Scribd
Upload
73 views

PT Rubrics For Jingle

This document contains evaluation criteria and scores for five groups that presented on quality of presentation, melody, and effectiveness of presentation. The criteria include ease of understanding, volume, rhythm, catchiness, preparation, and creativity. Exemplary groups had easy to understand presentations that were loud and clear with accurate rhythm and were extremely catchy. Their presentations were very creative from start to finish and well thought out. Satisfactory groups were mostly easy to understand but lacked loud volume or had minor errors. Their presentations showed some creativity but lacked creativity towards the end. Unsatisfactory groups had presentations that were not easy to understand or loud with many errors and lacked creativity and thought.

Uploaded by

Janrey Oriña Navalta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
73 views

PT Rubrics For Jingle

This document contains evaluation criteria and scores for five groups that presented on quality of presentation, melody, and effectiveness of presentation. The criteria include ease of understanding, volume, rhythm, catchiness, preparation, and creativity. Exemplary groups had easy to understand presentations that were loud and clear with accurate rhythm and were extremely catchy. Their presentations were very creative from start to finish and well thought out. Satisfactory groups were mostly easy to understand but lacked loud volume or had minor errors. Their presentations showed some creativity but lacked creativity towards the end. Unsatisfactory groups had presentations that were not easy to understand or loud with many errors and lacked creativity and thought.

Uploaded by

Janrey Oriña Navalta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Name: Matt, Princess, Ruth, Samantha, Raina

EXEMPLARY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Score


(21-30) (16-20) (1-15)
QUALITY OF The presentation was The presentation was Some of the Lyrics is not
PRESENTATION: 10% easy to understand, the easy to understand but easy to understand, the
 Easy to understand voice are loud and clear. not loud. voice are not loud.
 Loud and Clear
MELODY: 5% Accurate Rhythm and One/Two Minor Error and Many Errors and not
 Catchy extremely catchy somewhat catchy catchy
EFFECTIVENESS OF Start to End was very Start was creative but not No creativity at all. Not
PRESENTATION: 15% creative. It is very well up to the end. Most parts very thought out
 Clearly prepared thought out appeared to have been
 Creative thought out

Name: Sydney, John Albert, Zaijohn, Nash, Erich


EXEMPLARY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Score
(21-30) (15-20) (1-14)
QUALITY OF The presentation was The presentation was Some of the Lyrics is not
PRESENTATION: 10% easy to understand, the easy to understand but easy to understand, the
 Easy to understand voice are loud and clear. not loud. voice are not loud.
 Loud and Clear
MELODY: 5% Accurate Rhythm and One/Two Minor Error Many Errors
 Catchy extremely catchy
EFFECTIVENESS OF Start to End was very Start was creative but not No creativity at all. Not
PRESENTATION: 15% creative. It is very well up to the end. Most parts very thought out
 Clearly prepared thought out appeared to have been
 Creative thought out

Name: Ellyze, Noreen, Ronaldo, Crisianne


EXEMPLARY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Score
(21-30) (16-20) (1-15)
QUALITY OF The presentation was The presentation was Some of the Lyrics is not
PRESENTATION: 10% easy to understand, the easy to understand but easy to understand, the
 Easy to understand voice are loud and clear. not loud. voice are not loud.
 Loud and Clear
MELODY: 5% Accurate Rhythm and One/Two Minor Error and Many Errors and not
 Catchy extremely catchy somewhat catchy catchy
EFFECTIVENESS OF Start to End was very Start was creative but not No creativity at all. Not
PRESENTATION: 15% creative. It is very well up to the end. Most parts very thought out
 Clearly prepared thought out appeared to have been
 Creative thought out

Name: Raizel, Athena, Lovely Gwen, Chloe Therese, Chloe Denise


EXEMPLARY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Score
(21-30) (15-20) (1-14)
QUALITY OF The presentation was The presentation was Some of the Lyrics is not
PRESENTATION: 10% easy to understand, the easy to understand but easy to understand, the
 Easy to understand voice are loud and clear. not loud. voice are not loud.
 Loud and Clear
MELODY: 5% Accurate Rhythm and One/Two Minor Error Many Errors
 Catchy extremely catchy
EFFECTIVENESS OF Start to End was very Start was creative but not No creativity at all. Not
PRESENTATION: 15% creative. It is very well up to the end. Most parts very thought out
 Clearly prepared thought out appeared to have been
 Creative thought out

You might also like