Reviewer in The Rizl111
Reviewer in The Rizl111
LEGEND
Dates & Places = Blue ink Names = Green ink Important Terms = Orange ink Highlights = Red ink
I. THE FOUNDING OF LA LIGA FILIPINA
July 3, 1892- after his interview with Gov. Despujol, Rizal together with some patriots had a meeting at the home of
Doroteo Ongjungco, a Chinese-Filipino mestizo, on Ilaya St., Tondo, Manila.
Here, Rizal introduced the Liga Filipina, a civic league of Filipinos. In attendance were:
- Ambrosio Flores (Musa), a retired lieutenant of infantry
- Faustino Villaruel (Ilaw), a pharmacist and mason The Elected Officers:
- Numeriano Adriano (Ipil), a notary public and mason President: Ambrosio Salvador
- Pedro Serrano Laktaw (Panday Pira), a mason and a school teacher Secretary: Deodato Arellano
- Domingo Franco (Felipe Real), a mason and a shopkeeper Treasurer: Bonifacio Arevalo
- Ambrosio Salvador, gobernadorcillo of Quiapo, a mason Fiscal: Agustin dela Rosa
- Bonifacio Arevalo (Harem), a dentist and mason
- Mariano Crisostomo, a landlord - Agustin de la Rosa, bookkeeper and mason
- Luis Villareal, a tailor and mason - Estanislao Legaspi, an artisan and mason
- Teodoro Plata, a court clerk and mason - Andres Bonifacio, a warehouse employee
- Apolinario Mabini (Katabay), a lawyer and mason - Juan Zulueta, a playwright, poet, and government employee
- Jose A. Ramos (Socorro), an engraver, printer and owner of Bazar Gran Bretana
- Deodato Arellano, brother in law of MH Del Pilar and a civilian employee of the army
Aims of the Liga Filipina:
1. To unite the whole archipelago into one compact, vigorous, and homogenous body;
2. Mutual protection in every want and necessity;
3. Defense against all violence and injustice;
4. Encouragement of instruction, agriculture, and commerce; and
5. Study and application of reforms.
Motto: Unus Instar Omnium (One Like All) Governing Body of the La Liga Filipina:
The Supreme Council: the governing body which has control over the whole country. It is composed of the president,
secretary, treasurer and fiscal
Provincial Council: formed in every province. The Provincial Council shall have command of the Popular Chiefs.
Popular Council: formed in every town. The Popular Council only shall have command of the members.
Duties of Liga members:
1. Pay monthly dues of ten centavos.
2. Obey blindly and promptly every order emanating from the Council or the Chief.
3. Inform the Council of whatever they note or hear that has reference to the Liga Filipina.
4. Preserve the most absolute secrecy in regard to the decisions of the Council.
5. Help another member in the case of need or danger
6. Each member shall adopt a new name of his own choice
7. Help recruit new members.
8. Treat everyone with respect.
Rizal’s Arrest and Banishment
July 6, 1892- when Rizal went to Malacañ ang to resume his interviews with the Gov. Despujol, the latter showed him
several printed leaflets allegedly discovered under the pillow of his sister Lucia.
These were entitled “Pobres Frailes” which bore the name of the author P. Jacinto. A satire exposing the fabulous
wealth of the friars contrary to the vows of poverty. Rizal denied knowledge of the leaflets. However, he was still
detained at Fort Santiago. Later, he learned that he would be brought to Bataan, but instead he was banished in
Dapitan, a distant military district in Mindanao.
Reasons for Rizal’s Deportation
Rizal published books and articles abroad which showed disloyalty to Spain which were anti-Catholic and anti-friar.
Found bundles of incriminatory leaflets which satirized the friars
Published and dedicated his novel El Filibusterismo to the three martyred “traitors”
Between July 14 and 15, 1892- under heavy guard, Rizal was brought to the steamer CEBU to be brought to Dapitan.
The Captain of the ship was Capt. Delgras, who upon arrival in Dapitan on July 17 turned him over to Captain
Ricardo Carnicero, the Dapitan Commandant. Rizal would stay there until July 31, 1896, a period of four years.
A bayani or a hero is a person who possesses kabayanihan or heroism, that is related to being courageous or brave.
In Greek mythology or folktale, a hero is originally a demi-god, and is one of the distinguishing characteristics of ancient
Greek religion. A demi-god is the son or daughter of an immortal and a mortal parent, an example is Heracles (equivalent
to Hercules in Roman mythology), who was the son of Zeus (Roman equivalent Jupiter) and the mortal Alcmene. In the
long run, a hero or heroine is a real person or a main fictional character of a literary work that, in the face of danger,
combats adversity through feats of ingenuity, bravery or strength; have shown the will to sacrifice himself, which is
called heroism for the sake of glory and honour.
This meaning originally refers to a warrior’s chivalrous or virtuous act in a more pervasive moral goodness. Tales of
heroism may serve as examples of morality. During the classical period of history, the cults revered the heroes like
Hercules, Perseus, and Achilles who had a significant role in religion in Ancient Greece. This hero-worship was used by
ancient and modern rulers for the so called apotheosis (personality cult). A hero is a person who is admired and
acknowledged for his courage, outstanding achievements, and noble qualities. A National Hero is someone who beyond
that has made significant positive contributions to the growth and development of society, and represents all of us.
It is common for Filipinos to look for someone to idolize –saints, politicians, artists, models, etc., somebody they will
glorify and imitate. Since the time of the declaration of Philippine independence, 109 years ago, many were
acknowledged as Filipino heroes, more so today, that every individual who become so popular or the main character in
any particular event is given the title “hero”.
Dr. Esteban de Ocampo, a known historian, stated in his book about Rizal that a hero means a prominent or central
personage taking an admirable part in any remarkable action or event; a person of distinguished valor or enterprise in
danger, or fortitude in suffering; and a man honored after death by public worship because of exceptional service to
mankind. The true heroes of Philippine history deserve to be called so for they didn’t have any idea that one day they
will be measured up, they just acted upon their principles. The concept of honoring heroes came only to the Philippines
in 1900, when the Philippine Commission (Pardo de Tavera, Legarda, Luzurriaga (Filipino members) and headed by
William Howard Taft) approved Act No. 137 combining the districts of Morong and Manila to be named as “Province of
Rizal,” in honor of the most illustrious Filipino. Actually, this Act was disputed by many but the basis of the Commission
was so strong that it has surpassed the public’s questions.
Since then, heroes were celebrated here and there, citing their names in every politician’s speeches, declaring
holidays, naming streets, constructing monuments, etc. in their honor. Until one day, realizing that so many names were
acknowledged as heroes, need to evaluate the situation was proposed. During Marcos’ presidency, he tasked the
National Heroes Commission to come up with the criteria for national hero. On March 28, 1993, thru the President’s
Executive Order No. 75, the National Heroes Committee was created, commissioned to study, evaluate and recommend
historical figures to be declared as national heroes. The Committee composed of worthy members, with a series of
discussions came up with the new criteria. The criteria consisted of 10 standards:
First is the extent of a person’s sacrifices for the welfare of the country.
Second, the motive and methods employed in the attainment of the ideal (was his ideal purely for the welfare of the
country and without any taint of self-interested motives, most of all the method of attainment should be morally valid).
The third is the moral character of the person concerned (the person should not have any immorality issue that affected
his ideal).
The fourth is the influence of the person concerned on his age and or the succeeding age.
Fifth is that heroes are those who have a concept of nation and thereafter aspire and struggle for the nation’s freedom
(they must have desired the country’s freedom in any situation especially when there’s a threat of invasion in any form).
Sixth is that heroes are those who define and contribute to a system of life of freedom and order for a nation (one who
helps in the orderliness and betterment of the country).
Seventh is, heroes are those who contribute to the quality of life and destiny of a nation.
Eight, a hero is part of the people’s expression (the citizen must have recognized and acknowledged the person as a
hero).
Ninth, a hero thinks of the future, especially the future generations, his concern for the future generations must be seen
in his decisions and ideals).
Lastly, the choice of a hero involves not only the recounting of an episode or events in history, but of the entire process
that made this particular person a hero.
Filipinos’ expectations of public figures are different now than it was more than a hundred years ago, maybe because of
the realization that no one is perfect. This is the reason why today so many were acknowledged as heroes and many
were voted in important governing positions with flaws and questionable characters. Lucky are those who aspire one
day to be called a hero that the criteria were already set to pattern their decisions with. I hope that the criteria for
national heroes will not only be checked against the historical figures but also with the politicians to whom we will
entrust the power to govern our country.
According to the 1993 Technical Committee, the National Hero shall be:
One who have a concept of nation and thereafter aspire and struggle for the nation's freedom.
One who define and contribute to a system or life of freedom and order for a nation. Heroes are those who make
the nation's constitution and laws.
One who has contributed to the quality of life and destiny of a nation.
A hero is part of the people's expression. But the process of a people's internalization of a hero's life and works
takes time, with the youth forming a part of the internalization.
The choice of a hero involves not only the recounting of an episode or events in history, but of the entire process
that made this particular person a hero.