Autoliv Special Characteristics Classification June 2016
Autoliv Special Characteristics Classification June 2016
AUTOLIV STANDARD
AS052
Table of Contents
AS052
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 3
1 PURPOSE................................................................................................................................................... 3
2 SCOPE........................................................................................................................................................ 3
3 RESPONSIBILITY ...................................................................................................................................... 3
4 DEFINITION ................................................................................................................................................ 4
5 PROCEDURE ............................................................................................................................................. 5
5.1 IDENTIFYING SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS [CC]/[SC] .......................................................................... 5
5.2 THE [CC]/[SC] LIST .......................................................................................................................... 5
5.3 CONTROLLING [CC]/[SC] .................................................................................................................. 6
5.3.1 During development ....................................................................................................................... 6
5.3.2 During PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) ........................................................................ 6
5.3.3 During serial production ................................................................................................................. 7
5.4 [CC/SC]S LIST DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................ 8
5.4.1 Language and Access ................................................................................................................... 8
5.4.2 Format for project D & PFMEA ...................................................................................................... 8
5.4.3 Master [CC]/[SC] list ...................................................................................................................... 9
5.4.4 Distribution outside Autoliv............................................................................................................. 9
6 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................... 10
7 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................... 10
7.1 AS052 APPENDIX A – [CC]/[SC] – SUMMARY ................................................................................. 10
7.2 AS052 APPENDIX B – [CC]/[SC] - LIST ........................................................................................... 10
8 MODIFICATION INDEX ............................................................................................................................ 10
Introduction
This Autoliv Standard outlines requirements for how to control risks related to
product and process through the identification and management of special product
and process characteristics (named Critical Characteristics and Significant
Characteristics).
1 Purpose
The purpose of this standard is to explain how to manage and control special
product and process characteristics to ensure that both products and processes will
fulfill functional and regulatory requirements.
It explains:
· what are CRITICAL and SIGNIFICANT CHARACTERISTICS, respectively called
[CC] and [SC].
· how to manage [CC] and [SC].during development of product and/or
manufacturing process, and during ongoing production.
· requirements that must be met for [CC] and [SC].during PPAP and production.
2 Scope
The standard is valid for all new designs since date of release of present standard
including Global Development future designs on product road map.
Global Design Authority (GDA) / Design Authority (DA) shall decide on a case to
case basis if this standard shall be applied
3 Responsibility
At the local Autoliv Company the Engineering Manager / Director (Product and
Process) is responsible for the management of special characteristics during
development process.
After production launch (TG4) (ref. AS100), the Production Manager / Director is
responsible for the management of special characteristics in conjunction with the
related DAs.
All products and processes have features described by characteristics that are
important and need to be controlled. However, some characteristics (called Special
Characteristics) require extra attention/efforts to minimize the risk of adverse
consequences.
Special characteristics are [CC] and [SC]. [CC] stands for Critical Characteristic
and [SC] for Significant Characteristic. They are classified according to the effect on
the function of the final product.
[CC] Critical Product / Process characteristic that may affect product safety,
operator safety and/or compliance with regulatory (governmental and legal)
requirements.
[SC] Significant Product / Process characteristic that may affect a product form,
fit or function or has other valid reasons for specific control and documentation.
Ex: dimensions that control features that fit to interface component at customer
should be signified as [SC] (i.e. PAB module to IP, DAB to SW, Anti-rotation tab on
retractor to sheet metal hole, locating holes, etc.).
Table 4.1
5 Procedure
The [CC]/[SC] list shall be retained in the PLM (Product Lifecycle Management)
system.
If there are multiple manufacturing processes and/or manufacturing sites for the
same product design, the responsible plant process engineer has to discuss an
update of the [CC]/[SC]-list with the DA based on the review of the PFMEA and
Control Plan at the relevant sites.
The minimum requirements to the format of the [CC]/[SC] list are shown in Appendix
B.
All [CC/SC]s shall be verified and validated during Design Verification (DV) and / or
Product Validation (PV), before PPAP.
All special characteristics determined as [CC] and [SC].during FMEA activity (see
AS104) shall be carried forward to a drawing and/or to a specification, to a [CC]/[SC]
list, a control plan and where applicable to the Standardized Work Instruction (SWI).
In some cases, (C)DA could decide to carry forward [pCC] and [pSC] for information
to the [CC]/[SC] list, e.g.: for components that may be manufactured with a process
variant and/or a technology varying from the one usually applied. It may allow the
DA to reclassify a [pCC] and [pSC] in a [CC] and [SC].
The supplier shall evaluate and implement the measurement method evaluated and
approved by Autoliv and other appropriate controls on characteristics related to their
processes.
The supplier shall evaluate their processes and further identify, document and
control additional characteristics contributing.
All [CC/SC]s on the drawings, control plans and other documents (i.e. maintenance
instruction, Standard Work Instructions, etc.) shall be referenced in the PPAP
documentation, and proven capable.
Re-use of capability or MSA data (less than 12 months old) from existing tooling and
equipment is allowed as defined in the following flowchart (picture 5.1):
Re-use Capability
Data
Is the intention to No
use existing
Production Equipment?
Yes
Does the
Yes
new product design affect Carry-out new
any [CC] and Capability Study
[SC]?
No
Is capability/MSA Yes
data
more than 12
months old?
No
Changes affecting [CC] and/or [SC] verification shall be approved by DA/GDA and
others relevant functions (e.g. Production Quality, Supplier Quality).
Changes to process that could affect the [CC] or [SC] shall be approved by Industrial
/ Process Engineering.
As a result of evaluation of their processes, the supplier shall identify and control
additional special characteristics, via the control plan and other applicable
documents (i.e. maintenance instruction, Standard Work Instructions, etc.).
Since characteristics are shared between the functions, the [CC]/[SC] list may be
accessed and managed by any member of the project cross-functional team.
In case local software versions of the [CC]/[SC] list are used, the standard [CC]/[SC]
list excel format (Appendix B) shall be used when shared within Autoliv. All [CC]/[SC]
lists (local software version and AS052 standard template) shall be stored in PLM.
If existing, the use of the Master [CC]/[SC] list as an input to the FMEA shall be
ensured.
· use a specific Master [CC]/[SC] list document type for classification and storage
in PLM.
· be stored in English as an Excel file (*.xls) fulfilling format in Appendix B.
Master [CC]/[SC] list are stored in a PLM project owned by GDA / DA. A link to this
project space can be found on the Autoliv Global Intranet /Engineering / Master
Documents inventory List
Distribution of the complete [CC]/[SC] list data outside of the Autoliv group
(customer or supplier) is strictly prohibited but can be presented to the customer
or the supplier and an extract can be provided according to the following:
6 References
AS100 Autoliv Standard Autoliv Product Development System
(APDS)
AS104 Autoliv Standard Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
AS115 Autoliv Standard Corporate Design Authority (CDA)
7 Appendices
8 Modification Index
Version Date / Author Modification
#
1 08-Jul-1997 First version released
and
[CC] [SC]
1 When applied May affect a product safety, operator safety and/or May affect a product form, fit or function significantly (other
(see §4 for compliance with regulatory (governmental and legal) than safety and regulatory) or has other valid reasons for
definition of requirements. control and documentation.
[CC] & [SC].
2 Is a deviation Yes, temporarily (see PPAP manual) Yes, temporarily (see PPAP manual)
approval
possible from
the
characteristic
specified on
the drawing?
3 Evidence for
new design
and new tool
(drawing
release after
30.06.2003)
3.1 Evidence for Initial capability Ppk > 2.0 Initial capability Ppk > 1.67
PPAP approval OR OR
ANY or ALL OF ANY or ALL OF
other methods more appropriate for certain processes or other methods more appropriate for certain processes or
products may be used with prior approval from the products may be used with prior approval from the
responsible Design Authority: responsible Design Authority:
• Poka-Yoke • Poka-Yoke
• Certification in case of Homologation, DOT approval, • Certification in case of Homologation, DOT approval, CE
CE approval, Flammability acc. FMVSS 302, Material approval, Flammability acc. FMVSS 302, Material Certificate,
Certificate, VDA 4.3 or other customer special VDA 4.3 or other customer special characteristic certification
characteristic certification requirements etc. requirements etc.
Reduced capability level shall be defined for specific Reduced capability level shall be defined for specific cases
cases by responsible Design Authority based on overall by responsible Design Authority based on overall safety
safety margin analysis. The respective capability level margin analysis. The respective capability level has to be
has to be documented on the Drawing. documented on the Drawing.
3.2 Evidence in Continuous capability Cpk > 1.67 for a stable process, if Continuous capability Cpk > 1.33 for a stable process, if
running verified by: verified by:
production • SPC (Statistical Process Control) • SPC (Statistical Process Control)
OR OR
ANY or ALL OF ANY or ALL OF
other methods more appropriate for certain processes or other methods more appropriate for certain processes or
products may be used with prior approval from an products may be used with prior approval from an
responsible Design Authority: responsible Design Authority:
• Poka-Yoke • Poka-Yoke
• Certification in case of Homologation, DOT approval, • Certification in case of Homologation, DOT approval, CE
CE approval, Flammability acc. FMVSS 302, Material approval, Flammability acc. FMVSS 302, Material Certificate,
Certificate, VDA 4.3 or other customer special VDA 4.3 or other customer special characteristic certification
characteristic certification requirements etc. requirements etc.
Reduced capability level shall be defined for specific cases Reduced capability level shall be defined for specific cases
by responsible Design Authority based on overall safety by responsible Design Authority based on overall safety
margin analysis. The respective capability level has to be margin analysis. The respective capability level has to be
documented on the Drawing. documented on the Drawing.
4 Evidence for
existing design
from before
2003-06-30,
or existing tool
• Certification in case of Homologation, DOT approval, • Certification in case of Homologation, DOT approval, CE
CE approval, Flammability acc. FMVSS 302, Material approval, Flammability acc. FMVSS 302, Material Certificate,
Certificate, VDA 4.3 or other customer special VDA 4.3 or other customer special characteristic certification
characteristic certification requirements etc. requirements etc.
Reduced capability level shall be defined for specific Reduced capability level shall be defined for specific cases by
cases by responsible Design Authority based on overall responsible Design Authority based on overall safety margin
safety margin analysis. The respective capability level analysis. The respective capability level has to be
has to be documented on the Drawing. documented on the Drawing.
4.2 Evidence in Continuous capability Cpk > 1.33 for a stable process, if Continuous capability Cpk > 1.33 for a stable process, if
running verified by: verified by:
production • SPC (Statistical Process Control) • SPC (Statistical Process Control)
OR OR
ANY or ALL OF ANY or ALL OF
other methods more appropriate for certain processes or other methods more appropriate for certain processes or
products may be used with prior approval from an products may be used with prior approval from an responsible
responsible Design Authority: Design Authority:
• Poka-Yoke • Poka-Yoke
• Certification in case of Homologation, DOT approval, • Certification in case of Homologation, DOT approval, CE
CE approval, Flammability acc. FMVSS 302, Material approval, Flammability acc. FMVSS 302, Material Certificate,
Certificate, VDA 4.3 or other customer special VDA 4.3 or other customer special characteristic certification
characteristic certification requirements etc. requirements etc.
Reduced capability level shall be defined for specific Reduced capability level shall be defined for specific cases by
cases by responsible Design Authority based on overall responsible Design Authority based on overall safety margin
safety margin analysis. The respective capability level analysis. The respective capability level has to be
has to be documented on the Drawing. documented on the Drawing..