.- _““__.

”
_._ .-. .1 ~

Indian Standard
( Reaffirmed 1999 )

GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN OF

UNDER-SJZEPAGE CONTROL MEASURES
FOR EAR’TH AND ROCKFILL. DAMS

UX 627.824.04:624.13:.64

@ Copyri,oht 1977

BURiEAU OF INDI’AN STANDARDS

MANAK BHAVAN, 9 ~AHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARC.
I
NEWDELHI 110002
/

Cr 5 November 1977

.
 IS : 8414- 1977
( R4Th-nwd 1993 )

Indian Standard
GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN OF
UNDER-SEEPAGE CONTROL MEASURES
FOR EARTH AND ROCKFILL DAMS

Foundation and Sub-structure Sectional Committee, BDC 52

Chairman

SHRI K. R. DATYF:
Rehem Mansion No. 2,
44 s. Bhagat Singh Road, Colaba,
Bombay 400039

Members Rejxesenting
SHRI R. N. BANSAL Beas Designs Organization, Nangal Township
SHRI B. K. BERI Engineer-in-Chief’s Branch, Army Headquarters
SHRI S. N. PAN~E ( Alternat8 e)
SHRI N. M. CHAKRABORTY Damodar Valley Corporation, Dhanbad
SHRI R. K. CE~UDRRY Bhakra Management Board, Nangal
SHRI R. K. BHASLN ( Alternate )
CHIEF ENGINEER & SPECIAL Public 1Vorks Department, Government of Gnjarat
SECRETARY TO TEE GOVBRN-
MENT OF GUJARAT
SUPERINTENDING ENGIN~FII ( Alternate )
SHRI A. B. JENA Irrigation & Power Department, Government (f
Orissa
SHRI N. G. JOSHI Supa Dam Construction, Public \vorks & Electricily
Department, Government of Ka:.na+;lka
%GWTOR( ERDDD )’ Central Water Commission, New Delhi
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ( ERDDD ) ( A!ternate )
SHR~ A. H. DIVANJI Rodio Foundation Engincc,ing Ltd nnd Hamrat &
Co, Bombay
SHRI A. N. JANGLE ( Alternate )
SHRI G. D. MATIIUR Public Works Department, Government of L:t:,r
Pradesh
SHRI A. D. NAR~IY Roads Wing, Ministry of Shipping & Transport
SHRI B. K. PANTHAI(Y Hindustan Construction Co Limited, Bombay
SHR~ D. M. Savun ( Alternate )
SHKI M. R. PlTNJ.4 Cementation Co Limited, Bombay
SHnI S. .ML*tiRERJul~ ( ffh?X&? )

@ Copyright 1977
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
This publication is protected under the Indian Copyright Act ( XIV of 1957 ) and
reproduction in whole or in part by any means except with written permission of the
publisher shall be deemed to be an Infringement of copyrlght under the saiU Act.
-.I
IS : 8414- 1977

( Continued from page 1 )

Members Representing
SRRI S. A. REDDI Gammon India Limited, Bombay
SHRI S. N. PINHEIR ( Ak?rnnk )
SRRI J. RAJA RAO Publ~ra~~s~ks Department, Government of Andhra

DR J. PURUSHOTHAM ( Alternate )
SHRI E. R. SaLDANHA Irrigation & Power Department, Government of
Maharashtra
SRRI v. P. SHIlPI ( Altern& )
SERI P. B. SRINIVASAN Geological Survey of India, Calcutta
SHRI K. C. C. RAJU ( Alternate )
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER Rajasthan Canal Project, Irrigation Department,
Government of Rajasthan
SHRI D. A.TITHA SIXHA, Director General, ISI ( Ex-&cio Mrmbrr )
Director ( Civ Engg )

Secwtar_,,
SRRI G. RAGMAN
Deputy Director ( Civ Engg ), ISI

-*
.’

2
 IS : 8414 - 1977

Indian Standard
GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN OF
UNDER-SEEPAGE CONTROL MEASURES
FOR EARTH AND ROCKFILL DAMS

0. FOREWORD
0.1 This Indian Standard was adopted by the Indian Standards Institution
on 31 March 1977, after the draft finalized by the Foundation and
Substructure Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil
Engineering Division Council.
0.2 Seepage control measures are required to protect a dam from any
undesirable or dangerous effects of seepage, occurring through the dam
itself or through the foundations, abutments and junctions with the
masonry/concrete portions and outlet or spillway structures. The
measures adopted may or may not reduce seepage quantities, but fore-
most, the measures should minimize the risk of failure from instability of
slopes, from foundation heave or from piping by erosion or by a
combination of these.
0.3 Although the control of seepage throughand underneath embankments
are treated separately, it should be realised that effective treatment of
seepage requires consideration of the embankment, its foundation and
the abutting or adjoining structures as a unit.
0.4 Internally, most earth and rockfill embankments require some form
of seepage control, either to improve stability or to control piping or both
and/or to reduce the quantum of seepage. In earth embankments, progres-
sive zoning, horizontal drainage/filter mats inclined or vertical
(chimney) drains and toe drains provide seepage control in the body of
the dam.
0.5 The measures of under-seepage control to common usage are (a)
positive cutoff formed in an open excavation to an impervious stratum
which is backfilled with compacted impervious material, (b) concrete
cutoff walls, (c) grout curtains, (d) slurry trench cutoffs ( earth backfilled),
(e) sheet piles, (f) upstream impervious blankets, and (g) verticaldrains
or relief wells and Alter trenches. The measures best suited for any
particular project depend upon many factors, but in general, the safety
of the embankment shall be insured and, in addition, the type of treat-
ment should be justified on the basis of economic considerations. In many
instances, consideration of the various requirements leads to adoption of
not one, but several types of seepage control measures.

3
IS :8414-1977
0.6Designing and detailing of the drainage system for the embankment
should be closely co-ordinated with the designing and detailing of the
under-seepage control system. Dimensions and layout of drainage gallery,
vertical drainage trenches, drain holes and relief wells should be carefully
dovetailed into corresponding features of the embankment, to ensure the
most positive control of seepage. Design and detailing of the core and
impervious zones of the embankment should also be similarly coordinated
with the arrangement and dimensions of the impervious elements of the
under-seepage control system, such as cutoff trench, grout curtain,
blanket, etc.
0.7 Certain aspects of under-seepage control measures are also covered
by the following standards:
IS : 4999-1968 Recommendations for grouting of pervious soils
IS : 5050-1968 Code of practice for design, construction and main-
tenance of relief wells
IS: 6066-1971 Recommendations for pressure grouting of rock
foundations in river valley projects
0.7.1 The following Indian Standards which are under preparation
will also cover certain other aspects of the subject:
Code of practice for design of grout curtain and drainage systems in
earth and rockfill dams
Code of practice for design and construction of diaphragm for under-
seepage control
Guidelines for design of large earth and rockfill dams

0.a In the formulation of this standard due weightage has been given to
international co-ordination among the standards and practices prevailing
in different countries in addition to relating it to the practices in the field
in this country.

1. SCOPE
1.1 This standard covers the general guidelines for design of under-
seepage control measures for earth and rockfill dams.

2. C&$NERAL PRINCIPLES FOR DESIGN OF UNDER-SEEPAGE

CONTROL MEASURES

2.1 Provisions for seepage control have two independent functions:

namely, reduction of the loss of water to an amount compatible with the
purpose of the project, and elimination of the possibility of a ‘failure of
the structure by piping. Many dams have been in successful service for

4
 IS : 8414 - 1977

decades in spite of losses of water. Therefore the first step in rational

design of seepage control measures is to estimate the largest quantity of
water that may escape if no attempt is made to intercept percolation. In
many instances it would be found that interception of the most conspi-
cuously pervious zones would be sufficient and cost of further reducing
the loss of water would not be justified in terms of value of water retained.

2.2 The quantity of seepage can be reduced by interception of pervious

zones by means of impervious barriers, such as grout curtains, cutoff
trenches, diaphragms or by lengthening the path of seepage by providing
a blanket.

2.3 The safety of a dam with respect to a failure by piping is not neces-
sarily related to the amount of water that escapes from the reservoir.
Large losses of water may be associated with a high degree of safety
against piping. Hence, the me--W eliminating the danger of piping
require independent consideration. The danger of failure of a dam by
piping increases rapidly with increasing values of the hydraulic gradient
at which the water pwcolates through the ‘impervious’ portion of the
dam and along the contact between this portion and the natural ground.

2.4 Junction of earthfill with rigid structures, such as envelop junctions

of earth and masonry dams, retaining wall junctions, intersection of
outlet conduits and cutoff trench arc particularly vulnerable to piping.
Apart from the paths of preferential seepage provided by such junctions,
cracking due to differential settlement is another major cause of internal
erosion. Abutment contacts where the foundation profile is irregular
and/or steep are also vulnerable to piping.

2.5 In certain cases piping can be prevented by providing properly

designed relief wells and drainage trenches in conjunction with filter/
drainage mats and inclined filters. If the subsoil is fairly homogeneous
and well graded, the installation of these features is a routine operation.
Entrainment of soil particles by seepage flows can be prevented without
much difficulty by adopting accepted practices for dimensioning and
detailing of the drainage system. However, if the subsoil contains strata
of very fine uniform sand or rock flour overlying strata of clean sand or
gravel subsurface, erosion may develop along the boundary between the
two types of material. The most difficult and unfavourable con@Mtions
are encountered in ice or water-laid sediments having an erratic pattern
of stratification and containing layers and lenses of very fine sand or rock
flour in direct contact with coarse-grained and very pervious materials.
Similarly vulnerable areas arise when hill talus and boulders occur in
proximity of unconsolidated deposits.

5
IS : 8414 - 1977

2.6 Filter trenches in combination with inclined or vertical filters and

horizontal filter mats constitute a means of arresting internal erosion.
The filter trench, the horizontal drainage blanket as well as inclined and
vertical filters through the embankment should be detailed carefully to
constitute a continuous system for interception of possible paths of
internal erosion.

2.7 Whatever the subsoil conditions may be, the means for prevention of
piping should be fully and permanently adequate. Otherwise, sooner or
later a catastrophic failure may ensue. Therefore, the efforts to stop
subsurface erosion should be continued until they are successful. In
some instances, observations during the first filling of the reservoir may
show that minor additions to the original drainage provisions will satisfy
all essential safety requirements. At other sites, on geologically similar
formations, severe difficulties may be encountered.

2.8 If during filling of the reservoir occurrence of springs, boils and

sediment entrainment is noticed corrective measures would have to be
taken which generail-y consist of placement of a filter mat of well graded
pervious material over the zones where excessive seepage is observed,
followed by placement of a loading berm over the filter mat. Generally
the material which can be most easily obtained and transported is used
for the loading berm. Entrainment of particles and boils can be retarded
temporarily by enclosing the boils by a ring bund of sand bags. Such
ring bunds are a purely temporary measure and may often be helpful in
creating suitable working condition for placement of the filter mat and
the loading berm. When it is not possible to obtain material capable of
sat’isfying the filter criteria as well as of adequately high permeability,
gravel and rubble drains may be interposed within the filter mat or
placed over the filter mat.

2.9 Control of seepage through pervious foundation is thus a feature of

major uncertainty in the design of an earth dam. However, in many
geological situations the depth of an extensive impervious stratum can be
established by adopting simple methods of exploration, such as bore holes
and trail pits. If depth of impervious stratum is not excessive a positive
cutoff trench would be preferred in such cases. A positive cutoff trench
formed in an open excavation into the impervious stratum and backfilled
by a compacted impervious earthfill is comparatively free from uncertainty
and requires little observation to ensure satisfactory performance.

2.16 When the depth of the impervious stratum is known but excavation
of positive cutoff trench is not feasible due to excessive depth of the
impervious stratum or construction difficulties like heavy dewatering
requirements, instability of sides of excavation, etc, other measures of
forming a cutoff may be considered. These consist of concrete cutoff
walls placed in slurry trenches, grout curtains or sheet piles.

6
 IS:8414-1977

2.11 When the investigations do not provide definite indications of the

depth and continuity of the impervious stratum or the depth of cutoff is
excessive, consideration should be given to use of an impervious blanket.
Blankets of adequate length in conjunction with relief wells or filter
trenches have been successfully used on major projects. Adoption of a
blanket-cum-relief well system imposes the obligation of maintaining
continuous observation and exercising adequate control in installation of
the drainage system. Inadequacies and uncertainties described in 3.6.3 on
limitations of blankets should be considered before making the selection
of the blanket as the primary measure of seepage control.

2.12 Partial cutoffs can only be considered as a supplementary means of

seepage control since their efficacy is very small both for reducing the
rate of seepage or for reducing the pore water pressure (uplift) in the
downstream areas of the foundation. However, a partial cutoff in the
form of grout curtain may be effective in blocking of zones vulnerable to
internal erosion like pockets of open gravel and boulderi in proximity of
fine grained soil. Sheet pile may also be used as a means of blocking
erosion in sandy and silty strata.

3. MEASURES OF UNDER-SEEPAGE CONTROL

3.1 Positive Cutoff Trench
3.1.1 The positive cutoff trench consists of an impervious fill placed in
a trench formed by open excavation into an impervious stratum. Grout-
ing of the contact zone of the fill and the underlying strata constitutes an
integral part of the positive cutoff. Pockets of such size that compaction
equipment cannot be operated and pot holes with overhangs should be
filled with concrete.
3.1.2 The depth of the positive cutoff trench is governed by the
geological features influencing the configuration of the impervious substra-
tum and the profile of unweathered mass of bed rock. The width end
side slopes are generally selected according to convenience ofconstruction
and to ensure stability of excavated slopes. Detailing of the positive
cutoff near abutments and junctions with structures needs careful con-
sideration, since the efficacy and continuity of the impervious filling ( both
in the cutoff trench and in the core) are compromised by differential
settlement cracks developed near junctions, abutments and foundation
irregularities.
3.1.3 In view of the hazard of transverse cracking and consequent
internal erosion at junctions with rigid structures or next to steeply rising
faces of abutments, an inclined or vertical filter should necessarily be
incorporated in the embankment section for the junction zones irrespective
of the need for such a filter on the embankment section for the entire
dam. When combined with a filter trench provided in the junction zone,

7
IS :8414-1977

the inclined filter and the horizontal drainage blanket should constitute
a complete and continuous interception system blocking all possible paths
of internal erosion. The filter trench should be extended deep enough up
to the upper surface of a foundation strata sufficiently resistant to
internal erosion by virtue of its low compressibility, low permeability and
cohesive strength.

3.1.4 Special attention should be given to backfilling of narrow

trenches formed by excavation for the walls, outlet structures, masonry
dams, etc. The contact of such backfill with the surrounding natural
soil or rigid structure is likely to be poor due to the arching action arising
from higher compressibility of the fill relative to the surrounding subsoil
and the rigid structure. These difficulties can be overcome by use of
plastic concrete backfill comprising coarse and fine aggregate, clay and
a small quantity of cement.

3.1.3 Plastic concrete may also be used in narrow or deep trenches,

excavated by manual labour where compaction equipment cannot be
operated.

3.1.6The cutoff trench should be keyed sufficiently into the flanks if the
depth pervious overburden below the reservoir level is significant at the
of
ends of the dam at the flank. Guidelines regarding this aspect are
provided in the draft ‘Indian Standard Guidelines for design of large
earth and rockfill dams ( under preparation ) ‘.

3.2 Concrete Diaphragm

3.2.1 A single draphragm or a double diaphragm may also be used for
seepage control. Concrete cutoff walls placed in slurry trecch are not
subject to visual inspection during construction, therefore require special
knowledge, equipment and skilled workmen to achieve a satisfactory
construction.

3.2.2 Deformation behaviour of the diaphragm should be analyzed to

ascertain the extent of risk of rupture of diaphragm due to upstream and
down-stream horizontal movements combined with buckling due to down
drag. Special design features would be necessary where such risk is
serious, namely, replacing upper portions of the diaphragm by a positive
cutoff trench, introduction of joints and use of plastic concrete.

3.2.3 By providing two lines of diaphragms and grouting the alluvium

contained between them by tubes with sleeves, the element of uncertainty
regarding the gaps and discontinuities in placement of concrete in slurry
trench and defects in the joints can be minimized. Grouting of the
pervious soil within the diaphragms could be carried out effectively
because of the confinement provided by the diaphragms.
8
 IS :8414- 1977

3.2.4 Limitations of the diaphragm technique can be overcome by

installing precast elements within slurry trenches filled with plastic
concrete. These improvements have, however, not yet been realized in
India during actual execution.

3.3 Grout Curtain

3.3.1 Grout Curtain in Pervious Soils
3.3.1.1 Grouted cutoffs are produced by injection, within the zone
assigned to the cutoff, of the voids of the sediments with cement, clay,
chemicals, or a combination of these materials.
3.3.1.2 An essential feature of all grouting procedures is successive
injection, of progressively finer pockets in the deposit. Inasmuch as
grout cannot be made to penetrate the finer materials as long as more
pervious pockets are available, the coarser materials are treated first,
usually with the less expensive and thicker grouts, whereupon the finer
portions are penetrated with less viscous fluids.
3.3.1.3 Grouted cutoffs are generally effective when seepage occurs
primarily through pockets, zones or layers of coarse materials ( gravel,
boulders and talus ). Coarse sediments with in-situ permeability of
10-l cm/s or above and DIO exceeding O-6 mm can generally be treated
effectively with low cost grouts, namely, clay cement grout. The response
of soils with permeability of the order of IO-’ cm/s and lower and DIO
of 0’3 to 0’5 mm to grouting is uncertain. Silicate grouting has been
effective in some cases for soils of initial permeability ranging from lOwa
to 10-s cm/s. Close spacing of holes and expensive chemical grouts are
required far grouting of soils of initial permeability of 10-s cm/s and
lower. Reference should be made to 5 of IS : 4999-1968* for assessment of
groutability of foundation materials in terms of the grain size distribution.
3.3.1.4 For soil of initial permeability 10-l cm/s or higher, the
final coefficient of permeability of sediments grouted by use of low cost
clay cement grouts lies in the range IO-’ to 10ds cm/s. On the other
hand the difference in pregrouting and postgrouting permeability of
soils having an initial permeability of lo-’ cm/s would be insufficient
for the cutoff to be effective. The width of curtain is another factor
which shall be considered. Wide multiple line curtains would be
required for soils of initial permeability of 10ea cm/s, while a relatively
narrow three line curtain may be adequate for soil of initial permeability
of 10-l cm/s or higher.
3.3.1.5 The sizes and locations of portions of the sediments not
penetrated by the grout are unknown. Yet, if a layer ot’ very fine
untreated sand, for instance, cr )sses the grout curtain, water percolates
through it at high gradients and may erode a gap, Most chemical grouts
are extremely compressible; and some of them are vulnerable to leaching.

*Recommendations for grouting of pervious soils.

9
IS : 8414 - 1977

&out curtains with chemical grout which can withstand seepage

pressure over a long period of time are relatively expensive and the grout
materials are sometimes difficult to procure.
3.3.1.6 In the interest of safety and economy it is generally advisable
to adopt multiple row grouting wherein the outer rows are treated with
cement-clay - bentonite grouts, so that in the inner rows expensive
grout treatment starting with stable grout mixes and ending in chemical
mixes can be adopted which not only forms an effective grout curtain but
also resist erosion and leaching.
3.3.1.7 The result of grouting operations also depends to a large
extent on the skill and experience of the grouting personnel as well as the
understanding and care with which supervision is carried out. The
width of grout curtains ‘should be adequate to contain stray pockets of
fine sand which is not groutable and to ensure that the gradient across
the grout curtain is low enough to ensure that the grout injected is not
eroded or leached by seepage.
3.3.1.8 In view of the above limitations of grout curtains, it may be
necessary to examine the need to provide a second line of defence, such as
blanket plus relief wells. It may often be possible to obtain a blanketing
effect by suitable adaption of the zoning of the dam near the base.
3.3.2 Grout Curtain in Rock
3.3.2.1 Grout curtain in rock admit of routinized treatment if the
purpose is only to block the most pervious zones. These can be treated
by cement grout with suitable admixtures.
3.3.2.2 Concentrated seepage would generally develop at the base of
the positive cutoff. This zone is particularly vulnerable when a narrow
base width is used for the cutoff trench in relation to the height of
the dam. The depth of the grouted zone would be dependent on the
nature of the substrata and their vulnerability to subsurface erosion.
3.3.2.3 In compact rocks with joints having percolation losses of the
order of 100 lugeon or less or mass permeability of 10-s cm/s, grouting is
generally ineffective for control of pore pressures in the downstream part
ofthe dam. In such cases drainage holes formed by continuation of the
relief wells into rock or filter trenches excavated into pervious portions of
the rock would be effective. Details of filter shall be carefully controlled
in order to ensure satisfactory performance of the drainage system. The
relief wells/drainage holes should be at accessible locations to admit of
regular maintenance.
3.3.2.4 The extent of the zone requiring contact zone grouting
depends on the vulnerability of the foundation material to internal
erosion.
NOTE - The criteria for contact zone grouting are dealt with in a separate, draft
Indian Standard on design of grout curtains and contact zone grouting which is
under preparation.
10
 IS : 8414 - 1977

3.4 Slurry Trench Cutoff Walls

3.4.1 A backhoe or dragline excavates a trench through the per-
vious deposits down to suitable impervious materials. A bentonite slurry,
retained in the trench above the existing ground-water level, prevents
the trench walls from caving. After a sufficient length of trench has
been excavated and the bottom suitably prepared, back filling begins.
The physical characteristics of the backfill are specially controlled; in
general, the backfill should be well-graded, impermeable in place, and
sufficiently coarse to minimize postconstruction settlements. A selected
amount of bentonite slurry may be blended with the backfill to improve
its properties. The embankment should be suitably designed to resist
cracking by differential settlement due to the slurry trench.

3.4.2 If the foundation materials are fine grained and overlie well-
graded gravels, the hazards of piping are minimum. Piping may however
occur into open work gravels. It may therefore be desirable to grout
the alluvium in the immediate vicinity of the slurry trench. However,
the slurry trench method is yet to be adopted in India and no Indian
experience is available.

3.5 Steel Sheet Piles

3.5.1 Sheet piles are useful as barrier to arrest internal erosion. But
they have proved to be rather ineffective as a positive means of
controlling seepage through pervious deposits.

3.5.2 Even if sheet pile cutoffs are intact they are not water-tight
because of leakage across the interlocks. In addition the locks may break
because of defects in the steel or when a pile hits an obstacle. Once the
lock is split, the width of the gap increa.ses rapidly with increasing depth
and may assume dimensions of a few metres.

3.5.3 If steel sheet piles are driven to hard rock with a very uneven
surface, a continuous row of triangular gaps may be present between
their lower edges and the rock, or the piles may curl if they are driven
too hard.

3.5.4 It appears difficult to justify the use of sheet piling as a means

of controlling seepage, particularly when other less expensive means are
available which provide the same if not more positive results. Some
methods may be perfected to improve the operating characteristics of
sheet pile cutoffs, such as using vibrating pile driving hammers to reduce
the probability of driving out of interlock and the use of bentonite mud
to seal the interlocks; however, until such time that these techniques
are perfected and become routine, sheet pile walls should be considered
no more effective than partial cutoffs.

11
IS:8414-1977

3.5.5 In barrages the efficacy of sheet piles is primarily due to their

ability to prevent excessive exit gradients in down stream zones vuluner-
able to scour. Sheet piles may also be effective in blocking the path of
direct seepage at the contact of alluvium and rigid concrete floors of
barrages. They also serve as an interception device against internal
migration of soil particles.

3.6 Upstream Impervious Blankets and Relief Wells

3.6.1 Upstream Impervious Blanket
3.6.1.1 If a positive cutoff is not required, or is too costly, an
upstream impervious blanket combined with relief wells in the down-
stream section may be used. Filter trenches supplement relief wells in
heterogeneous deposits and in zones of seepage concentrations. An
upstream blanket may result in major project economies, particularly if
the only alternative consists of deep grout curtains or concrete cutoff
walls. Since alluvial deposits in river valleys are often overlain by a
surface layer of relatively impervious soils, it is advantageous if this natural
impervious blanket can be incorporated into the overall scheme of
seepage control.
3.6.1.2 Feasibility studies for blankets should take into consideration
the increase in the effectiveness of blankets with time as a result of
additional sedimentation in the reservoir. Of course, this would be
particularly important for dams across rivers which carry relatively large
amount of sediment.
3.6.1.3 Following basic requirements should be satisfied while select-
ing the length and thickness of the blanket.
a) Reduction of the quantity of under-seepage to the desired extent.
b) Limiting the exit gradients to the allowable limits for the
substrata encountered.

Subsurface erosion shall also be controlled which may require

supplementary any measures in some cases.
3.6.1.4 The allowable seepage depends on economic considerations;
therefore design decisions are governed by the estimate of seepage which
is in turn dependent on the degree of precision achieved in determination
of permeability. It is advisable to check the permeability values measur-
ed in tests conducted in bore holes or on samples by large scale pumping
tests with piezometric measurements.
3.6.1.5 Effective control of exit gradients can generally be achieved
by a blanket length of about 5 times the head, combined with relief wells
and drainage trenches. A longer length of blanket is generally required
for control of subsurface erosion and for reducing seepage to desirable
limits. It should, however, be noted that there is a limit to the length of
the blanket beyond which it may not be useful.

12
 IS : 8414 - 1977

3.6.1.6 Blanket length required to control subsurface erosion is a

matter of considerable uncertainty. In uniform alluvial deposit without-
open gravel pockets or irregularities giving rise to paths of preferential
seepage, blanket lengths of 10 times head have been found to be adequ-
ate. On important dams blanket lengths should be related to past
practice under similar conditions and where possible provisions should
be made for controlled filling of reservoir in stages. When past experi-
ence is inadequate or knowledge of geology indicates possible hazard of
open zones in proximity with soils vulnerable to subsurface erosion,
supplementary measures of seepage control shall be provided alongwith
the blankets and relief wells. While selecting the length of the blanket
the progressive reduction in efficacy of the increments to the blanket
length especially when the blanket length is large relative to thickness
should be considered.

3.6.2 Relief Wells ( See IS : 5050-1968* ) - Relief wells are an important

adjunct to most of the preceding basic schemes for seepage control.
They are used not only in nearly all cases with upstream impervious
blankets, but also alongwith other schemes, to provide additional assu-
rance that excess hydrostatic pressures do not develop in the downstream
portion of the dam, which could lead to piping. They also reduce the
quantity of uncontrolled seepage Aowing downstream of the dam and,
hence, they control to some extent the occurrence and/or discharge of
springs. Relief wells should be extended deep enough into the founda-
tion so that the effects of minor geological details on performance are
minimized. It is necessary to note the importance of continuous obser-
vation and maintenance of relief wells, if they are essential to the overall
system of seepage control.

3.6.3 Limitation of Blankets and Relief Wells

3.6.3.1 Sometimes unfavourable site conditions make it difficult and

expensive to place the blanket properly, to ensure its continuity and
to protect it from erosion. The following considerations would influence
the b!anket layout and costs:

4 Presence of a deep pool in the river requiring placement of blanket

under water or dewatering of a large area after extensive coffer-
damming operations.

b) River diversion layout and schedule requiring construction of

blanket in sections. This makes it difficult to ensure satisfactory
junctionsof various sections of the blanket especially in the zone
of intersection of the blanket with the diversion cut.

*Code of practice for design, construction and maintenance of relief wells.

13
IS : 8414 - 1977

c) Unfavourable topography and geological features, such as abrupt

steps in the hill sides, presence of talus and other pervious
deposits of large extent on the abutment and flanks.
d) Possibility of erosion of the blanket by high velocity flow near
entry and exit zones of the diversion cut or tunnel.

3.6.3.2 When blanket is considered as a measure of seepage control a

complete layout plan should be prepared showing the outlet ( including
inlet and exit cuts ) spillway approach and tail channels. The layout
should be examined with regard to the ratio of shortest length of seepage
path to the head, that is, the maximum overall gradient for the under
seepage. Considerations should be given to addition of cutoff trenches to
impervious bed rock near abutment flanks and junction zones. Supple-
mentary measures, such as cutoff wall of concrete depending upon
feasibility should be provided where efficacy of the blanket is liable to be
compromised. Sheet piles may be used for protection of blanket in
vulnerable areas.
3.6.3.3 Open gravel and talus deposits may cause paths of prcferen-
tial seepage to be formed giving rise to sub-surface ercsicn. In such
strata it may be impossible to prevent continuous and excessive discharge
of silt into atleast some of the filter wells. Furthermore, while the
reservoir is being filled for the first time, large springs discharging silt
laden water may emerge downstream from the row of filter wells.
Prevention of the silt discharge from such springs may require patient
experimentation in the field because the pattern of seepage toward the
springs is and will remain unknown regardless of the number of observa-
tion wells, inasmuch as the well records always leave a wide margin for
interpretation. Difficulties also arise in installations and operation of
reliefwells if alternate layers of coarse and fine material exist.
3.6.3.4 If a filter stretching across the boundary of coarse and fine
layers has everywhere the same composition, it is either too coarse to
prevent the washing out of the fine particles or too fine to permit free
discharge of the water out of the coarse stratum. If such a boundary or
boundaries are encountered in filter wells, the lengths of the pervious
sections of the wall of the wells should be limited to the central portion
of the outcrops of the coarse grained strata. The thickness and elevation
of the strata may change from well to well; therefore, a detailed record
should be kept of the sequence. of the strata that were encountered in
each well while it was being drilled, and the specific procedures for the
installation of each well shall be decided on the job.

3.6.3.5 The discharge from the relief wells may decrease with passage
of time for one of several reasons: the reservoir may be silting up; the
wells may be plugging with silt; or the well screens may be becoming
obstructed by chemical deposits or products of corrosion. If the decrease

14
 IS : 8414- 1977

in the discharge is due to silting of the reservoir, the water levels in the
observation wells at full reservoir go down; in all other circumstances
they go up. Excessive discharge of silt should be prevented by sealing off
any silt layers or lenses during installation of the wells. Minor accumu-
lations of silt should be flushed out periodically. For this reason, and
to permit replacement of deteriorated screens, the heads of the wells should
be readily accessible.

4. SELECTION OF SEEPAGE CONTROL MEASURES

4.1 The selection of seepage control measures is dependent on the
nature of foundation strata, the degree of heterogeneity and uncertainty
in foundation characteristics, the economic value of the water stored,
the risk element as influenced by the height of the dam, reservoir volume
and potential damage to important properties, lines of communication, and
important towns. The choice of the seepage control system would also
depend on the feasibility of testing the field performance by observations in
the initial stages of construction or operation and the scope for taking
corrective action before serious damage occurs. As seepage control is
not amenable to routinization in design, the guidelines given are only
an indication of preferred systems which have generally performed
satisfactorily under similar conditions.
4.2 The most dependable measures of seepage control should be adopted
commensurate with cost. Wherever feasible, a positive cutoff should
therefore be used either in the form of a trench backfilled by compacted
imperviobs soil or double line of diaphragm combined with grouting of
the intervening soil or a multiple line grout curtain. Further, if depth
of the impervious stratum is moderate and can be established with
reasonable certainty, the choice would be a positive cutoff trench.
Problems doj however, arise even in relatively simple geology ( for
example, igneous or metamorphic rocks or sedimentary rocks with thick
beds) due to faults, shear zone dykes and similar discontinuities. These
would require extensive grouting treatment beyond the zone intercepted
by the cutoff.

4.3 When deep and extensive but fairly uniform pervious strata of
permeability ranging between 10e3 to 10-l cm/s are encountered, blankets
combined with relief wells and drainage trenches have often been found
to be adequate. Problems however, arise due to presence of open gravel
pockets, zones of talus slide areas, contacts of formations of different
‘geological age, folds, faults and fractured zones. Such features woulG
call for supplementary measures, such as partial cutoff formed by a grout
,curtain. When permeability of the overburden is of the order of
10-s cm/s or less, the quantity of seepage would be small and blankets of
moderate length (about 5 times the head) would be adequate. However,
such materials can be vulnerable to internal erosion. Close observation
.;*
15
IS : 8414 - 1977

would therefore be required over a prolonged period since erosion

channels are known to have developed 20 years or more after construc-
tion. Such cases call for continuous monitoring and evaluation ofthe
performance of the seepage control system. Supplementarv grouting
treatment may be necessary initially or as a corrective measure.

4.4 When permeability is high, that is, of the order of 10-l cm/s or higher,
recourse to grout curtains and diaphragms is generally necessary.
Grouting can be economical in such cases except where problems arise
due to presence of boulders, blocks and talus with irregular rock profile
which make it difficult to establish the depth of the curtain. Presence of
pockets of material of permeability of the order of 10-s cm/s embedded
in the highly pervious mass would compromise the efficacy of treatment
by grouting and untreated pockets may be vulnerable to internal erosion.
In such cases blankets may have to be combined with grout curtain.
Diaphragms would generally be preferred when such pockets of fine sand
and silt are extensive and the average permeability is 10-s cm/s or lower
provided boulders do not make trenching operation impractical.

4.5 When the irregularities and heterogeneities are extensive, it is

advisable to plan for checking of the performance of the seepage control
system at various stages of filling of the reservoir. At the design stage
consideration may be given to provide features that would help in raising
the reservoir level in stages and control rise of water level until the
performance of the seepage control system is verified and corrective
action is taken, wherever required. This may entail introducticn of
special features in the spillway and outlet structures. Where controlled
filling on the basis of observations is not possible, the under seepage
&sign features shall be positive. All these should be considered to be a
part of the design for seepage control. On projects where the risk of
failure is high due to the large height of the dam and capacity of the
reservoir, and existence of important properties downstream or the
geological conditions are subject to a high degree of uncertainty, the
designer should make the worst assumptions compatible to the geological
conditions it may have also to be assumed that the worst condition would
be developedduring construction. Depending on the degree of uncertainty
and the element of risk a second or sometimes a third line of defence
may have to be used. This aspect has been further elaborated under 4.6.

4.6 Combination of Measures to Provide Multiple Lines of

Defence
4.6.1 An element of uncertainty always exists’in respect of under-
seepage control for earth dams except where geology and topography
exclude the possibility of unfavourable local features, for example where
a positive cutoff is provided up to compact and impervious bedrock and
the cutoff extends sufficiently into the flanks. When a positive cutoff is

16
 IS I: 8414 n? 49”67

non feasible from a cost and construction point of view or due to presence
of ,geological discontinuities a second or third line of defence may be
IS : 8414 - 1977

in respect of cost of chiselling through boulders and obstructions and in

grout curtains in respect of spacing of grout holes, number of grout rows
and grout consumption. The construction schedule for coffer dam,
river diversions and dewatering should also be critically reviewed before
opting for the positive cutoff trench.

5. EVALUATION OF CUTOFF EFFICIENCY

5.1 When there is no hazard of subsurface erosion, cutoff efficiency can be
judged in terms of the reduction in the quantity of seepage. In practice,
however, reduction of excess hydrostatic pressures in the downstream part
of the foundation would be an important consideration. Therefore cutoff
efficiency would best be judged in terms of hydraulic gradients obtaining
in the downstream part of the foundation as well as the head loss across the
curtain, as compared to the total reservoir head. For reliable evaluation
of cutoff efficiency it is necessary to examine the downstream gradient by
installing atleast two lines of piezometers downstream of the cut& and
the upstream gradient would be established by minimum of one line of
piezometer. The upstream piezometer line should be placed as close to
the cutoff as possible while avoiding the risk of blockage by grouting.
Study of the. reservoir level in relation to the upstream piezometer would -
serve to isolate the effect of natural blanket or artificial blankets.
Alongwith a study of seepage gradients across the dam and its foundation
groundwater contours before and after filling of the dam and during
various stages to filling should be examined, Reliable interpretation of
piezometric data and groundwater contours requires considerable study
as the water surface contours reflect the combined effect of seepage
flows across the dam and general seepage phenomena governed by the
topographical and geo-hydrological features of the dam site.

I8
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 OCTOBER 1988

IS : 8414 - 1977 GUIDEENES FOR DESIGN OF

UNDER-SEEPAGE CONTROL MEASURES FOR
EARTH AND ROCKFILL DAMS
( Page 3, clause 0.2, line 5 ) - Add the word ‘significantly’ after the
word ‘quantities’.
( Page 5, clause 2.2 line 4 > - Substitute ‘an upstream blanket of
impervious soil' for ‘a blanket’.
( Page 6, clause 2.8 ) - Add the following matter after the third
sentence:
‘The diameter of ring bund should be large enough, that is, at least
ten times the diameter of the boil, to avoid bIow ups in the adjacent
areas and its height should be sufficient to create enough head to reduce
flow through boils.’
( Page 7, clause 3.1.2, line 3 ) - Substitute ‘and'for ‘end’.
( Page 8, clause 3.1.6, last sentence ) - Substitute the following for
the existing matter:
‘Guidelines regarding this aspect are provided in IS : 8826 - 1978*.’
( Page 8, foot-note ) - Add the following foot-note:

‘*Guidelines for design of large earth and rockfill dams.’

( Page 9, clause 3.2.4, last sentence ) - Delete.

(BDC 52)

Printed at Dee Kay Printers, New Delhi-l 10015, India