Lecture 4
Lecture 4
Non-realistic expectations in the future evolution of technologies and lack of insight in unexpected influences
Creation
of new
A company needs sufficient resources, capable and
Ideas suitable personnel for correct management of innovation
in order to enhance its capacity for innovation.
Re-design
of
Any organization, of any size, could be divided in a series
Production of procedures. The first group of procedures refers to a
processes
business’s strategic activities (strategic procedures), while
the second group underlies all these activities involving
customers directly (basic procedures). The third group of
Knowledge
Management procedures, supporting the other two, takes into account
the suppliers (support procedures)
Products
development
Re-design
of market
processes
4.2 What is the Management of Technological Innovation and Why Is It Important
If done in the wrong way, the companies may face serious and probably
determining problems by losing money, employees and reputation.
Companies compete successfully when they offer new, better or/and more
cost-effective products and services that can be used by customers for
their benefit and that they cannot be offered by competitors.
Padayon,
GHAIL Z. MACUTONG
CHAPTER 4.2.1
Innovation Management
Techniques (IMTs)
A Corporate Perspective
• The Management of Technological Innovation is
important for the growth, effectiveness and survival
of companies.
• History is teeming with examples of enterprises that
were not able to survive because they failed to abide
by innovation’s requirements.
• Each of the sectors of Technological Innovation
Management is significant but some are critical for
specific companies.
• It is Research and Development that offers the
opportunities to create separately new products and
markets.
• Boldness as regards the processes enables
companies, such as Toyota to produce better and
cheaper cars compared to their competitors and
allows companies of electronics, such as Acer in
Taiwan to effectively produce for important
customers in the USA, Europe and Japan.
• Enterprises usually fail to acquire value from
their technological innovations.
• The effectiveness and the quality of
commercialization process determine the
outcome of technological innovation.
• Out of all aspects of Technological Innovation
Management, the innovation strategy was the most
demanding. Very few enterprises are steadily in a
position to develop and apply innovation strategies.
The adoption of dominant positions in technology
could offer a significant competitive advantage.
• At the same time, leaders may fail to capitalize on
new ideas, allowing product innovation fans, such as
Dell to succeed. Companies in the same industry
follow different strategies, based on their resources,
abilities and ambitions.
• When these strategies are correct, the significant
benefits increase.
• For example, the Italian clothing company
Benetton and the Spanish company Zara have
been particularly effective in integrating
innovation in their products, processes, marketing
and sales, being thus able to achieve their
competitive targets, i.e. fast delivery of fashion
products being constantly changing to the
market.
A National Perspective
• The possibility to manage innovation impacts at
national, regional and local level because it
affects the levels of employment
• The globalization of production and markets,
along with the increased use of digital
communications and services have driven to a
significant restructuring of entire economies
and of the ways innovation processes are
regulated at local and international scale.
A Theoretical Perspective-Evolutionary
Economy
• The empirical conclusions on the effect of
technological innovation are enhanced by new
theoretical approaches that unveil the significance of
innovation, evolutionary economic and new or
inherent growth theory.
• Evolutionary economics view capitalism as a system
that constantly creates variety of ideas, companies
and technologies created by entrepreneurs and
innovative activities of large research groups (Nelson
and Winter 1982 ; Dosi 1988 ; Nelson 1995 ).
Decisions lead to choices out of this variety regarding
companies, consumers and governments.
• Economic development is a very complex process
involving many constituents, in open systems,
with unpredictable outcomes. Innovation yields
profit, but also brings about a structural change
(Schumpeter’ creative destruction), uncertainty
and ‘useless’ investments.
• The importance of evolutionary economics in the
Management of Technological Innovation lies in
the way it helps to explain the primary
importance of innovation
• Emphasis is placed on the central paradox of
innovation: it is substantial, however continuously
problematic.
Significant Characteristics of the New
Growth Theory
• Technology is ‘endogenous’-a central part of the
economic system, a key factor of production along
with capital and work.
• Traditional neoclassical economic theories view
technology as an ‘exogenous’ factor in explaining
economic growth.
• On the contrary, the new growth theory supports
that technology is a signifi cant ‘endogenous’ factor
that explains the growth and the understanding of
the necessity of the way technology fl ows among
companies and industries
An Individual Perspective
• The contribution to society by advanced and recent innovators,
such as Edison, Marconi, Steve Jobs in Apple and Bill Gates in
Microsoft, is well known. Innovations, however, do not simply
arise through the heroic efforts of some persons. They usually
arise from combined activities of human groups and
organizations that build on the other’s knowledge and
experience. The work undertaken may mostly result in ‘99 % of
Edison’s toil from 1 % of his inspiration’ and indeed, occasionally
it may be, as Nathan Rosenberg ( 1976) put it, ‘polluting and
uninspiring’.
• Innovation is though the result of the application of innate
human inventiveness and wit.
• Creativity is something that we are all capable of and the
application of innovation capacity constitutes a source of
enthusiasm, challenge, satisfaction and happiness.
CHAPTER 4.3 CHAPTER 4.4
Challenges in Case Study in Technological
Technological Innovation Innovation Management
Management
4.3 Challenges in technological innovation
management
The more innovation activity focus shifts from the simple
incremental improvement towards demanding changes and the
higher the number participating in it’s creation, the more
technological involves the effort to manage something complex and
hazardous. Complexity is a characteristics of system having multiple
contributors and unexpected outcome. The integral of the above
complex system is a key objective of technological innovation
management.
Some of these complex system have been described as a
particular form of industrial production requiring different
administrative approaches. Therefore, for complex product and
system there are special demand in the design, program
management, applied
engineering and integration system. (Brusoni et al. 2001)
Risk level are determined by various
factors, including the degree in which
innovation results are unpredictable, costly and
non-assignable. With the high degree of risk
and uncertainty of investment in technological
innovation and very high investment levels
therein, huge pressure is placed on companies
worldwide to cut the expenses of technological
innovation or obtain higher revenue therefrom.
There are challenges linked to all the method used
to ensure desired revenue from investment in innovation,
such as whether for example intellectual property
protection is subsidized and can be preserved, or
whether secret can be kept. An additional estimate is the
issue of speed: how fast can innovation be protected and
returns be incurred? New markets can develop very
quickly, based on the new technology. In such swiftly
evolving environments many challenges arise for many
companies and opportunities for others.
Whether it has to do with the development or with
the improvement of new products, processes and service,
the management of technological innovation requires the
organizational capacity to learn fast and move
quickly when issues of competition arise.
4.4 Case Study in Technological Innovation
Management
Some of the issues and the common
problem faced in the management of
technological innovation are briefly presented in
the following short case studies, being complex
descriptions of actual businesses and placing
emphasis on the opportunities and the issues
such are facing.
• 4.4.1 Biotechnology Company
Companies were initially expected to follow
the model of information technology industry and
reproduce the remarkable growth of companies such as
Apple, Intel and Microsoft.
Sidmuth Genes Technology (SGT) is an
example of an American biotechnology company that
seeks the optimal way to obtain value from it’s
intellectual property. SGT started from two scientists,
Elaine Wiessman and Peter Georgiou a capital investor,
Jenny Kupper, on the basis of a scientific discovery with
tow possible market application. Laboratory test proved
very contribute to overcoming
liver cancer, a disease of a multi-million dollar
market in USA.
They include the management of regulatory process
required to first protect and then develop its discovery. The
company patented its discovery (being the basis of Jenny Kuper
initial investment) but there were various technical aspects
associated with the important discovery that were not fully
patented.
Second problem faced by SGT was the time span and the
money required to gain the approval for a new drug development.
SGT could not afford to proceed through the drug approval
regulatory process, nor attempt to develop the marketing and
distribution effort required to launch its product in the market.
Following a long discussion and with some
reluctance, it forged a stragitic alliance with an
important American pharmaceutical industry, receiving
in exchange a high investment capital for all the right of
the developed product.
The two scientis instead of conducting a research,
spend their time in communication with the regulation-
related organizations; they work on patent right
infridement and woth the drug approval process of the
American Food and Drug Administration; they execute
stereotypical procedures to improve the company’s
financials and manage the cumbersome and
demanding relations with associated large
pharmacueticals.
The enterprise has important decision to
make for its future. The enterprise needs to
decide whether it shall continue financing its
own expensive research to develop a series of
new product, or whether it shall become
ambitious and try to develop and
commercialize
its products, probably in cooperation
With other companies.
CHAPTER 4.5
Innovation Management
Techniques (IMTs)
Innovation Management Techniques (IMTs)
S – STRENGTH
W – WEAKNESS
O – OPPORTUNITIES
T – THREATS
• SWOT analysis is a business tool by which, a firm
wishing to implement a strategic analysis,
analyses and recognizes its corporate Strengths
and Weaknesses as well as the existed or
forthcoming Opportunities and Threats from its
external environment.
• The role of SWOT analysis is to take the
information from the environmental analysis.
• REMEMBER!
• S and W are INTERNAL
• O and T are External.
• SWOT analysis is an extremely useful tool for
understanding and decision making for all
sorts of situations in business and
organizations.
• By creating a SWOT analysis, you can see all
the important factors affecting your
business together in one place. It’s easy to
create, easy to read, and easy to
communicate.
A company can use the SWOT analysis:
• While developing a strategic plan or planning
a solution to a problem.
• In order to develop a plan that takes into
consideration many different internal and
external factors, and maximizes the potential
of the strengths and opportunities while
minimizing the impact of the weaknesses and
threats.
SWOT Analysis Framework
ACTION CHECKLIST
Tips for successful SWOT analysis