Cases Consti1
Cases Consti1
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I
I. Introduction
B. Rules of Interpretation
• Francisco v House of Representatives, G.R. 160261 (Nov. 10, 2003)
o Facial Challenge
• Standing
o KMU Labor Center v Garcia, G.R. 115381 (1994)
o IBP v Zamora GR 141284 (2000)
o Tanada v Tuvera 136 SCRA 27 (1985)
o Ople v Torres 293N SCRA 141 (1998)
o Information Technology Foundation v Comelec, GR 159139
(2004)
o Kilosbayan v Guingona, 232 SCRA 110 (1994)
o Saturnino C. Ocampo, et al. v. Rear Admiral Ernesto C.
Enriquez, et al., G.R. No. 225973, November 8, 2016,
o Most Rev. Pedro D. Arigo, et al. v. Scott H. Swift, et al., G.R.
No. 206510, September 16, 2014,
o
• Earliest Opportunity
o Need to notify Solicitor General
▪ Mirasol vs CA GR 128448 (2001)
o Symbolic Decisions
▪ Salonga v Cruz Pano 134 SCRA 438
A. Territory
• Magallona v Ermita, G.R. 187167 (2011)
• Province of North Cotabato v GRP Peace Panel on Ancestral
Domain, 568 SCRA 402 (2008)
• Reagan v CIR, 30 SCRA 968 (1969)
• People v Gozo 53 SCRA 476
B. Philippine Citizenship
The President
to the Judiciary
• Chavez v JBC, 676 SCRA 579 (2012 and 696 SCRA 496 (2013)
• Jardeleza v Sereno, 733 SCRA 279 (2014) and Resolution, GR
213181, Jan 21, 2015
• Villanueva v JBC, GR 211833, Apr 7, 2015
Judicial Independence
Common Provisions
The COMELEC
The COA
• DBP v COA, 231 SCRA 202
• Bustamante v COA, 216 SCRA 164
• DBP v COA, GR No. 88435 (2002)
Sandiganbayan
• PD 1606
• Nunez v Sandiganbayan, 111 SCRA 433
Ombudsman
• Roxas v Vasquez, GR No 114944
• People v Velez, GR No. 138093
• Ledesma v CA GR No. 161629
• Ombudsman v Madriaga, GR No. 164316
• Caoibes v Ombudsman, GR 132177, Jul 19, 2001
National Commissions
• Carino v CHR, GR 96681
• Canonizado v Aguirre, GR No. 133132 (2000)