Journal of Religion & Film
Volume 10 Article 5
Issue 1 April 2006
April 2006
The Exorcism of Emily Rose
Donna Yarri
Alvernia College,
[email protected]Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf
Recommended Citation
Yarri, Donna (2006) "The Exorcism of Emily Rose," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 10 : Iss. 1 , Article 5.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol10/iss1/5
This Film Review is brought to you for free and open
access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted
for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an
authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more
information, please contact
[email protected].
The Exorcism of Emily Rose
Abstract
This is a review of The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005).
This film review is available in Journal of Religion & Film: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol10/iss1/5
Yarri: The Exorcism of Emily Rose
This film is based on the purportedly true story of a religiously devout
college-age Catholic girl whom she and her family believe is possessed by a demon.
The focus of the story is the trial of Fr. Richard Moore (Tom Wilkinson), who has
been charged with criminally negligent homicide for the death of Emily Rose
(Jennifer Carpenter), which occurred as a result of her exorcism under his care. As
the trial proceeds, Emily's story is told, from her early affliction by demons; to the
physical, emotional and spiritual suffering she experienced; to her eventual
hospitalization; and then to the ultimate exorcism, which results in her death. Fr.
Moore's principal concern while on trial is not escaping jail as much as being
granted the opportunity to "tell Emily's story,” which we discover near the end of
the film in Fr. Moore's reading of the letter Emily wrote on the day after the
exorcism. Emily reports her experience of having spoken with the Virgin Mary,
who apparently gave her the choice of leaving behind her suffering, or staying on
earth and showing others the way to the spiritual realm. Emily receives the stigmata
as a result of this encounter, which Fr. Moore claims to have seen. The basic issue
the film raises is whether or not Emily was indeed possessed by demons, or whether
she was simply mentally ill.
This film inevitably invites comparison with the very popular and well-
known film on demon possession made in 1973, The Exorcist. In viewing and
comparing these two films, one wonders why the latter was even deemed necessary,
Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2006 1
Journal of Religion & Film, Vol. 10 [2006], Iss. 1, Art. 5
considering how similar the stories are. Both had young seemingly innocent and
sweet girls who exhibit bizarre, inexplicable behavior, including bodily contortions
and speaking different languages. Both result in the performance of an exorcism,
remarkably similar in content, and both deeply affect the priests involved. And yet
in spite of the fact that The Exorcism of Emily Rose is based on a true story, the film
does not engender any real feelings of sympathy either towards Emily or Fr. Moore.
Rather, it has more the feel of a horror film, with a boring and uneventful trial, and
a priest who seems rather odd. If one were interested in watching a film on demon
possession, The Exorcism would be a far better choice, and watching it is still an
excellent cinematic experience, even 30 years later.
In spite of its many weaknesses as a film, however, The Exorcism of Emily
Rose still raises a number of significant questions for religion, especially
Christianity. Most obvious is whether or not demons exist. Many conservative
Christians and Catholics as well believe in the reality of demons and subsequently
demon possession, taking the Bible quite literally on this point. Most moderate and
liberal Christians have accepted the demythologizing approach to the Bible of
theologians such as Rudolf Bultmann, and have rejected demons as part of an
outdated cosmology and worldview. In either case, the deeper question may be the
relationship between mind and spirit. What does it mean to have a religious
experience? Are all unusual and seemingly bizarre "religious” experiences simply
https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol10/iss1/5 2
Yarri: The Exorcism of Emily Rose
the result of mental illness? How do we truly "discern the spirit/s?” Certainly in at
least the Roman Catholic tradition, visions and the stigmata are believed to be the
province of the truly spiritual. Although we cannot prove that these experiences are
legitimate religious ones, we cannot disprove them either. Ultimately, faith is a
principal factor in answering these questions. The film also raises the issue of
redemptive suffering. Are there certain humans chosen by God to suffer in unique
ways in order to somehow instruct others in the spiritual life? While pain and
suffering are certainly not experiences to be sought after for their own sake, perhaps
they can and do have a religious significance beyond the merely physical and
mental.
The Exorcism of Emily Rose ends with a shot of her epitaph, which quotes
Philippians 2:12: "Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.” This
passage also suggests the conclusions reached by the filmmaker of the reality of
Emily's story and experience of demon possession. However, it also raises the
question anew for each of us of what is meant by salvation, how it is attained, and
what is the role of evil in this quest. Whether demons exist in reality or in our minds,
this film reminds the religious among us that there is certainly more to spirituality
than meets the mind.
Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2006 3