Managing Classroom Behaviour 2016
Managing Classroom Behaviour 2016
classroom
behaviour
A publication commissioned by ATL from Chris Watkins
Professional
development series
Trainee NQ /
probationer
ATL is the union for education professionals across the UK.
Active in the maintained, independent and post-16 sectors,
we use our members’ experiences to influence education
policy, and we work with government and employers to
secure fair pay and working conditions. From early years to
HE, teachers to support staff, lecturers to leaders, we support
and represent our members throughout their career.
To join or check our competitive rates, including special offers for students and newly qualified members, visit
www.atl.org.uk/join or call 0845 057 7000.*
* Terms and conditions available online. Local rates apply.
Already a member? You’ve joined us, now join in and get on. Getting involved with your union is
the best way to achieve effective change, both in working conditions and in education. And it can enhance your
professional development too.
There are many ways to get involved, from giving your views on education policy to attending one of our training
courses or becoming the ATL rep for your workplace. Look up www.atl.org.uk/getinvolved for more.
Contents
Foreword 2
Preface 3
Some starting thoughts about the context 3
Using this publication 4
The language and style of this book 4
Some basic principles underlying this book 4
1. Introduction 5
The big picture on behaviour 5
Schools make a difference 6
Different schools make different differences 6
Understanding the classroom 7
Key features of the classroom situation 7
Explaining difficult behaviour 8
Why reactive approaches are not effective 8
A word about punishment 9
6. Other resources 28
Foreword
Behaviour management remains a key issue for all teachers and education support staff.
This publication has been produced to support ATL members in the challenges they face
in managing the behaviour of children and young people in the classroom.
ATL is committed to the view that educators have a key role to play in managing the
behaviour of all children, which is not always an easy task, particularly when children
exhibit threatening or violent behaviour.
This publication addresses the issues of what can be done about difficult behaviour in the
classroom and offers strategies for making sense of an individual’s behaviour. As always,
ATL is here to offer you support and guidance via your school rep, branch secretary or
ATL’s London office if further help or advice is required.
Many teachers and education support staff complain that support and training for the
core task of classroom management doesn’t meet their needs. Coverage of behaviour
management is inconsistent in initial teacher training, nor is it adequately addressed
in INSET programmes. This is why ATL has gone further; as well as producing this
publication to support members, ATL also runs a number of sector-specific behaviour
management courses that members can attend as part of their ongoing continuing
professional development. Courses include Behaviour management and Managing
extreme behaviour, which offer strategies for managing demanding situations as they
arise in the classroom. ATL also provides support for members regarding SEN, which
often impacts strongly on classroom behaviour. We have produced a practical publication
entitled Achievement for all with helpful support for school staff, and we make high level
policy representations to Government on SEN and behaviour.
Further details and booking information on all ATL’s courses can be found at
www.atl.org.uk/learningzone or by contacting ATL’s training department by email at
www.atl.org.uk/learning or by calling 020 7782 1582.
Dr Mary Bousted
General secretary
Please note that throughout this publication, the text refers to and addresses ‘the teacher
working in the classroom’. However, the information and advice featured in Managing
classroom behaviour will also be of direct relevance to the work of other staff who are
directly involved in the delivery of education.
2 Foreword
Preface
This publication takes the perspective of classroom staff, ie the teacher and
support staff, in addressing classroom behaviour. In some ways it contrasts
with publications which take more of the perspective of the senior manager
or policy-maker. It offers ideas and frameworks for all classroom staff to
consider when faced with difficulties which may arise in classrooms. In that
way it supports professional reflection and development. It is not guidance
on what to do in an emergency in your school, nor is it legal guidance.
There are a number of reasons for looking at this Nevertheless, many classroom staff feel that
issue in more detail. behaviour is deteriorating. That feeling is real and
is worthy of concern. What is clear is that some
•• From regular surveys with teachers, we know that
responses to difficult behaviour have become more
managing classroom behaviour remains a key
used. For example, despite the use of strategies
issue for staff across schools.
such as managed moves, the number of temporary
•• Media’s reporting of negative school behaviour and permanent exclusions is still worryingly high.
grows ever more intensive, with negative impacts But this cannot be taken at face value as a direct
on public views of schools, pupils and staff. reflection of changed pupil behaviour. Rather, it can
•• The availability of adequate support and training be seen as a reflection of the reactive approach
on classroom management, behaviour and SEN encouraged by central Government policy-making
has often been ‘hit and miss’ as it competes and legislation over a number of years.
against school improvement priorities and training
It also relates to the growth of pupil referral units.
on Government edicts.
The picture is therefore one of an escalating
•• A weighty curriculum and assessment system, situation where increasingly reactive provision is put
high-stakes accountability and inter-school in place. When such a process has been started it is
competition can lead to increasing isolation and difficult to stop, without an explicit reversal of policy.
stress for teachers, which sometimes shows up in
more reactive attitudes towards pupil behaviour. The education system is now more divided and
divisive than a decade ago, thanks to forces such as
•• The decline of external services and local
increased marketisation of schools and the resulting
structures which support multi-agency working
competition between them. This competition is likely
undermines informed and proactive approaches
to undermine strategies such as managed moves
to some levels of pupil need and its impact on
which, when handled well, provided an alternative
classroom behaviour, particularly those within the
to permanent exclusion for pupils. Undoubtedly,
SEN range.
this has had an impact on how matters of difficult
behaviour are handled; there is a more widespread
Some starting thoughts about
sense that exclusion is an acceptable response and
the context in the process, some young people are losing their
Is school behaviour getting worse? If we believed right to full-time education.
only what we see in the media we might think that
behaviour in schools is deteriorating, but there is
no research which could provide us with evidence
that pupil behaviour is becoming worse, or better
for that matter.
Preface 3
Using this publication Some basic principles
The main section, ‘What can I do about difficult underlying this book
behaviour in my classroom?’, offers you a series Teaching is a highly skilled activity which makes a
of considerations and possible lines of action, but real difference. One of the differences it makes is to
is not a book of recipes. The order of the ideas is pupils’ behaviour. Reactive approaches to difficult
from the immediate to the longer term, beginning behaviour can, and do, make matters worse.
with incidents then moving to patterns in classroom
behaviour. When behaviour is a concern, it is often effective
to identify and examine the patterns which exist
Ideas for spotting those patterns are given on in that behaviour. Patterns in school behaviour,
page 15, linking to the other headings in the text. even sometimes in a single incident, draw our
In this way you should find the most relevant attention to a range of influences. It is useful to
considerations for your concerns. consider these influences and to recognise them at
Although this book was not designed to be read individual, classroom and organisational level. This
from cover to cover, you might find value in reading book focuses on the classroom level in the main,
areas which are not your most immediate concern; with brief reference to patterns at individual and
single sections have less impact on their own, and organisational levels.
their context is always important. It is not the sort
of publication which is peppered with references,
but each of the ideas and almost every paragraph
is linked to well-researched studies. Individual
4 Preface
1. Introduction
‘Young people today think of nothing but themselves. They have no
reverence for parents or old age.’ Who said that? Peter the Hermit. When?
1274. And we could quote from even earlier sources to remind us that the
behaviour of young people is an age-old concern. This is not to minimise
that concern, but to set it in context.
There are real concerns which we share about The big picture on behaviour
some young people’s behaviour because it may on
Behaviour in most schools is good. The national
occasion damage them, their relationships, their
picture from inspection reports regularly shows this.
education and chances of a satisfying future or, in
But it is a different picture to that which is portrayed
the worst examples, it may demonstrate the damage
in some sections of the press. Such reports have
which has been done to them.
a role in amplifying deviance. As a result, many
But it is pretty difficult to hold on to those concerns people in the UK believe there is much more crime
about pupil well-being when someone is behaving than there actually is in the country as a whole,
in a way that we find rude or aggressive, or when and difficulties in pupil behaviour are especially
we feel they are personally attacking us, or when distorted. The problem is that people do seem to
we feel they demonstrate zero deference. All of this believe such accounts. The media paint a portrait
can happen with pupils in classrooms, and with of schools where teachers are regularly subject to
colleagues in the staffroom! intimidation and assault. Yet this is not the case from
So how can we keep all the concerns in an effective available records. Research and teacher surveys find
balance? By continuing to keep things in context, that the behaviours that teachers most often deal
and by illuminating the behaviour which concerns with are repetitious low-level forms such as ‘talking
us, and our response to it. This section looks at the out of turn’, ‘calculated idleness or work avoidance’,
context by concentrating on three aspects: ‘hindering other pupils’ or ‘making unnecessary
(nonverbal) noise’; all of which are frustrating and
•• understanding ‘the big picture’ on school stressful, but they are not the level of difficulties
behaviour more frequently reported.
•• understanding the classroom
It is useful to consider what purpose is served by
•• looking at ways of explaining difficult behaviour. amplifying a problem. Such amplification promotes
a distorted picture, and action based on such a
picture can bring about a deterioration rather than
improvement to a situation. In many staffrooms
there are voices which seem to amplify difficulties,
and it is sometimes difficult to know how to
respond. One approach is to seek clear evidence to
place alongside their view, so that whatever action
follows is based on fact, not just feeling. So what are
the facts on school behaviour?
Introduction 5
Schools make a difference
The behaviour which pupils display in school is
not always a simple reflection of their behaviour
elsewhere, including at home. When teachers and
parents report on the same children at home and
at school, there is comparatively little overlap in the
difficulties identified. Further, most teachers know
model pupils who they have later found to live
under very adverse home circumstances. 3. Schools with teacher collaboration have better
behaviour.
Different schools make In collaborative settings, teachers share
different differences information about particular students to find ways
Different schools have different overall effects, to help the student learn more effectively. When
independent of the make-up of their student intake. they have a particularly difficult problem with a
Some schools are high excluding schools, some student, they seek help widely, and look for causes
have high levels of truancy, and so on. Key staff in and then solutions. In contrast, teachers in isolated
different schools vary in the extent to which they settings share information about students by
believe that the problem of disruptive behaviour is swapping stories about a child’s errant behaviour
within the power of schools to resolve. These beliefs or sympathising with one another. For them,
are crucial for they inform action and can become problems invariably means behaviour problems,
self-perpetuating. It is suggested that higher rates and punishment is seen as the solution.
of difficulty and exclusion are to be found amongst 4. Schools that promote pupil autonomy have better
those schools with lower confidence in their own behaviour.
powers to tackle the problem. So when explaining Schools that promote self-discipline and active
difficult behaviour, we cannot leave the school out involvement in the learning process, and show an
of the picture. Aspects of it as an organisation need interest and concern for pupil development, do
to be engaged. The four statements below use key well. In contrast, schools that generate a climate
research studies. of conflict, with severe punishment and a sense
1. P
roactive schools have better behaviour. of constant tension, or schools that generate a
Schools which aim to pre-empt and prevent libertarian climate with low severity of punishment
difficulties do well. They recognise they contribute and a lack of self-direction are both linked with
to the patterns of behaviour in the school, take high levels of misbehaviour.
steps to understand and analyse such patterns,
and intervene through preventive approaches
Where does the school in which you
at organisational, classroom and individual
presently teach figure on these four
level. Reactive schools can experience further
statements?
deterioration in response to reactive practices.
Your thoughts may help you notice
2. S
chools with a strong sense of community have something important at the overall level,
better behaviour. notwithstanding important differences
Schools that form tight communities do well. They within the school.
give attention to how students feel affiliated to the
school, they provide a rich spectrum of adult roles,
and adults engage with students personally and
challenge them to engage in the life of the school.
Teachers display a ‘diffuse’ teacher role, having
frequent contact with staff and students in settings
other than the classroom.
6 Introduction
Schools that promote self-discipline
and active involvement in the
learning process, and show an
interest and concern for pupil
development, do well
Introduction 7
Explaining difficult behaviour
Schools vary in terms of the predominant
Whenever we describe or explain behaviour, the
explanations used. Think about
way we do it can display certain trends and effects.
conversations in your school when pupil
For example, we explain other people’s behaviour
behaviour is discussed. The conversations
in terms of them as people, but we explain our own
could be in meetings, in passing, general
behaviour in terms of the situation(s) we’re in. When
conversation, in case conferences and so
we describe to ourselves or to others, or explain
on. Leave out coffee break conversations,
difficult behaviour displayed by another person,
which are more about letting off steam
there is a range of language that we might use.
than explaining! Which of the above
Given below are five general ‘explanations’, each
‘explanations’ predominates and to
with a few particular examples.
what effect?
‘They’re that sort of person’
‘Jeremy is an aggressive boy’
‘She’s an attention-seeker’ In some cases, they may be used in an attempt
‘He’s a special needs kid’ to pass on a problem, but that is not a positive
goal. Similarly, if they function to gain agreement
‘They’re not very bright’
or support from a few colleagues, this may be
‘They can’t cope with the work’
a doubtful gain. We need to remember that
‘They’re frustrated in class and mess around’
each ‘explanation’ may signal a factor in difficult
‘It’s just a tiny minority’ behaviour, but that it is not a simple fact.
‘There are just some key ring-leaders’
‘A few rotten apples’ Why reactive approaches are
‘It’s their age’ not effective
‘It’s their hormones’ Reactive approaches tend not to be effective.
‘It’s adolescence; they have to challenge authority’ By ‘reactive’ we mean any approach that focuses
‘This is a difficult neighbourhood’ on action after an incident. For example, staffroom
‘The parents don’t support us’ conversations of the form, ‘What do you do if they
do X?’ Another example would be, ‘If they do X
Clearly, the above forms of language may serve we’ll do Y’. In each case, the person adopting this
to express frustration, or even to maintain public approach is being led by the person doing ‘X’ – in
image amongst colleagues. But their over-use has this way they’re not exercising optimum control. At
negative effects. They externalise and off-load, but the level of classroom incidents, detailed research
by the same token they divert attention away from shows that the reactive approach to incidents, usually
the contribution made by the school, and thereby involving threats or hard commands, is four times
disempower us. Indeed, some classroom staff have less likely to lead to the situation being resolved. All
reported that language in this form contributes difficult incidents require some degree of negotiation.
to lower morale and may leave us stuck with the At the broader classroom level, one detailed series
problem. of studies concluded: ‘The action classroom staff
take in response to a ‘discipline problem’ has no
consistent relationship with their managerial success
in the classroom. However, what classroom staff do
before misbehaviour occurs is shown to be crucial
in achieving success’. Hence, our attention should
turn to the management of the classroom and the
management of learning.
8 Introduction
True proactiveness comes from
seeing how we contribute to our
own problems
Introduction 9
2. What can I do about
difficult behaviour in
my classroom? ?
This section contains various suggestions for action (and inaction) on the
part of a classroom teacher experiencing difficult behaviour. Not all of
these suggestions will be appropriate for your situation and not all will
be appealing to you as a teacher. Nor will all of these suggestions work,
especially if we take that to mean producing obedience!
Indeed, anyone who felt they had to do all of what Think about the following options for the
follows would be overwhelmed straightaway. But if classroom staff:
you use these suggestions to set you thinking about
1. ‘Timothy, stop being childish and give Rosemary
the situation you know and find difficult, and
her ruler back.’
if you select and modify the suggestions to your
own situation, there may be some value gained. 2. ‘Timothy, we ask before borrowing in this
classroom.’
There is a very real problem about the ordering of
this section. It starts with what seem to be the most 3. ‘Timothy, you’re quite able to get on with your
immediate considerations: what to think about and work, so return Rosemary’s ruler and let her do
do in a difficult interaction. The problem is that this the same.’
might appear to promote a ‘What do I do if they do These three simple options have both similarities
X?’ mentality, which is exactly the sort of reactive and differences. They are similar in that they all
approach which does not work. Somewhat better indicate to Timothy that the teacher has noticed his
would be to ask the proactive question ‘How can behaviour and decided it is inappropriate. In that
I create a classroom where these things don’t sense they may all serve to mark a boundary on
happen?’, which is considered in the latter parts behaviour. But they also have differences:
of this section. This section deals with incidents
first and then moves to classroom patterns and 1. has elements of judging the person, negatively
classroom community. 2. points to an agreement previously made
to respond rather than react The impact of these different styles, if generalised
over time, can be quite marked. Style ‘1’ can be
Styles of responding counterproductive in terms of improving behaviour
Consider the following classroom situations: because it may build up resentments; it may be
the style of the ‘deviance-provocative teacher’ (see
Timothy grabs Rosemary’s ruler and appears to page 15). Style ‘2’ can be effective if it is set against
hide it from her. a background of making and reviewing agreements
regarding classroom behaviour. Style ‘3’ makes 7. Statement of the consequences of the deviant
the important link with what we aim to achieve in conduct: ‘I won’t bother to read if you go on like
classrooms, it reaffirms our purpose. But style ‘1’ this.’ ‘Someone will get hurt if this equipment is
is quite prevalent in our classrooms and the most left lying here.’
frequently occurring teacher comments are very
8. Warnings and threats: ‘I’m going to get annoyed.’
brief: ‘Stop it’ and ‘Shut up!’
‘You’ll be in detention.’ ‘I’ll send you to the head.’
9. Evaluative labels of the pupil and his/her conduct:
Think about your responses to small-scale incidents. ‘Stop behaving like a baby.’ ‘Don’t be daft.’
What messages do they convey:
10. Sarcasm: ‘We can do without the singing.’ ‘Have
• about the pupil? you retired?’
• about the classroom climate and control?
• about the purposes in your classroom? 11. Attention-drawers: ‘Sandra!’ ‘Girls!’ ‘5C!’
Feel Think Do
Classroom patterns
Identifying the patterns in
classroom difficulty
Many ‘solutions’ which are proposed for difficult
behaviour in classrooms are not based on a
diagnosis of the situation. They are favourite
solutions which may or may not work.
The following questions attempt a starting
diagnosis based on the extent of difficulty, and
therefore provide a more particular focus. Given the
complexity and connectedness of classrooms, an
accurate linear diagnosis will not be forthcoming.
Is there a particular classroom which is causing you •• The multi-dimensional nature of classroom
concern? life needs recognition. Classroom staff who try
to keep the rest of life outside the door operate
Analyse the following features of this classroom.
less effective classrooms. The rest of life can
•• Physical setting: layout of furniture, positioning be acknowledged and sometimes linked to the
of seats, resources, lighting, display, etc. Do any learning.
of these seem linked to the difficulty? If so, can •• The simultaneity of classroom events demands
you experiment with some aspect? Remember skills of selective ignoring. Effective classroom
that managing the physical setting is one of staff are effective at deciding what to overlook.
the teacher’s key skills, but they often de-skill They give a ‘smooth’ performance, which
themselves by saying that someone else ‘wouldn’t maintains a sense of momentum, and conveys
like a change on this front’. the sense that they are steering the events. By
•• Social structure: the groupings of pupils, the contrast, the individual who does not use such
patterns of working together, rationales given, etc. skills well gives a ‘lumpy’ performance, responding
Is there any link to the difficulty? If so, can you to something here then something there so that
imagine some modification to try out? Re-grouping momentum is lost and the events seem to be
using some random process can be useful now and in control. Sometimes our own approaches to
again, to break patterns which may have become managing the classroom constitute interruptions,
unproductive. Re-teaching the skills of working and disturb the flow in a non-productive way!
together can be important. Reviewing the rationales •• The unpredictability of classroom life has to be
for group work can be needed. recognised and accepted as well as managed.
•• Psychological setting: this is mainly managed Here routines and rituals are useful and need to be
through the type of activities in the classroom established and reviewed with each class.
and the way they are conducted. The busyness
is managed through timing and pacing of
Are there any of these preventive skills you
activities. Too few activities can lead pupils to
wish to enhance? Can you observe colleagues
seek diversion, too many can get them confused.
in their handling of these aspects?
The transitions between classroom activities
can be unstable periods which need effective
orchestration. They are well handled when
preceded by some advance warnings: ‘There
are three minutes before we return to the whole
group’, ‘We’ve been working on this experiment
for 10 minutes now so you should be about half
way through’.
•• The public aspect of classrooms can create
difficulties if it becomes exaggerated. It is
constructive to have private interchanges in the
classroom, including with those pupils whose
behaviour concerns you. The sense of being on
stage declines as the relationship with a group
develops.
Goals
What suggestions emerge about how
Resources Teacher’s to improve the activity where difficulty
role occurs? Identify a manageable experiment
you will undertake. Anticipate some of
the things which might work against the
change you’ve planned. How will you cope
Time and
pacing with them?
Grouping:
•• promote and support cooperative group learning
and the skills in peer interaction
•• use mixed and varied grouping arrangements,
helping pupils learn from the experience in
different groupings.
Upward
Making sense of behaviour Power/
Dominance
in groups
Upward Forward
Sometimes it seems that a group of pupils is
associated with difficult behaviour on a regular
basis. If it is a class group, the first issue to Negative Positive
consider is the stage this group has attained in Forward
Liking
its development. Is it: by others
Backward
•• inclusion and membership? Negative Positive
Contribution
Pupils seeking to find a niche for themselves in to task Liking
the group, with much focus on comparisons. by others
Backward Downward
•• influence and collaboration?
Testing the authority of the teacher and Contribution
to task
establishing the group dominance and work
patterns. Downward
Cynic Socialiser
Hard
worker
Team
follower
Cynic Socialiser
Loner
Team
follower
Mascot
Loner
Mascot
Group interventions may aim to:
•• reduce negative dominance of some members in
the group
•• increase participation of the isolated members in
the group
•• promote broader learning about social skills such
as working in groups.
Remembering that collaborative schools have Finally, other professionals may be of help and
better behaviour, it is useful to ask how teachers building up links with health and social care
can collaborate to improve behaviour. Generally, agencies, alongside educational psychologists,
teachers seek sources of help which: is always useful. It is worth remembering that
responsibility for outcomes for children and young
•• give rapid pay off
people with SEN is shared across agencies and
•• are practical and extend repertoire collaborative working is the most effective way of
•• have been devised by fellow practitioners or ensuring the best outcomes. Local authority schools
adapted locally should have access to centrally organised services,
•• are flexible and open to further adaptation and independent schools and academies may have
•• are near at hand, easy to access, and above access to freelance specialist organisations on an
all continuous. ‘as and when’ basis. However, as schools move
away from local authority control the nature of
This means we need to think of arrangements additional support and its delivery is likely to alter.
where pairs of colleagues who choose each other If you are unsure what is available locally you could
can set up joint observation and feedback for their approach your ATL branch secretary who may be
own problem solving. Such partnerships have to able to put you in touch with local networks.
be set up with care. Partners need to establish
guidelines and agree on their responsibilities to one
another and to others who may have an interest or Which of your colleagues would you choose to
involvement in the work. start developing collaborative work with?
In a similar vein, colleagues in schools regularly say
that there’s no more potent a learning experience
than to track a pupil around the lessons/activities
that constitute his/her day. Such work starts to build
up a constructive shared language for discussing
classrooms, and acceptance of differences between
teachers in a school. When this has happened, it is
also likely that the staff will gain a great deal from
‘cause for concern’ meetings about individuals and
groups. These may need some careful structuring
at first, ensuring that all voices are heard in a
constructive way.
Different schools make different differences to the Perhaps that final point is best made by Lord Elton
patterns of behaviour which emerge within them. in a 1992 symposium: “Members of staff who
Research on these differences (page 6) suggests it treat their pupils with discourtesy, impatience or
is profitable for a school to: contempt, or are late for those from whom they
demand punctuality, who scribble illegibly on words
•• become more proactive about difficulty
which they insist must be impeccably clear and tidy,
•• develop a stronger sense of community who will not listen to those from whom they demand
•• promote teacher collaboration absolute attention, who bawl their heads off at those
•• promote pupil autonomy. from whom they demand soft and respectful speech,
who hold up to ridicule those whom they instruct
This implies working towards policies which help the
to treat all men with respect, or who treat any of
school monitor and learn codes which promote an
their own colleagues with anything but courtesy
effective community, resources for teachers to work
and respect in the presence of any of the pupils,
together and respect for a wide range of learners.
are suffering a painful and obvious discontinuity of
If some of the above are being worked for, we may
logic.” (‘Responsible parenting requires a responsible
get nearer to a situation in which both teachers and
society’, Cross-Sector Symposium on Parenting and
pupils are learning the same things about behaviour
Society, the Queen Elizabeth Conference Centre,
in their school:
London, 13 October 1992.)
•• it pays not to react
•• it pays to care about the organisation
•• it pays to work together
Different schools make different
•• it pays to be responsible.
differences to the patterns of
This is in marked contrast to the worst of cases behaviour which emerge within them
where there are double standards for pupils and
classroom staff, and cases where the message
seems to be that bullying works – between
classroom staff as well as between pupils.
28 Other resources
Found this helpful? ATL has lots of other resources – all free to
members – that you might be interested in:
© Association of Teachers and Lecturers 2011. All rights reserved. Information in this publication may be reproduced or quoted only with
proper acknowledgement to the author and the Association.
ATL – the education union ATL product code: PED01
7 Northumberland Street Date: 2016
London WC2N 5RD Edition: fifth
ISBN: 1 902466 14 4
Tel: 020 7930 6441 twitter.com/atlunion Price: £8.99 (non members)/free (members)
[email protected] facebook.com/atlunion
www.atl.org.uk
Cardiff Belfast
Tel: 029 2046 5000 Tel: 028 9078 2020
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]