ChPP Application Guidance
ChPP Application Guidance
Professional (ChPP)
Application Guidance
Helping you to understand, decide and prepare for
the Chartered Project Professional (ChPP) standard
Becoming a Chartered Project Professional (ChPP) will demonstrate
your commitment to professional standards, continued professional
development and ethical and professional conduct. It will provide
assurance for your employer and clients and help raise the profile
and value of project management as a professional practice.
This guidance will help you to decide when the time is right for
you to apply and will help you to prepare for an application now
or at a future date.
Contents
Page 3 Introduction
Page 4 Why become chartered?
Page 4 Are you ready for chartered?
Page 6 The application process
Page 9 Helping you to prepare
Page 13 The interview
Page 15 Other things to note
Page 18 Appendix 1 – Professional practice
assessment criteria
Page 35 Appendix 2 – Technical knowledge
assessment criteria
Understand what being chartered means for you and the profession.
If you are successful, you will join the Register of Chartered Project Professionals.
The chartered standard has been designed to be accessible, yet rigorous with different
assessment routes according to qualifications, previous assessments and experience.
You have the required breadth of project experience to meet the requirements of ten
mandatory and two elective competences.
You have an advanced technical knowledge and are able to confidently evaluate and
analyse theory of current practices and methods.
a) having a proven track record delivering projects, programmes, portfolios or a key control
or enabling function; and
Technical knowledge
b) having up-to-date knowledge of current practices and methods; and
means: an advanced
c) being actively involved in the project management profession. technical knowledge and
understanding of how to
deliver projects, programmes
to complete a currency statement which explains how you continue to meet points b) and c) and portfolios. You could
above. think about this as the theory.
There is more detail later on in these guidance notes about the competences that support Professional practice
means: being able to provide
these areas. You will need to show:
evidence of applying the
Technical knowledge: advanced technical knowledge and understanding of how to technical knowledge (theory)
deliver projects, programmes or portfolios taking into account many interacting factors to practice. You could think
and different approaches that could be taken. about this as experience.
You will need to commit to professional ethics and show continuing professional
development (CPD). You will also need two proposers who support your application.
For the full details of competences that will be assessed, please see Appendices 1 and 2.
The next section tells you how to provide the evidence required.
There are three routes and the online application process will guide you through according to
whether you have a recognised assessment and what it covers.
Route 1: for those who have a recognised assessment for technical knowledge.
Route 2: for those who have a recognised assessment for technical knowledge and
professional practice.
Route 3: an experiential route for those who do not have a recognised assessment but do
meet the eligibility criteria.
The next step is where you The next step is where you
provide evidence of professional provide evidence of professional
practice. practice.
There are three steps to this part: There are three steps to this part:
Your application will be assessed at this stage, and if successful you will be invited to interview.
* All interviews will be carried out safely and in accordance with government guidance for
Covid-19 safety procedures.
*Can’t see your assessment listed? Don’t worry, you can still apply
through the experiential route and provide evidence through the
written submission and interview.*
The form has help available as you go but if this doesn’t answer your question, you can contact
the chartered team.
Personal information
You are asked to provide some basic personal information such as any professional memberships
and your employer (if applicable). We respect your information and will only use it in accordance
with data protection rules and our privacy policy; this is available on request and via the online
link when you register.
Recognised assessments
Select any recognised assessments from the drop-down list. This will determine the next steps
If your most recent
assessment is more than
next. If you don’t have a recognised assessment you will go to the written submission stage and
five years old you will need
technical knowledge will be tested at interview.
to provide a statement
showing how you have kept
up to date with current
The current list of recognised assessments can be found here:
practice and methods and
apm.org.uk/recognisedassessment.
been actively involved in
If you have an assessment that covers both technical knowledge and professional the project management
practice, you can skip the next section and go straight to the section on continuing profession.
professional development.
You will be expected to write up to 500 words for each project overview.
Complexity is exhibited
through demonstration
of all the characteristics
required in your project
experience.
You will need to have completed 35 hours of CPD in the 12 months up to your application and
CPD: Things you might confirm that you will maintain this every year. All CPD must meet the requirements of APM’s
want to consider could CPD scheme which can be found here: apm.org.uk/cpd.
include: work-based
learning; distance learning;
special work projects,
writing technical papers; CPD
mentoring; voluntary work; You will either have to upload your record or self-declare (see section above on the
association activities or application process)
committee work; promoting
project management to APM will do an annual audit of a sample of ChPP CPD records.
young people; seminar/
conference presentations; You can use the APM CPD log, but this is not mandatory provided you meet the necessary
any relevant course or requirements detailed in APM's CPD scheme. Your submission should include a statement on
private study. the areas you would like to develop further over the next 12 months.
Your proposers
You must provide contact details for two proposers who can support your application.
Proposers could be another project professional or your line manager but can’t be a family
member.
Your proposers should believe you are suitable for consideration for ChPP and be happy to
confirm this if contacted by APM.
You will also be asked if, subject to your application being successful, you would like your name
to be published on the APM website.
Interviews may be recorded or observed for quality assurance purposes with the applicant’s
permission.
The interviewers will make their judgements based solely on the information in your application
and your performance during the interview.
Keep a copy of your
Interviewers are experienced assessors and understand the requirements and criteria for ChPP.
application for your records
You will each be told one another’s names in advance of the interview to identify and prevent
and to review before the
any conflicts of interest. They won’t necessarily be matched to your market sector or area
interview stage. There is
of expertise, but will give a very brief introduction of themselves for your benefit before the
an ‘export to PDF’ link on
interview.
each page of the online
Interview format application form.
The interview format will take the form of a discussion. There are no trick questions and you
should structure your responses to questions using ‘I’ not ‘we’ or ‘the team’. The interviewers
will be seeking to understand your evidence.
A copy of your written
Route 1 interviews submission and brief notes
are permitted during the
Your interview will be conducted by two assessors and the purpose of the interview is to interview. These are to be
explore and validate your written submission. You are expected to provide detailed and used as a memory-aid and
specific answers about actual events relating to evidence in your application. You will be asked: should not be read from
verbatim.
clarification questions on your project overviews (if applicable);
questions on six competence areas from your written submission (these areas are chosen
by the assessors);
questions on ethics;
finally, if you have any additional evidence you would like to add to support your
application – you have up to five minutes to provide this.
questions on how the CPD you have undertaken relates to a selection of mandatory
competences and/or examples, within the past five years, where you have used a selection
of mandatory competences within your project management related activity;
questions on ethics;
finally, if you have any additional evidence you would like to add to support your
application – you have up to five minutes to provide this.
Route 3 interviews
Your interview will be conducted by two assessors and the purpose of the interview is to
explore and validate your written submission as well as assess technical knowledge. You are
expected to provide detailed and specific answers about actual events relating to evidence
in your application with regards to professional practice. The technical knowledge
questions are designed to assess your breadth of knowledge against the criteria (available
in Appendix 2). Answers to these questions do not specifically have to relate to your own
experience. You will be asked:
questions on six competence areas from your written submission in relation to professional
practice(these areas are chosen by the assessors);
questions on four competence areas from your written submission in relation to technical
knowledge(these areas are chosen by the assessors);
questions on ethics;
finally, if you have any additional evidence you would like to add to support your
application – you have up to five minutes to provide this.
If you are successful, you will receive a letter and a certificate from APM confirming
your achievement within eight weeks from the results release date. Your name will be
included on the Register of Chartered Project Professionals.
Your name will be published on the APM website if you have given permission for us
to do so.
If your application is not successful, we will write to you and explain the reason for the
decision. You will be given feedback and guidance to help you to resubmit.
If unsuccessful at interview, we will write to you and explain the reason for the
decision. You will be given feedback and guidance to help you repeat the required
process. If unsuccessful at interview against the professional practice criteria then you
will have to start the application process again, including your written submission..
There are other support services available by third parties, please note these have not been
endorsed by APM.
0 = less than 2 assessment criteria provisionally achieved across the chartered competence
2 = at least 4 of the assessment criteria provisionally achieved across the chartered competence
Route 2
Route 1 No scores provided Route 3
must successfully
meet the criteria at
interview
Demonstrated your N/A Demonstrated your personal
personal responsibility responsibility and accountability
and accountability
Met criteria of fulfilling the 4
Met criteria of fulfilling characteristics
Stage 1: Project the 4 characteristics
If unsuccessful the competence
Written overview If unsuccessful the which the project relates to will score
submission competence which the a0
project relates to will
If more than one project is referred
score a 0
to within a competence, the relevant
If more than one project competence will score a 0
is referred to within
a competence, the
relevant competence
will score a 0
Professional Practice N/A Professional Practice score a
score a minimum of 20 minimum of 20
Competence Must not score a 0 Must not score a 0 against any
against any competence competence areas
areas
Professional Practice: Professionally Professional Practice: Score 22 or
Score 22 or more active (where more across the six competences
across the six applicable) assessed at interview and the six
Stage 2: Interview
competences assessed remaining competence scores taken
CPD
at interview and the six from your written submission
remaining competence Currency
Technical Knowledge: Score 8 -
scores taken from your
Ethics must achieve a score of 2 for each
written submission
of the four technical knowledge
Ethics: Successfully competences assessed.
meet the criteria
Ethics: Successfully meet the criteria
Must not score a 0
Must not score a 0 against any
against any competence
competence area
area
1b Financial You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
management assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
PP1.1 adopt a consistent approach to the investment appraisal instance, you could, for example,
of a programme or portfolio in line with organisational provide examples from one of
practice the programmes or portfolios
within your project experience,
PP1.2 ensure a consistent approach to estimating is used
and explain how you ensured a
across the programme or portfolio
consistent approach to estimating
PP1.3 establish control limits for the reporting and approval of across the programme or
budget variances portfolio, established control limits
PP1.4 establish arrangements for the release of funds at for the reporting and approval
appropriate stages in a programme or portfolio of budget variances, established
PP2.1 determine capital and revenue expenditure for a financial reporting milestones and
programme or portfolio ensuring alignment with the reviews, and adjusted the financial
organisation’s financial plan plan based on the progress of
a programme or portfolio and
PP2.2 establish financial reporting milestones and reviews for a
associated financial reviews.
programme or portfolio
PP2.3 produce financial progress reports based on the financial
information related to a programme or portfolio
PP2.4 adjust a financial plan based on the progress of a
programme or portfolio and associated financial reviews
3 Conflict You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
management assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
PP1.1 take a proactive approach to identify and address instance, you could, for example,
potential conflict situations which may impact on a provide examples from one of
project the projects within your project
experience, and explain how
PP1.2 take an impartial approach to investigating the cause of
you took a proactive approach
conflict
to identify and address potential
PP1.3 evaluate and implement conflict management measures conflict situations which may
including the role of colleagues and specialists have impacted on your project,
PP1.4 monitor the extent to which conflict management evaluated and implemented
measures are successful conflict management measures
PP2.1 support others to resolve conflict including the role of colleagues
and specialists, supported others
PP2.2 respond appropriately and promptly to conflict situations
to resolve conflict, and resolved
where intervention is required
conflict giving due respect to the
PP2.3 resolve conflict giving due respect to the views, opinions views, opinions and concerns of
and concerns of all parties all parties.
5 Governance You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
arrangements assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this instance,
PP1.1 define reporting, decision-making hierarchies and levels you could, provide examples from
of authority for a project one of the projects
within your project experience,
PP1.2 establish the relationship between a project’s
and explain how you defined
governance and the organisation’s governance
reporting, decision-making
structures
hierarchies and levels of authority
PP1.3 design the project governance structure taking into for the project, designed the
account context, complexity and potential impact project governance structure
PP2.1 ensure clarity of ownership and levels of authority by taking into account context,
agreeing the responsibilities and accountabilities with complexity and potential impact,
relevant individuals ensured clarity of ownership and
PP2.2 ensure effective reporting and decision making levels of authority by agreeing the
through maintained governance structures, staffing and responsibilities and accountabilities
maintenance of approved reporting and decision making with relevant individuals, and
ensured effective reporting and
decision making throughout.
7 Reviews You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
PP1.1 consider factors which need to be evaluated during a instance, you could, for example,
review provide examples from one of
the projects within your project
PP1.2 establish and implement a schedule of reviews
experience, and explain how you
incorporating key milestones during and after a project
considered factors which needed
PP1.3 obtain appropriate information from valid sources to to be evaluated during a review,
inform the review obtained appropriate information
PP2.1 maintain records of any deviations from plans to include from valid sources to inform
reasons for and responses to the deviations the review, communicated the
PP2.2 communicate the outcomes of reviews to relevant outcomes of reviews to relevant
stakeholders stakeholders, and implemented
agreed actions and updated the
PP2.3 confirm stakeholder understanding and acceptance of
lessons learned log.
proposed actions
PP2.4 implement agreed actions and update lessons learned
log
9 Stakeholder and You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
communications assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
management PP1.1 determine stakeholder interests, requirements and instance, you could, for example,
levels of influence for a project provide examples from one of
the projects within your project
PP1.2 produce stakeholder management and communication
experience, and explain how
plans
you determined stakeholder
PP1.3 monitor the effectiveness of stakeholder management interests, requirements and
and communication plans levels of influence for a project,
PP1.4 adjust stakeholder management and communication monitored the effectiveness of
plans to respond to any changing needs of a project stakeholder management and
PP2.1 employ relevant communication methods and media to communication plans, employed
meet stakeholder requirements and expectations relevant communication methods
and media to meet stakeholder
PP2.2 disseminate clear, timely and relevant information to
requirements and expectations
stakeholders
and disseminated clear, timely
PP2.3 obtain, and respond to, feedback from stakeholders and relevant information to
which may have an impact on a project stakeholders.
14 Capability You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
development assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
PP1.1 conduct a skills analysis on individuals within an instance, you could, for example,
organisation to identify gaps in competences required to provide examples from one of
deliver a successful project the programmes or portfolios
within your project experience,
PP1.2 develop a training and development strategy in relation to
and explain how you conducted a
project management
skills analysis on individuals within
PP1.3 implement a training and development strategy in relation the organisation to identify gaps in
to project management competences required to deliver a
PP2.1 use tools and techniques to determine an organisation’s successful project, implemented a
capability to support a project training and development strategy
PP2.2 apply relevant competency models to an organisation’s in relation to project management,
workforce in relation to project management applied relevant competency
models to the organisation’s
PP2.3 monitor and evaluate organisational learning against
workforce in relation to project
objectives
management, and monitored and
evaluated organisational learning
against objectives.
16 Frameworks and You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
methodologies assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
PP1.1 analyse potential frameworks/methodologies for the instance, you could, for example,
management of projects provide examples from one
of the projects within your
PP1.2 determine internal and external contexts which could
project experience, and explain
affect the use of a framework/methodology
how you analysed potential
PP1.3 identify the underlying framework/methodology frameworks/methodologies for
principles that will suit the management of projects within the management of the project,
the organisation determined the internal and
PP2.1 define the processes, standards and guidelines to external contexts which could
implement the framework and/or methodology over affect the use of a framework/
the lifecycle of projects, adopting these from existing methodology, defined the
sources, or developing them as required. processes, standards and
PP2.2 reflect on the strengths and limitations of a framework/ guidelines to implement the
methodology making refinements as required based on framework and/or methodology
experience over the lifecycle of projects,
adopting these from existing
sources, or developing them as
required, and reflected on the
strengths and limitations of a
framework/methodology
18 Procurement You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
PP1.1 establish the type, quality and quantity of the resource instance, you could, for example,
requirement provide examples from one of
the projects within your project
PP1.2 develop detailed specifications for the procurement of
experience, and explain how
resources for a project
you established the type, quality
PP1.3 evaluate technical and commercial options for fulfilling the and quantity of the resource
requirements requirement, developed detailed
PP1.4 agree a procurement plan with relevant stakeholders specifications for the procurement
PP2.1 negotiate and secure internal resources to effectively of resources for the project,
deliver a project agreed a procurement plan with
relevant stakeholders, and agreed
PP2.2 comply with organisational procedures when selecting and
viable contracts and statements
negotiating with suppliers based on a rigorous tendering
of work in line with organisational
process
requirements.
PP2.3 agrees viable contracts and statements of work in line
with organisational requirements
23 Schedule You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
management assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
PP1.1 define, in appropriate detail, activities and events to be instance, you could, for example,
completed during a project provide examples from one of
the projects within your project
PP1.2 determine relationships and dependencies between
experience, and explain how
activities and events, and their implications to the
you defined, in appropriate
organisation
detail, activities and events to be
PP1.3 develop duration estimates and critical dates for each completed during the project,
activity and event developed duration estimates
PP2.1 accurately document a schedule of phases, milestones and critical dates for each
and review points for a project, sufficient to inform the activity and event, accurately
direction of work and the monitoring of progress documented a schedule of
PP2.2 refines a schedule of activities based on effective phases, milestones and review
monitoring, implementing the change control process points for the project, sufficient to
when required inform the direction of work and
the monitoring of progress, and
refined the schedule of activities
based on effective monitoring,
implementing the change control
process where required.
25 Transition You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the following To meet the minimum four
management assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
PP1.1 determine key staff required to support a transition instance, you could, for
process example, provide examples
from one of the projects within
PP1.2 establish the logistic requirements to support a transition
your project experience, and
process
explain how you determined
PP1.3 determine the knowledge transfer requirements for a key staff required to support the
transition process transition process, established
PP1.4 create a transition plan where priorities, potential the logistic requirements to
disruption and output ownership are key considerations support the transition process,
PP2.1 negotiate with stakeholders to gain agreement on the created a transition plan where
transition process plan priorities, potential disruption
and output ownership were key
PP2.2 negotiate with stakeholders to gain agreement on
considerations, and negotiated
staffing solutions, logistics and knowledge transfer
with stakeholders to gain
requirements
agreement on staffing solutions,
PP2.3 establish a benefit review process to monitor benefits logistics and knowledge transfer
realisation which meets the requirements of relevant requirements.
stakeholders
1b Financial You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
management TK1.1 critically evaluate methods for producing an effective to demonstrate evidence of
investment appraisal to a programme or portfolio your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
TK1.2 evaluate the importance of differing levels of financial
your understanding of project
accountability in a programme or portfolio
management principles. For
TK1.3 analyse sources and impact of estimation bias example, for the first criterion, this
TK2.1 evaluate the importance of aligning the financial plan of a could take the form of explaining
programme or portfolio to an overall financial plan why a certain method could be
TK2.2 analyse the extent to which adjusting a financial plan used over another, demonstrating
would be beneficial to a programme or portfolio and the critical evaluation of methods for
sources required to do this producing an effective investment
appraisal.
3 Conflict You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
management TK1.1 evaluate positive and negative conflict in the context of a to demonstrate evidence of
project your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
TK1.2 critically evaluate the causes of conflict
your understanding of project
TK1.3 analyse ways in which to effectively manage conflict in management principles. For
the context of a project example, for the third criterion,
TK1.4 evaluate the extent to which conflict could be a tool to this could take the form of
improve performance explaining ways that you could
TK2.1 evaluate the methods and techniques which could effectively manage conflict and
be used to manage and resolve conflict including why you might choose these
monitoring their effectiveness approaches over alternatives,
TK2.2 evaluate the importance of objectivity and impartiality demonstrating analysis of ways
when resolving conflict in which to effectively manage
conflict.
7 Reviews You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
TK1.1 critically evaluate a range of factors during reviews, and to demonstrate evidence of
how these vary through the stages of a project your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
TK1.2 critically evaluate the importance of aligning reviews with
your understanding of project
organisational, legal and regulatory requirements
management principles. For
TK1.3 evaluate the validity of various sources of information example, for the first criterion, this
TK2.1 analyse situations, potential or real, where deviations to could take the form of explaining
a plan may occur in the context of a project and how to the range of what you could
determine suitable solutions consider during reviews, and how
TK2.2 critically evaluate the importance of stakeholder you might approach them across
engagement when implementing the outcomes of the different stages of the project,
reviews demonstrating critical evaluation
TK2.3 analyse the importance of managing updates to of the range of factors during
documentation impacted by reviews reviews, and how these vary
through the stages of a project.
9 Stakeholder and You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
communications TK1.1 critically evaluate the importance of stakeholder to demonstrate evidence of
management management and communication in the context of a your knowledge in response
project to questions from the assessor
about your understanding of
TK1.2 critically analyse the methods to identify stakeholders
project management principles.
and analyse their interests, requirements and levels of
For example, for the second
influence
criterion, this could take the
TK1.3 analyse ways in which to effectively engage with form of explaining how you
stakeholders could approach stakeholder
TK2.1 evaluate methods and media used to communicate with identification and analysis
stakeholders and when and why these
TK2.2 evaluate the importance of stakeholder feedback in the methods would be appropriate,
context of a project demonstrating analysis of
methods to identify stakeholders
and their interests, requirements
and levels of influence
12 Benefits You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
management TK1.1 critically evaluate approaches to confirming and to demonstrate evidence of
categorising benefits against strategic objectives your knowledge in response
to questions from the assessor
TK1.2 critically evaluate approaches to establishing measures
about your understanding of
for benefits
project management principles.
TK1.3 critically evaluate approaches to identifying and For example, for the first
recording dependencies between benefits criterion, this could take the
TK2.1 evaluate the significance of a benefits management form of explaining how you
strategy and a benefits realisation plan could approach confirming and
TK2.2 analyse approaches to monitoring the progress of a categorising benefits against
benefits realisation plan strategic objectives, and why you
might choose these approaches
over alternatives, demonstrating
critical evaluation of approaches
to confirming and categorising
benefits against strategic
objectives.
16 Frameworks and You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
methodologies TK1.1 critically evaluate characteristics and limitations of to demonstrate evidence of
different frameworks and methodologies which could your knowledge in response
be used for a project to questions from the assessor
about your understanding of
TK1.2 evaluate approaches to tailoring frameworks and
project management principles.
methodologies
For example, for the first
TK2.1 critically evaluate the sources of information which could criterion, this could take the
inform the selection of an appropriate framework and/or form of explaining frameworks
methodology and methodologies that you
TK2.2 analyse the benefits and costs of prescribing frameworks could use for a project, and what
and methodologies to different aspects of projects characteristics and limitations
these have when implemented,
demonstrating critical evaluation
of characteristics and limitations
of different frameworks and
methodologies which could be
used for a project.
18 Procurement You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
TK1.1 critically evaluate the implication of different to demonstrate evidence of
procurement options your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
TK1.2 evaluate the function of procurement specifications in a
your understanding of project
project
management principles. For
TK1.3 analyse approaches to identifying resources required example, for the first criterion, this
TK2.1 critically evaluate approaches to negotiate internal and could take the form of explaining
external resource approaches that you could use
TK2.2 analyse approaches to selecting suppliers for procurement, why these
TK2.3 critically evaluate the nature and implications of different were chosen over alternatives,
forms of contract and the implication of these,
demonstrating critical evaluation
of the implication of different
procurement options.
20 Requirements You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
management TK1.1 evaluate methods and approaches to investigate and to demonstrate evidence of
select different possible requirements your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
TK1.2 evaluate the importance of engaging with stakeholders
your understanding of project
to inform requirements and confirm the outcomes of
management principles. For
research
example, for the first criterion,
TK2.1 critically evaluate the role of negotiation in confirming this could take the form of
requirements explaining what methods and
TK2.2 analyse the characteristics of well-specified requirements approaches you could use to
investigate and select different
possible requirements, and why
these methods and approaches
might be chosen over alternatives,
demonstrating evaluation of
methods and approaches to
investigate and select different
possible requirements.
22 Resource You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
management TK1.1 analyse different characteristics of resources to demonstrate evidence of
your knowledge in response to
TK1.2 evaluate the role of assumptions in resource planning
questions from the assessor about
TK1.3 analyse methods which could be used to manage your understanding of project
resources used within a project management principles. For
TK2.1 critically evaluate the benefits to a project of constantly example, for the first criterion,
monitoring and refining a resource schedule this could take the form of
TK2.2 analyse the techniques to guide the choice, capture and explaining different resources
analysis of relevant data to effectively monitor resources that you could use in projects
and how they vary, and how you
could use them to meet different
needs, demonstrating analysis
of different characteristics of
resources.
24 Solutions You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
development TK1.1 evaluate possible tools and techniques which could be to demonstrate evidence of
used to identify options to deliver the requirements for a your knowledge in response to
project questions from the assessor about
your understanding of project
TK1.2 evaluate tools and techniques which could be used to
management principles. For
analyse and select options to deliver the requirements
example, for the first criterion, this
for a project
could take the form of explaining
TK2.1 critically evaluate the importance of modelling, tools and techniques that could
prototyping and testing be used to identify options, and
TK2.2 evaluate the importance of monitoring and refining why these might be chosen
delivery requirements and options within a project over alternatives, demonstrating
evaluation of possible tools and
techniques which could be used
to identify options to deliver the
requirements for a project.
BRO V9 01/22
53