Treatment Approaches in MS:
Criteria for Decision-Making
Presented by:
Robert K. Shin, MD, FANA, FAAN
Professor, Department of Neurology
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
Director, Georgetown Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology Center
Georgetown University Medical Center
Lilyana Amezcua, MD, MS, FAAN
Associate Professor of Neurology
Multiple Sclerosis Fellowship Program Director
Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care and Research Group
University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine
This activity is supported by educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, 1
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and Sanofi Genzyme.
Faculty Disclosures
Robert K. Shin, MD, FANA, FAAN
− Consulting Fee: Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono,
Genentech, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme
− Speakers Bureau: Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD
Serono, Genentech, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, and Sanofi
Genzyme
Lilyana Amezcua, MD, MS, FAAN
− Consulting Fee: EMD Serono and Genentech
− Speakers Bureau: Alexion
− Contracted Research: Biogen and Genentech
2
Learning Objectives
Summarize current and emerging biomarkers in
MS, their association with disease development
and progression, and their role in making
treatment decisions
Apply current evidence about long-term safety and
efficacy outcomes of treatment with high-efficacy
DMTs in patients with relapsing and progressive
forms of MS
3
MS Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs)
First generation injectables
− Interferons (beta interferon-1a, beta interferon-1b, peginterferon-1a)
− Glatiramer acetate
Oral Therapies
− S1P agents (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, ponesimod)
− Fumarates (dimethyl fumarate, diroximel fumarate, monomethyl
fumarate)
− Teriflunomide
− Cladribine
Monoclonal antibodies
− Natalizumab
− Alemtuzumab
− Anti-CD20 agents (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab)
4
Treatment Decisions
Lower efficacy DMTs vs higher efficacy DMTs
Safety vs efficacy
a
5
Biomarkers
Diagnostic
Prognostic
Predictive
a
6
Audience Polling Question
Which is a marker for the
differential diagnosis of MS?
A. Anti-AQP4
B. Optical coherence tomography
C. Oligoclonal bands
D. Unsure
7
Diagnostic Biomarkers
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
− Dissemination in space
− Dissemination in time
− Central vein sign?
Oligoclonal bands
− Dissemination in time
Anti-AQP4 and anti-MOG antibodies
− Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)
− Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disorder (MOGAD)
a
8
Prognostic Biomarkers
MRI
− T2 lesions/T1 gad+ lesions/T1 “black holes”
− Volumetric MRI
Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Serum neurofilament light (sNfL)
a
9
T2 FLAIR Lesions
Courtesy of RS Shin
10
T1 “black hole”
Gadolinium enhancing lesion
Courtesy of RS Shin
11
Predictive Biomarkers?
aa
12
Treatment Decisions
Escalation vs induction
Sequencing
a
13
Ontaneda D et al. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(10):973-980.
Join us for Additional Modules on
Biomarkers, Race, Gender, and Genetics in MS:
Precision Medicine in 2021 and Beyond
Available August 27, 2021 – September 10, 2022
▪ Session 1: Racial and Genetic Implications for MS Treatment Selection
Available September 10, 2021 – September 10, 2022
▪ Session 2 – Bite 1: Treatment Approaches in MS: Criteria for Decision-
Making
▪ Session 2 – Case 1: Management of MS in African Americans/Blacks
▪ Session 2 – Case 2: Young Latina MS Patient and Family Planning
▪ Session 2 – Case 3: CIS: Treating or Not Treating and with What?
14
Thank you for
participating today!
Visit NeuroSeriesLive.com for Additional Live and
Endured CME/CE Neurology Activities.