Chief Administrative Officer Vincent Rongione's Legal Complaint Against Upper Darby Township Council
Chief Administrative Officer Vincent Rongione's Legal Complaint Against Upper Darby Township Council
VINCENT A. RONGIONE :
Chief Administrative Officer :
Upper Darby Township : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
100 Garrett Road :
Upper Darby, PA 19082 : OF DELAWARE COUNTY
:
Plaintiff : JUNE TERM, 2022
:
v. : No.
:
BRIAN K. BURKE : JURY DEMANDED
President, Upper Darby Township Council :
100 Garrett Road :
Upper Darby, PA 19082 :
:
:
and :
:
BRIAN ANDRUSZKO :
Upper Darby Township Council :
100 Garrett Road :
Upper Darby, PA 19082 :
:
and :
:
LAURA A. WENTZ :
Upper Darby Township Council :
100 Garrett Road :
Upper Darby, PA 19082 :
:
and :
:
MEAGHAN WAGNER :
Upper Darby Township Council :
100 Garrett Road :
Upper Darby, PA 19082 :
:
:
and :
:
LISA FARAGLIA :
Upper Darby Township Council :
100 Garrett Road :
Upper Darby, PA 19082 :
:
and :
:
MATT SILVA :
Upper Darby Township Council :
100 Garrett Road :
Upper Darby, PA 19082 :
:
and :
:
THE UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP COUNCIL :
100 Garrett Road :
Upper Darby, PA 19082 :
:
:
Defendants. :
COMPLAINT
Violation of PA Sunshine Act, Conspiracy, Breach of Contract
REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
2
NOTICE TO DEFEND
NOTICE AVISO
You have been sued in court. If you wish to Le han demandado a usted en la corte. Si
defend against the claims set forth in the following usted quiere defenderse de estas demandas
pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days expuestas en las paginas siguientes, usted tiene
after this complaint and notice are served, by veinte (20) dias de plazo al partir de la fecha de la
entering a written appearance personally or by demanda y la notificacion. Hace falta ascentar una
attorney and filing in writing with the court your comparencia escrita o en persona o con un abogado
defenses or objections to the claims set forth against y entregar a la corte en forma escrita sus defensas o
you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case sus objeciones a las demandas en contra de su
may proceed without you and a judgment may be persona. Sea avisado que si usted no se defiende, la
entered against you by the court without further corte tomara medidas y puede continuar la
notice for any money claimed in the complaint of for demanda en contra suya sin previo aviso o
any other claim or relief requested by the plaintiff. notificacion. Ademas, la corte puede decider a favor
You may lose money or property or other rights del demandante y requiere que usted cumpla con
important to you. todas las provisiones de esta demanda. Usted puede
perder dinero o sus propiedades u otros derechos
You should take this paper to your lawyer at importantes para usted.
once. If you do not have a lawyer or cannot afford
one, go to or telephone the office set forth below to Lleve esta demanda a un abogado
find out where you can get legal help. immediatamente. Si no tiene abogado o si no tiene el
dinero suficiente de pagar tal servicio. Vaya en
Delaware County Bar Association persona o llame por telefono a la oficina cuya
Lawyer Referral direccion se encuentra escrita abajo para averiguar
And Information Service donde se puede conseguir asistencia legal.
335 West Front Street
Media, Pennsylvania 19063 Asociacion De Licenciados Del Condado de
(610) 566-6625 Delaware
Servicio De Referencia E
Informacion Legal
335 West Front Street
Media, Pennsylvania 19063
(610) 566-6625
3
INTRODUCTION
Upper Darby Township, Pennsylvania, hereby brings the instant Complaint against Defendants
Brian Burke, Brian Andruszko, Laura Wentz, Meaghan Wagner, Lisa Faraglia, Matt Silva, and the
Upper Darby Township Council (“Township Council” or “Council”) by his counsel and states the
PARTIES
At all times relevant to this action, Plaintiff served as Chief Administrative Officer (“CAO”) of
2. Upon information and belief, the Upper Darby Township Council ("Council")
is a governmental entity governed by the Upper Darby Home Rule Charter, Administrative
Code, and all other applicable laws and is located within Delaware County at the following
Pennsylvania. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, Defendant Burke served as President of
Township Council.
Pennsylvania. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, Defendant Andruszko served as a member of
Township Council.
5. Upon information and belief, Defendant Laura Wentz conducts business in
Pennsylvania. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, Defendant Wentz served as Vice President of
Township Council.
Pennsylvania. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, Defendant Wagner served as a member of
Township Council.
Pennsylvania. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, Defendant Faraglia served as a member of
Township Council.
Pennsylvania. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, Defendant Silva served as a member of
Township Council.
9. Upon information and belief, Upper Darby Township Council is an elected body
FACTS
10. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs as though set forth
fully herein.
11. Upper Darby Township (the “Township”) was founded in 1736 as a Home Rule
Charter community. Today, Upper Darby Township is the sixth largest municipality in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
12. On or about January 6, 2020, Vincent A. Rongione, Esquire was appointed as the
Chief Administrative Officer of the Township by Mayor Barbarann Keffer. Mr. Rongione was
5
confirmed by Township Council, pursuant to Article V, §C-501(A) of the Home Rule Charter.
(See Home Rule Charter Article V,§C-501, attached hereto as Exhibit A.)
13. As the Chief Administrative Officer of the Township Mr. Rongione is responsible
for the administration of all essential services within the Township, all Township departments
report to Mr. Rongione, including all personnel in those units of Upper Darby Township which
14. Mr. Rongione’s employment relationship with the Township was created by and is
governed by the Home Rule Charter. (See Oath of Office, attached hereto as Exhibit A2.)
15. The office of Chief Administrative Officer (“CAO”) is vital to the delivery of public
16. Since January 2020, Mr. Rongione performed brilliantly as CAO and helped the
Township manage the administration of public services throughout the Coronavirus pandemic.
17. Additionally, Mr. Rongione maintains the support and confidence of the duly
18. In July of 2021, Upper Darby Township received $20.88 million dollars in federal
American Rescue Plan Act (“ARPA”) funding related to COVID-19 pandemic recovery.
such its spending is restricted and subject to reporting to the federal government.
20. The ARPA funds were deposited into the Upper Darby general fund accounts.
21. In January of 2022, Defendants Burke, Andruszko, Wentz, Wagner, Faraglia and
Silva opposed the Township’s proposed budget for the allocation of the ARPA funds.
6
22. This block of six Council members held up the release of the ARPA funds,
requiring a special meeting in February of 2022 to release a portion of the funds in order for the
24. The block of six viewed this as a public shaming of their opposition to the ARPA
budget.
25. Public pressure and administrative concessions ultimately led to a passing of the
ARPA funds budget and the block of six voted to release a portion of the funds.
26. However, the block of six embarked on a public campaign in the media questioning
Mr. Rongione’s administration and launching their own investigation into the spending of ARPA
Funds.
27. Defendant Wentz, a member of the block of six, went as far as to be quoted by the
28. In response to the named Defendants’ concerns, the Township retained Marcum,
LLP, a forensic accounting firm, to investigate the receipt and disposition of the ARPA funds.
29. On May 19, 2022, Marcum issued its 153-page final report addressing specific
concerns and allegations made by the six named Defendants that Mr. Rongione had mishandled
ARPA funds.
30. Marcum’s findings made it clear that Mr. Rongione had committed no wrongdoing.
“Despite possible concerns expressed by UDT Council members and others, regulations
and other guidance published by the U.S. Treasury did not require amounts remitted to
municipalities pursuant to ARP be maintained in a separate deposit account. The Treasury
guidance did limit the manner in which ARP funds could be used.”
7
(See page 18 of Marcum report, attached hereto as Exhibit B.)
32. Despite Marcum’s complete findings, which absolved Mr. Rongione of any
mismanagement of the ARPA funds, the six named Defendants persisted with their attacks on Mr.
during the June 1, 2022 meeting as Council member Wentz, a veteran county prosecutor, yelled at
Mr. Rongione and openly accused him of violating laws related to the management of confiscated
34. Wentz’s attack on Mr. Rongione was ghastly, ill-tempered and more importantly,
according to the Township Solicitor Kilkenny’s office, stunningly wrong on the law.
35. As explained in more detail below, Defendant President Burke and Defendant
Council members worked together to keep the members of the public and the duly elected Mayor
from participating in any decision to remove Mr. Rongione from the office of CAO.
36. Through the actions of the six named Defendants, Defendant Township Council
violated, among other provisions of the Sunshine Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 712.1 by voting on a motion
at its June 1, 2022 meeting to deem the office of Chief Administrative Officer forfeited by Vincent
Rongione pursuant to Home Rule Charter Article V §501(c)(1) without placing notice of such
motion on the agenda. (See Sunshine Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 712.1, attached hereto as Exhibit C.)
37. The Township Council Meeting violated the Sunshine Act because the stated
purpose on the agenda did not provide the Township Council, the Township administration and
members of the public with a clear understanding of what purpose and the known action item to
be voted on.
8
38. Defendant Township Council placed “Article 5 of the Home Rule Charter-ALL
Sections” on its agenda which does not constitute sufficient notice under the Sunshine Act. (See
39. Defendants’ failure to give the public notice of such a motion or give the public an
opportunity to comment on the motion was a willful and purposeful violation of the Sunshine Act,
especially given that the deemed forfeiture of the Township’s highest management position was
40. Defendant Council all but admitted that its published agenda item would not be
sufficient notice to the public when it directed its solicitor, Mr. Sean Kilkenny, to read Article V
of the Home Rule Charter aloud during the meeting at which time, when questioned by Council
member Michelle Billups, Defendant Council member Andruszko stated: “I needed a refresher for
myself [of Article V of the Home Rule Charter] and I am sure that not everyone in the audience
was aware of what Article V was…” (See Township Council Meeting at 2:52:29, Upper Darby
41. During the June 1, 2022 meeting, Mr. Rongione challenged the agenda as non-
compliant with the Sunshine Act. Furthermore, the Township Solicitor, Mr. Kilkenny, despite
recusing himself from official participation in the matter, cautioned that if there were a specific
action related to Article V, then the agenda may not be in compliance with the Sunshine Act. (See
Township Council Meeting at 2:08:15, Upper Darby Council Meeting - 6/1/2022, link attached
42. However, the Upper Darby Township Council proceeded, ignoring Solicitor
9
43. Following the motion for forfeiture of the CAO’s office, Solicitor Kilkenny again
cautioned Township Council to consult with the retained Township Council Solicitor, Christopher
Boggs, regarding the appropriateness or lack thereof of the motion. (See Township Council
Meeting at 3:50:45, Upper Darby Council Meeting - 6/1/2022, link attached hereto as Exhibit E.)
44. Following brief discussion, Solicitor Kilkenny noted for a third time, that while
Solicitor Kilkenny had recused his office from providing guidance on the matter, he would once
again not recommend taking a vote and would refer Township Council to its retained Council
Solicitor, Christopher Boggs. (See Township Council Meeting at 3:53:10, Upper Darby Council
45. Township Council ignored this third cautioning by Solicitor Kilkenny, moving
46. At least one Council member, Council member Hafiz Tunis, Jr., noted that he
preferred to speak directly with Solicitor Boggs and that Township Council had not spoken with
Solicitor Boggs regarding his advice on this specific matter. (See Township Council Meeting at
3:57:05, Upper Darby Council Meeting - 6/1/2022, link attached hereto as Exhibit E.)
47. Upon information and belief no Council member, including Defendant Council
member Wagner sought advice from Solicitor Boggs on the legality of the agenda and vote to
48. Indeed, many members of the public were constructively kept out of the meeting
due to the insufficient notice provided in the published agenda, which made no mention of a vote
10
49. Council member Andrew Hayman stated that he was eager to vote so that the matter
could proceed to the Courts where he presumed that “the CAO would win.” (See Township Council
Meeting at 3:58:57, Upper Darby Council Meeting - 6/1/2022, link attached hereto as Exhibit E.)
50. In contravention of all competent legal advice provided to the Upper Darby
Township Counsel and an objection from Council member Tunis, Jr., Township Council voted to
forfeit the CAO’s office by a vote pursuant to Article V, §C-501(C)(1), which deals with
51. On June 6, 2022, the Upper Darby Township’s appointed Conflict Solicitor, Robert
W. Scott, P.C., issued an opinion letter stating that the Upper Darby Township Council was in
violation of the Sunshine Act as well as the Home Rule Charter. (See Conflict solicitor opinion
52. Despite the foregoing opinion letter issued by the Township’s Conflict Solicitor,
Defendant Council persisted in its attempts to forfeit the office of the Chief Administrative Officer
53. Article V, §C-501(B)-Dismissal of the Home Rule Charter, clearly states that the
Mayor shall have the authority to discharge the CAO subject to the approval of a majority of
Council members.
54. Mayor Keffer opposes the Township Council’s dismissal of Mr. Rongione and any
55. In an effort to avoid the Home Rule Charter’s clear requirements for dismissal of
the CAO, the Township Council put on a charade to effect the dismissal of the CAO pursuant to
11
Article V §C-501(C)(1)[dealing with forfeiture of the office due to a lack of qualifications to hold
56. Township Council had no legitimate reason to find that Mr. Rongione lacked
qualifications as prescribed by law or the Home Rule Charter to maintain the office of Chief
Administrative Officer.
57. Article V, §C-502-Qualifications, requires only that the CAO have “executive and
responsibility of administering Township programs.” (See Home Rule Charter, Article V§ C-502
58. Mr. Rongione holds a bachelor’s degree from Villanova University as well as a
59. Mr. Rongione has nearly twenty-years of experience working in government and
politics as well as various public service administrations, including two-and-a-half years as the
Chief Administrative Officer of Upper Darby Township, prior to the instant bogus vote.
60. Upon information and belief, during the meeting, an improper and voidable motion
was made to forfeit the office of Chief Administrative Officer held by Mr. Rongione.
61. Five Council members opposed the motion and at least one Council member, Tunis
62. Council member Hayman did not object to the vote with the stated intent of moving
the matter to the Courts for a judicial decision in Mr. Rongione’s favor.
63. The vote passed by a simple majority of six in-favor, five-opposed (6-5).
12
64. In February 2022, this same voting block of six Council members, i.e., the six
named Defendants, opposed the efforts of the Mayor’s administration’s proposed budget for the
65. The same voting block of six held up the release of the ARPA funds, requiring a
special meeting in February to release a portion of the funds in order for the Township to meet its
payroll obligations.
66. If Defendant Township Council had followed the Home Rule Charter’s
requirements for dismissal of the CAO, the motion would not have succeeded.
67. Upon information and belief, the Mayor would not have moved for the dismissal
68. The six named Defendants knew this information and conspired to do an end-
around to remove the Mayor from the dismissal procedure, in violation of the Home Rule Charter.
69. Upon information and belief, prior to the bogus vote, the voting block of six had a
70. Despite the thrice given advise of the Township regular Solicitor during the
Township Council meeting and the written position opinion given by the Township Conflict
Solicitor, the six named Defendants conspired and took affirmative steps to remove Mr. Rongione
from the duly appointed position of Chief Administrative Officer of the Upper Darby Township.
71. On January 31, 2020, Mr. Rongione issued a memorandum to Council plainly
stating the appropriate manner by which Township Council and constituent concerns should be
addressed in accordance with the Home Rule Charter (See Rongione memorandum, attached
13
72. Despite the guidance provided by Mr. Rongione in his January 31, 2020
memorandum, Defendant Wentz, in violation of the Home Rule Charter, and acting on behalf of
Defendant Council directly and repeatedly approached and harassed members of the Upper Darby
Administrative Officer. (See Rongione Work Environment email attached hereto as Exhibit H.)
73. As of June 6, 2022, in violation of the Home Rule Charter, Defendant Council
President Burke contacted Rose Rice, Special Assistant to the Mayor, on multiple occasions
74. On June 5, 2022, Defendant Wentz entered the administrative offices to have Mr.
75. Named Defendants also attempted to direct the police department to prevent Mr.
76. Upon information and belief, no member of any department within the Township
acknowledges the authority of the Township Council to remove the CAO from office.
77. Township Council, through the actions of the six named Defendants, has been
forced to resort to intimidation and harassment of Township employees in attempts to enforce the
78. Defendants’ actions have not only harmed Mr. Rongione, but they have harmed
and will continue to harm Upper Darby Township and its residents.
79. As CAO, Mr. Rongione was in the midst of overseeing a plan to reorganize the
Upper Darby Township Accounting procedures and banking relationships as well as administering
14
80. At the time of Defendants’ unlawful actions, Mr. Rongione was in the midst of
81. Mr. Rongione, Upper Darby Township and its residents will all be irreparably
COUNT I
Plaintiff vs. All Defendants
(Violation of Pennsylvania Sunshine Act)
82. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs as though set forth
fully herein.
Pennsylvania Sunshine Act in connection with the illegal June 1, 2022 Township Council Meeting
a. Defendants held an improper “meeting” under the Sunshine Act because the
gathering of the Board was improper and violated the notice requirements for
b. Defendant Council failed to provide the requisite public notice of its intention
comment on issues before the Council by not providing the requisite public
84. Defendants acted willfully and with wanton disregard for the Pennsylvania
15
85. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants intentional and willful actions, Mr.
Rongione was significantly harmed and continues to be harmed, including attempts to undermine
his authority as Chief Administrative Officer and interference with his duties as Chief
Administrative Officer.
• a declaratory judgment declaring the June 1, 2022 vote to be invalid and improper and
declaring that the vote to forfeit the office of Chief Administrative Officer be nullified;
• injunctive relief preventing Defendants from acting on the results of the vote to forfeit
Silva, jointly and severally for compensatory and punitive damages in an amount in
excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00), plus such attorney’s fees and reasonable
costs and relief as the Court may allow, including criminal penalties and fines if
COUNT II
Plaintiff vs. Defendants Burke, Andruszko, Wentz, Wagner, Faraglia, and Silva
(Civil Conspiracy)
86. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs as though set forth
fully herein.
87. Defendants combined, discussed, and agreed to commit unlawful acts against Mr.
Rongione, including, but not limited to, breaching of the contract between Mr. Rongione and the
88. Defendants took specific acts in furtherance of their common purpose including
purposefully excluding the Mayor from the dismissal process of Mr. Rongione’s employment as
16
Chief Administrative Officer; preventing Council members from conferring with Council’s
solicitor prior to illegally voting on a matter in violation of the Sunshine Act; preventing members
of the public from participating in the public comment by publishing a deceptive agenda; and
acting on the results of the illegal vote to deny Mr. Rongione the opportunity to serve in his rightful
89. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants actions, Mr. Rongione suffered and
continues to suffer emotional distress, mental anguish, embarrassment, harassment and the denial
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally for
compensatory and punitive damages in an amount in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00),
plus attorney’s fees and such reasonable costs and relief as the Court may allow.
COUNT III
Plaintiff vs. Defendants Burke, Andruszko, Wentz, Wagner, Faraglia, and Silva
(Breach of Contract)
90. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs as though set forth
fully herein.
91. The Home Rule Charter constituted a contract that defined the terms in which the
Council would confirm and dismiss the Chief Administrative Officer. (See Home Rule Charter,
92. Mr. Rongione entered into this contract to serve as Chief Administrative Officer
and was confirmed on January 6, 2020 when he accepted his appointment as Chief Administrative
Officer.
93. Defendants breached this contract by failing to adhere to the provisions of the Home
Rule Charter that govern the dismissal of a Chief Administrative Officer, and instead removed Mr.
17
Rongione from his position by making false allegations; claiming a lack of qualifications; and
taking an illegal and invalid vote in violation of the Pennsylvania Sunshine Act.
94. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ breach, Mr. Rongione suffered and
continues to suffer emotional distress, mental anguish, embarrassment, harassment and the denial
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally for
compensatory and punitive damages in an amount in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00),
plus attorney’s fees and such reasonable costs and relief as the Court may allow.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/_Thomas O. Fitzpatrick
Thomas O. Fitzpatrick, Esq.
Date: July 1, 2022 ONE LIBERTY PLACE
1650 MARKET ST., SUITE 3600
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
(215) 587-0006 (office)
(215) 587-0628 (fax)
[email protected]
Counsel for Plaintiff Vincent Rongione
18
VERIFICATION
I, Thomas Fitzpatrick, verify that I am Counsel for Vincent Rongione and I am authorized
to make the statements set forth in the foregoing Civil Action Complaint which are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief; I understand that these statements are made
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Executed on July 1, 2022.
/s/_Thomas O. Fitzpatrick
THOMAS O. FITZPATRICK, ESQUIRE
Exhibit A
Chapter C
CHARTER
C:1
§ C-101 CHARTER § C-102
ARTICLE I
Name and Boundaries
§ C-101. Name.
Upper Darby Township shall continue to be a municipal corporation under the name of
"Upper Darby Township." As used in this Charter, the word "Township" shall mean the
Home Rule Charter Township of Upper Darby in Delaware County, Pennsylvania.
§ C-102. Boundaries.
The boundaries of the Township shall be the actual boundaries of the Township on the
effective date of the Charter and as may be lawfully changed thereafter.
C:3
§ C-201 CHARTER § C-203
ARTICLE II
Powers of the Township
§ C-202. Construction.
The powers and functions of the Township shall be liberally construed in favor of the
Township. Any specific mention of powers in this Charter shall not be construed as
limiting in any way the general powers of the Township as stated in this Article.
C:5
§ C-301 CHARTER § C-306
ARTICLE III
Township Council
§ C-301. Name.
The legislative branch of the government of Upper Darby Township shall consist of an
elective governing body, which shall be known as the "Upper Darby Township Council."
As used in this Charter, the word "Council" shall apply to the legislative body of Upper
Darby.
§ C-303. Composition.
Except as provided in Article XI, Council shall be composed of 11 members. Seven
members shall be elected from districts. Four members shall be elected at-large. District
Council members shall be nominated and elected by the qualified voters of their
respective districts; Council members-at-large shall be nominated and elected by the
qualified voters of the Township-at-large.
C:7
§ C-306 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-308
§ C-306. Prohibitions.
A. No Council member, during his term, shall hold any other compensated position in
the government of Upper Darby Township.
B. Council shall in all matters act as a body, and it is contrary to the spirit of this
Charter for any member of Council to publicly or privately interfere with the
administration of the Township.
C:8
§ C-308 CHARTER § C-311
charged with conduct constituting grounds for forfeiture of his office shall be entitled
to a public hearing on demand, and notice of such hearing shall be published in one or
more newspapers of general circulation in the Township at least one week in advance of
the hearing. Decisions made by the Council under this section shall be subject to review
by the courts.
§ C-311. Procedures.
C:9
§ C-311 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-311
A. Meetings. Council shall meet regularly at least twice in each month at such times
and places as Council may prescribe by rule. Meetings shall be held with such
notice as prescribed in the Pennsylvania Sunshine Act or successor statute.
[Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 2714]
B. Public Meetings.
(1) Public meetings shall be held regularly at least once in each month at such
times and places as Council may prescribe by rule.
(2) Up to the first 1/2 hour of all public meetings shall be devoted to a public
forum where concerned persons may address the Council. Persons who wish
to address the Council at such public forum shall be given the opportunity to
sign their names to a sign-in sheet which Council shall make available
immediately preceding its public meeting. Persons who wish to address the
Council shall be recognized in the order in which they have signed their names
to the sign-in sheet. Council may, by majority vote, extend the time of the
public forum. [Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 2714]
(3) At all public meetings, Council may recess for the purpose of discussing in an
executive session limited to its own membership any matter which may be
discussed at an executive session held in compliance with the provisions of the
Sunshine Act or successor statute. [Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 2714]
C. Special and Emergency Meetings. [Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 2714]
(1) Special meetings shall be held on the call of the Mayor and/or the President of
Council and/or a majority of the members of Council. Whenever practicable,
Council members shall receive notification of special meetings at least 24
hours in advance. Public notice of each special meeting shall be given of the
place, date and time such meeting is to be convened in accordance with the
Sunshine Act, as amended from time to time.
(2) Emergency meetings may be held without public notice on the call of the
Mayor and/or the President of Council and/or a majority of members of
Council for the purpose of dealing with a real or potential emergency
involving a clear and present danger to life or property.
D. Quorum. Council shall conduct no business except in the presence of a quorum,
which shall be constituted by a majority of the members of Council then in office.
[Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 2714]
E. Rules of Procedure. Council shall, by ordinance, adopt rules of procedure for its
members which shall be designed to assure orderly procedure and full and equal
participation in the deliberations of Council by all of its members. [Amended
1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 2714]
F. Official Actions. Official actions by Council shall be taken only at a public meeting
by the adoption of an ordinance, a resolution, or a motion. [Amended 1-20-1988
by Ord. No. 2714]
(1) Voting on ordinances shall be by roll call vote. Voting on resolutions and
motions shall be by roll call vote only at the request of any Council member.
C:10
§ C-311 CHARTER § C-313
The vote of each Council member who actually votes on any official action
must be publicly cast and, in the case of roll call votes, recorded.
(2) Except as provided in Subsection F(1), the approval of a simple majority of
those present and entitled to vote shall be required to adopt ordinances,
resolutions and motions. If a tie vote occurs, the Mayor shall cast a vote to
break such tie.
(3) The affirmative vote of six Council members shall be necessary to approve
ordinances proposing amendments to this Charter and ordinances amending
the Township's Administrative Code adopted pursuant to this Charter.
G. The Mayor shall have the right to be present at and to participate in all meetings of
Council. He shall not have the right to vote except as otherwise herein provided.
The Chief Administrative Officer shall have the right to be present at all meetings
of Council.
H. Journal. Council shall provide for the keeping of a journal of its proceedings, which
shall include, but need not be limited to, written minutes and other records required
to be maintained by the Township pursuant to the Sunshine Act or successor statute.
This journal shall be a public record. [Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 2714]
I. Electronic Recordings. Council shall provide for electronic recordings of all public
meetings. These recordings shall be preserved for a period of at least two years,
open to the public for inspection during reasonable hours, and kept at the office of
the Township.
J. Agendas. The agendas of public meetings shall be made available to the public by
noon of the day preceding the public meeting.
C:11
§ C-313 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-315
§ C-314. Investigations.
The Council may, by majority vote, make investigations into the affairs of the Township
and the conduct of any Township department, office or agency and, for this purpose,
may subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, take testimony, and require the production of
evidence.
4. Editor's Note: The Township Council, on November 19, 2014, by adoption of Ord. No. 3017, adopted the redistricting
plan presented by the Upper Darby Township Redistricting Committee on October 8, 2014.
C:12
§ C-401 CHARTER § C-403
ARTICLE IV
The Mayor
§ C-402. Prohibitions.
The Mayor shall not hold any other compensated position in the government of the
Township of Upper Darby.
C:13
§ C-403 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-405
K. Have the power to appoint and to dissolve from time to time voluntary committees
of citizens to assist and advise him on issues and matters pertaining to his office.
L. Represent the Township in deliberations with other governmental bodies and shall
have the authority to negotiate intergovernmental cooperative agreements, which
shall be subject to the final ratification of Council.
(1) The Mayor may appoint an appropriate delegate to perform the functions listed
within this paragraph.
M. Have all necessary and incidental powers to perform and exercise any of the duties
and functions of his office as set forth in this Charter or lawfully delegated to him.
serving (including the vote of the President of Council then serving as Mayor),
another of its members to serve out the unexpired term of the Mayor, and the
President of Council then serving as Mayor shall resume his office as a member
and as President of Council. If the President of Council does not so inform the
Council within such forty-five day period, the President of Council shall remain as
Mayor until the earlier of the end of the unexpired term of the Mayor, his death,
resignation, removal from office in any manner authorized by this Charter or by
law, or forfeiture of office. Except as provided with respect to the forty-five-day
notice period provided above, if the President or other member of Council becomes
Mayor for longer than the foregoing forty-five-day period, his office as Council
member shall become vacant. [Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 2714]
C:15
§ C-501 CHARTER § C-504
ARTICLE V
Chief Administrative Officer
§ C-502. Qualifications.
The Chief Administrative Officer shall be appointed solely on the basis of executive and
administrative qualifications, with a background so as to prepare the appointee to assume
the responsibility for administering Township operations.
§ C-503. Compensation.
Compensation for the Chief Administrative Officer shall be determined by Council.
C:17
§ C-504 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-504
C:18
§ C-601 CHARTER § C-605
ARTICLE VI
Township Treasurer
§ C-602. Powers and Duties of the Treasurer. [Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No.
27147]
The Treasurer shall disburse Township moneys in accordance with procedures
established by the Council in the Administrative Code. No such order shall be paid
unless there is a sufficient appropriation.
§ C-603. Vacancy.
Vacancies in the office of Treasurer shall be filled by Council for the remainder of the
unexpired term.
C:19
§ C-701 CHARTER § C-702
ARTICLE VII
Ordinances
C:21
§ C-702 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-703
C:22
§ C-703 CHARTER § C-705
least seven Council members shall be required for adoption. It shall become effective
upon adoption or at such later time as it may specify. Every emergency ordinance
shall automatically stand repealed as of the 61st day following the date on which it
was adopted, but this shall not prevent the reenactment of the ordinance in the manner
specified in this section if the emergency still exists. An emergency ordinance may also
be repealed by adoption of a repealing ordinance in the same manner specified in this
section for adoption of emergency ordinances.
C:23
§ C-801 CHARTER § C-803
ARTICLE VIII
Administrative Structure
§ C-803. Personnel.
A. Appointment of Heads of Departments, Offices, and Agencies. The head of each
department, office, and agency shall be appointed by the Mayor with the approval
of six members of Council. Such officer shall serve under the supervision and
control of the Mayor and shall be discharged by the Mayor with the approval of
Council.
B. Appointment of Subordinates. Each department head may appoint, suspend, or
remove subordinate Township employees, provided that such decisions have
received the final approval of the Mayor and that the Mayor has received a written
recommendation from the Chief Administrative Officer.
C. Merit Principle. All appointments and promotions of Township officers and
employees shall be made solely on the basis of merit and fitness, demonstrated by
examination or other evidence of competence, regardless of sex, race, religion, or
national origin.
D. Personnel Director. The Chief Administrative Officer may appoint a personnel
director to prepare and administer personnel rules and procedures.
E. Personnel Rules. Within one year's time, the Mayor shall cause to be prepared a list
of personnel rules, which shall be submitted to the Council for adoption by
ordinance, with or without amendment, as a part of the Administrative Code. The
rules shall provide for:
(1) The classification of all Township positions, based on the duties, authority,
and responsibility of each position, with adequate provision for reclassification
whenever warranted by changed circumstances;
(2) A pay plan for all Township positions;
C:25
§ C-803 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-803
(3) Methods for determining the merit and fitness of candidates for appointment
or promotion;
(4) The policies and procedures regulating reduction in force and removal of
employees;
(5) The hours of work, attendance regulations, and provisions for sick and
vacation leave;
(6) The policies and procedures governing persons holding provisional
appointments;
(7) The policies and procedures governing relationships with employee
organizations;
(8) Policies regarding in-service training programs;
(9) Grievance procedures, including procedures for the hearing of grievances;
(10) Other practices and procedures necessary to the administration of the
Township personnel system, including a mandatory retirement age for
Township personnel.
F. Legal Officer. There shall be a legal officer of the Township, appointed by the
Mayor with the approval of six members of Council, who shall serve as chief legal
advisor to the Council, the Mayor, the Chief Administrative Officer, and all
Township departments, offices, and agencies and shall represent the Township in
all legal proceedings and shall perform any other duties prescribed by this Charter
or by law. Any elected or appointed Township official or employee, department or
agency requesting and receiving legal advice in writing from the legal officer
regarding the official functions of such official, employee, department or agency
shall be bound to follow such advice and, when followed, the recipient shall not in
any way be liable for so doing. Salary, benefits and other compensation for the legal
officer shall be determined by Council. [Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 27148]
C:26
§ C-901 CHARTER § C-905
ARTICLE IX
Financial Procedures
§ C-904. Budget.
A. The budget shall provide a complete financial plan of all Township funds and
activities for the ensuing fiscal year and, except as required by law or by this
Charter, shall be in such form as the Mayor deems desirable or as the Council may
require. In organizing the budget, the Mayor shall utilize the most feasible
combination of expenditure classification by fund, organization unit, program,
purpose or activity and object. It shall begin with a clear general summary of its
contents; shall show in detail all estimated income, indicating the proposed real
property tax levy, and all proposed expenditures, including debt service, for the
ensuing fiscal year and actual income and expenditures of the preceding year. It
shall indicate in separate sections:
(1) Proposed expenditures for current operations during the ensuing fiscal year,
detailed by offices, departments, and agencies in terms of their respective work
programs, and the method of financing such expenditures;
(2) Proposed capital expenditures during the ensuing fiscal year, detailed by
offices, departments, and agencies when practicable, and the proposed method
of financing each such capital expenditures; and
(3) Anticipated net surplus or deficit for the ensuing fiscal year of each utility
owned or operated by the Township and the proposed method of its
disposition; subsidiary budgets for each utility giving detailed income and
expenditure information shall be attached as appendices to the budget.
B. The total of proposed expenditures shall not exceed the total of estimated income.
C:27
§ C-905 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-906
C:28
§ C-906 CHARTER § C-909
If Council fails to take these actions by this date, then the amounts appropriated
for current operation for the current fiscal year shall be deemed adopted for
the ensuing fiscal year on a month-to-month basis, with all items in it prorated
accordingly, until such time as the Council adopts a budget for the ensuing fiscal
year. Appropriations shall be made in lump sum to departments and agencies in
the following categories: personal services; material, supplies and equipment; debt
service. Council may adopt a program budget, in which case appropriations will
be made to programs.
D. Real Property Tax Levy Limitation. Real Property Tax rate increases are limited to
a maximum of three mills or 5% of the prior year's budget per annum unless
approved through the action of public referendum; however, in addition to the
foregoing, an annual tax sufficient to pay interest and principal on any indebtedness
incurred pursuant to the Local Government Unit Debt Act, or any prior or
subsequent act governing the incurrence of indebtedness of the Township, is
permitted. [Amended 1-20-1988 by Ord. No. 27149]
C:29
§ C-909 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-911
for payments beyond the end of the fiscal year, provided that such action is made or
approved by ordinance.
C:31
§ C-1001 CHARTER § C-1004
ARTICLE X
Recall
§ C-1001. General.
Any person holding an elective office of the Township government, whether by election,
succession, or appointment to fill a vacancy, shall be subject to removal from office at a
recall election in the manner provided in this Charter.
C:33
§ C-1004 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-1006
to the recall election, and thereupon the election shall not be held.
B. The following question shall be presented to each elector in a recall election:
"Shall (name of officer) be recalled and removed from the office of (name of
office)?"
C. The above question shall appear as to every officer whose recall is to be voted upon,
and provision shall be made for the elector to vote "Yes" or "No" to the question.
D. If a majority of the registered voters whose vote on the recall election shall vote
"Yes," the incumbent shall be deemed recalled and removed from office; but if a
majority of such registered electors shall vote "No," he shall remain in office.
E. Should the result of such election be affirmative, the date of the removal and
vacancy in the office shall be seven days subsequent to the date when the results of
the election are certified by the County Board of Elections, unless such date is
further postponed by order of the court.
F. District Council members shall be subject to recall only by registered electors of
their respective district.
§ C-1006. Limitations.
No recall petition shall be filed against any incumbent of an elective office within the
first year or the last nine months of the term of his office or within nine months after an
unsuccessful recall election against them, but no officer who has been re-elected for a
successive term shall be subject to recall also during the first year of such term.
C:34
§ C-1101 CHARTER § C-1103
ARTICLE XI
Transition and Schedule
§ C-1101. Adoption.
This Charter shall be submitted to a vote of the electors of Upper Darby Township at the
primary election held in May 1974.
C:35
§ C-1103 UPPER DARBY CODE § C-1105
this position then he must vacate his office (as Commissioner or, under this
Charter, Council member-at-large) and this office shall remain vacant.
E. Majority Decisions during the Transition Period. For the first two years this Charter
is in effect, Council shall be composed of at least 11 and, at the most, 18 members.
All decisions requiring the approval of a majority of Council shall require the
approval of a majority of the actual number of Council members at that time. All
decisions requiring, by this Charter, the approval of six Council members shall, for
this period only, require the approval of a majority of the actual number of Council
members. All decisions requiring the approval of seven members of Council shall,
for this period only, require the approval of a majority of the actual number of
Council members plus an additional Council member.
§ C-1105. Continuity.
A. All rights, claims, actions, orders, contracts, and legal or administrative proceedings
shall continue, except as modified pursuant to the provisions of this Charter.
B. All Township ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations which are in force at
the time this Charter is adopted and which are not inconsistent with the provisions
of this Charter shall continue in force until amended or repealed.
C. All Township departments, bureaus, administrative units, offices, agencies,
authorities, boards and commissions shall continue until modified by the provisions
of this Charter.
C:36
§ C-1201 CHARTER § C-1203
ARTICLE XII
General Provisions
§ C-1201. Amendments.
Amendments to this Charter shall be in conformity with the provisions of Act 62 of
1972, and as amended from time to time.10
§ C-1203. Severability.
If any provision of this Charter shall be judged by any court of competent jurisdiction to
be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof but
shall be confined in its operation to the particular provision involved.
10. Editor's Note: See Home Rule Charter and Optional Plans Law, 53 Pa.C.S.A. § 2901 et seq.
C:37
Exhibit A2
Exhibit B
May 19, 2022
This letter report sets forth the findings of our forensic accounting investigation, pursuant to
Marcum LLP’s engagement letter with you dated February 16, 2022. The purpose of our
investigation was to determine the existence and possible disposition of the “ARP funds” 1 received
by Upper Darby Township (“UDT”).
Marcum LLP is a national accounting and advisory services firm that offers a complete spectrum
of tax, assurance and advisory services. Our Advisory Services practice includes Litigation and
Forensic Services. (Attachment A) Kyle Anne Midkiff, CPA, CFE, CFF, Engagement Partner,
headed up the engagement team and was assisted by Nicole M. Donecker, CPA, CVA, CAMS,
Senior Manager, and others. Our CVs are included in Attachment B.
I. Executive Summary
On July 19, 2021 UDT received $20,880,969.50 pursuant to its April 2021 application to the
U.S. Treasury for funds available to UDT under the ARP Act. Former Finance Director, Gary
Merron 2 (“Merron”) directed the ARP funds be initially deposited to a UDT general fund
operating bank account maintained at Wells Fargo Bank (“WF”). On August 3, 2021, a wire
transfer in the amount of $20,880,969.50 was initiated by Merron transferring the amount received
from the ARP program to a UDT general fund account known as the PLGIT general fund account
x5013.
At all times prior to February 4, 2022, amounts received pursuant to the ARP application were
commingled with other UDT general account funds. At all times the general fund bank account
balances exceeded $20.88 million. Despite possible concerns expressed by UDT Council
members and others, regulations and other guidance published by the U.S. Treasury did not require
1
For purposes of this report, “ARP funds” refers to the $20,880,969.50 received from the U.S. Treasury on July 19,
2021 as part of the American Rescue Plan Act and the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and Coronavirus Local
Fiscal Recovery Fund.
2
Merron was Director of Finance from August, 2020 until his resignation on September 17, 2021, at which time he
became a part-time employee for the sole purpose of assisting with getting the financial statement audit completed.
Recently UDT engaged the accounting firm Brinker Simpson to serve as Interim Finance Director.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 2
At the February 2, 2022 UDT Council Meeting UDT Treasurer David Haman (“Haman”) stated
“we’re six million dollars less than we started with.” Haman’s comment was based on his
“treasurer’s report” which included only eleven general fund accounts and compared the ARP
funds to one general fund bank account. Investigation established Haman was incorrect. The
“Analysis of Operating Funds for the Month of December 2021” 3 contradicts this statement,
showing an “operating fund balance” of $1.9 million over the ARP amount received (i.e.
approximately $22.7 million compared to the $20.88 million of ARP funds). At the time of this
meeting Haman and Merron knew or should have known that Haman’s report was flawed based
on the “Analysis of Operating Funds for the Month of December 2021” prepared by Merron and
emailed to Haman on January 28, 2022.
Marcum performed analyses of the actual bank balances of general fund bank accounts comparing
them to the ARP funds from December 1, 2021 through February 7, 2022 and determined that the
actual bank balances exceeded the ARP funds at all times.
Merron prepared a “Revenue Replacement Schedule” in August 2021 to calculate $12 million of
ARP funds that were available as revenue replacement based on a reduction in revenue. Haman
made a presentation at an August 2021 Council Meeting citing the $12 million amount calculated
by Merron. Ultimately, UDT budgeted for $6 million of ARP funds to be used as revenue
replacement.
During the February 2, 2022 UDT Council Meeting, Ordinance No. 3111 was introduced to
approve the supplement of the ARP funds to the previously approved 2022 budget. The ordinance
made “…supplemental appropriations for the 2022 budget from the American Rescue Plan
Allocation” including $6 million of revenue replacement. Our inspection of available documents
and meeting transcripts shows that only $6 million for revenue replacement has been approved as
of May 10, 2022 and the remaining ARP funds have not been appropriated.
Since the remainder of the ARP funds have not yet been appropriated by Council, no contracts can
be executed to perform the services to use the ARP funds. States, localities, territories, and tribal
governments have until December 31, 2024 to obligate these funds and December 31, 2026 to
spend the ARP funds. 4 Council should appropriate the funds timely in order to allow UDT to use
the funds prior to expiration.
Despite numerous interviews, no person reported or provided information alleging misuse of the
ARP funds.
3
See page 1 of Exhibit 8A.
4
CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORITIES | CBPP.ORG
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 3
Our inquiries and inspection identified other issues that warrant disclosure to the
administration. These additional observations are set forth in subsequent sections of the
report.
Findings and conclusions presented in this correspondence are based upon the inspection and
analysis of numerous documents and discussions/interviews of multiple persons with relevant
information. The documents and other information considered are identified in Exhibit 1.
III. Scope
On February 2, 2022, Haman, made a presentation through Zoom connection to the UDT Council
in which he presented information concerning the alleged disposition of approximately $6.3
million of funds received as part of the ARP Act. This disclosure raised questions within UDT
Council and other UDT personnel as there had not been prior reports to Council regarding the use
of any of the approximately $20.88 million of ARP funds received in July 2021. Marcum LLP
was engaged by the Mayor of UDT to determine the existence and disposition of ARP funds
received by UDT.
The procedures and analyses performed in connection with the engagement do not constitute an
audit, review or attestation engagement as described in authoritative literature promulgated by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”). This engagement is a forensic
accounting services engagement and is subject to standards applicable to those types of
engagements. These standards require, among other things, the CPA to have sufficient evidentiary
material to support opinions and conclusions expressed during the conduct of an engagement.
The scope herein does not represent attest work of any kind, as defined by the AICPA, and
therefore, the scope of the work performed does not contemplate the audit, review or compilation
of financial statements. Marcum did not independently verify the documents and records which it
was provided with respect to this matter. This report is only applicable for the stated purposes of
this engagement, and accordingly, this report should not be used for any other purpose.
IV. Limitations
UDT currently uses a Harris Computer Software AS 400 system for its electronic accounting
software. The AS 400 system is an IBM product that is over thirty years old. Reports from the
UDT electronic accounting system cannot easily be exported to an Excel spreadsheet for analysis.
Reports from the AS 400 system print to what is referred to as “green bar” paper which is 11 inches
by 15 inches and produced on a dot matrix printer. We were provided with paper reports for our
review. UDT is in the process of moving to the OpenGov electronic accounting system. We
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 4
understand that Merron used data exported from AS 400 to create Excel spreadsheet workbooks
for analysis and presentation of the general ledger and financial statement data, but the process
was time consuming and inefficient.
This report is provided solely for your use in connection with our forensic accounting investigation
into the existence and possible disposition of the ARP funds received by UDT. No other use is
intended or authorized.
The findings set forth below arose from our inspection and analysis of documents and other
materials described in this report. I reserve the right to supplement or amend my findings based
upon the receipt of additional information.
Upper Darby Township became incorporated as a township on August 31, 1736. Upper Darby
Township is classified as a First Class Township operating under the Pennsylvania Home Rule
Charter. It is the sixth largest municipality in the State of Pennsylvania. 5
On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act was signed into law. This Act established the
Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (“SLFRF”)
which together are known as the SLFRF program. The SLFRF program is intended to provide
support to State and Local governments (among others) in responding to the economic and public
health impacts of COVID-19 on their communities, residents, and businesses. 6
In May 2021, Treasury published the Interim Final Rule (“IFR”) which described eligible and
ineligible uses of ARP funds (as well as other program provisions), sought feedback from the
public on these program rules, and began to distribute funds as presented in the IFR. 7 Recipients
of SLFRF awards have substantial discretion to use ARP funds in the ways that best suit the needs
of constituents, providing that such use fits into one of the following categories:
5
www.upperdarby.org
6
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting
Guidance, November 15, 2021 (Version 2.1), p. 2.
7
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule,
January, 2022.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 5
In fact, U.S. Treasury’s guidance on the ARP program was slowly trickling out and its Final Rule
was issued on January 6, 2022 which took effect April 1, 2022. The Final Rule includes restrictions
on use. Those restrictions include the following: 9
• States and territories may not use this funding to directly or indirectly offset a
reduction in net tax revenue resulting from a change in law, regulation, or
administrative interpretation beginning on March 3, 2021, through the last day of
the fiscal year in which the funds provided have been spent.
• No recipients except Tribal governments may use this funding to make a deposit to
a pension fund.
3. Additional Restrictions and Requirements, include, but are not limited to the following:
There was no U.S. Treasury requirement that ARP funds had to be maintained in a separate bank
account. The delays by U.S. Treasury created uncertainty to UDT as to how to appropriately spend
the ARP funds they received.
8
See Footnote 6, p. 3.
9
See Footnote 7.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 6
Deputy CAO Alison Dobbins (“Dobbins”) prepared and submitted the required documentation to
the U.S. Department of Treasury including registering for the ARP award using the ID.me system.
Part of the information required by the Treasury was the bank account and routing number for
where the ARP funds would be deposited. 10 Merron directed where the ARP funds should be
deposited by providing the account and routing number for the WF general fund operating account
x977311 to Dobbins via an email, subject “ARP Banking”, on June 4, 2021 (Exhibit 3).
The ARP funds were received via wire transfer from the U.S. Department of Treasury on July 19,
2021 into the WF general fund operating account x9773 per instructions sent by Dobbins. Between
July 20, 2021 and August 2, 2021, money was transferred from WF depository account x9773 to
the WF disbursements account x3731 for operating expenses and WF accounts x0901 and x8978
for payroll of the Township. Transfers between these accounts occurred in the normal course of
business.
On August 3, 2021 Merron initiated a wire transfer in the amount of $20,880,969.50 to transfer
the ARP funds from WF general fund operating account x9773 to PLGIT 12 general fund account
x5013.13 (Exhibit 4) In an email from Merron to Santander Bank dated August 22, 2021, Merron
informed his Santander representative that UDT will still need to add one or more ARP accounts
(Exhibit 5).
After the receipt of the ARP funds, Haman prepared and presented a PowerPoint during the August
18, 2021 UDT Council Meeting as part of his treasurer’s report (Exhibit 6). In the PowerPoint
presentation, Haman reports that “…preliminary calculations suggest that we qualify to use
10
We understand from Dobbins that she did not have knowledge of the UDT bank account numbers and had not seen
the list of 45 bank accounts of UDT in June 2021.
11
The American Rescue Plan does not require maintaining the ARP funds in a separate bank account. In fact,
recipients can place ARP funds in interest bearing accounts and do not need to remit the interest to the U.S. Treasury
(Compliance and Reporting Guidance SLFRF, page 7). However, maintaining a separate bank account could help
facilitate the recordkeeping and reporting required.
12
Pennsylvania Local Government Investment Trust (PLGIT) was created to meet the short-term investment needs
of local governments, school districts, municipal authorities, and other types of governments in the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania. PLGIT offers a wide array of investment options. (www.plgit.org)
13
The wire transfer was deducted on the Wells Fargo account statement x9773 on August 3, 2021 and deposited on
the PLGIT account x5013 statement on August 4, 2021.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 7
$12,925,079 of the ARP funds…” This amount was included on a “Revenue Replacement
Schedule” prepared by Merron to calculate the amount of “ARP funds” that can be used as revenue
replacement (Exhibit 7).
At the UDT Council Meeting on October 20, 2021, CAO Vincent Rongione (“Rongione”) and
Dobbins presented the initial ARP Budget which included proposed allocations of ARP funds.
This initial “ARPA Program Budget” proposed $6 million for revenue replacement. 14
During the February 2, 2022 UDT Council Meeting, Ordinance No. 3111 was introduced to
approve the supplement of the ARP funds to the previously approved 2022 budget. 15 Public
comment was solicited during the meeting. The ordinance made “the following supplemental
appropriations for the 2022 budget from the American Rescue Plan Allocation.”
Routinely, Treasurer Haman provided verbal reports to Council at its regularly scheduled meeting
on the third Wednesday of each month. 16 The Treasurer’s report summarized the “financial
condition” of UDT for the prior month end. These Treasurer’s reports were taken from information
provided by Merron to Haman entitled “Analysis of Operating Funds” on a monthly basis (Exhibit
8A). On January 28, 2022, Merron sent to Haman an email with the subject “This report is not
complete yet, but the CASH is correct.” (Exhibit 8B) 17 An Excel workbook titled “Treasurer’s
Cash Analysis” was attached which is the “Analysis of Operating Funds” reports Haman used to
prepare his monthly Treasurer’s report (Exhibit 8A). We understand the “Analysis of Operating
Funds” Reports were never provided to the Mayor or her Administration.
During the Council Meeting on February 2, 2022, Haman provided a treasurer’s report over
Zoom 18 that was different from the prior months. The February 2, 2022 Treasurer’s report was
not a verbal report of the representation of the financial condition of UDT, but rather a document
with adjusted bank balances for the months July through December 2021 of eleven select township
14
Upper Darby Council Meeting of October 20, 2021 minutes and exhibits.
15
UDT operates on a calendar year (1/1 – 12/31).
16
We reviewed the video of the Treasurer’s Report for August, October, November and December 2021 and January
2022. There was no Treasurer’s report in October 2021 due to the resignation of the Director of Finance and the
January 2022 report for the 2021 year-end was moved to February 2022.
17
Exhibit 8A is the attachment referenced on the email in Exhibit 8B.
18
Haman was out of town for the February 2, 2022 meeting and could not attend in person.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 8
bank accounts (Exhibit 9). 19 The following four paragraphs are excerpts from Haman’s Zoom
presentation of the document.
“…You're looking at a select number of accounts from the general fund and these are the
I selected these accounts based upon where ARP money could possibly be and I excluded
all the funds where ARP money could not be we have 45 I say funds I’m sorry bank accounts
we have 45 bank accounts and only this select group right here of about 11 of them could
have anything to do with at this time the unallocated uh unearmarked ARP money…”
“…You'll see the uh PLGIT it's it stands for Pennsylvania Local Government um
Investment Trust. It's just a type of account where we can put money and we can earn
interest on the money. So in July twenty million eight hundred and eighty thousand dollars
and a pizza party uh came in uh to our um our general checking account first. And then it
was moved during July down to the PLGIT so that it could earn interest. … In August uh
the money was still there. Remember anything uh for the first 20.8 million dollars is uh
ARP money everything above that is just money that we're holding to earn some interest
until we need it. When we get into September at some point here in September 36 million
dollars was moved from PLGIT uh including all of the ARP money down into account
called PLGIT prime.” 20
“…So we're hanging on to the end of the year but you can see that that the account in
October is in excess of 20 million $880,000. We moved to December and there's a very
very small change in that account. Here is my question we get to the end of December and
now there's only 14 million 497 thousand dollars and that pizza party um at the end of the
month in December and I have no other conclusion to draw except that that's all that money
is ARP money. And and there's six million and we're six million dollars less than we started
with.”
“…So if I if I take the ARP fund at the g1at the bottom here you see this this last civil
summation if I take the uh 20.8 million dollars of ARP funds and I um move the uh and I
subtract the the PLGIT prime account I don't know where $6.3 million of this money went.
Again I’m not suggesting there's any problem here. Um I just need to find out what's going
on that's all.”
During the public comment on Ordinance No. 3111, Haman further discussed the “treasurer’s
report” presented earlier in the meeting.
19
We understand that the report presented on February 2, 2022 was an excerpt of an “Adjusted Cash Balance” report
prepared by Erica Mellon of the Finance Department that summarizes the reconciled cash balances for all bank
accounts. It is our understanding that Mellon has been reconciling the bank accounts and preparing the same report
for a number of years.
20
The balance for the PLGIT accounts for July and August were summarized on one line and entered on General
Fund-Cash PLGIT on the “treasurer’s report.” There was not a transfer from General Fund-Cash PLGIT to General
Fund-PLGIT Prime account in September. The balances in the General Fund-PLGIT Prime account were
$31,611,162.46 and $41,493,654.32 in July and August 2021, respectively.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 9
“So we finish the December spend finishes up with the PLGIT account where the ARP
money is at 14.49 million dollars. And that's below the 20.8 so that so what I’m posing to
council here is there's where you are as you discuss the ARP money and the ARP money
that's that you're going to allocate. I, I don't want to put any opinion on this I’m not trying
to put an opinion on this, I just want you to know what the numbers are. So that when you
start talking about the numbers you've got you've got them in front of you. Um and um so
the, the, the um missing piece here as far as I’m looking at, is this is this 6.3.”
Also, during the public comment, Rongione spoke as a member of the community. Rongione
alleged that Haman had available to him the “Analysis of Operating Funds” (Exhibit 8A) at the
time of the February 2nd “treasurer’s report.”
“So treasurer Haman was provided with the document the heading of which was Upper
Darby Township analysis of operating funds for the month of December 2021. That
document clearly indicates that in total uh our operating cash balance is in excess of 22.5
million dollars, so that document clearly indicates that there is more than the ARP funding
available in our operating cash account. That information was provided to the treasurer.”
Various emails sent by Merron to participants at the February 2, 2022 meeting indicate that he
watched the meeting live on YouTube. In an email dated February 2, 2022 at 8:53PM to Sean
Kilkenny21 (Exhibit 10), Merron stated:
In our discussion we specifically asked Merron what information he had regarding the “overspend
that used $6.3 million.” Merron provided no information except Haman’s report which merely
subtracted the reconciled balance in the PLGIT account from the original amount of ARP funds
and included only selected general fund accounts on the “treasurer’s report.”
During the same meeting, Merron sent another email dated February 2, 2022 at 9:26PM to Sean
Kilkenny and others (Exhibit 11) where he stated:
“For the record, Alison directed the money into the General Fund. When I found out
(a full month after the fact), I objected vehemently!!!” 22
This email is contradicted by an email dated June 4, 2021 (Exhibit 3) with the subject line “ARP
Banking” wherein Merron provided Dobbins with the WF general fund bank account and routing
number. Therefore, Merron could not have found out a full month after the fact as he contends
21
Sean Kilkenny from Kilkenny Law, LLC is currently the Solicitor for Upper Darby Township.
22
The Alison referenced in this email is Alison Dobbins.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 10
above. We asked Merron about the June 4, 2021 email with the subject line “ARP Banking”, his
response was he must have been responding to something Dobbins asked. At our request UDT
performed a search of UDT email. The search did not locate any email from Dobbins to Merron
on or about that date regarding the deposit of ARP Funds.
Fifteen days after receipt of the ARP funds, Merron initiated a wire transfer of the ARP funds from
the WF general fund bank account to the PLGIT general fund bank account where the ARP funds
were commingled with other Township revenue (Exhibit 4). As of August 22, 2021 Merron had
not yet opened an account to hold the ARP funds (Exhibit 5).
Ordinance No. 3111 was tabled during the February 2, 2022 meeting after the Treasurer’s report
and the public comments.
We understand that the document presented by Haman at the February 2, 2022 meeting had not
been circulated to UDT Administration prior to being produced at the meeting. Rongione
expressed concern with the “treasurer’s report” not being circulated to relevant parties prior to the
meeting.
“So I really think that there's a reason why these conversations and information should be
shared in advance with one another. Like if I had had any kind of appropriate warning to
analyze this document that was handed out I would have been able to point out the
discrepancies and the reason why it doesn't accurately show what's happening.”
Debbie Nifong (“Nifong”) of the Finance Department reviewed the “treasurer’s report” from
February 2nd and prepared an email with her observations (Exhibit 12). A summary of Nifong’s
observations follow:
• The top section is a subset of UDT’s bank accounts (eleven of forty-five used). The
balances of December and November were compared to show that approximately $14
million was spent in December 2021.
• The lower part only compares the PLGIT account balance to the ARP funds to show that
approximately $6 million of the ARP funds were “spent.”
• Only eleven of the sixteen operating accounts were used on the “treasurer’s report.” If all
sixteen accounts were used, the total cash in the operating funds would exceed the ARP
funds by $1.9 million.
Dobbins received correspondence from PLGIT verifying the account balance in account x5050 of
$20,880,696 as of February 7, 2022 (Exhibit 13). 23 Exhibit 14 details the transactions in both the
PLGIT general fund account x5013 and the PLGIT ARP account x5050 through the end of
February 2022.
The PLGIT ARP account x5050 was opened on February 4, 2022 with transfers from the PLGIT
general fund account x5013 totaling $13,581,101.21. Additionally, the following transfers into
the PLGIT ARP account x5050 were made on February 7, 2022:
The above transactions brought the balance in the PLGIT ARP account x5050 to $20,880,969.
During the February 7, 2022 emergency meeting, Treasurer Haman stated the following about the
ARP funds:
“…thank you 20 million wasn't lost no money was lost but with the reason this we're here
talking about this right now is that um we had an account where all the all the ARP money
was in an account … and then I saw that that account was below the balance nobody the
money wasn't lost I just simply asked the question where is the money…”
“…Well we do know that we have an account with twenty point eight million dollars in it,
it's all the COVID all the money that represents the COVID allocation is there…”
VIII. Interviews of UDT Current and Former Employees, Officers and Officials
As part of our engagement, we conducted Zoom interviews with the following current and former
Township employees, officers, and officials:
1. David Haman
2. Gary Merron
3. Erica Mellon
4. Debbie Nifong
23
A copy of this letter was posted to social media prior to the UDT Council Meeting by Joe Holden, a reporter for
CBS3 in Philadelphia.
24
We understand that the Citizen account held general funds that were reimbursements from a federal reimbursable
grant. In other words, UDT already spent the money for a specific purpose and was reimbursed by the federal
government.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 12
5. Alison Dobbins
6. Vince Rongione
7. Mayor Barbarann Keffer
We also requested a Zoom interview with Laura Wentz (“Wentz”), Upper Darby Township
Council Vice President, Councilwoman At Large and the Chair of the Finance Committee.
Email communications from Wentz to Sean Kilkenny suggested Wentz possessed evidence of
misuse of ARP funds (Exhibit 15A). 25 Also, in a news article, Wentz was quoted as saying “Not
only do we believe we have proof showing that the funds were spent . . .”. 26 As a result of these
allegations, Wentz was invited several times to join us for a Zoom interview. She requested our
engagement letter and questions in advance before agreeing to meet. The engagement letter was
provided by the Administration but ultimately Wentz declined the invitation by stating “I do not
see any justification for you to need to speak to me or any Council Member.” (Exhibit 15B).
No person interviewed in the course of our investigation reported or provided information alleging
misuse of the ARP funds.
We spoke to Haman and discussed with him the “Treasurer’s Report” that was presented at the
February 2, 2022 Council Meeting, included herein as Exhibit 9. Haman confirmed that Exhibit
9 is a copy of the document he presented at the February 2, 2022 meeting.
He did not provide any additional explanation on how he determined where ARP money could be
other than he believed the accounts listed were unrestricted general funds. We noted that Haman
excluded several general fund bank accounts from his presentation without any explanation. Yet,
every month he had received the entire list of general fund bank accounts with adjusted bank
balances. Haman in his interview stated that he regrets the wording he used and that he should not
have labeled it on the document he presented as “ARP funds spent.”
In scheduling the interview with Merron, he requested to have counsel sit in on the meeting
(Exhibit 16). However, when asked in the interview if counsel, Christopher Boggs (“Boggs”) was
representing Merron personally, it was disclosed by both Merron and Boggs that Boggs was
working for Council on their investigation. Boggs specifically stated he was not representing
Merron, but that he was representing Township Council and not advising Merron. Despite the
lack of clarity initially provided by Merron, we permitted Boggs to sit in on the Merron interview.
During the interview, Merron stated on multiple occasions that he was working for “law
25
See pages 8 and 9 on Exhibit 15A.
26
https://broadandliberty.com/2022/02/15/upper-darby-councilwoman-says-investigation-into-mayor-likely-we-
have-proof-showing-that-the-funds-were-spent/
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 13
enforcement.” Merron refused to identify any law enforcement agency or personnel with whom
he was working.
Merron stated that he had an MBA and was a CPA. When questioned whether he was currently a
CPA, he admitted that his license had expired. When asked whether he informed UDT at any time
such as on his resume, in the hiring process, or in public meetings that his CPA license was expired,
he stated he “remained silent” on that. However, at various times he identified himself as a CPA
(Exhibits 17A – 17D). 27 28
Merron also stated during the interview that he was the only accountant in the Department and that
no one else in Administration had taken an accounting class. 29 Merron was critical of the UDT
accounting system and stated that the problems preceded the current administration. Additionally,
Merron stated he had no prior governmental accounting experience but spent most of his career in
commercial real estate.
During our interview, Merron shared his personal computer screen and displayed UDT documents
similar to those he prepared when he was the Finance Director for UDT, indicating that Merron
currently maintained UDT documents in electronic form on his home computer (Exhibit 18A).
Merron informed us that he did email Township files to his personal home computer to work from
home. It appears that he continued to analyze Township financial information after he was no
longer a full-time employee (only assisting with the 2020 audit, on a part-time basis). As an
example, Merron forwarded to his personal email on January 28, 2022, an email from Bill
Murphey30 which included as one of the attachments the General Ledger as of December 31, 2021.
(Exhibit 18B) Merron also continued to analyze Township information after he fully resigned.
When requested, Merron refused to provide any of the documents he had on his computer during
the interview. These actions may be in violation of the Township’s computer policy (Exhibit 19).
Merron stated that he observed that the pension payment was made in December 2021 rather than
October 2021, as had been done in prior years. We understand that these pension plan payments
are referred to as Minimum Municipal Obligations. During our interview with Nifong, she stated
that UDT receives a portion of their annual pension plan payment from the state and that portion
must be paid out within a certain number of days. The state portion of the pension plan payment
was made in October as required. UDT’s portion of the pension plan payment was due by
December 31st and was paid before the due date. This was corroborated by Dobbins and supported
by the bank statements. We noted that ARP funds were not used to pay these pension plan
obligations.
27
The resume provided to UDT identifies the AICPA as an affiliation of Merron’s.
28
The CPA reference on Merron’s LinkedIn account has subsequently been removed.
29
During various interviews we learned that Dobbins had an accounting course and took several business courses,
Colleen Rose, who handles Accounts Payable has taken accounting courses, James Wilson who previously reported
to Merron had an accounting degree, and Marolyn Bailey had numerous years of bookkeeping/accounting experience.
30
Bill Murphey’s title is Information Technology on the email.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 14
During the interview we asked Merron if he identified or was aware of any inappropriate uses of
ARP funds by UDT. Merron stated that he reviewed the entire check register and that he did not
find any inappropriate payments.
According to Note A of the Notes to 2020 Financial Statements, 31 the Accounting principles and
practices of UDT are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) and all relevant Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) pronouncements are
applied.
UDT uses Fund accounting which is an accounting system for recording resources whose use has
been limited by the donor, grant authority, governing agency, or by law. Fund accounting
emphasizes accountability rather than profitability.
By way of further explanation, a general fund is the primary fund used by a government entity.
This fund is used to record all resource inflows and outflows that are not associated with special-
purpose funds. The activities being paid for through the general fund constitute the core
administrative and operational tasks of the government entity.
Unrestricted cash refers to cash that is readily available to be spent for any purpose and has not
been pledged as collateral for a debt obligation or other purpose.
An encumbrance is a restriction placed on the use of funds. The concept is most commonly used
in governmental accounting, where encumbrances are used to ensure that there will be sufficient
cash available to pay for specific obligations.
A more detailed discussion of the funds of UDT is included in its Notes to Financial Statements,
Township of Upper Darby Financial Statements and Supplementary Information, Year Ended
December 31, 2020.
31
Township of Upper Darby, Delaware County, Pennsylvania, Notes to Financial Statements, December 31, 2020.
32
Highlighted entries on Exhibit 20 calculated by Marcum LLP.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 15
Due to shortfalls in revenue related to the timing of the receipt of tax payments, UDT typically
borrows in January of each year through a Tax Revenue Anticipation Note (“TRAN”). 33 Since
UDT received the ARP funds, they chose not to get a TRAN which saved them in interest expense.
It is also our understanding that in order to obtain a TRAN, UDT would have been required to
have their 2020 audit completed and financial statements issued.
We inspected all the general fund and payroll bank accounts. The multiple general fund bank
accounts were established to collect, track and disburse funds based on source and purpose. UDT’s
practice is to deposit tax revenues in the PLGIT general fund account which earns interest. As
needed, cash is transferred from PLGIT to the WF 34 general fund depository account to pay for
operating expenses of UDT.
For example, a wire transfer is initiated from the PLGIT general fund account to the WF general
fund account and deposited along with the other revenue of UDT. Once the money is in the WF
general fund account, the money is either transferred to the payroll accounts for payroll expenses
including payroll taxes or the disbursement account to pay the operating expenses of the Township.
UDT also maintains certain general fund accounts that collect revenue from specific sources, such
as parking meters, to more easily track the revenue type. Revenue from parking meters is deposited
to the parking meter bank account, but the use of the money is not restricted. The money can be
transferred to the general fund accounts as needed to cover the operating expenses of the Township.
Dobbins explained during the February 7, 2022 emergency Council Meeting, the Township
maintained 45 bank accounts. UDT was establishing a new banking relationship with Santander,
a transition that was started by Merron and had not yet been completed.
As previously discussed, Haman provided a report to Council on February 2, 2022 that purported
to demonstrate a reduction in ARP funds at December 31, 2021 based on only eleven adjusted
bank account balances. Haman ultimately compared the ARP amount only to the PLGIT general
fund account and disregarded all other general fund accounts with cash balances that were
available for operating and payroll expenses. We prepared analyses comparing general fund
month-end account balances, both adjusted and bank statement balances, to the ARP funds. We
also compared daily bank balances to the ARP amount.
Exhibit 21 compares the month-end reconciled account balances for all general fund accounts
including payroll for the period July 2021 through February 2022. The month-end reconciled
balances exceed the ARP fund amount at each month-end except January 2022 where ARP funds
exceeded the reconciled balance by $71,573.57. This appears to be merely a timing issue as
33
A TRAN is a short-term loan that municipalities can use to address a cash flow problem created when expenditures
must be incurred before tax revenues are received.
34
The general fund operating accounts were moved to Santander Bank the last quarter of 2021.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 16
approximately $84,000 and $154,000 of check deposits were made on February 1, 2022 and
February 2, 2022, respectively. It should also be noted that the month-end adjusted balance
accounts for outstanding checks that have not been presented to the bank. Therefore, the ARP
funds are less than the anticipated balance but not less than the actual bank balance for the month-
end January 2022. In February, the reconciled balance exceeded the ARP funds by over $2.3
million.
The bank reconciliations for the WF and the Santander general fund accounts included the list of
outstanding checks at January 31, 2022. The listing of outstanding checks of $32,187.94 for the
WF general fund include “stale dated” 35 checks totaling $32,168.87.
The Santander general fund checks specifically state on the face of the check “VOID AFTER 90
DAYS.” The outstanding check list for the Santander general fund account totals $546,929.90
with $23,588.60 in checks outstanding for greater than 90 days. “Stale dated” checks are typically
written off or voided and the amounts returned to the adjusted (reconciled) balance of the account.
The month-end bank statement balances were also compared to the ARP amount of $20.88 million.
Exhibit 22 compares the month-end bank statement balances for all general fund accounts
including payroll for the period July 2021 through February 2022. The month-end bank statement
balances exceeded the ARP amount in each month.
Similar to the comparisons above, the daily bank balance for all general fund and payroll bank
accounts each business day from December 1, 2021 through February 7, 2022 were compared to
the ARP amount. Exhibit 23 demonstrates that the daily bank balance exceeded the ARP amount
each day from December 1, 2021 through February 7, 2022.
X. Other Observations
Our inquiries and inspection identified other issues that warrant disclosure to the
administration.
Merron’s inaccurate representations that he was a CPA may constitute a violation of the “Acts
Discreditable Rule” of the AICPA Rules of Professional Conduct 36 and the State of Maryland’s
35
Stale dated checks are generally considered to be outstanding for six months or longer.
36
Section 3.400.090 of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct entitled False, Misleading, or Deceptive Acts in
Promoting or Marketing Services states as follows:
.01 “A member would be in violation of the “Acts Discreditable Rule” [3.400.001] if the
member promotes or markets the member’s abilities to provide services or makes claims
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 17
Our analysis and interviews suggest there may be confusion over terms such as “adjusted bank
balances” versus “actual bank balance” and the terms “fund” and “account”. Examples include
the following:
• Haman isn’t clear that he is showing adjusted bank balances which are net of all
outstanding checks issued.
• Laura Wentz states in an email dated February 1, 2022 (Exhibit 24) 39 “You have not
agreed to putting all of the ARP Funds into their own separate bank account thusly creating
a new Fund for the ARP Funds.”
“01. A member should maintain the confidentiality of his or her former employer’s confidential
information and should not use or disclose any confidential employer information obtained
as a result of an employment relationship, such as discussions with the employer’s vendors,
customers, or lenders (for example, any confidential information pertaining to a previous
employer, subsidiary, affiliate, or parent thereof, as well as any entities for which the
member worked in a volunteer capacity).
...
.04 A member should not use confidential employer information acquired as a result of a prior
employment relationship to his or her personal advantage or the advantage of a third
party, such as a current or prospective employer. The requirement to maintain the
confidentiality of an employer’s confidential information continues even after the end of
the relationship between a member and the employer. However, the member is entitled to use
experience and expertise gained through prior employment relationships.
.05 A member would be considered in violation of the “Acts Discreditable Rule” [3.400.001]
if the member discloses or uses any confidential employer information acquired as a
result of former employment or volunteer relationships without the proper authority or
specific consent of the former employer or organization for whom the member may work
in a volunteer capacity, unless there is a legal or professional responsibility to use or disclose
such information.”
39
See page 3 on Exhibit 24.
Mayor Barbarann Keffer
May 19, 2022
Page 18
We understand that Brinker Simpson & Company (“Brinker Simpson”), a regional CPA firm, was
engaged to fill the position of interim Finance Director. Part of their role is to assist with the
transfer of the UDT electronic accounting records from the AS 400 system to OpenGov. In
addition to the engagement of Brinker Simpson, UDT engaged UHY, LLP, a CPA firm, for
consultation services related to the ARP funds.
XI. Summary
At all times prior to February 4, 2022, amounts received pursuant to the ARP application were
commingled with other UDT general account funds. At all times the general fund bank account
balances exceeded $20.88 million. Despite possible concerns expressed by UDT Council
members and others, regulations and other guidance published by the U.S. Treasury did not require
amounts remitted to municipalities pursuant to ARP be maintained in a separate deposit account.
The Treasury guidance did limit the manner in which ARP funds could be used.
At the February 2, 2022 UDT Council Meeting Haman stated “we’re six million dollars less than
we started with.” Haman’s comment was based on his “treasurer’s report” which included only
eleven general fund accounts and compared the ARP funds to one general fund bank account.
Investigation established Haman was incorrect. The “Analysis of Operating Funds for the Month
of December 2021” 40 contradicts this statement, showing an “operating fund balance” of $1.9
million over the ARP amount received (i.e. approximately $22.7 million compared to the $20.88
million of ARP funds). At the time of this meeting Haman and Merron knew or should have
known that Haman’s report was flawed based on the “Analysis of Operating Funds for the Month
of December 2021” prepared by Merron and emailed to Haman on January 28, 2022.
Marcum performed analyses of the actual bank balances of general fund bank accounts comparing
them to the ARP funds from December 1, 2021 through February 7, 2022 and determined that the
actual bank balances exceeded the ARP funds at all times.
Merron prepared a “Revenue Replacement Schedule” in August 2021 to calculate $12 million of
ARP funds that were available as revenue replacement based on a reduction in revenue. Haman
made a presentation at an August 2021 Council Meeting citing to the $12 million amount
calculated by Merron. Ultimately, UDT budgeted for $6 million of ARP funds to be used as
revenue replacement.
During the February 2, 2022 UDT Council Meeting, Ordinance No. 3111 was introduced to
approve the supplement of the ARP funds to the previously approved 2022 budget. The ordinance
made “…supplemental appropriations for the 2022 budget from the American Rescue Plan
Allocation” including $6 million of revenue replacement. Our inspection of available documents
and meeting transcripts shows that only $6 million for revenue replacement has been approved as
of May 10, 2022 and the remaining ARP funds have not been appropriated.
40
See page 1 of Exhibit 8A.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS / EXHIBITS
Attachment A: Marcum LLP Advisory Services Profile including Litigation and Forensic Services
Attachment B: CVs of Kyle Anne Midkiff, CPA, CFE, CFF, Engagement Partner, and Nicole
Donecker, CPA, CVA, CAMS, Senior Manager
Exhibit 1: Documents and Information Considered
Exhibit 2: April 7, 2021 email from Barbarann Keffer to Vincent Rongione, Gary Merron and
Alison Dobbins re: Finance Meeting Agenda
Exhibit 3: June 4, 2021 email from Gary Merron to Alison Dobbins re: ARP Meeting
Exhibit 4: August 3, 2021 wire transfer receipt from Wells Fargo to PLGIT
Exhibit 5: August 22, 2021 email from Gary Merron to Santander Bank, copy to Erica Mellon
re: Schedule of Bank Accounts
Exhibit 6: August 18, 2021 Upper Darby Township Presentation: Coronavirus Recovery
Funds
Exhibit 7: Revenue Replacement Schedule
Exhibit 8A: Analysis of Operating Funds for the months October 2020 through December 2021
Exhibit 8B: January 28, 2022 email from Gary Merron to David Haman re: “This report is not
complete yet, but the CASH is correct.”
Exhibit 9: February 2, 2022 document re: adjusted bank balances for the months July through
December 2021
Exhibit 10: February 2, 2022 email from Gary Merron to Sean Kilkenny, Vince Rongione,
Alison Dobbins, David Haman, Laura Wentz, Barbarann Keffer and Courtney
Richardson re: Treasurer’s Report
Exhibit 11: February 2, 2022 email from Gary Merron to Sean Kilkenny, Alison Dobbins,
Barbarann Keffer, Courtney Richardson, David Haman, Laura Wentz and Vince
Rongione re: ARP Funds
Exhibit 12: February 11, 2022 email from Debbie Nifong to: Vincent Rongione, Alison
Dobbins and Mike Atwell re: February 2 Treasurer’s Report
Exhibit 13: February 7, 2022 Correspondence from PLGIT to Alison Dobbins verifying the
balance of account x5050
Exhibit 14: Marcum LLP prepared analysis of PLGIT Accounts x5013 and PLGIT x5050 for
the period July 2021 through February 2022
Exhibit 15A: January 27, 2022 email from Sean Kilkenny to Vincent Rongione, Barbarann
Keffer, and Courtney Richardson re: Upper Darby Finance Committee
Amendments to ARP Ord. 3111 (14 messages)
Exhibit 15B: May 3, 2022 email from Laura Wentz to Kyle Midkiff, Nicole Donecker, Meaghan
Wagner, Brian Andruszko, [email protected] and Christopher Boggs re:
Meeting Request
Exhibit 16: March 10, 2022 email from Gary Merron to Kyle Midkiff, Nicole Donecker and
Christopher Boggs re: Upper Darby Township Meeting Request
Exhibit 17A: December 6, 2020 Updated August 19 2021 Daily Times Letter to the Editor by
Gary Merron: Some Clarification on Upper Darby’s Financial Picture
Exhibit 17B: Screenshot from the February 7, 2022 Upper Darby Council Meeting with
transcript from 39:31 through 40:59
Exhibit 18: Screenshot of Gary Merron’s computer screen on March 16, 2022 showing UDT
document “Consolidated (Combined & Condensed) Revenue & Expense Report”
Exhibit 19: January 6, 2021 Upper Darby Township Memorandum from Vincent Rongione to
All Employees re: Use of Township Computers, Emails and other Online
Resources
Exhibit 20: December 31, 2021 Prior Year Comparative Consolidated Revenue & Expense
Report and December 31, 2021 Year-by-Month Consolidated Revenue & Expense
Report Marcum LLP calculations
Exhibit 21: Marcum LLP prepared Summary of Reconciled Balances comparing ARP Funds
to the month-end reconciled account balances for all general and payroll accounts
for July 2021 through February 2022
Exhibit 22: Marcum LLP prepared summary of Bank Balances comparing ARP Funds to
Month Ending Bank Balances for general and payroll accounts for July 2021
through February 2022
Exhibit 23: Marcum LLP prepared Summary of Daily Bank Balances comparing ARP Funds
to Daily Bank Balances for general and payroll accounts for December 1, 2021
through February 7, 2022
Exhibit 24: February 2, 2022 email from Vincent Rongione to Matt Silva, Laura Wentz, Brian
Andruszko, Brian Burke, Meaghan Wagner, Sean Kilkenny, Courtney Richardson,
Barbarann Keffer, David Haman and Alison Dobbins
Exhibit C
Title 65 § 712.1. Notification of agency business required and
exceptions.
(a) Official action.--Except as provided in subsection (b),
(c), (d) or (e), an agency may not take official action on a
matter of agency business at a meeting if the matter was not
included in the notification required under section 709(c.1)
(relating to public notice).
(b) Emergency business.--An agency may take official action
at a regularly scheduled meeting or an emergency meeting on a
matter of agency business relating to a real or potential
emergency involving a clear and present danger to life or
property regardless of whether public notice was given for the
meeting.
(c) Business arising within 24 hours before meeting.--An
agency may take official action on a matter of agency business
that is not listed on a meeting agenda if:
(1) the matter arises or is brought to the attention of the
agency within the 24-hour period prior to the meeting; and
(2) the matter is de minimis in nature and does not involve
the expenditure of funds or entering into a contract or
agreement by the agency.
(d) Business arising during meeting.--If, during the conduct
of a meeting, a resident or taxpayer brings a matter of agency
business that is not listed on the meeting agenda to the
attention of the agency, the agency may take official action to
refer the matter to staff, if applicable, for the purpose of
researching the matter for inclusion on the agenda of a future
meeting, or, if the matter is de minimis in nature and does not
involve the expenditure of funds or entering into a contract or
agreement, the agency may take official action on the matter.
(e) Changes to agenda.--
(1) Upon majority vote of the individuals present and
voting during the conduct of a meeting, an agency may add a
matter of agency business to the agenda. The reasons for the
changes to the agenda shall be announced at the meeting before
any vote is conducted to make the changes to the agenda. The
agency may subsequently take official action on the matter added
to the agenda. The agency shall post the amended agenda on the
agency's publicly accessible Internet website, if available, and
at the agency's principal office location no later than the
first business day following the meeting at which the agenda was
changed.
(2) This subsection shall not apply to a conference or a
working session under section 707 (relating to exceptions to
open meetings) or an executive session under section 708
(relating to executive sessions).
(f) Minutes.--If action is taken upon a matter of agency
business added to the agenda under this section, the minutes of
the meeting shall reflect the substance of the matter added, the
vote on the addition and the announced reasons for the addition.
(June 30, 2021, P.L.350, No.65, eff. 60 days)
“Upper Darby residents have the opportunity to speak for three (3) minutes. Residents are
prohibited from making threats, using profanity, or acting in a manner that would impede or
prevent the conduct of the business of the meeting.” Public Forum should not exceed thirty (30)
minutes.”
FOP representative
1
(a) Motion to appoint a Solicitor to represent Council members at Council meetings
*Motion to approve
9.7 Public Health and Environmental Affairs Committee
Chair: Danyelle Blackwell
Members: Hafiz Tunis Jr., Sheikh M. Siddique, Matt Silva
9.8 Community Engagement Committee
Chair: Hafiz Tunis Jr.
Members: Danyelle Blackwell, Laura A. Wentz, Michelle Billups
9.9 Cultural Competency Committee
Chair: Michelle Billups
Members: Matt Silva, Danyelle Blackwell, Sheikh M. Siddique
9.10 Community Development Committee
Chair: Sheikh M. Siddique
Members: Hafiz Tunis Jr., Brian Andruszko, Laura A. Wentz
10.0 Solicitor
2
Exhibit E
“Upper Darby Council Meeting - 6/1/2022.” YouTube, uploaded by Upper Darby, streamed live
on June 1, 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh8sH0MP6Xs&t=13969s
Last Retrieved on July 1, 2022.
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP
100 GARRETT ROAD
UPPER DARBY, PA 19082-3135
MEMORANDUM
Knowing that Council Members’ job includes answering constituent complaints and concerns,
we are trying to formalize a system to streamline communication and best serve our residents.
You are encouraged to submit constituent requests through the Township website’s Requests
Line at www.upperdarby.org/contact/requests or [email protected].
The Mayor would like to remind the members of Township Council that all interactions with
Department Directors and their subordinate staff should be conducted through the Office of the
Municipal Clerk, in cooperation with the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer, who shall
facilitate the provision of information and access to Administration resources to the extent that it
is appropriate and possible to do so.
No direct requests for the use of Administration resources or information shall be made except
through this channel, other than through those forums for interaction that are normally available
to all other members of the public. Township Council members should refrain from entering
office areas that are otherwise restricted to members of the general public. Township employees
in departments other than that of the Office of the Municipal Clerk are instructed to respond to
directives only from their appropriate supervisors, and not from the members of Township
Council except as directed to do so by the Mayor or the CAO.
2 messages
Matt: I am writing today to inform you that my working conditions have seriously passed the point of what is reasonable or
acceptable. I am being persistently targeted and harassed and I can no longer sit silent while my mental and physical
health deteriorate and my family suffers immeasurable harm as a result. This is a very difficult email to write because I
love my job, my boss, and the opportunity that they provide me to serve our community. Unfortunately, and increasingly
over the last 25 months Councilwoman Laura Wentz has made my work-life harrowing and intolerable. She has
consistently and increasingly harassed me via email as well as in person and behind my back. She has increasingly and
consistently has threatened my job and to cut or eliminate my salary at meetings including myself, my boss, my
subordinates, and other Council people as well as in conversations where I was not present but I believe the intent was
for the information to get back to me and it did. Because she is an elected official and until recently served as the Council
President I never felt I could share these concerns for fear of retribution from her however, the needless anguish and
hardship they have caused me and my family cannot continue and so I must speak out. It would be difficult to overstate
the amount of stress and anxiety that she has created in my life. I have been trying to draft this email for weeks and even
longer in my mind and as I sit here now about to hit send my wife is out with our son on a simple regular
saturday morning trip to the store and the park that I could not participate in because of my level of anxiety and stress
created by yet another overtly hostile, wildly inaccurate, and accusatory email from Laura Wentz. This type of damage
and loss are immeasurable. Time that I can never get back with my family can never be properly compensated. Pain
caused to my wife and son that I will never be able to live down or forget. Her accusations are dangerous, knowingly
false, and of a character that is truly worrisome. I had hoped for some time that she would relent but it has only gotten
worse. It is truly horrible and no one should be forced to tolerate it simply to earn a living. She is clearly attempting to
harrass me into resigning and/or forcing me to quit. I do not know if there is anything that can be done but I simply could
not let these things go unsaid any longer.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=c5d000e1e0&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-7910233985534881095&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-3928141… 1/1