Heat Resistance and Flammability of High Performance Fibres: A Review
Heat Resistance and Flammability of High Performance Fibres: A Review
The heat and flame resistance of high performance fibres are reviewed according to the literature data. The
performance is discussed considering the physical and chemical structure of the fibres. Some selected high
performance fibres are then evaluated using the cone calorimeter as a fire model to provide realistic data on the fire
behaviour of the fibres. They are also examined in terms of heat resistance using combined TGA/DSC. The results
are discussed and compared with literature data. Heterocyclic rigid-rod polymers (poly (p-phenylene-2,6-
benzobisoxazole or PBO (Zylon1) and poly(2,6-diimidazo (4,5-b:40 ,50 -e) pyridinylene-1,4 (2,5-dihydroxy) phenylene
or PIPD (M5)) exhibit the best performance (little or contribution to fire, low smoke and good heat resistance) and
offer a good combination between heat and flame resistance and mechanical properties. Copyright # 2002 John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
*Correspondence to: Laboratoire de G!enie et Materiaux Textiles (GEMTEX), UPRES EA2461, Ecole Nationale Sup!erieure des Arts et Industries
Textiles (ENSAIT), B.P. 30329, 59056 Roubaix Cedex 01, France
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168
Table 2. Description and properties of high temperature resistant fibres
Chemical name or designation Generic name Chemical structure Trade name LOI (vol.-%) Continuous Applications
operating
temperature
(8C)
N H
HEAT AND FLAME RESISTANCE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE FIBRES
Table 2. (Continued)
O O
Polyimide PI P84TM 38 260 Fire protective clothing, filtration
* N N O * (Inspec
n
Fibres)
O O
O
Poly(ether-etherketone) PEEK PEEK1 35 250 High temperature materials
* C O O n * (Zyex)
OH OH OH
OH
Phenolic fibre Phenolic or C C Kynol1 30–34 200 Fire protective apparel, fire
S. BOURBIGOT AND X. FLAMBARD
CH2 OH
C C OH H2 H2
novoloid H2 H2 (Nippon blockers, composite reinforcement
fibre CH2 CH2 CH 2OH CH2 H2 C Kynol Inc)
C O C C CH2 OH C C
H2 H2 H2 H2 H2
OH OH OH OH OH
Melamine fibre Melamine Three-dimensional melamine-based network Basofil1 30–32 200 Fire protective clothing, insulative
fibre (BASF) materials, fire blockers
N N
N N N N
N N N C N N N
H2
Polyamide-imide PAI O Kermel1 30–32 200 Fire and heat protective clothing,
N S
* n *
S N
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168
HEAT AND FLAME RESISTANCE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE FIBRES 161
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168
162 S. BOURBIGOT AND X. FLAMBARD
material that melts at 1225–13608C, which is high about 7008C, they are completely carbonized, with a
enough to contain the fires for several hours. carbon yield of about 558–60%. This weight loss occurs
without melting, and only a fraction of the compara-
Ceramic fibres. Ceramic fibres are mostly used as tively small volume of volatiles produced is combusti-
refractory fibres in uses over 10008C and are character- ble.71 The remaining carbon char is amorphous (glassy)
ized by a polycrystalline, rather than amorphous, in structure. The LOI of Kynol1 fibres is reported in the
structure. These fibres have exceptional high tempera- range 30–34 vol.%.72 When exposed to flame Kynol1
ture characteristics. Different compositions result in fibres do not melt but gradually char until completely
modifying end use temperatures from about 10508C or carbonized, without losing their original fibre structure.
higher for the kaolin-based products to 14258C and Finally, water and CO2 evolve as the main products of
above for the zirconium-containing materials. decomposition.
Sulphur-containing fibres
Melamine. Although melamine is considered unreac-
tive, its symmetry and functionality make it suitable for
Because of the chemical structure of poly(phenylene
use as a building block in condensation reactions with
sulphide) (PPS) does not fall into any of the standard
formaldehyde. It results in a cross-linked, non-thermo-
polymer classes, the Federal Trade Commission granted
plastic polymer of melamine units joined by methylene
the fibre the new generic name of Sulfar (see Table 2).64–68
and dimethylene ether linkages. In the polymerization
PPS fibres are marketed by Phillips Petroleum Co.
reaction, methylol derivatives of melamine react with
(USA) under the trademark Ryton169 and by Toyobo
each other to form a three-dimensional structure. The
(Japan) under the trademark Procon1.32 The main
resulting network structure gives melamine fibres the
applications of PPS fibres are heat and chemical
same characteristics of other melamine based products:
resistant filters, papermaking felts, insulators, reinfor-
heat stability, solvent resistance, and flame resistance
cing materials and protective clothing. They exhibit
(see Table 2).70,73 Melamine fibre is marketed by BASF
good flame retardancy (LOI is about 40 vol.%) and its
(Germany) under the trademark Basofil1. Since mela-
operating temperature is up to 2608C.17,18,69
mine fibres are heat and flame resistant, they typically
Miscellaneous fibres target hot gas filtration and safety and protective
apparel markets.74 Because of its variable denier and
There are a number of fibres which are used in non- staple length, low tensile strength and difficulty in
conventional textile applications and cannot be classi- processing, melamine fibres are generally blended with
fied in the sections considered above. stronger fibres such as aramids. It is more often used in
needled products or yarns made from wrapped spinning
Phenolic. Phenolic (or also referenced as novoloid) techniques, though recent advances have led to satisfac-
fibres are cured phenol-aldehyde fibres made by acid- tory ring spun yarns, blended with other fibres, such as
catalysed cross-linking of melt-spun novolac resin to para-aramids, suitable for weaving into firemen’s turn-
form a fully cross-linked, three-dimensional, amorphous out gear.
‘network’ polymer structure similar to that of thermo- TGA of melamine fibres reveals that the main
setting phenolic resins (see chemical structure Table degradation temperature of the fibres occurs at 3708C
2).70,71 Chemically, the fibres contain approximately in air and that the residue is 34 wt.% at 6008C. Their
76% carbon, 18% oxygen, and 6% hydrogen. The only continuous use temperature is 2008C. The LOI lies
commercially available phenolic fibres are the so-called between 30 and 32 vol.%.18 Basofil fibre offers good
Kynol1 fibres marketed by Nippon Kynol Inc (Japan). heat and flame protection in comparison with some
They are used in a wide variety of flame- and chemical- other high performance fibres when measuring thermal
resistant textiles and papers, in composites, gaskets and protective performance (TPP)75 as shown in Fig. 5. The
friction materials, and as precursors for carbon and main evolving gases are carbon oxides, water, nitride
activated-carbon fibres textiles, and composites.72 oxides and a small amount of hydrogen cyanide.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicates that
upon heating above 2508C in the absence of oxygen, Fluorocarbon. Fluorocarbon fibres are based on poly
Kynol1 fibres undergo gradual weight loss until, at (tetrafluorethylene) (PTFE) (see Table 2).76 The carbon-
Figure 5. Basofil versus PBI, Nomex and P84 fibres when tested usingTPP test apparatus according to75 (combined convective and radiative heat flux
equalling 83.6 kW/m2 for 20 s).74
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168
HEAT AND FLAME RESISTANCE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE FIBRES 163
fluorine bonds are extremely strong, and provide the Kynol1), melamine fibres (as Basofil1) and polyamide-
polymer with a very high thermal and flame resistance imide fibres (as Kermel1) were supplied respectively by
(LOI = 95 vol.%).77 PTFE fibres are marketed by Kynol GmbH (Germany), BASF (Germany) and
DuPont (USA) under the trademark Teflon1.76 Rhodia (France). Recycled oxidized polyacrylonitrile
fibres were supplied by Achille Bayard (France). The
Polyimide. Polyimide (PI) fibres are manufactured by yarns used in this study have the following character-
polycondensation of an anhydride with aromatic istics:
diisocyanates in high polar solvents such as dimethyl-
formamide or dimethylacetamide (see Table 2).78–81 The
PBO (Zylon): Nm 2/34 spun yarn (60 tex)
thermal properties of PI fibres are characterized by the
PPTA (Kevlar): Nm 2/28 spun yarn (72 tex)
glass transition temperature of 3158C which enables a
Multifilament (90 tex)
fibre application temperature of 2508C.79,82 Recently,
TECH (Technora): Nm 2/28 spun yarn (72 tex)
NASA has developed a new technology via a melt
PIPD (M5): Multifilament (92 tex)
extrusion process to produce these PI fibres.83 The fibres
Phenolic fibre (Kynol): Nm 2/28 spun yarn (72 tex)
have a glass transition temperature of between 2408C
Melamine fibre (Basofil): Staple (2.2 dtex)
and 2708C. Melt extruding the fibres eliminates the need
PAI (Kermel): Staple (2.2 dtex)
for volatiles such as acid and harsh solvents, making the
Recycled oxidized PAN: Nm 1/14 Spun yarn (72 tex)
whole process more environmentally friendly than
solution spinning. NASA says that the process is also
inexpensive. Nevertheless, PI fibres are only produced Processing
by Inspec Fibres (Austria) under the trademark
P84TM .82 The main applications of these fibres are Fibres were knitted on an automatic rectilinear
protective clothing, high temperature filtration and machine gauge 7. The texture used is a double woven
thermal insulation. rib. The fabrics had the surface weight equalling
PI fibres do not melt but decompose and carbonize at 1.08 0.05 kg/m2.
elevated temperatures.84 TGA reveals that at 3508C, the
weight loss of PI fibres is about 5 wt.%, and at 5008C a Cone calorimetry by oxygen consumption
value is attained after 70 min.Their continuous operat-
ing temperature is reported to be 2808C. PI fibres also Samples were exposed to a Stanton Redcroft cone
exhibits a good LOI of 38 wt.%.17 calorimeter at a heat flux equalling 75 kW/m2. This flux
corresponds to flashover conditions. The samples were
Poly(ketone). Polyketones represent another interesting mounted between two cut steel sheets placed on the
group of polymers which possess useful high tempera- usual holder of the cone calorimeter (Fig. 6). The
ture properties. The ether link is used to promote an surface exposed to the external heat flux was 9 9 cm2.
added flexibility to inherently rigid polymer chains Our method does not correspond to any standard.
without incurring too radical reduction in thermal/ Conventional cone calorimetry data (rate of heat release
thermooxidative stability. Poly(ether-ether-ketone) (RHR), volume of smoke production (VSP) (see the
(PEEK1) was the first polyketone synthesized in computation90), CO and CO2 evolution, and the fire
1979,84–86 and other related materials have also been growth rate index (FIGRA) (see the definition91) were
developed.87–88 Nevertheless, only PEEK1 fibres can be obtained using a software developed in our laboratory.
found in the market under the trademark PEEK The experiments were repeated three times. When
marketed by Zyex1 (UK) (see Table 2).89 The main measured at 75 kW/m2 flux, the RHR and VSP values
applications are aerospace components and conveyor
systems.
PEEK1 fibre has a glass transition temperature of
1438C and a melting point of 3438C. Its continuous
operating temperature is 2508C. It exhibits a LOI of 35
vol.%.17
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168
164 S. BOURBIGOT AND X. FLAMBARD
were reproducible to within 10% and CO, CO2 were (TTI of PPTA spun yarn=30 s; TTI of PPTA multi-
reproducible to within 15%. The results presented in filament=25 s) and the RHR peaks (RHR peak of
the following section are averages. The cone data PPTA spun yarn=255 kW/m2; RHR peak of PPTA
reported in this work are the average of three replicated multifilament=290 kW/m2) are similar, but the curves
experiments. after the RHR peaks are significantly different. The two
plateaux assigned to the glowing of the samples92 do not
Thermal analysis have the same duration (300 s between 100 and 400 s
for PPTA spun yarn and 600 s between 200 and 800 s
Simultaneous TGA/DSC measurements were per- for PPTA multifilament).
formed using a Netzsch STA 449C Jupiter instrument RHR curves of the knitted high performance fabrics
under air flow (50 ml/min) from 208C to 12008C. at 75 kW/m2 show that three categories of fibres can be
Samples (about 5 mg) were placed in Pt crucibles with distinguished (Fig. 8). The p-aramid fibres (PPTA and
a cap on the top (the cap had a hole in the centre). The TECH) have a RHR peak value of about 300 kW/m2
calibration in temperature and in energy was made using and a time to ignition at 25 s, while the Kynol and
standards: biphenyl, KClO4, K2CrO4, BaCO3 and recycled oxidized PAN fibres have a lower RHR peak
benzoic acid. value of about 150 kW/m2 but a very short time to
ignition at 3 s. Finally, PBO fibres exhibit a RHR peak
(flat plateau between 100 and 500 s) of only 40 kW/m2
HEAT AND FLAME RESISTANCE and a very long time to ignition at 100 s. This result
confirms the very high flame resistance of PBO in
comparison with the other fibres. Recycled oxidized
The overview of the heat and fire resistance of the PAN and Kynol have moderately high RHR values with
high performance fibres shows that the flame retardancy short times to ignition.
of the fibre is high according to the LOI test (see Table FIGRA is a good indicator of the contribution to fire
2). The LOI test does not provide any data on the flame growth of a material and FIGRA curves of the fibres
behaviour of the fibre in a real fire scenario but only studied are shown in Fig. 9. The FIGRA of PBO is close
indications on the flammability of the fibre in particular to zero which means that PBO does not contribute to
conditions. Here, we consider that LOI alone is not the propagation of fire. FIGRA curves of p-aramids
sufficient for quantifying and predicting the flame (PPTA and TECH) exhibit only one peak respectively at
behaviour of these fibres in a real fire. Other parameters 40 s (FIGRA=500 W/s) and at 30 s (FIGRA=700 W/s)
must be considered such as the heat release rate, time to and after 100 s, values for the two fibres become close to
ignition and heat of combustion. This part evaluates the zero. PPTA and TECH would contribute, therefore, to
reaction to fire and the heat resistance of selected high
performance fibres: PPTA as reference of the high
performance fibres, TECH for its unique mechanical
properties, PBO and PIPD for their unique flame 300 300
200
their good cost to performance ratio.
200
100
Reaction to fire
100 0
0 25 50 75 100 125
Fibres are evaluated as knitted samples of spun yarn Time (s)
250
2000
200
RHR (kW/m²)
1500
FIGRA (W/s)
50 0
0 25 50 75 100
Time (s)
0
PPTA TECH PBO
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Time (s) Oxidised recycled PAN Kynol
Figure 7. Comparison of knitted fabrics of PPTA in spun yarn and mul- Figure 9. FIGRA curves (external heat flux=75 kW/m2) of selected
tifilament yarn. knitted high performance fibres in spun yarn.
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168
HEAT AND FLAME RESISTANCE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE FIBRES 165
RHR (kW/m²)
200
always higher than for the other fibres. It suggests that PPTA multi
150
incomplete combustion reactions are favoured for
PPTA (Fig. 11). The evolution of carbon dioxide leads 100
to the same conclusions made above with regard to
50
respective RHR curves (Figure 12).
Finally, RHR curves of knitted PPTA and PIPD 0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
fibres in multifilament yarns at external heat flux of
Time (s)
75 kW/m2 are presented in Fig. 13. They show that
PIPD fibres should present a superior behaviour in Figure 13. RHR curves (external heat flux=75 kW/m2) of PIPD (M5)
comparison with PPTA. RHR peak of PIPD is only and PPTA fabrics in multifilament yarn.
50 kW/m2 in comparison with 300 kW/m2 for PPTA
0.008
Heat resistance
VSP (m3/s)
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168
166 S. BOURBIGOT AND X. FLAMBARD
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168
HEAT AND FLAME RESISTANCE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE FIBRES 167
100 This work has presented the heat and flame resistance
of high performance fibres presently available on the
Remaining mass (wt.-%)
80
market. Literature and original data have been reported
60 and the main conclusion is that heteroaromatic poly-
40 meric fibres are the most outstanding halogen-free
fibres. In particular, PBO and PIPD exhibit unique
20
flame retardancy and these two fibres present significant
0 advances in high performance fibre technology because
100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 they offer the right combination of unique heat and
Temperature (°C)
flame resistance with exceptional mechanical properties.
PPTA TECH PBO
It is predicted that future technological development will
Kynol Recycled oxidised PAN Basofil
focus on the emergence and exploitation of heterocyclic
Kermel
polymer fibres. It is also anticipated that the market will
Figure 15. TG curves of selected high performance fibres under nitro- provide these fibres at an acceptable cost to performance
gen (heating rate=108C/min). ratio.
CONCLUSION Acknowledgements
It can be seen that the newer organic fibres offer very This work was partially supported by the European project
FLAMERET (New Surface Modified Flame Retarded Polymeric
significant competition in terms of flame resistance and Systems to Improve Safety in Transportation and Other Areas
of other properties (included mechanical, electrical and registered under the number No. G5RD-CT-1999-00120). The
chemical properties). Future expansion of their use authors thank Professor Sikkema from Magellan International
depends partly on the exploitation of these properties in System for helpful discussion on PIPD (M5) fibre and for supplying
specific end-uses and partly on establishing very cost- M5 fibres. Mr Franck Poutch from CREPIM is grateful acknowledged
for helpful discussion on the cone calorimeter. The authors are
effective processing routes. The promise of significant indebted to Mr Dubusse from CREPIM for his skilful experimental
further improvements in properties and/or the possibi- assistance in cone calorimeter, and to Mrs Sabine Chlebicki from
lity of cost reduction with processing, synthesis and cost GEMTEX for her skilful experimental assistance in TGA/DSC
of monomers continues to excite research in this area. experiments.
REFERENCES
1. Hongu T, Philips GO. In New Fibers. Woodhead: Cambridge, 9. Khanna YP, Pearce EM, Forman BD, Bini DA. Polym. Sci.:
1997. Polym. Chem. Ed. 1981; 19: 2799.
2. Pearce EM, Weil ED, Barinov VY. In Fire and Polymers, ACS 10. In High Performance Fibres, Composite and Engineering
Symposium Series 797, Nelson GL, Wilkie CA (eds). Textile Structure, Hearle JWS (ed.). Woodhead Publishing:
American Chemical Society. Washington, DC, 2001; 37–47. Cambridge, 2001.
3. Conroux JJ. In TUT, Ten Years of Technical Textile in 11. Yang HH. In Aromatic High Strength Fibers, Yang HH (ed.).
Western Europe, Euredia N840, 2nd quarter 2001 Establisse- Wiley-Interscience: New-York, 1989.
ments Emile Braylant s.a.: Brussels. 12. Watt W, Perov BV. In Strong Fibers Amsterdam Handbook
4. Euredia: Technical Textiles Buyer’s Guide in TUT, Establis- of Composites Series, Vol. 1. North-Holland: Amsterdam,
sements Emile Braylant s.a.: Brussels 2000. 1985.
5. Limiting Oxygen Index. Standard Test Method for Measur- 13. Termonia Y, Smith P. Polymer, 1986; 27: 1845.
ing Minimum Oxygen Concentration to Support Candle-Like 14. In Technical Guide for NOMEX1 Brand Fiber, http://
Combustion of Plastics, ASTM D 2863 ASTM: Washington, DC. www.dupont.com/nomex.
6. Babrauskas V. In Development of Cone Calorimeter} 15. Yang HH. In Kevlar Aramid Fiber. Yang HH (ed.). John Wiley
A Bench Scale Rate of Heat Release Based on Oxygen & Sons: Chichester, 1993.
Consumption, NBS-IR 82-2611, US Nat. Bur. Stand., 16. http://www.kermel.com.
Gaithersburg, 1982 17. Smith B. In High Performance Fibers Chart. http://www.
7. Babrauskas V. Fire and Mater. 1984; 8: 81. intexa.com.
8. Babrauskas V, Grayson SJ. In Heat Release in Fires. Elsevier: 18. Smith B. In High Performance Fibers. http://www.intexa.-
London, 1992. com.
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168
168 S. BOURBIGOT AND X. FLAMBARD
19. Jaffe M, Jones RS. In Handbook of Fiber and Technology : 61. http://www.toray-intl.co.jp.
Vol. 3}High Technology Fibers, part A, Lewin M, Preston 62. In Advanced Inorganic Fibers: Processes, Structures,
P. (eds). Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1985, Chapter 9. Properties, Applications, Wallenberger FT (ed.). Kluwer
20. Tanner D, Fitzgerald JA, Phillips BR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Academic Publisher: London, 2000.
Engl. Adv. Mater. 1989; 28: 649. 63. In Man-Made Vitreous Fibers, Eastes W (ed.). TIMA Inc: New
21. http://www.teijin-aramid.com. York, 1993.
22. Kovar RF, Arnold FE. ACS Polym. Prepr. 1975; 16: 683. 64. Lopez LC, Wilkes GL. J. Macromol. Sci-Rev. Macromol.
23. Wolfe JF, Loo BH, Arnold FE. ACS Polym. Prepr., 1978; 19: 1. Chem. Phys. 1989; C29: 83.
24. Wolfe JF, Loo BH, Arnold FE. Macromolecules 1981; 14: 915. 65. Tsuchida E, Yamamoto K, Jikei M, Nishida H. Macromole-
25. Wolfe JF, Sybert PD, Sybert JR. US Patent 4,533,692, 1985. cules 1989; 22: 4138.
26. Wolfe JF, Arnold FE. ACS Polym. Prepr. 1977; 18: 414. 66. Tsuchida E, Yamamoto K, Jikei M, Shouji, Nishida H. J.
27. Wolfe JF, Arnold FE. Macromolecules 1981; 14: 909. Macromol. Sci. Chem. 1991; A28: 1285.
28. Choe EW, Kim SN. Macromolecules 1981; 14: 920. 67. Rule M, Fagerburg DR, Watkins JJ, Lauwrens PB. Makro-
29. Wolfe JF, Sybert PD, Sybert JR. US Patent 4,533,693, 1985. mol. Chem. Rapid; Commun. 1991; 12: 221.
30. Helminiak TE. ACS Org. Coat. Plast. Chem. 1979; 40: 475. 68. Rule M, Fagerburg DR, Watkins JJ, Lauwrens PB, Zimmer-
31. Arnold FE. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1989; 134: 75. mann RL, Cloyd JD. Makromol. Chem. Macromol. Symp.
32. http://www.toyobo.co.jp. 1992; 54/55: 233.
33. Kitagawa T, Murase H, Yabuki K. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: 69. http://www.ryton-pps.com.
Polym. Phys. 1998; 36: 39. 70. In Wood Adhesives : Chemistry and Technology, Pizzi A
34. Kuroki T, Tanaka Y, Hokudoh T, Yabuki K. J. Appl. Polym. (ed.). Marcel Dekker: New York, 1983, Chapters 2, 3.
Sci. 1997; 65: 1031. 71. Economy J, Wohrer LC, Frechette FJ, Lei GY. Appl. Polym
35. Bourbigot S, Flambard X, Duquesne S. Polym. Inter. 2001; Symp, 1973; 21: 81.
50: 157. 72. http://www.kynol.com.
36. Jiang H, Eby RK, Adams WW, Lenher G. MRS Symp. Proc., 73. Williams LL, Updegraff IH, Petropoulos. In Applied Polymer
134: 2001; 341. Science, ACS Symp. Ser. 285, Tess RD, Poehlein GW
37. Flambard X, Bourbigot S, Duquesne S, Poutch F. In Fire and (eds.). American Chemical Society: Washington, DC,
Polymers, ACS Symposium Series 797, Nelson GL, Wilkie 1985, Chapter 45.
CA. (eds). American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 74. http://www.basf.com.
2001; 63–75. 75. Method for Thermal Protective Performance of Materials
38. Bourbigot S, Flambard X, Poutch F. Polym. Deg. Stab. 2001; for Protective Clothing for Hot Surface Contact, ASTM
74: 283. F1060-01.
39. Critchley JP. Angew. Macromol. Chem. Int. Ed. 1982; 109/ 76. http://www.dupont.com/afs.
110: 41. 77. Fenimore CP, Martin FJ. Modern Plastics 1966; 44: 141.
40. Neuse EW. Adv. Polym. Sci. 1982; 47: 1. 78. In Polyimides, Vols 1 & 2, Mittal KL (ed.). Plenum: New-York,
41. Conciotori AB, Buckley A, Stuetz DE. In Handbook of Fiber 1987.
and Technology : Vol. 3–High Technology Fibers, part A, 79. In Polyimides}Thermally Stable Polymers, Beesonov MI,
Lewin M, Preston P (eds). Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, Koton MM, Kudryavtvev VV, Laius LA (eds). Plenum: New-
1985, Chapter 6. York, 1987.
42. Powers EJ, Serad GA. In History and Development of 80. Scola DA, Vontell JH. Chemtech 1989; 13: 112.
Polybenzimidazole. Technical Information by Celanese: 81. Sroog CE. Progr. Polym. Sci. 1994; 16: 561.
Charlotte, NC. 82. http://www.P84.com.
43. http://www.pbigold.com. 83. http://www.rti.org/technology/to-polyimidetech.cfm.
44. American Society of Testing and Materials, 1984. ASTM E 84. Kemmish DI. In Poletheretherketone}Rapra Review Report.
906. Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1990.
45. Sikkema D. Polymer 1998; 39: 5981. 85. Attwood TE, Dawson PC, Freeman JL, Hoy LRJ, Rose JB,
46. Lammers M. PhD Thesis. Swiss Federal Institute of Staniland PA. Polymer 1981; 22: 953.
Technology Zurich, 1998. 86. Blundell DJ, Osborn BN. Polymer 1983; 24: 953.
47. Klop EA, Lammers M. Polymer 1998; 39: 5987 87. White DM. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp. 1981; 19: 1635.
48. Lammers M, Klop EA, Northolt MG, Sikkema D. Polymer 88. Johnson RO, Burlhis HS. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp. 1983;
1998; 39: 5999. 70: 129.
49. Van der Jagt, Beukers A. Polymer 1999; 40: 1035. 89. http://www.zyex.com.
50. Hageman JCL, Van der Horst JW, and De Groot RA. Polymer 90. Babrauskas V, Grayson SJ. In Heat Release in Fires. Elsevier
1999; 40: 1313. Science: London, 1992.
51. Sirichaisit J, Young RJ. Polymer 1999; 40: 3421. 91. CEN/TC127N 1424, Reaction to Fire Tests on Building
52. http://www.m5fiber.com. Products (‘‘SBI’’ test), Draft 26 February 1999 European
53. Bacon R, Moses CT. In High Performance Polymers : Their Union: Brussels, 1999.
Origin and Development, Seymour BE, Krishenbaum CS. 92. Bourbigot S, Flambard X, Poutch F, Duquesne S. Polym.
(eds). Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, 1986. Deg. & Stab. 2001; 74: 481.
54. Donnet JB, Bansal RC. In Carbon Fibers, 2nd edn. Marcel 93. Akalin M, Horrocks AR, Price D. J. Fire Sci. 1988; 6:
Dekker Inc: New York, Chapter 1. 333.
55. Hay JN. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 1968; 6: 2127. 94. Lewin M. In Fire Retardancy of Polymers: The Use of
56. Thorne DJ, Marjoram JR. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1972; 16: 1357. Intumescence, Le Bras M, Camino G, Bourbigot S, Delo
57. http://www.tohotenax.com. bel R (eds). The Royal Chemical Society: Cambridge, 1998,
58. http://www.hitco.com. 3–34.
59. http://www.asahi-kasei.co.jp. 95. Walters RN, Hackett SM. Lyon RE. Fire and Mater. 2000; 24:
60. http://map3.msfc.nasa.gov/mapweb/tr/tr3 88236.html. 245.
Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 155–168