Scribd
Upload
49 views1 page

Governance and Development

Governance is crucial for addressing development issues as it encompasses political, technological, and institutional elements that influence a government's ability to promote fair growth. Effective governance requires authority, problem-solving skills, and proper implementation of policies, which are often hindered by political conflicts and administrative delays. In the Philippines, the effectiveness of governance is heavily influenced by the political landscape, necessitating a political environment that supports sustainable development outcomes.

Uploaded by

Andrea Lorraine Arqueza Quitaleg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
49 views1 page

Governance and Development

Governance is crucial for addressing development issues as it encompasses political, technological, and institutional elements that influence a government's ability to promote fair growth. Effective governance requires authority, problem-solving skills, and proper implementation of policies, which are often hindered by political conflicts and administrative delays. In the Philippines, the effectiveness of governance is heavily influenced by the political landscape, necessitating a political environment that supports sustainable development outcomes.

Uploaded by

Andrea Lorraine Arqueza Quitaleg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Why is governance an important tool in addressing development issues?

Governance's role in development can't be studied on its own; instead, it needs to be taken into
account in terms of the society in which the government acts.

In general, there are three types of governance: political, technological, and institutional. The setting of
goals and the use of leadership is unquestionably part of the political component. Technology is shown
by things like limited natural resources, low levels of education, low levels of staff skills, and so on. A
political understanding of-and respect for the limits of what is possible in terms of the policy is an
important part of good governance. Politicians, on the other hand, often don't understand the principles
and logic of economics very well. This makes them always want to expand the scope of political choices
to include economic issues, especially when "technical realities" aren't clear.

I've outlined some of the aspects that I believe can have an impact on the state's capacity to manage this
apparatus in order to promote fair growth.

Authority. It's important not to take for granted the political and institutional conditions that are needed
for authority to be built up, though. Political conflicts often end with measures that are meant to make it
more difficult for people to do their jobs. Society can't work unless there are fair and equal rules that
apply to everyone. Meanwhile, legal limits on authority must be set up to stop people from acting
irrationally.

Problem-solving. Identifying problems and challenges, coming up with solutions, and getting money
through the tax system all require the setting up of the right institutional channels that can handle
competing needs.

There is a skill that can be learned about how to deal with disagreements. It can be hard for growth to
move forward when there are political and social conflicts. At the strategic planning and political levels,
what is needed is the ability to deal with and channel these kinds of disagreements, where is not yet there.
This means that there must be long-term institutional channels and a framework for possible alternatives.

Implementation. When it comes to policymaking, economists and politicians often think that once they
make a decision, it will be properly implemented in the real world. When it comes to real life,
administrative delays in both the public and private sectors may make government initiatives less likely
to succeed. There could be a lack of management skills or a deliberate political blockade by policymakers.
This stage of the policymaking process is a great place to sabotage and delay public policy initiatives and
initiatives. There may be times when ideas don't work out in the private sector. Because of a lack of
effective implementation skills, there is a deadlock, or the government's development goals are harmed
by unanticipated consequences.

Unfortunately, while the Philippine government can be autonomous and capable, Philippine politics is
more vital than 'institution development' or more training. And there will be no positive developmental
outcomes until politics provides the kind of state that can generate, sustain, and safeguard an effective
and autonomous capacity for governing.

You might also like