3.5) Axial Flow Compressors - Concepts and Problems
3.5) Axial Flow Compressors - Concepts and Problems
Here, C1 = C3.
The above equation is graphically represented on h-s diagram shown in Fig.3. The first term
on the right side of the above equation introduces the part of the work supplied by a rotor which is
converted into pressure due to diffusion action in rotor itself.
The second term represents the increment of kinetic energy in rotating cascade that has to be
converted into pressure energy in stationary cascade.
Comparing this equation to the work input to centrifugal compressor, we find that the term
2 2
𝐶𝑏𝑙2 − 𝐶𝑏𝑙1
centrifugal action is missing in axial flow compressors. Due to this reason the pressure ratio
2
per stage in axial flow compressor is much less than that of centrifugal compressor.
Polytropic efficiency
The concept of isentropic efficiency cannot be used to compare the performance of different
compressors. If there are many compressors which are working at different pressure ratios with
different isentropic efficiencies, then we can compare them with their polytropic efficiency to identify
the better compressor. The work input to compressor is given by
′
Wactual = cp (𝑇02 − 𝑇𝑜1 )
′ −𝑇 )
(𝑇02 𝑜1
= cp (𝑇𝑜2 − 𝑇𝑜1 )
(𝑇𝑜2 − 𝑇𝑜1 )
1 𝑇
= cp η 𝑇𝑜1 . (𝑇𝑜2 − 1)
isen 𝑜1
1 𝑝 (𝛾−1)⁄
= cp η 𝑇𝑜1 . [(𝑝𝑜2 ) 𝛾 − 1] --------- (eq.1)
isen 𝑜1
From above equation, it follows that for the same isentropic efficiency ηisen and pressure ratio po2/po1,
the work input to the compressor is proportional to the initial temperature. This means that in a
compressor of several stages having equal isentropic efficiency, each succeeding stage will have to
do much more work because it has to deal with a fluid of increased temperature delivered to it from
the preceding stage. Obviously, the overall isentropic efficiency which is a very good measure of
overall performance of machine is not suitable to compare two compressors having different pressure
ratio or stage. The concept of polytropic efficiency is used for such a comparison among
compressors.
Polytropic efficiency is nothing but the isentropic efficiency of one small stage of a multistage
compressor. This small stage efficiency is supposed to be constant for all the stages of a compressor
with infinite number of stages.
The Fig.4 is the presentation of a compressor having small stages of infinite number on T-s diagram.
For simplicity, let us assume that the gas is compressed from stagnation pressure p o1 to po2 in four
small stages of equal pressure ratio.
𝑑𝑇
Isentropic efficiency for one stage is given by 𝜂𝑖𝑠𝑒 = (𝑑𝑇 ′𝑜 )𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒
𝑜
Note:
𝛴 (𝑑𝑇𝑜′ ) = 𝛥𝑇 ′ 𝑜
From Fig.4,
𝛥𝑇𝑜 = (a-1) + (b-a) + (c-b) + (2-c)
𝛴(𝑑𝑇𝑜)𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 = (𝑎 − 1) + (𝑏" − 𝑎′ ) + (𝑐 " − 𝑏′ ) + (𝑑 " − 𝑐 ′ )
We know that on T-s diagram, the pressure lines diverge towards the right, hence
(𝑏" − 𝑎′ ) > (𝑏 − 𝑎) , (𝑐 " − 𝑏′ ) > (𝑐 − 𝑏) and (𝑑 " − 𝑐 ′) > (𝑏 − 𝑎)
Therefore,
𝛴(𝑑𝑇𝑜)𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 > (𝛥𝑇𝑜 )𝑚𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒
Thus the small stage isentropic efficiency, ηise which is constant for all the stages is called the
polytropic efficiency ( ηp) and is greater in magnitude than overall isentropic efficiency of the
machine.
10
11
Work done factor (λ): It is difficult to draw the actual velocity triangles at root, mean and tip because
the contraction of main stream cannot be estimated accurately. The axial velocity at the mean section
is known to be greater than the mean axial velocity and the mean blade section (and most of the span)
will do less work than is estimated from velocity triangles based on the mean axial velocity. The tip
and root sections might be expected to do more work because of the low values of axial velocity at
entry to these sections, but local stalling of the blades will reduce this work. This means that the
average temperature rise across the stage will be less than as estimated from velocity triangles based
on the mean through flow velocity. Howell suggested that the stagnation enthalpy rise across a stage
may be given by
cp. 𝛥𝑇𝑜 = λ. Cbl. (Ca2. tan α2 - Ca1. tan α1), where λ is a work done factor which may be
taken as approximately 0.85.
12
13
14
15
16
Fig.5
Fig.6
17
Fig.7
Fig.8
Fig.13
A is the condition when the valve is completely closed.
B is the Maximum pressure ratio point. That is also the maximum efficiency point.
E is the choking point (M=1) i.e, actual maximum flow rate point
F is the condition when the valve is completely opened. It is the theoretical maximum flow rate point.
Fig.9
Fig.10
21
Fig.11
Stalling
Stalling of a stage of axial flow compressor is defined as the aerodynamic stall or the breakaway of
the flow from suction side of the blade aerofoil. The breakaway of the flow from the suction side
may be due to lesser mass flow rate than designed value or due to non-uniformity in the blade profile.
Thus stalling is ahead phenomenon of surging. A multi-stage compressor may operate stable in the
unsurged region with one or more of the stages stalled and the rest of stages unstalled. In other words,
stalling is a local phenomenon whereas surging is a complete system phenomenon.
22