Babylon
Babylon
Mathematics of
Ancient
Mesopotamia
Background
• Mesopotamia: Greek ,
“between the rivers,” specifically the
Tigris and Euphrates. This area
occupies most of what is present-day
Iraq, and parts of Syria, Turkey,
Lebanon, and Iran.
Background
• Thought to be the (or at least a)
“cradle of civilization.”
• Delta region extremely fertile – The
“Fertile Crescent”
• Semi-arid climate required extensive
irrigation projects
Four Empires
• Four civilizations flourished here, from
3100 BCE to 539 BCE. These included the
early Sumerian (3100 – 2400 BCE) and
Akkadian (2400-2100 BCE) empires, and
the later Old Babylonian (1800-1200 BCE)
and Assyrian (1200 -612 BCE;
Ashurbanipal) empires. There followed a
brief Neo-Babylonian period from 612 –
539 BCE. Then Persia. Then Alexander
the Great. Then….
Timeline
3000 BCE 2500 BCE 2000 BCE 1500 BCE 1000 BCE
or 41,663.
The First of Two Problems
• There was no “0” or placeholder so
we really can’t be sure which power of
60 is being used. Thus, ‹˅˅ ˅˅‹ could
represent either:
, or
ଶ
, or
ଶ
, or many other
possibilities.
The Second of Two
Problems
• Even though the Babylonians used this
system to write fractions as sexagecimals,
there was no “sexagecimal point” or other
way of marking where the fractional part
began. So, again, ‹˅˅ ˅˅‹ could mean any
of:
, or
ିଵ
, or
ିଵ ିଶ
Resolution of Problems
• These two problems were usually
quite easily resolved by the context of
the arithmetic being done, so it
bothers us much more than it did the
Babylonians. Also, there were very
frequently units attached. For
example, any ambiguity in writing
1 1 is resolved if we say $1 1₵.
Resolution of Problems
• In about 300 BC there was a
placeholder symbol invented and
used, but only between symbols,
never at the end.
• In our notation, it
used for 604 but
never 640 or
6400.
Our Babylonian Notation
• We will use a comma to separate
place values, use a 0 when we need
it, and use a semicolon as a
“sexagecimal point.” Thus,
ଵ
But Why 60? Why? Why?
Some suggested reasons:
• Lots of non-repeating sexagecimals,
since 60 as more divisors than 10
(btw, how do you tell if one of our
fractions will terminate or repeat when
converted to a decimal?).
• Sacred or Mystical numbers
• Combination of two number cultures.
Why 60?
• Well, actually, we aren’t sure.
• But we’ll talk about one suggested
solution.
• According to Peter Rudman in his
book How Mathematics Happened:
The First 50,000 Years, it’s probably
more like 6’s and 10’s than 60.
Example:
60x60 60 1 1/60
(carrying row) ٧ ‹ ٧ ‹
(Sum) ‹‹ ٧٧ ‹‹ ٧٧٧٧ ‹‹ ٧
60x60 60 1 1/60
(carrying row) ٧ ‹ ٧ ‹
(Sum) ٧
60x60 60 1 1/60
(carrying row) ٧ ‹ ٧ ‹
(Sum) ‹‹ ٧
60x60 60 1 1/60
(carrying row) ٧ ‹ ٧ ‹
(Sum) ٧٧٧٧ ‹‹ ٧
60x60 60 1 1/60
(carrying row) ٧ ‹ ٧ ‹
(Sum) ‹‹ ٧٧٧٧ ‹‹ ٧
60x60 60 1 1/60
(carrying row) ‹ ٧ ‹ ٧ ‹
(Sum) ٧٧ ‹‹ ٧٧٧٧ ‹‹ ٧
60x60 60 1 1/60
(carrying row) ‹ ٧ ‹ ٧ ‹
• 17, 9 by 0; 0, 56,15
0; 0, 56, 15
x 17, 9
2, 15 9 x 15 from table
7, 30 9 x 50 from table; shift
54 9 x 6 from table; shift
4, 15, 17 x 15 from table; shift
14, 10, 17 x 50 from table; shift2
1, 42, 17 x 6 from table; shift2
16; 4, 41, 15
Or in our system, 16.078125
What About Division by 7?
ଵ
• As a Babylonian scribe would say, “7 does
not divide.”
• So, they used an approximation:
ଵ
ଵ ଵ ଵ
ଵଷ ଽଵ ଽଵ ଽ
ଵ
( )
ଵଷ
Story Problems, 1
• I have added the area and two-thirds
of [ the side of ] my square and it is
0;35. What is the side of my square?
ଶ
we now subtract
the 0;20 to find x.
Story Problems, 2
(2/3)(2/3)x+100=x
• First multiply two-thirds by two thirds:
result 0;26,40
• Subtract 0;26,40 from 1: result
0;33,20
• Take the reciprocal of 0;33,20: result
1;48
• Multiply 1;48 by 1,40: result 3,00.
• 3,00 (qa) is the original quantity.
Story Problems, 3
• I found a stone but did not weigh it.
After I weighed out 8 times its weight,
added 3 gin. [Then] one-third of one-
thirteenth I multiplied by 21, added it
and then I weighed it. Result 1 mana.
What was the original weight of the
stone?
• The weight was 4;30 gin. (1 mana =
60 gin).
Babylonian “Algebra”
• Whether or not their “algebra” was
geometric or not, they were skilled in
solving quadratic equations. We
should note, however, that
– All quantities were positive
– Problems were often given in terms of
areas and perimeters of rectangles
Some Geometry-YBC 7289
Error: 0.000000423847 ish
30