IndigReligion ReviewEssay
IndigReligion ReviewEssay
Reviewed Work(s): Legends of the Plumed Serpent: Biography of a Mexican God by Neil
Baldwin; The Myth of Quetzalcoatl by Enrique Florescano and Lysa Hochroth; Time and
Sacrifice in the Aztec Cosmos by Kay Almere Read; Inka Bodies and the Body of Christ:
Corpus Christi in Colonial Cuzco, Peru by Carolyn Dean; Indigenous South Americans of
the Past and Present: An Ecological Perspective by David J. Wilson; Native Traditions in
the Postconquest World by Elizabeth Hill Boone and Tom Cummins; Indian Slavery, Labor,
Evangelization, and Captivity in the Americas: An Annotated Bibliography by Russell M.
Magnaghi
Review by: Anna L. Peterson
Source: Latin American Research Review, Vol. 36, No. 2 (2001), pp. 237-254
Published by: The Latin American Studies Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2692098
Accessed: 16-08-2017 17:50 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
The Latin American Studies Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve
and extend access to Latin American Research Review
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
INDIGENOUS CULTURE AND RELIGION
Anna L. Peterson
University of Florida
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American Research Review
acteristic of Mexican life or even an archetype within the culture that I might
be able to capture, that would have the staying power to become the center
of my book" (p. 6). Eventually he settled on Quetzalcoatl, "the only symbol
with so much staying power that it can be found permeating nearly every
formative culture of Mexico" (p. 10).
Baldwin's discussion of precolonial Quetzalcoatl legends is gener-
ally competent, although specialists will note a few dubious claims, such as
his description of human sacrifice as "penance" (p. 34) and his insistence on
"the Aztecs' absolute conviction" that Cortes represented the return of Quet-
zalcoatl (p. 53). A larger problem emerges from his use of the plumed ser-
pent as a metasymbol that sets the pattern for all that follows. Identifying
Quetzalcoatl as the primary archetype of Mesoamerican culture diminishes
the significance of other myths and symbols. It also means collapsing dif-
ferent elements, including other feathered serpents, into a unified image of
Quetzalcoatl and perhaps seeing Quetzalcoatl in too many different times
and places. The other risk is perceiving too much in Quetzalcoatl itself. No
single image can capture a whole culture, and Baldwin may ask Quetzal-
coatl to bear too much weight.
This weakness in Legends of the Plumed Serpent becomes especially
apparent when Baldwin arrives at the conquest. The main problem is the
increasing stretch required to accomplish both his goals: writing a biogra-
phy of Quetzalcoatl and also constructing a thumbnail sketch of Mexican
cultural history. The effort to unite these two projects through the use of
Quetzalcoatl as a defining archetype, already tenuous in the preconquest era,
becomes increasingly problematic for the colonial period.Throughout his
discussion of the Spanish arrival, Christian missions, and other political and
cultural processes during colonization, Baldwin strives to keep Quetzalcoatl
front and center, as for example "the primary touchstone" for debates over
creole identity (p. 124). But he often fails to find a direct relevance for his title
character, and entire chapters go by with few or no references to the plumed
serpent, particularly during the revolutionary and independence periods. Some
of the connections Baldwin makes are thin to the point of breaking, such as
his citation of Octavio Paz's identification of Francisco Zapata and other
Mexican nationalist heroes as "only translations of Quetzalcoatl ... in fact,
unconscious translations" (p. 143). To be fair, it is not clear who is stretching
more here, Paz or Baldwin.
Baldwin encounters twentieth-century interpreters with evident
relief. He contends that Mexicans like Diego Rivera and Jose Clemente
Orozco and foreigners such as D. H. Lawrence shared his view of Quetzal-
coatl as a uniquely potent metaphor for Mexican culture. (Yet for other in-
terpreters, such as Nicaraguan poet Ernesto Cardenal, Quetzalcoatl embod-
ies subjugated indigenous and mestizo America.) Despite a few gaps and
weaknesses in his treatment of earlier periods, Baldwin generally succeeds,
as Tony Hillerman's jacket blurb contends, in "collect[ing] what the archae-
238
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEW ESSAYS
1. Nahua refers to "all related Nahuatl-speaking peoples who inhabited Central Mexico in
the post-Classic period (1200-1521 C.E.) just preceding Spanish rule" (Read, p. 4; see also
Baldwin, p. xi). Nahuatl designates the language spoken in Tenochtitlan and surrounding
areas, which had become by the conquest a lingua franca in a large part of Mesoamerica.
239
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American Research Review
240
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEW ESSAYS
parallels lead Florescano to conclude that "faced with the common mystery
of death and the periodic resurrection of life in nature, human beings from
different regions and cultures produce similar symbols" (p. 6).
This quest for mythical parallels can misread or ignore elements that
do not accord with preselected archetypes. Florescano follows a track set by
Mircea Eliade and other historians of religion, who have created overarching
theories of myth and symbol based on parallels among key images, as ex-
emplified by Florescano's "mother goddess."This approach to myth and reli-
gion, at least in Eliade's version, sets ordinary or "profane" history in stark
opposition to the eternal and unchanging sacred. In Time and Sacrifice in the
Aztec Cosmos, Kay Read argues that this vision of history as the opposite of
the sacred grossly misinterprets Mexica culture. For the Mexica, the changes,
destructions, and creations of history were the source of life itself.
Read begins by describing two images on a plaque from fifteenth-
century Tenochtitlan: the ritual binding of fifty-two reeds and a fire drill
sparking a sacrificial fire. Although the plaque provides little information
for nonspecialists, Read proposes that it illuminates "a somewhat messy and
highly complex system of interlocking images, interrelated significations,
and polyvalent metaphors. These metaphors founded Mexica conceptions
of time and sacrifice, a system which to many may seem more terrifying
than beautiful" (pp. 1-2). Finding Mexica culture a little of both, Read draws
on a wide variety of oral, written, and especially visual sources to describe
a complex yet coherent and distinctive worldview. The images on the plaque
crystallize two fundamental themes pervading Time and Sacrifice in the Aztec
Cosmos. First, the reeds symbolize the ceremony of the "Binding of the Years,"
a ritual occurring at the end of a fifty-two-year solar cycle. On the plaque,
the reeds underline the centrality of temporal transformation in the Mexica
worldview. The Mexica believed that all things moved with the powers of
life and thus all things constantly changed. The second image of the fire
drill igniting a sacrificial flame points to the centrality of sacrificial trans-
formation, the need shared by gods, humans, and other beings to eat other
entities in order not to die before their time.
It is especially difficult to understand this worldview today because
the Spanish conquerors systematically sought to eliminate written, oral, visual,
and ritual dimensions of indigenous Mesoamerican worldviews. Due to the
intense Spanish interference in postconquest indigenous texts, Read argues,
the best primary resources for pre-Colombian religions are plaques and other
archaeological remains, which were least touched by the Spanish (p. 17).
Yet Read does not entirely ignore written and oral traditions. For example,
she discusses in some detail the story of the Birth of the Fifth Sun, which
portrays the creation of the cosmos not as an ex nihilo act over in a few mo-
ments but rather as "the result of a sequence of concrete, destructive events
in which one thing changes to create another, each new thing heir to the
previous" (p. 58).
241
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American Research Review
This vision of change raises the issue of human sacrifice. Read stresses
in Time and Sacrifice in the Aztec Cosmos that the various forms of Mexica sac-
rifice were rooted in a realistic vision of biological life: "No organism can
exist without eating, none will exist forever, and when an organism dies, its
remains rot and change into that which nourishes other organisms. Destruc-
tion does indeed create, even now" (p. 59). In Mexica culture, the practice
of sacrifice reflected a desire to order and partially control the processes of
death and change in order to preserve the processes of birth and life. As
Read explains, "Because death gave life, the Mexica moral community was
predicated on creating appropriate life-giving destructions" (p. 182). These
creative destructions took various forms, including the best-known but var-
ied ritual of human sacrifice as well as more frequent offerings such as cakes,
nonhuman animals, and especially limited ritual bleeding of oneself or an-
other (pp. 128-29). Thus the "sacrificial logic" of Mexica culture was rooted
not only in spectacular rare ceremonies but in everyday practices, images,
and conceptions. In Read's view, Mexica sacrificial realities rested in an im-
manent daily order so mundane and so intimate that members of Mexica
society learned from childhood on that sacrificial transformation was true
and necessary. The inculcation of this worldview instilled a practice of "non-
reflection on those realities" (p. 178), meaning that no one questioned the
practice of sacrifice or the philosophical legitimation of it.
This conclusion may be the only significant point on which Read's
argument could be more nuanced. In her effort to show how sacrificial logic
pervaded all aspects of Mexica culture, she links consensus to unanimity.
But the fact that an idea or practice is inculcated from childhood on and is
widely accepted need not preclude cultural reflection or criticism of that prac-
tice. This point is especially evident in recent scholarship on the limits of
Christian missionizing in the colonial era. No culture achieves unanimity,
even about relatively trivial practices, and therefore why would the Mexica
be able to maintain unanimity about human sacrifice? Readers do not have
to believe that every single member of Mexica society felt the same about
sacrifice to be persuaded that sacrificial logic was embedded in everyday
life. Read's overstatement probably stems from the need to counter the com-
mon claim that only massive coercion could explain the institution of human
sacrifice. She argues persuasively that while some coercion probably oc-
curred, coercion alone cannot explain why individuals took part in sacrifi-
cial rituals. Some participants were willing, based on their embeddedness
in and commitment to the sacrificial logic of Mexica culture (p. 188).
This logic shaped not only ritual but also conceptions of time and
history. The Mexica believed that history was continuous, that everything
in the universe changed constantly. There was no way to prevent the passage
of time, to avoid change, to find a realm beyond history. For the Mexica,
Read contends, history was not opposed to the sacred. Rather, history was
all there was, and consequently the profane "equaled" the sacred (p. 157).
242
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEW ESSAYS
243
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American Research Review
losses and suffering of their Andean subjects, Dean explores the ways in
which indigenous persons employed Corpus Christi to criticize, defy, or rein-
terpret the culture of the colonizers. For example, she describes colonialists'
fear that Andeans "were secretly worshiping wak'as (sacred places and things)
on Corpus Christi" (p. 52). Although the Spanish tried to crush such "idol-
atrous practices," they always fell short in "their ability to understand and
to control the thoughts and faith of the colonized." This failure posed a sig-
nificant problem for the colonizers: "while behavior could be observed, its
meaning was opaque. Intentions and beliefs-hearts and minds-were be-
yond evaluation" (p. 52). Precisely because intentionality is so often hidden
or ambiguous in religious rituals and practices, religion has been a primary
site of indigenous and anti-colonial resistance. An unfortunate gap in Dean's
analysis is a failure to reflect both on the distinctively religious nature of the
colonial institution of Corpus Christi and on the distinctive character of reli-
gious resistance to colonization and postcolonial domination more generally.
Despite this lack, Dean shows effectively that the Spaniards' desire
to convert Andeans to Christianity inevitably opened up possibilities for re-
sistance. Any triumph the colonizers achieved was ambivalent, and their
efforts to proclaim victories over indigenous ideas and practices were often
premature or overly optimistic. Suspecting as much, Spanish authorities tried
to gloss over the threat of indigenous noncompliance in various ways. For
example, Dean notes, the Spanish "chose to understand (and consequently
dismiss) the discontent of the colonized as the irrational misbehavior of
drunken Indians" (p. 58). This interpretation missed the potential for vio-
lence and outright resistance that lurked in "battle dances" (p. 60).
The ambiguity of Corpus Christi derived more from the way that it
embodied indigenous resistance to Spanish domination, however. The feast
also contained possibilities for Inka elites to legitimize their own relatively
privileged social positions. As Dean emphasizes, colonial Andean society
was far from homogeneous, and "the simple binaries produced by the col-
onizer failed to contain the heterogeneity of Cuzquefio society" (p. 177).
Despite Spanish attempts to blur ethnic distinctions, "Colonial-period An-
deans did not see the world as composed of indios in opposition to espafioles."
Inka nobles continued to understand themselves as such and used Corpus
Christi to reinforce their elite position relative to other Andeans. In a "stud-
ied hybridity" (p. 122), Inka elites drew on Spanish and indigenous traditions,
as evident in their costumes for the Corpus Christi festival, in efforts "to
fashion their own bodies as empowered sites of cultural confluence" (p. 123).
Their vestments combined Hispanic and Andean aspects in ways that man-
aged simultaneously to accommodate European notions about elite adorn-
ment, to reemphasize the nobility of the Inka past, and to differentiate be-
tween European and Andean culture in order to position the caciques as
privileged mediators. To describe the distinctive identity that Andean elites
244
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEW ESSAYS
245
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American Research Review
246
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEW ESSAYS
247
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American Research Review
248
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEW ESSAYS
ways in which their Christianity was described and interpreted by the friars
who presided over their religious life" (p. 362). Burkhart emphasizes the
syncretic nature of the faith adopted by the Nahuas, who did not become
Christian "in anything like the sense implied by conventional understand-
ings of religious conversion." What they did was "represent themselves as
Christians, whatever they understood Christianity to be." Further, "by selec-
tively responding to the devotional options presented them by the friars,
[the Nahuas] exerted considerable control over the creation of their church"
(p. 362). Like the black and indigenous Peruvians who created the cult of
the Christ of Pachacamilla, Nahua Christians brought indigenous elements
to bear on the emerging New World Christianity. These indigenous aspects
enabled the friars to continue defining Nahua Christians as "them" in con-
trast to the European "us." But these aspects also helped the Nahua to ar-
ticulate their own distinctive identity and to exert considerable control over
their religious and cultural practices, sometimes including active resistance
to clerical intervention (p. 375). Burkhart concludes, "Through their pious
words and pious performances, the Nahuas actively represented them-
selves as Christians while retaining many of the moods, movements, and
media that had constituted their traditional religiosity" (p. 378).
Language, like religion, was a tool of both dominator and dominated.
In "A Nation Surrounded," Bruce Mannheim observes that the Europeans
were not the first to build an empire in the Americas. The Inkas, like the
Aztecs, dominated a wide variety of ethnic groups. Yet unlike the Spaniards,
the Inkas did not try to impose linguistic and religious uniformity on their
subjects. Their empire was "a mosaic in which speakers of distinct and often
unrelated languages lived cheek to jowl" (p. 384). Only after the Spanish
conquest was Quechua standardized and, along with Aymara, made into
the dominant language of indigenous Andeans. Colonization reduced but
did not eliminate indigenous heterogeneity, and Andean cultural forms,
especially textiles, continue to show the incompleteness of "blending" be-
tween European and native cultures but also among different indigenous
groups.
Frances Karttunen's "Indigenous Writing as a Vehicle of Postconquest
Continuity and Change in Mesoamerica" reiterates several major themes of
Native Traditions as a whole. She examines the ways that both colonizers and
colonized used colonial institutions, especially writing, as their own devices,
albeit in circumstances that were painfully constrained for the colonized.
Karttunen concentrates on the persistence of some pre-Columbian themes
and forms of native writing into the colonial and postcolonial periods. Like
other cultural forms, native writing in the postcontact era sometimes broke
With the preexisting indigenous culture but also continued and sometimes
even enhanced native traditions and forms, in and through a "covert folk
tradition" threading through the "overt professional tradition" (p. 434). Kart-
249
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American Research Review
tunen emphasizes, however, that scholars should not identify "the folk tra-
dition" as an unchanging remnant of archaic indigenous culture. Both overt
and covert forms changed continually through the colonial and postcolonial
periods. This change continues today in current Maya and Nahua writing
and performance, which Karttunen discusses briefly.
Contributors to Native Traditions in the Postconquest World repeatedly
emphasize the creativity and persistence of native peoples in the colonial
period, their capacity to use and transform European traditions while pre-
serving their own. Tom Cummins highlights these issues in his "Synthetic
Comments" at the end of the volume, but he also describes the conquest as
"a catastrophe," "the beginning of the violent end" of indigenous cultures
in the Americas (p. 450). This point is important because as the pendulum
of scholarly work on the indigenous Americas swings away from visions of
passive natives waiting to be discovered and toward affirmation of native
resilience and resistance, the danger exists that the capacity of the colonized
to retain some degree of agency might overshadow their overwhelming
losses. In reflecting on native agency, Cummins points out that many con-
tributors emphasize the centrality of texts, including visual images and rit-
uals, as means for preserving and interpreting indigenous traditions. Colo-
nizers attempt to substitute and replace their forms for indigenous ones, but
this effort is never complete, as the Christ of Pachacamilla, the festival of
Corpus Christi, and numerous other examples make clear. This incomplete-
ness extends to contemporary scholarly efforts to understand the postcon-
quest world. Cummins cites the "growing variety of approaches and aims
in Latin American colonial studies" that make the field both richer and more
controversial as it develops (p. 459). In the end, this variety is necessary to
understand the complexity and ambiguities of the post-Columbian world,
for "there cannot be an essentialist or master text that governs the study of
colonial Latin America as a universal explanatory model" (p. 453).
Or can there? David Wilson believes that a single model can explicate
not only colonial but also precolonial and postcolonial indigenous cultures.
In Indigenous South Americans of the Past and Present: An Ecological Perspective,
Wilson begins to construct a "grand unifying theory for anthropology" (p. xv).
He also expresses an empirical aim: to provide "an updated, continentwide
treatment of indigenous South American cultures that includes consistent
reference to the sociocultural and archaeological information we now have
at hand for the groups that have inhabited the different geographic areas of
the continent" (p. 7). Combining several different models, Wilson proposes
a "systems-hierarchical evolutionary paradigm" as the most capable of in-
terpreting and ordering vast amounts of information, in contrast to the frag-
mentation and specialization of much current ethnography.
Wilson draws especially on the work of Julian Steward, coauthor of
Native Peoples of South America (1959), the last wide-ranging handbook of
contemporary as well as ancient South American native cultures. Wilson aims
250
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEW ESSAYS
251
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American Research Review
An Annotated Bibliography
252
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEW ESSAYS
since their first encounters with the Europeans after 1492" (p. 1). The forms
of domination included the most obvious, such as slavery, the encomienda,
and capture in war as well as somewhat more subtle practices such as trade,
missions, and diplomacy. Magnaghi also covers forms of resistance to these
different institutions, including recent pan-indigenous movements as well
as earlier events such as slave uprisings.
The bibliography is mostly organized by period and country or region
(for the Andes, the Caribbean, and subregions within the United States).
There are also relatively short sections for general sources, the European
origins of colonization, and "theory and legal aspects." While a significant
proportion of the listings are for the United States and Canada, Latin Amer-
icanists will discover much of value. Perhaps even more important, they
will not have to struggle to find it. The sections are logically organized and
clearly marked. This reference work will be helpful for both specialists and
undergraduates seeking a few quick references. Some of the longer sections,
such as that on the colonial Caribbean covering over 20 pages and nearly 150
entries, might have benefited from more specific subheadings.
The annotations are short and to the point, for example, "a study of
the mita in the mining center of Potosi" (p. 116). Magnaghi does not repeat
material in the title of a book or article but uses the annotations to fill in de-
tails that are not obvious. Thus he sometimes indicates that a work only
"mentions" a topic such as Indian captivity or the slave trade, providing
help for scholars sifting through the potentially overwhelming lists. Some-
times the descriptions are invaluable, as when the title gives little or no in-
formation, or when a document is rare and accessible to most scholars only
through interlibrary loans, for which they need all the bibliographic infor-
mation in advance. Because space precludes listing more than brief and
nonevaluative descriptions and an occasional insightful or important, users
of the bibliography will have to do a lot of preliminary reading to deter-
mine the quality and relevance of a given item. The volume will be very
helpful, however, for locating sources not in an individual user's library
stacks and pointing out references hidden in broader or apparently unre-
lated topics. Given the growing scholarly interest in indigenous traditions,
colonial domination, and diverse forms of resistance, the bibliography will
be invaluable to specialists and students in a range of fields.
The books reviewed here reflect the broad range of themes and theo-
ries that preoccupy contemporary scholars of indigenous cultures in the
Americas. They vary in focus-from the solitary figure of Quetzalcoatl to
all native South Americans-and also in approach, where the most striking
difference is found between Wilson's book on the one hand and Dean's and
the Boone and Cummins volume on the other. Even the books that propose
encompassing theories, as Wilson's does, face inevitable limits-and even
those that acknowledge their limits embody clear arguments for particular
253
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American Research Review
ways of interpreting culture and history. The differences among the books
do not make any of them necessarily less helpful. The moral of the different
stories might ultimately be the value of methodological and theoretical plural-
ism in trying to piece together the diverse, complex, and never transparent
experiences of indigenous cultures in America.
254
This content downloaded from 128.227.229.73 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:50:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms