Business Communication - Case - A REPLY SENT TO AN ERRING CUSTOMER
Business Communication - Case - A REPLY SENT TO AN ERRING CUSTOMER
MARKS: 80
NO. 3
ARVIND PANDEY CAUGHT IN BUSINESS WEB
Arvind Pandey is a project manager at Al Saba Construction Company in Muscat. It
s a flourishing company with several construction projects in Muscat and abroad. It is known
for completing projects on time and with high quantity construction. The company’s
Chairman is a rich and a highly educated Omani. A German engineer is Arvind’s Vice –
President for urban and foreign construction projects.
Three months ago, Al Saba had submitted a tender for a major construction project in
Kuwait. Its quotation was for $ 25 million. In Kuwait the project was sponsored and
announced by a US – based construction company called Fuma. According to Al Saba, their
bid of $ 25 million was modest but had included a high margin of profit.
On 25 April, Arvind was asked to go to Kuwait to find out from the Fuma project
manager the status of their construction proposal. Arvind was delighted to know that Fuma
had decided to give his company. (Al Saba) the construction project work. The project
meant a lot of effort and money in planning the proposed construction in Kuwait.
But before Arvind could tank the Fuma project manager, he was told that their bird
should be raised to $ 28 million. Arvind was surprised. He tried to convince the Fuma
project manager that his (Arvind company had the bast reputation for doing construction
work in a cost effective way . However, he could always raise the bid by $ 3 million. But he
wanted to know why he was required to do so.
The Fuma manager’s reply was, “That’s the way we do our business in this part of the
world, $ 1 million will go to our Managing Director in the US, I shall get $ 1 million, you,
Mr. Pandey, will get $ 1 million in a specified account in Swiss Bank.
Arvind asked, “ But why me ?”
“ So that you never talk about it to any one.” The Fuma Project Manager said.
Arvind promised never to leak it out to any one else. And he tried to bargain to raise
the bid by $ 2 million. For. Arvind was familiar with the practice of “ pay – offs” involved in
any such thing. He thought it was against his loyalty to his company and his personal ethics.
Arvind promised the Fuma project manager that the bid would be raised to $ 28
million and fresh papers would be put in. He did not want to lose the job.
He came back to Muscat and kept trying to figure out how he should place the whole
thing before his German Vice President. He obviously was at a loss.
Questions :
1. Analyse the reasons for Arvind Pandey’s dilemma.
2. Does Arvind Pandey really face a dilemma ?
3. In your view what should Arvind Pandey do ? Should he disclose it to his
German Vice President ?
NO. 4.
COMPANY ACCEPTING A CONTRACT
A computer company was negotiating a very large order with a large size corporation.
They had a very good track record with this client.
In this corporation, five different departments had pooled their requirements and
budgets. A committee was formed which had representation from all the departments. The
corporation wanted the equipment on a long lease and not outright purchase. Further, they
wanted all the hardware and software form one supplier. This meant that there should be
bought – out items from many suppliers since no one supplier could meet all the requirements
of supply from its range of products.
The corporation provided an exhaustive list of very difficult terms and conditions and
pressurized the vendors to accept. The computer company who was finally awarded the
contract had agreed to overall terms that were fine as far as their own products were
concerned but had also accepted the same terms for the brought – out items. In this case, the
bought – out items were to be imported through a letter of credit. The percentage of the
bought – out items versus their own manufacture was also very high. One of the terms
accepted was that the “system” would be accepted over a period of 10 days after all the
hardware had been linked up and software loaded.
The computer company started facing trouble immediately on supply. There were
over 100 computers over a distance connected with one another with software on it. For the
acceptance tests, it had been agreed that the computer company would demonstrate as a pre-
requisite the features they had claimed during technical discussions.
Now, as you are aware, if a Hero Honda motorcycle claims 80 km to a litre of petrol,
it is under ideal test conditions and if a motorcycle from the showroom were to be tried for
this test before being accepted, it would never pass the test. In corporation’s case, due to
internal politics, the corporation persons from one department – who insisted on going
exactly by the contract – did not sign acceptance since the “ system” could not meet the ideal
test conditions.
Further, in a classic case of, “ for want of a horse – shoe, payment for the horse was
held up”, the computer company tried to get the system accepted and payment released. The
system was so large that at any point of time over a period of 10 days something small or the
other always gave problems. But the corporation took the stand that as far as they were
concerned the contract clearly were concerned the contract clearly mentioned that the
“system” had to be tested as a whole and not module by module.
Questions :
1. Comment on the terms and conditions placed by the corporation.
2. What factors influenced the computer company’s decision to accept the
contract ?
3. Was it a win – win agreement ? Discuss ?
NO. 5
EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW OF R P SINHA
Mr. R P Sinha is a MBA. He is being interviewed for the position of Management
Trainee at a reputed company. The selection committee’s is chaired by a lady Vice –
President. Mr. Sinha’s interview was as follows :
Committee : Good morning !
Mr. Sinha : Good morning to Sirs and Madam !
Chairperson : Please, sit down.
Mr. Sinha : Thank you (sits down at the edge of the chair, keeps his portfolio on the table)
Q. Chairperson : You are Mr. R. P. Sinha
A Sinha : Yes, Madam. This is how I am called.
Q. Chairperson : You have passed MBA with 1st Division.
A. Sinha : Yes, Madam.
Q. Chairperson : Why do you want to work in our organization ?
A Sinha : It is just like that. Also, because it has good reputation.
Q. Member A : This job is considered to be quite stressful. Do you think you can manage the
stress involved.
A. Sinha : I think there is too much talk about stress these days. Sir, would you tell clearly
what you mean by stress ? I am very strong for any stress.
Q. Member B : What are your strengths ?
A. Sinha : Sir, who am I talk boastfully about my strengths. You should tell me my strengths.
Q. Member C : What are your weaknesses ?
A. Sinha : I become angry very fast.
Q. Member A : Do you want to ask us any questions ?
A Sinha : Yes Sir ! What are the future chances for one who starts as a management trainee ?
The member tells M. Sinha the typical career path for those starting as Management
Trainee. The Chairperson thanks Mr. Sinha. Mr. Sinha promptly says in reply, “you are
welcome,” and comes out.
Questions :
1. Do you find Mr. Sinha’s responses to various questions effective ? Give
reasons for your view on each answer given by Mr. Sinha.
2. Rewrite the responses that you consider most effective to the above questions
in a job interview.
3. Mr. Sinha has observed the norm of respectful behaviour and polite
conversation. But, do you think there is something gone wrong in his case ?
Account for your general impression of Mr. Sinha’s performance at the
interview.
NO. 6
Comment on the form and structure of the
Report.