CRG Garment Guide A4 1 Page
CRG Garment Guide A4 1 Page
Garment Specifications........................................................................................ 04
Size Charts..................................................................................................................14
Easy Ordering............................................................................................................18
FABRIC SPECIFICATIONS........................................................................................19
Garment Recommendations............................................................................... 27
01
Performance Measurement.................................................................................. 32
Fabric Selection.......................................................................................................36
Bioburden Testing................................................................................................... 37
Water Testing............................................................................................................ 37
Particle Counting.....................................................................................................38
Sterilisation............................................................................................................... 40
PROCESS CLASS B
POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED
GARMENTS PROCESS CLASS
02
PROCESS CLASS D
CLEAN ROOM GARMENTS | GARMENT GUIDE
STERILISED
RENTAL
PURCHASE
CLEAN ROOM GARMENTS | GARMENT GUIDE
6418 UNDER GARMENT TOP 6422 UNDER GARMENT PANT
FABRIC FABRIC
UNDER GARMENT (WY)....... GSWY6418 UNDER GARMENT (WY)....... GPWY6422
04 100% polyester (knit) with ECF stripe 100% polyester (knit) with ECF stripe
SEAMS FEATURES
Overlocked seams
CLEAN ROOM GARMENTS | GARMENT GUIDE
Elasticised waistline
SIZES SEAMS
XXSM - 5XL Overlocked seams
COLOUR SIZES
WY Navy XXSM - 6XL
COLOUR
WY Navy
6411 UNDER GARMENT TOP 6412 UNDER GARMENT PANT
FABRIC FABRIC
UNDER GARMENT (ZC).................. GSZC6411 UNDER GARMENT (ZC).................. GPZC6412
100% polyester twill hi-stretch with moisture finish 100% polyester twill hi-stretch with moisture finish 05
FEATURES FEATURES
®® 100% continuous filament polyester sewing thread ®® 100% continuous filament polyester sewing thread
®® Adjustable stainless steel clip closure at ankle ®® Adjustable stainless steel clip closure at ankle
6727 COVERALL
FABRIC
ULTRASHIELD (US)................ GOUS6727
100% polyester with ECF stripe 07
FEATURES FEATURES
®® Zip front opening ®® Deep front pockets
®® Stainless steel clips at neckline ®® Elasticised drawstring waist
®® Mandarin collar SEAMS
®® Knitted wrist cuffs Overlocked seams
®® Raglan sleeves SIZES
®® Suitable to wear when dealing with XXSM - 6XL
cytotoxic drugs (UltraShield only) COLOUR
SEAMS SL Royal Blue, Aqua, Grey
Overlocked seams US Lemon, Green, Purple
SIZES
XXSM - 6XL
COLOUR
SL Royal Blue, Aqua, Grey
US Lemon, Green, Purple
6279 OPEN FACE HOOD 2190 SLEEVE PROTECTOR
FABRIC FABRIC
ULTRASHIELD (US)................ GHUS6279 ULTRASHIELD (US)................ GHUS2190
100% polyester with ECF stripe 100% polyester with ECF stripe 11
100% polyester with ECF stripe 100% polyester with ECF stripe
FEATURES FEATURES
®® Suitable to wear when dealing with cytotoxic ®® Suitable to wear when dealing with cytotoxic
drugs (UltraShield only) drugs
®® Vinyl sole ®® Vinyl sole
SEAMS SEAMS
Overlocked seams Overlocked seams
SIZES SIZES
XSM - 2XL XSM - 2XL
COLOUR COLOUR
US Purple, Lemon, Green US Lemon, Purple, Green
PE Blue, Lemon, Navy, White IN Navy
6988 OVERSHOE 6989 OVERSHOE
FABRIC FABRIC
ULTRASHIELD (US)................ GFUS6988 ULTRASHIELD (US)................ GFUS6989
100% polyester with ECF stripe 100% polyester with ECF stripe 13
A
C
C B A
15
C B
B
16
CLEAN ROOM GARMENTS | GARMENT GUIDE
A LENGTH 42
B TOP DIAMETER 27
C OPENING DIAMETER 20
A1
D
17
6987, 6988, 6989 6986
A HEIGHT - 6987, 6988, 6989 47.0 47.0 50.8 50.8 57.2 57.2
B OPENING WIDTH - 6987, 6989 45.7 45.7 48.3 50.8 50.8 50.8
PURCHASE
CODE FABRIC DESCRIPTION SIZES
RENTAL
PAGE
PB PCG PD LBB LD
UNDER GARMENTS
COVERALLS
STAT COATS
LAB COATS
GOWNS
SMOCKS
FACILITY GARMENTS
CLEAN ROOM GARMENTS | GARMENT GUIDE
HOODS
SLEEVE PROTECTORS
OVERSHOES
Cleanliness Category I I
Cleanliness Category I I
0 washes 90.3%
25 washes 96.6%
50 washes 98.0%
75 washes 96.9%
Drugs 20 min 30 min 60 min 20 min 30 min 60 min 20 min 30 min 60 min
% Penetration 0 0 0 NA NA NA 0 0 0
LOW BIO BURDEN FABRIC (SL)
Cleanliness Category I I
21
Colour range Blue (BP), White (WP), Navy (NP), Lemon (LP)
Cleanliness Category II II
Cleanliness Category I I
Cleanliness Category II II
Cleanliness Category II II
Cleanliness Category II II
Cleanliness Category II II
Cleanliness Category II II 23
Cleanliness Category II II
Cleanliness Category I I
250 washes 8
1X10 -1X10
12
Ώ (Static Dissipative)
Cleanliness Category I I
Cleanliness Category I I
25 washes 99.0%
50 washes 99.5%
75 washes 99.3%
26
®® The US Federal standard 209E (classes 1 to 100 000)
CLEAN ROOM GARMENTS | GARMENT GUIDE
maximum particles/m3
FED STD 209E
Class equivalent
≥0.1um ≥0.2 um ≥0.3 um ≥0.5 um ≥1 um ≥5 um
ISO 1 10 2
ISO 2 100 24 10 4
GARMENT
GARMENT SERVICE YOUR FACILITY ROOM GRADE FABRIC CLEANING GARMENT CHANGE
PROCESS STYLE RATE
Polycotton
Static sensitive areas
with Electro
Statguard Dust Coats Assembly Test & repair N/A Launder Only Statcoat Weekly
Conductive
Packaging
Fibre (ECF)
®® Garment Cleaning Process refers to the surface cleanness level of the garment as specified in IEST-RP-CC003.4 Garment System Considerations for
Cleanrooms and Other Controlled Environments
FACTORS LIMITING
30
CLOTHING &
CLEAN ROOM GARMENTS | GARMENT GUIDE
FACE-MASK
PERFORMANCE
Penetration and leakage can reduce the protective performance of cleanroom clothing.
Penetration can be regarded as passage of materials through holes in the protective equipment.
Such holes can occur in fabrics, filters, seams or fasteners. Leakage can occur at any point
at which there is a gap between the equipment and the wearer’s body or face. Face-mask
performance can similarly be limited by penetration of the filter and leakage between mask and
face.
Clothing penetration and leakage result from pressure differences between the inside and outside
which are generated by body movement. For example, when raising and lowering arms, voids
open up between the body and the clothing. Airflow into the garment can contaminate the body
and airflow out of the garment can contaminate the environment. The pressure differentials
generated, and thus the transfer of contaminants, depend on both the air permeability of the
garment and the goodness of fit.
FABRIC PENETRATION
Conventional clothing fabrics such as cotton, nylon, terylene or spunbond have numerous small
holes through the fabric. Objective tests of such fabrics using respirable asbestos fibres or small
particles indicate that over 50% of such particles penetrated through the fabrics. Fabrics giving
such test results are essentially “transparent” to fine aerosols such as bacteria, skin scales or
other contaminants and are therefore unsuitable unless only marginal performance is required.
WOVEN FABRICS
MADE FROM 100% CONTINUOUS FILAMENT POLYESTER FIBRE
The fibres of the garment must be fine and tightly woven, which reduces the air permeability of
the garment. The air permeability is a function of the space between the woven fibres. Polyester
is a synthetic fibre that is hydrophobic which means it will not absorb moisture and will not
allow moisture such as perspiration to evaporate. Natural fibres such as cotton are hydrophilic,
this means they absorb moisture and are more comfortable to wear but shed high levels of
contaminants. Polyester garments are durable, wash well, dry quickly and are the most suitable
fabric for the cleanroom environment.
GARMENT MANUFACTURE
Unsealed stitched seams and fasteners such as Velcro or conventional zips offer little resistance
to either airflow or aerosol penetration. In many garments, the air permeability of seams and
fasteners is much greater than that of the fabrics. Consequently, although the area of seam and
fastener is typically less than 1% of the total area of a garment, the total flow of contaminated air
through seams and fasteners can be much greater than that through the fabric, particularly if the
fabric is relatively impermeable to air.
Clean Room Garments manufactures its garment seams to exacting standards to help prevent
this happening. Seams are “French Seam” stitched; the seams are overlocked, stitched again to
encase the overlock, then stitched down onto the garment.
31
LEAKAGE
Studies of cleanrooms have shown this to be a common occurrence. For example, when a
cleanroom is occupied by personnel, microbial contamination increases greatly even when
personnel wear surgical masks in addition to cleanroom clothing. Coveralls, hoods and boots
worn as a set only reduce by half the airborne contamination produced when just smocks and
boots are worn, and gowns worn with head covers reduce the contamination level by only 19%.
From the above it will be appreciated that it is not adequate to specify cleanroom clothing in
terms of fabric performance only, it is necessary to specify fabric, seam and fastener penetration
and suit-seal leakage. While it might appear that protective performance could be increased
by providing better seals, sealing can cause thermal discomfort or heat strain by preventing or
reducing air exchange.
FILTRATION EFFICIENCY
Filtration efficiency of fabrics is the main method by which the particle exclusion performance
of fabrics can be measured. Fabric is placed on a fabric holder with the inside surface up, pulled
flat and clamped into place with an o-ring and the top of the holder. A pump draws air through
the fabric and particle count samples of air are taken from the air outside and inside the fabric
holder. The filtration efficiency is the amount of particles filtered from the air by the fabric when
compared to unfiltered “control” air, expressed as a percentage. A brief explanation of these
results follows the table below:
32
FABRIC FILTRATION EFFICIENCY %
0.3um 0.5um 1.0um 5.0um
CLEAN ROOM GARMENTS | GARMENT GUIDE
Fabric A 70 79 88 95
Fabric B 69 74 87 99
The air permeability test is carried out by clamping fabric into a sealed holder, then creating
a constant pressure gradient across it. Once the desired pressure is reached and has become
stable, the volume of air required to be pumped into the “upstream” side of the fabric to
maintain this pressure gradient is measured, in ml of air per second. Then, with the area of
fabric clamped into the holder taken into account, the mean air permeability is calculated,
expressed as ml of air per square cm of fabric per second (ml/cm2.s)
The water vapour transmission test is done by weighing an amount of water into a container,
sealing the fabric to be tested over the mouth of the container (normally using hot melt
33
glue), then placing the container and fabric into an environment with controlled temperature
and humidity for a length of time. The amount of water, in the form of evaporating water
If sufficient heat cannot be lost, heat is stored in the body and the
body’s core temperature rises. Moderate heat storage can cause
thermal discomfort, which although not directly health threatening, can
cause loss of attention which could result in reduced quality of product.
Severe heat storage can progressively result in cramps, coma and death.
Cleanroom workers often have to wear coveralls, hoods, gloves and face
masks which substantially reduce the area of skin off which heat can be
lost by convection, radiation or sweat evaporation. In 15°C environments,
wearing gloves and headcovers reduces the body’s ability to lose heat
by 10 to 50%. In addition, face masks absorb heat and moisture from the
exhaled air which is transferred to the inspired air, thus reducing heat
loss by breathing.
The types of organisms found can tell us a lot about the source of the
contamination on the fabrics, as most of them are found almost exclusively
in water, people or just general dust. High counts of the water types may
indicate that the garments were not dried properly, or that the water is not
particularly clean, while high counts of organisms associated with people
may indicate that the garments were not washed particularly well, or that our
operators were not isolated well enough from the environment.
37
We have a limit of 100cfu per ml, which is based on the USP guidelines for
process water at point of use.
38
FABRICS
AS1807.19 is based on a method developed by the ASTM (American Society for Testing and
CLEAN ROOM GARMENTS | GARMENT GUIDE
Materials) in 1968, and has remained basically unchanged over the last 30 years. In simple terms,
the method involves sucking or vacuuming particles from a set portion of the garment surface
onto a filter membrane clamped into a holder. The membrane is then placed under a microscope
and the particles on it are counted according to a statistical formula to arrive at a result per
0.1m2. The process is laborious, but provides a very accurate indication of the level of particle
contamination on the garment in question.
An alternative method for determining particle contamination on materials is the Helmke Drum
method, which is also called the tumbling or rotating method. Garments are placed in a rotating
drum that is open at one end and tumbled to release particles from the fabric. An automatic
particle counter samples the air within the drum to determine the particle density of the air.
There are arguments for and against each method. The Helmke Drum test is much simpler to
perform than the AS1807.10-2000 method, but is only useful in tracking the performance of
the laundering process, or to compare similar materials. It is no indication of the quality of the
garment itself. Garments, especially larger ones like smocks and coveralls, also have a tendency
to “ball” in the drum, which results in less particles being released by the tumbling process and a
lower than expected count.
The AS method is more subjective, as the operator must determine what is or isn’t a particle on a
membrane surface that is often covered with various creases, shadows and other imperfections.
There is also a limit to the size of the particles that are visible at the magnification used. Even
at 100x, particles smaller than 5um are effectively invisible, hence the standard’s reliance on this
size level for specifications. As the Helmke Drum classifications are based on 0.5um particles, the
results of the two tests have no correlation at all.
CLEANROOM MONITORING
To assess the cleanliness of clean cabinets, isolators, and rooms, particle concentration
larger than a given size is determined by either microscopy (for larger sizes) or an optical
particle counter. For speed, cost and statistical validity, assessments are usually carried out
with an optical particle counter.
Modern optical particle counters provide data on a number of different sizes simultaneously
which are displayed on an internal screen and may be saved using a printer, or downloaded
to a PC and manipulated by a spreadsheet program into tables to be interpreted at a later
date.
CRG’s cleanroom is a vertical flow room and classed as a Grade B PIC’s guide to good
manufacturing for medicinal products (GMP) (ISO Class 5).
The facility is certified annually by a third party NATA certified testing service to Australian
Standards. The testing service verifies that the airflow velocity changes the air in the room
often enough (air change rate), that there are no pinholes in the filters (filter integrity),
and that the pressures being maintained in the room is enough to prevent particles from
entering (room integrity).
We also monitor all rooms with continuous particle counters (FMS). Results are compared
to AS/NZS14644.
FACILITY MONITORING
Although it is necessary for a clean area to be regularly tested, such testing only indicates
the level of cleanliness at a point in time, often when normal (particle producing) operations
are not taking place.
One way of achieving more regular monitoring is to install a Facility Monitoring System. A
Facility Monitoring System is an arrangement of instruments linked to a central monitoring
computer. The computer controls the intake of data from the various devices and logs and
displays the information, reporting to the operator any changes in conditions or trends.
The inputs to the Facility Monitoring System may be from numerous sources. In clean areas
the optical particle counter data may be transferred to the computer. Alternatively, particle
counters linked to scanning manifolds (an array of tubes connected to a single APC) may be
installed. Environmental conditions such as differential pressure, airflow velocity, temperature
and relative humidity often play an important part in ensuring quality. These may also be
monitored using appropriate sensors and the data collected via the PC/software.
individual cycle. The gas permeable bags have an ETO chemical indicator printed
on them so we have a visual indication that the bag has been through the steriliser.
Proof of sterilisation for us is having all of the cycle parameters met (temperatures,
pressures, gas weights, times, clear BI’s, etc.). This is documented on an approved
cycle record by a QA Representative.
Certificates of Sterilisation are available for all cycles on the CRG website
www.cleanroom.com.au. Written procedures exist for non-conforming lots, where
the cycle is re-processed or recalled in the unlikely event it has already left.
CHIPPING &
BARCODING
CRG aims to identity chip all garments and mops going through our
cleanroom processing facility. This provides CRG and clients with the
ability to track where their garments are and how many times they have
been returned to CRG for washing and/or sterilisation. This information
is then stored on CRG’s database and can be accessed by a customer’s
Key Account Manager.
This removes the risk of barcodes being damaged or unreadable. The
chips are sewn into the garment / mop so there will be no change in
comfort or quality standards of the item.
Where chips can not be offered, a barcode is used.