0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views3 pages

Assignment Pre Tri Brief Defendant X

This document is a pre-trial brief submitted by the defendant's counsel in a civil case regarding collection of money. It outlines the defendant's willingness to settle, claims and defenses of both parties, admitted facts, issues to be tried, evidence to be presented, availability for trial dates, and copy furnished to the private prosecutor.

Uploaded by

Neil Ryan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views3 pages

Assignment Pre Tri Brief Defendant X

This document is a pre-trial brief submitted by the defendant's counsel in a civil case regarding collection of money. It outlines the defendant's willingness to settle, claims and defenses of both parties, admitted facts, issues to be tried, evidence to be presented, availability for trial dates, and copy furnished to the private prosecutor.

Uploaded by

Neil Ryan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Republic of the Philippines

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT


5TH Judicial Region
Branch 28
Naga City

XYZA BADIOLA-DECLARO,
Plaintiff,

- versus - Civil Case No. XXXXX


For: Collection of sum of money

MARIE ANGELICA ARIMADO,


Defendants.

x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

PRE-TRIAL BRIEF

DEFENDANT, by counsel, respectfully submits his Pre-Trial Brief, as follows:

I. WILLINGNESS TO ENTER INTO AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT AND POSSIBLE TERMS


OF ANY SUCH SETTLEMENT

1.1. Plaintiff is open to settling this dispute amicably, subject to a concrete proposal that

is fair and reasonable and a reciprocal manifestation of openness from defendant,

1.2. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff respectfully

submits that the desired terms of any amicable settlement would involve, first, an admission of

amount due and owing to plaintiff and, second, a schedule of payments.

II. BRIEF STATEMENT OF CLAIMS AND DEFENSES

2.1 Plaintiff claims that defendant failed to pay the purchase price of FIVE HUNDRED

THOUSAND PESOS (Php 500,000.00) for the Emerald Brooch delivered to the defendant.

2.2 Defendant raise as defenses that no sale ever transpired and that the checks issued to

Ms. Arimado were stolen and the defendant’s signature forged.

III. FACTS AND OTHER MATTERS ADMITTED BY THE PARTIES

3.1. Defendant admits only those facts stated in their Answer, i.e., their personal

circumstances and the existence of the bank account and corresponding checks.

IV. ISSUES TO BE TRIED


4.1. Plaintiff submits that the following issue is subject to proof:

4.1.1. The loss of the defendant’s checks as the cause for the account’s closure and forgery of

his signature

4.2. Defendant submits that the following issues are subject to proof:

4.2.1. There was a contract of sale with the plaintiff;

V. EVIDENCE

5.1. Plaintiff intends to present the following witnesses:

5.1.1 Ms. Jobelle Manjares, to establish that the plaintiff and defendant actually met at

the Kinamown Bar & Rest0 Hotel, that the said brooch was the subject matter of a contract of

sale between the plaintiff and defendant, and that the defendant paid in cash FOUR HUNDRED

THOUSAND PESOS (P400,000) and issued the checks covering the balance;

5.1.2 Ms. Karla Codorniz, the companion of Ms. Manjares, as witness to the meeting

and the transaction;

5.2. Plaintiff reserves the right to present any and all documentary evidence, which

shall become relevant to rebut defendants’ claims in the course of trial as well as any other

witnesses whose testimony will become relevant to belie defendants’ witnesses, if necessary.

VI. RESORT TO DISCOVERY

6.1. Considering the relatively simple issues presented, plaintiff does not intend to avail

of discovery at this time;

6.2. Subject, however, to a concrete and reasonable request for discovery from

defendant, plaintiff reserves the right to resort to discovery before trial.

VII. AVAILABLE TRIAL DATES

May 14, 2015, June 24, 2015, June 30, 2015 and August 14, 2015.

Respectfully submitted
Naga City, May 5, 2015
NEIL RYAN R. DECLARO
Counsel for the Accused

IBP No. XXXXXXX


December 15, 2015
PTR No. XXXXX
MCLE Exemption No. _____
Roll No. XXXX
Copy Furnished:

Atty. Dorothy C. Arevalo


Private Prosecutor
3rd Floor PNB Bldg, Naga City

You might also like