02/12/2021, 23:37 Aldous and his women | Biography books | The Guardian
The Observer
Aldous and his women
Adam Mars-Jones
Sun 7 Apr 2002 15.05 BST
Aldous Huxley
Nicholas Murray
Little, Brown £20, pp496
Nicholas Murray faces two frustrations as a biographer of Aldous Huxley. One,
paradoxically, is that Huxley was a conscientious archivist who kept, for instance,
the love letters exchanged with his first wife, Maria, in a tin box, and also the journal
she wrote before the war. This primary material and much else (at least two
unfinished novels, the manuscript of DH Lawrence's St Mawr, literary
correspondence and a copiously annotated library) was destroyed by fire at his Los
Angeles house in 1961, two years before his death.
Huxley and his second wife, Laura, saved only a few things. He took the manuscript
of his work in progress, his last novel Island, and some suits as an afterthought.
Laura's priority was her Guarnieri violin, her afterthought a Chinese porcelain
statue. They didn't seem to grasp the urgency involved. Murray comes close to
reproaching them for their culpable serenity: 'This whole episode is very strange.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/apr/07/biography.highereducation1 1/4
02/12/2021, 23:37 Aldous and his women | Biography books | The Guardian
Why, when the flames had not yet reached the house, did they not rescue more
items? Why was there this paralysis of the will?'
Even if they had done a more efficient sweep of 3276 Deronda Drive, though, there's
always a danger they would have saved items no more biographically significant
than suits and violins. And there's something admirable about Huxley's refusal to be
crushed by the obliteration of a large part of his past. The biographer sheds more
tears than his subject. Asked by Sybille Bedford how he had coped, Huxley replied:
'One goes out and buys a toothbrush.'
Murray's other frustration is Bedford herself, who published in 1973-4 a two-volume
authorised life of Huxley that has acquired something like classic status. Poised
between the last days of whitewash and the current vogue for destructive biography,
it was intimate and sympathetic without being uncritical. Murray has had access to
some new material, but sometimes he overstates its importance, simply because it
allows him to step out of Sybille Bedford's warm shadow.
There is substance to some of the novelties, particularly a long correspondence
between both Huxleys and Mary Hutchinson, known in the history of Bloomsbury as
the lover of Clive Bell. Aldous was shy and impractical, not the sort of man who
could manage adultery without help from his wife. The correspondence with Mary
Hutchinson makes clear that Maria was not merely complicit but actively
'omnifutuent', to borrow her husband's splendid word for bisexuality.
The connection between the women seems to have been stronger than anything that
happened between Mary and Aldous, though he was certainly smitten. In the
Huxley household, love was routinely triangular. For Maria at least, the excitement
was partly to do with the idea of sharing Mary. In one strange letter of 1925, Maria
writes to her: 'Aldous has just come into my bed & he smelt so strongly of you still
that it made one giddy.' This would be perverse enough without the element of
fantasy added by distance in time and space. When Maria wrote that letter, she and
Aldous were in Belgium, Mary in London.
Sybille Bedford was not ignorant of Maria Huxley's involvements, and her omission
of it from her biography may have been self-preserving as well as discreet, to judge
by the comments by May Sarton which Murray reproduces in a footnote: 'Maria
Huxley, you know, tamed women for Aldous. The young tigress, you know, she
broke them in. Sybille what's her name who wrote about Aldous was both Aldous's
and Maria's lover.' Even so, the new material doesn't greatly alter the picture of the
marriage painted by Bedford - passionately loyal, intensified by any apparent
distractions.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/apr/07/biography.highereducation1 2/4
02/12/2021, 23:37 Aldous and his women | Biography books | The Guardian
Murray's subtitle is 'An English Intellectual', as if to acknowledge that Huxley's
standing as a writer of fiction has suffered since his death. Certainly it isn't easy to
insist on the achievement of a novelist who disclaimed any great affinity with the
genre. Brave New World, where the pessimism balances the tendency to preach, is
the only certain survivor of his oeuvre.
Huxley's Englishness is, in a sense, self-evident, his Eton-Balliol-Bloomsbury
formation the confluence of privileges which created the voice described by Robert
Craft as a 'lambent, culture-saturated purr', the sheer, blithe opinionation that
allowed him to come up with formulas like 'Penang has a certain Sicilian air', but he
spent a third of his life based in America.
It's not that there was anything necessarily cowardly about the Huxleys leaving
Britain in 1937 (near-blindness had already disqualified him for one world war), but
Murray makes too much of their vicarious suffering in America. It's presumptuous,
on the basis of his seeming drawn and strained to a visitor in 1940, to compare
Aldous with Shakespeare's Miranda ('I have suffered with those I saw suffer'). 'It was
as if the Huxleys, apparently in fortunate exile in the sun, had taken on themselves
the anguish of their family and friends in Europe.'
His judgments elsewhere are more robust. He quotes Huxley on Kafka as a corrective
to Huxley's own fictional practice: 'In a work of art, a truth is always a beauty-truth;
and a beauty-truth is a mystical entity, a two-in-one; the truth is quite inseparable
from its companion, so that you can only state in the most general terms what its
nature is.' He quotes eloquent dissenting judgments made in Huxley's lifetime, the
reservations expressed by Woolf and Isherwood, and the splendidly laconic account
of him given by a bookseller friend of Lawrence's: 'Aldous he sit and make remark.'
Murray seems to have escaped the biographer's occupational hazard of
disillusionment with his subject, but his readers may not. Huxley's great virtues are
so consistently nibbled at by their opposites, his rationalism by wishful thinking, his
liberalism by his attraction to eugenics and disapproval of universal free education.
Above all, Murray should have steered clear of the formula - 'For Huxley, the
personal was the political' - applied to a man who railed against the barbarising
effect of the cinema but for years filled his pockets with the screenwriting dollar.
Article count on
You've readin the last year 5 articles
… as you're joining us from Greece, we have a small favour to ask. Tens of millions
have placed their trust in the Guardian’s high-impact journalism since we started
publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty,
solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million readers, from 180 countries, have
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/apr/07/biography.highereducation1 3/4
02/12/2021, 23:37 Aldous and his women | Biography books | The Guardian
recently taken the step to support us financially – keeping us open to all, and
fiercely independent.
With no shareholders or billionaire owner, we can set our own agenda and provide
trustworthy journalism that’s free from commercial and political influence,
offering a counterweight to the spread of misinformation. When it’s never
mattered more, we can investigate and challenge without fear or favour.
Unlike many others, Guardian journalism is available for everyone to read,
regardless of what they can afford to pay. We do this because we believe in
information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of global events,
understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take
meaningful action.
We aim to offer readers a comprehensive, international perspective on critical
events shaping our world – from the Black Lives Matter movement, to the new
American administration, Brexit, and the world's slow emergence from a global
pandemic. We are committed to upholding our reputation for urgent, powerful
reporting on the climate emergency, and made the decision to reject advertising
from fossil fuel companies, divest from the oil and gas industries, and set a course
to achieve net zero emissions by 2030.
If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or
small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Guardian from
as little as €1 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us
with a regular amount each month. Thank you.
Single Monthly Annual
€6 per month €10 per month Other
Continue Remind me in January
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/apr/07/biography.highereducation1 4/4
