National Guideline For Laboratory Sample Referral System HLS WEB Version 1
National Guideline For Laboratory Sample Referral System HLS WEB Version 1
aUGUsT 2019
The United Republic of Tanzania
AUGUST 2019
National Guideline For Laboratory Sample Referral System
Published in 2019
©MOHCDGEC,
Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children,
Government City- Mitumba,
Afya Road,
PO Box 743,
Dodoma, Tanzania.
Tel: +255 (0)26 232 3267
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.moh.go.tz
Any part of this National Guideline For Laboratory Sample Referral System can be used provided
that the source, which is the Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and
Children and Management Development for Health are acknowledged.
Contents
contents .............................................................................................................. i
Abbreviations and acronyms .............................................................................. iv
Foreword .......................................................................................................... vi
Acknowledgment ............................................................................................. viii
Definition of Terms ........................................................................................... ix
1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1
1.1. Background .................................................................................. 1
1.2. Justification ................................................................................... 3
1.3. Goal ................................................................................................ 4
1.4. Objectives ...................................................................................... 4
1.5. Users of this Guideline ................................................................... 4
1.6. Type of Samples .............................................................................. 5
Bibliography ................................................................................................... 28
list of Annex
Annex 1: Hiv Viral Load Sample and Results Register .............................. 44
Annex 2: Hvl High Viral Load Register ...................................................... 45
Annex 3: Facility Heid Register ..................................................................... 46
Annex 4: Tb Laboratory Register ................................................................. 47
Annex 5: Hvl Hub Sample and Result Register ..................................... 48
Annex 6: Tb Hub Sample and Result Register .............................................. 49
Annex 7: Heid Hub Sample and Results Register ........................................ 50
Annex 8: Sample Manifest ........................................................................... 51
Annex 9: Samples Rejection Log ................................................................ 52
Annex 10: Spoke and Hub Standard Operating Procedures - Master List .. 53
Annex 11: Indicators Performance for Sample Referral System .................... 54
Annex 12: Srs Monthly Monitoring Form .................................................... 55
Annex 13: Hub Quarterly Assessment and Supervision Checklist ................. 56
Annex 14: Hub Laboratory Information System - Quarter Assement Tool ..... 58
Annex 15: Hiv Viral Load Turn around Time ................................................... 59
Annex 16: Heid Turn around Time (Conventional) ........................................ 60
Annex 17: Xpert Mtb/Rif Testing Turn around Time ................................... 61
Annex 18: Line Probe Asssay Turn around Time ....................................... 62
Annex 19: Heid Poc Turn around Time .......................................................... 63
Annex 20: Heid Poc Implementation Checklist ............................................ 64
On behalf of the MOHCDGEC, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the
Management Development for Health (MDH) for their technical and funding support
towards the development of this integrated TB and HIV samples referral and results
feedback guideline. Tanzania, like many low-income countries, is faced with many
challenges in the deliverance of quality health care to its people. Quality health care
delivery includes many aspects, among which is sample referral to higher laboratory
levels for further testing, either in-country and/or referral abroad. Clearly, without quality
samples submitted for testing, patient /client management is compromised, resulting
to harm or death, and loss or wastage of limited resources and personnel time.
The development of TB and HIV samples referral guideline is yet another endeavour
by the MOHCDGEC to ensure intervention programmes are integrated for efficient
utilization of available resources to improve the quality of care. By integrating TB
samples referral into the existing HIV samples referral system, it will streamline service
delivery, improve diagnosis through referrals, and minimize costs, while achieving the
desired objectives.
This guideline has the following sections: Introduction ,which gives a brief account
of HIV and TB situation in Tanzania and the rationale for developing this Guidelines;
Structure, organization and management of SRS, which gives an overview necessary
for proper management of sample referrals; Operation and Implementation, which
describes sample collection, handling (initial processing and temporary storage),
packaging and transportation in optimum conditions, suitable for the kind of testing
Having this Guideline in place will help to support other future intervention programmes
that require samples to be referred and/or transported safely to a testing point; and
also, guarantees timely delivery of test results for patient management or informed
decision.
Although, these National Guidelines Laboratory SRS were developed to target sample
referrals systems for HIV and TB testing, they are not by any means limited to only
these two programmes.
Other pathological samples from disease programmes such Malaria, NCD, Research
including, clinical trials, epidemic prone diseases and future health intervention
programmes, planning to refer samples for testing across and to higher level testing
laboratories, are encouraged to integrate and use this SRS Guideline. As and when this
document is reviewed, new intervention programmes will be incorporated.
Lastly, the MOHCDGEC welcomes views and comments, which will provide valuable
inputs in the updating and preparation of the subsequent edition of the TB and HIV
samples referral and results feedback guideline in Tanzania.
This Guideline for TB and HIV Laboratory Samples Referral System is a product of
dedicated efforts and contributions of Government, Implementing Partners, Non-
Government Organizations, Institutions, Health related intervention programmes
and individuals. The Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly
and Children (MOHCDGEC) is very grateful for their financial support and technical
assistance towards revising and reviewing this Guideline.
The MOHCDGEC through the Department of Curative Services (DCS), and the
Diagnostic Services Section (DSS) would like to acknowledge all Implementing Partners
and stakeholders who in one way or another have contributed to the development
of this guideline. In particular, the MOHCDGEC would like to thank Management
Development for Health (MDH) for the financial and individual technical experts (TABLE
3) for their active participation and constructive input and comments provided in
developing this guideline.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the task force which include the National
AIDS Control Programme (NACP), National Tuberculosis and Leprosy programme
(NTLP) and the Central Tuberculosis and Reference Laboratory (CTRL) for the technical
support for developing this important document. Furthermore, we appreciate the
technical guidance provided by WHO Tanzania experts and through referencing from
their standard guidelines.
Finally, the MOHCDGEC would like to acknowledge the technical officers and support
staff from the DSS for their teamwork, spirit and commitment.
Biological Substance, An infectious substance, which does not meet the criteria
Category B for inclusion in Category A. When transporting diagnostic
sample Category B for only purpose of diagnosis or
investigation, it must be assigned to UN3373.
HIV Viral Load Is the amount of virus in a patient’s blood sample measured
in copies per millilitre (Copies/ml).
1.1. Background
The prevalence of HIV among adults in Tanzania is 4.7% (Tanzania HIV Impact Survey-
THIS, 2018), whereby current prevalence of TB is 295/100,000 population (National
TB prevalence survey, 2012). The overlap between the pandemic is substantial, an
estimated 36% of TB cases in Tanzania are co-infected with HIV. Additionally, WHO
indicates the incidence of TB, including TB/HIV at 269/100,000 (WHO Global TB
Report, 2018).
Similarly, the Global End TB Strategy, approved by the World Health Organization
assembly in 2014, calls for a 95% reduction in TB deaths, and 90% reduction in new
TB cases by 2035 (The WHO End TB Strategy). Achieving these goals depends on
early and accurate detection of TB, including drug-susceptibility testing (DST). The End
TB Strategy has emphasized the important role of a quality-assured laboratory network
equipped with rapid diagnostics.
During the early stages of implementation in 2016, strategies outlined in the National
Operational Plan for Scaling up Viral load (NOPS-VL, 2015) envisaged on maximizing the
resources/testing capacity at hand i.e., the pre-existing HIV DNA PCR and HVL testing
at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), National Health Laboratory (NHLQATC), Mbeya
Zonal Referral Hospital (MZRH), Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC), Bugando
Medical Center (BMC) as well as MDH Temeke Laboratory. In an effort to address this,
the MOHCDGEC in collaboration with the Center for Diseases Control (CDC) through
NACP developed and set up a national systematic sample referral network, which
allows for efficient laboratory sample transportation to a referral laboratory and results
feedback to the testing facility. This network is based on a hub-and-spoke model, in
which a number of health facilities (10-25) - “spokes” sampled within a catchment
area of about 30 to 40 kilometres send samples to a collection point - “Hub”, where
samples are aggregated before transportation to the testing laboratory. By early 2017,
approximately 7,239 health facilities have been mapped to 17 HIV DNA PCR and HVL
testing laboratories countrywide via 309 collection hubs. (National Laboratory Sample
Referral Atlas, 2017). There are about two to three hubs per district, for 309 hubs
covering the 7,239 health facilities (National Laboratory Sample Referral Atlas, 2017).
These 309 hubs submit samples to 17 HVL testing laboratories across the country.
Although sample referral is operational, a number of challenges have been impairing
the referral network’s accountability and contributes to some samples arriving in poor
quality, delayed TATs and lost results.
In pursuit of meeting the global target to end TB (The WHO End TB Strategy),
MOHCDGEC has coordinated efforts to scale up near point of care (POC) testing for
TB across Tanzania. In addition, the MOHCDGEC through the National Tuberculosis
and Leprosy Programme provides a network of TB laboratory services throughout the
country. TB laboratory network in Tanzania is organized into five main levels according
to the type of services provided. These levels include: 1) the Central Tuberculosis
Reference Laboratory (CTRL), 2) Five Zonal TB culture laboratories, 3) Thirty-one regional
referral hospital laboratories, 4) 169 district hospital laboratories and 5) laboratories in
peripheral health centres and dispensaries (National Tuberculosis Laboratory Strategic
Plan 2013). There are 1200 TB microscopy diagnostic centres at different levels of the
1.2. Justification
Currently, there are two parallel systems for TB and HIV sample referral (NTLSP,
2013 and NOPS-VL, 2015). However, despite being operational across the country,
these systems have no standard national guideline that assures their enforcement
and sustainability. Unavailability of such guidelines has led to the un-harmonized
and ineffective implementation of sample referrals and result feedbacks, resulting to
duplication of efforts and wastage of limited resources.
1.3. Goal
Efficient and integrated sample referral and results feedback network in Tanzania.
1.4. Objectives
The guideline targets a scope of laboratory users, consumers, and stakeholders who
are involved in supporting the referral system. These users include the following:
a. Laboratory personnel and other HCWs at the facilities (spokes), Hub and Testing
Laboratory, to be guided in sample referral processes,
b. Clinicians as key consumers of HIV and TB laboratory tests for collaboration and
creating demand for sample referral system,
c. Couriers involved in sample transportation to be guided in sample handling and
transportation,
d. RHMTs and CHMTs for ensuring proper coordination in planning, budgeting, and
implementation of sample referral and result feedback system,
e. MOHCDGEC (NACP and NTLP) and PO-RALGfor planning and coordination,
and ensuring funding and other support is provided to maintain and sustain an
effective sample referral system,
Referred samples are dried blood spots (DBS), whole blood or plasma for HIV testing
parameters for staging and monitoring antiretroviral therapy (ART) and monitoring
treatment of DR-TB; Sputum for TB diagnosis and serum for monitoring treatment of
DR-TB patients. Any other specified pathological sample that will require referral.
Laboratory sample referral consists of the transportation of a sample from one facility
to another, with laboratory diagnostic capacity for investigative purposes and send the
results back. The organizational structure of the Sample Referral System (SRS) shall
follow the hub and spoke model.
The three key components of the system (spoke, hub and referral testing laboratories)
will be linked with the designated couriers for samples and hardcopy test results
transportation.
For the referral system to function effectively and efficiently, the roles and responsibilities
of each component must be clearly defined as follows:
a) Collection of samples;
b) Initial preparation of samples when essential resources are available;
c) Ensuring proper sample packaging for safe transportation to the hub;
d) Ensuring timely dispatch of the collected samples and the necessary
documentation as scheduled;
e) Creating demand for sample referral system and their clinical utility;
f) Laboratory personnel and/or designated HCW in health facilities (spoke) will be
the main contact for sample referral system;
g) To receive and deliver test results to the clinicians and clients.
Health Facility Management Team (HFMT) of the facility hosting a hub shall provide
immediate oversight on the operations of the hub, and shall report to the council
management committee. The hub focal person and the lab manager at the hubs shall
implement the activities of the hub.
The testing laboratory shall have the following duties and responsibilities:
a) Receiving and evaluating sample from the Hubs as per SOP prior to testing;
b) Managing and testing samples according to the SOPs;
c) Ensuring timely delivery of results using available methods, primarily through the
established courier system or via electronic sample referral and results feedback
system;
d) Providing mentorship and support to hubs when necessary, to strengthen and
improve sample referral system.
Members of CHMT are responsible for sample transportation (DLT, DACC and DTLC)
and provide oversight for the sample collection, packaging, transportation and results
feedback.
DTLC, DACC and DRCH-Co in collaboration with DLT shall coordinate all TB, HIV VL,
HEID sample collection packaging and transportation within the district and manage
laboratory consumables and supplies required for sample transportation. Furthermore,
in collaboration with DLT shall make sure guidelines and SOP are available and used
accordingly.
Members of RHMT are responsible for coordination of the sample referral system
(RTLC, RLT, RACC and RRCH co) activities in the region. This includes reinforcement
implementation of guidelines and SOPs at different levels in the region (spoke, hub and
testing laboratory).
RTLC, RLT, RACC and RRCHco in collaboration with RLT shall oversee the sample
referral system within the region, including monitoring and evaluation. The roles shall
include:
a) Coordinating implementation of regional laboratory sample management through
referral networks;
b) Coordination of regional supply of laboratory commodities in respect to sample
transfer;
c) Advocating for regional budgetary provisions to support regional sample referral
networks;
d) Monitoring performance of the regional laboratory sample referral networks and
ensuring timely delivery of results to clinicians, as well as accurate and timely
reporting of network function data to the MOHCDGEC;
e) Coordination of the regional implementing partner activities in support of the
laboratory sample referral system.
The DCS through the Diagnostic Services Section will be implemented through:
a) Developing policies and guidance for National laboratory sample referral and
results feedback system, in support of priority diseases such as HIV and TB as
part of laboratory service delivery strategy;
b) Guiding the integration of laboratory sample referral within vertical programmes;
c) Advocacy for budgetary provisions and mobilization of resources to support
national sample referral system;
d) Putting in place systems to ensure allocated funds for sample referral are utilised
for the intended purpose;
e) Developing the M&E framework for monitoring the performance of sample referral
system;
f) Maintaining and regularly updating the National Laboratory Sample Referral
Atlas (2017).
During sample collection, it is important to ensure that obtained sample meets the
required quality standards by observing the following: -
a) SOPs for Sample management meeting ISO standards shall be developed and
distributed to users for implementation.
b) All personnel responsible for sample collection, packaging and transportation
shall receive basic training to ensure their competency.
b) The triple Packaging system consists of 3 layers: first layer or primary container,
second layer or secondary container and the third layer or tertiary container.
c) All the required documentations must be incorporated into the triple package.
These include laboratory request forms, sample tracking logs/sample manifest.
The National Sample Referral and Results Feedback System aims to maintain sample
quality and integrity for samples that are being transported to laboratories for testing.
The sample quality and integrity shall be maintained from Spoke, Hub to the Testing
Laboratory. Sample collection sites shall ensure the collected samples are of acceptable
quality before dispatching to hubs. All sample transportation modalities shall maintain
sample integrity throughout the transportation routes and shall comply with governing
biosafety rules and regulations.
To ensure consistency, SOPs shall be developed and applied to all stages of the referral
network from sample collection, processing, storage, packaging and transportation.
For these to be achieved, the following should be implemented:
a) HCWs at the Hubs and Spokes shall be required to have all the necessary SOPs
(ANNEX 10) available and in use in their respective areas;
b) All HCWs shall be required to be familiar with adapted SOPs via on-site/on-job
training and orientation;
k) Competency assessment on the operation of SOPs shall be conducted to all
responsible HCWs and couriers. Only competent HCWs and courier shall be
responsible for sample management and transportation respectively.
Samples transported via sample referral networks potentially pose a risk of infection
to both the sample handlers and the environment. Thus, safety measures should
be applied in sample referral networks. These biosafety measures should include
application of universal safety precautions and waste management. Therefore, every
component of sample referral network shall ensure the following:
a) Staff are trained on bio-safety and bio-security regulations covering Infection
Prevention Control (IPC), risk assessment and mitigation, physical security,
material control and accountability, transport and transportation security, incident
response and information security;
There shall be a coordination between the spokes, hub and the designated courier
and the receiver (testing laboratory), to ensure that samples are transported safely and
arrive on time and in good condition. Logistical support shall be provided by CHMT/
RHMT in collaboration with IPs, to maintain the agreed processes for national sample
referral system, whilst maintaining sample quality, biosafety and biosecurity, and client/
patient confidentiality throughout.
l) Hubs should be reaching out to the spokes using designated courier services or
transportation means provided by district councils or regional IP. Note: Spokes
reaching out to the hubs to bring their samples using health workers must
be avoided.
m) Once testing is complete and results have been recorded at the testing laboratory,
the results shall be returned immediately to the respective health facilities. Means
for results feedback shall include the following:
i. Using a national approved and secured electronic sample referral system,
which allows the Hub to access results remotely and print them out for
couriers to collect as they bring in samples for referral.
ii. If the electronic system is not available or faulty, hardcopies of results
should be dispatched by the testing laboratory using the same designated
courier during sample delivering at the laboratory. The courier shall return
to the Hub, a hard copy of results and eventually to the spoke, via the
same route the sample was referred. As with the samples, there should
NB: Spoke, hub and testing laboratory shall have a well-defined mechanism for
communicating on matters including pending and received results, rejects and
failures.
The laboratory information management system (LIMS) serves to store and achieve
essential laboratory data and information for immediate use and later reference, in
an appropriate medium. The system shall ensure proper data management in data
security, integrity, confidentiality, long term storage and archiving. The system may be
in hard (paper-based) or soft (electronic sample referral system) copy.
The requisition form shall be the key data source that should be used to link the data
between HF, Hub and Testing laboratories.
There shall be HF and Hub HVL sample registers to manage HVL sample collection
and return of results to the HF, placed at the HF and Hub respectively. The HF and
Hub HVL sample register should be completed using the requisition form from the HF
and the results form received from the laboratory. The HF and Hub sample register is
designed to allow for longitudinal follow-up of each sample and result, in particular so
that turnaround time can be monitored.
There shall be a documented mentorship support framework across all hubs in the
sample referral system. This framework should include an integrated tool and the plan
for mentorship visits (Annex 13; 14). The hubs shall receive at least one supportive
visit each quarter. Supportive mentorship visits will be a part of essential components
of continual follow-up of trained personnel and on-the-job performance training of the
staff. Mentorship support shall aim at ensuring that the SOPs for documentation,
laboratory data management and analysis are followed in all hubs. Skill gaps shall
be identified for targeted capacity building of the hub staff. Testing laboratories shall
provide adequate mentorship support to staff at hubs in their catchment areas and
they in turn will be supported by NHLQATC. Such mentorship and updates will enable
testing laboratories to pass on new information and changes in laboratory techniques
on a regular basis to the hubs.
There shall be a task force with members from interested programs in the DCS and
DPS Directorates as well as Implementing partners. The task force shall coordinate the
management of the sample referral system and make recommendations to the existing
national laboratory TWGs. The task force shall carry out the following functions:
a) Provide policy guidance and related support;
b) Review and update the national laboratory sample referral mapping;
c) Coordinate training and scale-up best practices for optimizing the sample referral
system;
d) Enforce optimal utilisation of the sample referral and results feedback systems;
e) Mobilize resources.
The regional health management team, including RLT, RACC and RTLC shall provide
oversight management of the referral networks in their respective regions by ensuring
the following:
a) Advising and making recommendations to the task force on matters related to
laboratory sample referral and results feedback networks;
b) Overseeing the quality, safety standards and bio-security of sample during
handling, packaging and transportation;
c) Conducting supportive supervision at specified sites to ensure that the program
functions properly, in collaboration with the councils’ health management teams
and implementing partners.
d) Working with IPs to define uniform and the most sustainable logistics system for
sample transportation;
e) Developing or revising policies and guidelines to improve the national sample
referral system in the same way to ensure the stability of the system;
f) Providing training to all parties involved in the sample referral system and ensure
their competency;
g) Regularly reviewing the performance of the existing laboratory sample referral
system and making recommendations to the task force;
h) Ensuring the sustainability of the system.
The district health management team including DLTs, DACCs and DTLCs shall
coordinate the referral networks in their respective Councils. They shall advise and
make recommendations to the RHMT and IPs on matters related to laboratory sample
referral and results feedback networks. Their support shall include, but not limited to
the following:
a) Ensure that the sample transportation network operates properly;
b) Ensure that the referral linkages are integrated for all diseases to maximize use
of limited resources;
c) In collaboration with the IPs to oversee the proper utilization of resources and the
implementation of the programme;
d) Regularly review the performance of the existing laboratory sample referral
system;
e) Ensure the sustainability of the system.
The hub management shall be responsible for organizing and coordinating the referral
mechanisms and the network it serves. There shall be effective communication
throughout the network to ensure prompt relay of information to spokes within the
shortest possible turnaround times. Such information includes:
a) Rejected samples and corrective measures to minimize recurrences,
b) Testing service interruptions or delays (breakdowns of service) and resumption,
c) Alteration in the examination schedules for specific tests, changes in examination
methods and referral mechanisms,
d) Providing monthly and quarterly reports on laboratory and referral networks
performance to CHMT for decision making. (ANNEXES 12).
3.7.1. Financing
There should be sustainable plan at all levels of SRS implementation to ensure funding
availability and support. The plan shall be drawn and presented for budgeting annually.
Establishment of SRS shall be done using dedicated resources from Councils’
Comprehensive Health Plans (CCHP), with support from the medical laboratory
related professionals for example laboratory technicians, laboratory technologists,
laboratory advisors and laboratory scientists.
a) Cost Sharing
After sensitization of the importance of the sample referral system, the budget
will be developed, approved and shared with government institutions involved
in the health sector for different activities (HIV, TB, Malaria, Epidemic prone
diseases, research), implementing partners, programmes and private.
b) External Funding
These shall be trained and dedicated Hub (SRS) Focal persons whose roles and
responsibilities include oversight in SRS activity implementation at all levels. They will
ensure activities are implemented against approved plans and budgets. Hub (SRS)
Focal persons supported by CHMT will ensure optimal use of the courier system at
every hub and spoke for sample collection and transportation including feedback and
response to challenges, whenever required. Roles and responsibilities of personnel
involved in SRS should be defined to avoid duplication of efforts. At the hub level, there
shall be a trained hub focal person.
The M&E intends to facilitate performance monitoring against the set targets and
provide a guide on interpretation and dissemination of the information for programs
improvement at all levels. It also aims to ensure consistency of recording and reporting
systems across all the partners and stakeholders involved and guide on evaluation of
the sample referral system.
HSPs should strive to produce data of high quality. In order for the HFs to produce high
quality data, Data Quality Assessments (DQAs) should routinely be conducted at all
levels by using DQA tools that are approved by the MOHCDGEC.
Collection of data on HIV, TB and other interventions shall be done by HSPs at the HF
using standardized tools coordinated by R/CHMT. Reporting shall be done on quarterly
basis, from HF levels to the Council level where it is posted to the DHIS2. From the
DHIS2, different authorities can access data without necessarily contacting the national
level. The national level, through the MoHCDGEC shall compile HF and Council data,
which shall then be reported and disseminated to relevant stakeholders.
M&E tools shall be used to capture information collected throughout the sample referral
systems. Recording of the data for HVL, HEID and TB services shall use the following
tools:
a) HVL request form;
b) TB Laboratory request form;
c) Culture and DTS request form;
d) DBS collection form;
e) High Viral Load register;
f) TB Laboratory register (TB05);
Data from samples collected shall be stored either electronically through the CTC2,
ETL, laboratory information system (LIS), electronic sample referral system, GxAlert
System or at the National laboratory data repository (OpenLDR), or on hard copies
of the tools used for data collecting purposes. The electronic means of data storage
must be secured by passwords, while hard copies must be kept in rooms where
confidentiality will be ensured in accordance with Statistical Act2015.
Reporting of data shall be done on monthly and quarterly basis. HFs reports shall
be submitted to the office of the DMO by the 7thday of the following month. Data are
reported from HFs to the Council, region and finally to the national level.
Data dissemination and use shall follow approved format for presentation at national
and international level. Data shall be reported and disseminated on specified period.
Data shall be used at different levels by stakeholders for the purposes of planning and
decision making for improvement of service delivery.
All documents and records related to sample and results management throughout all
components of referral system, must be maintained and controlled in a retrievable
and legible manner. It is the responsibility of the components of the referral system to
archive old documents related to sample and results management within the referral
network and make sure that they are stored in the old documents file within the facility
and are reviewed when needed. Out-dated laboratory registers and other records of
samples received by all components of referral system shall be kept for at least five
years.
i. The operation of the sample referral system shall be monitored and evaluated to
ensure the planned activities are being implemented effectively and efficiently.
Indicators shall be used to track and assess sample referral system performance
guided by the following questions: Is the sample referral system effective?
• Network effectiveness:
• number of samples received from spokes,
• number of samples sent to the testing laboratory,
• Average number of samples transported in a specified time,
• Number of samples with results in a specified time.
The MOHCDGEC through the programmes in collaboration with partners shall facilitate
the M&E of sample referral system. Monitoring of data should be done in specified
period, and report from HFs sent to CHMT, RHMT and relevant authorities. The
MOHCDGEC through programme shall conduct annual performance evaluation and
update the sample referral system, Tables 1 and 2: Log frame and Indicator matrix
refers.
30
Goal Indicator Source Means of Frequency Assumption
Verification
Objective 1
To increase access Number of samples collected HVL register/CTC CTC2 Database, Quarterly Natural calamities
and utilisation of 2 database/MC CTC3 Macro and availability of
laboratory services cohort register/TB database, resource
in diagnosis and Laboratory register Central Database
management (TB05)/DHIS2-ETL Repository, DHIS2-
of HIV, TB, and ETL, DHIS2
other diseases in
Tanzania. Percentage of samples HVL Sample Electronic Sample Quarterly Natural calamities
transported manifest, HEID Referral System, and availability of
sample manifest, Central Database resource
TB Laboratory Repository, DHIS2-
register (TB05), ETL, DHIS3
DHIS2-ETL
Percentage of results returned HVL register/CTC Electronic Sample Quarterly Natural calamities
within targeted national TAT 2 database/MC Referral System, and availability of
cohort register/ Central Database resource
TB presumptive Repository, DHIS2-
register/DHIS2-ETL ETL, DHIS2
Percentage of referred Hub HVL Sample Electronic Sample Quarterly Natural calamities
samples of which results were manifest, HEID Referral System, and availability of
returned sample manifest, DHIS2-ETL, resource
TB presumptive Laboratory LIS
Objective 2
To harmonise Sample referral guidelines in Workshop reports, Workshop reports Once Natural calamities
standardised place Distribution reports and availability of
procedure for resource
sample referral and
results feedback Number of HFs with Sample Workshop reports, Workshop reports Once Natural calamities
referral SOP in place Supervision reports and availability of
resource
Objective 3
To improve Percentage of hubs with DHIS2-ETL, e-SRS Electronic Sample Quarterly Natural calamities
mechanisms for functional electronic sample Referral System, and availability of
TB and HIV sample referral and result tracking DHIS2-ETL, resource
referral and results system Laboratory LIS
tracking
31
32
Goal Indicator Source Means of Frequency Assumption
Verification
Objective 4
To ensure an Number of health care Training reports Training reports Once Natural calamities
effective biosafety workers trained on biosafety and availability of
and biosecurity and biosecurity measures at resource
measures during the hubs
sample referrals.
Number of non-health care Training reports Training reports Once Natural calamities
workers involved in SRS and availability of
trained in biosafety and resource
biosecurity measures.
Integrated biosafety and Workshop reports Workshop reports Once Natural calamities
biosecurity guideline in place and availability of
resource
Number of HFs with biosafety Supervision report Site Visit reports Once
and biosecurity SOPs.
Objective 5
To establish a cost- Cost- effective sample Assessment report Assessment report Once Natural calamities
effective sample transportation model identified and availability of
referral system and implemented resource
for HIV and TB
samples
Objective 6
To ensure quality of Percentage of TB samples for TB Laboratory DHIS2-ETL, Quarterly Natural calamities
referral samples culture referred to the testing registers, Hub Central Database and availability of
laboratories within required/ Sample and Repository, resource
targeted time Results register Electronic Sample
Referral System
Percentage of HVL samples Hub Sample Electronic Sample Quarterly Natural calamities
referred to the testing manifest, Hub Referral System, and availability of
Percentage of HEID samples Hub sample Electronic Sample Quarterly Natural calamities
referred to the testing manifest, Hub Referral System, and availability of
laboratories within required/ Sample and DHIS2-ETL, resource
targeted time Results register Laboratory LIS
Proportion of samples rejected Rejection log Electronic Sample Quarterly Natural calamities
Referral System, and availability of
resource
33
34
Goal Indicator Source Means of Frequency Assumption
Verification
Objective 7
To improve Recording and reporting Workshop reports Workshop reports Once Natural disaster
integrated sample integrated transport referral and availability of
referral data data collection tool in place resource
management and
utilization
Number of sample requests electronic Sample Monthly Reports Monthly Natural disaster
entered in the sample referral referral system and availability of
system and accepted at resource
testing Laboratory
Objective 8
To utilize TB/HIV Number of other pathological Laboratory Central repository Quarterly Natural calamities
sample referral samples transported using TB/ information system, system and availability of
system for other HIV sample referral system manifest form, resource
pathological laboratory sample
samples log/book
1 Number of Medium Facility & To monitor Number N/A Testing Monthly HVL register/CTC
samples District the number of sample category (TB/ 2 data base/MC
collected at the of samples collected at HEID/HVL) cohort register/
spoke collected at the the spoke TB Laboratory
spoke register (TB 05)
3 Turnaround High Facility, To monitor Average/ N/A Testing Monthly HVL register/CTC
time for results District & time from date Median category (TB/ 2 data base/MC
at the spoke National of sample time taken HEID/HVL) cohort register/
collection to between TB Laboratory
date results sample register
received at the collection to
spoke result receipt
at the spoke
35
36
Level of Reporting Indicator
S/N Indicator Numerator Denominator Disaggregation Frequency Source of data
priority level description
4 Percentage of High Facility, To monitor Total Total number of Testing Monthly HVL register/CTC
results returned District results number of results returned category (TB/ 2 database/MC
within targeted returned test results at the spoke HEID/HVL) cohort register/
national TAT within targeted returned at TB Laboratory
time to the the facility Register and
total number within Spoke Level
of results specified Sample referral
returned turnaround integrated register
time
5 Number of High Hub, · To monitor total number N/A Testing Monthly HVL/HEID/
samples District & total number of sample category (TB/ TB Laboratory
collected from National of sample collected HEID/HVL) Register, Hub
collected
spokes from sample and result
from the
spokes designated register
· To monitor spokes
hub
performance
6 Percentage High Hub, Monitor Total number Total number Testing Monthly Hub HVL Sample
of samples District performance of samples of samples category (TB/ manifest, HEID
referred to of Hub and transported received at the HEID/HVL)/ sample manifest,
the testing sample referral from the Hub from the result system
laboratories mechanism Hub to spokes (Hardcopy/
within required/ the testing electronic
targeted time Laboratory
7 Percentage High Hub, To monitor the Total number Total number Testing Monthly Hub HVL Sample
of referred District performance of results of samples category (TB/ manifest, HEID
samples for of Hub and returned transported HEID/HVL)/ sample manifest,
which results result feedback to the Hub from the Hub result system
were returned mechanism from testing to the testing (Hardcopy/
Laboratory Laboratory electronic
in particular
reporting
period
8 Percentage of Medium Hub, To monitor the Total Total number of Testing Monthly Hub HVL Sample
9 Percentage Medium Hub/ To monitor Total number Total number Facility testing Semi- Hub HVL/TB
of spokes District coverage of of active of spokes category Annually Sample manifest,
submitting sample referral spokes mapped to the (CTC/PMTCT/ HEID sample
samples at the system submitting designated TB) manifest,
hub. samples to Hub
the Hub
10 Percentage of High Hub/ To monitor Total number Total number of Testing Monthly Hub sample
sample rejected District/ the quality of samples sample receipt category (TB/ register/Hub
National of sample rejected at and registered HEID/HVL)/ rejection log
received from the Hub at the Hub Rejections register
the spokes reasons
37
Level of Reporting Indicator
38
S/N Indicator Numerator Denominator Disaggregation Frequency Source of data
priority level description
LABORATORY INDICATORS
11 Number of High Laboratory/ To monitor the Total number N/A Testing Monthly TB and HIV
samples Regional/ performance of samples category (TB/ Laboratory sample
received from National and workload received HEID/HVL) reception register/
the hubs of the at the Laboratory
Laboratory Laboratory information
from Hub systems(TB LIS,
and few DHIS2-ETL)
spokes
submitting
samples
directly
to the
Laboratory
12 Percentage Medium Laboratory To monitor the Number of Total Number Testing Quarterly Laboratory sample
of samples overall sample samples of samples category (TB/ reception register/
received within referral system received received at HEID/HVL) Laboratory
between
required time. within the testing information
sample
collection(hub) required Laboratory. system (TB LIS,
and sample time. DHIS2-ETL)
receipt at
the testing
Laboratory
13 Percentage High Laboratory/ To monitor Number Total number Testing Monthly Laboratory
of samples National the quality of samples of sample category (TB/ sample reception/
rejected of sample rejected receipt and HEID/HVL)/ rejection register/
received from at the registered at Rejections Laboratory
the hub Laboratory the Laboratory reasons information
system;(TB LIS,
DHIS2-ETL)
14 Percentage of High Laboratory/ To monitor the Number Total number Testing Monthly Laboratory sample
samples tested. National performance of samples of sample category (TB/ reception register/
and workload tested at the receipt and HEID/HVL) Laboratory
at the Laboratory registered at information
Laboratory the Laboratory system
15 Percentage High Laboratory/ · To monitor Number of Total Number Testing Monthly Laboratory result
of results National number valid results of samples category (TB/ dispatch register/
dispatched of result dispatched tested at the HEID/HVL) Laboratory
from tested
16 Percentage High Laboratory/ Monitor the Number Total Number Testing Monthly Laboratory result
of results National performance of results of results category (TB/ dispatch register/
dispatched and workload dispatched dispatched HEID/HVL) Laboratory
within required of the within to the Hub/ information
Laboratory TAT Laboratory required spokes from system
time form the Laboratory
the testing
Laboratory
39
40
Level of Reporting Indicator
S/N Indicator Numerator Denominator Disaggregation Frequency Source of data
priority level description
17 Percentage of High District/ Monitor Number of Total number of N/A Semi- sample referral
functional hubs National the Hub functional mapped Hubs. Annually atlas/ supervision
functionality Hubs. report
and coverage
of sample
referral system
18 Percentage of Medium District/ Monitor the Number Total number Testing Semi- sample referral
active spokes National coverage of of active of mapped category Annually atlas/ supervision
sample referral spokes. spokes. (HEID/HVL/TB) report/ Hub
system sample register
19 Percentage Medium District/ To monitor Number of Total number Type of Semi- Supervision
of hubs with National the utilization functional of Functional electronic Annually reports/ electronic
functional of electronic Hub with Hubs. sample referral sample referral
electronic sample referral functional system system
sample referral system at the electronic
and result hub(s) sample
tracking system referral
system
20 Percentage of High National To monitor Number of Total number of Region/Zonal Semi- National
functional hubs coverage of functional mapped Hubs Annually laboratory sample
hubs nationally Hubs in in country referral atlas/
country supervision report
21 Percentage of Medium National To monitor Number Total number Region/Zonal Semi- National
active spokes coverage of active of mapped Annually laboratory sample
of spokes spokes in spokes in referral atlas /
nationally country country supervision report/
22 Percentage Medium National To monitor Number of Total number Region/Zonal Semi- Supervision
of hubs with the utilization functional of Functional Annually reports/ electronic
functional of electronic Hub with Hubs in country sample referral
electronic sample referral functional system
sample system at electronic
referral and the hub(s) sample
result tracking nationally referral
system. system in
country
23 Average TAT High National To monitor Average/ N/A Testing Quarterly District & Regional
the overall Median category (TB/ reports/LIS:
turnaround time taken HEID/HVL) TBLIS, DHIS2-ETL
time for the between
sample referral sample
system. collection
to result
receipt.
41
42
Level of Reporting Indicator
S/N Indicator Numerator Denominator Disaggregation Frequency Source of data
priority level description
GENERAL INDICATORS
25 Percentage of High Spoke / To monitor Number Total number Testing Quarterly ESRS, result
results of other hub percentage of of results of other category tracking form,
pathological results of other of other pathological (other laboratory result
samples pathological pathological samples pathological dispatch book
returned samples samples transported to samples)
through TB/HIV returned to the returned to Hub/testing
sample referral facility through the facility laboratory
system TB/HIV sample through TB/ using TB/HIV
referral system HIV sample sample referral
referral system
43
ANNEX 1: HIV VIRAL LOAD SAMPLE AND RESULTS REGISTER
44
Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children.
46
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
47
ANNEX 5: HVL HUB SAMPLE AND RESULT REGISTER
48
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
49
ANNEX 7: HEID HUB SAMPLE AND RESULTS REGISTER
50
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
SAMPLE MANIFEST
Facility Name
District Region
Facility Contact
Sample Quality
Pateint name (for TB Sputum(tick below)
CTC ID./HEID No. Date of Sample (tick below)
S/N and other pathological
(/for HIV samples ) Collection Whole
samples)
HVL Sputum HEID/DBS Good Satifactory
Blood
Time pick up time After 2 Hrs After 4 Hrs After 6 Hrs After 8 Hrs After 10 On Arrival
Temperature
Region
Name Signature Date
Facility In-charge/Manager/Director
Name Signaure Date
Laboratory in-charge/Manager
HVL TB EID
S/N Tool Correctly filled Correctly Correctly
Available Complete Available Complete Available Complete
filled filled
2 Hub register
4 Rejection log
6 Does the hub record your specimen/clients information in the authorized laboratory register upon receipt? (Check the reception
7 Are the specimens received accompanied by the recommended laboratory request forms?
9 Does the hub cross check request forms complete and accurately filled?
11 Does record results received from HVL/EID/ TB Culture and Line probe testing laboratories?
12 Does the lab have an officer assigned to compile the Hub reports?
13 Does the lab send reports to higher levels according to the recommended reporting period?
14 Are the specimens received accompanied by the recommended lab request forms?
17 Are unique laboratory numbers/barcode label assigned for every specimen received?
18 Does the Hub retain and file duplicate copies of the original results?
19 Does the Hub send reports to higher levels according to the recommended reporting period?
20 Are there copies of recent Hub Monthly data reports sent to relevant authorities?(Verify)
23 Does the hub have a computer where you log in the lab information?
24 Are there functional equipment for Laboratory Information System/electronic sample tracking and results return system (i.e eTL
HVL TB EID
1. TAT1: Whole blood should reach a hub and be processed for plasma separation
within six hours of sample collection.
2. TAT 2: Plasma should be transported from the hub and reach the testing
laboratory within 96 (4 days) hours of sample collection.
3. TAT3: Time taken from sample received at laboratory to result released for pick
up shall be 72 hours (3 days).
4. TAT4: The signed hard copy of the results should reach the hub within 72 hours
(3 days) of testing of the sample
5. TAT5: The signed hard or approved soft copy of the results should reach Spokes/
CTCs from the hub within 48 hours (2 days) of testing of the sample.
Overall TAT: The Turnaround Time (TAT) for reporting of results to the Spoke/CTC is 14
days from the time of sample collection.
Overall TAT: The Turnaround Time (TAT) for reporting of results to the Spoke/RCHs is
14 days from the time of sample collection
1. TAT1: Sputum should reach the hub within 24 hours of sample collection.
2. TAT 2: Sputum should be transported from the hub and reach the testing
laboratory within 48 (2 days) hours of sample collection.
3. TAT3: Time taken from the sample received at laboratory to result released for
pick up shall be 5 days
4. TAT4: The signed hard copy of the results should reach the hub within 48 hours
(2 days) of testing of the sample.
5. TAT5: The signed hard or approved soft copy of the results should reach Spokes/
TB diagnostics from the hub within 24 hours (1 day) of testing of the sample.
Overall TAT: The Turnaround Time (TAT) for reporting of results to the Spoke/TB
diagnostic centre is 10 days from the time of sample collection.
1. TAT1: DBS collection should reach the hub testing Centre within 24 hours of
sample collection.
2. TAT2: Time taken from sample received at the hub testing centre to result
released for pick up shall be 24 hours (1 day)
3. TAT3: The signed hard or approved soft copy of the results should reach the
hub within 24 hours (1 day) of testing of the sample.
o) Overall TAT: The Turnaround Time (TAT) for reporting of results to the spoke/TB
diagnostic centre is 72 hours (3 days) from the time of sample collection
3.4 The operator correctly inserts the cartridge into the instrument.
3.5 The operator correctly enters the User ID and Sample ID into the
device.
3.6 The operator adheres to universal safety precautions for the
handling of human blood (e.g. wears gloves and protective
clothing, washes hands, disposes of lancets in puncture resistant
containers, changes gloves after each specimen).
SECTION C-Inventory and Waste Management
Yes (100%) Partial (%) No COMMENTS
Reagents and Supplies: (NOTE: Observe and discuss with facility staff)
SECTION D-Receiving samples from spoke sites (for hub sites only)
Yes (100%) Partial(%) No COMMENTS
6.1 There is a log book for sample reception from spoke sites.
a. If yes, the log book is properly filled out.
6.2
Samples are received from spokes sites within 24 hours of sample collection (if
kept at room temperature) or within 72 hours of collection (if kept at 4 degrees C).
6.3 Samples are transported in appropriate conditions (e.g. in cool boxif kept at 4
degrees C)
6.4 All samples arrive with HEID request forms appropriately filled out and with
linked sample.
6.5 Samples from spokes sites are tested as soon as they arrive and withing 48 hours.
a. If samples are not tested immediately, how many hours ypically elapse between
the time when samples are delivered to the hub site and when they are tested?
7.1 All HEID test results are conveyed to caregivers on the same day as the sample
tested
7.2 All infants who have a positive initial result have a second POC
sample run for confirmation within 48 hours.
7.3 All infants who have a positive initial POC result are initiated on
ART with 24 hours.
7.4 For all infants who have a positive initial POC test result, but a
negative second POC test result (i.e. discordant result), a DBS
sample is sent to a conventional lab, and contact information is
collected from the patient for follow up.
7.5 In the previous three (3) months, all infants diagnosed as HIVpositive were
successfully linked to ART services (NOTE: If possible, cross check positive cases in
POC HEID/DBS Request Forms/HEID Hub register or logbooks against the facility’s
ART register)
8.1 List the topics covered and the recipients of mentoring, training and information sharing.
8.2 List recommendations or plans for future training, mentoring or information sharing.
66
Name of participants Title Organisation Contact
1. Dr. Alex Magesa ADDS MoHCDGEC [email protected]
2. Mr. Peter Torokaa HLS MoHCDGEC [email protected]
3. Dr. Charles G. Massambu Pathologist Consultant DODOMA REGIONAL [email protected]
REFERRAL HOSPITAL
4. Mr. Dickson M. Majige Principle laboratory technologist DODOMA REGIONAL [email protected]
REFERRAL HOSPITAL
5. Ms. Bahati Mfaki Laboratory program officer NACP [email protected]
6. Ms. Basra Douglas Head of CTRL NTLP [email protected]
7. Mr. Richard O. Buretta Sample Referral coordinator MDH [email protected]
8. Mr. Edgar Luhanga Senior laboratory Advisor KNCV [email protected]
9. Mr. Haji Msuya Senior Laboratory advisor UMB [email protected]
10. Mr. Junior Alphey Shao HIV Viral Load &HEID Coordinator HJFMRI [email protected]
11. Mr.Timothy M. Chonde (RIP) Facilitator Freelance [email protected]
12. Mr. Mura Ngoi National Professional Officer (NPO) – WHO [email protected]
Laboratory
13. Dr. Solomon Mwaigwisya Senior Laboratory Advisor-Blood Safety MDH [email protected]
14. Mr. David M. Ocheng Facilitator Freelance [email protected]
15. Dr Liberate Mleoh Deputy Programme Manager NTLP [email protected]
16. Dr. Johnson Lyimo MDR Coordinator NTLP [email protected]
17. Dr. Zuwena Kondo M&E Coordinator NTLP [email protected]
18. Mr. Amri Kingalu Laboratory Manager NTLP/CTRL [email protected]
19. Mr. Elibariki Akyoo M&E Manager THPS [email protected]
20. Mr. Mussa Maganga Senior Advisor- Laboratory Services BORESHA AFYA SOUTHERN [email protected]
HIGHLAND