0% found this document useful (0 votes)
113 views

Student Evaluation

This performance evaluation rates Professor Alvin S. Alejandro of Western Mindanao State University on his teaching abilities across four categories: knowledge of subject, management of learning, commitment, and classroom management. Students are asked to rate the professor on a scale of 1 to 5 for various criteria within each category, such as demonstrating mastery of the subject matter and being available to students beyond class time. The evaluation also collects the student's signature and notes that most items in the instrument were from Quality Circles in Education Questionnaire No. 461.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
113 views

Student Evaluation

This performance evaluation rates Professor Alvin S. Alejandro of Western Mindanao State University on his teaching abilities across four categories: knowledge of subject, management of learning, commitment, and classroom management. Students are asked to rate the professor on a scale of 1 to 5 for various criteria within each category, such as demonstrating mastery of the subject matter and being available to students beyond class time. The evaluation also collects the student's signature and notes that most items in the instrument were from Quality Circles in Education Questionnaire No. 461.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

WESTERN MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY WMSU-HRMO-FR-008.

00
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OFFICE Effectivity Date: 01-Dec.-2016

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

ALVIN S. ALEJANDRO College of Science and Mathematics January 2022 – May 2022
Name of Faculty to be Rated Name of College Rating Period

Instruction: The Student evaluates their teacher using the scale below. Please encircle your rating.
1 – Poor – The faculty fails to meet the job requirements.
2 – Fair – The performance needs some development to meet the job requirements.
3 – Satisfactory – The performance meets the job requirements.
4 – Very Satisfactory – The performance meets and often exceeds the job requirements.
5 – Outstanding – The performance almost always exceeds the job requirements.
The faculty is an exceptional role model.

A. Knowledge of Subject (20%) SCALE


1. Demonstrates mastery of the subject matter (explain the subject matter without relying solely on the
1 2 3 4 5
prescribed textbook).
2. Draws and shares information on the state of the art theory and practice in his/her discipline. 1 2 3 4 5
3. Integrates subject to practical circumstances and learning intents/purposes of students. 1 2 3 4 5
4. Maintains the relevance of present topics to the previous lessons, and relates the subject matter to relevant
1 2 3 4 5
current issues and/or daily life activities.
5. Demonstrates up-to-date knowledge and/or awareness on current trends and issues of the subject. 1 2 3 4 5

TOTAL SCORE: __________


B. Management of Learning (20%) SCALE
1. Creates opportunities for intensive and/or extensive contribution of students in the class activities (e.g. breaks
1 2 3 4 5
class into dyads, triads or buzz/task groups).
2. Assumes roles as facilitator, resource person, coach, inquisitor, integrator, and referee in drawing students to
1 2 3 4 5
contribute to knowledge and understanding of the concepts at hand.
3. Designs and implements learning conditions and experience that promotes healthy exchange and/or
1 2 3 4 5
confrontations.
4. Structures/re-structures learning and teaching–learning context to enhance the attainment of collective learning
1 2 3 4 5
objectives.
5. Use of Instructional Materials ((audio/video materials: field trips, film showing, computer-aided instruction and
1 2 3 4 5
etc.) to reinforce learning processes.

TOTAL SCORE: __________


C. Commitment (40%) SCALE
1. Demonstrates sensitivity to students’ ability to attend and absorb content information. 1 2 3 4 5
2. Integrates sensitively his/her learning objectives with those of the students in a collaborative process. 1 2 3 4 5
3. Makes self available to students beyond official time 1 2 3 4 5
4. Comes regularly to class on time, well-groomed and well-prepared to complete assigned responsibilities. 1 2 3 4 5
5. Keeps accurate records of students’ performance and prompt submission of the same. 1 2 3 4 5
6. Returns test/exam papers to students and other learning outcomes with feedback or markings two weeks or so
1 2 3 4 5
after the exam date.
7. Explains the lesson thoroughly and goes to class prepared. 1 2 3 4 5
8. Avoid chatting, using of cellphone, eating and daydreaming during class hours. 1 2 3 4 5
9. Appears neat, wears decent clothes and ID during class hours. 1 2 3 4 5
10. Polite, cordial & attentive; smiles and greet students, making them comfortable & at ease. Controlled copy 1 2 3 4 5

TOTAL SCORE: __________


D. Management of Learning (20%) SCALE
1. Creates teaching strategies that allow students to practice using concepts they need to understand (interactive
1 2 3 4 5
discussion).
2. Enhances student self-esteem and/or gives due recognition to students’ performance/potential. 1 2 3 4 5
3. Allows students to create their own course with objectives and realistically defined student-professor rules and
1 2 3 4 5
make them accountable for their performance.
4. Allows students to think independently and make their own decisions and holds them accountable for their
1 2 3 4 5
performance-based largely on their success in executing decisions.

5. Encourages students to learn beyond what is required and help/guide the students on how to apply the
1 2 3 4 5
concepts learned.

TOTAL SCORE: __________


_____________________________
Signature of Student over Printed Name

Note: Most of the items in this instrument were lifted from the QCE of the NBC No. 461 questionnaire.
CONTROL COPY

You might also like