Article1399022545 - Erenso Et Al 3 PDF
Article1399022545 - Erenso Et Al 3 PDF
This study was conducted on Boda Forest in West Showa Zone, Oromia National Regional State,
west Ethiopia with the objective of determining the floristic composition, species diversity and the
vegetation structure of the woody plant communities in Boda natural forest. Systematic sampling
method was used to collect the vegetation data. Accordingly, 60 plots of 20 x 20 m (400 m
2
woody species composition. The abundance data of a species were used for the analysis. R program Version 2.15.2
software (The R Core Team, 2012) was used to perform a hierarchical cluster dendrogram, which depic- ted the
vegetation community of woody species. The five plant community types (clusters) at Boda natural forest (Figure 2)
and the five communities and distri-butions of the sample plots in the communities were identified (Table 1).
The indicator values for each species in each group and tests for statistical significance (P<0.05) were analyzed to
name the vegetation community (Table 2). The values are based only on the species abundance and frequency
comparisons. In order to obtain an effective description of community types and their environmental relations, both
classificatory and ordination techniques were employed.
Galiniera saxifrage-Maesa lanceolata community type
This community was represented by three plots and 53 woody plant species. Rhamnus staddo, Premna
schimpehi, Juniperus procera, Maytenus heterophylla and Hypericum quartineanum were the importance
species in the tree layer of the community. Canthium oligocarpum, Abrus schimperi, Sparmanna ricinocarpa and
Myrsine africana were important species in the shrub layer. The common Lianas in this community include Toddalia
asiatica and Gladiolus dalenii. Salvia nilotica, Pentas lanceola and Peperomia abyssinica were also importance herb
species in this community.
Juniperus procera-Myrsine africana community type
This community was represented by nine plots and 61 plant species. Maytenus addat, Hagenia abyssinica and Rhus
vulgaris were the importance species of the tree layer of the community.
In the shrub layer Hibiscus panduliformis, Myrsine africana and Carissa spinarum were the importance
species.
Carissa spinarum-Helichrysum citrispinum community type
This community was represented by 18 plots and 46 plant species. Acanthus polystachius, Sida schimperiana,
Erenso et al. 387
Table 1. The communities and distributions of the sample plots in the communities.
Community Number of plots Plots in the community I 3 25, 26, 33 II 9 43, 44, 45, 24, 27, 9, 10, 7, 2 III 18 51, 52, 53, 29, 30, 41,
42, 49, 45, 47, 43, 1, 11, 12, 21, 22, 19, 20 IV 6 4, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15 V 24 18, 37, 38, 39, 40, 56, 60, 23, 54, 55, 59, 57, 53, 34, 35,
31, 50, 2, 3, 32, 33, 16, 17
Table 2. Indicator plant species for each community and the test of significance (P*value) observed for each indicator species.
Indicator species Local name
I Communities
II III IV V
P*value
Galiniera saxifraga Mixoo 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.08 0.00 Maesa lanceolata Abayyii 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 Juniperus
procera Gaatiraa 0.21 0.41 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.21 Myrsine africana Qacama 0.16 0.37 0.02 0.14 0.00 0.00 Carissa spinarum Agamsa
0.20 0.20 0.36 0.20 0.20 0.90 Helichrysum citrispinum Mukaa gaguraa 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.02 0.00 0.00 Osyris quadripartita Waatoo
0.03 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 Rhus rus polii Daboobesaa 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 Acacia abyssinica Laafto 0.00 0.04 0.10
0.00 0.60 0.03 Gomphocarpus fluticosus Aanannoo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00
Table 3. Sorensen’s similarity coefficient among the plant communities.
Community I II III IV V I II 0.43 III 0.22 0.35 IV 0.37 0.38 0.31 V 0.23 0.23 0.21 0.24
and Solanum marginatum were the importance species of the shrub layer of the community. The common Lianas in
this community include Lagenaria abyssinica, Senna septemtrionalis and Clematis longicauda.
Osyris quadripartite- Rhus ruspolii community type
This community was represented by six plots and 38 plant species. Mimusops kummel, Clerodendrum mylicoides,
Juniperus procera, Maytenus addat and Maytenus heterophylla were the importance species of the tree layer of the
community. The shrub layer is dominated by Solanum anguivi and Lippia adoensis. The common climbers in this
community include Clematis
longicauda and Dregea abyssinica.
Acacia abyssinica-Gomphocarpus fruticosus community type
This community was represented by 25 plots and 31 plant species. Juniperus procera, Dovyalis
abyssinica, Cupressus lusitanica and Eucalyptus globulus were the importance species of the tree layer
of the community. The shrub layer is dominated by Canthium oligocarpum, Euphorbia schimperiana,
Carissa spinarum, Ocimum lamiifolium and Solanum giganteum.
Community similarity analysis
The Sorensen’s similarity index measures the degree to which the species composition of forest or samples is alike,
whereas dissimilarity coefficient assesses which two forest or samples differ in composition. Based on this, similarity
in species composition slightly varied among communities Table 3.
The highest similarity was observed between com- munities I and II (43%). The least similarity was observed
between community III and V (21%), followed by community I and III. Overall similarity coefficient ranges
388 Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv.
Table 4. Species richness, evenness and Shannon-Wiener diversity index of the plant community types.
Community Species richness Diversity index (H’) H’max Species evenness (J) I 53 1.72 1.9 0.09 II 61 1.79 2.0 0.09 III 46 1.66
1.8 0.08 IV 38 1.58 1.8 0.08 V 31 1.49 1.4 0.08
from 21-43% among all the communities. Thus, species composition dissimilarities account for 57% of the most
similar communities and 79% of those that share least similarity (community III and V)
Species diversity
The five communities have almost the same species distribution (equitability or evenness) but comparatively
community V has the least species evenness Table 4.
Vegetation structure
Frequency
We recorded a total of 682 woody plants per ha- from all quadrats. The most frequent of the tree species in this
forest found was J. procera (93.44%), occurring in almost all of the quadrats sampled, followed by Maytenus
heterophylla (49.18%) and Maytenus addat (44.26%), while species like Ficus vast, Euphorbia ampliphylla,
Podocarpus falcatus, Erithrina brueci and Maesa lanceolata were poorly represented.
Basal area
The total basal area of all tree species in Boda Forest was calculated from DBH data. It was found to be 114.64 m
trees in Boda Forest are J. procera, Maytenus heterophylla, Ficus vast, Mayteus addat, Eucalyptus
globulus, Rhamnus staddo, Ekebergia capensis and Premna schimpehi on the basis of their IVI values
relative to other species Table 5, but Bersama abyssinica, Acacia abyssinica, Cordia africana, Rhus rus
polii and Olea europaea are species among the lowest relative IVI values.
DISCUSSION
Floristic composition
In this study, a total of 95 woody species, including shrubs, trees, shrubs/trees, epiphyte, liana and tree/- liana), were
recorded. Overall diversity and evenness were 1.79 and 0.09, respectively. According to Kent and Coker (1992), the
Shannon-Weiner diversity index normally varies between 1.5 and 3.5 and rarely exceeds 4.5. In our study area,
however, there is high diversity and evenness showing more or less even representation of individuals of most woody
species in the sampled quadrats.
Vegetation structure
Vegetation classification is a powerful tool employed for several purposes, including: efficient communication, 2
/ha. J. procera has the highest basal area (25.5%) followed by Podocarpus falcatus (24.64%). On the other hand
the lowest (below 0.56 m
2
/ha) was recorded for most species like Rhamnus prinoides, Rhamnus staddo,
Dovyalis abyssinica, Maesa lanceolata. Thus, the species with the largest basal area could be considered the most
important species in the forest.
With regard to basal area, the most important species of the study forest includes Juniperus procera,
Podocarpus falcatus, Ekebergia capensis, Olea europaea, Ficus vasta, Cupressus lusitanica and
Eucalyptus globulus.
data reduction and synthesis, interpretation, and land management and planning. It also provides one way of
summarizing our knowledge of vegetation patterns (Dalle et al., 2005). The study identified five plant community
types (clusters) at Boda natural forest. Plant communities are conceived as types of vegetation recognized by their
floristic composition. The species compositions of com- munities better express their relationships to one another
and environment than any other characteristic.
Community types I and II, which is dominated by G. saxifrage, M. lanceolata J. procera and M. africana, is found in
specialized habitats such as along river courses. The stands sampled in this type are located at the middle of the
forest, which is less grazed by cattle and its human Importance value index (IVI)
impact is found to be low. Regenerating species of M. addat, H. abyssinica and R. vulgaris are common here. The
most leading dominant and ecologically significant
Community types III, is rich in shrub layer species and
Erenso et al. 389
Table 5. The high importance value index (IVI) of tree species in Boda Forest.
Botanical name RDO RD RF IVI IVI% Juniperus procera 10.96 41.76 15.7 68.42 22.81 Maytenus heterophylla 1.22 9.16 8.26
18.64 6.21 Ficus vasta 16.37 0.18 0.83 17.38 5.79 Mayteus addat 0.96 7.33 7.44 15.72 5.24 Eucalyptus globulus 11.78 2.81 1.1
15.69 5.23 Ekebergia capensis 7.27 1.95 3.03 12.25 4.08 Rhamnus staddo 1.22 4.33 6.61 12.17 4.05 Cordia africana 7.95 0.85
2.75 11.56 3.85 Cupressus lusitanica 8.66 2.08 0.83 11.56 3.85 Premna schimpehi 1.22 3 7.16 11.37 3.79 Olea europaea 2.54
1.95 4.96 9.45 3.15 Acacia abyssinica 2.95 2.81 3.03 8.79 2.93 Bersama abyssinica 1.82 2.75 1.38 5.94 1.98 Rhus ruspolii 1.22
1.1 2.2 4.52 1.51 Others 23.86 17.94 34.72 76.54 25.53 Total 100 100 100 300 100
RDO, Relative dominance; RD, relative density; RF, relative frequency; IVI, Importance values index.
woody climbers. The stands sampled in this community are located in an area having shallow soils with medium
human interference. In few of its stands introduced exotic species of C. lusitanica have been observed.
Community types V, is highly influenced by people collecting firewood, charcoal making and grazing animals.
During the survey of this study, in this community, illegal cutting by local people and introduced exotic species of C.
lusitanica and E. globules have been observed Plate 1. This is due to its being nearby to Boda town and having
species of plants suitable for charcoal making and firewood.
Low species evenness can be attributed to excessive environmental disturbances, variable conditions for
regeneration and selective exploitation of some species (Wassie and Teketay, 2006). Kidane (2003) also explained
that the highest species numbers are found at low disturbance intensities while there is a drastic decrease at high
disturbance intensity. The result of the present study agrees with this regarding species evenness. The five
communities have almost the same species distribution (equitability or evenness) but comparatively community V
has the least species evenness.
The patterns of plant species diversity have often been noted for prioritizing conservation activities because they
reflect the underlying ecological processes that are important for management (Lovett et al., 2000; Senbeta et al.,
2007). Based on similarity index measures, similarity in species composition slightly varied among communities.
The highest similarity was observed between communities I and II (43%) due to the communities having close
altitudinal similarity and
adaptation. The least similarity was observed between community III and V (21%), followed by community I and
III. This may be due to conservational variation and variation in disturbance due to anthropogenic activities. that is,
one area which is better protected varies from the one which is highly exposed to deforestation resulting in
communities’ variation. As it was reported by Denu (2007), in addition to altitudinal gradient, other environmental
factors such as aspect, slope, and soil physical and chemical properties have sound effects on patterns of vegetation
in communities. The present study agreed that high dissimilarity between species to communities may arise from the
altitudinal differences, degree of human impact (anthropogenic) action, over grazing and climatic conditions. For all
communities, the Sorensen’s similarity coefficient values were below 0.5, indicating the existence of low similarities
among the recognized communities which implies that all the communities are important in terms of floristic
diversity and needs attention from a conservation point of view.
According to Lamprecht (1989), species with the same importance value index (IVI) have the same or at least
similar population structure. The result indicates that high IVI was attributed to few species. These species are those
which are well adapted to the high pressure of disturbance, natural and environmental factors, and the effect of local
communities. In contrast to this idea, almost all species in this study showed variation in terms of their IVI, showing
different ecological importance of each species in the forest. In our study, basal area analysis across individual
species revealed that very few species had high dominance. J. procera was the leading dominant and other dominant
species in terms of basal
390 Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv.
Plate 1. Some areas of Boda natural forest (Photo by Fikadu, September, 2013G .C).
area were M. heterophylla, F. vast, M. addat, E. globulus, R. staddo, E. capensis and P. schimpehion. This implies
that these eight species are the most ecologically important woody species at Boda forest.
Conclusions
The results of the study indicated that the study forest had relatively high woody species diversity, that is, 95
specimens of plants (shrubs, trees, shrubs/trees, epiphyte, liana and tree/liana) and dominated by small sized tree and
shrub species in secondary stage of development, indicating that the forest was heavily exploited and affected in the
previous periods, but good regeneration is in process at the present time. Therefore, to improve the natural diversity
and structure of the forest, to minimize the influence of the surrounding communities and utilize the forest resources
sustainably for present and future generation, the following points were made as recommendations:
1. Initiate enrichment plantation program of those most leading dominant and ecologically significant trees, because
of the use of selective cutting by local peoples (e.g. P. falcatus, E. capensis and R. staddo). 2. Raising awareness of
local communities on the value of forest resources and ecological consequences of deforestation and device
mechanisms by which human
impacts can be minimized through discussion and consultation with the local communities with emphasis on
returning the benefits of the protected areas to those communities. 3. Use the cut and carry method for feeding
domestic animals than using free grazing method in the forest to enhance the germination capacity of the seeds in
the soil and seedling development of woody species.
Finally, further studies on soil properties, land use management system and detailed ethno-botanical studies are
also required to explore the wealth of indigenous knowledge on the diversity of plants and their implications in
conservation are also recommended
Conflict of Interests
The author(s) have not declared any conflict of interests.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to gratefully acknowledge Dilla University for financial support. Ginchi District, Agriculture and
Rural Development Offices for providing necessary information and to the communities that were helpful during the
field work and were kind enough to share their knowledge and experiences without reservations are highly
acknowledged.
REFERENCES
Abebe A (2007). Floristic Diversity and Regeneration Structure of some
National priority species in Sigmo - Setema forest, Southwest Bakele T (1993). Vegetation and Ecology of Afromontane
forests on the
central plateau of shewa, Ethiopia, Acta phytogeorgr. Suec. p.79. Balcha G (2008). Biological diversity and current ex situ
conservation practices in Ethiopia. Institute of Biodiversity Conservation and Research, Addis Ababa. Bekele T (1994).
Phytosociology and ecology of a humid Afromontane forest on the central plateau of Ethiopia. J. Vegetation Sci. 5:87-98. Bishaw
B (2001). Deforestation and land degradations in the Ethiopian Highlands: strategy for physical recovery. J. North East Afr. Stud.
8:7- 26. Bridson D, Froman L (1992). The Herbarium hand book. Royal Botanical Gardens Kew. Whit stable Litho Printers Ltd.
(Great Britan eds). p. 303. Dalle G, Brigitte LM, Johannes I (2005). Plant community and their speciesdiversity in the semi-arid
rangelands of Borana lowlands, southern Oromia, Ethiop. Comm. Ecol. 6(2):167-176. Denu D (2007). Floristic Compositioand
Ecological Study of Bibita Forest (Gura Farda), Southwest Ethiopia, M.Sc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa.
Ethiopia. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis
Ababa. FAO (1996). Ethiopia: Country Report to the FAO International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources.
Leipzig, Germany. Friis I (1992). Forests and Forest Trees of Northeast Tropical Africa: Their Natural Habitats and Distribution
patterns in Ethiopia, Djibouti and Somalia. Kew Bulletin Additional Series XV, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO),
London. Hundera K, Gadissa T (2008). Vegetation composition and structure of Belete Forest, Jimma Zone, South western
Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Biol. Sci. 7(1):1-15. Kelbessa E, Demmissew S, Woldu Z, Edwards S (1992). Some threatened Endemic
plants of Ethiopia. NAPRECA Monograph, Series 2:35-55. Kelbessa E, Soromessa T (2008). Interfaces of regeneration,
structure, diversity and use of some plant species in Bonga forest: A reservoir for wild coffee gene pool. SINET: Ethiop. J. Sci.
31(2):121-134. Kent M, Coker P (1992). Vegetation Description and Analysis. A
practical approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York. p. 363. Kidane L (2003). Floristic composition and human interaction in
the
Hugumburda Gratkassu forest. Msc.Thesis, Addis Ababa University. Kotwal CP, Kandari SL, Dugar D (2008). Bioindicators in
sustainable management of tropical forests in India. Afri. J. Plant Sci. 2:99-104. Krebs CJ (1999). Ecological Methodology. 2nd
ed. Addison Welsey
Educational Publishers, USA. 620 p. Lamprecht H (1989). Silverculture in the Tropics. Tropical forest ecosystems and their
tree species-possibilities and methods for their long-term utilization. T2 Verlagsgesells chaft GmbH, RoBdort, Germany.