Woodward Camp Lawsuit 2021
Woodward Camp Lawsuit 2021
1
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 2 of 23
Defendants.
Plaintiffs, Kelly Chinea and Julio Chinea, as Parents and Natural Guardians of S.C., a
minor, by and through their undersigned counsel, Kline & Specter, hereby file this Amended
1. This Complaint arises from the sexual assault of minor Plaintiff S.C. while at
Woodward Gymnastics Camp by then coach Nathaniel Singer, who was placed in a position of
power and authority over minor Plaintiff S.C. by the co-Defendants, collectively referred to as
2. Plaintiffs Kelly Chinea and Julio Chinea, are Parents and Natural Guardians of
S.C., a minor, and residents of the city of Westmont, in DuPage County in Illinois.
3. Minor Plaintiff’s full name is not contained in this pleading to protect her privacy
since she is a minor and the victim of a sexual assault, and done in good faith to avoid additional
2
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 3 of 23
embarrassment and psychological harm. Minor Plaintiff’s identity is being made known to
Woodward U, is a corporation and/or business entity organized under the laws of Pennsylvania
with a principal place of business at 134 Sports Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886, which at all
relevant times was in the business of operating, managing, marketing, and/or overseeing a global
sports company that boasts state of the art facilities and programs to many of the world’s top
action sports and gymnastics athletes, including current and future Olympians, with multiple
locations throughout the United States, Mexico and China, including a gymnastics camp known
as “Woodward Gymnastics Camp” located at 134 Sports Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886.
corporation and/or business entity organized under the laws of Delaware with a principal place of
business at 134 Sports Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886, which at all relevant times was in the
business of operating, managing, marketing, and/or overseeing a global sports company that
boasts state of the art facilities and programs to many of the world’s top action sports and
gymnastics athletes, including current and future Olympians, with multiple locations throughout
the United States, Mexico and China, including a gymnastics camp known as “Woodward
entity organized under the laws of Delaware with a principal place of business at 134 Sports
Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886, which at all relevant times was in the business of operating,
managing, marketing, and/or overseeing a global sports company that boasts state of the art
facilities and programs to many of the world’s top action sports and gymnastics athletes,
3
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 4 of 23
including current and future Olympians, with multiple locations throughout the United States,
Mexico and China, including a gymnastics camp known as “Woodward Gymnastics Camp”
entity organized under the laws of Delaware with a principal place of business at 134 Sports
Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886, which at all relevant times was in the business of operating,
managing, marketing, and/or overseeing a global sports company that boasts state of the art
facilities and programs to many of the world’s top action sports and gymnastics athletes,
including current and future Olympians, with multiple locations throughout the United States,
Mexico and China, including a gymnastics camp known as “Woodward Gymnastics Camp”
entity organized under the laws of Pennsylvania with a principal place of business at 134 Sports
Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886, which at all relevant times was in the business of operating,
managing, marketing, and/or overseeing a global sports company that boasts state of the art
facilities and programs to many of the world’s top action sports and gymnastics athletes,
including current and future Olympians, with multiple locations throughout the United States,
Mexico and China, including a gymnastics camp known as “Woodward Gymnastics Camp”
organized under the laws of Pennsylvania with a principal place of business at 134 Sports Camp
Drive, Woodward, PA 16886, which at all relevant times was in the business of operating,
managing, marketing, and/or overseeing a global sports company that boasts state of the art
4
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 5 of 23
facilities and programs to many of the world’s top action sports and gymnastics athletes,
including current and future Olympians, with multiple locations throughout the United States,
Mexico and China, including a gymnastics camp known as “Woodward Gymnastics Camp”
10. Defendant, Sports Management Group, Inc. d/b/a Woodward Gymnastics Camp is
a corporation and/or business entity organized under the laws of Pennsylvania with a principal
place of business at 134 Sports Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886, which at all relevant times
was in the business of operating, managing, marketing, and/or overseeing a global sports
company that boasts state of the art facilities and programs to many of the world’s top action
sports and gymnastics athletes, including current and future Olympians, with multiple locations
throughout the United States, Mexico and China, including a gymnastics camp known as
“Woodward Gymnastics Camp” located at 134 Sports Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886.
11. At all relevant times hereto, Defendants, Woodward Camp, Inc. d/b/a Woodward
Gymnastics Camp a/k/a Woodward U; Powdr – Woodward Pa, LLC; Powdr – Woodward
Camps, LLC; Powdr – Woodward Holdings, LLC; Woodward Camp Properties, Inc.; The
Woodward Foundation; Sports Management Group, Inc. d/b/a Woodward Gymnastics Camp
venture owned, operated, managed, marketed, and controlled a global sports company that boasts
state of the art facilities and programs to many of the world’s top action sports and gymnastics
athletes, including current and future Olympians, with multiple locations throughout the United
States, Mexico and China, including a gymnastics camp known as “Woodward Gymnastics
5
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 6 of 23
13. At all relevant times herein, Defendant Nathaniel Singer was a gymnastics coach
located at 134 Sports Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886, and employed by the Woodward
Camp Defendants.
14. Defendant Brittany J. Shulman (nee Epps) is an adult individual residing at 237 E.
15. At all relevant times herein, Defendant Brittany Shulman was an administrator at
the Woodward Gymnastics Camp and in charge of, among other things, the hiring, retention and
16. At all times relevant herein, the Woodward Camp Defendants were acting by and
through its officers, employees, servants, and agents including Matt Lea, Brittany Shulman,
Gregory Frew, Pamela Velasquez, and Elizabeth Price, in the operation of the gymnastics camp
known as “Woodward Gymnastics Camp” located at 134 Sports Camp Drive, Woodward, PA
16886, and the hiring, admitting, assigning, retaining, and supervising of employees, agents,
17. Accordingly, the Woodward Camp Defendants are not only directly liable for
their own negligence, but also vicariously liable for the negligent acts and omissions of their
employees, servants, agents, and coaches while engaged in the operation of the Woodward
Gymnastics Camp, including Defendant Nathanial Singer, Matt Lea, Brittany Schulman, and
Elizabeth Price, under theories of respondeat superior, master-servant, agency, and/or vicarious
liability.
6
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 7 of 23
19. Plaintiffs initiated this cause of action by filing a Complaint in Centre County,
1006 & 2156, as the cause of action arose in said county and Defendants’ principal place of
business and in which it regularly conducts business are in Centre County, Pennsylvania.
21. On January 25, 2022, Defendant Woodward Pennsylvania, LLC f/k/a POWDR –
Woodward PA, LLC removed this case from the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County
Pennsylvania to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
gymnastics camp located at 134 Sports Camp Drive, Woodward, PA 16886 (hereinafter
“Woodward Gymnastics Camp”), and promised skilled instructors and coaches who were “the
best in the country” who “meet our high standards” and also promised instruction from special
guest Olympians.
25. The Woodward Camp Defendants also marketed that they put “safety first” at
their gymnastics camp and recommended at least a two week stay at their facility that offered
1
Plaintiffs are also filing a Motion to Remand in this matter under separate cover because it was improperly
removed.
7
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 8 of 23
26. The Woodward Camp Defendants described their typical day at the Woodward
Gymnastics overnight camp to include instruction and activities intermixed with dining and
Nathaniel Singer as one of the gymnastics coaches at the camp. He also worked as a disc-jockey
28. Prior to the summer of 2016, Defendant Nathaniel Singer engaged in an intimate
29. During the summer of 2016, Defendant Nathaniel Singer engaged in several
violations of camp policy with regard to interactions and isolating minor female campers,
including taking them alone on golf cart rides and being alone with them in the D.J. booth.
30. These violations were known and/or should have been known to camp
administrators, including Defendant Brittany Shulman. Ms. Shulman and the other
administrators at Woodward Camp, failed to take any action against Defendant Singer to protect
31. During the Summer of 2016, Defendant Singer pursued an intimate relationship
with a female minor camper/junior counselor, referred herein as Jane Doe.2 Through the
summer, Singer sent Jane Doe proactive photos of himself over snapchat, including photos of
32. During the summer of 2016, Defendant Singer snuck Jane Doe out of her cabin in
2
Because this minor camper was a victim of sexual abuse and exploitation by Nathaniel Singer, Plaintiff is utilizing
a pseudonym. Upon information and belief the identity of this victim is known to Defendants, but will be provided
in discovery.
8
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 9 of 23
33. Despite his having engaged in multiple violations of camp policy and having
sexually abused a minor camper, the Woodward Camp Defendants and its administrators,
including Defendant Brittany Shulman, rehired Defendant Singer as a gymnastic coach and DJ in
34. During the summer of 2017, the Junior Camp Director at the Woodward Camp
learned about Defendant’s sexual abuse of Jane Doe the prior summer. He reported the abuse to
35. Defendant Singer admitted to Woodward Camp Administrators that he had sexual
contact with the Jane Doe the prior summer when she was a minor camper.
36. The Junior Counselor Director also informed Defendant Shulman that Defendant
Singer had taken another minor camper off of campgrounds alone, another violation of camp
policy.
remove Defendant Singer from the camp upon learning of his sexual abuse the prior summer and
his repeated violations of camp policy in isolating and being alone with minor campers.
38. Prior to the summer of 2018, the Woodward Camp Defendants and its
coach and D.J. at the camp, despite knowing about his sexual abuse on Jane Doe in the summer
39. Defendant Shulman participated in the rehiring of Defendant Singer for the
summer of 2018, despite knowing about his sexual abuse of Jane Doe, his repeated violations of
9
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 10 of 23
40. The Junior Counselor Director who had previously reported Defendant Singer’s
sexual abuse and violations of camp policy, suggested to Defendant Shulman that Defendant
Singer’s interactions with minor campers be limited to protect them from Defendant Singer.
41. S.C. attended the Woodward Gymnastics Camp for week nine (9) of the 2017
summer camp without incident. Upon information and belief, Defendant Singer was not at
42. S.C. attended the Woodward Gymnastics Camp for weeks nine (9) and ten (10) in
the summer of 2018. She was thirteen (13) years old that summer.
43. Despite the Woodward Camp Administrators and Defendant Shulman knowing
about Defendant Singer’s history and danger he posed to minor campers, Singer was assigned as
44. During week 10 of the 2018 summer camp, which was Saturday August 4, 2018
through Saturday August 11, 2018, Defendant Nathanial Singer began grooming S.C. by
improperly touching her buttocks while spotting her during gymnastics activities.
45. During the same week, Defendant Nathanial Singer progressed to slipping his
finger into S.C.’s leotard and into her vagina while he spotted her on the bars and during a bar
drill.
46. S.C. did not report Defendant Nathanial Singer to anyone because she was scared.
S.C. did not know that the Woodward Camp Administrators were already aware of Defendant
10
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 11 of 23
47. Prior to the summer of 2019, the Woodward Camp Defendants again rehired
Defendant Singer as a gymnastics coach and D.J. at the camp, despite knowing about his sexual
abuse on Jane Doe in the summer of 2016 and his repeated violations of camp policy.
48. Defendant Shulman again participated in the rehiring of Defendant Singer for the
summer of 2019, despite knowing about his sexual abuse of Jane Doe, his repeated violations of
49. In the Summer of 2019, the Junior Counselor Director who had previously
reported Defendant Singer’s sexual abuse and violations of camp policy, again informed
Woodward Camp Administrators, including Defendant Shulman and Pam Velasquez, that Singer
posed a danger to the kids at the camp. Defendant Shulman stated that she was fine with
Defendant Singer working at the camp despite his past “mistakes.” Defendant Shulman and
other Woodward Camp Administrators again failed to limit Singer’s interaction with minor
campers.
50. In the summer of 2019, S.C. returned to Woodward Gymnastics Camp for week
nine (9) of the twelve-week program, and Defendant Nathanial Singer was again one of the
gymnastics coaches and DJ’s. S.C. was fourteen years old at that time.
51. During week 9 of 2019 summer camp, Defendant Nathanial Singer again
52. During the same week, Defendant Nathanial Singer again progressed to slipping
his finger into S.C.’s leotard and into her vagina while he spotted her on the bars.
53. This time S.C. said to Defendant Nathanial Singer, “you spotted me weird.”
11
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 12 of 23
54. That same week, Defendant Nathanial Singer again slipped his finger into S.C.’s
55. Later that same week, Defendant Nathanial Singer tried to corner S.C. in a
hallway and close the door, but S.C. was able to push the door open and walk back out the beam
56. That same week, Defendant Nathanial Singer tried for a second time to corner
S.C. alone in a hallway but S.C. was able to push past him and get away.
57. S.C. reported to head coach Matt Lea that Coach Nathanial Singer was spotting
58. Coach Matt Lea reported S.C.’s allegations about Coach Nathanial Singer to the
59. S.C. then reported to Defendant Shulman, and her assistant, Elizabeth Price that
Coach Nathanial Singer was spotting her inappropriately, that he made her uncomfortable, and
60. Rather than provide assistance to this 14-year-old girl who reported being
sexually assaulted by one of the Woodward Gymnastics Camps coaches, Elizabeth Price and
Brittany Shulman secluded S.C. alone in a conference room and interrogated S.C. about the
report of abuse, challenged her credibility, and advised her not to ruin Nathanial Singer’s
reputation and to stop spreading rumors. They also threatened that if she continued to talk about
Singer’s assault that it would wreck her chance of being a gymnast in college.
61. Defendant Shulman’s treatment of S.C. after she reported Singer’s abuse, while in
a position of power over S.C., who was a minor girl, and while knowing that Singer had actually
12
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 13 of 23
62. S.C. suggested that coach Brittany Schulman, and Elizabeth Price review the
camera footage at the facility as there were cameras everywhere, but they claimed that they were
63. Head coach Matt Lea, Defendant Schulman, and Elizabeth Price were all
mandatory reporters, but failed to report S.C.’s allegations of sexual abuse to the police or other
law enforcement.
64. S.C. also witnessed Nathanial Singer use inappropriate spotting techniques by
touching the buttocks of other girls at Woodward Gymnastics camp in 2018 and 2019.
65. Other campers also discussed that Singer was inappropriate generally and in the
66. Other coaches and staff at Woodward Camp, beyond those discussed above, were
concerned about Singer’s behavior with campers and raised issues with camp administrators,
67. Defendant Nathanial Singer was suspended for sexual misconduct by USA
Gymnastics and/or the U.S. Center for SafeSport as of July of 2020 and given a “no contact
68. Upon information and belief, the reason Defendant Nathanial Singer was
suspended was because he had an inappropriate sexual relationship with a minor camper prior
69. Despite being aware of the report of sexual abuse committed by coach Nathanial
Singer on S.C., a minor, the Woodward Camp Defendants continued to disregard this known
13
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 14 of 23
70. In addition to failing to act, the Woodward camp Defendants and its leadership,
including Defendant Shulman, failed to report the sexual abuse to law enforcement authorities,
Singer, Defendant Shulman, and the Woodward Camp Defendants and their agents and/or
employees was a factual cause of S.C.’s harm and was a substantial factor in causing and did
directly proximately cause the severe, permanent, and grievous injuries and damages, including:
f. night terrors;
g. fear;
h. flashbacks;
i. panic attacks;
14
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 15 of 23
n. past and future pain and suffering, mental anguish and loss of life’s pleasures;
72. As set forth more fully below, the negligence, recklessness, and outrageous
conduct of the Defendants was a direct and proximate cause of harm to S.C.
73. Plaintiff S.C.’s injuries were caused solely by the negligence, recklessness, and
outrageous conduct of the Defendants, as set forth more fully herein, and were not caused or
COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE
Plaintiffs v. Defendants, Woodward Camp, Inc. d/b/a
Woodward Gymnastics Camp a/k/a Woodward U; Woodward Pennsylvania, LLC
f/k/a Powdr – Woodward Pa, LLC; Powdr – Woodward Camps, LLC; Powdr –
Woodward Holdings, LLC; Woodward Camp Properties, Inc.; The Woodward
Foundation; Sports Management Group, Inc. d/b/a Woodward Gymnastics Camp
(“Woodward Camp Defendants”) and Defendant Brittany Shulman
to screen coaches, including Nathanial Singer, for the possibility of being sexual
predators;
i. Failure to use reasonable and due care under the circumstances; and
all Defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount in excess of the prevailing arbitration limits,
77. Defendants had a duty to use reasonable care in selecting, supervising, and
controlling employees.
78. Defendants knew that it was placing coaches, including Nathanial Singer, in a
special relationship of trust with children, a vulnerable group, while acting in the course of their
79. Defendants knew it was placing coaches, including Nathanial Singer, in a position
where they would have the opportunity to commit harm to children, including S.C.
16
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 17 of 23
80. Defendants knew that it had the ability to supervise and control its coaches,
81. Prior the abuse of S.C. Defendants knew that Nathaniel Singer had sexually abused
a minor camper and committed multiple violations of camp policy by improperly being along with
82. Prior the abuse of S.C. Defendants had been specifically warned of the danger
83. Defendants knew it was in a position to supervise its coaches, including Nathanial
84. Defendants knew or should have known that its coaches could harm children,
b. Failing to ensure that Nathanial Singer was not alone with a child and/or
children;
f. Failing to educate and train Nathanial Singer and other coaches, about
appropriate spotting techniques;
17
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 18 of 23
i. Failing to share with law enforcement reports of sexual abuse within the
Woodward Gymnastics Camp, including Nathanial Singer;
86. Defendants did not attempt to prevent the foreseeable harm, and instead took a
course of conduct that increased the risk that coaches could harm minors, including Nathanial
87. Defendants actively concealed and/or ignored Nathanial Singer inappropriate and
pedophiliac behaviors.
88. Defendants were in a position to prevent the harm Nathanial Singer inflicted on
89. When S.C. reported the sexual abuse of Nathanial Singer to Defendants through
their agents, Defendants compounded the harm by silencing and threatening S.C.
Defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount in excess of the prevailing arbitration limits,
91. Defendants knew prior to 2018 that S.C. and other young children in its camps
92. Defendants also knew prior to 2018 that the access to vulnerable youths and the
physical contact required by gymnastic coaches when spotting gymnasts makes being
gymnastics coach an enticing vocation to pedophiles and others seeking to abuse and exploit
children.
93. Defendants owed a duty to exercise reasonable care in the selection and retention
of coaches in Woodward Gymnastics Camp, and specifically a duty to remain vigilant with
respect to possible pedophiles and others seeking to abuse and exploit children.
94. Prior to the abuse of S.C., Defendants had actual knowledge that Nathaniel
Singer’s sexual abuse of minor campers, his repeated violations of camp policy in being alone
with and isolating minor campers, and the danger he posed to minor campers.
95. Prior to the abuse of S.C., Defendants were specifically warned by at least one
member of their staff of the danger Nathaniel Singer posed to minor campers.
96. Defendants failed to exercise reasonable care in the selection of and retention of
19
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 20 of 23
g. Failing to terminate Nathanial Singer and/or remove him from the position of
gymnastics coach after learning of his prior sexual abuse of minor-camper,
repeated violations of camp policy in being alone with and isolating minor
campers, and the danger he posed to minor campers;
damages, jointly and severally, in an amount in excess of the prevailing arbitration limits, exclusive
70. Defendant is vicariously liable for the actions described herein of its agents,
servants, and/or employees, including, but not limited to, Matt Lea, Gregory Frew, Pamela
Velasquez, Elizabeth Price and Defendants Brittany Shulman and Nathanial Singer.
71. The sexual assaults occurred while Nathanial Singer was performing his duties as
72. The sexual assaults occurred while Nathanial Singer was a gymnastics coach at
the Woodward Gymnastics Camp’s overnight summer camp, and thus occurred within the
authorized time and space limits of his employment with the Woodward Camp Defendants.
20
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 21 of 23
73. Defendants were aware of Nathaniel Singer’s prior misconduct with Minor
74. Defendants rehired Nathaniel Singer in the Summer of 2018, knowing of his prior
sexual abuse of campers and ratifying and adopting any conduct by Defendant Singer that may
75. Defendants again rehired Nathaniel Singer in the Summer of 2019, knowing of
his prior sexual abuse of campers and ratifying and adopting any conduct by Defendant Singer
76. The actions and/or omissions of Defendants and their agents, servants, and/or
employees and administrators, including Matt Lea, Gregory Frew, Pamela Velasquez, Elizabeth
Price and Defendants Brittany Shulman and Nathanial Singer, were a factual cause of and/or
placed Plaintiff S.C. at an increased risk of harm for and/or was a substantial factor in causing,
and did directly and proximately cause the harm suffered described herein by Plaintiff S.C.
77. Defendants are liable for the negligent conduct of any and all agents, ostensible
agents, servants, and/or employees, including Matt Lea, Gregory Frew, Pamela Velasquez,
Elizabeth Price and Defendants Brittany Shulman and Nathanial Singer as described herein
21
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 22 of 23
79. The aforementioned conduct by Defendant Nathanial Singer inflicted upon S.C.
while at the Woodward Gymnastics Camp in the summer of 2018 and 2019, constitute sexual
80. As a result of Defendant Nathanial Singer’s repeated acts of sexual assault and
physical battery, S.C. was caused to suffer painful physical, metal, and emotional harm as outlined
above.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand damages against all Defendants, jointly and severally,
in an amount in excess of the prevailing arbitration limits, exclusive of pre-judgment interest, delay
81. The preceding paragraphs of this Complaint are incorporated as though fully set
forth therein.
82. Defendants through their agents and employees, Defendant Shulman and other
Woodward Camp Administrators, not only permitted Defendant Singer to sexually abuse her
which they were charged with protecting her, but further traumatized her by interrogating her and
83. Defendants through their agents and employees, Defendant Shulman and other
interrogating her without the presence of a parent and using their positions of power and authority
22
Case 4:22-cv-00134-MWB Document 5 Filed 02/09/22 Page 23 of 23
84. Defendant Shulman and the other Camp Administrators secluded and pressured
S.C. despite knowing that Nathaniel Singer had previously sexually abused another minor camper.
85. Defendant Shulman and the other Camp Administrators intentionally manipulated
S.C. into not coming forward regarding the abuse she suffered at Woodward Camp by stating that
the allegations would ruin Defendant Singer’s reputation when they knew Defendant Singer had
previously abused another minor camper and the Woodward Administrators had failed to report
it.
86. Defendant Shulman and the other Camp Administrators intentionally attempted to
87. The aforementioned conduct of the Woodward Camp Defendants, by and through
Defendant Shulman and other camp administrators was extreme and outrageous.
88. As a direct and proximate result of the intentional conduct of Woodward Camp
Defendants, by and through Defendant Shulman and other camp administrators, S.C. was caused
to suffer severe emotional distress as described herein, including panic attacks, night terrors, and
PTSD.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand damages against all Defendants, jointly and severally,
in an amount in excess of the prevailing arbitration limits, exclusive of pre-judgment interest, delay
Respectfully Submitted,
23