Scribd
Upload
3K views1 page

Group Activity Scoring Rubric

This rubric assesses student group presentations based on explanation and content, teamwork and cooperation, behavior, neatness of work, and promptness. It uses a 5-point scale to evaluate the oral presentation and written report. The criteria include how well the presenter explained the task, the level of participation and camaraderie among group members, the behavior of the group, the neatness of the written work, and whether the task was completed on time.

Uploaded by

Antonia Guiriba
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views1 page

Group Activity Scoring Rubric

This rubric assesses student group presentations based on explanation and content, teamwork and cooperation, behavior, neatness of work, and promptness. It uses a 5-point scale to evaluate the oral presentation and written report. The criteria include how well the presenter explained the task, the level of participation and camaraderie among group members, the behavior of the group, the neatness of the written work, and whether the task was completed on time.

Uploaded by

Antonia Guiriba
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

RUBRICS IN SCORING GROUP ACTIVITIES/PRESENTATION/REPORTING

This rubric assesses the oral presentation of the learners in their group activity. This holistic rubric focuses on both process (during group activity) and output (presented
report) of the group. This rubric also aims to quantify students’ performance in terms of explanation and content, teamwork and cooperation, behavior while performing
the task, neatness of their work, and promptness,

R E S P O N S E S
CRITERIA TOTAL
5 4 3 2 1
The presenter
The presenter The presenter The presenter, more
explained the task
explained the task explained the task in a often than not, reads The presenter just
although he/she is
EXPLANATION and very well and added nice way and some what’s written in the read everything in the
reading what’s written
CONTENT more explanations information are added output. No additional output. Has a lot of
on the output. little
(35%) regarding the output. in his/her explanation. information was code shits/explains
additional information
Has good Has good added. Has many code the task in Filipino
was added. Has code
communication skills communication skill. shifts
shifting
5 4 3 2 1
The students show The students show
exemplary camaraderie although The students have Most of the students Teamwork is not
TEAMWORK AND
camaraderie in doing some of its members camaraderie although are not participating evident and only the
COOPERATION
the task. All of the are not paying most of the students and only few members leader is doing the
(20%)
members are attention and or are not participating are doing the task task
participating. participating
5 4 3 2 1
The group is working Noises are coming The group is always The group is too noisy
BEHAVIOR The group work
silently though some from the group but warned about their and most of its
(20%) silently and orderly
members misbehaves still manageable behavior members misbehave
5 4 3 2 1
The writing is nice and The writing was bad
The writing was okay The reader cannot
NEATNESS OF THE The writing is good has no erasures. but still
though there are so barely understand
WORK and has no erasures. Although there are understandable. There
many erasures. It is a what is written. The
(15%) It is very neat some erasures. It is are plenty of erasures
little bit neat work is very messy.
neat that makes it messy.
5 4 3 2 1
The task was done The task was done The group finished It took the group a
PROMPTNESS early and in an before the allotted the at allotted time hard time to finish the The group didn’t finish
(10%) effective and efficient time though the although the output task in the allotted the task
way output looks hurried. was done in hurry time

TOTAL

You might also like