Scribd
Upload
59 views3 pages

Caso1 - Solar PV Analisis For A Power Plant

This report summarizes the performance modeling of a 102 kW commercial rooftop photovoltaic system over a 20 year period. Key details include: - The system has 255 solar modules totaling 102 kW DC nameplate capacity with 4 inverters totaling 80.9 kW AC capacity. - In the first year, the system is estimated to generate 146,000 kWh and have a capacity factor of 16.4% and performance ratio of 0.73. - Over the 20 year project life, the nominal levelized cost of energy is estimated to be 3.8 cents/kWh with a positive net present value of $82,700 and payback period of 7.5 years.

Uploaded by

Alexander Valencia Valencia Rendon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
59 views3 pages

Caso1 - Solar PV Analisis For A Power Plant

This report summarizes the performance modeling of a 102 kW commercial rooftop photovoltaic system over a 20 year period. Key details include: - The system has 255 solar modules totaling 102 kW DC nameplate capacity with 4 inverters totaling 80.9 kW AC capacity. - In the first year, the system is estimated to generate 146,000 kWh and have a capacity factor of 16.4% and performance ratio of 0.73. - Over the 20 year project life, the nominal levelized cost of energy is estimated to be 3.8 cents/kWh with a positive net present value of $82,700 and payback period of 7.5 years.

Uploaded by

Alexander Valencia Valencia Rendon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

System Advisor Model Report

Detailed Photovoltaic 102 DC kW Nameplate 6.25, -75.58


Commercial $1.40/W Installed Cost UTC -5
Performance Model Financial Model
Modules Project Costs
Jinko Solar Co._ Ltd JKMS400M-72L-V-TI Total installed cost $142,995
Cell material Mono-c-Si Salvage value $14,299
Module area 1.92 m² Analysis Parameters
Module capacity 400.32 DC Watts Project life 20 years
Quantity 255 Inflation rate 4%
Total capacity 102.08 DC kW Real discount rate 6.4%
Total area 489 m²
Project Debt Parameters
Inverters Debt fraction 50%
Fronius International GmbH: Fronius Symo Advanced 20... Amount $71,497
Unit capacity 20.227000 AC kW Term 10 years
Input voltage 450 - 800 VDC DC V Rate 5%
Quantity 4
Total capacity 80.91 AC kW Tax and Insurance Rates
DC to AC Capacity Ratio 1.26 Federal income tax 31 %/year
AC losses (%) 1.00 State income tax 0 %/year
Sales tax (% of indirect cost basis) 19%
Array Insurance (% of installed cost) 0.34 %/year
Strings 17 Property tax (% of assessed val.) 0 %/year
Modules per string 15
String Voc (DC V) 747.00 Incentives
Tilt (deg from horizontal) 7.00 Federal ITC 50%
Azimuth (deg E of N) 180 Electricity Demand and Rate Summary
Tracking no Annual peak demand 0.1 kW
Backtracking - Annual total demand 231 kWh
Self shading no Generic Commercial
Rotation limit (deg) - Fixed charge: $30/month
Shading yes Monthly excess with $ rollover
Snow no Annual rate escalation: 12%/year
Soiling yes Tiered TOU energy rates: 2 periods, 1 tier
DC losses (%) 4.44 Results
Performance Adjustments Nominal LCOE 3.8 cents/kWh
Availability/Curtailment none Net present value $82,700
Degradation none Payback period 7.5 years
Hourly or custom losses none
Annual Results (in Year 1)
GHI kWh/m²/day 5.34
POA kWh/m²/day 94.00
Net to inverter 152,000 DC kWh
Net to grid 146,000 AC kWh
Capacity factor 16.4
Performance ratio 0.73

System Advisor Model Standard Report generated by SAM 2020.2.29 on Tue Nov 24 19:31:10 2020 1/3
Detailed Photovoltaic 102 DC kW Nameplate 6.25, -75.58
Commercial $1.40/W Installed Cost UTC -5
Year 1 Monthly Generation and Load Summary
Electricity from System
Thousand kWh
10

0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Load
Thousand kWh

0.02

0.01

0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Year 1 Monthly Electric Bill and Savings ($)
Month Without System With System Savings
Jan 31 30 1
Feb 30 30 0
Mar 31 30 1
Apr 31 30 1
May 31 30 1
Jun 31 30 1
Jul 31 30 1
Aug 31 30 1
Sep 31 30 1
Oct 31 30 1
Nov 31 30 1
Dec 31 -6,561 6,592
Annual 375 -6,231 6,606

NPV Approximation using Annuities


Annuities, Capital Recovery Factor (CRF) = 0.1228 Investment = Installed Cost - Debt Principal - IBI - CBI
Investment $-8,700 Sum: Expenses = Operating Costs + Debt Payments
Expenses $-7,100 $10,100 Savings = Tax Deductions + PBI
Savings $10,500 NPV = Sum / CRF: Energy value = Tax Adjusted Net Savings
Energy value $15,500 $82,000 Nominal discount rate = 10.656%
Payback Cash Flow (Payback Period = 7.5 years)
400
Thousand $

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Year

System Advisor Model Standard Report generated by SAM 2020.2.29 on Tue Nov 24 19:31:10 2020 2/3
Detailed Photovoltaic 102 DC kW Nameplate 6.25, -75.58
Commercial $1.40/W Installed Cost UTC -5
Nominal POA (kWh)
958,224
Shading
-3.617 %

Soiling
-5 %

Reflection (IAM)
-3.4 %

Bifacial
-0 %

Nominal DC energy (kWh)


176,713
Snow
-0 %

Module deviation from STC


-9.591 %

Inverter MPPT clipping


-0 %

Module mismatch
-2 %

Diodes and connections


-0.5 %

DC wiring
-2 %

Tracking error
-0 %

Nameplate
-0 %

DC power optimizer
-0 %

DC availability and curtailment


-0 %

DC Lifetime daily losses- year one


-0 %

Net DC energy (kWh)


152,670
Inverter power clipping
-0 %

Inverter power consumption


-0.599 %

Inverter nighttime consumption


-0.07 %

Inverter efficiency
-2.48 %

Gross AC energy (kWh)


147,883
AC wiring
-1 %

AC Lifetime daily losses- year one


-0 %

Transformer loss
-0 %

AC Availability and curtailment


-0 %

Annual energy (kWh)


146,402

Commercial | Flat Plate PV | Simple Efficiency Module Model | Sandia Inverter Database
System Advisor Model Standard Report generated by SAM 2020.2.29 on Tue Nov 24 19:31:10 2020 3/3

You might also like