Beyond IR Thermography: How Continuous Thermal Monitoring Improves Performance and Equipment Protection
Beyond IR Thermography: How Continuous Thermal Monitoring Improves Performance and Equipment Protection
Executive summary
For many years, scheduled infrared
thermography inspections have been the
accepted method for reducing the risk of fire
by identifying faulty or loose connections in
electrical distribution systems. Continuous
thermal monitoring offers a safer, more
effective way to detect thermal risks on a
system-wide, 24/7 basis. The method also
delivers up to a 10:1 return on investment due
to avoided equipment damage and downtime.
Schneider Electric White Paper 2
Introduction In 2017, Atlanta’s Hartsfield airport experienced an electrical fire caused by a failure in a
piece of switchgear. Located in a tunnel beneath the airport, the fire crippled both the main
power system and its backup.1 Delta Airlines say they lost up to US$50 million in revenue
because of the power outage. They had to cancel over 1400 flights.2
Every year, electrical fires produce devastating consequences in all kinds of facilities. For
Thermal inspection critical buildings like hospitals, airports, or data centers, major financial losses, injuries, and
standards even deaths can be the result.
In the US, multiple Electrical fires are not uncommon. They account for 22 percent of workplace fires.3 In
regulatory bodies have hospitals, electrical fires have been identified as the number one cause of fires after
set standards for cooking-related incidents.4
thermal inspections.
The NFPA 70B standard Defects in medium voltage (MV) and low voltage (LV) distribution system wiring and
is one example. switches, or defects in motors, are often the source of electrical fires.5 According to the
National Electrical Testing Association (NETA), one major insurance carrier estimates
See the references that approximately 25 percent of all major electrical failures are due to loose or faulty
section at the end of this connections.6
paper for a selected list
Consequently, many insurance companies, the National Fire Protection Administration
of standards.
(NFPA), and many other regulatory bodies require annual thermal surveys to reduce this
risk. Driven by these requirements, thermal surveys have become general practice to
mitigate the risk of faulty connections in all kinds of buildings.
Figure 1
Electrical fires are
devastating for critical
power facilities, in terms
of damages, downtime,
injuries, and loss of life.
1 ‘Atlanta airport mess: How does this happen?’, CNN Money, December 2017
2 ‘Delta says it lost up to $50 million because of the Atlanta airport power outage’, Business Insider, December 2017
3 Electrical Contractor Magazine, “Fire in the Workplace”, 2004
4 ‘Hospital Fires (2012-2014)’, NFIRS Data Snapshot, FEMA
5 ‘Fire in the Workplace’, EC&M, 2004
6 ‘Top Five Switchgear Failure Causes’, NETA World, 2010
Up until now, thermal surveys have been performed using infrared (IR) thermography
technology. Though this method is effective when done in compliance with regulations,
surveys are performed only on a scheduled basis. And as each test is necessarily
performed in close proximity to live electrical equipment, personnel can be put at risk.
This paper will discuss the emergence of continuous thermal monitoring technology.
Compared to IR thermography, this method offers a safer and more comprehensive way to
detect thermal risks across an entire medium and low voltage electrical distribution system.
The causes of A major cause of failure in MV and LV installations is faulty electrical connections,
especially connections made on-site.
electrical fires Cable, busbar, and withdrawable circuit breaker connections can start to deteriorate
due to loose connections caused by improper tightening torque or constant vibrations
over time. Deterioration can also occur because of damaged surfaces due to corrosion,
excessive pressure, or excessive friction.
Early detection of abnormal busbar temperature rises caused by faulty connections will,
in most cases, prevent electrical failures and fire. Therefore, insurance companies and
regulatory bodies now require thermal inspections to be performed regularly, addressing
the highest-risk parts of electrical distribution systems.
Traditional IR The most common and traditional approach for thermal inspections is carried out using IR
thermography. A thermal camera is used to inspect areas of the electrical equipment that
thermography represent the highest thermal risks.
Figure 2
IR thermography is
a manual, scheduled
approach that uses a
thermal camera to test
for temperature increases
at high-risk points within
MV and LV switchgear.
An IR window in the
switchgear door provides
camera access.
Finally, manually-conducted IR thermography surveys are costly. Even so, the return
on investment can be high. According to an article by Cody Jackson, an experienced
thermographer with JTI Services in Massachusetts, IR thermography inspections, when
followed by timely repairs, can provide a US$4 benefit for every US$1 value of the IR
inspection. This is because infrared inspections can catch symptoms of problems before
they cause equipment failure.7
Figure 3
Typical thermographic scan
of cable connections inside
of electrical switchgear,
showing increased
heating on one of the three
connection points.
Continuous Continuous thermal monitoring is a relatively new solution that offers several advantages
over IR thermography, with even greater potential ROI.
thermal In contrast to the manual, interval-based approach of IR thermography, thermal monitoring
monitoring is performed continuously. Abnormal temperature rises or thermal runaways are detected
in real-time.
A post-event analysis
Thermal sensor technology for low-density MV and LV
revealed that the bolts connection points
securing many of the There are two recent innovations to use for continuous thermal monitoring applications:
busway joints were not
properly torqued during 1. Thermal sensors
assembly. Over time
this created a thermal This technology relies on permanently installed sensors on individual connection
‘avalanche’ effect that points. This is best suited for low-density applications with few connection points.
eventually caused a joint Thermal sensors are installed on all important connection points and other thermal risk
to fail. The review also locations throughout the electrical distribution system. This can include:
identified the inadequacy
of IR scans to identify hot • MV switchgear. Sensors should be located on incoming cables, busbar, and withdrawable
spots at busway joints. circuit breaker connections.
Sensors can be designed for dedicated thermal monitoring. Some may offer additional
capabilities, such as humidity monitoring.
IDD requires only a single smart sensor to be located at the top of each column or
cabinet. The sensor analyzes gas and particles, taking advantage of the behavior
of cable insulation decomposition during a thermal runaway situation, detecting
this abnormal condition before any smoke or insulator browning occurs. The sensor
detects an overheating problem with any cable inside that column of the cabinet,
enabling a solution that is more simple and quicker to install and integrate.
Note that thermal sensors can be a good complement to IDD technology, with the former
used on all larger lower-density connection points, and the latter used for smaller high-
density cable connections within LV cabinets.
Figure 4
Typical installation of
thermal sensors on (A)
busbars, (B) IDD, and
(C) busway
A B C
Communications architecture
It would simply not be practical to manually check the temperature readings of each
permanently mounted sensor regularly. Wireless connectivity enables 24/7 monitoring,
with constant scanning of all sensors to detect abnormal temperatures.
LAN
Figure 5
Typical thermal monitoring Wireless Data Concentrator and
Communications Interface with
system showing wireless data processing8
sensors feeding data to
cloud-hosted and on-site
Thermal Thermal Thermal
analytic applications sensors sensors sensors
Thermal
sensors
Alarming and
erty of Schneider Electric
One of the key benefits of continuous thermal monitoring is near real-time alarming. If
a sensor reading shows an abnormal temperature rise at any connection point or in the
analytics insulation of any cable, an alarm will be generated at the software level. The software can
be configured to immediately send a notification to the mobile devices of local operation
and maintenance teams.
One data concentrator can monitor one or more equipment depending on their physical separation.
8
Figure 6
Thermal monitoring
screen showing status of
networked thermal and
environmental sensors,
with alarm conditions
highlighted in red
Figure 7
Thermal trend graph
showing an abnormal
temperature rise on one
phase of a transformer.
Case study:
Harbor terminal
One of the largest
shipping terminals in the
western Mediterranean
needed the highest
safety and reliability for
two secondary power
distribution substations.
A complete power Beyond the improved accuracy offered by the current level-based temperature modeling
management system noted above, thermal analytics may also provide a phase-to-phase comparison. This can
was installed, featuring help further differentiate and isolate a problem, for example, if one phase of a 3-phase
thermal monitoring on transformer starts to exhibit a thermal runaway condition. In this particular example, if the
cable connections, with transformer has not completely failed, load shedding could be implemented to reduce the
data integrated with load on that phase to a safer level until a transformer replacement can be scheduled.
the SCADA and asset
management systems.
Outsourced services
The solution helps Many of the newest cloud-based power and energy management solutions allow for
predict potential failures data sharing with outsourced expert services. As part of this strategy, facility teams can
to maintain uptime outsource thermal monitoring tasks. A contracted third-party maintenance service that
and increase safety provides analytic and advisory services can monitor multiple facilities from a central
while improving asset operations center.
management efficiency.
Increased ROI When compared to IR thermography, continuous thermal monitoring offers a significant
increase in return on investment over time. The following is a cost comparison example for
ten MV switchgear cubicles.
Table 1 Price
* Based on 1 visit every 2 years, €1000 per switchboard per visit, over a 20 year lifetime.
In this example, IR thermography costs approximately 2.5 times more than thermal
monitoring over a 20-year lifetime. Based on the 4:1 cost-benefit analysis of thermal
surveys by JTI above, the resulting ROI for continuous thermal monitoring would be
approximately 10:1. Therefore:
This, of course assumes that any identified issues are followed up with timely repairs.
As previously noted, the recent Atlanta Hartsfield airport incident resulted in close to
US$50 million in losses for Delta Airlines. Adding in all other airlines, the overall damages
were most likely well over US$100 million. This makes it easy to justify many millions in a
thermal monitoring solution to avoid a similar incident in the future.
Wireless continuous thermal monitoring is the best way to detect abnormal temperature
Conclusion rises in any electrical distribution infrastructure before they lead to equipment failure,
major financial losses or worse, loss of human life.
Over the typical 20-year lifetime of most switchgear, continuous thermal monitoring is estimated
to be 2.5 times more cost-effective than IR thermography. It is also a safer alternative, as it
avoids the need to expose personnel to live equipment and the risk of arc flash.
In terms of improving reliability and uptime, a thermal monitoring system identifies thermal
issues that arise faster than the typical IR scanning intervals. It also provides higher
accuracy in identifying thermal risks when offering current level-based temperature
modeling and phase-to-phase comparisons. And near real-time alarming enables service
teams to respond quickly to risks before downtime and damage can occur.
Dominique Chabert
Dominique is in charge of offer creation for medium voltage products and MV/LV transformers including
integration with the EcoStruxure Power program. He has held various positions in R&D, Marketing, and
Project Management for the Contracting and Medium Voltage departments for Schneider Electric.
White papers
‘Using Infrared (IR) Thermography to Improve Electrical Preventive Maintenance Programs’
New gas and particle sensing technology detects cables overheating in LV equipment
Schneider Electric
© 2021 Schneider Electric. All Rights Reserved.
998-20425658 Rev 1