013,536
Colombia 20,288 10,220 837 37 31,382
Czech Republic 4,078 3,892 460 28 8,458
Denmark 1,346 1,034 1,644 194 4,218
Finland 1,096 1,569 1,488 71 4,224
France 8,189 16,037 22,434 1,791 48,451
Germany 19,893 22,727 22,934 1,525 67,079
Greece 1,796 5,844 1,434 58 9,132
India 755,563 33,861 2,413 185 792,022
Indonesia 148,811 11,373 1,389 98 161,671
Ireland 668 1,252 1,544 83 3,547
Israel 1,004 2,637 1,342 88 5,071
Italy 6,095 18,527 23,496 1,126 49,244
Japan 9,407 44,073 48,673 2,126 104,279
Korea 9,347 23,056 6,195 313 38,911
Mexico 42,772 30,088 2,440 122 75,422
Netherlands 2,944 4,045 5,745 282 13,016
New Zealand 329 1,019 1,663 282 3,293
Norway 873 831 1,878 205 3,787
Poland 15,996 13,391 896 43 30,326
Portugal 2,150 5,274 1,165 51 8,640
Russia 100,115 8,470 839 92 109,516
Singapore 405 1,620 1,884 142 4,051
South Africa 22,784 7,611 912 50 31,357
Spain 4,541 23,599 9,074 360 37,574
Sweden 1,167 3,490 2,192 520 7,369
Switzerland 103 2,904 2,483 667 6,157
Taiwan 2,416 8,623 6,995 414 18,448
Thailand 46,418 3,582 289 25 50,314
United Kingdom 4,870 16,492 24,970 2,364 48,696
United States 68,342 79,959 79,393 15,656 243,350
Africa 534,136 35,620 2,383 126 572,265
Asia-Pacific 843,327 199,560 86,806 4,931 1,134,624
China 629,075 360,083 23,045 1,333 1,013,536
Europe 260,814 179,445 133,819 10,011 584,089
India 755,563 33,861 2,413 185 792,022
Latin America 289,169 105,215 8,272 485 403,141
North America 73,477 88,811 92,189 16,646 271,123
World 3,385,561 1,002,596 348,928 33,717 4,770,802
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods.
Table 6-6: Distribution of wealth for regions and selected countries, 2015, continued
II Percentage of world adults (in %)
wealth range (USD)
Country Under 10,000- 100,000-
Over 1 million All ranges
10,000 100,000 1 million
Australia 0.0 0.4 3.0 2.9 0.4
Austria 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.1
Belgium 0.0 0.3 1.3 0.8 0.2
Brazil 3.1 3.1 0.7 0.5 2.9
Canada 0.2 0.9 3.7 2.9 0.6
Chile 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.3
China 18.6 35.9 6.6 4.0 21.2
Colombia 0.6 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.7
Czech Republic 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2
Denmark 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.1
Finland 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1
France 0.2 1.6 6.4 5.3 1.0
Germany 0.6 2.3 6.6 4.5 1.4
Greece 0.1 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2
India 22.3 3.4 0.7 0.6 16.6
Indonesia 4.4 1.1 0.4 0.3 3.4
Ireland 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1
Israel 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1
Italy 0.2 1.9 6.7 3.3 1.0
Japan 0.3 4.4 14.0 6.3 2.2
Korea 0.3 2.3 1.8 0.9 0.8
Mexico 1.3 3.0 0.7 0.4 1.6
Netherlands 0.1 0.4 1.7 0.8 0.3
New Zealand 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.8 0.1
Norway 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.1
Poland 0.5 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.6
Portugal 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2
Russia 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 2.3
Singapore 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.1
South Africa 0.7 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.7
Spain 0.1 2.4 2.6 1.1 0.8
Sweden 0.0 0.4 0.6 1.5 0.2
Switzerland 0.0 0.3 0.7 2.0 0.1
Taiwan 0.1 0.9 2.0 1.2 0.4
Thailand 1.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 1.1
United Kingdom 0.1 1.6 7.2 7.0 1.0
United States 2.0 8.0 22.8 46.4 5.1
Africa 15.8 3.6 0.7 0.4 12.0
Asia-Pacific 24.9 19.9 24.9 14.6 23.8
China 18.6 35.9 6.6 4.0 21.2
Europe 7.7 17.9 38.4 29.7 12.2
India 22.3 3.4 0.7 0.6 16.6
Latin America 8.5 10.5 2.4 1.4 8.5
North America 2.2 8.9 26.4 49.4 5.7
World 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods
Table 6-6: Distribution of wealth for regions and selected countries, 2015, continued
III Percentage of adults by wealth range (in %)
wealth range (USD) Gini
Under 10,000- 100,000-1 Over 1
All ranges %
10,000 100,000 million million
Australia 7.2 26.1 61.0 5.7 100 63.9
Austria 27.9 32.5 36.7 2.9 100 77.9
Belgium 9.9 33.1 53.7 3.3 100 62.6
Brazil 75.9 22.2 1.8 0.1 100 83.0
Canada 18.5 31.9 46.1 3.6 100 72.6
Chile 48.0 46.6 5.0 0.3 100 79.5
China 62.1 35.5 2.3 0.1 100 73.3
Colombia 64.6 32.6 2.7 0.1 100 76.9
Czech Republic 48.2 46.0 5.4 0.3 100 77.9
Denmark 31.9 24.5 39.0 4.6 100 89.3
Finland 26.0 37.1 35.2 1.7 100 74.2
France 16.9 33.1 46.3 3.7 100 70.3
Germany 29.7 33.9 34.2 2.3 100 77.5
Greece 19.7 64.0 15.7 0.6 100 68.0
India 95.4 4.3 0.3 0.0 100 83.1
Indonesia 92.0 7.0 0.9 0.1 100 84.7
Ireland 18.8 35.3 43.5 2.4 100 71.7
Israel 19.8 52.0 26.5 1.7 100 77.2
Italy 12.4 37.6 47.7 2.3 100 66.7
Japan 9.0 42.3 46.7 2.0 100 63.4
Korea 24.0 59.3 15.9 0.8 100 73.8
Mexico 56.7 39.9 3.2 0.2 100 75.9
Netherlands 22.6 31.1 44.1 2.2 100 73.2
New Zealand 10.0 30.9 50.5 8.6 100 67.0
Norway 23.1 21.9 49.6 5.4 100 77.9
Poland 52.7 44.2 3.0 0.1 100 75.6
Portugal 24.9 61.0 13.5 0.6 100 70.5
Russia 91.4 7.7 0.8 0.1 100 91.2
Singapore 10.0 40.0 46.5 3.5 100 70.8
South Africa 72.7 24.3 2.9 0.2 100 84.0
Spain 12.1 62.8 24.1 1.0 100 67.1
Sweden 15.8 47.4 29.7 7.1 100 80.9
Switzerland 1.7 47.2 40.3 10.8 100 80.3
Taiwan 13.1 46.7 37.9 2.2 100 72.7
Thailand 92.3 7.1 0.6 0.1 100 84.8
United Kingdom 10.0 33.9 51.3 4.9 100 67.8
United States 28.1 32.9 32.6 6.4 100 85.0
Africa 93.3 6.2 0.4 0.0 100 85.6
Asia-Pacific 74.3 17.6 7.7 0.4 100 89.2
China 62.1 35.5 2.3 0.1 100 73.3
Europe 44.7 30.7 22.9 1.7 100 83.4
India 95.4 4.3 0.3 0.0 100 83.1
Latin America 71.7 26.1 2.1 0.1 100 80.9
North America 27.1 32.8 34.0 6.1 100 84.2
World 71.0 21.0 7.3 0.7 100 91.5
Source: Original estimates; see text for explanation of methods.
Bibliography
Banerjee, A. and E. Duflo (2008): “What is middle class about the middle classes around the
world?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 22(2): 3-28.
Brandolini, A., L. Cannari, G. D’Alession, and I. Faiella (2004): “Household wealth distribution
in Italy in the 1990s”, Termi di discussione 530, Bank of Italy: Rome.
Birdsall, N., C. Graham and S. Pettinato (2000): “Stuck in the tunnel: Is globalization muddling
the middle class?”, The Brookings Institution Center on Social and Economic Dynamics,
Working Paper No. 14.
Bussolo, M., R. De Hoyos and D. Medvedev (2008), “Is the developing world catching up?
global convergence and national rising dispersion,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper
4733.
Corral, P.; V. Molini, and G. Oseni (2015): “No condition is permanent: middle class in Nigeria
in the last decade”, Policy Research Working Paper 7214, World Bank.
Davies, J. B. (ed) (2008): Personal Wealth from a Global Perspective, Oxford University Press,
Oxford.
Davies, J. B. and A. F. Shorrocks (2000): “The distribution of wealth”, in (A.B. Atkinson and F.
Bourguignon, eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, Volume I, pp. 605-76, Amsterdam:
Elsevier.
Davies, J. B., S. Sandström, A. F. Shorrocks and E. N. Wolff (2008): “The world distribution of
household wealth”, in Davies (2008), pp. 395-418.
Davies, J. B., S. Sandstrom, A. F. Shorrocks and E. N. Wolff (2011): “The level and distribution
of global household wealth”, Economic Journal 121: 223-254.
Dell, F., T. Piketty, and E. Saez (2005): “Income and wealth concentration in Switzerland over
the 20th Century”, CEPR Discussion Paper 5090, Centre for Economic Policy Research:
London.
The Economist (2009), “Who’s in the middle?, It’s a matter of definition.”, February 12.
Kennikell, A, B. (2009): “Ponds and streams: wealth and income in the U.S., 1989 to 2007”,
Discussion Paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C.
Leipziger, D. M., D. Dollar, A. F. Shorrocks and S. Y. Song (1992): The distribution of income
and wealth in Korea, World Bank: Washington DC.
Li, S., and R. Zhao (2008): “Changes in the distribution of wealth in China, 1995-2002”, in
Davies (2008), 93-111.
López-Calva, L. F. and E. Ortiz-Juarez (2014): “A vulnerability approach to the definition of the
middle class”, Journal of Economic Inequality 12: 23-47.
Lux, M. (2006): “Housing systems change on the way to EU – Similarities and differences,
integration or convergence” paper presented at the ENHR conference on Housing in an
Expanding Europe: Theory, Policy, Participation and Implementation, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 - 5
July.
Milanovic, B. and S. Yitzhaki (2002): “Decomposing world income distribution: Does the world
have a middle class?”, Review of Income and Wealth 48 (2): 155-178.
Ohlson, H., J. Roine and D. Waldenström (2008): “Long-run changes in the concentration of
wealth: An overview of recent findings”, in Davies (2008).
Parker, John (2009): “Special report: Burgeoning bourgeoisie”, The Economist, February 12.
Piketty, T., G, Postel-Vinay, and J-L. Rosenthal (2004): “Wealth concentration in a developing
economy: Paris and France 1807-1994”, CEPR Disussion Paper 4631, Centre for Economic
Policy Research: London.
Ravallion, M. (2009): “The developing world‘s bulging (but vulnerable) middle class”, World
Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS4816.
Shorrocks, A. and Wan, G. (2009): “Ungrouping income distributions: synthesising samples for
inequality and poverty analysis”, in (K. Basu and R. Kanbur, eds.), Arguments for a Better
World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Volume I: Ethics, Welfare and Measurement, pp. 414-
34, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Subramanian, S., and D. Jayaraj (2008): “The distribution of household wealth in India”, in
Davies (2008), 112-33.
Thurow, L. (1987): “A surge in inequality”, Scientific American 256: 30-37.
Zellner, A. (1962): “An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests
of aggregation bias”, Journal of the American Statistical Associationvol. 57(298), pp. 348-68.
Data references
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010): “Household wealth and wealth distribution, Australia
2009-2010”, [Link]/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/6554.0Main+Features12009-
10?OpenDocument
Canada: Survey of Financial Security 2012, available from:
[Link]
China, Taiwan: Flow of Funds, Republic of China (Taiwan). Available from:
[Link]
Chile: Encuesta Financiera de los Hogares 2011, available from:
[Link]
Colombia: Colombia Central Bank, Financial Accounts. Available from:
[Link]
Denmark: Forderling and Levevilkar (2009) “Øget polarisering i Danmark”,
Arbejderbevaegelsens Erhvervsrad. Available from: [Link]/publikationer/oeget-
polarisering-i-danmark
Eurozone: Eurosystem’s Household Finance and Consumption Survey. Available from:
[Link]/home/html/researcher_hfcn.[Link]
Eurostat Financial Balance Sheets. Available from:
[Link]
Indonesia: Indonesia Family Life Survey 1997. Available from: [Link]/labor/-
FLS/[Link]
Italy: Survey of Household Income and Wealth 2010. Available from:
[Link]
famiglie/[Link]
International Monetary Fund (IMF) Global Financial Statistical Report, September 2006. Chapter
II, available from: [Link]/External/Pubs/FT/GFSR/2006/02/[Link]
Japan: National Survey of Family Income and Expenditure 2009. Available from: www.e-
[Link]/SG1/estat/[Link]?bid=000001029405&cycode=0
Korea, Republic: Survey of Household Finances and Living Conditions 2011. Available from:
[Link]/portal/english/surveyOutlines/4/3/[Link]
Statistics New Zealand (2002): The wealth of New Zealanders: a report on their assets and
debts, Household Economic Statistics Division: Wellington.
Statistics Norway (2015): Income and wealth statistics for households, available from:
[Link]
Singapore: Singapore Department of Statistics, Household Sector Balance Sheet. Available
from: [Link]
Spain: Encuesta Financiera de las Familias (Survey of Household Finances) 2008, Bank of
Spain. Available from: [Link]/bde/en/areas/estadis/Otras_estadistic/Encuesta_Financi/
Statistics Sweden (2007): Wealth statistics 2007, Statistics Sweden: Örebro.
Thailand: Socioeconomic Survey 2006. See: Ariyapruchya, Kiatipong; Wilatluk Sinswat and
Nalin Chutchotitham (2008), “The Wealth and Debt of Thai Households: Risk Management and
Financial Access”, Bank of Thailand Discussion Paper.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) statistics. Households’
financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Available from: [Link]/
Unicredit (2011), “CEE Households’ Wealth and Debt Monitor”. Available from:
[Link]/files/inet_HOUSEHOLD_may2011_030511.pdf
United Kingdom Wealth and Assets Survey 2008-2010.
[Link]
United States: Survey of Consumer Finances 2013. Available from:
[Link]/econresdata/scf/[Link]
World Top Incomes Database: [Link]
Anthony Shorrocks is Director of Global Economic Perspectives Ltd. After receiving his PhD
from the London School of Economics (LSE), he taught at the LSE until 1983, when he
became Professor of Economics at Essex University, serving also as Head of Department and
Director of Economic Research for the British Household Panel Study. In 2001, he was
appointed Director of the World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United
Nations University (UNUWIDER) in Helsinki, where he remained until 2009. He has published
widely on income and wealth distribution, inequality, poverty and mobility, and was elected a
Fellow of the Econometric Society in 1996. Publications include “The age-wealth relationship: A
cross section and cohort analysis” (Review of Economics and Statistics1975), “The portfolio
composition of asset holdings in the United Kingdom” (Economic Journal 1982), and, with Jim
Davies and others, “Assessing the quantitative importance of inheritance in the distribution of
wealth” (Oxford Economic Papers 1978), “The distribution of wealth” (Handbook of Income
Distribution 2000), “The world distribution of household wealth” in Personal Wealth from a
Global Perspective (Oxford University Press 2008), “The global pattern of household wealth”
(Journal of International Development 2009) and “The Level and Distribution of Global
Household Wealth” (Economic Journal 2011).
Jim Davies is a Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Western Ontario
in Canada, where he has been a faculty member since 1977 and served as chair of the
department from 1992 to 2001. He received his PhD from the London School of Economics in
1979. Jim was the director of the Economic Policy Research Institute at UWO from 2001 to
2012. In 2010, he completed a five-year term as managing editor of the academic journal
Canadian Public Policy. From 2006 to 2008, he directed an international research program on
household wealth holdings at UNU-WIDER in Helsinki and edited the resulting volume,
“Personal Wealth from a Global Perspective” (Oxford University Press 2008). He has authored
two books and over 70 articles and chapters in books on topics ranging from tax policy to
household saving and the distribution of wealth. Publications include “The Relative Impact of
Inheritance and Other Factors on Economic Inequality” (Quarterly Journal of Economics 1982),
“Wealth and Economic Inequality” (Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, Oxford University
Press, 2009), and several publications on wealth authored jointly with Anthony Shorrocks and
others. Jim is also the editor of “The Economics of the Distribution of Wealth,” published earlier
this year by Edward Elgar.
Imprint
This document was produced by and the opinions expressed are those of Credit Suisse as of the date of writing
and are subject to change. It has been prepared solely for information purposes and for the use of the recipient. It
does not constitute an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Credit Suisse to any person to buy or sell any
security. Nothing in this material constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a representation that
any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances, or otherwise constitutes a
personal recommendation to you. The price and value of investments mentioned and any income that might
accrue may fluctuate and may fall or rise. Any reference to past performance is not a guide to the future.
The information and analysis contained in this publication have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed
to be reliable but Credit Suisse does not make any representation as to their accuracy or completeness and does
not accept liability for any loss arising from the use hereof. A Credit Suisse Group company may have acted upon
the information and analysis contained in this publication before being made available to clients of Credit Suisse.
Investments in emerging markets are speculative and considerably more volatile than investments in established
markets. Some of the main risks are political risks, economic risks, credit risks, currency risks and market risks.
Investments in foreign currencies are subject to exchange rate fluctuations. Any questions about topics raised in
this piece or your investments should be made directly to your local relationship manager or other advisers. Before
entering into any transaction, you should consider the suitability of the transaction to your particular circumstances
and independently review (with your professional advisers as necessary) the specific financial risks as well as legal,
regulatory, credit, tax and accounting consequences. This document is issued and distributed in the United States
by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, a U.S. registered broker-dealer; in Canada by Credit Suisse Securities
(Canada), Inc.; and in Brazil by Banco de Investimentos Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A.
This document is distributed in Switzerland by Credit Suisse AG, a Swiss bank. Credit Suisse is authorized and
regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). This document is issued and distributed in
Europe (except Switzerland) by Credit Suisse (UK) Limited and Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited. Credit
Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited and Credit Suisse (UK) Limited, both authorized by the Prudential Regulation
Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority, are associated
but independent legal entities within Credit Suisse. The protections made available by the Financial Conduct
Authority and/or the Prudential Regulation Authority for retail clients do not apply to investments or services
provided by a person outside the UK, nor will the Financial Services Compensation Scheme be available if the
issuer of the investment fails to meet its obligations. This document is distributed in Guernsey by Credit Suisse
(Channel Islands) Limited, an independent legal entity registered in Guernsey under 15197, with its registered
address at Helvetia Court, Les Echelons, South Esplanade, St Peter Port, Guernsey. Credit Suisse (Channel
Islands) Limited is wholly owned by Credit Suisse AG and is regulated by the Guernsey Financial Services
Commission. Copies of the latest audited accounts are available on request. This document is distributed in Jersey
by Credit Suisse (Channel Islands) Limited, Jersey Branch, which is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services
Commission for the conduct of investment business. The address of Credit Suisse (Channel Islands) Limited,
Jersey Branch, in Jersey is: TradeWind House, 22 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE4 5WU. This document has
been issued in Asia-Pacific by whichever of the following is the appropriately authorized entity of the relevant
jurisdiction: in Hong Kong by Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited, a corporation licensed with the Hong Kong
Securities and Futures Commission or Credit Suisse Hong Kong branch, an Authorized Institution regulated by the
Hong Kong Monetary Authority and a Registered Institution regulated by the Securities and Futures Ordinance
(Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong); in Japan by Credit Suisse Securities (Japan) Limited; this document
has been prepared and issued for distribution in Singapore to institutional investors, accredited investors and
expert investors (each as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations) only, and is also distributed by Credit
Suisse AG, Singapore Branch to overseas investors (as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations). Credit
Suisse AG, Singapore Branch may distribute reports produced by its foreign entities or affiliates pursuant to an
arrangement under Regulation 32C of the Financial Advisers Regulations. Singapore recipients should contact
Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch at +65-6212-2000 for matters arising from, or in connection with, this
report. By virtue of your status as an institutional investor, accredited investor, expert investor or overseas investor,
Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch is exempted from complying with certain compliance requirements under the
Financial Advisers Act, Chapter 110 of Singapore (the “FAA”), the Financial Advisers Regulations and the relevant
Notices and Guidelines issued thereunder, in respect of any financial advisory service which Credit Suisse AG,
Singapore branch may provide to you. ; elsewhere in Asia/Pacific by whichever of the following is the
appropriately authorized entity in the relevant jurisdiction: Credit Suisse Equities (Australia) Limited, Credit Suisse
Securities (Thailand) Limited, Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch,
and elsewhere in the world by the relevant authorized affiliate of the above.
This document may not be reproduced either in whole, or in part, without the written permission of the authors
and Credit Suisse. © 2015 Credit Suisse Group AG and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved
[Link]@[Link]
[Link]/researchinstitute
Developed countries generally exhibit higher wealth per adult compared to developing countries. For instance, countries like Switzerland and Norway have wealth per adult figures exceeding USD 175,000, while developing countries such as India and Indonesia have figures below USD 10,000. This reflects significant economic divides between developed and developing nations, highlighting disparities in financial resources and economic opportunities .
Debt plays a crucial role in shaping the financial landscapes of countries like the United States and Japan. In the U.S., significant levels of private debt support consumer spending but can exacerbate financial instability during economic downturns. In Japan, although the debt per adult is substantial, it is managed through high savings rates and government financial policies that maintain economic stability and support social infrastructure .
In Australia, financial assets contribute 40.1% and non-financial assets 59.9% to gross wealth, reflecting a balanced wealth composition largely supported by property ownership and investments. In contrast, Brazil's wealth relies more heavily on non-financial assets (62.1%), with less emphasis on financial assets (37.9%), indicating reliance on tangible assets for wealth accumulation. These differences highlight structural economic orientation and investment behaviors .
Yes, the distribution of wealth among adults within different brackets can reveal economic trends. For example, a high concentration of wealth in upper brackets may indicate wealth accumulation among affluent groups, a decline in middle-class share, or economic instability affecting lower-income populations. Conversely, balanced wealth distribution suggests more equitable economic growth and mobility within the region .
Incorporating state pension values could expand the size of the middle class, particularly in high-income countries, by providing a more comprehensive view of lifetime wealth. However, this inclusion could be misleading as state pension values are subject to policy changes, unlike private pensions that have legal ownership. The variability and uncertainty associated with state pensions limit their utility in assessing stable middle-class status .
In 2015, life was a significant difference in wealth distribution between China and Europe in terms of adults with wealth over USD 1 million. Europe had approximately 10,011 adults with wealth over USD 1 million (1.7% of its adult population), while China had about 1.3 million, indicating the concentration of wealth within specific demographic groups and highlighting the broader economic capacity and wealth accumulation in Europe relative to China .
The decreasing share of middle-class wealth can lead to socioeconomic instability by widening income inequality and reducing economic mobility. This could result in increased social unrest and diminished consumer spending power, which are critical for economic growth. Policy implications may include the need for measures to support the middle class, such as progressive taxation, investment in education, and financial support to foster wealth creation and preservation among middle-income households .
Between 2000 and 2015, the share of middle-class wealth declined in every region, with a percentage decline since 2008 in the range of 9-13% for most regions, 16% in Latin America, and 17% in North America. Contributing factors include wealth growth not keeping pace with the population growth in the developing world, a shift in the distribution of wealth gains in favor of higher wealth levels, and higher levels of personal debt in certain countries. The middle class was also affected by former members rising out of it, notably in the United States, where adults beyond the middle class grew by almost 50% .
Wealth estimates from 2000 to 2015 reveal significant economic disparities between regions, with regions like North America and Europe seeing a larger share of the world's wealth. Regions such as Africa and Asia-Pacific have a predominant share of adults with wealth under USD 10,000, indicating larger economic disparities within these regions compared to others. North America and Europe have higher wealth per adult figures, reflecting broader economic divides .
Wealth inequality in economically advanced countries like Japan and Germany can be attributed to factors such as income disparity, differences in financial asset ownership, tax policies favoring the wealthy, and varying degrees of access to investment opportunities. The concentration of wealth within certain demographics or regions often exacerbates this inequality, despite overall economic growth .