A eae [ PT Cae @ a Moorish American Consular Court, Competent Jurisdiction 5 Ss Pursuant to P.L, 8 Stat. 484 & a dC Mocrioh National Republic Federal Goverment Noxth East Umexem Teviitories and Dominions e ~ Cn Unincorporated Mecrioh Science Temple for America ~ S The True and De Jure Natural Heirs and Inferitors to the Land ‘S ~L Self. Law. Am. Master. ~ Receiver ~ Affidavit of Fact ~ AUG 2 6 2022 os Retirement Systems NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS * NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS ied Mail Number: 7018 6640 0001 2120 4687 August 26, 1443 [2022] state of Michigan Republic ) ) ss: ‘Wayne County ) DEFACTO CITY OF DETROIT INC. DEFACTO STATE OF MICHIGAN INC. DEFACTO COUNTY OF WAYNE ALL AGENTS AND ASSIGN 500 WOODWARD AVE,, SUITE 3000 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226 ATTN: OFFICE OF GOVERNOR, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE, OFFICE OF SHERIFF, OFFICE OF REGISTAR OF DEEDS, OFFICE OF COUNTY CLERK, OFFICE OF MAYOR All rise and stand and remain standing into perpetuity. Ths isa sovercign living ancient Article III Mocrish American Al Moroccan Consular Court action. We are the sovereign living justice in capitis diminutio nolo, in red ink, in propria [Persona sui juris, in proprio solo, ande in proprio heredes. i am sovereigne living justice thomas james brown bey in capitis diminutio nolo, in red ink, in propria persona sui juris, in proprio solo, ande in proprio heredes. All moors are the criginal indigenous sovereign ancient Al Moroccan Moorish American ascendants ofthe great Pharoahs of Kemet and of the ancient Moabites and Canaanites. Our full fith and trust, our allegiance, our credit and our energy are hereby vested ‘in ourselves for we are the people who are the original indigenous natural divine sovereign ancient Empire State for Morocco ande the de jure Moorish National Republic Federal Government, WASHINGTON DISTRICT FOR COLUMBIA, the Universal Moorish American Consulate and the Article [1 Moorish American Consular Court. i hereby terminate all presumed [UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY CONTRACTS]. We are peace, We are one nation, one state, one empire and one god, We hereby accept our sovereign ascencion and exercise all sovereign rights at this time and at all points in ime nune pro tune. \Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statue; Brie RR. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable ina siate whether they be local in their nature or ‘general’ be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts, And no clause in the Constitution purports to confer such @ Power upon the federal cours. - (Common Law Trust Mandatory Injunction Judicial Definition ‘Superior Common Law Court Public Notice/Public Record MACN-A040_Affidavit of Fact Authentication of Service - Cause of Action Complaint [ Page 1 of 8] ~ Divinely prepared by Supreme Judiciary Member of the above stated Sovereign Government from the Moraccen Empire, North West Amexem~a C 2s ale & Moorish American Consular Court, Competent Jurisdiction & Pursuant to P.L. 8 Stat, 484 MANDATORY INJUCNTION defined: A “mandatory injunction” is one which commands the defendant to do some Positive at. Bailey v. Schnitzius, 16 AUl. 680, 681, 45°N. J. Eq, (18 Stew.) 178. A “mandatory injunction” isthe Counterpart in equity of a “mandamus” at law, and may be used against public officers. It may bein direct form @ command, o inthe direct form of prohibiting the refusal to do an act to which another has a right. Parsons v. Maye (U'S.)23 Fed. 113, 121. “Mandatory injunetions” ate those, which require of @ party the performance of some act. and they always to some extent anticipate the judgment ofthe cour. It may ultimately be determined that such an order was ¢rroncous, but is not less within the power of the court to grant i. People v. McKAne, 28'N.Y. Supp. 981, 78 Huw 154, ‘Where « primary injunetion, while purporting simply to reswain @ wrong, and while negative in its terms, may be so framed that it restrains the defendant from permiting his previous wrongful ac to operate, and therefore virtually compels bim to undo it by removing the obstructions or erections, and by restoring the plaintiff to his former condition iti 2 {mandatory injunction,” and resembles in its effect the ‘restorative interdict” of the Roman law, and is used where the injury is immediate and pressing and repeirable, and clearly established by the proofs, and not acquiesced in by plaintiff ‘The rule is fully established at Jeastby the English decisions, and is not controverted by American authority, that in such cases, where the facts are clearly established and the injury is real, and the plaintiff acted promptly upon his acquiring ‘knowledge of defendant's proceeding, a preliminary mandatory injunetion may be granted, although the of was fully completed before the suit was commenced. Proctor v. Stuart, 46 Pac. 501, 503, 4 Oki. 679 (ci Jur, § 1359) ‘Whereas defined pursuant co Illinois Common Law Act: Sec. 1. That the common law of England, so far as the same is applicable and ofa generel nature, and all statutes or acs ofthe British parliament made in eid of, and to supply the defects of the commen law, prior to the fourth year of James the First, excepting the second section of the sixth chapter of 43d Elizabeth the eighth chapter of 13th Elizabeth, and ninth chapter of 37th Henzy Eights, and which are ofa general nature and not local to that kingdom, shal! be the rue of decision, and shall be considered as of fll force until repealed by legislative authority. (Source: R.S. 1874, p. 269.) Sovereign People or Freebom are those men who are not bound by oath to serve other men. Subjects are those men who have given an oath of service to another man, ot group of men. Every Freeborn who follows God's Laws is blessed with the right to settle his own disputes ie. holds his own court at will. Freeborn may bring suit against other freeborn, though cach has equal standing, and is not bound by any other mans court unless by cath, or voluntary delegation, A freebomn is generally empowered to settle disputes between his subjects. This i dependent upon the oath berween the freeborn and the subject. A freeman may bring suit against his own subjecis. Subjects have no standing in court, save that oftheir ‘master. They may sue their master only at his pleasure, unless the oath between the master and subject specifically allows it, which is not common. No subject may directly sue another freebomn, but must appeal to his master to sue for relief on his behalf. ‘Whereas defined pursuant to: Superior Common Law Coutt of the Ilinois republic; Because Common Law is the basis of the laws in America, Common Law is what is being referred to in almost every place where the word "Law" appears Within the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Bill of Rights. These documents were designed to eliminate the vicious Equity, Maritime or Admiralty Laws that we revolted agsinst in Our Revolution against the totalitarianism of England. FACT - The Constitution does grant the Federal union the power to establish Courts of Equity and Maritime Cours. Because the federal entity is concemed with actions and activities between the States, dealing withthe Indian Nations, and International Associations it needs a system of laws to manage these responsibilities FACT - Equity Couns are concerned with contracts, and seitlement of disagreements between fictional entities, Since the States are fictional entities the arguments and disputes between the States are properly addressed in Equity Courts. They have nothing to do with anything else. They do not deal with Sovereign People, with property rights, or other matters involving such things, FACT - Maritime Courts are concemed only with actions and activities occurring in International activities and on the high seas. Maritime Courts have jurisdiction over such things as captured naval vessels, piracy, salvage of goods ‘fom MACN-A040_Atfidavit of Fact Authentication of Service - Cause of Action Complaint [ Page 2 of 8] ~ Divinely prepared by Supreme Judiciary Member of the above sated Sovereign Government fom the Merecean Empite, Nowth West Amexem ~Moorish American Consular Court, Competent Jurisdiction @ Pursuant to P.L. 8 Stat. 484 we sunken ships, and mutiny by the crew of a ship. They do not deal with Sovereign People, with (private) property rights, or other maters involving such things. FACT - The third type of Court that is only briefly mentioned in the Constitution is the Common Law Court. The Seventh Amendment to the Constitution is very clear about the power and the authority vested in the Common Law Courts. In Suits at common law. where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. ~ Bill of Rights - Amendment VIL FACT. The significance of this is pointed up by the fact tha: any controversy involving Money (Gold and Silver Coins) in an aroun: greater than twenty dollars. or any property such as real estate can only be tried in « Cour. of Common Law with the right of wial by jury who decides the Law as well asthe Facts ofthe case! FACT. This means that any Mortgage Foreclosure action can be tried only in a Court of Common Law, and that neither the Federal Congress, nor the State Legislature, has any Constitutional authority to provide that mortgage foreclosure actions shall be actions in Equity or Maritime Courts! This means that Sheriffs Sales, Foreclosure Sales, Foreclosure Auction Sales, asa result of these Mortgage Foreciosure actions are null and void! As a direct effect the Sherifis have participated in criminal confiscation of real property (private property) in violation of the Constitution and of their oaths of office! ‘Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: — Erie RR. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938); There is no federal general common law. Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of commen law applicable in a state whether they be local in their nature or ‘general, be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. And no clause in the Constitution purpors to confer such a power upon the federal cours. FACT - When we created the Constitution We as Sovereign People issued absolute mandates to our publi servants, the officers that would staff our creation in the form of the Laws of the Constitution. This amounted to # Writ of Mandamus ‘commanding them to do exactly as they were told. “Mandate: An order by a Sovereign to his subjects. ‘Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: - Hauenstein vs Lynham (100 US 483); There can be no limitation on the power of the people of the United States-By their authority the State Constitutions were ‘made, and by their authority the Constitution ofthe United States was established. FACT - We the People also issued a Writ of Prohibition to our public servants that was designed to prohibit them from performing actions that were not specifically set fort in the Constitution, FACT - There is no contract between the Sovereign People and the Constitution, We the People cannot violate the terms ‘and conditions set forth in the Constitution. We the People cannot violate the conditions of an agreement that does not exist. FACT - The contract that exists conceming the Constitutions that We the People created is by and between the Sovereign People and our public servants. The Oath of Office, subscribed to by each public servant, is a contract that they will ‘defend and uphold the Constitution that We the People created. FACT - We the People made no provisions that bound us to any performance within the language of either the State or Federal Constitutions. The Oath of Office is therefore, swom Duties and Obligations to perform said Duties and Obligations (debts) to perform fall upon the shoulders ofthe Constitutional officers, office holders, agents and or assigns. FACT - There are not, nor can there ever be, any circumstances under which the Constitutional Offices that we created through the Constitution, can have, or can exercise, any power to bring any law suit or action at law, against any of the Sovereign People. Sovereignty of the people cannot be lost, taken away, nor given away, MACN-AO40_Affidavitof Fact Authentication of Service - Cause of Action Complaint [ Page 3 of ] ~ Divine prepare by SopremeJticiary Member af he aove sed Sovereign Covert fom the Moroean Epis, North West Amexem ~me Cas @ ll Moorish American Consular Court, Competent Jurisdiction 3 Pursuant to P.L. 8 Stat. 484 eS FACT - Using our God granted Sovereignty we created « form of government that seemed best to us to effect our safety ‘and happiness by creating 2 goverament that must serve our every command, and has no power to interfere with or bother ‘our daily lives. FACT - The proof of these statements are found in the Declaration of Independence: We hold these truths to be self- evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain un-s-lien-able Rights, that ‘among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent ofthe governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, itis the Right of the People to alter or to abolish i, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, ané organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely fo effect their Sefery and Happiness. FACT - The system of laws that each one of the Sovereign People hes agreed to be subject ois the Common Laws, Only by one of the Sovereign People specifically agreeing to be subject toa law, bill, regulation, code, or ordinance will any of ‘the Sovereign People be subject to that law, bill, regulation, code, or ordinance. FACT - This is why the system of Common Laws is not detailed in either the Federal or State Constitutions. The Sovereign People retained all rights to Common Law and in doing so granted no rights to the Federal or State entities 1o do anything thet would interfere with or irapact upon the Peoples Sovereign rights. There is no federal general common law. ‘Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: ~ Erie RR. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 US. 64 (1938); Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in state whether they be loal in their ‘ature or ‘general, be they commercial law or a part ofthe law of tors. And no clause in the Constitution purports to ‘confer such a power upon the federal courts ‘Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U. $. $33 "The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record ofthe administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.” ‘Whereas defined pursuant to: Supreme Court Annotated Statue: U.S. v. Anderson, 60 F.Supp. 649 (D. C. Wash. 1945); “Jurisdiction of court may be challenged at any stage ofthe proceeding, and also may be challenged after conviction and ‘execution of judgment by way of writ of habeas corpus.” Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: Norman v, Zieber, 3 Or at 202-03, In regard to courts of inferior jurisdiction, “if the record does not show upon its face the facts necessary to give jurisdiction, they will be presumed not to have existed.” Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 "Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments.” Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: Nudd v. Burrows, 91 U.S 426. “Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters, Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: Rubinstein v, Collins, 20 F.3d 160, 1990 “Knowing failure to disclose material information necessary to prevent statement from being misleading, or making representation despite knowledge that it has no reasonable basis in fact, are actionable as fraud under law.” ‘Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: Bransom v. Standard Hardware, Inc., 874 S.W.24 919, 1994; {a] “Party in interest may become liable for fraud by mere silent acquiescence and partaking of benefits of fraud” Ex dolo malo non oritur actio defined: Out of fraud no action arises; fraud never gives a right of action. No court will lend its aid to @ man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or illegal act. As found in Black’s Law Dietionary, Fifth Edition, page 509. MACN-A040_Affidavit of Fact Authentication of Service - Cause of Action Complaint [ Page 4 of 8 ] ~ Divinely prepared by Supreme Judiciary Member of the above stated Sovereign Goverament from the Morocean Empire, North West Amexem ~ae Cas @ ad Moorish American Consular Court, Competent Jurisdiction yp) Pursuant to P.L. 8 Stat. 484 we Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: Boyce v, Grundy, 3 Pet. 210 “Fraud vitiates everything” ‘Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Cour: Annotated Statue: United States v, Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220, 221, 1 S.Ct. 240, 261; When a Citizen challenges the acts ofa federal or state official as being iliegal, that official cannot just simply evoid Tiability based upon the fact thet he is e public offical Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: United States v, Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220, 221, 1 S.Ct. 240, 261, the United States claimed title to Arlington, Lee's estate, via tax sale some years earlier, held to be void by the Court. in so voiding the title of the United States, the Court declared: "No man in this coumay is so high that he is above the law. No officer of che law may set that law at defiance with impunity. Al! the officers of the goverment, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it Its the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit ro that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise ofthe authority which it gives. "Shall it be sac... thatthe courts cannot give remedy when the citizen has been deprived of his property by force, his estate seized and convereed to the use of the government without any lawful authority, without any process of law, and without any compensation, because the president has ordered it and his officers are in possession? If such be the law of this country, it sanctions a tyranny which has no existence in the monarchies of Europe, nor in any other government ‘hich bas @ just claim to wellregulated liberty and the protection of personal rights.” Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute; See Pierce v. United States ("The Floyd Acceptances"), 7 Wall. (74 U'S.) 666, 67 ("We have no officers in this government from the President down to the most subordinate agent, who does not hold office under the law, with prescribed duties and limited authority”); Cunningham v. Macon, 109 US. 446, 452, 456, 3 S.Ct, 292, 297 ("In these cases he is not sued as, or because he is, the officer of the government, but as an individual, and the cour is not ousted of jurisdiction because he asserts authority as such officer. To make out his defense he must show that his authority was sufficient in law to protect him... It is no answer for the defendant to say T am an officer of the government and acted under its authority unless he shows the sufficiency of that authority"); and Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270, 287, § §.Ct. 903, 912 ‘Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: Owen vs. City of Independence, 100 $ Ct. 1398; Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 §, Ct. 2502; and Hafer vs. Melo, $02 U.S. 21 WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no immunity officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; officals and judges cannot claim to actin good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance ofthe law, even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance ofthe law, the courts have ruled there is no sueh thing as ignorance of the law, its ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no ‘immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution forthe United States of America. See: Title 42 USC. See. 1983. Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: Williamson v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 815 F.2d, 369, ACLU Foundation v. Barr, 952 F.2d, 457, 203 US. App. DC 101, (CA DC 1991). "When lawsuits are brought ‘against federal officials, they must be brought against them in ther “individual” capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional tors, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity.” ‘Whereas defined pursuant to; Supreme Court Annotated Statue: Gallegos v. Haggerty, N.D. of New York, 689 F. Supp. 93 (1988): "Personal involvement in deprivation of constitutional righs is prerequisite to award of damages, but defendant may be personally involved in constitutional deprivation by direct participation, failure to remedy wrongs after learning about it, creation of a policy or custom under which unconstitutional practices occur or gross negligence in ‘managing subordinates who cause violation.” MACN-A040_Affidavit of Fact Authentication of Service - Cause of Action Complaint [ Page 5 of 8] ~ Divinely prepared ty Supreme Judiciary Member ofthe above stated Sovereign Government fom the Morocean Empire, North West Amexem ~= Cas @ a & Moorish American Consular Court, Competent Jurisdiction & Pursuant to P.L. 8 Stat. 484 Dedimus Porestatem given the “Authority” to carry out the Duties of the office of Public Trust you hold. -~Dedimus Potestatem defined: term, which means, "We have given the power." As s public servant you have “Absolutely” NO “Authority” until you have been given the Power, and o be “Authentic” your action has to be Certified and Authenticated. Holding Office of Public Trust, as a Public Official you must be able to produce a Certified copy ofthe Original “biue” Wet Ink Signature Contract “Certificate” whereby you heve been given the Authority. Without “Dedimus Potestatem,” as Public Official you have failed to Honor Current Article Four, Section One Constitutions of the United States “Full Faith and Credit shal be given in each sate to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every ‘other state (International Treaty Statute), By dishonoring this requirement all actions are “without” force or effect “Null and Voi This act in accordance withthe following U.S. Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Hele v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905): "The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty (to submit his books and papers for an examination) to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Coramon Law] long antecedent to the organization ofthe State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusel to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrestor seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upoa their rights." PRIVATE defined: Affecting or belonging to private individuals, as distinct ftom the public generally. Not offical; not clothed with office. Peopie v. Powell, 280 Mich. 699, 274 NW. 372, 373. Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1195), Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute; Ex Parte Kearny, $5 Cal. 212: Smith v. Andrews, 6 Cal (652: “A court of record is 2 “superior court.” A cour not of record is an “inferior cour.” “Inferior courts” are those whose jurisdiction is limited and special and whose proceedings are not according to the course of the common law.” “An undisputed affidavit of claim becomes final judgment. When one fails to answer or refute an affidavit of claim made against him, the affidavit first presented is considered absolute in truth. By not rebutting what has been claimed against hhim, one becomes guilty by his silence. Idem non esse et non apparet- Its the same thing not to exist and not to appear. (Qui tacet consentire videtur~ He who is silent appears to consent.” Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute; Ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet, at 202-203, [cited by SCHNECKLOTH V. BUSTAMONTE, 412 U.S. 218, 255 (1973) “The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final is as conclusive on all the world as the judgment ofthis cour: would be. It is as conclusive on this court as itis on other courts. It puts an end to inquiry concerning the fact, by deciding it. LAW MERCHANT defined: Body of law governing commercial transactions, which had its origin in common law of England regulating merchants, See U.C.C. § 1-103. See also Commercial Law; Mercantile Law; Uniform Commercial Code. Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 886) MERCHANT defined: One who is engaged in the purchase and sale of goods; a trafficker; a retailer, a trader. Term ‘commonly refers to person who purchases goods at whole- sale for resale at retail; ie. person who operates a retail business (retaller). A person who deals in goods ofthe kind or otherwise by his occupation holds himself out as having knowledge or skill peculiar tothe practices or goods involved in the transaction or to whom such knowledge or skill may be attributed by his employment of an agent or broker or other intermediary who by his occupation holds himself out as having such knowledge or skill. U‘C.C. § 2-104(1). Black's Law Dietionary Sixth Edition (page 987) MERCANTILE defined: Of, peraining to, or characteristic of, merchants, or the business of merchants; having to do with trade or commerce or the business of buying and selling merchandise; trading; commercial; conducted or acting on business principles. Black’s Lew Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 986) MERCANTILE AGENCIES: See Credit bureau. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 986) MACN.A040_Affidavit of Fact Authentication of Service - Cause of Action Complaint { Page 6 of 8 } ~ Divinely prepared by Supreme Tudiciary Member of the above tated Sovereign Goverment from dhe Moroccan Empire, North West Amexem~Ps 4 SUS eh gs Moorish American Consular Court, Competent Jurisdiction @ Pursuant to P.L. 8 Stat. 484 MERCANTILE LAW defined: An expression substantially equivalent to commercial law. It designates the system of rules, customs, and usages generally recognized and adopted by merchants and traders, and which, either in its simplicity oF as modified by common law or statutes, constitutes the lew for the regulation oftheir transactions and the solution of their controversies. The Uniform Commercial Code is the general body of law governing commercial or mercantile transactions. See Uniform Commercial Code. Biack’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 986) MERCANTILE PAPER: See Commercial Paper; Negotiable Instruments. Black’. 986) Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page MERCANTILE SPECIALTY defined: A writing that is not payable to order or to bearer but is otherwise negotiable. See U.C.C. § 3-805 (making Article 3 applicable to instruments lacking words of negotiability) Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 986) CLEAN HANDS DOCTRINE defined: Under this doctrine, equity will not grant relief toa party, who, es actor, seeks to Set judicial machinery in motion and obtain some remedy, if such party in prior conduct has violated conscience or good faith or other equitable principle. Franklin v. Franklin, 365 Mo. 442.283 $, W.2d 483, 486. One seeking equitable relief ‘cannot take advantage of one's own wrong. Fair Automotive Repair, Ine. v. Car-X Service Systems, Inc, Dist.128 MLApp.34 763,84 Ill. Dec. 25, 471 N.E2d 554,558, Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 250) ‘Whereas defined pursuant o U.C.C.: "Record means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and isrenievable in perceivable form. ‘Whereas defined pursuant to U.C.C.: "Good faith,” except as otherwise provided in Article 5, means honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing, ‘Whereas defined pursuant o U.C.C.: "Aggrieved party” means a party entitled to pursue a remedy, ‘Whereas defined pursuant to U.C.C.: "Remedy" means any remedial right to which an aggrieved party is entitled with or without resort to a tribunal. Sui Juris, known as: Jobn, of the genealogy of Doe freebom spiritual being on the land state the facts contained herein are ‘tue, correct, complete, and not misleading, to the best of my personal first hand knowledge and belief. Being of sound ‘mind, competent, over the age of 18. This my frce will, voluntary act and deed to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and my specific common law right hot to be bound by any contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without 'misrepresentation, duress, or coercion, whereby I did not sign nor consent. am not now nor have ever been a U.S. Citizen or a Fourteenth Amendment Federal Citizen or Employee, I am not bound by sworn oath or oath of office. ‘Whereas I hereby disclaim Clauses One and Two of Section One to the Fourteenth Amendment, together with Article Four Section Three Clause Two ‘Nemo, aliens: rei, sine satisdatione, de fensor idonens inelligtur defined: No man is considered a competent defender of another's property, without security. A rule of the Roman law, applied In part In admiralty cases. | Curt. 202. ‘Nemo est snpra leges defined: No one is above the law. Lofit, 142 ‘Nemo alieno nomine lege age re potest defined: No one can sue in the name of another. Dig. 50, 17, 12a. In my Private Capacity as General Administrator of said account Droit, Droit, This serves Notice that your offer has been Accepted as Valuable Consideration and Returned for Value. This property is Exempt from Levy. Please Adjust this Account forthe Proceeds, Products, Accounts and Fixtures and Release The Order(8) of The Court to Me Immediately. “Make adjustment and close this account immediately, with prejudice. | accept your Oath, Oath of Office Security ‘Agreement, Constitutions as by-laws, and Malfeasance Bond and place you in the Private commencing this selfexecuting binding contract berween you and I. Further, appoint you trustee on your honor and solemn Oath to perform your ‘obligations and duties to Protect My un-atien-able Rights in your Fiduciary Capacity against any and all claims, legal MACN-A040_Afidavit of Fact Authentication of Service - Cause of Action Complaint [ Page 7 of 8 ] ~ Divinely prepared by Supreme Judiciary Member of the above tated Sovereign Government from the Moroccan Empire, North West Amexemi ~ae se & Moorish American Consular Court, Competent Jurisdiction & Pursuant to P.L. 8 Stat. 484 actions, orders, warrants, judgments, demands, liabilities, losses, foreclosure, depositions, summonses, lawsuits, cost, fines, liens, levies, penalties, taxes, damages, interests, and expenses whatsoever, both absolute and contingent, es are due and as might become due, now existing and as might hereafter arise, and as might be suffered by, imposed on, and incurred by Debtor for any and every reason, puspose, and cause whatsoever. Please honor Obligation of Good Faith in Performance of your Duties. Quid Pro Quos, an equal exchange or substitution. ry act and dee: acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal, explici. nts without ce: make, exe reserving is not be true then Time is of the essenc agreement. Three days grace private-act and deed : ° publish, serving all thomas james brown bey. Sf juris - Moorish American National Bailcr for THOMAS JAMES BROWN Bailee All Rights Reserved / U.C.C. 1-308, U.C.C. 1-103 15216 carlisle, detroit territory, michigan republic Secured Party/Creditor, Holder-In-Due-Course AfiRes tare state of Michigan Republic) Canoes } ss ye county ) CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT (On this date the man/woman named above, in isher stated capacity, in full lfe personally before me to exccute this acknowledgement that this instrument was signed, sealed, and delivered as their fre will, voluntary act and deed to make, publish. execute, ea, ‘acknowledge and deliver under their hand and seal verified and authenticated for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. aa ayaa ” ef. RA Viichothe K. Pus Date 7 ‘Signature of NOTARY PUBI APEX - NOTARY SEAL Date Commission Expires /(0 1 Re Wwe MACN-A040_Affidavit of Fact Authentication of Service - Cause of Action Comptaint [ Page 8 of 8] ~Divinly prepared hy Supreme Judiciary Member ofthe above sted Sovereign Goverment om the Morecean Emp Noth West Amexem ~