Reaping the digital dividend?

Sport marketing’s move into esports: insights

from Germany

Kilian Kramer, David Wagner, Barbara Scheck

PLEASE CITE AS FOLLOWS

Kramer, K., Wagner, D., & Scheck, B. (2021). Reaping the digital dividend? Sport marketing’s

move into esports: insights from Germany. European Journal of International Management,

15(2/3), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2021.10032384

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 2

Reaping the digital dividend? Sport marketing’s move into esports: insights from

Germany

Kilian Kramer, David Wagner, Barbara Scheck

Abstract: This article analyses the role of esports for sponsors and sport clubs in the context of

their marketing activities. We start by positioning esports in the domain of sport technology,

innovation, and entrepreneurship. Then, we examine foundations of the esports industry, including

an analysis of the most relevant stakeholders in the ecosystem, and outline potential links to digital

marketing. We interviewed nine experts, representing distinct sport clubs, sponsors and consulting

agencies from Germany, with the aim of generating specific knowledge about characteristics of

sponsoring and marketing operations in the gaming industry, including reasons for entry, choosing

relevant marketing channels and implementation approaches. Additionally, we examine measures

of success, prevailing risks as well as future perspectives of the industry. In writing this paper, we

contribute to a better understanding of the nascent field of esports, specifically from a digital

marketing perspective. A central contribution of the study is the illustration of esports’ value for

sport marketers, while shedding light on how digital marketing potential can be leveraged on an

operational level. Based on our findings, we present several recommendations for sport marketing

managers to jump-start their esports engagement and provide an agenda for future research at the

intersection of sport management and digital marketing.

Keywords: esports industry; digital sports; sport marketing; content marketing; digital marketing;

sport sponsoring; competitive gaming; sport clubs; marketing activation; esports ecosystem;

sport technology; sport innovation; sport entrepreneurship

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 3

Introduction

In an increasingly digitised and automated world, globalisation, digitalisation and technological

innovation are major drivers of transformation processes. As a result, many companies are working

to establish digital strategies that lead them into a more digital future (Bharadwaj et al., 2013).

Marketing’s prominent role in this endeavour is no coincidence, since customer experience is often

considered an integral component of digital transformation initiatives (Westerman et al., 2014).

The abundance of digital customer data generates fundamentally novel opportunities to reach out

to and interact with consumers, particularly with help of customised or user-generated content

(Rogers, 2016).

The sport business is no exception (Ratten, 2011, 2019; Ströbel et al., forthcoming).

Nielsen, a market research company, conducted a study with executives to identify global sport

trends in 2018, emphasising the overall impact of digitalisation on the sport industry (Lovett, 2018).

The study’s results point to a prevailing transformation of sponsorship and the disruption of

distributors as well as an increasing focus on digital media exposure for sport organisations in

order to stay relevant. Content is king, the study concludes, since organisations are forced to

implement new ways to reach target audiences through digital services and technologies. The

study’s final trend – and the most visible synthesis of digitalisation and sport – is the evolution of

esports or, in simple terms, the industry of playing video games professionally (Lovett, 2018).

Esports has become a global phenomenon, having evolved into a spectator sport of

international scope and garnering recognition as an official part of the sport and entertainment

business. The sector attracts a rising number of renowned investors, sport clubs, and companies

that enrich the industry with capital and business expertise, accelerating the growth of awareness,

revenue and professionalisation (Adams et al., 2019; Scholz, 2019). To illustrate this point: In
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 4

2019, the global fan base of esports is estimated to encompass 454 million people (Pannekeet,

2019), the League of Legends World Championships were streamed online for almost 140 million

hours (Esports Charts, 2019), and the Intel Extreme Masters in Katowice drew over 174,000 live

spectators (ESL, 2019).

In a recent review, Funk et al. (2018, p. 12) encourage sport practitioners and sport

management academics to “devote increased attention to esports and embrace its commercial,

educational, and research potential”. Esports’ digital origin inherently implies the utilisation of

digital tools, which provides potential synergy effects for the digital marketing efforts of sport

organisations (Cunningham et al., 2018). According to Michael Heina, Nielsen’s head of esports

in Germany, “the interest in esports among most decision-makers is now certainly over 90%. But

when it comes to important details, the level of knowledge is often still very superficial” (Eberhardt,

2018). Thus, while it is clear that esports “should be attended (to) by marketers … the question

arises how” this should be done (Hallmann & Giel, 2018, p. 18).

Addressing this gap, our paper deals with the questions of why organisations should engage

in esports and how they should design their esports strategy to reach marketing objectives. This is

important because many sport marketers are currently unsure about how to respond to the

development in esports, i.e. whether to enter the field or not and, if so, how they may do so. In

order to answer these questions, we collected interview data from nine experts in the esports

industry. Our paper is the first to provide a multi-stakeholder view of digital marketing in the

domain of esports. A central contribution of the study is the illustration of esports’ value for sport

marketers, while shedding light on how digital marketing can be leveraged on an operational level.

Germany “is the largest European esports market and [furthermore] considered one of the

most significant markets worldwide” (Arkenberg et al., 2018, p. 7). A considerable number of
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 5

globally recognised esports entities are based in Germany, including the world’s largest event

organiser, ESL, the renowned team SK Gaming, the worlds’ largest gaming convention,

GamesCom, and the headquarters of Riot Games’ European top League of Legends Championship,

LEC. Against this background, the country surely provides an interesting setting for the study of

esports in a marketing context.

The paper is positioned in the domain of sport technology, innovation and entrepreneurship.

In Section 2, following a review of the theoretical foundations of esports, a presentation of its

status quo, and an overview of the basic characteristics of the industry, the foundations of digital

marketing are depicted with a focus on the critical aspects regarding esports. The empirical

investigation is described in Section 3 and the studies’ results are presented in Section 4. Section

5 discusses the findings of the interviews, followed by Section 6 on theoretical and managerial

implications as well as limitations and implications for further research. Section 7 concludes the

paper and provides a future outlook.

Theoretical Background

Esport technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship

In order to initiate technological innovations, sport organisations need some degree of creativity

and dedication. Innovations can occur in a variety of ways, from incremental to radical shifts. In a

rapidly changing global business environment, innovation and change are fundamental foci of

sport. As competition increases, it is through innovation and entrepreneurial spirit that sport

organisations will evolve to gain competitive advantage. Optimised scouting analysis, improved

injury prevention or tailor-made targeting of new audiences are just some benefits of implementing
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 6

new technologies, but “despite the practical usage of technological innovation in sport, the

academic literature is still at a nascent stage” (Ratten, 2019, p. 1).

There is great potential for both research and practice to better understand various attributes

of innovation in sports. Innovation is changing the way sport is practiced and how people connect

with sport. Therefore, sport may be considered an entrepreneurial process in which innovation and

change are key elements. The rapidly growing and developing sport marketing discipline is an

example of how entrepreneurship occurs through innovation, proactiveness and risk-taking

activities. Thus, the ability to innovate is a core requirement in sport, as it enables renewal and

change by optimising the status quo and encouraging new sports to develop (Ratten, 2011).

“Like anything that we currently use, all artefacts used in sports (and even sports

themselves) needed to be invented and implemented at some point in time” (Bogers, 2018, p. VIII).

In this paper, we will focus on the invention and implementation of a new type of sport, i.e. the

activity of competitively playing video games, also known as esports.

Esports

The origin of esports can be traced back to the year 1972 and the game Space Wars!, when Stanford

University held a tournament and distributed prizes to the winners (Baker, 2016). The emergence

of broadband internet and the founding of the first associations and teams during the 1990s were

critical milestones for the development of the esports industry. The entry of the streaming platform

Twitch in 2011 set the basis for the evolution as a spectator sport (Billings & Hou, 2019; Scholz,

2019). First studies show that spectator motives for esports and traditional sport seem to be

consistent (Pizzo et al., 2018; Shaw et al., 2019). The preliminary peak of interest was reached in
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 7

2019, when the League of Legends World Championships were streamed online for almost 140

million hours (Esports Charts, 2019).

Wagner (2006, p. 3), in one of the oldest accounts of the term, defines esports as “activities

in which people develop and train mental or physical abilities in the use of information and

communication technologies”. The main difference to traditional definitions of sport is the shift

from physical to mental activities. Going forward, we should expect that “the activities we will

accept as sport disciplines will change as our value system changes … due to technological

progress … The emergence of esports can thus be interpreted as a logical and irreversible

consequence of the transition from an industrial society to the information and communication-

based society of today” (Wagner, 2006, p. 2). According to the future scenarios of esports

described by Jonasson & Thiborg (2010), this statement reflects scenario two, where esport is part

of the hegemony of sport. However, the previous definition misses the competitive character of

esports and its differentiation from casual gaming. The demarcation between these terms is

sometimes blurred due to a lack of official association structures and reliable definitions, but it is

absolutely essential to consider. In simple terms, gaming is about the hobby of playing video games

and esports is the professional part with official tournaments, an advanced infrastructure, and cash

prizes (Adams et al., 2019; Reitman et al., 2019). Nevertheless, the gaming community and the

professional esports community interact with and feed each other, which has important

repercussions for the (digital) marketing of esports. Owing to similar characteristics, i.e. teams,

leagues, tactics, among other things, a comparison with the term sport appears obvious, although

discussions whether esports may be considered a sport are still ongoing (for some detailed

discussions, see Bowman & Cranmer, 2019; Hallmann & Giel, 2018; Heere, 2018). While this

discussion is important, Heere (2018, p. 21) highlights that “regardless of whether esports qualify
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 8

as sports, the activity of professional gaming should be examined in sport management because

they are a manifestation of sportification. Scholars should embrace esports and examine their

effects on our industry”.

The development of esports as a business sector is often described as a global youth

phenomenon, but in reality, there are two unequal gaming cultures, distinguished by the Eastern

and Western value systems (Wagner, 2006). The Eastern gaming culture represents the main driver

of the industry, since online multiplayer gaming first spread out pervasively especially in South

Korea and China in the course of the 90s. Furthermore, Asia will be the first continent to integrate

esports as an official medal sport in the Continental Games in 2022 (Graham, 2017). Just before

the next Olympic Games in Tokyo will start, the International Olympic Committee is planning to

hold an esports tournament in the disciplines Rocket League and Streetfighter V in collaboration

with the Electronic Sports League and Intel (Chan, 2019).

Esports in Western culture is not as well accepted by society, but it is receiving more and

more attention, which can be seen in rising viewership and revenue figures as well as the founding

of national esports associations. In Europe, a European Esports Federation is currently being

established, as stated in the “Berlin Declaration” (ESBD, 2019). Esports has also been included in

the German government’s most recent coalition agreement, paving the way for it to become an

official sport (ESBD, 2018). A rising number of global events have attempted to bring the Eastern

and Western cultures closer together, but different consumer needs impede true unity; thus, the

gaming cultures “remain largely separated and seem to develop almost independently. his,

however, is not unlike the situation in traditional sports, where different cultures prefer different

sport disciplines” (Wagner, 2006, p. 3).

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 9

Game genres and disciplines

Esports genres and disciplines differ in many respects, as they are characterised by individual

subject matter, gameplay, tone, publishers and communities. Esports genres may be considered

classes of games, such as shooters, strategy and sport simulations, and disciplines (=games), such

as Formula 1 or Need for Speed within racing. Each genre again has a number of sub-genres, such

as racing for the genre of sport simulations.

According to Taylor (2012, p. 165), the categorisation of “esports is not based on a single sport.

There are games that come and go, you can base it on genres of games”, while each genre is

governed by different rules and communities. Fans in Western core markets followed between two

and three genres and around five individual games in Pike & Master (2017). The main genres and

disciplines are depicted in Figure 1.

The key figures for the individual games are not stable for long, since rapid evolution,

destruction and up-and-down development for games exists due to fast technological development.

Game titles influence each other, especially if they have similar gameplay. In other words, the

publication of a new game title in an existing genre may have adverse effects on incumbent titles

in the same genre. The most popular disciplines, or game titles, are measured in terms of

participation, prize pool, and spectator interaction and can be classified into so-called tiers. The

three dominant titles, League of Legends, Defense of the Ancient II, and Counter Strike: Global

Offensive, all belong to tier 1, which is characterised by more than 8 million monthly active users,

an annual prize pool exceeding 5 million US Dollars and more than 20 million monthly hours

watched (Hana, 2017). Generally speaking, sport-themed games represent only a small fraction of

the overall esports industry in terms of players and viewership, but they are more compatible with
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 10

the broader society, as their similarity with physical sports simplifies an understanding of the

gameplay.

Figure 1 Major esports genres, sub-genres and disciplines (adapted from Hilgers, 2020)

While genre-specific publications are urgently needed to advance the field of esports,

Rogers (2019), for example, has dedicated an entire section in his book to this topic, shedding light

on sports video games, the Formula 1 esports series and Counter Strike. The sport-themed genre

seems an intuitive fit for many sport organisations, particularly when they consider getting into

esports. Strategically and theoretically speaking, however, it may be worthwhile observing how
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 11

traditional sporting organisations are diversifying and venturing into more distanced genres and

markets, a good example of which is the move of Schalke 04, a traditional German soccer club,

into the esports discipline League of Legends, which belongs to a sub-genre of strategy games

called Multiplayer Online Battle Arena, or MOBA (Schmidt & Holzmayer, 2018). Such moves

constitute initiatives of incremental and radical change, to retain Ratten’s (2019) notion of sports

entrepreneurship introduced earlier.

To sum up, the esports industry is made up of distinct genres, sub-genres and disciplines,

with different degrees of institutionalisation and acceptance in society (Abanazir, 2019). However,

the full esports ecosystem is even more complex and requires a separate discussion of the central

stakeholders.

Ecosystem and stakeholders

Esports infrastructure lacks transparency and simplicity because the variety of distinct

competitions within each discipline and the overlapping activities of organisations involved in the

gaming industry impede a comprehensible and logical tournament structure (Funk et al., 2018).

The publishers represent a core stakeholder of the industry; through developing, designing,

distributing and marketing video games, they are the origin of all esports-related content. Some

game developers (e.g. Riot Games or Valve) even organise their own esports competitions,

produce coverage, and commercialise rights. Furthermore, they license their products and sell

these rights to external tournaments, leagues, and event organisers, like the Electronic Sports

League, which run competitions and therefore act as cornerstones of the tournament system. These

companies are fundamentally involved in the competition environment through fostering regulated

tournament structures and delivering esports content for broadcasters and media platforms. The
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 12

broadcasters (e.g. Twitch, Mixer, ESPN or YouTube Gaming) buy media rights, stream live

coverage, and display esports events or additional gaming related content, often without requiring

a subscription fee.

Teams and players provide the major reasons why people follow esports – especially for

their emotional core, star appeal, and gaming skills. Typical teams consist of multiple squads

competing under a unified brand in diverse disciplines from distinct genres. For example, the

German team SK Gaming has around 30 players in the disciplines League of Legends, FIFA,

Hearthstone & Smite, to name a few (SK Gaming, 2019). The key personnel for each team are the

players, since they are pivotal for competitive success and the generation of viewership in

streaming sessions. A special form of gamers are influencers, who own a big fan base on their

social channels due to their talents at entertaining, in addition to their gaming skill. Sponsors and

advertisers are the central drivers of monetisation and hence professionalisation of the scene, since

they provide 82 % of the industry’s revenue (Pannekeet, 2019). Advertising companies are often

distinguished by their status as endemic or non-endemic nature (Fullerton & Merz, 2008).

Technology companies (e.g. Intel) were considered non-endemic for traditional sport, yet are

considered endemic for esports, as they are contributing to the performance of esports athletes,

thus presenting an opportunity for technology firms to become naturally associated with gaming

and esports, something that was not possible in the past. Fans follow individual players, teams,

events or games via broadcasters and are exposed to advertisements for merchandise, online

subscriptions, tickets etc. The followers are highly engaged in online settings and take part in

dialogues with other stakeholders due to esports’ interactive character. Agencies and start-ups

provide specific expertise in various dimensions, such as content creation or data tracking, and

therefore fill knowledge gaps in organisations. For a deeper comprehension and a more
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 13

sophisticated overview, we recommend the Catalyst stakeholder analysis (Catalyst Sport, 2017).

Although it may be costly in terms of time and effort to fully comprehend the complex and growing

esports ecosystem, prior research in the sport domain has shown that identifying more relevant

stakeholders – both nationally and internationally – increases firm performance (Yu et al., 2015).

This can only be achieved through a careful screening of the ecosystem.

Esports in the context of digital marketing

It is telling that in a recent special issue on contemporary issues in sport marketing, the editorial

starts with a reference to the “blooming esport industry” (Manoli, 2018, p. 1), yet the special issue

does not include a single paper on it. Even digital marketing is represented by just one article on

digital fan engagement via social media (Vale & Fernandes, 2018). Strikingly, there is a natural

connection between esports and digital marketing. The digital nature of esports implies that many

athletes are accustomed to the use of online tools – and so is the audience. On the other hand, the

way esports content is created and consumed – also by a non-professional gaming community –

can fruitfully be leveraged by digital marketers and complements many of today’s online

marketing activities. Moreover, traditional sporting organisations generally struggle to attract

younger audiences, which esports manages to do well. Overall, there is significant potential for

sport marketers and researchers to dive into and connect to the growing esports industry. As the

future of marketing is digital (Busca & Bertrandias, 2020; Kannan & Li, 2017), so is the future of

sport marketing.

The evolution of new media on the internet has reduced the effectiveness of traditional

marketing, since nowadays the “outreach to marketers and other sources of information is much

more likely to shape [consumers’] ensuing choices than marketers’ push to persuade them”
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 14

(Edelman, 2010, S. 62). Thus, marketers need to set more focus on driving advocacy by investing

in sales enablement and creation as well as management of content in new touchpoints, rather than

spending capital mainly on paid media. In this context, the term digital inbound marketing plays a

critical role, as it “represents the process of reaching and converting qualified consumers by

creating and pursuing organic tactics in online settings” (Opreana & Vinerean, 2015, p. 30), based

on practices such as social media marketing or search engine marketing. The method overcomes

boundaries of traditional marketing by enabling novel opportunities to build sustainable and

valuable relationships with consumers. In the sport management literature, a number of studies

have used the relationship marketing paradigm to investigate online interactions to enhance the

relationships between clubs and fans (e.g. Abeza et al., 2013, 2017a, 2017b, 2017c). Most of this

relationship-building happens through the distribution of tailored content to fans and personal

exchanges with them, thus through content marketing. A key objective of sport marketers is to

increase fan engagement on social media (Agrawal et al., 2018; Vale & Fernandes, 2018) and the

identification of consumer interests is a central element in this process, allowing companies to

create high-quality customised content tailored to the desired audience. Unfiltered user sentiments

or personal information about their interests enable content

creation relative to user interests and, in the best case, transform users into online brand advocates

who naturally create and share content, and connect to the brand (Opreana & Vinerean, 2015).

Returning to the results of the Nielsen executive survey (Lovett, 2018) mentioned earlier, “content

is king” and probably the most important element of digital inbound marketing.

Content marketing is defined as “a strategic marketing approach focused on creating and

distributing valuable, relevant and consistent content to attract and maintain a clearly defined

audience and, ultimately, to result in a profitable action of the client for the business” (Content
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 15

Marketing Institute, 2015). In this manner, organisations can increase brand awareness and

sympathy without intrusively advertising products or services. Pivotal aspects that influence the

choice of content topics are marketing objectives, target audience, business environment, and

corporate values (Patrutiu-Baltes, 2016). However, people “are bombarded with so much content

these days (…) that [they] simply do not have time for bland, meaningless, corporate marketing-

agency nonsense” (Jones, 2018). Thus, the selection of relevant content and its appropriate

communication are critical to consider. A best practice example of implementing content

marketing is the company Red Bull, which is shaping the brand perception far beyond its core

product of energy drinks by representing the company’s values via relevant topics for its young

target group, such as extreme sports, music festivals or esports (Kunz et al., 2016).

Esports clearly symbolises an interesting content platform by providing a lucrative

audience, which is highly interactive and engaged in the online environment (Eberhardt, 2018).

The global fan base is estimated to encompass 454 million people in 2019, with rising future

potential. Awareness and audience figures are increasing particularly in emerging markets due to

progress in IT infrastructure and urbanisation. Furthermore, increasing media exposure of esports

as mainstream entertainment, word-of-mouth stories, and the influx of tech-savvy young

generations will further drive audience growth (Pannekeet, 2019). Another market study finds the

target group to be largely male, young, well educated, and affluent (Buckle & Mander, 2018).

Thus, this audience represents a highly relevant target group for marketers, as gamers are

increasingly difficult to reach because their media usage diverges dramatically from traditional

communication channels, such as television or radio. “For many businesses in media and

entertainment, esports offers a way to reach a demographic that’s been increasingly beyond their

grasp” (Arkenberg et al., 2018, p. 3). A further indicator for the continuing success story of esports
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 16

is the increasing interest of the broader society, as every third esports fan in core markets of the

Western gaming culture became interested in the year 2017 (Lovett, 2018).

When considering online communication and content creation in the gaming environment,

the focus lies on the internet presences of stakeholders. Websites intend to inform and transmit

individual information about league, event, team and player operations, and performances. Most

stakeholders position themselves on social media, such as Instagram or Twitter, in order to inform

followers about recent developments, for marketing activities, or solely to entertain fans with

exciting content. Additionally, streaming has become an integral carrier of media content and live

interaction, resulting in its “significant role in esports’ exponential growth as a new form of

entertainment” (Brathwaite, 2018). Not only do the operators of major events use streaming to

broadcast their events, but also an increasing number of casual gamers streams private gaming

sessions. Thus, content platforms, such as Twitch and YouTube are fundamentally important for

marketing delivery in the esports industry. At this point, it is important to note that non-official

esports content represents by far the largest amount of gaming consumption (Pannekeet, 2019).

However, this fact represents a huge opportunity for sport marketers, as casual gamers may be

converted into esports fans and, finally, into esports athletes. Ultimately, extraordinary visitor

numbers at esports events create an attractive offline marketing channel as well (Jenny et al., 2018).

Esports offer not only a strongly involved audience but also novel opportunities for

marketing communication and advertising appearances. However, despite the recognition of

esports as an entertainment business and a growing sponsoring arena, advertising companies and

traditional sport clubs lack internal expertise to efficiently leverage the benefits offered by each

esports genre, discipline, or event.

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 17

Methodology

Interview process

The method we chose for the empirical investigation is the qualitative expert interview, which

measures and examines the world of specialists with shared knowledge and thus enables the

collection of specific data (Gläser & Laudel, 2010). We developed semistructured interviews,

which are characterised by prepared, consistent and systematic questioning derived from key

research themes, regularly interjected with individually tailored questions in order to leverage

more detailed and sophisticated information concerning individual processes in the interview

partner’s business environment (Alvesson, 2003). Understanding the knowledge of interior and

exterior reality is critical to our research topic. Owing the distinct organisations and interviewee

positions, some questions thus had to be individually constructed for each interview.

The interview guide for the interviews consists of six thematic sections, which contains

similar questions in order to enable comparisons about a specific research area. The first section

examines esports’ impact on a brand and discussed main objectives of a potential market entry into

the esports industry. The second section deals with advertising mediums of each stakeholder group

and addressed relevant communication channels. The third section is about developing and

implementing authentic marketing communication. The fourth section examines prevailing

measurement methods for determining the success of the chosen marketing approach. The fifth

section covers the industry’s central risks, with the objective of determining the most important

evaluation approaches and challenges. The last section deals with the industry’s future perspective

in order to identify esports’ potential future development.

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 18

Expert selection

The selection of appropriate interview partners is the most important element in conducting

qualitative research interviews. To justify the selection of interview partners, it is necessary to

define what constitutes an expert. Gläser & Laudel (2010) emphasise the specific role of the

interviewee as a source of specialist knowledge on the factual circumstances of the research topic.

Therefore, employees of organisations involved in the esports environment were consulted in order

to answer key questions concerning the research topics. The selection reflects different

stakeholders in the market in order to allow for triangulation and validation of results (Denzin,

1978). The interviewees organisations were selected based on their role as a sponsor, sport club,

or consulting agency in Germany, representing varied views on the topic from a marketing

perspective. Sport clubs were selected in basketball, soccer, and esports. Sponsoring companies

were determined by their status as endemic or non-endemic company (Fullerton & Merz, 2008)

and integration form, and agencies were selected regarding their field of consulting. Furthermore,

the selection of appropriate experts within the organisation was aligned with the paper’s core topic

of marketing. The network of the authors served as a starting point; a snowball approach was taken

as the interviews were conducted in order to identify further candidates. The final interview

partners are listed in Table 1, including their positions and organisations. The interviews were

conducted between 28 September 2018 and 25 January 2019 and lasted between 40 and 50 minutes.

The conversations were conducted by telephone, were digitally recorded and transcribed

afterwards.
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 19

Table 1 Overview of interview partners

Data Analysis

The evaluation procedure is based on Gläser & Laudel’s (2010) approach of qualitative content

analysis, which generates a structured account of information by summarising the relevant

empirical details from the conversations. Qualitative content analysis treats the text to be evaluated

as material that contains the data and follows the individual steps of extraction, preparation, and

evaluation of the data. The extraction of the information was conducted by using the software
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 20

MAXQDA 11 (Silver & Lewins, 2014), which provides options to create and manage a category

system with codes and sub-codes. The conception of a closed system of categories is an essential

element in order to identify facts and causal mechanisms. Based on the interview guide, we

designed six different codes with multiple sub-codes in order to acquire meaningful information.

The interviews were analysed and coded, and we assigned specific text passages to the related

thematic categories. Extraction of information from interview texts and their allocation to

designated categories goes along with interpretation and, therefore, overlapping expressions were

included in the respective categories (Gläser & Laudel, 2010). The next step of preparation

included the ordering of scattered information, removal of redundant expressions, and grammatical

as well as linguistic adjustments, during which the central objective is the optimisation of data

quality in order to ensure that the information base resulting from the extraction process contains

all information relevant for answering the research questions. The main objective of the evaluation

is providing meaningful expressions and answers to the empirical questions, and, therefore, the six

themes were pivotal for the structure of the evaluation. A search grid in shape of a category system

was derived from these research areas and preliminary theoretical considerations. The results of

the data analysis delivered the required information in order to present and discuss essential aspects

concerning the six research themes.

Findings

Objectives of an esports engagement

“Esports is not a panacea for every problem in the communication of a company” (Interviewee 7)

but “the next step to reach the coming young generations” (Interviewee 3). All interviewees

mentioned the utilisation of esports as a communication tool to reach a young target group. As
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 21

Interviewee 4 put it, “[the] approach was to dock our marketing communication via sponsoring,

(…) that means we built a whole youth campaign around this sponsorship”. Involvement in the

industry enables the possibility to create a new brand image in a novel and rapidly growing

environment in order to capture new audiences of fans.

The reasons and objectives for starting an esports engagement varied between the

interviewees, but are all related to the attractive demography of the target group within the industry.

The esports audience is a heterogeneous group characterised by different game attractions, but also

mainly male, between 15 years old and 35 years old, well educated, affluent and thus “has

everything you want as a sponsor” (Interviewee 1). They are in general grateful to new sponsors,

as they are aware that these companies shape their passion and pave the way for esports’ future

development, professionalisation and recognition (Interviewee 9). Furthermore, the experts’

assessments point out that it can be assumed that esports fans are technology savvy, highly active

in online settings, and therefore attuned to digital marketing (Interviewee 3).

Although the specific objectives for the target audience differ among the stakeholders, they

can be grouped into three overarching goals: increasing brand awareness, image and sympathy.

Non-endemic sponsors aim for the ultimate goal of increasing sales, whereas employer branding

can be the “main mission and vision behind investment in esports” for endemic sponsors

(Interviewee 5). Increasing customer loyalty was stated as a goal by multiple interviewees, and

winning new fans for the core product is a central aspect for traditional sport clubs.

Branded content is a keyword and an opportunity for companies that are not renowned for

innovative communication strategies or exciting products, as it enables a way “to make the brand

shine in a completely different light” (Interviewee 7). Furthermore, esports was viewed as an
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 22

attractive marketing environment, because it is not yet a cultivated field and opens great

opportunity for organisations to co-design an industry (Interviewee 5).

Choosing advertising media and communication channels

“The industry is an illustration of classical mechanisms in sport in regard to marketing,

which means that the monetisation possibilities are similar” as the common revenue streams

include the sale of sponsoring rights, tickets, hospitality and ecommerce items (Interviewee 2).

The major marketing media are generally characterised by one of the three cornerstones: branding

space on jerseys, perimeters or online slots, content creation plus distribution, and

advertising/licensing rights (Interviewee 9).

Each stakeholder owns individual rights and can offer different marketing packages that

define the potential advertising medium. Teams and players offer brand exposure via classic logo

placement on their jersey and online presences, and integration of promotional content in

streaming sessions. Other ways to deliver marketing measures include utilising players as

testimonials, advertising rights with the team or player’s brand logo, product integration of

periphery partners, and production of content or videos (Interviewee 9).

Event organisers and leagues offer name placement, perimeter advertising, exclusive

optional rights packages, and showcasing of brands around esports competitions. Sponsors receive

“preservation of branding space at events, e.g. stage branding or in the entrance area, which is

provided exclusively to the main sponsor. Further marketing areas are created on the online

platforms”, whereas especially the digital media exposure on streaming platforms generate high

reach and awareness (Interviewee 4). The inclusion of video ads, brand staging and in-game

banners provide overall presence during the tournaments and is therefore highly valuable for
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 23

interested sponsors. Furthermore, the inclusion of on-site activities delivers branding space, booth

integration and further activation options to get in touch with visitors of events and competitions.

The lucrative marketing opportunity of in-game advertisement is even more interesting

when sponsoring a publisher. This innovative advertisement approach lets “sponsors be

omnipresent in the game” and is extremely interesting due to permanent brand or logo presence

by marking weapons, buildings, shirts of characters or other perimeters in games, which are played

by emotionally involved customers (Interviewee 2). These marketing areas can either be filled with

permanent advertising or equipped with material concerning customer information, like

geolocation, based on the IP-address of the user. Additional marketing media are similar to those

available to event organisers and include dedicated branding space on-site at events and online

streams (Interviewee 2).

Interviewee 5 explained that sponsoring a broadcaster offers completely different

opportunities for brands to improve the viewing experience due to the broadcaster’s interactive

characteristics and high frequency of visitors. Broadcaster sponsoring encompasses the allocation

of screen space, influencers or even entire channels, since these platforms offer slots in streams

that do not belong to the original content producer.

All interviewees emphasised the importance of digital marketing due to the extensive

online user base, as “it is mainly the digital channels the target audience uses” (Interviewee 2). The

creation of good digital marketing is therefore necessary for a successful esports integration,

because “the more creative your content, the more reach you get, the cooler gets your brand image

and the more interesting you become for potential partners, players and fans” (Interviewee 7).

The most important communication channels in the industry are the streaming platforms

Twitch, YouTube Gaming and Mixer, since they “broadcast the games, competitions and highlights”
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 24

(Interviewee 2). Besides these online platforms, linear TV channels are constantly increasing their

investment in esports media rights and enable content delivery to a broader mass audience. For

classic social network applications, “Instagram and Twitter are the cornerstones without which

nothing really works” (Interviewee 9). However, “interacting with a brand on Twitter is difficult,

because it is more of a text medium” (Interviewee 7); that’s why in terms of interaction rate,

especially Instagram and TikTok work extremely well, due to more creative options to develop

exciting marketing campaigns. However, it is of utmost importance to consider that the reach,

conversion and impact of the channel depends on the discipline – e.g. FIFA 20 works very well on

YouTube Gaming, and Twitch is an essential platform for core

esports titles (Interviewee 7).

Design and implementation of marketing communication

In general, it is not necessarily required to be the fanciest brand or most successful team in order

to produce far-reaching marketing, as “it is maybe the funniest team that has the hottest content on

social media and gains the broadest reach” (Interviewee 1). Marketing in esports “is not about

achieving a presence solely for the sake of presence, but rather of actually offering authentic added

value for the community” (Interviewee 5). Generating added value requires designing marketing

activities based on the target audiences’ wants and needs, as esports’ individual game communities

are characterised by distinct follower interests and affiliations (Interviewee 9). Furthermore, the

industry’s digital environment enables the development of an extremely individual customer

approach due to an abundance of customer data (Interviewee 1). Therefore, the importance of

individually tailored and target-group specific design and implementation of marketing activities

was highlighted by the experts.

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 25

The independent implementation of marketing communication is visible in the individual

approaches of the interviewees’ organisations, which created gaming-related channels and

tournaments or produced videos and tools besides the common logo and content utilisation partners

in order to communicate and interact with their desired audience. Concerning channel creation,

one organisation built a YouTube channel “not only to reach esports fans, but also […] mainstream

gamers by broadcasting a regular series about recent happenings in the gaming world”

(Interviewee 6). The interviewees mentioned the importance of collaborative creation and

production of informational and entertaining videos. Companies can produce videos in order to

advertise products or employ gamification elements, e.g. “athletes present a few products (…) and

try to go in the direction of consulting” in order to emphasise the organisation’s esports affiliation

and expertise in selling technological devices relevant for the gaming industry (Interviewee 6).

“Traditional sport clubs focus on interfaces with the professional sport team, since a joint activation

offers great chances to produce cool content” (Interviewee 7). The videos produced can be digitally

displayed on various platforms and offer authentic and natural storytelling by integrating partners

in the spots.

Thus, natural content creation and authentic storytelling by partners, i.e. players, teams,

publishers or event organisers, was stated as extremely valuable, because it proves and emphasises

the gaming affinity of the organisation. For endemic companies, it is beneficial to stage the gaming

team with everything associated with PCs and gaming, and to disseminate that content via the web

(Interviewee 6). The description of the generated added value from a partner and authentic brand

integration within sponsorships “is super valuable, because the fan sees that we have done

something here – namely cool analyses in DOTA II” (Interviewee 5). The communication of

marketing content via partner platforms is essential, because “in most cases the authenticity, weight
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 26

and reach come through the partner channels” (Interviewee 5). Traditional sport clubs rely on their

esports athletes concerning their gaming communication, because the players have more

subscriptions than the club and generate high reach by linking and sharing their content

(Interviewee 8). In general, “esports does not get much traction in mass media, so consumers are

going to influencers for updates and information” (Henricks, 2018).

The interviewees’ assertions furthermore highlight the importance of considering basic

elements in order to conceptualise successful marketing campaigns. First, it is recommended to

use pictures and videos rather than text, because “the mix of moving images and esports works

extremely well” (Interviewee 7). It is also essential to adapt the content to the language and tone

of the community (e.g. special attack – “ulti”). Each esports discipline has individual game-

specific memes or inside jokes that have become intrinsic to the community. Through authentic

and humorous implementation of these references, brands can intensify their communication

message and create an enduring connection to the community.

Measurement of success

According to the experts’ statements, general measurement methods are the sale of digital rights,

tracking of digital media exposure, and sentiments in online settings, particularly on social media

– with the help of specific tools, which provide metrics such as reach, interaction or engagement

rates. An easy way to measure digital communication is the sale of digital rights, such as online

perimeters and slots, or licenses that are directly monetised (Interviewee 2). Additionally, the

impact of esports on the sale of articles in the ecommerce area can be measured by monitoring

“how many products were sold via the gaming link” (Interviewee 6). In order to track brand

exposure in digital media, some experts mentioned using the tools and calculation procedure
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 27

provided by Newzoo & Nielsen, which are analysing performance-data metrics, such as channel

followers or average concurrent viewers across the essential esports platforms. It provides “a

holistic view of how players and fans are consuming and engaging with streaming content” (Cohen,

2018). Monitoring community pages and the social news aggregator Reddit is essential, “because

you get the unfiltered truth about the perception of organisations in the corresponding target group”

(Interviewee 5). Furthermore, some organisations run market research in order to evaluate the

development of their brand image and the “annual development of target group, age, gender etc.”

(Interviewee 6). Interviewee 5 predicted that metrics will certainly exist at some point in the future

to measure the impact of esports commitment on the recruiting success, implying that employer

branding, i.e. marketing of the employer to potential employees, is another central issue of an

esports engagement.

Prevailing risks

If a marketing measure is seen as faked, it might cause image problems within the community,

which can grow to a viral shit storm. Therefore, multiple experts emphasised that classic marketing

activities of “clumsy product and logo placement simply do not work in esports” particularly for

non-endemic partners (Interviewee 6). It symbolises the risk of losing authenticity and credibility,

which is highly important to consider in order to build a valuable relationship with the community.

Non-endemic brands “should be careful when trying to place a product that is not necessarily

suitable” (Interviewee 4) to the target group, as their services do not naturally overlap with interest

fields of esports enthusiasts. In contrast, the product placement of peripheral partners can be

integrated authentically, as they equip partners with necessary gear that can be naturally presented
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 28

in tournaments and live streams, generating further added value for the gaming community

(Interviewee 9).

A conclusion of the interviewees’ statements shows that the extremely dynamic

environment causes major risks for organisations. For example, the community interacts via online

channels and feedback is spreading rapidly, which “can develop a dynamic that you cannot stop

afterwards” (Interviewee 4). Another issue with the exorbitant pace within the industry is the rising

entry of new brands, which brings the necessity for sponsors to “secure and maintain certain

exclusive rights in order to remain visible or to select areas that can be used independently and

intelligently” (Interviewee 4). Furthermore, the rapid release of new games also causes rapidly

changing numbers of active users and spectators, since new games (especially the ones in the same

genre) compete for the attention of professional athletes and leisure gamers. For example, “Fortnite

has shot up incredibly fast [and now] Call of Duty Black Ops has added a Battle Royal mode (…)

or Pokemon GO had 50 million users in Germany within 19 days and is dead now” (Interviewee

1).

The interviewees furthermore mentioned the opaque tournament structure, as the industry

is a “newly emerging market that is still very unsorted and constantly produces new competition

formats” (Interviewee 8). This leads to problems in understanding the structure and significance

of different tournaments and impedes appropriate marketing communication of the esports

involvement. A further risk mentioned is the reliance on a successful competitive performance of

a sponsored team or player (Interviewee 4).

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 29

Future perspective

The interviewees identified technological innovation, acceptance in societies, and creation of

transparent competition infrastructure as major issues influencing the future of esports. Foremost,

the global spreading of internet-enabled devices and faster internet connections, particularly in

emerging and developing countries, implies that the mere dissemination of games will lead to an

enormous increase in user numbers, viewership and revenue, and opens huge unexploited potential

(Interviewee 9).

Technological development is exponential and will enable opportunities to experience

esports increasingly interactively (Interviewee 3). Furthermore, digital innovation will optimise

technologies that enhance the experience of esports, whereas artificial intelligence in particular

“will help to raise the games in the esports area to entirely different levels” (Interviewee 7). Virtual

and augmented reality will constantly enhance the connection with traditional sport by interlacing

virtual games with physical elements, further enabling possibilities to include disabled people in

professional tournaments, for example (Interviewee 7). However, most experts think that the “core

of esports will stay the same as gamers continue to sit in front of computers (…) because it is the

raw form of esports. The only field with extreme potential in the short run is mobile gaming”

(Interviewee 9). The evolution of mobile gaming will shape the industry, since “especially in

developing countries, such as China, Indonesia and India, the percentage of mobile usage is much

higher compared to PC” (Interviewee 2).

The general acceptance of gaming in the wider society also plays a decisive role for

esports’ future, as it is currently still associated with violence glorification, nerds, and laziness.

These central factors represent the limited mainstream consumption and even influence the

strategy of high-profile esports teams, which adjust their portfolios based on sponsor demands
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 30

(Interviewee 9). According to most experts, this image will change in the next decade due to

demographic change. “Clearly others are moving up, also in leading positions, who grew up with

computer games and have a completely different point of view on gaming” (Interviewee 4).

In order to create a broader acceptance for esports, “fixed transparent league and

competition formations would help enormously” (Interviewee 2). The launch of various leagues

in collaboration with traditional sport associations, such as FIFA or DFL, portends the development

of comprehensible competition structures in the coming years. Additionally, publishers

continuously improve their esports operations – for instance, Riot Game’s introduction of a new

League of Legends European Championship format contains a big step forward in terms of

professionalisation (Interviewee 9). According to the experts’ statements, approaches and progress

of proficiency in the industry are visible, as “everything is becoming much more professional and

structured (…), not only in teams, but also in leagues and associations” (Interviewee 9). All

interviewees mentioned the will to “increase investments in terms of financial, resource-related or

physiological aspects” (Interviewee 5).

However, the general future of esports is difficult to predict, as the industry is still in its

infancy. “The topic is extremely interesting but has just emerged in the last years. You do not know

how much substance is behind it” (Interviewee 1). One expert even predicts that due to exorbitant

sums and unsustainable business models, a bubble is rising that will burst at any point, as investors

will not receive their expected return in many cases (Interviewee 9). Nevertheless, the interviewees

are convinced that esports will constantly grow in the long-term, as the number of players,

spectators, and events is rising everyday due to the major developments of digital dissemination,

demographic change, and technological innovation.

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 31

Discussion

In general, the interviewed experts viewed esports as a field with great opportunity to reach a

young target group, which is increasingly tough to reach, in a constantly growing environment.

The industry offers a wide range of possibilities for organisations to capture a young, technology

savvy audience and to increase brand awareness, sympathy and loyalty within this target group.

Esports offers advantages over other marketing channels, because it offers opportunities for

staging and showcasing marketing activities due to esports’ strong digital presence and the high

interactivity of the audience. Organisations can also communicate their esports involvement offline

by integrating information booths, gaming worlds, virtual or augmented reality areas or similar

concepts in conventions or tournaments.

However, esports is not a feathered nest to jump into by solely integrating a logo or product,

as its different communities have a keen intuition for faked interest. Therefore, it is essential to

consider game, player, team or league-specific references and to emphasise the design and

implementation of individualised marketing communications, particularly regarding storytelling

and content in each sponsoring opportunity. An authentic, natural implementation is critical,

making it essential to set a clear definition of the objective and to synchronise it fully with the

available opportunities. Thus, it does not make sense for every brand to get involved, but if the

right brands activate esports marketing with a tailor-made approach, it has great potential.

Measuring digital media exposure and sentiments within social media are the cornerstones for

evaluating an esports campaign, while additional metrics are determined by the objectives. The

dynamic environment and complex competition structure were named as the biggest prevailing

risks. This is in line with the literature, which highlights the opaque league structure as an

impediment for future development of the field (Abanazir, 2019; Funk et al., 2018). However,
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 32

most genres and disciplines recently started to establish transparent tournament structures with

help of event organisers, professional agencies and official associations (e.g. FIFA). In general, the

experts classified the risks as relatively low, as the financial volume at stake is scalable and still

relatively small compared to other engagement options. Thus, the risks should not be considered

a major problem but rather as an opportunity for shaping the market, developing professional

infrastructure, and generating added value for the whole scene. Esports contains many assets that

promise a successful future for marketing approaches due to constantly increasing digital

dissemination at a global level. The strong online engagement of the target audience generates an

abundance of customer data, which can be leveraged for marketing purposes. Furthermore,

acceptance in the broader society is likely to establish a natural perspective on gaming, since the

average spectator will get older due to generational change. These macro-level trends are going to

intensify over the course of time and might represent the motor behind the growth of esports. In

addition, a sector expected to play a significant role in the near future is mobile gaming. By contrast,

other forms of digital innovation, such as virtual reality or augmented reality, will need to

proliferate in the broader society in order to become more relevant for esports.

An abundance of different video games exists for all kinds of devices, whereas most top-

grossing games have competitions at the core of their game play – even on mobile devices. The

differentiation between console, PC and mobile gaming is important to consider, because they

represent different platforms on which esports activities take place (Hilgers, 2020). Several

interviewees stated that the PC is going to stay at the core of esports. Not all genres and disciplines

are esports-relevant, but the number is likely to rise, since publishers keep adding new titles with

competitive elements. The publishers and event organisers play a critical and powerful role in the

environment, as they own and develop every title, which is a central difference to traditional sports.
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 33

Thus, it is not possible to generalise the term esports; it has to be analysed in a highly differentiated

manner, beginning with categorising games in distinct genres with similar game play (Hilgers,

2020).

Overall, the experts’ assessments are to a large extent in-line with the paper’s initial

assertions, since the specialists perceived the industry as a constantly growing entertainment

business with high potential to reach young generations. The objectives and implementation

approaches mentioned by these esports experts are in congruence with the prevailing literature and

market research. Contradictions between the experts’ statements arose on the topics of tournament

structure and partly on future perspectives. Different opinions concerning tournament structure can

be attributed to individual involvement in distinct disciplines. Concerning future development, the

impact of increasingly interactive gaming possibilities drew different opinions, since most

interviewees stated that virtual reality and augmented reality are innovations with great potential,

whereas others indicated that the core of esports will stay the same, as gamers will continue to

compete against each other in front of a PC.

Implications, limitations, and future research

Theoretical contributions

Given the relative novelty of the esports domain, there is no established theory of esports. However,

much research in management has started with an interest in specific phenomena (von Krogh et

al., 2012). This is particularly true for phenomena related to technology. Applying the framework

provided by von Krogh et al. (2012), we may characterise the current phase of research on esports

as embryonic yet growing, while the nature of most contributions is to distinguish, as witnessed in

the discussion around whether esports should be considered sports, and explore, a category which
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 34

the present paper falls into. A key contribution of our study is the depiction of esports’ value for

sport marketers, with specific focus on who – i.e. sponsors and sport clubs – can profit from an

esports engagement and how – i.e. design and implementation – the marketing potential can be

leveraged. Furthermore, the results give insight into the impact esports may have on brands and

illustrate the distinct advertising media of each stakeholder group as well as relevant

communication channels within the industry. In writing this paper, we respond to a call by

Hallmann & Giel (2018, p.18) who state that the topic of esports “should be attended by marketers.

Yet, the question arises how it should be attended”. With this paper, we shed light on this question

and provide qualitative evidence from nine German industry experts that represent different

stakeholder groups, namely clubs, sponsors, and agencies. Integrating esports and digital

marketing is an endeavour that – although sensible and called for by several researchers – has not

been taken serious by sport management or sport marketing scholars. Our paper is the first to

provide a multi-stakeholder view of digital marketing in the domain of esports. Our insights may

prove to be first steps towards building a more comprehensive theory of esports (Doherty, 2013;

Cunningham et al., 2018).

Managerial implications

As a result of the empirical analysis, the following section states critical recommendations on how

to make a commitment in esports a success. The recommendations are derived from the statements

of the experts and have been condensed by the authors. We hope that these managerial

recommendations prove to be useful to novices in the field.

First and foremost, a successful engagement in the industry is built on preparation and

information, as many brands can benefit from esports when the concept is based on clear objectives
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 35

and the right conclusions. The clear definition and synchronisation of objectives with the special

features of esports is of utmost importance, as the objective is pivotal for the selection of

appropriate approaches and has a great impact on how to make an investment a success.

Sport marketers should visit esports events, observe the community and connect with the

right partners by asking fans and experts in order to gather knowledge from their experience. They

should absorb the atmosphere of tournaments and monitor Twitch, Reddit and other social media

in order to get a sense of the community. Furthermore, they should hire in-house expertise or find

partners who can provide extensive expertise within the target community. Ultimately, it is

necessary to carefully analyse objectives and implement an appropriate package that best covers

the characteristics for reaching these goals (e.g. Indian Market – PUBG Mobile).

Following this immersion, sport marketers should join the community and create added

value, since generating authentic content in a campaign paves the way to interacting with the

community. It is recommended to take part in discussions in order to be a knowledgeable and

reliable resource for community members. Interesting and entertaining content is essential,

reputable partners, i.e. event organisers, publishers, star players, influencers or teams, with high

reach may be used for natural storytelling and amplifying the organisation’s gaming affiliation.

Sport marketers should use the right media and a mix of platforms but consider the special

features of each discipline in the online environment (e.g. FIFA – YouTube Gaming). A presence

on social networks and streaming sites is essential to leverage the interactive engagement of the

scene, but that does not mean excluding offline approaches, where they can reach emotionally

involved event spectators.

The number of companies that have recognised the potential of esports is growing rapidly,

and they occupy exclusive spots within the industry. Therefore, interested organisations should not
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 36

wait and start entering the industry. New games and everevolving technological innovations

continuously change the industry and enable new possibilities for first movers. Thus, involved

organisations need to stay up-to-date on recent developments likely to influence the market in

order to avoid out-dated sponsoring entities and to enable the acquisition of exclusive rights within

new disciplines or stakeholders.

Traditional sport clubs should use esports in all facets and not solely try to promote their

core product by participating in the virtual complement of their physical sport. They need to

consider more options based on holistic aspects, such as the main sponsors, business industry,

corporate identity or enhancement of digital expertise. First of all, clubs can win sympathy within

young target groups by creating infrastructure for esports enthusiasts, where they can socially play

and train. Second, sport clubs can reach new, international markets, spectators and sponsors not

interested in traditional sports and create a fresh image separate from the stereotypical history of

the club. Last, an investment will accelerate and emphasise sport marketer’s digital awareness as

they get in touch with companies that are developing the latest technological tools (e.g. 5G in

venue).

Limitations and future research

While we conducted this study, several limitations emerged, which provide avenues for future

research. First, while the interviewees for the study were carefully chosen and represent key

stakeholder groups in the field of sport marketing, we may still not have captured all voices of the

esports ecosystem in Germany. For example, most organisations we interviewed did not use

esports to reach international target groups and do not compete in disciplines beyond their virtual

counterpart. Future studies should attempt to broaden the scale and scope of the participants
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 37

involved, based on meaningful theoretical criteria. Researchers may wish to include esports

organisations which are active on a global scale. As for traditional sport clubs, it would be

insightful to scrutinise cases where the esports engagement goes beyond the club’s virtual

counterpart. An example of this would be the activities of Schalke 04 in the League of Legends

genre, going beyond the implementation of more conventional esports titles, such as FIFA and Pro

Evolution Soccer, which have soccer at their core (Bertschy et al., 2020; Schmidt & Holzmayer,

2018). Finally, it is certainly conceivable to recruit experts from other segments of the esports

ecosystem, e.g. professional athletes, broadcasters and games publishers (Catalyst Sport, 2017).

We would like to highlight that game publishers take a special role here due to their functioning

as providers and owners of a game (i.e. the physical provision) as well as organisers of (franchise)

leagues and rights holders (Funk et al., 2018). These functions hold significant potential for digital

sport marketers, for example when it comes to in-game advertisements (Seo et al., 2018) and using

esports venues as marketing channels (Jenny et al., 2018).

Second, the current body of studies – particularly per genre and discipline – is incomplete.

It was neither intended nor possible to properly illustrate the special features of the distinct esports

genres, disciplines, and communities. During the course of this research, it became clear to us that

local rules and customs are inherently important for the appropriate implementation of marketing

communications and we thus call for detailed analyses of individual genres and disciplines. As

mentioned earlier, we have observed some focus on specific genres in recent publications, notably

part three in the book by Rogers (2019), yet we believe that beyond an understanding of the nature

and functioning of specific genres and how they fit into the overall sport industry, the implications

for marketing and sponsoring have thus far been neglected. For this to change, genre-specific
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 38

marketing analyses are required, a first example of which is provided by Marchenko and

Musabirov (2019).

Third, we have mentioned the use of social media, such as Twitch, Twitter, Instagram and

YouTube, by esports athletes, teams, event organisers and leagues on various occasions in this

paper. Social media networks are used for a variety of marketing-related activities on both

individual, team and organisational levels, e.g. for relationship and brand building (Abeza et al.,

2017a) or product endorsements (Abeza et al., 2017b). Some platforms, such as Twitch, Mixer and

YouTube Gaming, are also used to distribute esports content. We believe there is much room for

cross-fertilisation with sport scholars investigating social media (Abeza et al., 2017c; Abeza et al.,

2018, Agrawal et al., 2018; Corthouts et al., 2018), specifically when it comes to analysing

professional athletes as esports influencers (Grimmer & Clavio, 2019) or running esports

communities (Wagner & Wagner, 2013).

Fourth, we believe that it is important to shed more light on what constitutes the customer

and gaming experience, i.e. to analyse the motivational factors behind player engagement and what

makes esports an enjoyable sporting option for them (Naraine & Wear, 2019). Again, as specified

above, these factors may vary for different types of genres. A sports car racing game may elicit a

different gaming experience (Leng & Pyun, 2018) compared to a non-sport-themed esports genre,

such as League of Legends. Only if digital marketers truly understand this context, will they be

able to integrate marketing and sponsoring messages authentically and effectively in the esports

environment.

Fifth, we call for more research that informs marketers about the ethical dimension of

esports. While it seems obvious that many digital marketing activities are aimed at getting users

hooked, it should be emphasised that gamers and esports athletes may constitute a vulnerable
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 39

population, who is prone to addiction (Bányai et al., 2019; Sweeney et al., 2019). A focus on

safeguarding mechanisms, particularly in view of the young age of many players, seems warranted.

Another ethical issue is how potentially violent games, particularly the genre of first person or ego

shooters, are becoming legitimised through esports and thus find their way into the conventional

sport arena (Young & Strait, 2019). Digital marketers and sponsors take a pivotal role in this

process as they provide resources and co-branding opportunities. The choice to do so

should be well-informed.

Sixth, given the relative novelty of the field, we advocate for more explorative research of

how sport marketers are engaging with esports. Qualitative work (Hoeber & Shaw, 2017), more

generally, and case-based research (Morse & McEvoy, 2014) or netnographic research (Kozinets,

2009; Abeza et al., 2017), more specifically, should be a promising avenue for future esports

research. With help of cases, for example, it is possible to select the case organisations based on

theoretically relevant criteria (e.g. diversification or internationalisation). Case-based research

may also be applied to different esports genres or disciplines. Ultimately, netnographies may

illuminate the way esports influencers are conducting their business. They may also be used for

understanding the local rules and customs within specific esports genres.

Conclusions

Esports is a general term that encompasses the landscape of competitive gaming. Its evolution into

an important entertainment industry with regular presence in the biggest stadiums and executive

boards of global players is extraordinary. The development can mainly be attributed to innovations

in information and communication technologies as well as the loyal fan base of gaming enthusiasts.
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 40

The digital origin of esports goes along with extensive utilisation of online services, which enable

opportunities to interact with a young audience.

The most salient aspect is to understand the existence of multiple distinct segments within

the industry, mostly separated by different game genres and titles. The individual characteristics

and persona archetypes of each community differ; thus, an essential element for brand promotion

is understanding the special features of the target community in order leverage trust and add value

to create sustainable relationships. A clear, objective definition and synchronisation with the

available opportunities is fundamental to identifying the most appropriate sponsoring and

marketing approach.

Building on these findings, the focus must be set on target-group specific design and

implementation of marketing communications. In order to design and implement successful

marketing communications, it is most important to create added value in the form of entertainment

or information. For this purpose, the creation of natural and authentic storytelling and delivery via

appropriate communication channels are critical. Since most operations in esports take place online,

special attention should be paid to video communities and social media. The measurement of

marketing activities is therefore mainly based on the calculation of digital media exposure and the

evaluation of online sentiments, whereas market surveys can track the development of brand

awareness and sympathy.

Some challenges remain: A central problem is the prevailing lack of transparent association

and tournament structure, which impedes uniform competition processes. The professionalisation

of the environment, however, is in full swing, as publishers and event organisers have recently

begun to build clear tournament structures, increasingly in collaboration with official sport
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 41

associations for sport-themed video games. Furthermore, the rising acceptance of the industry’s

establishment as an important sport business enhances support from official authorities.

The macro trends of digital dissemination, technological innovation, and generational

change indicate that some disciplines will increasingly overtake traditional sports in terms of

awareness, revenue, and viewership. The digital natives of generations Y and Z grew up with

digital tools, and we can assume that digital media and interactive entertainment like esports will

be unstoppable, as digital behaviour continues to play a critical role for coming generations. The

global society will establish a more natural perspective on gaming in the course of time, and esports

will consolidate its status, as the utilisation of digital tools is going to increasingly spread out.

Esports is on course to grow into the middle of the society and has the power to inspire and unite

people in the coming decades through its embrace of digital tools and integration of technological

innovation. We may one day reach the third scenario described by Jonasson & Thiborg (2010), i.e.

a future characterised by the hegemony of esports. Whether or not that is desirable will likely

trigger numerous discussions in the years to come.

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 42

References

Abanazir, C. (2019). Institutionalisation in e-sports, Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 13(2), 117–131.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2018.1453538

Abeza, G., O’Reilly, N. & Reid, I. (2013). Relationship marketing and social media in sport,

International Journal of Sport Communication, 6(2), 120–142.

https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.6.2.120

Abeza, G., O’Reilly, N., Seguin, B., & Nzindukiyimana, O. (2017). Social media as a relationship

marketing tool in professional sport: A netnographical exploration. International Journal

of Sport Communication, 10(3), 325-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479517740343

Abeza, G., O’Reilly, N. & Seguin, B. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: contemporary

issues in social media in sport, International Journal of Sport Communication, 11(3),

293–294. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2018-0091

Abeza, G., O’Reilly, N., Seguin, B. & Nzindukiyimana, O. (2017). Social media as a relationship

marketing tool in professional sport: a netnographical exploration, International Journal

of Sport Communication, 10(3), 325–358. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2017-0041

Abeza, G., O’Reilly, N., Séguin, B. & Nzindukiyimana, O. (2017). The world’s highest-paid

athletes, product endorsement, and Twitter, Sport, Business and Management: An

International Journal, 7(3), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-08-2016-0040

Adams, K., Devia-Allen, G. & Moore, M.A. (2019). What Is Esports?, in Rogers, R. (Ed.):

Understanding Esports: An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon, Rowman & Littlefield,

.3–14.

Agrawal, A., Gupta, A. & Yousaf, A. (2018). Like it but do not comment: manipulating the

engagement of sports fans in social media, International Journal of Sport Management and
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 43

Marketing, 18(4), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2018.093358

Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics and localists: a reflexive approach to

interviews in organizational research, The Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 12–33.

https://doi.org/10.2307/30040687

Arkenberg, C., Van Dyke, D., Tengberg, J. & Baltuskonis, N. (2018). ESports Graduates to the

Big Leagues, Deloitte Insights. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10h9fjc.37

Baker, C. (2016, May 25). Steward Brand Recalls First “Spacewar” Video Game Tournament.

Rolling Stone. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/stewart-brand-recalls-

first-spacewar-video-game-tournament-187669/

Bányai, F., Griffiths, M.D., Király, O. & Demetrovics, Z. (2019). The psychology of esports: a

systematic literature review, Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(2), .351–365.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9763-1

Bertschy, M., Mühlbacher, H. & Desbordes, M. (2020). Esports extension of a football brand:

stakeholder co-creation in action?, European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(1), 47–68.

https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2019.1689281

Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A. & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business

strategy: toward a next generation of insights, MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.

https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3

Billings, A. & Hou, J. (2019). The origins of esport: a half century history of “overnight” success,

in Rogers, R. (Ed.): Understanding Esports: An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon,

Rowman & Littlefield, 31–44.

Bogers, M. (2018). Foreword, in Ratten, V. (Ed.): Sports Innovation Management, Routledge,

VIII–IX.
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 44

Bowman, N.D. & Cranmer, G.A. (2019). Can video games be a sport?, in Rogers, R. (Ed.):

Understanding Esports: An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon, Rowman & Littlefield,

15–30.

Brathwaite, B. (2018, August 31). Breaking down the major streaming platforms in eSports. The

Esports observer. https://esportsobserver.com/breakdown-streaming-platforms/

Buckle, C. & Mander, J. (2018). eSports Trends Report 2018: Understanding Who Esport Fans

are and How the Industry is Evolving, Trendstream Limited.

Busca, L. & Bertrandias, L. (2020). A Framework for digital marketing research: investigating

the four cultural eras of digital marketing, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 49. 1–19.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2019.08.002

Catalyst Sports (2017, September 26). Special Edition: The 2017 Esports Ecosystem.

https://meta.catalystsports.com/2017/09/26/577/

Chan, E. (2019, September 12). International Olympic Committee and Intel to host 500,000

$ esports tournament ahead of 2020 Tokyo Olympics. NBC

https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/fusion/international-olympic-committee-and-

intel-host-esports-tournament-ahead-2020-tokyo

Cohen, A. (2018, October 10). Nielsen owned SuperData creates Sponsorship valuation tool for

eSport. Sporttechie https://www.sporttechie.com/nielsen-owned-superdata-creates-

sponsorship-valuation-tool-for-esports/

Content Marketing Institute (2015). What is Content Marketing?

https://contentmarketinginstitute.com/what-is-content-marketing/

Corthouts, J., Denys, A., Thibaut, E. & Scheerder, J. (2018). Like it or not? The differences

between and success factors of sports providers’ use of social networking sites,
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 45

International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 19 (1–2), 56–79.

Doi: 10.1504/IJSMM.2019.097015.

Cunningham, G.B., Fairley, S., Ferkins, L., Kerwin, S., Lock, D., Shaw, S. & Wicker, P. (2018).

eSport: construct specifications and implications for sport management, Sport

Management Review, 21(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2019.097015

Denzin, N.K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods,

McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543

Doherty, A. (2013). Investing in sport management: the value of good theory, Sport Management

Review, 16(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2011.12.006

Eberhardt, H. (2018, July 17). eSport Sponsoring: Fehler, Learnings, Ausblicke. Sponsors.

https://www.sponsors.de/news/magazin/esport-sponsoring-fehler-learnings-ausblicke

Edelman, D.C. (2010). Branding in the digital age, Harvard Business Review, 88(12), 62–69.

ESBD (2018, February 5). Koalitionsvertrag zwischen SPD und CDU/CSU: eSport soll Sport

werden – ESBD begrüßt „Wendepunkt“ in Diskussion um Anerkennung von eSport.

https://esportbund.de/blog/2018/02/07/koalitionsvertrag-zwischen-spd-und-cdu-csu-

esportsoll-sport-werden-esbd-begruesst-wendepunkt-in-diskussion-im-anerkennung-von-

esport/

ESBD (2019, April 18). We need an esports vision for Europe!“ – 12 national federations agree

on establishing a European Esports Federation at EEMB19”.

https://esportbund.de/blog/2019/04/18/we-need-an-esports-vision-for-europe-12-

nationalfederations-agree-on-establishing-a-european-esports-federation-at-eemb19/

ESL (2019, March 27). The world’s largest esports company, and Intel Corporation.

https://about.eslgaming.com/blog/2019/03/esl-and-intel-welcomed-174000-fans-at-
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 46

worldsmost-attended-esports-event-and-most-watched-esl-csgo-tournament-ever/

Esports Charts (2019, October 2). Worlds 2019. https://escharts.com/tournaments/lol/2019-world-

championship

Fullerton, S. & Merz, G.R. (2008). The four domains of sports marketing: a conceptual

framework, Sport Marketing Quarterly, 17, 90–108.

Funk, D.C., Pizzo, A.D. & Baker, B.J. (2018). eSport management: embracing eSport education

and research opportunities, Sport Management Review, 21, 7–13.

Gläser, J. & Laudel, G. (2010). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, 4 ed., Springer

VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.

Graham, B.A. (2017, April 18). eSports to be a medal event ar 2022 Asian Games. The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/apr/18/esports-to-be-medal-sport-at-2022-

asiangames

Grimmer, C.G. & Clavio, G. (2019). Sport pro = Twitter pro? – How soccer stars use Twitter at

the height of their career, International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing,

19(3-4), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2019.099782

Hallmann, K. & Giel, T. (2018). ESports – competitive sports or recreational activity? Sport

Management Review, 21(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.011

Hana, C. (2017, January 17). Jens Hilgers breaks down Game relevance in eSport. The Esports

Observer. https://esportsobserver.com/esports-game-tier-updates-for-2017/

Heere, B. (2018). Embracing the sportification of society: defining e-sports through a polymorphic

view on sport, Sport Management Review, 21(1), 21–24.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.002

Henricks, M. (2018, November 13). eSports marketers embrace influencers. Provoke Media.
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 47

https://www.holmesreport.com/latest/article/esports-marketers-embrace-influencers

Hilgers, J. (2020). Ecosystem eSport: Wie funktioniert die Branche?, Presentation given at the

SPOBIS Conference, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Hoeber, L. & Shaw, S. (2017). Contemporary qualitative research methods in sport management,

Sport Management Review, 20(1), .4–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.11.005

Jenny, S.E., Keiper, M.C., Taylor, B.J., Williams, D.P., Gawrysiak, J., Manning, R.D. & Tutka,

P.M. (2018). eSports venues: a new sport business opportunity, Journal of Applied Sport

Management, 10(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.18666/JASM-2018-V10-I1-8469

Jonasson, K. & Thiborg, J. (2010). Electronic sport and its impact on future sport, Sport in

Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics, 13(2), 287–299.

Jones, D. (2018, October 16). AS Roma and friends: the clubs who are crushing social media.

Bleacher Report. https://www.bleacherreport.com/articles/2800896-as-roma-and-friends-

the-clubs-who-are-crushing-social-media

Kannan, P.K. & Li, H.A. (2017). Digital marketing: a framework, review and research agenda,

International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), .22–45.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006

Kozinets, R.V. (2009). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online, SAGE.

Kunz, R., Elsässer, F. & Santomier, J. (2016). Sport-related branded entertainment: the red bull

phenomenon, Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 6(5), 520–541.

https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-06-2016-0023

Leng, H.K. & Pyun, D.Y. (2018). Development of a scale to measure gamer experiences in sport

video games, International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 18(5), 417–429.

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2018.094348
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 48

Lovett, G. (2018). TOP 5 Global Sports Industry Trends, The Nielsen Company.

Manoli, A.E. (2018). Sport marketing’s past, present and future; an introduction to the special issue

on contemporary issues in sports marketing, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(1), 1–5.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2018.1389492

Marchenko, E. & Musabirov, I. (2019). Media metrics in esports: the case of Dota 2, Extended

Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion

Extended Abstracts, 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341215.3356304

Morse, A.L. & McEvoy, C.D. (2014). Qualitative Research in Sport Management: Case Study as

a Methodological Approach, Social Science Research Network, (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID

2458106). Available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2458106

Naraine, M.L. & Wear, H. (2019). The esports consumer experience, in Rogers, R. (Ed.):

Understanding Esports: An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon, 85–94.

Nielsen (2017, August 17). Nielsen launches new eSport business to help define and quantify value

for the competitive gaming market.

https://www.nielsen.com/eu/en/pressroom/2017/nielsen-launches-new-esports-business-

to-help-define-and-quantify-competitivegaming.html

Opreana, A. & Vinerean, S. (2015). A new development in online marketing: introducing digital

inbound marketing, Expert Journal of Marketing, 3(1), 29–34.

Pannekeet, J. (2019). Free 2019 Global Esports Market Report, Newzoo.

Patrutiu-Baltes, L. (2016). Inbound marketing – the most important digital marketing strategy,

Bulletin of the Transilvanian University of Brasov, 5(9), 61–68.

Pike, N. & Master, S. (2017). The Esports Playbook: Maximising Your Investment Through

Understanding the Fans, The Nielsen Company.

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 49

Pizzo, A.D., Na, S., Baker, B.J., Lee, M.A., Kim, D. & Funk, D.C. (2018). ESport vs. sport: a

comparison of spectator motives, Sport Marketing Quarterly, 27(2), 108–123.

Ratten, V. (2011). Sport-based entrepreneurship: towards a new theory of entrepreneurship and

sport management, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 57–69.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0138-z

Ratten, V. (2019). Introduction: sport technology and innovation, in Ratten, V. (Ed.): Sports

Technology and Innovation: Assessing Cultural and Social Factors, Springer International

Publishing, 1–18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75046-0_1

Reitman, J.G., Anderson-Coto, M.J., Wu, M., Lee, J.S. & Steinkuehler, C. (2019). Esports

research: a literature review, Games and Culture.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019840892

Rogers, D.L. (2016). The Digital Transformation Playbook: Rethink Your Business for the Digital

Age, Columbia University Press.

Rogers, R. (2019). Understanding Esports: An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon, Rowman

& Littlefield.

Schmidt, S. & Holzmayer, F. (2018). FC Schalke 04 eSports – decision making in a changing

ecosystem. The case centre https://www.thecasecentre.org/main/products/

view?&id=154450

Scholz, T.M. (2019). A short history of esports and management, in Scholz, T.M. (Ed.): Esports

is Business: Management in the World of Competitive Gaming, Springer International

Publishing, 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11199-1_2

Seo, Y., Kim, M., Lee, D. & Jung, Y. (2018). Attention to esports advertisement: effects of ad

animation and in-game dynamics on viewers’ visual attention, Behaviour and Information
REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 50

Technology, 37(12), 1194–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1488993

Shaw, A., Drogin Rodgers, E.B., Rodgers, R.P., Wiggins, B.P. (2019). Esport spectator motivation,

in Rogers, R. (Ed.): Understanding Esports: An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon,

Rowman & Littlefield, 73–84.

Silver, C. & Lewins, A. (2014). Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide,

SAGE.

SK Gaming (2019). SK gaming teams. https://www.sk-gaming.com/team

Ströbel, T., Stieler, M. & Stegmann, S. (2020). Digital transformation in sport: the

disruptive potential of digitalization for sport management research, Sport, Business and

Management.

Sweeney, K., Tuttle, M.H. & Berg, M.D. (2019). Esports gambling: market structure and biases,

Games and Culture, 1555412019872389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019872389

Taylor, T.L. (2012). Raising the stakes: eSports and the Professionalization of Computer Gaming,

The MIT Press, Cambridge.

Vale, L. & Fernandes, T. (2018). Social media and sports: driving fan engagement with football

clubs on Facebook, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(1), 37–55.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2017.1359655

von Krogh, G., Rossi-Lamastra, C. & Haefliger, S. (2012). Phenomenon-based research in

management and organisation science: when is it rigorous and does it matter?, Long Range

Planning, 45(4), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.05.001

Wagner, D. & Wagner, H-T. (2013). Online communities and dynamic capabilities: a cross-case

examination of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguration, Proceedings of the 19th Americas

Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, 1–8.

REAPING THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND? 51

Wagner, M.G. (2006). On the scientific relevance of esport, Proceedings of the International

Conference on Internet Computing and Conference on Computer Games Developmen’,

dblp, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 1–4.

Westerman, G., Bonnet, D. and McAfee, A. (2014). Leading Digital: Turning Technology into

Business Transformation, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.

Young, S. & Strait, P.L. (2019). Counter-strike or counterpublic?, in Rogers, R. (Ed.):

Understanding Esports: An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon, Rowman & Littlefield,

167–184.

Yu, C-L., Wang, F. & Brouthers, K.D. (2015). Domestic and foreign competitor identification

and firm performance, European Journal of International Management, 9(4), 463–483.

https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2015.070230